Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

Electrotherm (India) Ltd

ELECTHERM
Steel Products

Electrotherm (India) Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +11.3% in a year while annual EPS moved −103.5% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (7 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 97th percentile of its own 7-year range. But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.

Stage
Deteriorating
partial read
Price
₹1,008
+11.3% 1Y
P/E
18.4×
97th pctile
of its own 7-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
₹1,140 Cr
−1.8% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
₹14.0 Cr
−92.5% YoY
Operating margin
2.1%
−3.9 pp YoY
ROCE
0%
FY26
ROIC
−0.8%
vs WACC 12.0% → −12.8 pp
Cash conversion
112%
of profit, last 3 FY
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified. PEG is the exception: the quarterly curve is not drawn at all. PEG asks what is being paid for growth — both sides of that division come from the source that could not be checked, so it is withheld instead of marked.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Electrotherm (India) Ltd trades at ₹1,008, in a confirmed uptrend and 7 weeks into that stage. That is +11.0% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 70% of a 52-week range of ₹567 to ₹1,200. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 7 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹1,008 it trades +11.0% versus its 200-day average and sits at 70% of its 52-week range (₹567–₹1,200).

Jul 26: ₹1,008 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+11.0% versus the 200-day line, week 7 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S2S4₹1,513₹1,128₹742₹356₹−29.2₹1,008₹908Jul 23May 24Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
S2S2S4₹1,513₹1,128₹742₹356₹−29.2₹1,008₹908Jul 23Feb 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (546 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 16Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +2,067% while the NIFTY 500 moved +276% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Electrotherm (India) Ltd trades at 18.4× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (97th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 2.8×, measured across 6.7 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 18.4× is at the pricey end of its own range (97th percentile), against a long-run median of 2.8× measured over 6.7 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 18.4× vs a 2.8× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 6.7-year window; loss-period spikes above 8.4× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
at the pricey end of its own range (97th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
9.0×₹3246.8×₹2434.7×₹1622.5×₹81.00.3×₹0.0×8.40×₹39Sep 19Jan 22Mar 24Apr 25May 26
9.0×₹3246.8×₹2434.7×₹1622.5×₹81.00.3×₹0.0×8.40×₹39Sep 19Mar 24May 26
P/E
18.4×
97th percentile of 7y

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −103.5% against a +11.3% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +129.3%/yr price move, ~+26.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+103.0 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

03 · Stage: Deteriorating

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Electrotherm (India) Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue and profit growth are shrinking (revenue growth −1.8% latest (single-quarter readings) against +30.0% at its 12-quarter best). The read is built from 10 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −10.3% in FY26, profit −103.6% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
44%339%26%199%8.7%59%−8.9%−80%−26%−220%%%−10.3%−103.6%FY16FY21FY26
44%339%26%199%8.7%59%−8.9%−80%−26%−220%%%−10.3%−103.6%FY16FY21FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
93%335%63%208%32%80%0.0%−47%−30%−175%%%−1.8%−92.5%−103.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
93%335%63%208%32%80%0.0%−47%−30%−175%%%−1.8%−92.5%−103.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Flat
latest −1.8% · span −21.2% to +30.0%
Profit growth
Recovering
latest −92.5% · span −100.0% to +100.0%

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−10.3%+6.3%+8.0%+5.8%
Share price+11.3%+129.3%+46.6%+29.6%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
−1.8%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Mar 26)
−92.5%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
5.8%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

24.3/100 — rank 16 of 17 in Steel Products · 67% evidence confidence

Electrotherm (India) Ltd scores 24.3 out of 100 against the 17 companies it is compared with in Steel Products, ranking 16. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 5.1 + 2.1 + 10 + 7.1 = 24.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Electrotherm (India) Ltd reported ₹1,140 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.8% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 5.8% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹3,692 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹3,692 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹3,692 Cr (−10.3% on the year), capping 10 years at 5.8% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹1,140 Cr, −1.8% year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹3,692 Cr (−10.3% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
5.8% a year over 10 years
RevenueYoY growth
4.6k44%3.5k26%2.3k8.7%1.2k−8.9%0−26%₹ Cr%₹3,692−10.3%FY16FY21FY26
4.6k44%3.5k26%2.3k8.7%1.2k−8.9%0−26%₹ Cr%₹3,692−10.3%FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹1,140 Cr (−1.8% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
1.3k93%98763%65832%3290.0%0−30%₹ Cr%₹1,140−1.8%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.3k93%98763%65832%3290.0%0−30%₹ Cr%₹1,140−1.8%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −9.8% growth against the decade's 5.8% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −10.3% over the last 4 quarters against −7.0%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Electrotherm (India) Ltd's operating margin is 2.1% in the Mar 26 quarter, −3.9 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −29.0% to 10.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 2.1%, −3.9 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −29.0%–10.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −3.4 pp year on year while gross margin went −1.8 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: 1.2% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 13-year window.
within a −29.0–10.0% band over 13 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
13%16%1.8%9.4%−9.5%3.1%−21%−3.2%−32%−9.5%%%1.2%−7.8%FY14FY20FY26
13%16%1.8%9.4%−9.5%3.1%−21%−3.2%−32%−9.5%%%1.2%−7.8%FY14FY20FY26
Mar 26: 2.1% operating margin (−3.9 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
13%6.5%8.8%1.1%4.3%−4.2%0.0%−9.5%−4.6%−15%%%2.1%−3.9%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13%6.5%8.8%1.1%4.3%−4.2%0.0%−9.5%−4.6%−15%%%2.1%−3.9%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Electrotherm (India) Ltd earned ₹14.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −92.5% year on year. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹16.0 Cr. That is 1.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹186 Cr. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was ₹14.0 Cr, −92.5% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−16.0 Cr (−103.6%).

FY26 profit ₹−16.0 Cr (−103.6% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
4925,018%3113,622%1312,226%−49830%−230−567%₹ Cr%₹−16−103.6%FY16FY21FY26
4925,018%3113,622%1312,226%−49830%−230−567%₹ Cr%₹−16−103.6%FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹14.0 Cr (−92.5% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
2041,554%1401,099%76644%11190%−53−265%₹ Cr%₹14−92.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
2041,554%1401,099%76644%11190%−53−265%₹ Cr%₹14−92.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −1.8% and the margin −3.9 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −111.0% vs revenue −9.8%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 112% of Electrotherm (India) Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹351 Cr of operating cash against ₹−16.0 Cr of profit. After ₹108 Cr of capital spending, ₹243 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹351 Cr against reported profit of ₹−16.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹243 Cr after ₹108 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 112% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹351 Cr vs profit ₹−16.0 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution.
112% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
492311131−49−230₹ Cr₹351₹−16₹243FY16FY21FY26
492311131−49−230₹ Cr₹351₹−16₹243FY16FY21FY26
FY26: CFO = 74% of profit (three-year rate 112%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash; outlier years shown pinned.
Conversion100%
318%253%187%121%56%%74%FY16FY21FY26
318%253%187%121%56%%74%FY16FY21FY26

Why conversion sits at 112%: the cash cycle tightened 20 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 1.7× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Electrotherm (India) Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 38 days in FY26, down from 58 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹234 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹3,692 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹10.1 Cr, so roughly ₹384 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 26 days, inventory at 77 days — roughly 2.5 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 38 days, tighter than FY21's 58.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 77 days to sell; customers pay about 26 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 65 days — netting out to the 38-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹3,692 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹10.1 Cr — so the 38-day loop keeps roughly ₹384 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 38-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 13-year window.
−20 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
34826017283−5days38d77d26d65dFY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
34826017283−5days38d77d26d65dFY14FY20FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹234 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹134 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹138 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹108 Cr, work-in-progress ₹138 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
1539842−14−69₹ Cr₹108₹138FY16FY18FY21FY23FY26
1539842−14−69₹ Cr₹108₹138FY16FY21FY26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

Electrotherm (India) Ltd earns a ROCE of 0% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −20% in FY15. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −12.8 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −0.4% net margin on 1.83× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 0%, recovered from a FY15 trough of −20% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −0.4% net margin × 1.83× asset turns × −13.07× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 9.6% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −0.8% − 12.0% = a −12.8 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE 0% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 12-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY15's −20%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
930%675%420%165%−90%%0%−0.8%FY15FY20FY26
930%675%420%165%−90%%0%−0.8%FY15FY20FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE 8.6% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
187%35%−117%−269%−422%%8.6%23.1%Q2 FY22Q4 FY24Q4 FY26
187%35%−117%−269%−422%%8.6%23.1%Q2 FY22Q4 FY24Q4 FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

Electrotherm (India) Ltd's net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from −1.93 in FY22 to −6.91 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹1,064 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹−154 Cr — a debt-to-equity of −6.91. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from −1.93 (FY22) to −6.91 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY26: debt ₹1,064 Cr at −6.91× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
2.3k−1.3×1.7k−3.1×1.1k−5.0×563−6.8×0−8.6×₹ Cr×₹1,064−6.91×FY22FY24FY26
2.3k−1.3×1.7k−3.1×1.1k−5.0×563−6.8×0−8.6×₹ Cr×₹1,064−6.91×FY22FY24FY26
Mar 26: debt ₹1,064 Cr, debt-to-equity −6.91 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
2.1k−1.3×1.6k−3.1×1.1k−5.0×536−6.8×0−8.6×₹ Cr×₹1,064−6.91×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
2.1k−1.3×1.6k−3.1×1.1k−5.0×536−6.8×0−8.6×₹ Cr×₹1,064−6.91×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions added 4.3 points of Electrotherm (India) Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 9.3% of the company. Promoters moved −1.2 points over the same window, to 29.9%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +4.3 points over 8 quarters to 9.3%; Promoters: −1.2 points over 8 quarters to 29.9%; Domestic institutions: +0.7 points over 8 quarters to 0.8%.

Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (+4.3 points), absorbed on the other side by promoters (−1.2 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters −1.1 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
70%52%33%14%−5.1%%29.9%5.9%0.8%63.5%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
70%52%33%14%−5.1%%29.9%5.9%0.8%63.5%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Foreign institutions added 4.3 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
71%52%33%14%−5.1%%29.9%9.3%0.8%60.1%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
71%52%33%14%−5.1%%29.9%9.3%0.8%60.1%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Electrotherm (India) Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Steel Products
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Shyam Metalics & Energy LtdSHYAMMETL 69.2/100Favorable setup97% evidence LEADER 26.3/35 Revenue 22.8% · PAT 21.3% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 13% · OPM 14% 95% evidence 12.3/20 P/E 25.6× · PEG 1.19 100% evidence 16.8/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench 14.5% · 1Y 6.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.3 + 13.8 + 12.3 + 16.8 = 69.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Raghav Productivity Enhancers LtdRPEL 68.6/100Favorable setup94% evidence TURNING 31.8/35 Revenue 34.3% · PAT 53.7% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 19.5/25 ROCE 30.3% · OPM 30% 100% evidence 5.2/20 P/E 89.1× · PEG 2.31 100% evidence 12.1/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench 41.8% · 1Y 83.6%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 31.8 + 19.5 + 5.2 + 12.1 = 68.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3Kamdhenu LtdKAMDHENU 67.0/100Favorable setup66% evidence LEADER 19.9/35 Revenue 34.5% · PAT 74.7% · OPM change -2 pp 35% evidence 16.3/25 ROCE 16.9% · OPM 7.2% 95% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 31.8× · PEG — 50% evidence 19.8/20 RS sector 18.2% · RS bench 30.6% · 1Y 14.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.9 + 16.3 + 11 + 19.8 = 67 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Sunflag Iron & Steel Company LtdSUNFLAG 64.0/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence LEADER 23.4/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT 25.3% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM 12% 100% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 31.6× · PEG 0.65 100% evidence 18.8/20 RS sector 15.5% · RS bench 27% · 1Y 28.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.4 + 10.3 + 11.5 + 18.8 = 64 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5BMW Industries Ltd542669 60.8/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.8/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 8% · OPM change 7 pp 83% evidence 15.1/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 28% 76% evidence 13.3/20 P/E 13.3× · PEG — 50% evidence 11.6/20 RS sector -2.8% · RS bench 6.7% · 1Y -7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.8 + 15.1 + 13.3 + 11.6 = 60.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Vardhman Special Steels LtdVSSL 57.7/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence LEADER 15.7/35 Revenue 6.3% · PAT 1.1% · OPM change 4.8 pp 100% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 16.5% · OPM 11.8% 100% evidence 15.0/20 P/E 32× · PEG 0.42 65% evidence 12.9/20 RS sector 0.2% · RS bench 11.1% · 1Y 18.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.7 + 14.1 + 15 + 12.9 = 57.7 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
7Rhetan TMT LtdRHETAN 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence89% evidence FADING 23.1/35 Revenue -34.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 76.5 pp 88% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 10.9% · OPM 29.9% 100% evidence 3.7/20 P/E 237× · PEG 3.94 65% evidence 13.8/20 RS sector 9.8% · RS bench 21.6% · 1Y 80.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.1 + 12.4 + 3.7 + 13.8 = 53 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Kalyani Steels LtdKSL 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence FADING 12.4/35 Revenue -6.9% · PAT 1.6% · OPM change -1 pp 88% evidence 17.4/25 ROCE 14.8% · OPM 20% 100% evidence 12.2/20 P/E 14.5× · PEG 1.01 100% evidence 10.3/20 RS sector -1.2% · RS bench 9.4% · 1Y -2.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.4 + 17.4 + 12.2 + 10.3 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Steel Exchange India LtdSTEELXIND 44.5/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence LEADER 11.8/35 Revenue -12.8% · PAT -8.8% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence 9.4/25 ROCE 10.9% · OPM 13% 95% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 45.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.9/20 RS sector 3.2% · RS bench 13.6% · 1Y 5.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.8 + 9.4 + 9.4 + 13.9 = 44.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 13.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
10Prakash Industries LtdPRAKASH 44.3/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence ASLEEP 12.1/35 Revenue -13.3% · PAT -6.2% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence 12.1/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM 16% 95% evidence 14.1/20 P/E 6.6× · PEG — 50% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -9.1% · RS bench -14.5% · 1Y -30.1%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 12.1 + 14.1 + 6 = 44.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
11Gallantt Ispat Ltd.GALLANTT 34.9/100Adverse evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 8.8/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT -3.8% · OPM change -6 pp 100% evidence 16.7/25 ROCE 18.2% · OPM 16% 100% evidence 6.9/20 P/E 34× · PEG 1.7 100% evidence 2.5/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y -3.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 8.8 + 16.7 + 6.9 + 2.5 = 34.9 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
12Salasar Techno Engineering LtdSALASAR 33.7/100Adverse evidence69% evidence ASLEEP 13.3/35 Revenue 4.9% · PAT -33.3% · OPM change -2.9 pp 62% evidence 8.2/25 ROCE 8.1% · OPM 3.1% 95% evidence 8.3/20 P/E 59.3× · PEG — 50% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -16.5% · RS bench -27.2% · 1Y -19.7%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.3 + 8.2 + 8.3 + 3.9 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Panchmahal Steel LtdPANCHMSTEL 33.3/100Adverse evidence61% evidence ASLEEP 15.2/35 Revenue 0.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3.5 pp 62% evidence 4.3/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 3.5% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -11.7% · RS bench -1.6% · 1Y 18.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.2 + 4.3 + 10 + 3.8 = 33.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Jindal Steel LtdJINDALSTEL 33.0/100Adverse evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 12.3/35 Revenue 16.5% · PAT -9.8% · OPM change -7 pp 100% evidence 9.7/25 ROCE 9.7% · OPM 17% 100% evidence 6.1/20 P/E 36.4× · PEG 2.69 100% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench -1.2% · 1Y 10.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.3 + 9.7 + 6.1 + 4.9 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Beekay Steel Industries LtdBEEKAY 30.2/100Adverse evidence77% evidence ASLEEP 9.6/35 Revenue 9.3% · PAT -58.9% · OPM change -2 pp 83% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 7% 95% evidence 8.2/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 4.7/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -7.2% · 1Y -19.4%1 of 6 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.6 + 7.7 + 8.2 + 4.7 = 30.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Electrotherm (India) Ltdthis pageELECTHERM 24.3/100Adverse evidence67% evidence TURNING 5.1/35 Revenue -10.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3.9 pp 83% evidence 2.1/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 2.1% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 7.1/20 RS sector -28.1% · RS bench 13.4% · 1Y -1.5%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 5.1 + 2.1 + 10 + 7.1 = 24.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17Banganga Paper Industries LtdBANGANGA 45.4/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence 19.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -2 pp 40% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 27% · OPM 5.7% 57% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 347× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -30.2% · RS bench -32.7% · 1Y -46.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.7 + 14.2 + 8.5 + 3 = 45.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Electrotherm (India) Ltd's share price today?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd trades at ₹1,008, +11.3% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹1,284 Cr. The stock sits at 70% of its 52-week range of ₹567–₹1,200, +11.0% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 7 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were Electrotherm (India) Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd reported revenue of ₹1,140 Cr and net profit of ₹14.0 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue fell 1.8% and profit fell 92.5% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹10.70. The operating margin was 2.1%, 3.9 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Electrotherm (India) Ltd's revenue?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd reported revenue of ₹1,140 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.8% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹3,692 Cr (−10.3%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 5.8% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Electrotherm (India) Ltd's profit?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd earned ₹14.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −92.5% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−16.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 2.1% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Electrotherm (India) Ltd's market cap?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹1,284 Cr at a share price of ₹1,008. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Electrotherm (India) Ltd's P/E ratio?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd trades at a P/E of 18.4×, at the 97th percentile of its own 7-year range, against a long-run median of 2.8×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Electrotherm (India) Ltd pay a dividend?

No — Electrotherm (India) Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Electrotherm (India) Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Electrotherm (India) Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 18.4× sits at the 97th percentile of its 7-year range (long-run median 2.8×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Electrotherm (India) Ltd growing?

Not right now — Electrotherm (India) Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −1.8% year on year, profit −92.5%, and the margin −3.9 pp at 2.1%. The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 31 July 2026.

How is Electrotherm (India) Ltd performing?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 7 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 1.8% and profit fell 92.5% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

What stage is Electrotherm (India) Ltd in?

Deteriorating — revenue and profit growth are shrinking (revenue growth −1.8% latest (single-quarter readings) against +30.0% at its 12-quarter best). The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −1.8% latest, profit growth −92.5% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Electrotherm (India) Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 7 of stage 2), trading +11.0% versus its 200-day average and at 70% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Electrotherm (India) Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Electrotherm (India) Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +2,067% against the NIFTY 500's +276% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.

Will Electrotherm (India) Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Electrotherm (India) Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹1,008, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 7 weeks in. Its P/E of 18.4× sits at the 97th percentile of its own 7-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns Electrotherm (India) Ltd?

Promoters hold 29.9% of Electrotherm (India) Ltd, foreign institutions 9.3%, domestic institutions 0.8% and the public 60.1% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions added 4.3 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Electrotherm (India) Ltd have too much debt?

No — Electrotherm (India) Ltd's debt-to-equity is −6.91, and operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. FY26 borrowings were ₹1,064 Cr against equity of ₹−154 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Electrotherm (India) Ltd's capex?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd spent ₹234 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹108 Cr, with ₹138 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Electrotherm (India) Ltd's cash flow?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd generated ₹351 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹243 Cr of free cash flow after ₹108 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−16.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Electrotherm (India) Ltd's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 112% of Electrotherm (India) Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹351 Cr against reported profit of ₹−16.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is Electrotherm (India) Ltd in its business cycle?

Electrotherm (India) Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 1.2%, against a 13-year band of −29.0%–10.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 2.1%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the Electrotherm (India) Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +11.3% in a year while annual EPS moved −103.5% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Electrotherm (India) Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Electrotherm (India) Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI