Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd
BAJAJHINDBajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved −11.6 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.
The price is in a downtrend (87 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 67th percentile of its own 7-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +77.7% year on year. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd trades at ₹16.8, in a downtrend and 87 weeks into that stage. That is −11.6% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 17% of a 52-week range of ₹16 to ₹22. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (8 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 87 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹16.8 it trades −11.6% versus its 200-day average and sits at 17% of its 52-week range (₹16–₹22).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved −19% while the NIFTY 500 moved +268% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (8 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-19) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd trades at 28.5× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (67th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 24.3×, measured across 7.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 28.5× is mid-range by its own standards (67th percentile), against a long-run median of 24.3× measured over 7.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
The latest quarter’s profit carries a one-off item larger than the operating base, so the profit curve is shown but does not vote in the stage call.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −2.2% | −4.9% | −3.9% | +1.5% |
| Share price | −27.1% | −2.8% | −2.4% | −1.8% |
4-Factor Sector Score
47.6/100 — rank 12 of 20 in Sugar · 90% evidence confidence
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd scores 47.6 out of 100 against the 20 companies it is compared with in Sugar, ranking 12. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 22.4 + 9.4 + 11.1 + 4.7 = 47.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd reported ₹1,669 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +7.4% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 1.5% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹5,455 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹5,454 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹5,455 Cr (−2.2% on the year), capping 10 years at 1.5% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹1,669 Cr, +7.4% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −2.4% growth against the decade's 1.5% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −2.2% over the last 4 quarters against −5.5%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's operating margin is 22.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +4.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −3.7% to 19.0%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 22.0%, +4.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −3.7%–19.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +4.0 pp year on year while gross margin went −8.1 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd earned ₹391 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +77.7% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹126 Cr. That is 23.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹220 Cr. 7 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was ₹391 Cr, +77.7% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹126 Cr (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY26 that was ₹230 Cr of operating cash against ₹126 Cr of profit. After ₹54.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹176 Cr was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.
FY26: operating cash of ₹230 Cr against reported profit of ₹126 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹176 Cr after ₹54.0 Cr of capital spending.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −58 days in FY26, up from −116 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹26.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹5,455 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹14.9 Cr, so roughly ₹−867 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 7 days, inventory at 203 days — roughly 6.7 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −58 days, looser than FY21's −116.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 203 days to sell; customers pay about 7 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 267 days — netting out to the −58-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹5,455 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹14.9 Cr — so the −58-day loop keeps roughly ₹−867 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹26.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹654 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹41.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd earns a ROCE of 2% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −5% in FY14. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −9.9 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 2.3% net margin on 0.38× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 2%, recovered from a FY14 trough of −5% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 2.3% net margin × 0.38× asset turns × 3.75× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 3.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 2.1% − 12.0% = a −9.9 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd carries total debt of ₹3,545 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹3,812 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.93. On the annual view that ratio went from 2.13 in FY22 to 0.93 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹3,545 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹3,812 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.93. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 2.13 (FY22) to 0.93 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions added 42.2 points of Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 50.7% of the company. Promoters moved −11.6 points over the same window, to 13.3%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: +42.2 points over 8 quarters to 50.7%; Promoters: −11.6 points over 8 quarters to 13.3%; Foreign institutions: −1.5 points over 8 quarters to 1.1%. Note the structure: promoters hold under 20% — this is a widely-held company where institutions, not a family, set the direction.
Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −1.5 points against domestic institutions +42.2 points over 8 quarters, with promoters −11.6 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd: the Z-score reads −0.22. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of −0.22 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads −0.22.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Andhra Sugars LtdANDHRSUGAR | 65.7/100Favorable setup83% evidence | FADING | 26.7/35 Revenue 22.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.8 pp 83% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 8.5% · OPM 7.5% 95% evidence | 13.0/20 P/E 11.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 8.6% · RS bench 1.9% · 1Y 2.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.7 + 12.9 + 13 + 13.1 = 65.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2DCM Shriram LtdDCMSHRIRAM | 60.5/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.8/35 Revenue 11.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 9% 100% evidence | 16.8/20 P/E 11.8× · PEG 0.44 100% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench -12% · 1Y -26%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.8 + 13 + 16.8 + 6.9 = 60.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -6.5% and the one-year return is -26%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 3Uttam Sugar Mills LtdUTTAMSUGAR | 58.4/100Mixed-positive evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.1/35 Revenue 19.2% · PAT 17.4% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 21% 95% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 8.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -9.1% · RS bench -8.2% · 1Y -17.3%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 17.1 + 11.2 + 7 = 58.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4M.V.K. Agro Food Product LtdMVKAGRO | 56.6/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17 pp 32% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 14.4% · OPM 22% 95% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 35.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector 33.8% · RS bench -37.8% · 1Y 47.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.2 + 17.6 + 8.8 + 12 = 56.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Bannari Amman Sugars LtdBANARISUG | 55.0/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | BASING | 17.9/35 Revenue 6.9% · PAT 42.3% · OPM change -9.7 pp 88% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 9.3% · OPM 1.3% 100% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 29.5× · PEG 1.75 100% evidence | 12.6/20 RS sector 0.9% · RS bench -5% · 1Y -7.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.9 + 9.6 + 12.6 = 55 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Dalmia Bharat Sugar & Industries LtdDALMIASUG | 54.2/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.6/35 Revenue -3.2% · PAT -37.7% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 8.2% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 12.3× · PEG 0.48 100% evidence | 17.2/20 RS sector 9.6% · RS bench 2.8% · 1Y -7.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 13.1 + 14.3 + 17.2 = 54.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 2.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7Dhampur Sugar Mills LtdDHAMPURSUG | 52.4/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.5/35 Revenue 1.3% · PAT 36.3% · OPM change 1.3 pp 95% evidence | 8.5/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 5.7% 95% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 12.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.4/20 RS sector 7% · RS bench 0.4% · 1Y -6.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 8.5 + 9 + 14.4 = 52.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8EID Parry (India) LtdEIDPARRY | 50.9/100Mixed-positive evidence72% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.9/35 Revenue 21.9% · PAT -22.2% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 17% · OPM 8% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 20.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -20.5% · RS bench -18.4% · 1Y -35.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 16.9 + 9.6 + 4.5 = 50.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Balrampur Chini Mills LtdBALRAMCHIN | 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.3/35 Revenue 15.8% · PAT -13.1% · OPM change -6 pp 88% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 9.3% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 2.4/20 P/E 32.7× · PEG 2.21 100% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 24% · RS bench 16.5% · 1Y -0.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.3 + 13.2 + 2.4 + 19.4 = 50.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 16.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 10Dhampur Bio Organics LtdDBOL | 48.1/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.0/35 Revenue 8% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.1 pp 71% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 1.7% 95% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 25.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector 7.7% · RS bench 1% · 1Y 10.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 6.1 + 9.7 + 11.3 = 48.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Avadh Sugar & Energy LtdAVADHSUGAR | 47.7/100Mixed-negative evidence83% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 8.9/35 Revenue 2.2% · PAT -34.8% · OPM change -4 pp 83% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 6.8% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.1/20 RS sector 24.1% · RS bench 16.2% · 1Y 8.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.9 + 11.6 + 8.1 + 19.1 = 47.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 16.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 12Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltdthis pageBAJAJHIND | 47.6/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.4/35 Revenue -2.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 4 pp 88% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 28.5× · PEG 1.32 100% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -21% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y -33.2%6 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 9.4 + 11.1 + 4.7 = 47.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Godavari Biorefineries LtdGODAVARIB | 44.3/100Mixed-negative evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.1/35 Revenue 6.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change -4 pp 83% evidence | 9.2/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM 15% 95% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 39.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -2.3% · RS bench -8.3% · 1Y -17.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 9.2 + 8.7 + 6.3 = 44.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Zuari Industries LtdZUARIIND | 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence62% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.8/35 Revenue 7.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 62% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 11% 95% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 6.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -26.8% · RS bench -10.8% · 1Y -2.4%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 8.1 + 11.5 + 4.7 = 43.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Triveni Engineering and Industries LtdTRIVENI | 36.7/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.0/35 Revenue 4% · PAT 29.1% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 6.8% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence | 6.8/20 P/E 18.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.3/20 RS sector -33.2% · RS bench -3.8% · 1Y -39.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 9.6 + 6.8 + 2.3 = 36.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Davangere Sugar Company LtdDAVANGERE | 36.3/100Mixed-negative evidence70% evidence | 14.4/35 Revenue 11.1% · PAT -22.3% · OPM change -6.9 pp 83% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 10.1% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 58.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -25% · RS bench -12.6% · 1Y -47%1 of 8 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 8.9 + 8.5 + 4.5 = 36.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Magadh Sugar & Energy LtdMAGADSUGAR | 36.0/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 6.4/35 Revenue -5.9% · PAT -41.3% · OPM change -5 pp 83% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 7.8% · OPM 27% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -19.1% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y -11.1%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.4 + 11.9 + 10.1 + 7.6 = 36 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Dwarikesh Sugar Industries LtdDWARKESH | 35.1/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.7/35 Revenue 20.1% · PAT -80% · OPM change -8.2 pp 31% evidence | 3.7/25 ROCE 5% · OPM -7.2% 80% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 25.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -5.6% · RS bench -11.4% · 1Y -17.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 3.7 + 9.5 + 5.2 = 35.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Shree Renuka Sugars LtdRENUKA | 17.1/100Adverse evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 2.4/35 Revenue -15.2% · PAT -80% · OPM change -9.5 pp 88% evidence | 0.6/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM 1.5% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.1/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench -18.2% · 1Y -29.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 2.4 + 0.6 + 10 + 4.1 = 17.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20DCM Shriram Industries LtdDCMSRIND | 43.1/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | 12.3/35 Revenue -3.7% · PAT -50% · OPM change -6.8 pp 45% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 13.7% · OPM 1.8% 71% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 8.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench -16.3% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 12.3 + 14 + 8.8 + 8 = 43.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's share price today?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd trades at ₹16.8, −27.1% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹4,004 Cr. The stock sits at 17% of its 52-week range of ₹16–₹22, −11.6% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 87 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd reported revenue of ₹1,669 Cr and net profit of ₹391 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 7.4% and profit rose 77.7% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹1.65. The operating margin was 22.0%, 4.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's revenue?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd reported revenue of ₹1,669 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +7.4% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹5,455 Cr (−2.2%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 1.5% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's profit?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd earned ₹391 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +77.7% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹126 Cr. The operating margin ran 22.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's market cap?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹4,004 Cr at a share price of ₹16.8. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's P/E ratio?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd trades at a P/E of 28.5×, at the 67th percentile of its own 7-year range, against a long-run median of 24.3×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 28.5× sits at the 67th percentile of its 7-year range (long-run median 24.3×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd growing?
Yes — Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +7.4% year on year, profit +77.7%, and the margin +4.0 pp at 22.0%. The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.
How is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd performing?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd is in a downtrend, 87 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 7.4% and profit rose 77.7% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 8 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 87 of stage 4), trading −11.6% versus its 200-day average and at 17% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (8 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-19), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved −19% against the NIFTY 500's +268% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹16.8, the price is in a downtrend 87 weeks in. Its P/E of 28.5× sits at the 67th percentile of its own 7-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd?
Promoters hold 13.3% of Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd, foreign institutions 1.1%, domestic institutions 50.7% and the public 34.8% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions added 42.2 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.93, and operating profit covers the interest bill 11×. FY26 borrowings were ₹3,545 Cr against equity of ₹3,811 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's capex?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd spent ₹26.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹54.0 Cr, with ₹41.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's cash flow?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd generated ₹230 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹176 Cr of free cash flow after ₹54.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹126 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
How financially safe is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads −0.22 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd in its business cycle?
Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 7.0%, against a 13-year band of −3.7%–19.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 22.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved −11.6 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.