Rossell India Ltd
ROSSELLINDRossell India Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −17.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −53.9% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a downtrend (74 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 17th percentile of its own 10-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +88.4% year on year, and 92% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Rossell India Ltd trades at ₹44.7, in a downtrend and 74 weeks into that stage. That is −22.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 4% of a 52-week range of ₹43 to ₹79. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 74 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹44.7 it trades −22.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 4% of its 52-week range (₹43–₹79).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.0 years the stock moved +67% while the NIFTY 500 moved +236% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 2 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Rossell India Ltd trades at 11.8× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 17% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 22.4×, measured across 10.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 11.8× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 17% of the time, against a long-run median of 22.4× measured over 10.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −53.9% against a −17.1% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +8.2%/yr price move, ~+148.4%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−140.2 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +4.2%/yr price move, ~+16.4%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−12.2 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.
At its price on 13 June 2026, Rossell India Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 5.7% a year. Profit itself has compounded −3.1% a year over the past 12 years. The market pays that at 11.8× P/E, the 17th percentile of its own 10-year range.
What the two numbers say together. The multiple is low against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is above what this company has actually delivered. Both readings sit on the same earnings, so they are one reading rather than two. A multiple that looks low because earnings fell is not the same thing as a low bar to clear.
How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 13 June 2026, not a running figure. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements. Every other number on this page is read off the live quote.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Rossell India Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 9 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +3.7% | +4.5% | — | +10.0% |
| Profit | −53.6% | −26.7% | — | −4.2% |
| EPS | −53.9% | −27.8% | — | −4.9% |
| Share price | −17.1% | −12.6% | +8.2% | +4.2% |
4-Factor Sector Score
42.5/100 — rank 20 of 20 in Diversified · 47% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
Rossell India Ltd scores 42.5 out of 100 against the 20 companies it is compared with in Diversified, ranking 20. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 14.8 + 11.7 + 10.8 + 5.2 = 42.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Rossell India Ltd reported ₹74.9 Cr of revenue in the Jun 24 quarter, +6.5% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 12 years it has compounded at 13.3% a year. The last full year, FY24, came in at ₹367 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹371 Cr.
FY24 revenue came in at ₹367 Cr (+3.7% on the year), capping 12 years at 13.3% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 24) printed ₹74.9 Cr, +6.5% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +4.9% growth against the decade's 13.3% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +4.8% over the last 4 quarters against +10.6%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit −41.1% vs −24.0%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Rossell India Ltd's operating margin is 10.7% in the Jun 24 quarter, +0.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 2.0% to 32.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 10.7%, +0.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 2.0%–32.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +0.0 pp year on year while gross margin went +4.7 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Rossell India Ltd earned ₹2.4 Cr of net profit in the Jun 24 quarter, +88.4% year on year. Full-year FY24 profit was ₹13.0 Cr. The 12-year compound rate is −3.1%. That is 3.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹1.3 Cr. 3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 24 profit was ₹2.4 Cr, +88.4% year on year. On the full year, FY24 printed ₹13.0 Cr (−53.6%), and the 12-year compound rate is −3.1%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +6.5% and the margin +0.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +246.4% vs revenue +4.9%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 92% of Rossell India Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY24 that was ₹6.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹13.0 Cr of profit. After ₹16.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−10.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY24: operating cash of ₹6.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹13.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−10.0 Cr after ₹16.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 92% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 92%: the cash cycle tightened 75 days between FY17 and FY24 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Rossell India Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 474 days in FY24, down from 549 days in FY17. Capital spending ran ₹44.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY24 sales of ₹367 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.0 Cr, so roughly ₹477 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY24: debtors at 63 days, inventory at 545 days — roughly 17.9 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 474 days, tighter than FY17's 549.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 545 days to sell; customers pay about 63 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 135 days — netting out to the 474-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY24 sales of ₹367 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.0 Cr — so the 474-day loop keeps roughly ₹477 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹44.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹40.0 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹14.0 Cr (FY24) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Rossell India Ltd earns a ROCE of 6% in FY24. That is up from a trough of −2% in FY17. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −5.1 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 3.5% net margin on 0.64× asset turns.
FY24 ROCE is 6%, recovered from a FY17 trough of −2% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY24): 3.5% net margin × 0.64× asset turns × 1.93× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 4.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 6.9% − 12.0% = a −5.1 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Rossell India Ltd carries ₹194 Cr of borrowings against ₹297 Cr of equity in FY24, a debt-to-equity of 0.65. Operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. Over 7 years borrowings went from ₹81.0 Cr to ₹194 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹44.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY24: borrowings of ₹194 Cr against equity of ₹297 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.65. Operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. Over 7 years borrowings went from ₹81.0 Cr to ₹194 Cr while capital spending ran ₹44.0 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of Rossell India Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Domestic institutions moved −0.5 points over the same window, to 2.7%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −0.9 points over 8 quarters to 0.6%; Domestic institutions: −0.5 points over 8 quarters to 2.7%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 74.8%.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Rossell India Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BCL Industries LtdBCLIND | 62.6/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | FADING | 19.5/35 Revenue -13.1% · PAT 15.2% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 13.9% · OPM 10% 95% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.9/20 RS sector 3.3% · RS bench 1.7% · 1Y -17.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 14.9 + 13.3 + 14.9 = 62.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Indiabulls LimitedIBULLSLTD | 61.8/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | LEADER | 18.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 28 pp 71% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 16.2% · OPM 43% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 13× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.7/20 RS sector 48.8% · RS bench 45% · 1Y 67.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 14.1 + 10.6 + 18.7 = 61.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Grasim Industries LtdGRASIM | 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | LEADER | 24.2/35 Revenue 19.5% · PAT 33.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 23% 76% evidence | 6.8/20 P/E 38.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 12.6% · RS bench 10.7% · 1Y 20.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.2 + 13.1 + 6.8 + 16.6 = 60.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Kalind Ltd526935 | 59.8/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 30.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 21 pp 95% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 32% · OPM 63% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 13.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 0.3/20 RS sector -89.2% · RS bench -36.7% · 1Y -67.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.6 + 18.2 + 10.7 + 0.3 = 59.8 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -89.2% and the one-year return is -67.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 5Sobhagya Mercantile LtdSOBME | 57.6/100Mixed-positive evidence69% evidence | 15.9/35 Revenue 21.9% · PAT 8.1% · OPM change -0.5 pp 95% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 23.4% · OPM 14.4% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 60.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 2.3% · RS bench 8.3% · 1Y -1.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 19.1 + 9.6 + 13 = 57.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 8.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 63M India Ltd3MINDIA | 55.4/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.9/35 Revenue 15.7% · PAT 16.1% · OPM change -3 pp 100% evidence | 18.7/25 ROCE 50% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 4.2/20 P/E 90.3× · PEG 3.29 100% evidence | 10.6/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench 4.5% · 1Y 11.8%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 18.7 + 4.2 + 10.6 = 55.4 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 7Balmer Lawrie & Company LtdBALMLAWRIE | 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue 8.9% · PAT 3.8% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 13% 76% evidence | 14.5/20 P/E 10.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench -8.5% · 1Y -16.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 15.1 + 14.5 + 6.9 = 53.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Texmaco Infrastructure & Holdings LtdTEXINFRA | 50.6/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | LEADER | 18.9/35 Revenue 5.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -37.9 pp 95% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM -48.8% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 151× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.2/20 RS sector 7.6% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 10.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 7 + 8.5 + 16.2 = 50.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Nurture Well Industries Ltd531889 | 50.2/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.8/35 Revenue 34% · PAT 27% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 16.5/25 ROCE 22.9% · OPM 11% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 9.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.6/20 RS sector -24.3% · RS bench -25.5% · 1Y 13.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 16.5 + 11.3 + 2.6 = 50.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Bluspring Enterprises LtdBLUSPRING | 43.4/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.5/35 Revenue 11.8% · PAT 90.6% · OPM change 0.7 pp 71% evidence | 4.2/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 2.2% 95% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 109× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench 42.5% · 1Y 37.6%10 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.5 + 4.2 + 8.7 + 12 = 43.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Nava LtdNAVA | 42.2/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.0/35 Revenue 9% · PAT -29.9% · OPM change -6 pp 100% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM 43% 100% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 21.4× · PEG 1.16 65% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -4.9% · RS bench -6.4% · 1Y -5.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10 + 13.1 + 12.9 + 6.2 = 42.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Tube Investments of India LtdTIINDIA | 41.9/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.6/35 Revenue 17.6% · PAT 6.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 9% 100% evidence | 2.1/20 P/E 84.4× · PEG 9.63 100% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -3.7% · RS bench -5.3% · 1Y -4.9%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 15.4 + 2.1 + 8.8 = 41.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Bharat Global Developers LtdBGDL | 37.0/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence | 8.2/35 Revenue -80% · PAT -80% · OPM change 4.2 pp 95% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE 0% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector 165.8% · RS bench -70.1% · 1Y 22%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 8.2 + 6.8 + 10 + 12 = 37 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Andrew Yule & Company LtdANDREWYU | 35.9/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.6/35 Revenue -4.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change 25.9 pp 95% evidence | 3.7/25 ROCE -6.3% · OPM -23.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -36.2% · RS bench 6.3% · 1Y -2.1%7 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 3.7 + 10 + 7.6 = 35.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Swan Corp LtdSWANCORP | 33.0/100Adverse evidence69% evidence | BASING | 12.0/35 Revenue -16.7% · PAT -67.2% · OPM change -2.6 pp 95% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM -0.4% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 42.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -28.5% · RS bench -23.1% · 1Y -26.6%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 6.5 + 9.8 + 4.7 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Kesar Enterprises LtdKESAR | 32.8/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | 14.4/35 Revenue -9% · PAT 34.7% · OPM change -22132 pp 62% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE -19.5% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -44.4% · RS bench -39.4% · 1Y -54.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 4.9 + 10 + 3.5 = 32.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Integrated Industries LtdIIL | 64.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | 20.5/35 Revenue 60.5% · PAT 94.6% · OPM change 2 pp 53% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 30.5% · OPM 11% 57% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.2/20 RS sector 51.9% · RS bench 63.7% · 1Y 114.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 16.4 + 10.9 + 16.2 = 64 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Arunis Abode LtdARUNIS | 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | 15.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -17.7 pp 40% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE -5.3% · OPM 28.5% 57% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 62.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.7/20 RS sector 131.3% · RS bench 136.7% · 1Y 358.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 15.2 + 9.5 + 9.3 + 16.7 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Piramal Enterprises Ltd(Merged)PEL | 44.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | 16.7/35 Revenue -35.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -9.8 pp 27% evidence | 11.1/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 77.4% 57% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 61.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -20.3% · RS bench 1% · 1Y -1.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead to 2025-09-24 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 11.1 + 9.4 + 7.6 = 44.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Rossell India Ltdthis pageROSSELLIND | 42.5/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | 14.8/35 Revenue 4.8% · PAT -41.1% · OPM change 0.1 pp 36% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 10.7% 71% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 11.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -27.9% · RS bench -19.6% · 1Y -34.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 11.7 + 10.8 + 5.2 = 42.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Rossell India Ltd's share price today?
Rossell India Ltd trades at ₹44.7, −17.1% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹168 Cr. The stock sits at 4% of its 52-week range of ₹43–₹79, −22.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 74 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.
What were Rossell India Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Rossell India Ltd reported revenue of ₹74.9 Cr and net profit of ₹2.4 Cr for the Jun 24 quarter. Revenue rose 6.5% and profit rose 88.4% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹0.64. The operating margin was 10.7%, 0.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rossell India Ltd's revenue?
Rossell India Ltd reported revenue of ₹74.9 Cr in the Jun 24 quarter, +6.5% year on year. For the full FY24 fiscal year, revenue was ₹367 Cr (+3.7%). Over the last 12 years revenue compounded at 13.3% a year. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rossell India Ltd's profit?
Rossell India Ltd earned ₹2.4 Cr of net profit in the Jun 24 quarter, +88.4% year on year. Full-year FY24 profit was ₹13.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 10.7% in the latest quarter. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rossell India Ltd's market cap?
Rossell India Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹168 Cr at a share price of ₹44.7. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rossell India Ltd's P/E ratio?
Rossell India Ltd trades at a P/E of 11.8×, at the 17th percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 22.4×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Rossell India Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — Rossell India Ltd's dividend payout was 9% of profit in FY24, and it recorded a payout in 10 of its last 12 reported fiscal years. One of those years shows a negative ratio because profit itself was negative. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rossell India Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Rossell India Ltd looks cheap: its P/E of 11.8× has been cheaper only 17% of the time in 10 years (long-run median 22.4×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rossell India Ltd growing?
Yes — Rossell India Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +6.5% year on year, profit +88.4%, and the margin +0.0 pp at 10.7%. The 12-year compound rates are 13.3% (revenue) and −3.1% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 14 August 2026.
How is Rossell India Ltd performing?
Rossell India Ltd is in a downtrend, 74 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 6.5% and profit rose 88.4% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rossell India Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 74 of stage 4), trading −22.2% versus its 200-day average and at 4% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rossell India Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Rossell India Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.0 years the stock moved +67% against the NIFTY 500's +236% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.
Will Rossell India Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Rossell India Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹44.7, the price is in a downtrend 74 weeks in. Its P/E of 11.8× sits at the 17th percentile of its own 10-year range. — as of 14 August 2026.
Who owns Rossell India Ltd?
Promoters hold 74.8% of Rossell India Ltd, foreign institutions 0.6%, domestic institutions 2.7% and the public 21.9% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Rossell India Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Rossell India Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.65, and operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. FY24 borrowings were ₹194 Cr against equity of ₹297 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rossell India Ltd's capex?
Rossell India Ltd spent ₹44.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY24 alone that was ₹16.0 Cr, with ₹14.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Rossell India Ltd's cash flow?
Rossell India Ltd generated ₹6.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY24 and ₹−10.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹16.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹13.0 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rossell India Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 92% of Rossell India Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at 46% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY24, operating cash was ₹6.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹13.0 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 14 August 2026.
Where is Rossell India Ltd in its business cycle?
Rossell India Ltd's FY24 operating margin was 10.0%, against a 12-year band of 2.0%–32.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 10.7%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.
What growth does Rossell India Ltd's price assume?
At its price on 13 June 2026, Rossell India Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 5.7% a year. Profit itself has compounded −3.1% a year over the past 12 years. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 14 August 2026.
What could break the Rossell India Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −17.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −53.9% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Rossell India Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Rossell India Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.