Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

GTL Infrastructure Ltd

GTLINFRA
Telecom Services

GTL Infrastructure Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. The latest quarter's headline profit is a one-off item (larger than a full quarter's revenue), not money the business earned. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.

Biggest watch item: the price is already 7 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (7 weeks in). But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. The latest quarter's profit is a one-off, not an operating recovery. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.

Price
₹1.2
−19.1% 1Y
Revenue (Mar 26)
₹330 Cr
−2.1% YoY
Profit (Mar 26), incl. one-off
₹1,186 Cr
one-off item — see below
Operating margin
15.0%
+1.0 pp YoY
ROCE
−12%
FY26
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

GTL Infrastructure Ltd trades at ₹1.2, in a confirmed uptrend and 7 weeks into that stage. That is −7.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 39% of a 52-week range of ₹1 to ₹2. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (5 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 7 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹1.2 it trades −7.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 39% of its 52-week range (₹1–₹2).

Jul 26: ₹1.2 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−7.5% versus the 200-day line, week 7 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S4S2S4₹4.4₹3.4₹2.4₹1.5₹0.5₹1₹1Jul 23May 24Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
S4S2S4₹4.4₹3.4₹2.4₹1.5₹0.5₹1₹1Jul 23Feb 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (546 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 16Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved −44% while the NIFTY 500 moved +276% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (5 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-01) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

P/E does not price GTL Infrastructure Ltd — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. On sales the market values GTL Infrastructure Ltd at 1.1× its FY26 revenue of ₹1,372 Cr.

With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.

P/E
earnings negative

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

GTL Infrastructure Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 10 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +2.1% in FY26 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoY
165%111%57%3.3%−51%%2.1%FY16FY21FY26
165%111%57%3.3%−51%%2.1%FY16FY21FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising
Revenue
7.5%2.1%−3.2%−8.5%−14%%−2.1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
7.5%2.1%−3.2%−8.5%−14%%−2.1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Flat
latest −2.1% · span −12.4% to +6.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

The latest quarter’s profit carries a one-off item larger than the operating base, so the profit curve is shown but does not vote in the stage call.

The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+2.1%−2.0%−0.5%+4.2%
Share price−19.1%+17.9%−18.6%−7.2%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
−2.1%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
4.2%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

33.5/100 — rank 16 of 18 in Telecom Services · 62% evidence confidence

GTL Infrastructure Ltd scores 33.5 out of 100 against the 18 companies it is compared with in Telecom Services, ranking 16. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 11.9 + 4.6 + 11.5 + 5.5 = 33.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

GTL Infrastructure Ltd reported ₹330 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, −2.1% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 4.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,372 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,372 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,372 Cr (+2.1% on the year), capping 10 years at 4.2% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹330 Cr, −2.1% year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹1,372 Cr (+2.1% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
4.2% a year over 10 years
RevenueYoY growth
2.5k165%1.9k111%1.3k57%6303.3%0−51%₹ Cr%₹1,3722.1%FY16FY21FY26
2.5k165%1.9k111%1.3k57%6303.3%0−51%₹ Cr%₹1,3722.1%FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹330 Cr (−2.1% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
3847.5%2882.1%192−3.2%96−8.5%0−14%₹ Cr%₹330−2.1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
3847.5%2882.1%192−3.2%96−8.5%0−14%₹ Cr%₹330−2.1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +2.1% growth against the decade's 4.2% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +2.2% over the last 4 quarters against +0.0%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

GTL Infrastructure Ltd's operating margin is 15.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 12.0% to 44.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 15.0%, +1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 12.0%–44.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: 24.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 13-year window.
within a 12.0–44.0% band over 13 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
47%25%37%13%28%1.5%19%−10%9.4%−22%%%24%3%FY14FY20FY26
47%25%37%13%28%1.5%19%−10%9.4%−22%%%24%3%FY14FY20FY26
Mar 26: 15.0% operating margin (+1.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
41%69%33%44%26%19%18%−5.9%9.8%−31%%%15%1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
41%69%33%44%26%19%18%−5.9%9.8%−31%%%15%1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

GTL Infrastructure Ltd earned ₹1,186 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. That quarter carries a one-off item larger than its own revenue, so the year-on-year figure is an artefact rather than a trading result. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹779 Cr. That is 359.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹249 Cr.

Mar 26 profit was ₹1,186 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹779 Cr (null).

🚨 Read this profit with care: at ₹1,186 Cr it is larger than the whole quarter's revenue of ₹330 Cr — no operating business earns more than it sells, so this is a one-off item (a debt-to-equity conversion, a tax write-back or an asset sale), not money the business earned. The underlying operations are running at 15.0% operating margin; the year-on-year jump and any P/E built on this number are artefacts of the one-off, not a real earnings turn.

FY26 profit ₹779 Cr (null YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profit
993218−557−1.3k−2.1k₹ Cr₹779FY16FY21FY26
993218−557−1.3k−2.1k₹ Cr₹779FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹1,186 Cr (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)
1.3k88546952−364₹ Cr₹1,186Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.3k88546952−364₹ Cr₹1,186Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

GTL Infrastructure Ltd's cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY26 that was ₹535 Cr of operating cash against ₹779 Cr of profit. After ₹60.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹475 Cr was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

FY26: operating cash of ₹535 Cr against reported profit of ₹779 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹475 Cr after ₹60.0 Cr of capital spending.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹535 Cr vs profit ₹779 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution. FY17 reflects an acquisition year — point shown clipped.
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
2.2k1.1k0−1.1k−2.2k₹ Cr₹535₹779₹475FY16FY21FY26
2.2k1.1k0−1.1k−2.2k₹ Cr₹535₹779₹475FY16FY21FY26
FY26: CFO = 69% of profit Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
102%93%85%76%67%%69%FY16FY21FY26
102%93%85%76%67%%69%FY16FY21FY26

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

GTL Infrastructure Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 11 days in FY26, down from 27 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹207 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,372 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹3.8 Cr, so roughly ₹41.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 11 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 11 days, tighter than FY21's 27.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,372 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹3.8 Cr — so the 11-day loop keeps roughly ₹41.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 11-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 13-year window.
−16 days vs FY21
Cash cycleDebtor days
906948265days11d11dFY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
906948265days11d11dFY14FY20FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹207 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹759 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹60.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹0.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
steady investment
CapexWork-in-progress
8.1k5.6k3.1k599−1.9k₹ Cr₹60₹0FY16FY18FY21FY23FY26
8.1k5.6k3.1k599−1.9k₹ Cr₹60₹0FY16FY21FY26

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

GTL Infrastructure Ltd earns a ROCE of −12% in FY23. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 56.8% net margin on 0.44× asset turns.

FY23 ROCE is −12%.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 56.8% net margin × 0.44× asset turns × −0.60× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −15.0% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

FY23: ROCE −12% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line). 10-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the full ladder
ROCEWACC
14%7.0%0.0%−7.0%−14%%−12%FY14FY18FY23
14%7.0%0.0%−7.0%−14%%−12%FY14FY18FY23
Q4 FY26: ROCE −48.2% (TTM) Trailing-twelve-month ROCE, per quarter, %. Last 9 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)
14%−2.5%−19%−36%−53%%−48.2%Q2 FY22Q4 FY24Q4 FY26
14%−2.5%−19%−36%−53%%−48.2%Q2 FY22Q4 FY24Q4 FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

GTL Infrastructure Ltd's net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from −1.77 in FY22 to −1.13 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹5,898 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹−5,215 Cr — a debt-to-equity of −1.13. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from −1.77 (FY22) to −1.13 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY26: debt ₹5,898 Cr at −1.13× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
6.4k−0.5×4.8k−0.9×3.2k−1.2×1.6k−1.5×0−1.9×₹ Cr×₹5,898−1.13×FY22FY24FY26
6.4k−0.5×4.8k−0.9×3.2k−1.2×1.6k−1.5×0−1.9×₹ Cr×₹5,898−1.13×FY22FY24FY26
Mar 26: debt ₹5,898 Cr, debt-to-equity −1.13 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
6.4k−0.5×4.8k−0.7×3.2k−1.0×1.6k−1.2×0−1.5×₹ Cr×₹5,898−1.13×Sep 22Sep 24Mar 26
6.4k−0.5×4.8k−0.7×3.2k−1.0×1.6k−1.2×0−1.5×₹ Cr×₹5,898−1.13×Sep 22Sep 24Mar 26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Domestic institutions cut 11.0 points of GTL Infrastructure Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 31.2% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +0.6 points over the same window, to 0.8%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −11.0 points over 8 quarters to 31.2%; Foreign institutions: +0.6 points over 8 quarters to 0.8%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 3.3%. Note the structure: promoters hold under 20% — this is a widely-held company where institutions, not a family, set the direction.

🚨 Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (−11.0 points), absorbed on the other side by foreign institutions (+0.6 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +0.0 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
71%52%33%14%−5.2%%3.3%0.1%31.3%65.4%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
71%52%33%14%−5.2%%3.3%0.1%31.3%65.4%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Domestic institutions cut 11.0 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
71%52%33%14%−5.2%%3.3%0.8%31.2%64.8%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
71%52%33%14%−5.2%%3.3%0.8%31.2%64.8%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

GTL Infrastructure Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Telecom Services
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Bharti Airtel LtdBHARTIARTL 71.9/100Favorable setup83% evidence TURNING 23.0/35 Revenue 22% · PAT -9.8% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence 21.5/25 ROCE 17.6% · OPM 57% 100% evidence 14.2/20 P/E 46.2× · PEG 0.65 65% evidence 13.2/20 RS sector 11.6% · RS bench 0.1% · 1Y 1.8%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23 + 21.5 + 14.2 + 13.2 = 71.9 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Suyog Telematics LtdSUYOG 68.1/100Favorable setup68% evidence BREAKING OUT 23.5/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 57.5% · OPM change 59 pp 62% evidence 17.7/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 75% 95% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.3/20 RS sector 7% · RS bench 15.9% · 1Y 0.8%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.5 + 17.7 + 10.6 + 16.3 = 68.1 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3Valiant Communications Ltd526775 67.9/100Favorable setup71% evidence FADING 29.9/35 Revenue 66.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.6 pp 83% evidence 20.3/25 ROCE 39.7% · OPM 38.2% 76% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 45.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.3/20 RS sector -3.9% · RS bench 4.3% · 1Y 56.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 29.9 + 20.3 + 10.4 + 7.3 = 67.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4HFCL LtdHFCL 65.1/100Favorable setup74% evidence LEADER 25.8/35 Revenue 58.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 18.7 pp 71% evidence 13.1/25 ROCE 10.9% · OPM 22% 76% evidence 6.2/20 P/E 51.8× · PEG — 50% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 76.3% · RS bench 86.7% · 1Y 155.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.8 + 13.1 + 6.2 + 20 = 65.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Bharti Hexacom LtdBHARTIHEXA 60.5/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence TURNING 22.3/35 Revenue 9.4% · PAT 16.1% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence 21.2/25 ROCE 21.4% · OPM 52% 100% evidence 6.0/20 P/E 47.3× · PEG 3.46 65% evidence 11.0/20 RS sector 3.1% · RS bench -3.9% · 1Y -9.6%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 22.3 + 21.2 + 6 + 11 = 60.5 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
6ADC India Communications LtdKRONECOMM 51.4/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence LEADER 12.0/35 Revenue 6.9% · PAT -22.6% · OPM change 0.8 pp 83% evidence 16.9/25 ROCE 31.4% · OPM 7.3% 76% evidence 6.2/20 P/E 52.2× · PEG — 50% evidence 16.3/20 RS sector 18.4% · RS bench 27.1% · 1Y 78.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12 + 16.9 + 6.2 + 16.3 = 51.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 27.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
7Indus Towers LtdINDUSTOWER 51.1/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 9.5/35 Revenue 6.7% · PAT -26.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence 20.6/25 ROCE 19.5% · OPM 53% 100% evidence 16.6/20 P/E 14.4× · PEG 0.46 100% evidence 4.4/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y -0.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.5 + 20.6 + 16.6 + 4.4 = 51.1 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
8Vodafone Idea LtdIDEA 49.9/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence LEADER 15.9/35 Revenue 3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 65% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE -1.6% · OPM 43% 100% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 4× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.6/20 RS sector 11.6% · RS bench 20.7% · 1Y 80.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 8.1 + 11.3 + 14.6 = 49.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 20.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
9Sar Televenture LtdSARTELE 49.9/100Mixed-negative evidence70% evidence ASLEEP 21.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 48% evidence 12.6/25 ROCE 8.8% · OPM 17% 95% evidence 14.6/20 P/E 8.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 1.5/20 RS sector -39.9% · RS bench -33.9% · 1Y -44.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.2 + 12.6 + 14.6 + 1.5 = 49.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Tata Communications LtdTATACOMM 46.1/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence TURNING 12.9/35 Revenue 8.3% · PAT -44.8% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 14.4/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 19% 100% evidence 8.4/20 P/E 48.1× · PEG 2.22 65% evidence 10.4/20 RS sector -1.7% · RS bench 0.9% · 1Y 1.6%10 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 14.4 + 8.4 + 10.4 = 46.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) LtdTTML 40.6/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence ASLEEP 20.7/35 Revenue 11.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3.1 pp 71% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE -12.7% · OPM 54.7% 95% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 207.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.4/20 RS sector -28.2% · RS bench -16.8% · 1Y -35.1%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.7 + 6.8 + 8.7 + 4.4 = 40.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12ITI LtdITI 36.8/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 19.4/35 Revenue -39.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 7 pp 65% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 4.3% 100% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 92.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.1/20 RS sector -15.6% · RS bench -8.1% · 1Y -8.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.4 + 5.4 + 8.9 + 3.1 = 36.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Tejas Networks LtdTEJASNET 34.9/100Adverse evidence71% evidence BREAKING OUT 11.8/35 Revenue -80% · PAT -80% · OPM change 42 pp 74% evidence 1.9/25 ROCE -14.6% · OPM -25% 100% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 11.2/20 RS sector -5.4% · RS bench 2.2% · 1Y -14.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.8 + 1.9 + 10 + 11.2 = 34.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14NELCO LtdNELCO 34.0/100Adverse evidence74% evidence TURNING 8.5/35 Revenue 2% · PAT -43% · OPM change 0.1 pp 95% evidence 7.8/25 ROCE 7.2% · OPM 10.4% 95% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 388× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.2/20 RS sector -21.7% · RS bench 31.2% · 1Y 18.8%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 8.5 + 7.8 + 8.5 + 9.2 = 34 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15OnMobile Global LtdONMOBILE 33.6/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence TURNING 9.4/35 Revenue -9.8% · PAT 72.5% · OPM change -33.5 pp 62% evidence 4.2/25 ROCE -0.1% · OPM -33% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector -4.7% · RS bench 10.1% · 1Y 22.1%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.4 + 4.2 + 10 + 10 = 33.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16GTL Infrastructure Ltdthis pageGTLINFRA 33.5/100Adverse evidence62% evidence ASLEEP 11.9/35 Revenue 2.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 62% evidence 4.6/25 ROCE -48.2% · OPM 15% 95% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 2.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.5/20 RS sector -16.3% · RS bench -7.5% · 1Y -23.1%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.9 + 4.6 + 11.5 + 5.5 = 33.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17Mahanagar Telephone Nigam LtdMTNL 33.5/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence ASLEEP 13.5/35 Revenue -5.7% · PAT 6.6% · OPM change 22 pp 62% evidence 6.5/25 ROCE -2.3% · OPM 16% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -32.3% · RS bench -22.7% · 1Y -43.2%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.5 + 6.5 + 10 + 3.5 = 33.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Optiemus Infracom LtdOPTIEMUS 32.2/100Adverse evidence83% evidence TURNING 11.1/35 Revenue -6.5% · PAT 4.8% · OPM change -3.5 pp 88% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE 10.9% · OPM 1.5% 100% evidence 4.1/20 P/E 86.2× · PEG 9.11 65% evidence 8.1/20 RS sector -30.5% · RS bench 26.6% · 1Y 11.3%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.1 + 8.9 + 4.1 + 8.1 = 32.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is GTL Infrastructure Ltd's share price today?

GTL Infrastructure Ltd trades at ₹1.2, −19.1% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹1,576 Cr. The stock sits at 39% of its 52-week range of ₹1–₹2, −7.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 7 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were GTL Infrastructure Ltd's latest quarterly results?

GTL Infrastructure Ltd reported revenue of ₹330 Cr and net profit of ₹1,186 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹0.93. The operating margin was 15.0%, 1.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is GTL Infrastructure Ltd's revenue?

GTL Infrastructure Ltd reported revenue of ₹330 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, −2.1% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹1,372 Cr (+2.1%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 4.2% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is GTL Infrastructure Ltd's profit?

GTL Infrastructure Ltd earned ₹1,186 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹779 Cr. The operating margin ran 15.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is GTL Infrastructure Ltd's market cap?

GTL Infrastructure Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹1,576 Cr at a share price of ₹1.2. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does GTL Infrastructure Ltd pay a dividend?

No — GTL Infrastructure Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.

How is GTL Infrastructure Ltd performing?

GTL Infrastructure Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 7 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 5 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is GTL Infrastructure Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 7 of stage 2), trading −7.5% versus its 200-day average and at 39% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Is GTL Infrastructure Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view GTL Infrastructure Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (5 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-01), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved −44% against the NIFTY 500's +276% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.

Will GTL Infrastructure Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for GTL Infrastructure Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹1.2, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 7 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns GTL Infrastructure Ltd?

Promoters hold 3.3% of GTL Infrastructure Ltd, foreign institutions 0.8%, domestic institutions 31.2% and the public 64.8% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions cut 11.0 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does GTL Infrastructure Ltd have too much debt?

No — GTL Infrastructure Ltd's debt-to-equity is −1.13, and operating profit covers the interest bill 1×. FY26 borrowings were ₹5,898 Cr against equity of ₹−5,215 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.

What is GTL Infrastructure Ltd's capex?

GTL Infrastructure Ltd spent ₹207 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹60.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is GTL Infrastructure Ltd's cash flow?

GTL Infrastructure Ltd generated ₹535 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹475 Cr of free cash flow after ₹60.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹779 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is GTL Infrastructure Ltd in its business cycle?

GTL Infrastructure Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 24.0%, against a 13-year band of 12.0%–44.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 15.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the GTL Infrastructure Ltd story?

Biggest watch item: the price is already 7 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is GTL Infrastructure Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: GTL Infrastructure Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. The latest quarter's headline profit is a one-off item (larger than a full quarter's revenue), not money the business earned. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI