Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-11
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11

Sigma Advanced System Ltd

SIGMAADV
Aerospace & Defence - Equipments

Sigma Advanced System Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −69% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (67 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 79th percentile of its own 10-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit −74.3% year on year, and −69% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.

Price
₹832
+429.3% 1Y
P/E
95.1×
79th pctile
of its own 10-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹374 Cr
+7,380.0% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹35.0 Cr
−74.3% YoY
Operating margin
16.0%
+307.0 pp YoY
ROCE
61%
FY26
Cash conversion
−69%
of profit, last 3 FY
Withheld from this page: Part of this page is deliberately not drawn: its two data sources disagree by up to 3,592% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so nothing from the second source is placed here — the quarterly PEG curve, the quarterly return curves, the annual return-on-invested-capital overlay, the total-debt and debt-to-equity series and the F-score and the return-on-invested-capital reading are absent for that reason. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data. The quarterly history also begins where the primary source begins: 5 earlier quarters the second source carries are not spliced in front of it. Extending a reported profit series is stricter than showing a ratio chart — it needs a source that has been checked.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Sigma Advanced System Ltd trades at ₹832, in a confirmed uptrend and 67 weeks into that stage. That is +98.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of ₹145 to ₹832. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 28 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 67 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹832 it trades +98.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range (₹145–₹832).

Sep 26: ₹832 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+98.2% versus the 200-day line, week 67 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4S2S4S2₹896₹665₹434₹203₹−27.6₹832₹420Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Jan 26Sep 26
S2S4S2S4S2₹896₹665₹434₹203₹−27.6₹832₹420Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (555 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 16Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +14,277% while the NIFTY 500 moved +267% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 28 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Sigma Advanced System Ltd trades at 95.1× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (79th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 49.5×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 95.1× is at the pricey end of its own range (79th percentile), against a long-run median of 49.5× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 95.1× vs a 49.5× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 10.4-year window; loss-period spikes above 149× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
at the pricey end of its own range (79th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
159.9×₹23.0119.9×₹17.279.9×₹11.540.0×₹5.70.0×₹0.0×80.30×₹10Apr 16Dec 18Jan 21Apr 23Sep 26
159.9×₹23.0119.9×₹17.279.9×₹11.540.0×₹5.70.0×₹0.0×80.30×₹10Apr 16Jan 21Sep 26
P/E
95.1×
79th percentile of 10y

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +110.0%/yr price move, ~+94.8%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+15.2 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the +50.9%/yr price move, ~+50.8%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+0.1 pp from the multiple (roughly flat). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 3,592% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

03 · What the price assumes

What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.

Solved at its 13 June 2026 price, Sigma Advanced System Ltd was paying for profit growth of about 17.5% a year. Profit itself has compounded 74.9% a year over the past 10 years. Today the market pays 95.1× P/E, the 79th percentile of its own 10-year range.

What the two numbers say together. The multiple is full against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is below what this company has actually delivered.

How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 13 June 2026, not a running figure — every other number on this page, the multiple included, is read off the live quote as of 11 September 2026. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements.

04 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Sigma Advanced System Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 6 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −100.0% in FY24, profit −244.4% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
15%236%−16%107%−47%−22%−78%−151%−109%−280%%%−100%−244.4%FY16FY21FY26
15%236%−16%107%−47%−22%−78%−151%−109%−280%%%−100%−244.4%FY16FY21FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
RevenueProfitEPS
301.2%348%300.6%174%300.0%0.0%299.4%−174%298.8%−348%%%300%−74.3%−51.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
301.2%348%300.6%174%300.0%0.0%299.4%−174%298.8%−348%%%300%−74.3%−51.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
65%50%35%19%3.8%%61%FY23FY24FY26
65%50%35%19%3.8%%61%FY23FY24FY26
ROCE
Rising
latest 61.0% · span 8.0%–61.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+526.6%+52.8%+22.8%
Profit+210.0%+166.3%+74.9%
EPS+133.2%+127.4%+55.8%
Share price+429.3%+155.9%+110.0%+50.9%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+7,380.0%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
−74.3%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
22.8%
long-run compound pace
05 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

77.9/100 — rank 1 of 25 in Aerospace & Defence - Equipments · 82% evidence confidence

Sigma Advanced System Ltd scores 77.9 out of 100 against the 25 companies it is compared with in Aerospace & Defence - Equipments, ranking 1. Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 28.4 + 17.2 + 12.5 + 19.8 = 77.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

06 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Sigma Advanced System Ltd reported ₹374 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +7,380.0% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 22.8% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹492 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹861 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹492 Cr (null on the year), capping 10 years at 22.8% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹374 Cr, +7,380.0% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue ₹492 Cr (null YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
22.8% a year over 10 years
RevenueYoY growth
53115%399−16%266−47%133−78%0−109%₹ Cr%₹492−100%FY16FY21FY26
53115%399−16%266−47%133−78%0−109%₹ Cr%₹492−100%FY16FY21FY26
Jun 26: ₹374 Cr (+7,380.0% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
3rd straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
4047,933%3035,928%2023,923%1011,918%0−86%₹ Cr%₹3747,380%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
4047,933%3035,928%2023,923%1011,918%0−86%₹ Cr%₹3747,380%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +2,838.4% growth against the decade's 22.8% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

07 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Sigma Advanced System Ltd's operating margin is 16.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +307.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −898.0% to 25.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 16.0%, +307.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −898.0%–25.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +307.1 pp year on year while gross margin went −3.6 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: 10.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 12-year window.
within a −898.0–25.0% band over 12 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
99%1,054%−169%539%−437%25%−704%−490%−972%−1,005%%%10%−4%Dec 13FY19FY26
99%1,054%−169%539%−437%25%−704%−490%−972%−1,005%%%10%−4%Dec 13FY19FY26
Jun 26: 16.0% operating margin (+307.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
55%333%−38%240%−131%148%−224%55%−317%−38%%%16%307%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
55%333%−38%240%−131%148%−224%55%−317%−38%%%16%307%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
08 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Sigma Advanced System Ltd earned ₹35.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −74.3% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹268 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 74.9%. That is 9.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹136 Cr. 6 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Jun 26 profit was ₹35.0 Cr, −74.3% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹268 Cr (null), and the 10-year compound rate is 74.9%.

FY26 profit ₹268 Cr (null YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
74.9% a year over 10 years
Net profitYoY growth
292236%205107%119−22%33−151%−54−280%₹ Cr%₹268−244.4%FY16FY21FY26
292236%205107%119−22%33−151%−54−280%₹ Cr%₹268−244.4%FY16FY21FY26
Jun 26: ₹35.0 Cr (−74.3% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
1481,481%104905%60328%15−249%−29−826%₹ Cr%₹35−74.3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
1481,481%104905%60328%15−249%−29−826%₹ Cr%₹35−74.3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +7,380.0% and the margin +307.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +377.9% vs revenue +2,838.4%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

09 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years −69% of Sigma Advanced System Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹−225 Cr of operating cash against ₹268 Cr of profit. After ₹148 Cr of capital spending, ₹−373 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹−225 Cr against reported profit of ₹268 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−373 Cr after ₹148 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −69% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹−225 Cr vs profit ₹268 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution. FY22 reflects an acquisition year — point shown clipped.
−69% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
319133−53−238−424₹ Cr₹−225₹268₹−373FY16FY21FY26
319133−53−238−424₹ Cr₹−225₹268₹−373FY16FY21FY26
FY26: CFO = −84% of profit (three-year rate −69%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash; outlier years shown pinned.
Conversion100%
331%219%108%0.0%−115%%−84%FY16FY21FY26
331%219%108%0.0%−115%%−84%FY16FY21FY26

🚨 Why conversion sits at −69%: the cash cycle tightened 74 days between FY19 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 8.4× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

10 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Sigma Advanced System Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 271 days in FY26, down from 345 days in FY19. Capital spending ran ₹176 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹492 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.3 Cr, so roughly ₹365 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 270 days, inventory at 382 days — roughly 12.6 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 271 days, tighter than FY19's 345.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 382 days to sell; customers pay about 270 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 381 days — netting out to the 271-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹492 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.3 Cr — so the 271-day loop keeps roughly ₹365 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 271-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 11-year window.
−74 days vs FY19
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
44432520686−33days271d382d270d381dDec 13FY16FY19FY21FY26
44432520686−33days271d382d270d381dDec 13FY19FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹176 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹21.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹9.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹148 Cr, work-in-progress ₹9.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
163109540−55₹ Cr₹148₹9FY16FY18FY21FY23FY26
163109540−55₹ Cr₹148₹9FY16FY21FY26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

11 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Sigma Advanced System Ltd earns a ROCE of 61% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 0% in FY17. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 54.5% net margin on 0.46× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 61%, recovered from a FY17 trough of 0% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 54.5% net margin × 0.46× asset turns × 2.26× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 56.7% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

FY26: ROCE 61% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line). 13-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY17's 0%
ROCEWACC
66%48%31%13%−4.9%%61%Dec 13FY17FY20FY23FY26
66%48%31%13%−4.9%%61%Dec 13FY20FY26

The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 3,592% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Sigma Advanced System Ltd carries ₹332 Cr of borrowings against ₹468 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.71. Operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹34.0 Cr to ₹332 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹176 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹332 Cr against equity of ₹468 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.71. Operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹34.0 Cr to ₹332 Cr while capital spending ran ₹176 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.

FY26: borrowings ₹332 Cr at 0.71× equity Borrowings by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 13-year window. Quarterly balance-sheet history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
the debt trajectory
BorrowingsDebt-to-equity
3591.0×2690.8×1790.6×900.3×00.1×₹ Cr×₹3320.71×Dec 13FY17FY20FY23FY26
3591.0×2690.8×1790.6×900.3×00.1×₹ Cr×₹3320.71×Dec 13FY20FY26

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 3,592% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

13 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters added 31.2 points of Sigma Advanced System Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 66.2% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +0.0 points over the same window, to 0.1%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: +31.2 points over 8 quarters to 66.2%; Foreign institutions: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 0.1%; Domestic institutions: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%.

Why the register moved: promoters drove it (+31.2 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +27.7 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
77%56%36%15%−5.7%%71.2%0.1%0%28.7%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
77%56%36%15%−5.7%%71.2%0.1%0%28.7%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Promoters added 31.2 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
77%56%36%15%−5.7%%66.2%0.1%0.0%33.6%Dec 23Jun 25Jul 26
77%56%36%15%−5.7%%66.2%0.1%0.0%33.6%Dec 23Jun 25Jul 26
14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Sigma Advanced System Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

15 · Related companies · Aerospace & Defence - Equipments
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Sigma Advanced System Ltdthis pageSIGMAADV 77.9/100Favorable setup82% evidence LEADER 28.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 20.3% · OPM change 307 pp 95% evidence 17.2/25 ROCE 60.8% · OPM 16% 76% evidence 12.5/20 P/E 95.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 19.8/20 RS sector 113.1% · RS bench 161.3% · 1Y 481.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 28.4 + 17.2 + 12.5 + 19.8 = 77.9 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Paras Defence and Space Technologies LtdPARAS 70.7/100Favorable setup82% evidence LEADER 25.8/35 Revenue 36.6% · PAT 54.8% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence 17.1/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 25% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 125× · PEG — 50% evidence 18.8/20 RS sector 29.1% · RS bench 66.5% · 1Y 117.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.8 + 17.1 + 9 + 18.8 = 70.7 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3MTAR Technologies LtdMTARTECH 67.2/100Favorable setup90% evidence TURNING 30.4/35 Revenue 53.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 6 pp 100% evidence 15.3/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 24% 100% evidence 8.0/20 P/E 165× · PEG — 50% evidence 13.5/20 RS sector 29.8% · RS bench 63% · 1Y 419.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 30.4 + 15.3 + 8 + 13.5 = 67.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Azad Engineering LtdAZAD 64.0/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence LEADER 24.2/35 Revenue 29% · PAT 41.4% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 37% 100% evidence 8.2/20 P/E 132× · PEG 2.29 65% evidence 18.8/20 RS sector 15.1% · RS bench 50.7% · 1Y 80.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.2 + 12.8 + 8.2 + 18.8 = 64 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Rossell Techsys LtdROSSTECH 62.9/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence BREAKING OUT 28.8/35 Revenue 82.9% · PAT 68.8% · OPM change 1.8 pp 100% evidence 8.0/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 14.4% 100% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 173× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.2/20 RS sector 13.1% · RS bench 48.2% · 1Y 69.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 28.8 + 8 + 8.9 + 17.2 = 62.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Sika Interplant Systems LtdSIKA 62.4/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.1/35 Revenue 0.5% · PAT 9.8% · OPM change 1.1 pp 100% evidence 21.9/25 ROCE 34.6% · OPM 19.5% 100% evidence 13.0/20 P/E 66.4× · PEG 1.01 100% evidence 8.4/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench 7.8% · 1Y -4.3%8 of 9 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.1 + 21.9 + 13 + 8.4 = 62.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7Vinyas Innovative Technologies LtdVINYAS 60.0/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence BREAKING OUT 21.7/35 Revenue 65% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3 pp 48% evidence 19.0/25 ROCE 21.4% · OPM 13% 95% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 63.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.5/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench 31.3% · 1Y 24.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 19 + 10.8 + 8.5 = 60 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Data Patterns (India) LtdDATAPATTNS 58.3/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence LEADER 22.8/35 Revenue 33.9% · PAT 24.2% · OPM change -5 pp 100% evidence 19.8/25 ROCE 21.9% · OPM 27% 100% evidence 3.0/20 P/E 100× · PEG 3.94 100% evidence 12.7/20 RS sector 7.7% · RS bench 40.5% · 1Y 95%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.8 + 19.8 + 3 + 12.7 = 58.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
9Jaykay Enterprises LtdJAYKAY 54.3/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 29.0/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.8 pp 95% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE 8.2% · OPM 14.2% 95% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 61.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -20.9% · RS bench 1.6% · 1Y 13.3%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 29 + 8.1 + 11.1 + 6.1 = 54.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -20.9% and the one-year return is 13.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
10Astra Microwave Products LtdASTRAMICRO 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence LEADER 16.0/35 Revenue 3.9% · PAT 17.4% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence 17.7/25 ROCE 20.3% · OPM 19% 100% evidence 4.8/20 P/E 84.4× · PEG 3.3 100% evidence 15.0/20 RS sector 7.8% · RS bench 39.8% · 1Y 66.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16 + 17.7 + 4.8 + 15 = 53.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 39.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
11Hindustan Aeronautics LtdHAL 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence BREAKING OUT 13.9/35 Revenue 7.4% · PAT 12.2% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 20.4/25 ROCE 32% · OPM 28% 100% evidence 8.2/20 P/E 35.2× · PEG 3.54 100% evidence 9.8/20 RS sector -17.1% · RS bench 11.6% · 1Y 11.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.9 + 20.4 + 8.2 + 9.8 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Apollo Micro Systems LtdAPOLLO 51.8/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence FADING 19.6/35 Revenue 68.8% · PAT 74.2% · OPM change -10 pp 100% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 14.5% · OPM 21% 100% evidence 7.2/20 P/E 129× · PEG 1.6 100% evidence 11.6/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench 38.8% · 1Y 38.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 13.4 + 7.2 + 11.6 = 51.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Dynamatic Technologies LtdDYNAMATECH 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence83% evidence TURNING 18.3/35 Revenue 17.3% · PAT 0% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 10.2% · OPM 13% 100% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 140× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.7/20 RS sector -6.1% · RS bench 25% · 1Y 82.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 9.3 + 9.2 + 11.7 = 48.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Mishra Dhatu Nigam LtdMIDHANI 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence TURNING 16.6/35 Revenue 18.2% · PAT 13.4% · OPM change -5 pp 100% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 11.3% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 7.5/20 P/E 62.1× · PEG 5.62 100% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench 20.5% · 1Y 18.7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 11.5 + 7.5 + 9.9 = 45.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Bharat Electronics LtdBEL 45.0/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence TURNING 14.7/35 Revenue 19.8% · PAT 11.8% · OPM change -3 pp 100% evidence 19.3/25 ROCE 36.4% · OPM 25% 100% evidence 7.5/20 P/E 48.1× · PEG 3.54 100% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -27.8% · RS bench -2.2% · 1Y 9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.7 + 19.3 + 7.5 + 3.5 = 45 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Ideaforge Technology LtdIDEAFORGE 44.5/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 26.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 152.7 pp 74% evidence 1.3/25 ROCE -2.8% · OPM 3.4% 100% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 928× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.0/20 RS sector -3.5% · RS bench 24.1% · 1Y 44.1%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.7 + 1.3 + 8.5 + 8 = 44.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17High Energy Batteries (India) Ltd504176 43.3/100Mixed-negative evidence67% evidence TURNING 6.7/35 Revenue 1.5% · PAT -3.5% · OPM change -32.1 pp 95% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM -26.5% 76% evidence 12.3/20 P/E 38.9× · PEG — 50% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector — · RS bench 4.7% · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 6.7 + 14.2 + 12.3 + 10.1 = 43.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18Zen Technologies LtdZENTEC 41.4/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence FADING 5.1/35 Revenue -23.4% · PAT -27.8% · OPM change -14 pp 95% evidence 16.7/25 ROCE 16.2% · OPM 27% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 85.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.4/20 RS sector -6.6% · RS bench 13.1% · 1Y 16.5%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 5.1 + 16.7 + 10.2 + 9.4 = 41.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19BEML LtdBEML 40.5/100Mixed-negative evidence91% evidence BREAKING OUT 15.9/35 Revenue 12.8% · PAT -40.1% · OPM change 8.2 pp 74% evidence 3.5/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 0.2% 100% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 94.4× · PEG 1.18 100% evidence 10.4/20 RS sector -17% · RS bench 12% · 1Y -0.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 3.5 + 10.7 + 10.4 = 40.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20Bharat Dynamics LtdBDL 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence TURNING 12.1/35 Revenue -18.7% · PAT -7.1% · OPM change 33 pp 100% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 13.8% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 5.9/20 P/E 83.8× · PEG 4.44 65% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -35.7% · RS bench -12.4% · 1Y -17.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 13.3 + 5.9 + 3.9 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21AXISCADES Technologies LtdAXISCADES 33.1/100Adverse evidence93% evidence ASLEEP 11.9/35 Revenue 3.5% · PAT -55% · OPM change -2.3 pp 100% evidence 3.9/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 4.7% 100% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 238× · PEG 1.39 65% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -12% · RS bench 17% · 1Y 27.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.9 + 3.9 + 10.9 + 6.4 = 33.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
22Avantel LtdAVANTEL 32.1/100Adverse evidence83% evidence ASLEEP 9.9/35 Revenue -3.2% · PAT -67.2% · OPM change 4.6 pp 100% evidence 10.2/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM 24.8% 100% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 242× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.4/20 RS sector -26.5% · RS bench -1.1% · 1Y -11.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.9 + 10.2 + 8.6 + 3.4 = 32.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
23NIBE LtdNIBE 24.1/100Adverse evidence66% evidence FADING 3.0/35 Revenue -5.2% · PAT -80% · OPM change -24 pp 95% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM -15% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.7/20 RS sector -29.8% · RS bench 4.7% · 1Y 7.1%7 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 3 + 5.4 + 10 + 5.7 = 24.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24DCX Systems LtdDCXINDIA 24.0/100Adverse evidence71% evidence BASING 5.9/35 Revenue -46.5% · PAT -80% · OPM change -10.9 pp 95% evidence 4.2/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM -10.4% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -27.1% · RS bench -12.3% · 1Y -37.9%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 5.9 + 4.2 + 10 + 3.9 = 24 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25Aequs LtdAEQUS 39.1/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.3 pp 45% evidence 4.2/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 3.7% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 4.2 + 10 + 10 = 39.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Sigma Advanced System Ltd's share price today?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd trades at ₹832, +429.3% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹15,811 Cr. The stock sits at the very top of its 52-week range (₹145–₹832), +98.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 67 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.

What were Sigma Advanced System Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd reported revenue of ₹374 Cr and net profit of ₹35.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 7,380.0% and profit fell 74.3% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹1.36. The operating margin was 16.0%, 307.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Sigma Advanced System Ltd's revenue?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd reported revenue of ₹374 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +7,380.0% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹492 Cr. Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 22.8% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Sigma Advanced System Ltd's profit?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd earned ₹35.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −74.3% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹268 Cr. The operating margin ran 16.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Sigma Advanced System Ltd's market cap?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹15,811 Cr at a share price of ₹832. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Sigma Advanced System Ltd's P/E ratio?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd trades at a P/E of 95.1×, at the 79th percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 49.5×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Sigma Advanced System Ltd pay a dividend?

No — Sigma Advanced System Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Sigma Advanced System Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Sigma Advanced System Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 95.1× sits at the 79th percentile of its 10-year range (long-run median 49.5×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Sigma Advanced System Ltd growing?

Yes — Sigma Advanced System Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +7,380.0% year on year, profit −74.3%, and the margin +307.0 pp at 16.0%. The 10-year compound rates are 22.8% (revenue) and 74.9% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 11 September 2026.

How is Sigma Advanced System Ltd performing?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 67 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 7,380.0% and profit fell 74.3% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 28 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Sigma Advanced System Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 67 of stage 2), trading +98.2% versus its 200-day average and at the very top of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Sigma Advanced System Ltd beating the market?

On recent form, yes — Sigma Advanced System Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 28 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +14,277% against the NIFTY 500's +267% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.

Will Sigma Advanced System Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Sigma Advanced System Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹832, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 67 weeks in. Its P/E of 95.1× sits at the 79th percentile of its own 10-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.

Who owns Sigma Advanced System Ltd?

Promoters hold 66.2% of Sigma Advanced System Ltd, foreign institutions 0.1%, domestic institutions 0.0% and the public 33.6% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters added 31.2 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Sigma Advanced System Ltd have too much debt?

It is moderate — Sigma Advanced System Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.71, and operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. FY26 borrowings were ₹332 Cr against equity of ₹468 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Sigma Advanced System Ltd's capex?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd spent ₹176 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹148 Cr, with ₹9.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Sigma Advanced System Ltd's cash flow?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd consumed ₹225 Cr of operating cash in FY26 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: ₹−373 Cr). Operating cash was negative while the company reported a profit of ₹268 Cr. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Sigma Advanced System Ltd's profit real cash?

No — operating cash was negative over the last 3 fiscal years: Sigma Advanced System Ltd consumed cash while reporting profit. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−225 Cr against reported profit of ₹268 Cr. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.

Where is Sigma Advanced System Ltd in its business cycle?

Sigma Advanced System Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 10.0%, against a 12-year band of −898.0%–25.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 16.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.

What growth does Sigma Advanced System Ltd's price assume?

At its price on 13 June 2026, Sigma Advanced System Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 17.5% a year. Profit itself has compounded 74.9% a year over the past 10 years. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 11 September 2026.

What could break the Sigma Advanced System Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −69% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Sigma Advanced System Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Sigma Advanced System Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI