M.V.K. Agro Food Product share price today

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd's share price was ₹210.40 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 19 weeks. That is 40.8% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 42 weeks running.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹177 and ₹819, and at that close it sat 5% of the way up from that low.

Over the last 2.7 years the share price moved +154% while the NIFTY 500 moved +11%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 6 February 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

5 points on a year earlier.

1. Number of shareholders up 101% in a year

   3,324 shareholders in the September 2026 quarter, against 1,655 a year earlier.

2. Operating margin down 7.5 points on a year earlier

   10.8% in the June 2026 quarter, from 18.3%.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), M.V.K. Agro Food Product reported revenue of ₹65.5 crore, up 105.9% from ₹31.8 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹6.38 crore, up 84.9% from ₹3.45 crore.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product closed at ₹210.40 on 4 November 2026, down 63.5% from ₹576.95 a year earlier (7 November 2025). Its highest weekly close since March 2024 was ₹819.00 on 5 December 2025.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

143 weekly closes from 7 March 2024 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: M.V.K. Agro Food Product closed at ₹210.40, down 8.5% on the week and down 12.5% on the month. Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 105.9% and profit up 84.9% on a year earlier.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product has paid no dividend on the NSE since its first NSE close in our records (7 March 2024), the start of the period we checked.

No. M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 4 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product is not on any of our India lists this week.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd earned ₹6.4 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +84.9% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 3rd quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹47.0 Cr. Over 3 years profit has grown 127.3% a year on average. That is 9.7% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹3.5 Cr.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹47.0 Cr (+422.2% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +105.9% on a year earlier and the margin moved −7.5 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +278.4% and revenue +169.9%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd reported ₹65.5 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +105.9% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 3rd quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 3 years it has grown 51.0% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹320 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹354 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹320 Cr, +113.3% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +169.9% on average, against 51.0% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd's operating margin was 10.8% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 7.5 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 years it has been between 12.0% and 18.0%. The latest quarter is below every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −7.5 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −6.7 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 0% of M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, a gap worth watching. In FY26 its operations used ₹20.0 Cr of cash, against ₹47.0 Cr of profit. After ₹466 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹486 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 0% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 124 days shorter between FY23 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 35.8× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 219 days in FY26, down from 343 days in FY23. It spent ₹501 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 19 days to pay, and stock sits for 263 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹320 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹0.9 Cr, so roughly ₹192 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 19 days to pay and stock sat for 263 days, about 8.7 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 219 days, shorter than FY23's 343.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 263 days. Customers pay about 19 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 63 days. Together that makes the 219-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹501 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹14.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹177 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd's P/E is 21.4×, in the middle of its own history: higher than 44% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 25.0×, over 2.4 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +53.3% while the price moved −63.5%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

In short: the multiple is about average against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 4 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd earned a ROCE of 14% in FY26. That is up from a low of 10% in FY25. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 5.9 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses.

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

It comes from a 14.7% net margin and 0.36× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 14.7% net margin × 0.36× asset turnover × 1.95× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 10.3% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 6.1% − 12.0% = −5.9 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

The 6.1% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 10.2%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd has total debt of ₹302 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹450 Cr as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.67× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 1.84 in FY24 to 0.67 in FY26. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Promoters cut their stake in M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd by 4.7 percentage points over 7 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Promoters now own 59.8% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +0.3 points over the same period, to 0.3%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Promoters: −4.7 points over 7 quarters, to 59.8%; Domestic institutions: +0.3 points over 7 quarters, to 0.3%; Foreign institutions: +0.0 points over 7 quarters, to 0.0%.

Why the owners changed: promoters drove it (−4.7 points). They reduced their stake.

For M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

54.4 out of 100, rank 6 of 21 in Sugar, with 64% of the evidence available.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd scores 54.4 out of 100 against the 21 companies it is compared with in Sugar, ranking 6. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 20.5 + 16.8 + 9.6 + 7.5 = 54.4. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product ranks 6 of 21 Sugar companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 54.4 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Sugar, all 21 compared on one page.

M.V.K. Agro Food Product is the 11th largest of 21 Sugar companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Dalmia Bharat Sugar & Industries, Avadh Sugar & Energy and Uttam Sugar Mills. Just below it: Andhra Sugars, Godavari Biorefineries and Dhampur Sugar Mills.

Sugar companies close in size

8. Dalmia Bharat Sugar & Industries Ltd ₹3,201 crore
9. Avadh Sugar & Energy Ltd ₹1,609 crore
10. Uttam Sugar Mills Ltd ₹1,248 crore
11. M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd ₹1,162 crore
12. Andhra Sugars Ltd ₹1,065 crore
13. Godavari Biorefineries Ltd ₹1,044 crore
14. Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd ₹1,026 crore

All 21 Sugar companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1501. Punjab Chemicals & Crop Protection Ltd ₹1,166 crore · Pesticides/Agrochemicals
1502. Den Networks Ltd ₹1,163 crore · Entertainment & Media
1503. M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd ₹1,162 crore
1504. MMP Industries Ltd ₹1,161 crore · Aluminium Products
1505. PVP Ventures Ltd ₹1,157 crore · Realty - Construction & Contracting

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.