Kolte Patil Developers Ltd
KOLTEPATILKolte Patil Developers Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −6.1% in a year against EPS −131.1% — the market is paying now for delivery later.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −6.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −131.1% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (5 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 67th percentile of its own 11-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 272% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd trades at ₹437, in a confirmed uptrend and 5 weeks into that stage. That is +10.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 74% of a 52-week range of ₹318 to ₹478. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 8 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 5 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹437 it trades +10.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 74% of its 52-week range (₹318–₹478).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +273% while the NIFTY 500 moved +267% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 8 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd trades at 31.2× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (67th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 24.4×, measured across 10.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 31.2× is mid-range by its own standards (67th percentile), against a long-run median of 24.4× measured over 10.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −131.1% against a −6.1% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +8.2%/yr price move, ~+15.9%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−7.7 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +13.2%/yr price move, ~+5.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+7.9 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Improving Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd reads as improving on its fundamental arc. Improving — profit growth bottomed 8 quarters ago at −163.2% and has held its recovery at +47.1%, ROCE slipping at -0.1%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: a sustained climb off the trough is the setup this page is built to catch — the question moves to what you pay for it.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −57.2% | −21.0% | +1.2% | −0.3% |
| Share price | −6.1% | −3.5% | +8.2% | +13.2% |
4-Factor Sector Score
49.3/100 — rank 14 of 26 in Realty - Construction & Contracting · 78% evidence confidence
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd scores 49.3 out of 100 against the 26 companies it is compared with in Realty - Construction & Contracting, ranking 14. Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 14%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 15.1 + 7 + 13.9 + 13.3 = 49.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd reported ₹920 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +1,022.0% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at −0.3% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹735 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,573 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹735 Cr (−57.2% on the year), capping 10 years at −0.3% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹920 Cr, +1,022.0% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +219.3% growth against the decade's −0.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +7.8% over the last 4 quarters against +17.4%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's operating margin is 21.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +53.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −8.0% to 29.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 21.0%, +53.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −8.0%–29.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +52.1 pp year on year while gross margin went −4.4 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd earned ₹147 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹38.0 Cr. That is 16.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹17.0 Cr. 6 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 26 profit was ₹147 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−38.0 Cr (−134.9%).
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −139.1% vs revenue +219.3%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 272% of Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹217 Cr of operating cash against ₹−38.0 Cr of profit. After ₹113 Cr of capital spending, ₹104 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹217 Cr against reported profit of ₹−38.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹104 Cr after ₹113 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 272% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 272%: the cash cycle tightened 1,879 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 4.3× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 31 days in FY26, down from 1,910 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹190 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹735 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹2.0 Cr, so roughly ₹62.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 31 days, inventory at 3,673 days — roughly 120.8 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 31 days, tighter than FY21's 1,910.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 3,673 days to sell; customers pay about 31 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 459 days — netting out to the 31-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹735 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹2.0 Cr — so the 31-day loop keeps roughly ₹62.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹190 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹44.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹4.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd earns a ROCE of 0% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −6.5 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −5.2% net margin on 0.10× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 0%.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −5.2% net margin × 0.10× asset turns × 6.26× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −3.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 5.5% − 12.0% = a −6.5 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd carries total debt of ₹1,183 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,205 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.98. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.56 in FY22 to 0.98 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹1,183 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,205 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.98. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.56 (FY22) to 0.98 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Foreign institutions added 6.1 points of Kolte Patil Developers Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 10.6% of the company. Promoters moved +4.4 points over the same window, to 73.8%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +6.1 points over 8 quarters to 10.6%; Promoters: +4.4 points over 8 quarters to 73.8%; Domestic institutions: −1.7 points over 8 quarters to 3.3%.
Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions +6.1 points against domestic institutions −1.7 points over 8 quarters, with promoters +4.4 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Arihant Foundations & Housing LtdARIHANT | 65.0/100Favorable setup81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.1/35 Revenue 88.8% · PAT 38.8% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 19.5/25 ROCE 17.5% · OPM 27% 95% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 14.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 10.4% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y -17.6%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 19.5 + 11.3 + 13.1 = 65 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Eldeco Housing & Industries LtdELDEHSG | 62.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 27.7/35 Revenue 38.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 25 pp 95% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 36% 95% evidence | 6.9/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.5/20 RS sector 28.2% · RS bench -5.6% · 1Y 2.5%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.7 + 14 + 6.9 + 13.5 = 62.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Ashiana Housing LtdASHIANA | 59.8/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 29.3/35 Revenue 37% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 13.5/25 ROCE 14% · OPM 7% 100% evidence | 5.6/20 P/E 29.5× · PEG 4.68 100% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector 2.8% · RS bench 6.9% · 1Y 10.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.3 + 13.5 + 5.6 + 11.4 = 59.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4PVP Ventures LtdPVP | 57.9/100Mixed-positive evidence72% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 71% evidence | 6.6/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 29% 95% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 111× · PEG — 15% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 92.4% · RS bench 99.4% · 1Y 125.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 6.6 + 8.8 + 20 = 57.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Arvind SmartSpaces LtdARVSMART | 56.6/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.1/35 Revenue 5.3% · PAT 48% · OPM change 28 pp 95% evidence | 16.3/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 49% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.1/20 RS sector -2.4% · RS bench 1.4% · 1Y -3.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 16.3 + 10.1 + 10.1 = 56.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Raymond LtdRAYMOND | 56.5/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 18.8/35 Revenue 13.5% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 13% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 39.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 91.8% · RS bench 98.2% · 1Y 63.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 9.3 + 9 + 19.4 = 56.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Sunteck Realty LtdSUNTECK | 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | TURNING | 26.1/35 Revenue 55.5% · PAT 31.1% · OPM change 10 pp 100% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 35% 100% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG 0.87 65% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -22.2% · RS bench -19.2% · 1Y -35.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.1 + 8.3 + 13.5 + 5.6 = 53.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -22.2% and the one-year return is -35.7%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 8Puravankara LtdPURVA | 53.3/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | TURNING | 25.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9 pp 71% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM 22% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 31.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -13.6% · RS bench -5.4% · 1Y -26.5%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.3 + 11.3 + 9.5 + 7.2 = 53.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9AGI Infra LtdAGIIL | 52.9/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.2/35 Revenue 3.8% · PAT 43.1% · OPM change 9 pp 100% evidence | 19.0/25 ROCE 20.1% · OPM 42% 100% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 33.3× · PEG 1.25 65% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -13.1% · RS bench -9.5% · 1Y 15.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.2 + 19 + 10.7 + 4 = 52.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Kesar India Ltd543542 | 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.7/35 Revenue 91.9% · PAT 12.6% · OPM change -6 pp 71% evidence | 17.3/25 ROCE 23.4% · OPM 8% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 82.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector 3.2% · RS bench 7.9% · 1Y 83.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.7 + 17.3 + 8.9 + 11.4 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Ajmera Realty & Infra India LtdAJMERA | 52.2/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | BASING | 21.8/35 Revenue 43.3% · PAT 23.5% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 16.8/25 ROCE 14.3% · OPM 29% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.4/20 RS sector -24.1% · RS bench -21.5% · 1Y -41.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.8 + 16.8 + 9.2 + 4.4 = 52.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Capacite Infraprojects LtdCAPACITE | 52.0/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.5/35 Revenue 12.4% · PAT -5.6% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 16% 95% evidence | 14.4/20 P/E 8.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -7.6% · RS bench -20.1% · 1Y -35.3%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.5 + 15.3 + 14.4 + 6.8 = 52 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 13Suratwwala Business Group LtdSBGLP | 51.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | 18.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 45 pp 40% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 37% 71% evidence | 13.9/20 P/E 16.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -13.9% · RS bench -14.8% · 1Y -11.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-04-19 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 12.8 + 13.9 + 6.2 = 51.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Kolte Patil Developers Ltdthis pageKOLTEPATIL | 49.3/100Mixed-negative evidence78% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.1/35 Revenue 7.8% · PAT 47.1% · OPM change 53 pp 74% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 13.9/20 P/E 31.2× · PEG 0.74 65% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector 1.1% · RS bench 14% · 1Y -5.9%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 7 + 13.9 + 13.3 = 49.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 14%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 15Geecee Ventures LtdGEECEE | 49.0/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.1/35 Revenue -6.5% · PAT 20% · OPM change -24.9 pp 95% evidence | 9.7/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 28.7% 95% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 16.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 8.9% · RS bench 13% · 1Y -5.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.1 + 9.7 + 9.4 + 17.8 = 49 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 13%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 16Suraj Estate Developers LtdSURAJEST | 47.9/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.2/35 Revenue 4% · PAT 1.1% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 17.7/25 ROCE 14.5% · OPM 37% 95% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 9.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -25.6% · RS bench -22.8% · 1Y -42%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.2 + 17.7 + 13.8 + 3.2 = 47.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 17Ganesh Housing LtdGANESHHOU | 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 4.3/35 Revenue -28.6% · PAT -54.1% · OPM change -46 pp 100% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 39% 100% evidence | 12.4/20 P/E 24× · PEG 0.31 100% evidence | 10.6/20 RS sector -0.8% · RS bench 2.9% · 1Y -11.4%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.3 + 18.2 + 12.4 + 10.6 = 45.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Shriram Properties LtdSHRIRAMPPS | 44.6/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.0/35 Revenue 37% · PAT 13.6% · OPM change -12.9 pp 95% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 8% · OPM -3.9% 95% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y -20.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 9.1 + 12.9 + 3.6 = 44.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Keystone Realtors LtdRUSTOMJEE | 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence76% evidence | BASING | 17.4/35 Revenue 52.6% · PAT -26.8% · OPM change 12.7 pp 95% evidence | 10.1/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 17% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 37.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.8/20 RS sector -11.6% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y -44%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 10.1 + 9 + 5.8 = 42.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Omaxe LtdOMAXE | 40.7/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.4/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT 29.6% · OPM change 61.9 pp 71% evidence | 2.3/25 ROCE -110% · OPM 1.8% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 15.0/20 RS sector 4% · RS bench 52.4% · 1Y 42.7%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 2.3 + 10 + 15 = 40.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 52.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 21Hubtown LtdHUBTOWN | 39.3/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | BASING | 13.5/35 Revenue 29.1% · PAT -12.2% · OPM change -4 pp 100% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 9.5% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 27.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -10.6% · RS bench -20.4% · 1Y -44.5%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 9.4 + 9.9 + 6.5 = 39.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22Valor Estate LtdDBREALTY | 37.9/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.6/35 Revenue -49.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 24.4 pp 100% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 20.8% 100% evidence | 4.3/20 P/E 440.4× · PEG 4.19 65% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -20.1% · RS bench -17.3% · 1Y -43.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 6.5 + 4.3 + 3.5 = 37.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -20.1% and the one-year return is -43.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 23Hemisphere Properties India LtdHEMIPROP | 37.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | BASING | 10.3/35 Revenue -4.2% · PAT -46.1% · OPM change -134.2 pp 74% evidence | 4.8/25 ROCE -1.1% · OPM — 64% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector 6.5% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y -31.6%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.3 + 4.8 + 10 + 12.4 = 37.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Peninsula Land LtdPENINLAND | 34.0/100Adverse evidence69% evidence | TURNING | 11.5/35 Revenue -50.7% · PAT -80% · OPM change -43.7 pp 71% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM -19.4% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.8/20 RS sector -29% · RS bench -26.7% · 1Y -54.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.5 + 6.7 + 10 + 5.8 = 34 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25SignatureGlobal India LtdSIGNATURE | 30.7/100Adverse evidence93% evidence | BASING | 13.0/35 Revenue -23% · PAT 100% · OPM change -11.8 pp 100% evidence | 3.5/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM -8% 100% evidence | 7.6/20 P/E 10.1× · PEG 3.94 65% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -19.2% · RS bench -16.1% · 1Y -31.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13 + 3.5 + 7.6 + 6.6 = 30.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Laxmi Goldorna House LtdLGHL | 28.6/100Adverse evidence80% evidence | BASING | 8.8/35 Revenue 12.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change -6 pp 95% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 10.1% · OPM 12.1% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 569× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.0/20 RS sector -31.5% · RS bench -28.8% · 1Y -46.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.8 + 10.3 + 8.5 + 1 = 28.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's share price today?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd trades at ₹437, −6.1% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹3,874 Cr. The stock sits at 74% of its 52-week range of ₹318–₹478, +10.4% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 5 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.
What were Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd reported revenue of ₹920 Cr and net profit of ₹147 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹16.49. The operating margin was 21.0%, 53.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's revenue?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd reported revenue of ₹920 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +1,022.0% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹735 Cr (−57.2%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at −0.3% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's profit?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd earned ₹147 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−38.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 21.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's market cap?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹3,874 Cr at a share price of ₹437. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's P/E ratio?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd trades at a P/E of 31.2×, at the 67th percentile of its own 11-year range, against a long-run median of 24.4×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Kolte Patil Developers Ltd pay a dividend?
Not in its latest year — Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 8 of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Kolte Patil Developers Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 31.2× sits at the 67th percentile of its 11-year range (long-run median 24.4×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.
How is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd performing?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 5 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 8 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.
What stage is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd in?
Improving — profit growth bottomed 8 quarters ago at −163.2% and has held its recovery at +47.1%, ROCE slipping at -0.1%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +7.8% latest, profit growth +47.1% latest, eps growth +24.3% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 5 of stage 2), trading +10.4% versus its 200-day average and at 74% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Kolte Patil Developers Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 8 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +273% against the NIFTY 500's +267% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.
Will Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Kolte Patil Developers Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹437, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 5 weeks in. Its P/E of 31.2× sits at the 67th percentile of its own 11-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.
Who owns Kolte Patil Developers Ltd?
Promoters hold 73.8% of Kolte Patil Developers Ltd, foreign institutions 10.6%, domestic institutions 3.3% and the public 12.3% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions added 6.1 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Kolte Patil Developers Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.98, and operating profit covers the interest bill −2×. FY26 borrowings were ₹1,183 Cr against equity of ₹1,207 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's capex?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd spent ₹190 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹113 Cr, with ₹4.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's cash flow?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd generated ₹217 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹104 Cr of free cash flow after ₹113 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−38.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 272% of Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at -571% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY26, operating cash was ₹217 Cr against reported profit of ₹−38.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.
Where is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd in its business cycle?
Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's FY26 operating margin was −8.0%, against a 13-year band of −8.0%–29.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 21.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.
What could break the Kolte Patil Developers Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −6.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −131.1% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Kolte Patil Developers Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Kolte Patil Developers Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −6.1% in a year against EPS −131.1% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!