Rossell Techsys share price today

Rossell Techsys Ltd's share price was ₹1,383.40 at the close on 6 November 2026. It has been rising for 67 weeks. That is 29.8% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹574 and ₹1,575, and at that close it sat 81% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Rossell Techsys Ltd is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 14 weeks in a row.

Over the last 1 year the share price moved +157% while the NIFTY 500 moved −5%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

9 points in one quarter, revenue up on a year earlier for 7 quarters in a row and profit up on a year earlier for 7 quarters in a row.

1. Promoters cut their stake by 4.9 points in one quarter

   From 74.8% to 69.9% in the September 2026 quarter.

2. Revenue up on a year earlier for 7 quarters in a row

   In the June 2026 quarter revenue was ₹154 crore, +77.1% on a year earlier.

3. Profit up on a year earlier for 7 quarters in a row

   In the June 2026 quarter profit was ₹7 crore, +116.4% on a year earlier.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), Rossell Techsys reported revenue of ₹154 crore, up 77.1% from ₹87.2 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹7.14 crore, up 116.4% from ₹3.30 crore.

Rossell Techsys results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

The newest call in our records is from 12 May 2026, about January to March 2026; a call about these results is not in our records yet.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Rossell Techsys closed at ₹1,383.40 on 6 November 2026, up 104.3% from ₹677.20 a year earlier (7 November 2025). Its highest weekly close since December 2024 was ₹1,574.80 on 9 October 2026.

Rossell Techsys share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 6 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

107 weekly closes from 13 December 2024 to 6 November 2026.

6 Nov 2026: Rossell Techsys closed at ₹1,383.40, up 1.7% on the week and down 12.2% on the month. 17 Sep 2026: ex-date for a dividend of ₹0.30 a share.

Earlier

• Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 77.1% and profit up 116.4% on a year earlier.
• Our read, 17 May 2026: A qualification-to-production scaling story, 87% FY26 revenue growth with margin temporarily compressed; the inflection to 17-22% operating profit is the trade.
• 12 May 2026: Rossell Techsys held its results call for January to March 2026. Management guided: FY27 revenue growth aiming for 80-90% similar to FY26 87%.

Our read of the business

Latest quarter: Strongest quarter in history, ₹142 crore revenue, ₹400 crore space contract won.

Our read after the latest results, written 17 May 2026.

Rossell Techsys paid ₹0.30 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 7 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 0.02% at the ₹1,383.40 close on 6 November 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹0.30 a share, ex-date 17 September 2026.

Rossell Techsys dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Yes. Rossell Techsys Ltd paid out 5% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 2 of its last 4 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 7 November 2026.

On the call for January to March 2026, held on 12 May 2026, Rossell Techsys' management guided: FY27 revenue growth aiming for 80-90% similar to FY26 87%.

“Once this door opens at scale, it could significantly reshape our growth outlook, business model, and long-term projections”Rishab Mohan Gupta, on commercial aviation entry, on the call for January to March 2026

What management guided

• FY27 operating margin improving to 17-22% range from FY26 13.6%.
• Semiconductor and space FY27 growth aiming for 300-400% vs blended company 80-90%.
• Semiconductor revenue potential $200 million within 3-5 years from current baseline.
• Boeing loss-making program ₹75 crore executed FY26, ₹70 crore remaining FY27 front-loaded in first half.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for January to March 2026, 12 May 2026. The April to June 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

What is changing at Rossell Techsys, from the latest results and calls: order book / contract wins, ₹750 crore pos + ₹3,000 crore strategic agreements, fai-to-production margin inflection, 13.6% → 17-22% operating profit goal and semiconductor segment, from single customer to $200m potential.

• Order Book / Contract Wins, ₹750 crore POs + ₹3,000 crore Strategic Agreements. ₹750 crore confirmed POs (2-3 year execution) backed by ₹3,000 crore strategic agreements providing 6x+ revenue visibility; ₹4,500 crore bids pending. ⚠ estimate
• FAI-to-Production Margin Inflection, 13.6% → 17-22% operating profit Goal. Every new qualification program transitions from high-cost FAI phase to lean production, operating profit should structurally step from 13.6% toward 17-22% as qualifications complete in FY27. ⚠ estimate
• Semiconductor Segment, From Single Customer to $200M Potential. Semiconductor went from ₹0 to ₹20%+ of FY26 revenue; one customer shifted from South Korean supply base; second major customer in active onboarding; $200M in 3-5 years. ⚠ estimate
• Space Segment, Qualification Phase Complete, Volume Ramp FY27. Landmark ₹400 crore multi-year space contract won; first large production batches completed; volume ramp expected late FY27 (Q3-Q4); additional space customers onboarding. ⚠ estimate

We check 16 kinds of change in every company, such as costs spread over more sales, higher-value products, new orders, new regions or falling debt, against its reported numbers and what management said on its calls. Only changes the numbers back are shown.

Our read after the latest results, written 17 May 2026.

Order book ₹750 crore confirmed POs + ₹3,000 crore strategic agreements + ₹4,500 crore bids pending.

• Order book ₹750 crore confirmed POs as of January to March 2026; strategic agreements ₹3,000 crore (upgraded from ₹2,500 crore mentioned in prior calls) ✓ fact

Our read after the latest results, written 17 May 2026.

80% US revenue with Boeing ~40% concentration; tariff exemptions protect currently but program delays or budget shifts create direct revenue exposure.

The main risks

• US concentration, 80% revenue; Boeing/Lockheed program dependency: 80% US revenue with Boeing ~40% concentration; tariff exemptions protect currently but program delays or budget shifts create direct revenue exposure. ✓ fact
• QIP dilution overhang, timing uncertain, sizing methodology changed: QIP originally ₹300 crore fixed (Nov 2025) → now 7-10% of market cap (May 2026) = variable ₹234-334 Cr at current MCap, overhang persists 5+ months post deadline. ✓ fact
• Space/semiconductor volume ramp back-loaded in FY27, execution risk: 300-400% segment growth assumes late-FY27 (Q3-Q4) space ramp AND second semiconductor customer onboarding, H1 FY27 could disappoint on mix expectations. ✓ fact
• Inventory at 7.67 months, working capital intensity at peak capital spending phase: Inventory coverage at 7.67 months (improved from 10 months) with goal 4 months, at ₹300+ Cr working capital tied up during high capital spending and QIP uncertainty phase. ✓ fact

Our read after the latest results, written 17 May 2026.

When Rossell Techsys reports July to September 2026, these are the 4 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Space program volume ramp-up timed for late FY27 (Q3-Q4 expected) - falsifiable against actual execution and 300-400% growth goal achievement.

Rossell Techsys is on 2 of our India lists: Momentum stocks and Defence stocks.

Rossell Techsys Ltd earned ₹7.1 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +116.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 3rd quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹22.0 Cr. That is 4.6% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹3.3 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹22.0 Cr (+175.0% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +77.1% on a year earlier and the margin moved +1.8 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +43.4% and revenue +89.2%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Rossell Techsys Ltd reported ₹154 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +77.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 7th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹485 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹552 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Why this happened. The order pipeline provides structural forward revenue certainty. Confirmed POs at Rs 750 Cr represent approximately 1.5 years of current revenue (FY26: Rs 485 Cr), while the Rs 3,000 Cr strategic agreements map 3-5 year program visibility. The Rs 4,500 Cr bid pipeline represents 9x current revenue and provides acceleration optionality. Fortune 500 aerospace customers (Boeing, Lockheed Martin) provide repeat, level-loaded schedules. This is not single-contract concentration, 30+ customers across aerospace/defence, semiconductor, and space.

A growth rate over several years is not shown, because there are too few years of figures to work one out properly.

FY26 revenue was ₹485 Cr, +86.5% on the year before.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +82.9%, against +58.7% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +68.8%, against +96.9% a year (rolling over).

Rossell Techsys Ltd's operating margin was 14.4% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 1.8 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 years it has been between 13.0% and 15.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +1.8 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −2.6 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years Rossell Techsys Ltd's operations used more cash than they brought in, so cash conversion was −300%, a gap worth watching. In FY26 its operations used ₹83.0 Cr of cash, against ₹22.0 Cr of profit. After ₹23.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹106 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why −300% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 121 days shorter between FY24 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: no single use of cash stands out. The next section checks both the cash tied up in daily operations and the spending on assets.

Rossell Techsys Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 412 days in FY26, down from 533 days in FY24. It spent ₹48.0 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 88 days to pay, and stock sits for 380 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹485 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹1.3 Cr, so roughly ₹547 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 88 days to pay and stock sat for 380 days, about 12.5 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 412 days, shorter than FY24's 533.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 380 days. Customers pay about 88 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 55 days. Together that makes the 412-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹48.0 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹33.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building a little beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹2.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: neither the daily cycle nor new spending is soaking up the cash, so the picture is fairly clean.

Rossell Techsys Ltd's P/E is 197.5×, near the high end of its own history: higher than 96% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 121.6×, over 1 year of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

The P/E here, and its history, use a profit figure that can leave out one-off items, so it can differ from a P/E worked out on the quarterly results. Those results' earnings per share for the four quarters to Jun 2026 add up to ₹6.82.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +176.7% while the price moved +104.3%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

In short: the multiple is high against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Rossell Techsys Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 9 quarters of 2 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Rossell Techsys Ltd's story is not scored yet against the checks our research set on 17 May 2026. Where it sits in its own cycle: EXPANDING MID STAGE.

NOT YET CHECKED

Our read, 17 May 2026. A qualification-to-production scaling story, 87% FY26 revenue growth with margin temporarily compressed; the inflection to 17-22% EBITDA is the trade.

From the numbers. DII stake-building (FII at 1.5%, DII at 2.77% and…

From the price. Price stage 2, week 67, above its 200-day line, relative strength rising.

From the research. A qualification-to-production scaling story, 87% FY26 revenue growth with margin temporarily compressed; the inflection to 17-22% EBITDA is the trade.

Where they disagree. DII stake-building (FII at 1.5%, DII at 2.77% and building). Promoter at 74.80% stable.

What is proven. A qualification-to-production scaling story, 87% FY26 revenue growth with margin temporarily compressed; the inflection to 17-22% EBITDA is the trade.

The test written in advance. Management consistency failures, 3 documented across 4 calls. Measured by: Management consistency failures, 3 documented across 4 calls Q2 FY27 concall, does QIP close? Does EBITDA land ≥17%? by the next result.

The test written in advance. US concentration, 80% revenue; Boeing/Lockheed program dependency. Measured by: US concentration, 80% revenue; Boeing/Lockheed program dependency Boeing revenue concentration Q-o-Q; India domestic order wins by the next result.

What the company does. FY26 closed with revenue Rs 485 Cr (+87% YoY), PBT Rs 28 Cr (+180% YoY); order book Rs 750 Cr confirmed POs + Rs 3,000 Cr strategic agreements provide 3+ year visibility. Three new growth vectors (semiconductor, space, commercial aviation MRO) collectively aiming for 300-400% FY27 growth alongside 80-90% blended revenue growth;

The key numbers to watch, and the level that would change the picture

Everything further down this page is evidence for or against these.

• 1 · Operating leveragequiet
• 2 · Value-added mixquiet
• 3 · Management changequiet
• 4 · Paying down debtbuilding
• 5 · Regulatory approvalquiet
• 6 · Order-book winsbuilding
• 7 · Consolidationbuilding
• 8 · Demerger or value unlockquiet
• 9 · Buybackquiet
• 10 · New geographiesbuilding
• 11 · More business from existing customersbuilding
• 12 · New product launchquiet
• 13 · Mandatory normsquiet
• 14 · A bigger market to servequiet
• 15 · Market-share gainsquiet
• 16 · Asset qualityquiet

Lever 6 · Order-book wins: building. Rs 750 Cr confirmed POs (2-3 year execution) backed by Rs 3,000 Cr strategic agreements providing 6x+ revenue visibility; Rs 4,500 Cr bids pending. What proves it keeps working: Order Book / Contract Wins, Rs 750 Cr POs + Rs 3,000 Cr Strategic Agreements. It stops working if Q1 FY27 EBITDA margin vs 17% floor.

Lever 4 · Paying down debt: building. Every new qualification program transitions from high-cost FAI phase to lean production, EBITDA should structurally step from 13.6% toward 17-22% as qualifications complete in FY27. What proves it keeps working: FAI-to-Production Margin Inflection, 13.6% → 17-22% EBITDA Goal. It stops working if Q1 FY27 EBITDA margin vs 17% floor.

Lever 7 · Consolidation: building. Semiconductor went from Rs 0 to Rs 20%+ of FY26 revenue; one customer shifted from South Korean supply base; second major customer in active onboarding; $200M in 3-5 years. What proves it keeps working: Semiconductor Segment, From Single Customer to $200M Potential. It stops working if Q1 FY27 EBITDA margin vs 17% floor.

Lever 10 · New geographies: building. Shortlisted as preferred supplier by multinational commercial aviation players; RFPs expected Q2 FY27; management calls years 2-5 revenue 'exponentially larger' than defence + space + semiconductor combined. What proves it keeps working: Commercial Aviation Launch, Transformational Optionality. It stops working if Q1 FY27 EBITDA margin vs 17% floor.

Sources: our stock research file (17 May 2026) · quarterly results through Jun 2026 · the company’s own earnings calls. The story check is re-scored every results season; the record below never changes.

The whole page in one table. Each row links to its section.

What Rossell Techsys Ltd's management promised, against what actually happened: 4 promises on the record. Read straight from the company’s own earnings calls. A promise that slipped stays on this page after it is met.

QIP Deadline Missed and Sizing Basis Changed · 12 May 2026. In the Nov 2025 call, management committed to closing the QIP by end of December 2025, stating a fixed INR300 crore goal. By the Feb 2026 call, the December deadline had passed with no revised timeline provided, though the INR300 crore figure was reaffirmed.

FY26 Non-Defense Segment Mix Significantly Below Q3-Guided Level · 12 May 2026. In the Feb 2026 call with just one quarter remaining in FY26, both the Managing Director and CEO explicitly confirmed the FY26 revenue split at approximately 70% aerospace/defense and 30% non-aerospace/defense, with the CEO validating this estimate directly on the call. The May 2026 call reporting FY26 actuals disclosed that space and semiconductor - the primary constituents of the non-defense category given MRO and commercial aviation had not yet started - contributed only approximately 20% of FY26 revenue, a 10 percentage point shortfall against guidance given with dual executive confirmation and minimal time remaining in the year.

EBITDA Margin Floor Silently Raised and Misrepresented as Consistent History · 12 May 2026. In the Nov 2025 call, management framed the EBITDA margin goal as 15% to 20%, explicitly invoking the phrase 'I've always said' to present this as a consistent long-standing position. In the May 2026 call, management again invokes 'I've always said' but this time cites a 17% to 22% range, raising the stated floor by 200 basis points while claiming unchanged guidance history. Using identical anchoring language to assert two different ranges in two documentable calls is a direct credibility inconsistency that analysts tracking management narrative reliability would be right to question.

QIP Fundraising Timeline Miss · 4 February 2026. In the November 2025 call, management explicitly stated the intent to close the INR300 crore QIP within 45 days (by end of December 2025). In the February 2026 call, the QIP is still described as merely "underway" with vague timing dependent on market sentiment, confirming a missed deadline without a specific new date. Earlier call (Nov 2025): “So another, I would say 45 days, the QIP should be closed. So that”. Later call (Feb 2026): “The process is underway. We are in dialogue with investors. It is a matter of timing and market sentiment. It will be done sooner rather than later.”

Every quote above is taken word for word from the company’s own earnings calls.

Revenue ramp is real and accelerating. Profit misses are technical/exceptional, auditor confirms. No evidence of guidance exaggeration or analyst expectation management failures. The absence of explicit forward guidance is a yellow flag but common in defence/aerospace companies dealing with classified order books.

Regulatory and governance record

No SEBI fraud, no promoter scam, no regulatory penalty found. Note: 'Rosstech Electric Equipment' in brief is incorrect, ROSSTECH = Rossell Techsys (aerospace/defence, not electric equipment). Auditor: Raghavan, Chauduri and Narayanan. No pledging or fraud signals in any search. July to September 2025 profit: -5,770% on a year earlier, alarming headline but driven by exceptional items from demerger transition, not operating deterioration. October to December 2025: revenue +71% on a year earlier but profit -64% due to ₹1.02 crore exceptional charge (Labour Code retrospective liability). One-off charges are disclosed transparently.

Checked 12 April 2026.

Rossell Techsys Ltd earned a ROCE of 12% in FY26. That is up from a low of 9% in FY24. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 3.3 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses.

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

It comes from a 4.5% net margin and 0.77× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 4.5% net margin × 0.77× asset turnover × 4.07× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 14.1% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 8.7% − 12.0% = −3.3 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

Rossell Techsys Ltd has total debt of ₹409 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹155 Cr as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 2.64× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 1.32 in FY24 to 2.64 in FY26. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Why this happened. The margin compression narrative is critical to understanding the thesis. FY26 EBITDA declined to 13.6% (from 14.6% FY25) despite 87% revenue growth because management deliberately spent on 1,200-person headcount expansion, customer FAI qualification costs, training, and setup for semiconductor and space programs. These are one-time certification costs that do not immediately generate revenue but gate future volume production. As each program transitions from FAI to production phase, unit costs normalise and margins expand. Management goals 17-22% EBITDA in FY27, implying 350-850bps expansion. The automation underway in semiconductor should maintain margins inline with…

Promoters cut their stake in Rossell Techsys Ltd by 4.9 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Promoters now own 69.9% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +2.3 points over the same period, to 5.0%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Promoters: −4.9 points over 8 quarters, to 69.9%; Domestic institutions: +2.3 points over 8 quarters, to 5.0%; Foreign institutions: +0.3 points over 8 quarters, to 1.8%.

Why the owners changed: promoters drove it (−4.9 points), with the other side taken by domestic institutions (+2.3 points). They reduced their stake.

For Rossell Techsys Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

64.0 out of 100, rank 4 of 25 in Aerospace & Defence - Equipments, with 79% of the evidence available.

Rossell Techsys Ltd scores 64.0 out of 100 against the 25 companies it is compared with in Aerospace & Defence - Equipments, ranking 4. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 27.7 + 8 + 8.8 + 19.5 = 64. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Rossell Techsys ranks 4 of 25 Aerospace & Defence - Equipments companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 64.0 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Aerospace & Defence - Equipments, all 25 compared on one page.

Rossell Techsys is the 17th largest of 25 Aerospace & Defence - Equipments companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Dynamatic Technologies, AXISCADES Technologies and Mishra Dhatu Nigam. Just below it: Avantel, Ideaforge Technology and Jaykay Enterprises.

Aerospace & Defence - Equipments companies close in size

14. Dynamatic Technologies Ltd ₹8,776 crore
15. AXISCADES Technologies Ltd ₹8,075 crore
16. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd ₹6,758 crore
17. Rossell Techsys Ltd ₹5,365 crore
18. Avantel Ltd ₹3,583 crore
19. Ideaforge Technology Ltd ₹3,125 crore
20. Jaykay Enterprises Ltd ₹2,947 crore

All 25 Aerospace & Defence - Equipments companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

815. V2 Retail Ltd ₹5,377 crore · Textiles - Readymade Apparel
816. Balu Forge Industries Ltd ₹5,371 crore · Castings, Forgings & Fastners
817. Rossell Techsys Ltd ₹5,365 crore
818. Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd ₹5,351 crore · Sugar
819. Goodluck India Ltd ₹5,316 crore · Steel - Tubes/Pipes

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 6 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.