Latent View Analytics share price today

Latent View Analytics Ltd's share price was ₹194.50 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 37 weeks. That is 35.9% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹195 and ₹498, and at that close it was at the low of that range.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Latent View Analytics Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 20 weeks running.

Over the last 4.9 years the share price moved −72% while the NIFTY 500 moved +48%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 25 June 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Three changes stood out: revenue up on a year earlier for 12 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare), foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 3 quarters in a row and indian funds and insurers (DIIs) cut their stake for 3 quarters in a row.

1. Revenue up on a year earlier for 12 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare)

   In the September 2026 quarter revenue was ₹294 crore, +14% on a year earlier.

2. Foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 3 quarters in a row

   From 3.7% to 0.8% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

3. Indian funds and insurers (DIIs) cut their stake for 3 quarters in a row

   From 4.2% to 3% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), Latent View Analytics reported revenue of ₹294 crore, up 14.0% from ₹258 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹48.0 crore, up 4.3% from ₹46.0 crore.

Latent View Analytics results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

The newest call in our records is from 3 August 2026, about April to June 2026; a call about these results is not in our records yet.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Latent View Analytics closed at ₹194.50 on 4 November 2026, down 55.4% from ₹436.55 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and down 72.1% over five years. Its highest weekly close since November 2021 was ₹697.60 on 26 November 2021.

Latent View Analytics share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

262 weekly closes from 26 November 2021 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: Latent View Analytics closed at ₹194.50, down 7.6% on the week and down 17.1% on the month. Results for July to September 2026: Revenue up 14.0% and profit up 4.3% on a year earlier.

Earlier

• 3 Aug 2026: Latent View Analytics held its results call for April to June 2026. Management guided: FY revenue growth guidance retained at 12%.

Latent View Analytics has paid no dividend on the NSE since its first NSE close in our records (26 November 2021), the start of the period we checked.

No. Latent View Analytics Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 10 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for April to June 2026, held on 3 August 2026, Latent View Analytics' management guided: FY revenue growth guidance retained at 12%.

“The more choice that is available at each layer of the stack, and the greater the interest among enterprises in retaining their competitive advantage within their own premises, the more complexity there will be in decision-making.”Rajan, on the call for April to June 2026

What management guided

• Q2 sequential trajectory expected to bounce back; Consumer Goods planned to return to 25%+ on the previous quarter growth, supported by $2 million of extensions in progress and close to $26 million of pipeline; conversion required.
• Technology growth is expected to continue, supported by a $15 million+ pipeline and 14+ opportunities that could each generate close to half a million dollars of current-year revenue.
• FY operating margin guidance was stated as 21-22% and, separately, 20-21% for the year's growth profile; no reconciliation was offered.
• $200 million revenue goal by FY28-FY29 remains dependent on organic acceleration plus inorganic activity; the organic and inorganic split was not quantified.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for April to June 2026, 3 August 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

When Latent View Analytics reports October to December 2026, these are the 3 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Consumer Goods follow-on conversions and extensions - check whether the promised sequential recovery materializes.

Latent View Analytics is on 3 of our India lists: 52 week high & low, AI & data centre stocks and IT stocks.

Latent View Analytics Ltd earned ₹48.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, +4.3% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹202 Cr. Over 13 years profit has grown 28.2% a year on average. That is 16.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹46.0 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹202 Cr (+16.8% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +14.0% on a year earlier and the margin moved −2.0 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +5.7% and revenue +20.5%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Latent View Analytics Ltd reported ₹294 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +14.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 12th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 13 years it has grown 30.6% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,060 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,148 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹1,060 Cr, +25.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +20.5% on average, against 30.6% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +20.3%, against +25.7% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over); profit over the last 12 months grew +5.2%, against +8.1% a year (stabilising).

Latent View Analytics Ltd's operating margin was 20.0% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 2.0 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 10 years it has been between 21.0% and 36.0%. The latest quarter is below every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −1.5 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +0.0 points. So the drop came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales.

Over the last 3 years, 77% of Latent View Analytics Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so most of the profit is real cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹165 Cr of operating cash against ₹202 Cr of profit. After ₹28.0 Cr of spending on assets, ₹137 Cr was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 77% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle stayed about the same between FY21 and FY26, so the cash follows profit, not the cycle.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 5.7× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Latent View Analytics Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 80 days in FY26, up from 73 days in FY21. It spent ₹454 Cr on assets over the last 3 years.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹1,060 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹2.9 Cr, so roughly ₹232 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

Spending on assets: ₹454 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹80.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹0.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Latent View Analytics Ltd's P/E is 20.2×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 54.4×, over 4.9 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +13.4% while the price moved −55.4%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 5 years the price moved −22.5% a year; about +15.7% a year came from earnings growth and about −38.2 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 4.0% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Latent View Analytics Ltd's business is slowing from a peak. Profit and EPS growth have slowed sharply (profit growth from +16.7% at its peak to +5.2% now), while ROCE is still 16.0%. This is based on 9 quarters of 4 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: slowing from a peak is where good stories often end quietly.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Latent View Analytics Ltd earned a ROCE of 16% in FY26. That is up from a low of 15% in FY24. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a 19.1% net margin and 0.51× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 19.1% net margin × 0.51× asset turnover × 1.19× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 11.6% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The quarterly return lines and the return-on-capital-used (ROIC) line, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 4.0% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Latent View Analytics Ltd had ₹33.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹1,756 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 0.02× its equity. Its operating profit is 24 times its interest bill. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹52.0 Cr to ₹33.0 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹454 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

The spending on assets is being paid for from cash, not new debt.

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 4.0% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Foreign institutions cut their stake in Latent View Analytics Ltd by 1.9 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Foreign institutions now own 0.8% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −0.7 points over the same period, to 3.0%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Foreign institutions: −1.9 points over 8 quarters, to 0.8%; Domestic institutions: −0.7 points over 8 quarters, to 3.0%; Promoters: −0.3 points over 8 quarters, to 65.0%.

Why the owners changed: foreign institutions drove it (−1.9 points), together with domestic institutions (−0.7 points). They reduced their stake.

For Latent View Analytics Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

53.4 out of 100, rank 8 of 12 in IT Enabled Services, with 67% of the evidence available.

Latent View Analytics Ltd scores 53.4 out of 100 against the 12 companies it is compared with in IT Enabled Services, ranking 8. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 17.1 + 15.8 + 13 + 7.5 = 53.4. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Latent View Analytics ranks 8 of 12 IT Enabled Services companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 53.4 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: IT Enabled Services, all 12 compared on one page.

Latent View Analytics is the 4th largest of 12 IT Enabled Services companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Firstsource Solutions, eClerx Services and Happiest Minds Technologies. Just below it: Route Mobile, RPSG Ventures and Protean eGov Technologies.

IT Enabled Services companies close in size

1. Firstsource Solutions Ltd ₹20,709 crore
2. eClerx Services Ltd ₹14,641 crore
3. Happiest Minds Technologies Ltd ₹4,532 crore
4. Latent View Analytics Ltd ₹4,357 crore
5. Route Mobile Ltd ₹2,764 crore
6. RPSG Ventures Ltd ₹2,661 crore
7. Protean eGov Technologies Ltd ₹2,572 crore

All 12 IT Enabled Services companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

886. Juniper Hotels Ltd ₹4,364 crore · Hotels
887. Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd ₹4,364 crore · Solar Pumps
888. Latent View Analytics Ltd ₹4,357 crore
889. Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Ltd ₹4,347 crore · Industrial Gas
890. NRB Bearings Ltd ₹4,340 crore · Bearings

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.