Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

Rossell Techsys Ltd

ROSSTECH
Aerospace & Defence - Equipments

Rossell Techsys Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +176.7% in a year against a +63.5% price move.

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −302% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (54 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 68th percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +116.4% year on year, and −302% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.

Price
₹954
+63.5% 1Y
P/E
136.0×
68th pctile
of its own 2-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹154 Cr
+77.1% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹7.1 Cr
+116.4% YoY
Operating margin
14.4%
+1.8 pp YoY
ROCE
12%
FY26
ROIC
8.7%
vs WACC 12.0% → −3.3 pp
Cash conversion
−302%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Rossell Techsys Ltd trades at ₹954, in a confirmed uptrend and 54 weeks into that stage. That is +16.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 79% of a 52-week range of ₹574 to ₹1,057. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (3 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 54 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹954 it trades +16.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 79% of its 52-week range (₹574–₹1,057).

Jul 26: ₹954 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 2-year window.
+16.2% versus the 200-day line, week 54 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S4S2₹1,121₹888₹655₹422₹189₹954₹821Dec 24May 25Oct 25Apr 26Jul 26
S4S2₹1,121₹888₹655₹422₹189₹954₹821Dec 24Oct 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2024 Each cell is one week from 2024 to now (92 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Dec 24Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.6 years the stock moved +77% while the NIFTY 500 moved +2% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-10) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Rossell Techsys Ltd trades at 136.0× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (68th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 114.2×, measured across 1.6 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 136.0× is mid-range by its own standards (68th percentile), against a long-run median of 114.2× measured over 1.6 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 136.0× vs a 114.2× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 1.6-year window; loss-period spikes above 184× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
mid-range by its own standards (68th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
198.9×₹3,061149.2×₹2,29699.5×₹1,53049.7×₹7650.0×₹0.0×135.90×₹7Dec 24Mar 25Sep 25Dec 25Jul 26
198.9×₹3,061149.2×₹2,29699.5×₹1,53049.7×₹7650.0×₹0.0×135.90×₹7Dec 24Sep 25Jul 26
P/E
136.0×
68th percentile of 2y
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +176.7% against a +63.5% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Rossell Techsys Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 8 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +86.5% in FY26, profit +175.0% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
92%199%72%119%53%38%34%−42%14%−122%%%86.5%175%FY23FY24FY26
92%199%72%119%53%38%34%−42%14%−122%%%86.5%175%FY23FY24FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating, profit rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
159%332%113%216%66%99%19%−17%−28%−134%%%77.1%116.4%68.4%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
159%332%113%216%66%99%19%−17%−28%−134%%%77.1%116.4%68.4%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
38%30%23%15%7.7%%34.8%Sep 23Mar 24Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
38%30%23%15%7.7%%34.8%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
Revenue growth
Rolling over
latest +77.1% · span −14.9% to +94.3%
ROCE
Rising
latest 34.8% · span 9.8%–35.8%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+86.5%
Profit+175.0%
EPS+176.7%
Share price+63.5%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+77.1%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
+116.4%
latest quarter vs a year ago
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

54.1/100 — rank 12 of 24 in Aerospace & Defence - Equipments · 83% evidence confidence

Rossell Techsys Ltd scores 54.1 out of 100 against the 24 companies it is compared with in Aerospace & Defence - Equipments, ranking 12. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 29 + 7.4 + 9 + 8.7 = 54.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Rossell Techsys Ltd reported ₹154 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +77.1% year on year. That is the 7th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹485 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹552 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹485 Cr (+86.5% on the year). The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹154 Cr, +77.1% year on year — the 7th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue ₹485 Cr (+86.5% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 4-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
RevenueYoY growth
52492%39372%26253%13134%014%₹ Cr%₹48586.5%FY23FY24FY26
52492%39372%26253%13134%014%₹ Cr%₹48586.5%FY23FY24FY26
Jun 26: ₹154 Cr (+77.1% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
7th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
167159%125113%8366%4219%0−28%₹ Cr%₹15477.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
167159%125113%8366%4219%0−28%₹ Cr%₹15477.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +82.9% over the last 4 quarters against +58.7%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +68.8% vs +96.9%/yr — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Rossell Techsys Ltd's operating margin is 14.4% in the Jun 26 quarter, +1.8 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 13.0% to 15.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 14.4%, +1.8 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 13.0%–15.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.8 pp year on year while gross margin went −2.6 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY26: 13.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 3-year window.
within a 13.0–15.0% band over 3 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
15.2%0.2%14.6%−0.4%14.0%−1.0%13.4%−1.6%12.8%−2.2%%%13%−1%FY24FY25FY26
15.2%0.2%14.6%−0.4%14.0%−1.0%13.4%−1.6%12.8%−2.2%%%13%−1%FY24FY25FY26
Jun 26: 14.4% operating margin (+1.8 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
21%17%15%10%8.5%3.5%2.2%−3.2%−4.1%−9.8%%%14.4%1.8%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
21%17%15%10%8.5%3.5%2.2%−3.2%−4.1%−9.8%%%14.4%1.8%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Rossell Techsys Ltd earned ₹7.1 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +116.4% year on year. It is the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹22.0 Cr. That is 4.6% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹3.3 Cr. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Jun 26 profit was ₹7.1 Cr, +116.4% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹22.0 Cr (+175.0%).

FY26 profit ₹22.0 Cr (+175.0% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 4-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
24191%18133%1274%615%0−43%₹ Cr%₹22175%FY23FY24FY26
24191%18133%1274%615%0−43%₹ Cr%₹22175%FY23FY24FY26
Jun 26: ₹7.1 Cr (+116.4% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
3rd straight quarter of growth
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
8400%5265%2131%−20.0%−5−139%₹ Cr%₹7116.4%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
8400%5265%2131%−20.0%−5−139%₹ Cr%₹7116.4%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +77.1% and the margin +1.8 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +43.4% vs revenue +89.2%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years −302% of Rossell Techsys Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹−83.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹22.0 Cr of profit. After ₹23.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−106 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹−83.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹22.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−106 Cr after ₹23.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −302% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹−83.0 Cr vs profit ₹22.0 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 4-year window, annual resolution.
−302% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
32−5−42−79−116₹ Cr₹−83₹22₹−106FY23FY24FY26
32−5−42−79−116₹ Cr₹−83₹22₹−106FY23FY24FY26
FY26: CFO = −377% of profit (three-year rate −302%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
150%−31%−213%−394%−575%%−377%FY23FY24FY26
150%−31%−213%−394%−575%%−377%FY23FY24FY26

🚨 Why conversion sits at −302%: the cash cycle tightened 121 days between FY24 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Rossell Techsys Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 412 days in FY26, down from 533 days in FY24. Capital spending ran ₹48.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹485 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.3 Cr, so roughly ₹547 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 88 days, inventory at 380 days — roughly 12.5 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 412 days, tighter than FY24's 533.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 380 days to sell; customers pay about 88 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 55 days — netting out to the 412-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹485 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.3 Cr — so the 412-day loop keeps roughly ₹547 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 412-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 3-year window.
−121 days vs FY24
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
65149133117111days412d380d88d55dFY24FY25FY26
65149133117111days412d380d88d55dFY24FY25FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹48.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹33.0 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹2.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹23.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹2.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
steady investment
CapexWork-in-progress
25191260₹ Cr₹23₹2FY24FY25FY26
25191260₹ Cr₹23₹2FY24FY25FY26

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Rossell Techsys Ltd earns a ROCE of 12% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 8% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −3.3 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 4.5% net margin on 0.77× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 12%, recovered from a FY25 trough of 8% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 4.5% net margin × 0.77× asset turns × 4.07× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 14.1% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 8.7% − 12.0% = a −3.3 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE 12% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 3-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY25's 8%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
13%11%8.6%6.6%4.7%%12%8.4%FY24FY25FY26
13%11%8.6%6.6%4.7%%12%8.4%FY24FY25FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE 29.0% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 8 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
32%25%18%11%4.0%%29%8.9%Q4 FY24Q4 FY25Q4 FY26
32%25%18%11%4.0%%29%8.9%Q4 FY24Q4 FY25Q4 FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Rossell Techsys Ltd carries total debt of ₹409 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹155 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 2.64. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.32 in FY24 to 2.64 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹409 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹155 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 2.64. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.32 (FY24) to 2.64 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY26: debt ₹409 Cr at 2.64× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 3-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
4422.7×3312.4×2212.0×1101.6×01.2×₹ Cr×₹4092.64×FY24FY25FY26
4422.7×3312.4×2212.0×1101.6×01.2×₹ Cr×₹4092.64×FY24FY25FY26
Mar 26: debt ₹409 Cr, debt-to-equity 2.64 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 7 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
4422.7×3312.4×2212.0×1101.6×01.2×₹ Cr×₹4092.64×Mar 24Jun 25Mar 26
4422.7×3312.4×2212.0×1101.6×01.2×₹ Cr×₹4092.64×Mar 24Jun 25Mar 26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Domestic institutions cut 1.9 points of Rossell Techsys Ltd over 7 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 0.8% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +0.2 points over the same window, to 1.7%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −1.9 points over 7 quarters to 0.8%; Foreign institutions: +0.2 points over 7 quarters to 1.7%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 7 quarters to 74.8%.

🚨 Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (−1.9 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +0.0 pts from Mar 25 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 2 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
81%59%38%17%−4.4%%74.8%1.6%3.5%20.1%Mar 25Mar 26
81%59%38%17%−4.4%%74.8%1.6%3.5%20.1%Mar 25Mar 26
Domestic institutions cut 1.9 points over 7 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 8 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
81%59%38%16%−5.1%%74.8%1.7%0.8%22.7%Sep 24Jun 25Jun 26
81%59%38%16%−5.1%%74.8%1.7%0.8%22.7%Sep 24Jun 25Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Rossell Techsys Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Aerospace & Defence - Equipments
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Sigma Advanced System LtdSIGMAADV 72.6/100Favorable setup93% evidence LEADER 24.0/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -12 pp 83% evidence 16.6/25 ROCE 60.8% · OPM 17% 95% evidence 12.0/20 P/E 42.6× · PEG 2.35 100% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 105.2% · RS bench 142.5% · 1Y 494.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24 + 16.6 + 12 + 20 = 72.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Sika Interplant Systems LtdSIKA 72.6/100Favorable setup90% evidence TURNING 28.4/35 Revenue 43% · PAT 38.1% · OPM change 7.9 pp 88% evidence 21.9/25 ROCE 34.6% · OPM 25.2% 100% evidence 12.9/20 P/E 67.4× · PEG 1.01 100% evidence 9.4/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench 6% · 1Y -1.7%3 of 7 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 28.4 + 21.9 + 12.9 + 9.4 = 72.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Astra Microwave Products LtdASTRAMICRO 70.5/100Favorable setup96% evidence LEADER 21.0/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT 27% · OPM change 4 pp 88% evidence 19.4/25 ROCE 20.2% · OPM 33% 100% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 91.6× · PEG 1.19 100% evidence 19.3/20 RS sector 30.4% · RS bench 61.4% · 1Y 90.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21 + 19.4 + 10.8 + 19.3 = 70.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Paras Defence and Space Technologies LtdPARAS 66.4/100Favorable setup78% evidence LEADER 21.8/35 Revenue 30.4% · PAT 43.5% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence 16.8/25 ROCE 16.9% · OPM 25% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 118× · PEG — 50% evidence 18.6/20 RS sector 27.1% · RS bench 57.1% · 1Y 60.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.8 + 16.8 + 9.2 + 18.6 = 66.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5MTAR Technologies LtdMTARTECH 63.2/100Mixed-positive evidence90% evidence FADING 30.7/35 Revenue 53.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 6 pp 100% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 24% 100% evidence 6.3/20 P/E 129× · PEG — 50% evidence 12.3/20 RS sector 21.9% · RS bench 44.7% · 1Y 280.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 30.7 + 13.9 + 6.3 + 12.3 = 63.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Apollo Micro Systems LtdAPOLLO 59.9/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence LEADER 21.9/35 Revenue 60.9% · PAT 92.9% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 14.5% · OPM 23% 100% evidence 7.1/20 P/E 128× · PEG 1.6 100% evidence 16.7/20 RS sector 6.5% · RS bench 32% · 1Y 126.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.9 + 14.2 + 7.1 + 16.7 = 59.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7Vinyas Innovative Technologies LtdVINYAS 59.3/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence TURNING 21.7/35 Revenue 65% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3 pp 48% evidence 18.5/25 ROCE 21.4% · OPM 13% 95% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 51.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.2/20 RS sector -17.5% · RS bench 6% · 1Y -6.9%10 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 18.5 + 10.9 + 8.2 = 59.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Data Patterns (India) LtdDATAPATTNS 58.1/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence FADING 21.5/35 Revenue 33.9% · PAT 24.2% · OPM change -5 pp 100% evidence 18.6/25 ROCE 21.9% · OPM 27% 100% evidence 5.0/20 P/E 88.7× · PEG 3.94 100% evidence 13.0/20 RS sector 5% · RS bench 30.1% · 1Y 59.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 18.6 + 5 + 13 = 58.1 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
9Azad Engineering LtdAZAD 57.4/100Mixed-positive evidence89% evidence FADING 24.5/35 Revenue 32.2% · PAT 54% · OPM change 2 pp 88% evidence 12.9/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 38% 100% evidence 8.0/20 P/E 111× · PEG 2.29 65% evidence 12.0/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench 27% · 1Y 47.5%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.5 + 12.9 + 8 + 12 = 57.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Ideaforge Technology LtdIDEAFORGE 57.1/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence LEADER 24.6/35 Revenue 41% · PAT 71.4% · OPM change 152 pp 65% evidence 4.6/25 ROCE -2.8% · OPM 44% 100% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 17.9/20 RS sector 25.6% · RS bench 53.6% · 1Y 85.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.6 + 4.6 + 10 + 17.9 = 57.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Hindustan Aeronautics LtdHAL 56.2/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence BREAKING OUT 11.0/35 Revenue 6.8% · PAT 9% · OPM change -3 pp 88% evidence 21.1/25 ROCE 32% · OPM 36% 100% evidence 15.2/20 P/E 34.1× · PEG 1.18 100% evidence 8.9/20 RS sector -18.6% · RS bench 4% · 1Y 2.1%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11 + 21.1 + 15.2 + 8.9 = 56.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
12Rossell Techsys Ltdthis pageROSSTECH 54.1/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence FADING 29.0/35 Revenue 82.9% · PAT 68.8% · OPM change 1.8 pp 100% evidence 7.4/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 14.4% 100% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 136× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.7/20 RS sector -3.2% · RS bench 20.7% · 1Y 64.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 29 + 7.4 + 9 + 8.7 = 54.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Jaykay Enterprises LtdJAYKAY 49.0/100Mixed-negative evidence62% evidence ASLEEP 25.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 34 pp 62% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE 8.2% · OPM -10% 95% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -20.9% · RS bench -6.2% · 1Y 20.6%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 25.8 + 6.8 + 11.5 + 4.9 = 49 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -20.9% and the one-year return is 20.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
14Mishra Dhatu Nigam LtdMIDHANI 45.7/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence FADING 16.3/35 Revenue 12.6% · PAT 18.9% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence 13.7/25 ROCE 11.3% · OPM 21% 100% evidence 7.4/20 P/E 56.4× · PEG 5.62 100% evidence 8.3/20 RS sector -16.9% · RS bench 5.1% · 1Y -2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.3 + 13.7 + 7.4 + 8.3 = 45.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Dynamatic Technologies LtdDYNAMATECH 43.8/100Mixed-negative evidence89% evidence FADING 16.2/35 Revenue 15.5% · PAT -23.3% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence 10.2/25 ROCE 10% · OPM 11% 100% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 140× · PEG 1.42 65% evidence 7.1/20 RS sector -12.3% · RS bench 10.4% · 1Y 47.5%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.2 + 10.2 + 10.3 + 7.1 = 43.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Zen Technologies LtdZENTEC 41.9/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence ASLEEP 5.0/35 Revenue -23.4% · PAT -27.8% · OPM change -14 pp 95% evidence 16.6/25 ROCE 16.2% · OPM 27% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 80.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.8/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench 6.5% · 1Y -8.7%8 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 5 + 16.6 + 10.5 + 9.8 = 41.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17Bharat Electronics LtdBEL 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 14.0/35 Revenue 19.8% · PAT 11.8% · OPM change -3 pp 100% evidence 18.6/25 ROCE 36.5% · OPM 25% 100% evidence 7.3/20 P/E 46.1× · PEG 3.54 100% evidence 1.8/20 RS sector -28% · RS bench -8% · 1Y -1.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14 + 18.6 + 7.3 + 1.8 = 41.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18Aequs LtdAEQUS 36.4/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence BREAKING OUT 15.1/35 Revenue 44.3% · PAT — · OPM change -7.3 pp 74% evidence 1.3/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 3.7% 100% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 1.3 + 10 + 10 = 36.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19Avantel LtdAVANTEL 35.7/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence TURNING 10.1/35 Revenue -3.2% · PAT -67.2% · OPM change 4.6 pp 100% evidence 9.2/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM 24.8% 100% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 251× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.7/20 RS sector -11.9% · RS bench 0.1% · 1Y 19%8 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.1 + 9.2 + 8.7 + 7.7 = 35.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20AXISCADES Technologies LtdAXISCADES 35.4/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence ASLEEP 15.4/35 Revenue 12.4% · PAT -4.3% · OPM change -1.7 pp 88% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 15.3% · OPM 12.3% 100% evidence 4.9/20 P/E 83.6× · PEG 3.04 100% evidence 2.8/20 RS sector -21.3% · RS bench -1.3% · 1Y 13.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.4 + 12.3 + 4.9 + 2.8 = 35.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21NIBE LtdNIBE 32.4/100Adverse evidence65% evidence TURNING 9.6/35 Revenue -6.7% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3 pp 83% evidence 7.6/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 20% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 380× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.7/20 RS sector -29.8% · RS bench 11.1% · 1Y -17%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.6 + 7.6 + 8.5 + 6.7 = 32.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
22Bharat Dynamics LtdBDL 29.4/100Adverse evidence83% evidence ASLEEP 7.6/35 Revenue -27% · PAT -23.6% · OPM change -5 pp 88% evidence 12.9/25 ROCE 13.8% · OPM 12% 100% evidence 5.0/20 P/E 109× · PEG 4.44 65% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -22.4% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y -24.4%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 7.6 + 12.9 + 5 + 3.9 = 29.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
23BEML LtdBEML 26.3/100Adverse evidence90% evidence ASLEEP 6.5/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT -51.5% · OPM change -11 pp 88% evidence 5.3/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 103× · PEG 1.18 100% evidence 5.0/20 RS sector -19.9% · RS bench -6.2% · 1Y -15.6%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 6.5 + 5.3 + 9.5 + 5 = 26.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24DCX Systems LtdDCXINDIA 25.1/100Adverse evidence67% evidence ASLEEP 8.2/35 Revenue -31.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change -2 pp 83% evidence 3.4/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM -0.2% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -27% · RS bench -12.4% · 1Y -32%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 8.2 + 3.4 + 10 + 3.5 = 25.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Rossell Techsys Ltd's share price today?

Rossell Techsys Ltd trades at ₹954, +63.5% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹3,597 Cr. The stock sits at 79% of its 52-week range of ₹574–₹1,057, +16.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 54 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were Rossell Techsys Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Rossell Techsys Ltd reported revenue of ₹154 Cr and net profit of ₹7.1 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 77.1% and profit rose 116.4% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹1.89. The operating margin was 14.4%, 1.8 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Rossell Techsys Ltd's revenue?

Rossell Techsys Ltd reported revenue of ₹154 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +77.1% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹485 Cr (+86.5%). — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Rossell Techsys Ltd's profit?

Rossell Techsys Ltd earned ₹7.1 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +116.4% year on year — the 3rd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹22.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 14.4% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Rossell Techsys Ltd's market cap?

Rossell Techsys Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹3,597 Cr at a share price of ₹954. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Rossell Techsys Ltd's P/E ratio?

Rossell Techsys Ltd trades at a P/E of 136.0×, at the 68th percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 114.2×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Rossell Techsys Ltd pay a dividend?

Yes — Rossell Techsys Ltd's dividend payout was 5% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in 2 of its last 4 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Rossell Techsys Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Rossell Techsys Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 136.0× sits at the 68th percentile of its 2-year range (long-run median 114.2×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Rossell Techsys Ltd growing?

Yes — Rossell Techsys Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +77.1% year on year, profit +116.4%, and the margin +1.8 pp at 14.4%. The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.

How is Rossell Techsys Ltd performing?

Rossell Techsys Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 54 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 77.1% and profit rose 116.4% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 3 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Rossell Techsys Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 54 of stage 2), trading +16.2% versus its 200-day average and at 79% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Rossell Techsys Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Rossell Techsys Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-10), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.6 years the stock moved +77% against the NIFTY 500's +2% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.

Will Rossell Techsys Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Rossell Techsys Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹954, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 54 weeks in. Its P/E of 136.0× sits at the 68th percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns Rossell Techsys Ltd?

Promoters hold 74.8% of Rossell Techsys Ltd, foreign institutions 1.7%, domestic institutions 0.8% and the public 22.7% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions cut 1.9 points over 7 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Rossell Techsys Ltd have too much debt?

It carries real leverage — Rossell Techsys Ltd's debt-to-equity is 2.64, and operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. FY26 borrowings were ₹409 Cr against equity of ₹155 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Rossell Techsys Ltd's capex?

Rossell Techsys Ltd spent ₹48.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹23.0 Cr, with ₹2.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Rossell Techsys Ltd's cash flow?

Rossell Techsys Ltd generated ₹−83.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−106 Cr of free cash flow after ₹23.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹22.0 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Rossell Techsys Ltd's profit real cash?

Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, −302% of Rossell Techsys Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−83.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹22.0 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is Rossell Techsys Ltd in its business cycle?

Rossell Techsys Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 13.0%, against a 3-year band of 13.0%–15.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 14.4%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the Rossell Techsys Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −302% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Rossell Techsys Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Rossell Techsys Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +176.7% in a year against a +63.5% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI