Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-11
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11

Ideaforge Technology Ltd

IDEAFORGE
Aerospace & Defence - Equipments

Ideaforge Technology Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 100th percentile of its own range says the market knows.

The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 100th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (19 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 100th percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 74% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the earnings grow into the multiple.

Price
₹734
+41.8% 1Y
P/E
928.0×
100th pctile
of its own 2-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹68.6 Cr
+436.7% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹−2.6 Cr
Operating margin
3.4%
+152.7 pp YoY
ROCE
−3%
FY26
ROIC
−3.7%
vs WACC 12.0% → −15.7 pp
Cash conversion
74%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Ideaforge Technology Ltd trades at ₹734, in a confirmed uptrend and 19 weeks into that stage. That is +6.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 60% of a 52-week range of ₹385 to ₹965. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (9 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 19 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹734 it trades +6.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 60% of its 52-week range (₹385–₹965).

Sep 26: ₹734 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+6.4% versus the 200-day line, week 19 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S4S4S2₹1,287₹1,031₹775₹519₹263₹734₹690Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Jan 26Sep 26
S4S4S2₹1,287₹1,031₹775₹519₹263₹734₹690Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2023 Each cell is one week from 2023 to now (173 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Jul 23Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 3.2 years the stock moved −43% while the NIFTY 500 moved +37% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (9 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-10) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Ideaforge Technology Ltd trades at 928.0× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 87.3×, measured across 1.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 928.0× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 87.3× measured over 1.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 928.0× vs a 87.3× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 1.5-year window; loss-period spikes above 219× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
about the priciest it has ever traded
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
232.6×₹15.5183.4×₹11.6134.2×₹7.785.0×₹3.935.8×₹0.0×184.20×₹3Jul 23Nov 23Apr 24Aug 24Jan 25
232.6×₹15.5183.4×₹11.6134.2×₹7.785.0×₹3.935.8×₹0.0×184.20×₹3Jul 23Apr 24Jan 25
P/E
928.0×
100th percentile of 2y
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Ideaforge Technology Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 10 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +40.4% in FY26 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
387%63%270%−18%153%−99%36%−179%−81%−260%%%40.4%−237.8%FY19FY22FY26
387%63%270%−18%153%−99%36%−179%−81%−260%%%40.4%−237.8%FY19FY22FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
244%214%160%76%75%−62%−9.7%−200%−94%−338%%%221.1%−300%−300%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
244%214%160%76%75%−62%−9.7%−200%−94%−338%%%221.1%−300%−300%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
13%11%7.8%5.0%2.2%%3%Sep 23Mar 24Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
13%11%7.8%5.0%2.2%%3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
Revenue growth
Rising
latest +221.1% · span −71.1% to +221.1%
ROCE
Falling
latest 3.0% · span 3.0%–12.7%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+40.4%+6.7%+45.2%
Share price+41.8%−10.2%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+436.7%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
43.5%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

44.5/100 — rank 16 of 25 in Aerospace & Defence - Equipments · 74% evidence confidence

Ideaforge Technology Ltd scores 44.5 out of 100 against the 25 companies it is compared with in Aerospace & Defence - Equipments, ranking 16. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 26.7 + 1.3 + 8.5 + 8 = 44.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Ideaforge Technology Ltd reported ₹68.6 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +436.7% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 7 years it has compounded at 43.5% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹226 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹282 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹226 Cr (+40.4% on the year), capping 7 years at 43.5% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹68.6 Cr, +436.7% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue ₹226 Cr (+40.4% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 8-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
43.5% a year over 7 years
RevenueYoY growth
339387%254270%170153%8536%0−81%₹ Cr%₹22640.4%FY19FY22FY26
339387%254270%170153%8536%0−81%₹ Cr%₹22640.4%FY19FY22FY26
Jun 26: ₹68.6 Cr (+436.7% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
4th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
1521,126%114801%76476%38150%0−175%₹ Cr%₹69436.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
1521,126%114801%76476%38150%0−175%₹ Cr%₹69436.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +280.1% growth against the decade's 43.5% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +221.1% over the last 4 quarters against −3.6%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Ideaforge Technology Ltd's operating margin is 3.4% in the Jun 26 quarter, +152.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −88.0% to 47.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 3.4%, +152.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −88.0%–47.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +152.7 pp year on year while gross margin went −12.7 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: 2.6% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 8-year window.
within a −88.0–47.0% band over 8 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
58%88%19%51%−21%14%−60%−23%−99%−60%%%2.6%34.6%FY19FY22FY26
58%88%19%51%−21%14%−60%−23%−99%−60%%%2.6%34.6%FY19FY22FY26
Jun 26: 3.4% operating margin (+152.7 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
59%259%3.2%149%−53%38%−109%−72%−165%−183%%%3.4%152.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
59%259%3.2%149%−53%38%−109%−72%−165%−183%%%3.4%152.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Ideaforge Technology Ltd posted a net loss of ₹2.6 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹17.0 Cr. That loss is 3.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹23.6 Cr. 7 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Jun 26 profit was ₹−2.6 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−17.0 Cr (null).

FY26 profit ₹−17.0 Cr (null YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 8-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
5463%23−18%−9−99%−40−179%−71−260%₹ Cr%₹−17−237.8%FY19FY22FY26
5463%23−18%−9−99%−40−179%−71−260%₹ Cr%₹−17−237.8%FY19FY22FY26
Jun 26: ₹−2.6 Cr (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
6785%40−505%13−1,096%−14−1,686%−41−2,277%₹ Cr%₹−3−2,113.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
6785%40−505%13−1,096%−14−1,686%−41−2,277%₹ Cr%₹−3−2,113.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 74% of Ideaforge Technology Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — most of the profit is real cash. In FY26 that was ₹−63.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−17.0 Cr of profit. After ₹94.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−157 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹−63.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−17.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−157 Cr after ₹94.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 74% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹−63.0 Cr vs profit ₹−17.0 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 8-year window, annual resolution.
74% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
9722−53−128−203₹ Cr₹−63₹−17₹−157FY19FY22FY26
9722−53−128−203₹ Cr₹−63₹−17₹−157FY19FY22FY26
FY26: CFO = 169% of profit (three-year rate 74%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
196%99%0.0%−96%−193%%169%FY19FY22FY26
196%99%0.0%−96%−193%%169%FY19FY22FY26

Why conversion sits at 74%: the cash cycle tightened 22 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 2.9× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Ideaforge Technology Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 587 days in FY26, down from 609 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹267 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹226 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.6 Cr, so roughly ₹363 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 204 days, inventory at 536 days — roughly 17.6 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 587 days, tighter than FY21's 609.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 536 days to sell; customers pay about 204 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 153 days — netting out to the 587-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹226 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.6 Cr — so the 587-day loop keeps roughly ₹363 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 587-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 8-year window.
−22 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
814603393182−29days587d536d204d153dFY19FY20FY22FY24FY26
814603393182−29days587d536d204d153dFY19FY22FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹267 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹93.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹110 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹94.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹110 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
1198959300₹ Cr₹94₹110FY20FY21FY23FY24FY26
1198959300₹ Cr₹94₹110FY20FY23FY26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Ideaforge Technology Ltd earns a ROCE of −3% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −17% in FY20. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −15.7 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −7.5% net margin on 0.28× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is −3%, recovered from a FY20 trough of −17% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −7.5% net margin × 0.28× asset turns × 1.33× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −2.8% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −3.7% − 12.0% = a −15.7 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE −3% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 7-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY20's −17%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
54%33%13%−7.1%−27%%−3%−7.5%FY20FY23FY26
54%33%13%−7.1%−27%%−3%−7.5%FY20FY23FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE −6.2% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
14%5.7%−3.1%−12%−21%%−6.2%−8.1%Q4 FY23Q2 FY25Q4 FY26
14%5.7%−3.1%−12%−21%%−6.2%−8.1%Q4 FY23Q2 FY25Q4 FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Ideaforge Technology Ltd carries total debt of ₹84.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹599 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.14 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.10 in FY22 to 0.14 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹84.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹599 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.14. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.10 (FY22) to 0.14 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY26: debt ₹84.0 Cr at 0.14× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
1090.33×820.25×550.17×270.08×00.00×₹ Cr×₹840.14×FY22FY24FY26
1090.33×820.25×550.17×270.08×00.00×₹ Cr×₹840.14×FY22FY24FY26
Mar 26: debt ₹84.0 Cr, debt-to-equity 0.14 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
1090.33×820.25×550.17×270.08×00.00×₹ Cr×₹840.14×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1090.33×820.25×550.17×270.08×00.00×₹ Cr×₹840.14×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Domestic institutions added 8.5 points of Ideaforge Technology Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 11.0% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +4.8 points over the same window, to 8.3%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: +8.5 points over 8 quarters to 11.0%; Foreign institutions: +4.8 points over 8 quarters to 8.3%; Promoters: −4.0 points over 8 quarters to 25.3%.

Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (+8.5 points), alongside foreign institutions (+4.8 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters −0.3 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
74%54%35%15%−4.7%%29.0%0.7%1.5%68.8%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
74%54%35%15%−4.7%%29.0%0.7%1.5%68.8%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Domestic institutions added 8.5 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
75%55%35%15%−5.3%%25.3%8.3%11.0%55.5%Sep 23Mar 25Jul 26
75%55%35%15%−5.3%%25.3%8.3%11.0%55.5%Sep 23Mar 25Jul 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Ideaforge Technology Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Aerospace & Defence - Equipments
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Sigma Advanced System LtdSIGMAADV 77.9/100Favorable setup82% evidence LEADER 28.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 20.3% · OPM change 307 pp 95% evidence 17.2/25 ROCE 60.8% · OPM 16% 76% evidence 12.5/20 P/E 95.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 19.8/20 RS sector 113.1% · RS bench 161.3% · 1Y 481.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 28.4 + 17.2 + 12.5 + 19.8 = 77.9 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Paras Defence and Space Technologies LtdPARAS 70.7/100Favorable setup82% evidence LEADER 25.8/35 Revenue 36.6% · PAT 54.8% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence 17.1/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 25% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 125× · PEG — 50% evidence 18.8/20 RS sector 29.1% · RS bench 66.5% · 1Y 117.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.8 + 17.1 + 9 + 18.8 = 70.7 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3MTAR Technologies LtdMTARTECH 67.2/100Favorable setup90% evidence TURNING 30.4/35 Revenue 53.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 6 pp 100% evidence 15.3/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 24% 100% evidence 8.0/20 P/E 165× · PEG — 50% evidence 13.5/20 RS sector 29.8% · RS bench 63% · 1Y 419.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 30.4 + 15.3 + 8 + 13.5 = 67.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Azad Engineering LtdAZAD 64.0/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence LEADER 24.2/35 Revenue 29% · PAT 41.4% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 37% 100% evidence 8.2/20 P/E 132× · PEG 2.29 65% evidence 18.8/20 RS sector 15.1% · RS bench 50.7% · 1Y 80.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.2 + 12.8 + 8.2 + 18.8 = 64 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Rossell Techsys LtdROSSTECH 62.9/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence BREAKING OUT 28.8/35 Revenue 82.9% · PAT 68.8% · OPM change 1.8 pp 100% evidence 8.0/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 14.4% 100% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 173× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.2/20 RS sector 13.1% · RS bench 48.2% · 1Y 69.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 28.8 + 8 + 8.9 + 17.2 = 62.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Sika Interplant Systems LtdSIKA 62.4/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.1/35 Revenue 0.5% · PAT 9.8% · OPM change 1.1 pp 100% evidence 21.9/25 ROCE 34.6% · OPM 19.5% 100% evidence 13.0/20 P/E 66.4× · PEG 1.01 100% evidence 8.4/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench 7.8% · 1Y -4.3%8 of 9 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.1 + 21.9 + 13 + 8.4 = 62.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7Vinyas Innovative Technologies LtdVINYAS 60.0/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence BREAKING OUT 21.7/35 Revenue 65% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3 pp 48% evidence 19.0/25 ROCE 21.4% · OPM 13% 95% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 63.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.5/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench 31.3% · 1Y 24.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 19 + 10.8 + 8.5 = 60 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Data Patterns (India) LtdDATAPATTNS 58.3/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence LEADER 22.8/35 Revenue 33.9% · PAT 24.2% · OPM change -5 pp 100% evidence 19.8/25 ROCE 21.9% · OPM 27% 100% evidence 3.0/20 P/E 100× · PEG 3.94 100% evidence 12.7/20 RS sector 7.7% · RS bench 40.5% · 1Y 95%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.8 + 19.8 + 3 + 12.7 = 58.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
9Jaykay Enterprises LtdJAYKAY 54.3/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 29.0/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.8 pp 95% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE 8.2% · OPM 14.2% 95% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 61.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -20.9% · RS bench 1.6% · 1Y 13.3%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 29 + 8.1 + 11.1 + 6.1 = 54.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -20.9% and the one-year return is 13.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
10Astra Microwave Products LtdASTRAMICRO 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence LEADER 16.0/35 Revenue 3.9% · PAT 17.4% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence 17.7/25 ROCE 20.3% · OPM 19% 100% evidence 4.8/20 P/E 84.4× · PEG 3.3 100% evidence 15.0/20 RS sector 7.8% · RS bench 39.8% · 1Y 66.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16 + 17.7 + 4.8 + 15 = 53.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 39.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
11Hindustan Aeronautics LtdHAL 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence BREAKING OUT 13.9/35 Revenue 7.4% · PAT 12.2% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 20.4/25 ROCE 32% · OPM 28% 100% evidence 8.2/20 P/E 35.2× · PEG 3.54 100% evidence 9.8/20 RS sector -17.1% · RS bench 11.6% · 1Y 11.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.9 + 20.4 + 8.2 + 9.8 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Apollo Micro Systems LtdAPOLLO 51.8/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence FADING 19.6/35 Revenue 68.8% · PAT 74.2% · OPM change -10 pp 100% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 14.5% · OPM 21% 100% evidence 7.2/20 P/E 129× · PEG 1.6 100% evidence 11.6/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench 38.8% · 1Y 38.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 13.4 + 7.2 + 11.6 = 51.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Dynamatic Technologies LtdDYNAMATECH 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence83% evidence TURNING 18.3/35 Revenue 17.3% · PAT 0% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 10.2% · OPM 13% 100% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 140× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.7/20 RS sector -6.1% · RS bench 25% · 1Y 82.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 9.3 + 9.2 + 11.7 = 48.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Mishra Dhatu Nigam LtdMIDHANI 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence TURNING 16.6/35 Revenue 18.2% · PAT 13.4% · OPM change -5 pp 100% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 11.3% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 7.5/20 P/E 62.1× · PEG 5.62 100% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench 20.5% · 1Y 18.7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 11.5 + 7.5 + 9.9 = 45.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Bharat Electronics LtdBEL 45.0/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence TURNING 14.7/35 Revenue 19.8% · PAT 11.8% · OPM change -3 pp 100% evidence 19.3/25 ROCE 36.4% · OPM 25% 100% evidence 7.5/20 P/E 48.1× · PEG 3.54 100% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -27.8% · RS bench -2.2% · 1Y 9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.7 + 19.3 + 7.5 + 3.5 = 45 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Ideaforge Technology Ltdthis pageIDEAFORGE 44.5/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 26.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 152.7 pp 74% evidence 1.3/25 ROCE -2.8% · OPM 3.4% 100% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 928× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.0/20 RS sector -3.5% · RS bench 24.1% · 1Y 44.1%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.7 + 1.3 + 8.5 + 8 = 44.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17High Energy Batteries (India) Ltd504176 43.3/100Mixed-negative evidence67% evidence TURNING 6.7/35 Revenue 1.5% · PAT -3.5% · OPM change -32.1 pp 95% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM -26.5% 76% evidence 12.3/20 P/E 38.9× · PEG — 50% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector — · RS bench 4.7% · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 6.7 + 14.2 + 12.3 + 10.1 = 43.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18Zen Technologies LtdZENTEC 41.4/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence FADING 5.1/35 Revenue -23.4% · PAT -27.8% · OPM change -14 pp 95% evidence 16.7/25 ROCE 16.2% · OPM 27% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 85.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.4/20 RS sector -6.6% · RS bench 13.1% · 1Y 16.5%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 5.1 + 16.7 + 10.2 + 9.4 = 41.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19BEML LtdBEML 40.5/100Mixed-negative evidence91% evidence BREAKING OUT 15.9/35 Revenue 12.8% · PAT -40.1% · OPM change 8.2 pp 74% evidence 3.5/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 0.2% 100% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 94.4× · PEG 1.18 100% evidence 10.4/20 RS sector -17% · RS bench 12% · 1Y -0.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 3.5 + 10.7 + 10.4 = 40.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20Bharat Dynamics LtdBDL 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence TURNING 12.1/35 Revenue -18.7% · PAT -7.1% · OPM change 33 pp 100% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 13.8% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 5.9/20 P/E 83.8× · PEG 4.44 65% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -35.7% · RS bench -12.4% · 1Y -17.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 13.3 + 5.9 + 3.9 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21AXISCADES Technologies LtdAXISCADES 33.1/100Adverse evidence93% evidence ASLEEP 11.9/35 Revenue 3.5% · PAT -55% · OPM change -2.3 pp 100% evidence 3.9/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 4.7% 100% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 238× · PEG 1.39 65% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -12% · RS bench 17% · 1Y 27.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.9 + 3.9 + 10.9 + 6.4 = 33.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
22Avantel LtdAVANTEL 32.1/100Adverse evidence83% evidence ASLEEP 9.9/35 Revenue -3.2% · PAT -67.2% · OPM change 4.6 pp 100% evidence 10.2/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM 24.8% 100% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 242× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.4/20 RS sector -26.5% · RS bench -1.1% · 1Y -11.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.9 + 10.2 + 8.6 + 3.4 = 32.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
23NIBE LtdNIBE 24.1/100Adverse evidence66% evidence FADING 3.0/35 Revenue -5.2% · PAT -80% · OPM change -24 pp 95% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM -15% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.7/20 RS sector -29.8% · RS bench 4.7% · 1Y 7.1%7 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 3 + 5.4 + 10 + 5.7 = 24.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24DCX Systems LtdDCXINDIA 24.0/100Adverse evidence71% evidence BASING 5.9/35 Revenue -46.5% · PAT -80% · OPM change -10.9 pp 95% evidence 4.2/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM -10.4% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -27.1% · RS bench -12.3% · 1Y -37.9%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 5.9 + 4.2 + 10 + 3.9 = 24 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25Aequs LtdAEQUS 39.1/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.3 pp 45% evidence 4.2/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 3.7% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 4.2 + 10 + 10 = 39.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Ideaforge Technology Ltd's share price today?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd trades at ₹734, +41.8% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹3,648 Cr. The stock sits at 60% of its 52-week range of ₹385–₹965, +6.4% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 19 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.

What were Ideaforge Technology Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd reported revenue of ₹68.6 Cr and a net loss of ₹2.6 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−0.60. The operating margin was 3.4%, 152.7 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Ideaforge Technology Ltd's revenue?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd reported revenue of ₹68.6 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +436.7% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹226 Cr (+40.4%). Over the last 7 years revenue compounded at 43.5% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Ideaforge Technology Ltd's profit?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd earned ₹−2.6 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−17.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 3.4% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Ideaforge Technology Ltd's market cap?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹3,648 Cr at a share price of ₹734. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Ideaforge Technology Ltd's P/E ratio?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd trades at a P/E of 928.0×, at the most expensive it has been in 2 years, against a long-run median of 87.3×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Ideaforge Technology Ltd pay a dividend?

No — Ideaforge Technology Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 8 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Ideaforge Technology Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Ideaforge Technology Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 928.0× sits at the most expensive it has been in 2 years (long-run median 87.3×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.

How is Ideaforge Technology Ltd performing?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 19 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 9 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Ideaforge Technology Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 19 of stage 2), trading +6.4% versus its 200-day average and at 60% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Ideaforge Technology Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Ideaforge Technology Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (9 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-10), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 3.2 years the stock moved −43% against the NIFTY 500's +37% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.

Will Ideaforge Technology Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Ideaforge Technology Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹734, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 19 weeks in. Its P/E of 928.0× sits at the 100th percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.

Who owns Ideaforge Technology Ltd?

Promoters hold 25.3% of Ideaforge Technology Ltd, foreign institutions 8.3%, domestic institutions 11.0% and the public 55.5% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions added 8.5 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Ideaforge Technology Ltd have too much debt?

No — Ideaforge Technology Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.14, and operating profit covers the interest bill 1×. FY26 borrowings were ₹84.0 Cr against equity of ₹599 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Ideaforge Technology Ltd's capex?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd spent ₹267 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹94.0 Cr, with ₹110 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Ideaforge Technology Ltd's cash flow?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd consumed ₹63.0 Cr of operating cash in FY26 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: ₹−157 Cr). Reported profit that year was ₹−17.0 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Ideaforge Technology Ltd's profit real cash?

Mostly — over the last 3 fiscal years, 74% of Ideaforge Technology Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−63.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−17.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.

Where is Ideaforge Technology Ltd in its business cycle?

Ideaforge Technology Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 2.6%, against a 8-year band of −88.0%–47.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 3.4%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.

What could break the Ideaforge Technology Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 100th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Ideaforge Technology Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Ideaforge Technology Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 100th percentile of its own range says the market knows. The sharpest open question: whether the earnings grow into the multiple. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI