Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

Jindal Steel Ltd

JINDALSTEL
Steel Products

Jindal Steel Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved +1.5 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (60 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 86th percentile of its own 8-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −43.6% year on year, and 198% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.

Stage
Deteriorating
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
₹1,102
+16.6% 1Y
P/E
36.4×
86th pctile
of its own 8-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹15,482 Cr
+25.9% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹844 Cr
−43.6% YoY
Operating margin
17.0%
−7.0 pp YoY
ROCE
10%
FY26
ROIC
6.6%
vs WACC 12.0% → −5.4 pp
Cash conversion
198%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Jindal Steel Ltd trades at ₹1,102, in a confirmed uptrend and 60 weeks into that stage. That is −0.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 41% of a 52-week range of ₹987 to ₹1,270. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (12 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 60 of stage 2. At ₹1,102 it trades −0.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 41% of its 52-week range (₹987–₹1,270).

Jul 26: ₹1,102 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−0.2% versus the 200-day line, week 60 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4S2₹1,328₹1,119₹910₹701₹492₹1,102₹1,105Jul 23May 24Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
S2S4S2₹1,328₹1,119₹910₹701₹492₹1,102₹1,105Jul 23Feb 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (550 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Feb 16Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +1,964% while the NIFTY 500 moved +282% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (12 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-05) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Jindal Steel Ltd trades at 36.4× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (86th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 17.4×, measured across 7.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 36.4× is at the pricey end of its own range (86th percentile), against a long-run median of 17.4× measured over 7.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 36.4× vs a 17.4× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 7.5-year window; loss-period spikes above 52× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
at the pricey end of its own range (86th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
55.8×₹72.842.3×₹54.628.7×₹36.415.1×₹18.21.6×₹0.0×36.40×₹30Feb 19Jan 22Aug 23Mar 25Jul 26
55.8×₹72.842.3×₹54.628.7×₹36.415.1×₹18.21.6×₹0.0×36.40×₹30Feb 19Aug 23Jul 26
PEG 1.07 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 21 quarters.
above 1.0, the multiple already banks the growth
PEGPEG = 1.0
4.0×3.1×2.1×1.2×0.2××1.07×Q1 FY22Q2 FY23Q3 FY24Q4 FY25Q1 FY27
4.0×3.1×2.1×1.2×0.2××1.07×Q1 FY22Q3 FY24Q1 FY27
P/E
36.4×
86th percentile of 8y
PEG
0.49
as reported

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +19.7% against a +16.6% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +20.6%/yr price move, ~−10.5%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+31.1 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Deteriorating

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Jindal Steel Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −9.8% latest against +94.3% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE holding at 7.2%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +6.2% in FY26, profit +18.1% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
60%98%39%58%17%17%−3.9%−23%−25%−64%%%6.2%18.1%FY16FY21FY26
60%98%39%58%17%17%−3.9%−23%−25%−64%%%6.2%18.1%FY16FY21FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating, profit accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
18%107%12%64%5.3%21%−1.2%−22%−7.7%−64%%%16.5%−9.8%−8.4%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
18%107%12%64%5.3%21%−1.2%−22%−7.7%−64%%%16.5%−9.8%−8.4%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
14%12%10%8.2%6.4%%7.2%Sep 23Mar 24Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
14%12%10%8.2%6.4%%7.2%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
Revenue growth
Flat
latest +16.5% · span −5.9% to +16.5%
Profit growth
Flat
latest −9.8% · span −52.1% to +94.3%
EPS growth
Flat
latest −8.4% · span −52.6% to +94.8%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 7.2% · span 6.9%–13.1%

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+6.2%+0.0%+9.0%+10.6%
Profit+18.1%−5.4%−4.7%
EPS+19.7%+2.0%−1.5%
Share price+16.6%+18.3%+20.6%+29.4%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+25.9%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
−43.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
10.6%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

33.0/100 — rank 14 of 17 in Steel Products · 100% evidence confidence

Jindal Steel Ltd scores 33.0 out of 100 against the 17 companies it is compared with in Steel Products, ranking 14. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 12.3 + 9.7 + 6.1 + 4.9 = 33. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Jindal Steel Ltd reported ₹15,482 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +25.9% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 10.6% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹53,225 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹56,413 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹53,225 Cr (+6.2% on the year), capping 10 years at 10.6% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹15,482 Cr, +25.9% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue ₹53,225 Cr (+6.2% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
10.6% a year over 10 years
RevenueYoY growth
57.5k60%43.1k39%28.7k17%14.4k−3.9%0−25%₹ Cr%₹53,2256.2%FY16FY21FY26
57.5k60%43.1k39%28.7k17%14.4k−3.9%0−25%₹ Cr%₹53,2256.2%FY16FY21FY26
Jun 26: ₹15,482 Cr (+25.9% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
4th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
17.5k29%13.1k18%8.8k8.1%4.4k−2.2%0−13%₹ Cr%₹15,48225.9%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
17.5k29%13.1k18%8.8k8.1%4.4k−2.2%0−13%₹ Cr%₹15,48225.9%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +16.0% growth against the decade's 10.6% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +16.5% over the last 4 quarters against +5.1%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit −9.8% vs −30.4%/yr — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Jindal Steel Ltd's operating margin is 17.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, −7.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 18.0% to 38.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 17.0%, −7.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 18.0%–38.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −7.3 pp year on year while gross margin went −7.6 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY26: 18.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 13-year window.
within a 18.0–38.0% band over 13 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
40%22%34%13%28%4.5%22%−4.5%16%−13%%%18%−1%FY14FY20FY26
40%22%34%13%28%4.5%22%−4.5%16%−13%%%18%−1%FY14FY20FY26
Jun 26: 17.0% operating margin (−7.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
25%6.0%22%2.5%19%−1.0%15%−4.5%12%−8.0%%%17%−7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
25%6.0%22%2.5%19%−1.0%15%−4.5%12%−8.0%%%17%−7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Jindal Steel Ltd earned ₹844 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −43.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹3,361 Cr. That is 5.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹1,496 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Jun 26 profit was ₹844 Cr, −43.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹3,361 Cr (+18.1%).

FY26 profit ₹3,361 Cr (+18.1% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
7.6k67%4.7k35%1.8k3.3%−1.0k−29%−3.9k−61%₹ Cr%₹3,36118.1%FY16FY21FY26
7.6k67%4.7k35%1.8k3.3%−1.0k−29%−3.9k−61%₹ Cr%₹3,36118.1%FY16FY21FY26
Jun 26: ₹844 Cr (−43.6% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
2.1k653%1.5k442%812231%16520%−483−191%₹ Cr%₹844−43.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
2.1k653%1.5k442%812231%16520%−483−191%₹ Cr%₹844−43.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +25.9% and the margin −7.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −50.0% vs revenue +16.0%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 198% of Jindal Steel Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹7,204 Cr of operating cash against ₹3,361 Cr of profit. After ₹9,931 Cr of capital spending, ₹−2,727 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹7,204 Cr against reported profit of ₹3,361 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−2,727 Cr after ₹9,931 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 198% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹7,204 Cr vs profit ₹3,361 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution. FY16 reflects an acquisition year — point shown clipped.
198% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
28.3k19.8k11.3k2.8k−5.7k₹ Cr₹7,204₹3,361₹−2,727FY16FY21FY26
28.3k19.8k11.3k2.8k−5.7k₹ Cr₹7,204₹3,361₹−2,727FY16FY21FY26
FY26: CFO = 214% of profit (three-year rate 198%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash; outlier years shown pinned.
Conversion100%
316%258%200%142%84%%214%FY16FY21FY26
316%258%200%142%84%%214%FY16FY21FY26

Why conversion sits at 198%: the cash cycle tightened 91 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 3.4× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Jindal Steel Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 1 days in FY26, down from 92 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹29,823 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹53,225 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹146 Cr, so roughly ₹146 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 12 days, inventory at 115 days — roughly 3.8 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 1 days, tighter than FY21's 92.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 115 days to sell; customers pay about 12 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 126 days — netting out to the 1-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹53,225 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹146 Cr — so the 1-day loop keeps roughly ₹146 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 1-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 13-year window.
−91 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
34925516269−25days1d115d12d126dFY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
34925516269−25days1d115d12d126dFY14FY20FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹29,823 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹8,761 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹7,265 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹9,931 Cr, work-in-progress ₹7,265 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
28.4k17.0k5.6k−5.8k−17.2k₹ Cr₹9,931₹7,265FY16FY18FY21FY23FY26
28.4k17.0k5.6k−5.8k−17.2k₹ Cr₹9,931₹7,265FY16FY21FY26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Jindal Steel Ltd earns a ROCE of 10% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −1% in FY16. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −5.4 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 6.3% net margin on 0.54× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 10%, recovered from a FY16 trough of −1% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 6.3% net margin × 0.54× asset turns × 1.92× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 6.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 6.6% − 12.0% = a −5.4 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE 10% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 13-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY16's −1%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
26%19%12%4.3%−3.0%%10%7.7%FY14FY20FY26
26%19%12%4.3%−3.0%%10%7.7%FY14FY20FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE 8.1% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
15%12%8.5%5.2%1.9%%8.1%7.9%Q2 FY24Q3 FY25Q1 FY27
15%12%8.5%5.2%1.9%%8.1%7.9%Q2 FY24Q3 FY25Q1 FY27
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Jindal Steel Ltd carries total debt of ₹22,610 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹51,841 Cr as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.44. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.36 in FY22 to 0.44 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Jun 26: total debt of ₹22,610 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹51,841 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.44. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.36 (FY22) to 0.44 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY26: debt ₹22,610 Cr at 0.44× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
24.4k0.45×18.3k0.42×12.2k0.39×6.1k0.35×00.32×₹ Cr×₹22,6100.44×FY22FY24FY26
24.4k0.45×18.3k0.42×12.2k0.39×6.1k0.35×00.32×₹ Cr×₹22,6100.44×FY22FY24FY26
Jun 26: debt ₹22,610 Cr, debt-to-equity 0.44 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
24.4k0.45×18.3k0.41×12.2k0.38×6.1k0.35×00.31×₹ Cr×₹22,6100.44×Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
24.4k0.45×18.3k0.41×12.2k0.38×6.1k0.35×00.31×₹ Cr×₹22,6100.44×Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Domestic institutions added 4.2 points of Jindal Steel Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 19.5% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −3.8 points over the same window, to 8.8%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: +4.2 points over 8 quarters to 19.5%; Foreign institutions: −3.8 points over 8 quarters to 8.8%; Promoters: +1.5 points over 8 quarters to 62.7%.

Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −3.8 points against domestic institutions +4.2 points over 8 quarters, with promoters +1.5 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +1.5 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
67%51%36%20%4.4%%62.7%9.2%19.1%8.7%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
67%51%36%20%4.4%%62.7%9.2%19.1%8.7%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Domestic institutions added 4.2 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
67%51%36%20%4.4%%62.7%8.8%19.5%8.7%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
67%51%36%20%4.4%%62.7%8.8%19.5%8.7%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Jindal Steel Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Steel Products
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Shyam Metalics & Energy LtdSHYAMMETL 69.2/100Favorable setup97% evidence LEADER 26.3/35 Revenue 22.8% · PAT 21.3% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 13% · OPM 14% 95% evidence 12.3/20 P/E 25.6× · PEG 1.19 100% evidence 16.8/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench 14.5% · 1Y 6.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.3 + 13.8 + 12.3 + 16.8 = 69.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Raghav Productivity Enhancers LtdRPEL 68.6/100Favorable setup94% evidence TURNING 31.8/35 Revenue 34.3% · PAT 53.7% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 19.5/25 ROCE 30.3% · OPM 30% 100% evidence 5.2/20 P/E 89.1× · PEG 2.31 100% evidence 12.1/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench 41.8% · 1Y 83.6%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 31.8 + 19.5 + 5.2 + 12.1 = 68.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3Kamdhenu LtdKAMDHENU 67.0/100Favorable setup66% evidence LEADER 19.9/35 Revenue 34.5% · PAT 74.7% · OPM change -2 pp 35% evidence 16.3/25 ROCE 16.9% · OPM 7.2% 95% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 31.8× · PEG — 50% evidence 19.8/20 RS sector 18.2% · RS bench 30.6% · 1Y 14.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.9 + 16.3 + 11 + 19.8 = 67 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Sunflag Iron & Steel Company LtdSUNFLAG 64.0/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence LEADER 23.4/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT 25.3% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM 12% 100% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 31.6× · PEG 0.65 100% evidence 18.8/20 RS sector 15.5% · RS bench 27% · 1Y 28.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.4 + 10.3 + 11.5 + 18.8 = 64 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5BMW Industries Ltd542669 60.8/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.8/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 8% · OPM change 7 pp 83% evidence 15.1/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 28% 76% evidence 13.3/20 P/E 13.3× · PEG — 50% evidence 11.6/20 RS sector -2.8% · RS bench 6.7% · 1Y -7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.8 + 15.1 + 13.3 + 11.6 = 60.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Vardhman Special Steels LtdVSSL 57.7/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence LEADER 15.7/35 Revenue 6.3% · PAT 1.1% · OPM change 4.8 pp 100% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 16.5% · OPM 11.8% 100% evidence 15.0/20 P/E 32× · PEG 0.42 65% evidence 12.9/20 RS sector 0.2% · RS bench 11.1% · 1Y 18.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.7 + 14.1 + 15 + 12.9 = 57.7 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
7Rhetan TMT LtdRHETAN 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence89% evidence FADING 23.1/35 Revenue -34.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 76.5 pp 88% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 10.9% · OPM 29.9% 100% evidence 3.7/20 P/E 237× · PEG 3.94 65% evidence 13.8/20 RS sector 9.8% · RS bench 21.6% · 1Y 80.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.1 + 12.4 + 3.7 + 13.8 = 53 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Kalyani Steels LtdKSL 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence FADING 12.4/35 Revenue -6.9% · PAT 1.6% · OPM change -1 pp 88% evidence 17.4/25 ROCE 14.8% · OPM 20% 100% evidence 12.2/20 P/E 14.5× · PEG 1.01 100% evidence 10.3/20 RS sector -1.2% · RS bench 9.4% · 1Y -2.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.4 + 17.4 + 12.2 + 10.3 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Steel Exchange India LtdSTEELXIND 44.5/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence LEADER 11.8/35 Revenue -12.8% · PAT -8.8% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence 9.4/25 ROCE 10.9% · OPM 13% 95% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 45.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.9/20 RS sector 3.2% · RS bench 13.6% · 1Y 5.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.8 + 9.4 + 9.4 + 13.9 = 44.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 13.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
10Prakash Industries LtdPRAKASH 44.3/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence ASLEEP 12.1/35 Revenue -13.3% · PAT -6.2% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence 12.1/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM 16% 95% evidence 14.1/20 P/E 6.6× · PEG — 50% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -9.1% · RS bench -14.5% · 1Y -30.1%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 12.1 + 14.1 + 6 = 44.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
11Gallantt Ispat Ltd.GALLANTT 34.9/100Adverse evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 8.8/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT -3.8% · OPM change -6 pp 100% evidence 16.7/25 ROCE 18.2% · OPM 16% 100% evidence 6.9/20 P/E 34× · PEG 1.7 100% evidence 2.5/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y -3.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 8.8 + 16.7 + 6.9 + 2.5 = 34.9 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
12Salasar Techno Engineering LtdSALASAR 33.7/100Adverse evidence69% evidence ASLEEP 13.3/35 Revenue 4.9% · PAT -33.3% · OPM change -2.9 pp 62% evidence 8.2/25 ROCE 8.1% · OPM 3.1% 95% evidence 8.3/20 P/E 59.3× · PEG — 50% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -16.5% · RS bench -27.2% · 1Y -19.7%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.3 + 8.2 + 8.3 + 3.9 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Panchmahal Steel LtdPANCHMSTEL 33.3/100Adverse evidence61% evidence ASLEEP 15.2/35 Revenue 0.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3.5 pp 62% evidence 4.3/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 3.5% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -11.7% · RS bench -1.6% · 1Y 18.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.2 + 4.3 + 10 + 3.8 = 33.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Jindal Steel Ltdthis pageJINDALSTEL 33.0/100Adverse evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 12.3/35 Revenue 16.5% · PAT -9.8% · OPM change -7 pp 100% evidence 9.7/25 ROCE 9.7% · OPM 17% 100% evidence 6.1/20 P/E 36.4× · PEG 2.69 100% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench -1.2% · 1Y 10.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.3 + 9.7 + 6.1 + 4.9 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Beekay Steel Industries LtdBEEKAY 30.2/100Adverse evidence77% evidence ASLEEP 9.6/35 Revenue 9.3% · PAT -58.9% · OPM change -2 pp 83% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 7% 95% evidence 8.2/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 4.7/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -7.2% · 1Y -19.4%1 of 6 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.6 + 7.7 + 8.2 + 4.7 = 30.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Electrotherm (India) LtdELECTHERM 24.3/100Adverse evidence67% evidence TURNING 5.1/35 Revenue -10.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3.9 pp 83% evidence 2.1/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 2.1% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 7.1/20 RS sector -28.1% · RS bench 13.4% · 1Y -1.5%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 5.1 + 2.1 + 10 + 7.1 = 24.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17Banganga Paper Industries LtdBANGANGA 45.4/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence 19.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -2 pp 40% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 27% · OPM 5.7% 57% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 347× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -30.2% · RS bench -32.7% · 1Y -46.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.7 + 14.2 + 8.5 + 3 = 45.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Jindal Steel Ltd's share price today?

Jindal Steel Ltd trades at ₹1,102, +16.6% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹1,12,455 Cr. The stock sits at 41% of its 52-week range of ₹987–₹1,270, −0.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 60 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were Jindal Steel Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Jindal Steel Ltd reported revenue of ₹15,482 Cr and net profit of ₹844 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 25.9% and profit fell 43.6% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹8.28. The operating margin was 17.0%, 7.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Jindal Steel Ltd's revenue?

Jindal Steel Ltd reported revenue of ₹15,482 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +25.9% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹53,225 Cr (+6.2%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 10.6% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Jindal Steel Ltd's profit?

Jindal Steel Ltd earned ₹844 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −43.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹3,361 Cr. The operating margin ran 17.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Jindal Steel Ltd's market cap?

Jindal Steel Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹1,12,455 Cr at a share price of ₹1,102. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Jindal Steel Ltd's P/E ratio?

Jindal Steel Ltd trades at a P/E of 36.4×, at the 86th percentile of its own 8-year range, against a long-run median of 17.4×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Jindal Steel Ltd pay a dividend?

Yes — Jindal Steel Ltd's dividend payout was 6% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in 6 of its last 13 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Jindal Steel Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Jindal Steel Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 36.4× sits at the 86th percentile of its 8-year range (long-run median 17.4×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Jindal Steel Ltd growing?

Not right now — Jindal Steel Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue +25.9% year on year, profit −43.6%, and the margin −7.0 pp at 17.0%. The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 31 July 2026.

How is Jindal Steel Ltd performing?

Jindal Steel Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 60 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 25.9% and profit fell 43.6% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 12 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

What stage is Jindal Steel Ltd in?

Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −9.8% latest against +94.3% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE holding at 7.2%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +16.5% latest, profit growth −9.8% latest, eps growth −8.4% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Jindal Steel Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 60 of stage 2), trading −0.2% versus its 200-day average and at 41% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Jindal Steel Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Jindal Steel Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (12 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-05), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +1,964% against the NIFTY 500's +282% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.

Will Jindal Steel Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Jindal Steel Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹1,102, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 60 weeks in. Its P/E of 36.4× sits at the 86th percentile of its own 8-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns Jindal Steel Ltd?

Promoters hold 62.7% of Jindal Steel Ltd, foreign institutions 8.8%, domestic institutions 19.5% and the public 8.7% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions added 4.2 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Jindal Steel Ltd have too much debt?

It is moderate — Jindal Steel Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.44, and operating profit covers the interest bill 6×. FY26 borrowings were ₹22,610 Cr against equity of ₹50,899 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Jindal Steel Ltd's capex?

Jindal Steel Ltd spent ₹29,823 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹9,931 Cr, with ₹7,265 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Jindal Steel Ltd's cash flow?

Jindal Steel Ltd generated ₹7,204 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−2,727 Cr of free cash flow after ₹9,931 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹3,361 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Jindal Steel Ltd's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 198% of Jindal Steel Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹7,204 Cr against reported profit of ₹3,361 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is Jindal Steel Ltd in its business cycle?

Jindal Steel Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 18.0%, against a 13-year band of 18.0%–38.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 17.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the Jindal Steel Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved +1.5 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Jindal Steel Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Jindal Steel Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI