KNR Constructions Ltd
KNRCONKNR Constructions Ltd is cheap for a reason. The P/E sits at the 19th percentile of its own range, and the quarters are still getting worse.
The sharpest disagreement: the P/E sits at the 19th percentile of its own range, but the engine is deteriorating — cheap for a reason until the quarters turn.
The price is in a downtrend (82 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 19th percentile of its own 11-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −34.1% year on year, and −46% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the quarters turn before the discount closes.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
KNR Constructions Ltd trades at ₹126, in a downtrend and 82 weeks into that stage. That is −11.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 21% of a 52-week range of ₹110 to ₹188. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (4 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 82 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹126 it trades −11.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 21% of its 52-week range (₹110–₹188).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +144% while the NIFTY 500 moved +267% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (4 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-14) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
KNR Constructions Ltd trades at 10.3× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 19% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 16.1×, measured across 10.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 10.3× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 19% of the time, against a long-run median of 16.1× measured over 10.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −56.4% against a −35.9% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the −16.7%/yr price move, ~−3.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−13.7 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +6.0%/yr price move, ~+17.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−11.6 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 1,634% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.
Solved at its 13 June 2026 price, KNR Constructions Ltd was paying for profit growth of about 0.8% a year. Profit itself has compounded 14.6% a year over the past 10 years. Today the market pays 10.3× P/E, the 19th percentile of its own 11-year range.
What the two numbers say together. The multiple is low against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is below what this company has actually delivered.
How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 13 June 2026, not a running figure — every other number on this page, the multiple included, is read off the live quote as of 11 September 2026. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements.
Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
KNR Constructions Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −39.0% latest against +29.0% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 10.0%. The read is built from 8 quarters across 4 curves, on partial evidence.
🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −43.2% | −12.7% | −1.5% | +8.5% |
| Profit | −56.4% | −0.2% | +2.7% | +14.6% |
| EPS | −56.4% | −1.6% | +1.4% | +14.6% |
| Share price | −35.9% | −22.4% | −16.7% | +6.0% |
4-Factor Sector Score
39.5/100 — rank 15 of 18 in Infra - Construction & Contracting · 82% evidence confidence
KNR Constructions Ltd scores 39.5 out of 100 against the 18 companies it is compared with in Infra - Construction & Contracting, ranking 15. Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 4.3 + 11.7 + 13.8 + 9.7 = 39.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
KNR Constructions Ltd reported ₹588 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, −4.1% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 8.5% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,698 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,673 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,698 Cr (−43.2% on the year), capping 10 years at 8.5% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹588 Cr, −4.1% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −28.0% growth against the decade's 8.5% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −39.0% over the last 4 quarters against −22.3%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit −58.8% vs −29.1%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
KNR Constructions Ltd's operating margin is 16.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, −14.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 14.0% to 34.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 16.0%, −14.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 14.0%–34.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −13.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +8.8 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
KNR Constructions Ltd earned ₹81.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −34.1% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹437 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 14.6%. That is 13.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹123 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹81.0 Cr, −34.1% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹437 Cr (−56.4%), and the 10-year compound rate is 14.6%.
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −4.1% and the margin −14.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +262.6% vs revenue −28.0%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years −46% of KNR Constructions Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹−149 Cr of operating cash against ₹437 Cr of profit. After ₹6.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−155 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹−149 Cr against reported profit of ₹437 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−155 Cr after ₹6.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −46% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why conversion sits at −46%: the cash cycle stretched 37 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.
Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 37 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
KNR Constructions Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 38 days in FY26, up from 1 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹66.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,698 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹7.4 Cr, so roughly ₹281 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 109 days, inventory at 63 days — roughly 2.1 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 38 days, looser than FY21's 1.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 63 days to sell; customers pay about 109 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 135 days — netting out to the 38-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,698 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹7.4 Cr — so the 38-day loop keeps roughly ₹281 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹66.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹530 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
KNR Constructions Ltd earns a ROCE of 10% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 6% in FY15. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 16.2% net margin on 0.33× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 10%, recovered from a FY15 trough of 6% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 16.2% net margin × 0.33× asset turns × 1.63× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 8.7% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 1,634% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
KNR Constructions Ltd carries ₹2,444 Cr of borrowings against ₹4,972 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.49. Operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹764 Cr to ₹2,444 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹66.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY26: borrowings of ₹2,444 Cr against equity of ₹4,972 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.49. Operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹764 Cr to ₹2,444 Cr while capital spending ran ₹66.0 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.
The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 1,634% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions cut 13.4 points of KNR Constructions Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 17.3% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −2.8 points over the same window, to 5.4%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −13.4 points over 8 quarters to 17.3%; Foreign institutions: −2.8 points over 8 quarters to 5.4%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 48.8%.
🚨 Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (−13.4 points), alongside foreign institutions (−2.8 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
KNR Constructions Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Cemindia Projects LtdCEMPRO | 58.4/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 24.1/35 Revenue 8.9% · PAT 47.2% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 17.3/25 ROCE 32.8% · OPM 10% 100% evidence | 2.5/20 P/E 35.5× · PEG 5.81 100% evidence | 14.5/20 RS sector 44.8% · RS bench 39.7% · 1Y 71.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 17.3 + 2.5 + 14.5 = 58.4 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Mold-Tek Technologies LtdMOLDTECH | 57.8/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | 28.0/35 Revenue 48.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 18.5 pp 95% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE 9.5% · OPM 19.9% 76% evidence | 7.3/20 P/E 32.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 39% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 28 + 10.2 + 7.3 + 12.3 = 57.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Patel Engineering LtdPATELENG | 54.1/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.7/35 Revenue -1.4% · PAT 4.7% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 13.3% · OPM 14% 100% evidence | 14.7/20 P/E 6.7× · PEG 1.52 100% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -6.4% · RS bench -9.6% · 1Y -26.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.7 + 15.3 + 14.7 + 9.4 = 54.1 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 4Larsen & Toubro LtdLT | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.7/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT 5.8% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 12% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.6/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench 0.7% · 1Y 10.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.7 + 15.6 + 8.7 + 10.6 = 53.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5SPML Infra LtdSPMLINFRA | 52.9/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 27.3/35 Revenue 37.8% · PAT 80.8% · OPM change 4.4 pp 95% evidence | 3.5/25 ROCE 6.8% · OPM 9% 95% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 17.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.5/20 RS sector 3.7% · RS bench -11.3% · 1Y -41.3%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.3 + 3.5 + 10.6 + 11.5 = 52.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Ramky Infrastructure LtdRAMKY | 51.0/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.2/35 Revenue 4.6% · PAT 17.8% · OPM change -14 pp 95% evidence | 12.1/25 ROCE 13.7% · OPM 6% 76% evidence | 14.0/20 P/E 12.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.7/20 RS sector 13.8% · RS bench -31.1% · 1Y -41%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.2 + 12.1 + 14 + 11.7 = 51 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 7NBCC (India) LtdNBCC | 49.4/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.5/35 Revenue 3.8% · PAT 30.9% · OPM change 2.4 pp 95% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 29.3% · OPM 7% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 32.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -16.5% · 1Y -18.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.5 + 17.8 + 10.1 + 3 = 49.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Hindustan Construction Company LtdHCC | 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 5.8/35 Revenue -20.7% · PAT 0% · OPM change -5 pp 100% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 24.8% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 44× · PEG 1.3 65% evidence | 15.9/20 RS sector 14.1% · RS bench 10.1% · 1Y -6.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5.8 + 15.4 + 11.4 + 15.9 = 48.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 10.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 9PNC Infratech LtdPNCINFRA | 47.1/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.9/35 Revenue -6.5% · PAT 9.4% · OPM change 5 pp 100% evidence | 10.0/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 31% 100% evidence | 17.7/20 P/E 7.4× · PEG 0.17 100% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -20.3% · RS bench -23.2% · 1Y -44%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 10 + 17.7 + 3.5 = 47.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Hazoor Multi Projects LtdHAZOOR | 46.0/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence | 13.6/35 Revenue -30.5% · PAT -34.1% · OPM change 70.1 pp 95% evidence | 13.4/25 ROCE 12% · OPM 84.5% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 17.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.6/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench -36.5% · 1Y -53.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 13.6 + 13.4 + 10.4 + 8.6 = 46 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11IRB Infrastructure Developers LtdIRB | 45.7/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | BASING | 15.7/35 Revenue -2.2% · PAT -80% · OPM change 9 pp 95% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 54% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 24.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -2.4% · RS bench -5% · 1Y -7.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 10.7 + 10.2 + 9.1 = 45.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Simplex Infrastructures LtdSIMPLEXINF | 43.2/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | FADING | 24.5/35 Revenue 4.6% · PAT 80.8% · OPM change 3.9 pp 95% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE 2.4% · OPM 7% 95% evidence | 5.6/20 P/E 44.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector -19.8% · RS bench 6.1% · 1Y -14.7%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.5 + 4.4 + 5.6 + 8.7 = 43.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Likhitha Infrastructure LtdLIKHITHA | 42.9/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.2/35 Revenue -18.8% · PAT -51.4% · OPM change -2.7 pp 95% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 13.7% · OPM 12.9% 95% evidence | 7.1/20 P/E 26.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.5/20 RS sector 11.3% · RS bench 7.3% · 1Y -12.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.2 + 14.1 + 7.1 + 14.5 = 42.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 7.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 14H.G. Infra Engineering LtdHGINFRA | 39.9/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BASING | 15.1/35 Revenue -3.1% · PAT -57.9% · OPM change 10 pp 100% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 11.3% · OPM 28% 100% evidence | 7.0/20 P/E 12.1× · PEG 3.17 100% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -27.7% · RS bench -25.5% · 1Y -51.5%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 13.3 + 7 + 4.5 = 39.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15KNR Constructions Ltdthis pageKNRCON | 39.5/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | TURNING | 4.3/35 Revenue -39% · PAT -58.8% · OPM change -14 pp 95% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 10.4% · OPM 16% 76% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 10.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.7/20 RS sector -7.9% · RS bench -11.3% · 1Y -36.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.3 + 11.7 + 13.8 + 9.7 = 39.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 16Rail Vikas Nigam LtdRVNL | 38.7/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | BASING | 16.1/35 Revenue 5.4% · PAT -24.5% · OPM change 2.9 pp 100% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 4.3% 100% evidence | 4.5/20 P/E 47.5× · PEG 5.08 65% evidence | 11.1/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench -27.9% · 1Y -37.8%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 7 + 4.5 + 11.1 = 38.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Vishnu Prakash R Punglia LtdVPRPL | 30.3/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | 9.4/35 Revenue -22.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -18 pp 53% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 11.4% · OPM -7% 71% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 59.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -56.9% · RS bench -67.1% · 1Y -72.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 9.4 + 9.4 + 8.5 + 3 = 30.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Giriraj Civil Developers LtdGIRIRAJ | 51.2/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | 21.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 27% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 20.1% · OPM 8% 71% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -12.3% · 1Y -42.4%4 of 11 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 15 + 10.3 + 4.7 = 51.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is KNR Constructions Ltd's share price today?
KNR Constructions Ltd trades at ₹126, −35.9% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹3,534 Cr. The stock sits at 21% of its 52-week range of ₹110–₹188, −11.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 82 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.
What were KNR Constructions Ltd's latest quarterly results?
KNR Constructions Ltd reported revenue of ₹588 Cr and net profit of ₹81.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue fell 4.1% and profit fell 34.1% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹2.87. The operating margin was 16.0%, 14.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is KNR Constructions Ltd's revenue?
KNR Constructions Ltd reported revenue of ₹588 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, −4.1% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹2,698 Cr (−43.2%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 8.5% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is KNR Constructions Ltd's profit?
KNR Constructions Ltd earned ₹81.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −34.1% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹437 Cr. The operating margin ran 16.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is KNR Constructions Ltd's market cap?
KNR Constructions Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹3,534 Cr at a share price of ₹126. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is KNR Constructions Ltd's P/E ratio?
KNR Constructions Ltd trades at a P/E of 10.3×, at the 19th percentile of its own 11-year range, against a long-run median of 16.1×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.
Does KNR Constructions Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — KNR Constructions Ltd's dividend payout was 2% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is KNR Constructions Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, KNR Constructions Ltd looks cheap: its P/E of 10.3× has been cheaper only 19% of the time in 11 years (long-run median 16.1×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is KNR Constructions Ltd growing?
Not right now — KNR Constructions Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −4.1% year on year, profit −34.1%, and the margin −14.0 pp at 16.0%. The 10-year compound rates are 8.5% (revenue) and 14.6% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 11 September 2026.
How is KNR Constructions Ltd performing?
KNR Constructions Ltd is in a downtrend, 82 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 4.1% and profit fell 34.1% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 4 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.
What stage is KNR Constructions Ltd in?
Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −39.0% latest against +29.0% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 10.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −39.0% latest, profit growth −58.8% latest, eps growth −58.6% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 11 September 2026.
Is KNR Constructions Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 82 of stage 4), trading −11.5% versus its 200-day average and at 21% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.
Is KNR Constructions Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view KNR Constructions Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (4 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-14), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +144% against the NIFTY 500's +267% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.
Will KNR Constructions Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for KNR Constructions Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹126, the price is in a downtrend 82 weeks in. Its P/E of 10.3× sits at the 19th percentile of its own 11-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.
Who owns KNR Constructions Ltd?
Promoters hold 48.8% of KNR Constructions Ltd, foreign institutions 5.4%, domestic institutions 17.3% and the public 28.5% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions cut 13.4 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.
Does KNR Constructions Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — KNR Constructions Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.49, and operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. FY26 borrowings were ₹2,444 Cr against equity of ₹4,972 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.
What is KNR Constructions Ltd's capex?
KNR Constructions Ltd spent ₹66.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹6.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is KNR Constructions Ltd's cash flow?
KNR Constructions Ltd consumed ₹149 Cr of operating cash in FY26 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: ₹−155 Cr). Operating cash was negative while the company reported a profit of ₹437 Cr. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is KNR Constructions Ltd's profit real cash?
No — operating cash was negative over the last 3 fiscal years: KNR Constructions Ltd consumed cash while reporting profit. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−149 Cr against reported profit of ₹437 Cr. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.
Where is KNR Constructions Ltd in its business cycle?
KNR Constructions Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 26.0%, against a 13-year band of 14.0%–34.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 16.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.
What growth does KNR Constructions Ltd's price assume?
At its price on 13 June 2026, KNR Constructions Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 0.8% a year. Profit itself has compounded 14.6% a year over the past 10 years. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 11 September 2026.
What could break the KNR Constructions Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the P/E sits at the 19th percentile of its own range, but the engine is deteriorating — cheap for a reason until the quarters turn. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.
Is KNR Constructions Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: KNR Constructions Ltd is cheap for a reason. The P/E sits at the 19th percentile of its own range, and the quarters are still getting worse. The sharpest open question: whether the quarters turn before the discount closes. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!