Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-11
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11

Peninsula Land Ltd

PENINLAND
Realty - Construction & Contracting

Peninsula Land Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved +2.4 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.

The price is in a downtrend (50 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 98th percentile of its own 3-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating, and 90% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.

Price
₹15.6
−56.2% 1Y
P/E
53.0×
98th pctile
of its own 3-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹23.4 Cr
−37.6% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹−7.7 Cr
Operating margin
−19.4%
−43.7 pp YoY
ROCE
5%
FY26
ROIC
1.3%
vs WACC 12.0% → −10.7 pp
Cash conversion
90%
of profit, last 3 FY
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Peninsula Land Ltd trades at ₹15.6, in a downtrend and 50 weeks into that stage. That is −21.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 4% of a 52-week range of ₹15 to ₹35. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 50 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹15.6 it trades −21.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 4% of its 52-week range (₹15–₹35).

Sep 26: ₹15.6 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−21.4% versus the 200-day line, week 50 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4S4₹78.0₹61.1₹44.1₹27.2₹10.2₹16₹20Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Dec 25Sep 26
S2S4S4₹78.0₹61.1₹44.1₹27.2₹10.2₹16₹20Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (555 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Feb 16Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved −6% while the NIFTY 500 moved +273% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Peninsula Land Ltd trades at 53.0× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 15.5×, measured across 3.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 53.0× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 15.5× measured over 3.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 53.0× vs a 15.5× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 3.0-year window; loss-period spikes above 47× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
about the priciest it has ever traded
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
49.9×₹3.437.6×₹2.525.3×₹1.712.9×₹0.80.6×₹0.0×46.50×₹1May 22Feb 23Nov 23Aug 24May 25
49.9×₹3.437.6×₹2.525.3×₹1.712.9×₹0.80.6×₹0.0×46.50×₹1May 22Nov 23May 25
P/E
53.0×
98th percentile of 3y

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the −21.8%/yr price move, ~−14.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−7.2 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Peninsula Land Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 8 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −44.4% in FY26 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
152%46%96%0.0%41%−47%−15%−94%−71%−141%%%−44.4%−128.1%FY16FY21FY26
152%46%96%0.0%41%−47%−15%−94%−71%−141%%%−44.4%−128.1%FY16FY21FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
−30%232%−37%89%−43%−54%−50%−197%−57%−339%%%−50.7%−300%−300%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
−30%232%−37%89%−43%−54%−50%−197%−57%−339%%%−50.7%−300%−300%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
28%21%15%8.6%2.2%%5%FY23FY24FY26
28%21%15%8.6%2.2%%5%FY23FY24FY26
Revenue growth
Falling
latest −50.7% · span −54.9% to −31.9%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 5.0% · span 4.0%–26.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−44.4%−48.0%−11.9%+2.1%
Share price−56.2%−21.8%+6.4%−2.1%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
−37.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
2.1%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

34.0/100 — rank 24 of 26 in Realty - Construction & Contracting · 69% evidence confidence

Peninsula Land Ltd scores 34.0 out of 100 against the 26 companies it is compared with in Realty - Construction & Contracting, ranking 24. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 11.5 + 6.7 + 10 + 5.8 = 34. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Peninsula Land Ltd reported ₹23.4 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, −37.6% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 2.1% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹140 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹129 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹140 Cr (−44.4% on the year), capping 10 years at 2.1% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹23.4 Cr, −37.6% year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹140 Cr (−44.4% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
2.1% a year over 10 years
RevenueYoY growth
1.1k152%80496%53641%268−15%0−71%₹ Cr%₹140−44.4%FY16FY21FY26
1.1k152%80496%53641%268−15%0−71%₹ Cr%₹140−44.4%FY16FY21FY26
Jun 26: ₹23.4 Cr (−37.6% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
15419%116−7.8%77−35%39−62%0−90%₹ Cr%₹23−37.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
15419%116−7.8%77−35%39−62%0−90%₹ Cr%₹23−37.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −45.9% growth against the decade's 2.1% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −50.7% over the last 4 quarters against −44.5%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Peninsula Land Ltd's operating margin is −19.4% in the Jun 26 quarter, −43.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −113.0% to 23.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −19.4%, −43.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −113.0%–23.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −43.7 pp year on year while gross margin went +4.5 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: 2.5% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 13-year window.
within a −113.0–23.0% band over 13 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
34%77%−5.6%32%−45%−13%−84%−58%−124%−103%%%2.5%−2.3%FY14FY20FY26
34%77%−5.6%32%−45%−13%−84%−58%−124%−103%%%2.5%−2.3%FY14FY20FY26
Jun 26: −19.4% operating margin (−43.7 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
32%26%18%7.3%4.2%−11%−9.5%−30%−23%−49%%%−19.4%−43.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
32%26%18%7.3%4.2%−11%−9.5%−30%−23%−49%%%−19.4%−43.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Peninsula Land Ltd posted a net loss of ₹7.7 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹154 Cr. That loss is 33.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹5.0 Cr. 8 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Jun 26 profit was ₹−7.7 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−154 Cr (null).

FY26 profit ₹−154 Cr (null YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
18646%−250.0%−235−47%−446−94%−657−141%₹ Cr%₹−154−128.1%FY16FY21FY26
18646%−250.0%−235−47%−446−94%−657−141%₹ Cr%₹−154−128.1%FY16FY21FY26
Jun 26: ₹−7.7 Cr (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
44259%019%−43−222%−87−462%−130−703%₹ Cr%₹−8−636.4%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
44259%019%−43−222%−87−462%−130−703%₹ Cr%₹−8−636.4%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 90% of Peninsula Land Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹57.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−154 Cr of profit. After ₹1.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹56.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹57.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−154 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹56.0 Cr after ₹1.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 90% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹57.0 Cr vs profit ₹−154 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution. FY16 reflects an acquisition year — point shown clipped.
90% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
1.1k662199−264−727₹ Cr₹57₹−154₹56FY16FY21FY26
1.1k662199−264−727₹ Cr₹57₹−154₹56FY16FY21FY26
FY26: CFO = 141% of profit (three-year rate 90%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash; outlier years shown pinned.
Conversion100%
316%258%200%142%84%%141%FY16FY21FY26
316%258%200%142%84%%141%FY16FY21FY26

Why conversion sits at 90%: the cash cycle tightened 922 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 17.6× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Peninsula Land Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 2,078 days in FY26, down from 3,000 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹300 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹140 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.4 Cr, so roughly ₹797 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 29 days, inventory at 3,405 days — roughly 112.0 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 2,078 days, tighter than FY21's 3,000.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 3,405 days to sell; customers pay about 29 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 1,356 days — netting out to the 2,078-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹140 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.4 Cr — so the 2,078-day loop keeps roughly ₹797 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 2,078-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 13-year window.
−922 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
16,93312,3877,8413,294−1,252days2,078d3,405d29d1,356dFY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
16,93312,3877,8413,294−1,252days2,078d3,405d29d1,356dFY14FY20FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹300 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹17.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹1.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹0.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
378163−52−267−482₹ Cr₹1₹0FY16FY18FY21FY23FY26
378163−52−267−482₹ Cr₹1₹0FY16FY21FY26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Peninsula Land Ltd earns a ROCE of 5% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −16% in FY20. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −10.7 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −110.0% net margin on 0.21× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 5%, recovered from a FY20 trough of −16% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −110.0% net margin × 0.21× asset turns × 9.35× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −216.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 1.3% − 12.0% = a −10.7 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE 5% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line). 13-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY20's −16%
ROCEWACC
29%17%5.0%−7.2%−19%%5%FY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
29%17%5.0%−7.2%−19%%5%FY14FY20FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Peninsula Land Ltd carries ₹302 Cr of borrowings against ₹71.0 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 4.25. Operating profit covers the interest bill 0×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1,081 Cr to ₹302 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹300 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹302 Cr against equity of ₹71.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 4.25. Operating profit covers the interest bill 0×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1,081 Cr to ₹302 Cr while capital spending ran ₹300 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

FY26: borrowings ₹302 Cr at 4.25× equity Borrowings by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 13-year window. Quarterly balance-sheet history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
debt is falling while the business grows
BorrowingsDebt-to-equity
2.6k234.1×2.0k169.2×1.3k104.4×65439.5×0−25.4×₹ Cr×₹3024.25×FY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
2.6k234.1×2.0k169.2×1.3k104.4×65439.5×0−25.4×₹ Cr×₹3024.25×FY14FY20FY26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters added 2.4 points of Peninsula Land Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 67.7% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −0.2 points over the same window, to 0.3%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: +2.4 points over 8 quarters to 67.7%; Domestic institutions: −0.2 points over 8 quarters to 0.3%; Foreign institutions: −0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%.

Why the register moved: promoters drove it (+2.4 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +2.4 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
73%54%34%14%−5.3%%67.7%0.1%0.3%31.8%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
73%54%34%14%−5.3%%67.7%0.1%0.3%31.8%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Promoters added 2.4 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
73%53%34%14%−5.4%%67.7%0.0%0.3%31.9%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
73%53%34%14%−5.4%%67.7%0.0%0.3%31.9%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Peninsula Land Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Realty - Construction & Contracting
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Arihant Foundations & Housing LtdARIHANT 65.0/100Favorable setup81% evidence BREAKING OUT 21.1/35 Revenue 88.8% · PAT 38.8% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence 19.5/25 ROCE 17.5% · OPM 27% 95% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 14.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 13.1/20 RS sector 10.4% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y -17.6%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 19.5 + 11.3 + 13.1 = 65 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Eldeco Housing & Industries LtdELDEHSG 62.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 27.7/35 Revenue 38.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 25 pp 95% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 36% 95% evidence 6.9/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 50% evidence 13.5/20 RS sector 28.2% · RS bench -5.6% · 1Y 2.5%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 27.7 + 14 + 6.9 + 13.5 = 62.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Ashiana Housing LtdASHIANA 59.8/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 29.3/35 Revenue 37% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 13.5/25 ROCE 14% · OPM 7% 100% evidence 5.6/20 P/E 29.5× · PEG 4.68 100% evidence 11.4/20 RS sector 2.8% · RS bench 6.9% · 1Y 10.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 29.3 + 13.5 + 5.6 + 11.4 = 59.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4PVP Ventures LtdPVP 57.9/100Mixed-positive evidence72% evidence BREAKING OUT 22.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 71% evidence 6.6/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 29% 95% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 111× · PEG — 15% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 92.4% · RS bench 99.4% · 1Y 125.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.5 + 6.6 + 8.8 + 20 = 57.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Arvind SmartSpaces LtdARVSMART 56.6/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.1/35 Revenue 5.3% · PAT 48% · OPM change 28 pp 95% evidence 16.3/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 49% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 50% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector -2.4% · RS bench 1.4% · 1Y -3.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 16.3 + 10.1 + 10.1 = 56.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Raymond LtdRAYMOND 56.5/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence LEADER 18.8/35 Revenue 13.5% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 13% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 39.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.4/20 RS sector 91.8% · RS bench 98.2% · 1Y 63.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 9.3 + 9 + 19.4 = 56.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7Sunteck Realty LtdSUNTECK 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence TURNING 26.1/35 Revenue 55.5% · PAT 31.1% · OPM change 10 pp 100% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 35% 100% evidence 13.5/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG 0.87 65% evidence 5.6/20 RS sector -22.2% · RS bench -19.2% · 1Y -35.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.1 + 8.3 + 13.5 + 5.6 = 53.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -22.2% and the one-year return is -35.7%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
8Puravankara LtdPURVA 53.3/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence TURNING 25.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9 pp 71% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM 22% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 31.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.2/20 RS sector -13.6% · RS bench -5.4% · 1Y -26.5%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 25.3 + 11.3 + 9.5 + 7.2 = 53.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9AGI Infra LtdAGIIL 52.9/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence ASLEEP 19.2/35 Revenue 3.8% · PAT 43.1% · OPM change 9 pp 100% evidence 19.0/25 ROCE 20.1% · OPM 42% 100% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 33.3× · PEG 1.25 65% evidence 4.0/20 RS sector -13.1% · RS bench -9.5% · 1Y 15.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.2 + 19 + 10.7 + 4 = 52.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Kesar India Ltd543542 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence ASLEEP 14.7/35 Revenue 91.9% · PAT 12.6% · OPM change -6 pp 71% evidence 17.3/25 ROCE 23.4% · OPM 8% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 82.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.4/20 RS sector 3.2% · RS bench 7.9% · 1Y 83.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.7 + 17.3 + 8.9 + 11.4 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Ajmera Realty & Infra India LtdAJMERA 52.2/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence BASING 21.8/35 Revenue 43.3% · PAT 23.5% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence 16.8/25 ROCE 14.3% · OPM 29% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 50% evidence 4.4/20 RS sector -24.1% · RS bench -21.5% · 1Y -41.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.8 + 16.8 + 9.2 + 4.4 = 52.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Capacite Infraprojects LtdCAPACITE 52.0/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 15.5/35 Revenue 12.4% · PAT -5.6% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence 15.3/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 16% 95% evidence 14.4/20 P/E 8.8× · PEG — 50% evidence 6.8/20 RS sector -7.6% · RS bench -20.1% · 1Y -35.3%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.5 + 15.3 + 14.4 + 6.8 = 52 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
13Suratwwala Business Group LtdSBGLP 51.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence 18.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 45 pp 40% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 37% 71% evidence 13.9/20 P/E 16.8× · PEG — 50% evidence 6.2/20 RS sector -13.9% · RS bench -14.8% · 1Y -11.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-04-19 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 12.8 + 13.9 + 6.2 = 51.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Kolte Patil Developers LtdKOLTEPATIL 49.3/100Mixed-negative evidence78% evidence BREAKING OUT 15.1/35 Revenue 7.8% · PAT 47.1% · OPM change 53 pp 74% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM 21% 100% evidence 13.9/20 P/E 31.2× · PEG 0.74 65% evidence 13.3/20 RS sector 1.1% · RS bench 14% · 1Y -5.9%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 7 + 13.9 + 13.3 = 49.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 14%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
15Geecee Ventures LtdGEECEE 49.0/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence BREAKING OUT 12.1/35 Revenue -6.5% · PAT 20% · OPM change -24.9 pp 95% evidence 9.7/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 28.7% 95% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 16.7× · PEG — 50% evidence 17.8/20 RS sector 8.9% · RS bench 13% · 1Y -5.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 9.7 + 9.4 + 17.8 = 49 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 13%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
16Suraj Estate Developers LtdSURAJEST 47.9/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence ASLEEP 13.2/35 Revenue 4% · PAT 1.1% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence 17.7/25 ROCE 14.5% · OPM 37% 95% evidence 13.8/20 P/E 9.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 3.2/20 RS sector -25.6% · RS bench -22.8% · 1Y -42%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.2 + 17.7 + 13.8 + 3.2 = 47.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
17Ganesh Housing LtdGANESHHOU 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence FADING 4.3/35 Revenue -28.6% · PAT -54.1% · OPM change -46 pp 100% evidence 18.2/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 39% 100% evidence 12.4/20 P/E 24× · PEG 0.31 100% evidence 10.6/20 RS sector -0.8% · RS bench 2.9% · 1Y -11.4%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 4.3 + 18.2 + 12.4 + 10.6 = 45.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18Shriram Properties LtdSHRIRAMPPS 44.6/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence ASLEEP 19.0/35 Revenue 37% · PAT 13.6% · OPM change -12.9 pp 95% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 8% · OPM -3.9% 95% evidence 12.9/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 3.6/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y -20.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 9.1 + 12.9 + 3.6 = 44.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19Keystone Realtors LtdRUSTOMJEE 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence76% evidence BASING 17.4/35 Revenue 52.6% · PAT -26.8% · OPM change 12.7 pp 95% evidence 10.1/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 17% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 37.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 5.8/20 RS sector -11.6% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y -44%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.4 + 10.1 + 9 + 5.8 = 42.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20Omaxe LtdOMAXE 40.7/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence BREAKING OUT 13.4/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT 29.6% · OPM change 61.9 pp 71% evidence 2.3/25 ROCE -110% · OPM 1.8% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 15.0/20 RS sector 4% · RS bench 52.4% · 1Y 42.7%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 2.3 + 10 + 15 = 40.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 52.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
21Hubtown LtdHUBTOWN 39.3/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence BASING 13.5/35 Revenue 29.1% · PAT -12.2% · OPM change -4 pp 100% evidence 9.4/25 ROCE 9.5% · OPM 18% 100% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 27.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.5/20 RS sector -10.6% · RS bench -20.4% · 1Y -44.5%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.5 + 9.4 + 9.9 + 6.5 = 39.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
22Valor Estate LtdDBREALTY 37.9/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence ASLEEP 23.6/35 Revenue -49.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 24.4 pp 100% evidence 6.5/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 20.8% 100% evidence 4.3/20 P/E 440.4× · PEG 4.19 65% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -20.1% · RS bench -17.3% · 1Y -43.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.6 + 6.5 + 4.3 + 3.5 = 37.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -20.1% and the one-year return is -43.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
23Hemisphere Properties India LtdHEMIPROP 37.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BASING 10.3/35 Revenue -4.2% · PAT -46.1% · OPM change -134.2 pp 74% evidence 4.8/25 ROCE -1.1% · OPM — 64% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 12.4/20 RS sector 6.5% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y -31.6%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.3 + 4.8 + 10 + 12.4 = 37.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24Peninsula Land Ltdthis pagePENINLAND 34.0/100Adverse evidence69% evidence TURNING 11.5/35 Revenue -50.7% · PAT -80% · OPM change -43.7 pp 71% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM -19.4% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.8/20 RS sector -29% · RS bench -26.7% · 1Y -54.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.5 + 6.7 + 10 + 5.8 = 34 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25SignatureGlobal India LtdSIGNATURE 30.7/100Adverse evidence93% evidence BASING 13.0/35 Revenue -23% · PAT 100% · OPM change -11.8 pp 100% evidence 3.5/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM -8% 100% evidence 7.6/20 P/E 10.1× · PEG 3.94 65% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -19.2% · RS bench -16.1% · 1Y -31.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13 + 3.5 + 7.6 + 6.6 = 30.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
26Laxmi Goldorna House LtdLGHL 28.6/100Adverse evidence80% evidence BASING 8.8/35 Revenue 12.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change -6 pp 95% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 10.1% · OPM 12.1% 95% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 569× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.0/20 RS sector -31.5% · RS bench -28.8% · 1Y -46.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 8.8 + 10.3 + 8.5 + 1 = 28.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Peninsula Land Ltd's share price today?

Peninsula Land Ltd trades at ₹15.6, −56.2% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹517 Cr. The stock sits at 4% of its 52-week range of ₹15–₹35, −21.4% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 50 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.

What were Peninsula Land Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Peninsula Land Ltd reported revenue of ₹23.4 Cr and a net loss of ₹7.7 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−0.23. The operating margin was −19.4%, 43.7 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Peninsula Land Ltd's revenue?

Peninsula Land Ltd reported revenue of ₹23.4 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, −37.6% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹140 Cr (−44.4%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 2.1% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Peninsula Land Ltd's profit?

Peninsula Land Ltd earned ₹−7.7 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−154 Cr. The operating margin ran −19.4% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Peninsula Land Ltd's market cap?

Peninsula Land Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹517 Cr at a share price of ₹15.6. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Peninsula Land Ltd's P/E ratio?

Peninsula Land Ltd trades at a P/E of 53.0×, at the 98th percentile of its own 3-year range, against a long-run median of 15.5×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Peninsula Land Ltd pay a dividend?

Not in its latest year — Peninsula Land Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 1 of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Peninsula Land Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Peninsula Land Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 53.0× sits at the 98th percentile of its 3-year range (long-run median 15.5×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.

How is Peninsula Land Ltd performing?

Peninsula Land Ltd is in a downtrend, 50 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Peninsula Land Ltd in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 50 of stage 4), trading −21.4% versus its 200-day average and at 4% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Peninsula Land Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Peninsula Land Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved −6% against the NIFTY 500's +273% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.

Will Peninsula Land Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Peninsula Land Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹15.6, the price is in a downtrend 50 weeks in. Its P/E of 53.0× sits at the 98th percentile of its own 3-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.

Who owns Peninsula Land Ltd?

Promoters hold 67.7% of Peninsula Land Ltd, foreign institutions 0.0%, domestic institutions 0.3% and the public 31.9% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters added 2.4 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Peninsula Land Ltd have too much debt?

It carries real leverage — Peninsula Land Ltd's debt-to-equity is 4.25, and operating profit covers the interest bill 0×. FY26 borrowings were ₹302 Cr against equity of ₹71.0 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Peninsula Land Ltd's capex?

Peninsula Land Ltd spent ₹300 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹1.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Peninsula Land Ltd's cash flow?

Peninsula Land Ltd generated ₹57.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹56.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹1.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−154 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Peninsula Land Ltd's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 90% of Peninsula Land Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at -37% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY26, operating cash was ₹57.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−154 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.

Where is Peninsula Land Ltd in its business cycle?

Peninsula Land Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 2.5%, against a 13-year band of −113.0%–23.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran −19.4%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.

What could break the Peninsula Land Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved +2.4 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Peninsula Land Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Peninsula Land Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI