Aurum Proptech Ltd
AURUMAurum Proptech Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 97th percentile of its own range says the market knows.
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −24% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (13 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 97th percentile of its own 10-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and −24% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Aurum Proptech Ltd trades at ₹224, in a confirmed uptrend and 13 weeks into that stage. That is +12.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 80% of a 52-week range of ₹164 to ₹239. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 21 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 13 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹224 it trades +12.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 80% of its 52-week range (₹164–₹239).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved −32% while the NIFTY 500 moved +273% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 21 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Story check
Aurum Proptech Ltd's story is not scored yet against the markers our research file set on 22 August 2026. Where it sits in its own cycle: MID_EXPANSION. Still open: Housing.com's annualized burn does not decline below ₹100 Cr within four quarters of closing, rental EBITDA turns negative again, or distribution margins fall below 18% for two consecutive quarters.
Our read, 22 August 2026. Aurum's distribution platform is profitable, but the reported Q1 FY27 PAT was dominated by discontinued building-sale income while Housing.com adds a material turnaround burden.
From the numbers. The operating cycle is MID_EXPANSION, but normalized valuation cannot be determined because the normalized EPS bridge and usable PE distribution are unavailable. The current 1707.3x trailing PE is distorted by a newly…
From the price. Price stage 2, week 13 — above its 200-day line, relative strength falling.
From the research. Aurum's distribution platform is profitable, but the reported Q1 FY27 PAT was dominated by discontinued building-sale income while Housing.com adds a material turnaround burden.
🚨 Where they disagree. The operating cycle is MID_EXPANSION, but normalized valuation cannot be determined because the normalized EPS bridge and usable PE distribution are unavailable. The current 1707.3x trailing PE is distorted by a newly positive earnings base and should not be treated as a conventional multiple.
What is proven. Aurum's distribution platform is profitable, but the reported Q1 FY27 PAT was dominated by discontinued building-sale income while Housing.com adds a material turnaround burden.
What is not proven yet. Housing.com's annualized burn does not decline below ₹100 Cr within four quarters of closing, rental EBITDA turns negative again, or distribution margins fall below 18% for two consecutive quarters.
🚨 What would change our mind. Housing.com's annualized burn does not decline below ₹100 Cr within four quarters of closing, rental EBITDA turns negative again, or distribution margins fall below 18% for two consecutive quarters.
🚨 Layer 1 read, 22 August 2026 — DROP. The profit that looked like a turnaround was a building sale - the real business earned 2.3 crore. Reported quarterly profit of 45 crore and earnings per share of 6.33 look like a violent turnaround, but 52.4 crore of pre-tax profit came from selling a building - 95.8% of the quarter's total - while the continuing business earned 2.3 crore. On top of that, the newly acquired Housing.com was burning roughly 200 crore a year on FY25 numbers, set against a distribution arm that made 8.0 crore in the quarter and told investors revenue fell on commission-slab resets. The operating trend IS genuinely better - margin 26% against losses three years ago - but there is not yet a recurring profit to value, which is why the 1,748x price-to-earnings ratio is a symptom rather than the problem.
What would change Layer 1’s mind. Two consecutive quarters where continuing-operations pre-tax profit alone exceeds 8 crore, with no discontinued or exceptional item in the line - management's own Q4 FY27 milestone M4 - would prove there is a recurring business under the disposals and flip this to a real early-innings turn. Conversely, the timeline's own kill-switch is one quarter from tripping: distribution segment margin was 14.3% in Q1 FY27 against a 20-25% guide, and a second consecutive quarter below 18% breaks the thesis…
The test written in advance. Housing.com's annualized burn does not decline below ₹100 Cr within four quarters of closing, rental EBITDA turns negative again, or distribution margins fall below 18% for two consecutive quarters. — the thesis as written as stated by the next result.
What the company does. Distribution generated ₹55.9 Cr revenue and ₹8.0 Cr segment profit in Q1 FY27, while rental businesses reported EBITDA profitability. Q1 FY27 PAT of ₹45 Cr included ₹52.4 Cr discontinued-operations PBT from a building sale; continuing PBT was ₹2.3 Cr. Housing.com's approximately ₹200 Cr annualized burn must decline within the stated four-to-six-quarter turnaround window.
| Dial | Now | Was | Why it matters | Watch line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distribution Segment Operating Leverage | in play | — | PropTiger, Sell.do and Analytica are the near-term operating contributor. | Developer demand weakens or distribution margins compress materially. |
| Housing.com Discovery-to-Transaction… | in play | — | Housing.com adds consumer intent, but its burn must be reduced through integration. | Traffic does not convert into transactions or the annualized burn remains near ₹200 Cr after the guided window. |
| Rental Portfolio Rationalization | in play | — | Rental EBITDA improvement depends on occupancy and operational efficiency. | Occupancy falls materially or rental EBITDA returns to losses. |
| Asset Monetisation and Deleveraging | in play | — | Building monetisation can reduce finance charges but does not create recurring earnings. | Asset-sale proceeds do not reduce liabilities or operating profitability remains dependent on disposals. |
🚨 What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: Q1 FY27 reported revenue, operating profit, margin, PAT and EPS were positive. The research reads it further: Reported PAT is not equivalent to recurring operating profit because discontinued-operations income was material.
🚨 What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: Q3 FY26 reported a small positive PAT. The research reads it further: Other income means the sign change alone does not establish recurring profit.
Lever 1 · Operating leverage — BUILDING. PropTiger, Sell.do and Analytica are the near-term operating contributor. What proves it keeps working: Distribution Segment Operating Leverage. It stops working if Developer demand weakens or distribution margins compress materially.
Sources: our stock research file (22 August 2026) · quarterly results through Jun 26 · the company’s own earnings calls. The story check is re-scored every results season; the record below never changes.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Aurum Proptech Ltd reported ₹112 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +72.3% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at −6.6% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹381 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹430 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹381 Cr (+50.6% on the year), capping 10 years at −6.6% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹112 Cr, +72.3% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +63.8% growth against the decade's −6.6% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +64.1% over the last 4 quarters against +35.3%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.
FY26-Q4. revenue ₹124 Cr and profit ₹16 Cr as reported.
FY27-Q1. revenue ₹112 Cr and profit ₹45 Cr as reported.
Why-sources: our stock research file (22 August 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Aurum Proptech Ltd's operating margin is 26.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +9.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −120.0% to 22.0%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
Why this happened. Q1 FY27 rental revenue was ₹54.4 Cr across 21 cities; management reported 81.0% occupancy and EBITDA profitability for both rental businesses.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 26.0%, +9.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −120.0%–22.0%, and FY26's 22.0% is the top of that band — a record year.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +8.8 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
FY26-Q4. revenue ₹124 Cr and profit ₹16 Cr as reported.
FY27-Q1. revenue ₹112 Cr and profit ₹45 Cr as reported.
Why-sources: our stock research file (22 August 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Aurum Proptech Ltd earned ₹45.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹12.0 Cr. That is 40.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹10.0 Cr. 9 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 26 profit was ₹45.0 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−12.0 Cr (null).
FY26-Q4. revenue ₹124 Cr and profit ₹16 Cr as reported.
FY27-Q1. revenue ₹112 Cr and profit ₹45 Cr as reported.
Why-sources: our stock research file (22 August 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years −24% of Aurum Proptech Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹63.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−12.0 Cr of profit. After ₹192 Cr of capital spending, ₹−129 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹63.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−12.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−129 Cr after ₹192 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −24% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why conversion sits at −24%: the cash cycle stretched 50 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.
Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 50 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Aurum Proptech Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 50 days in FY26, up from 0 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹539 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹381 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.0 Cr, so roughly ₹52.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 50 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 50 days, looser than FY21's 0.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹381 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.0 Cr — so the 50-day loop keeps roughly ₹52.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹539 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹257 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹7.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
Aurum Proptech Ltd earns a ROCE of 1% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −16% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −12.2 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −3.1% net margin on 0.40× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 1%, recovered from a FY23 trough of −16% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −3.1% net margin × 0.40× asset turns × 1.87× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −2.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −0.2% − 12.0% = a −12.2 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified
Aurum Proptech Ltd carries total debt of ₹225 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹510 Cr as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.44. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.04 in FY22 to 0.44 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Why this happened. FY26 distribution revenue was ₹172.55 Cr with ₹32.30 Cr segment profit. Q1 FY27 distribution revenue was ₹55.9 Cr and segment profit was ₹8.0 Cr despite slab resets.
Jun 26: total debt of ₹225 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹510 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.44. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.04 (FY22) to 0.44 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Promoters cut 2.1 points of Aurum Proptech Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 47.9% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +0.4 points over the same window, to 0.4%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: −2.1 points over 8 quarters to 47.9%; Foreign institutions: +0.4 points over 8 quarters to 0.4%.
🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−2.1 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Aurum Proptech Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Aurum Proptech Ltd trades at 1,719.0× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (97th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 88.3×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 1,719.0× is at the pricey end of its own range (97th percentile), against a long-run median of 88.3× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +28.2%/yr price move, ~−54.5%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+82.7 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the −4.5%/yr price move, ~−17.7%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+13.2 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.
Solved at its 26 August 2026 price, Aurum Proptech Ltd was paying for profit growth of about 20.5% a year. Today the market pays 1,719.0× P/E, the 97th percentile of its own 10-year range.
What the two numbers say together. The multiple is full against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is the whole of what a buyer is backing.
How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 26 August 2026, not a running figure — every other number on this page, the multiple included, is read off the live quote as of 11 September 2026. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Aurum Proptech Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 8 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +50.6% | +44.2% | +107.1% | −6.6% |
| Share price | +31.1% | +20.0% | +28.2% | −4.5% |
4-Factor Sector Score
61.6/100 — rank 3 of 12 in IT Enabled Services · 72% evidence confidence
Aurum Proptech Ltd scores 61.6 out of 100 against the 12 companies it is compared with in IT Enabled Services, ranking 3. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 27 + 6.7 + 8.5 + 19.4 = 61.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Said versus delivered
What Aurum Proptech Ltd's management promised, set against what actually arrived — 4 tracked promises on the record. Read straight from the company’s own earnings calls. A promise that slipped stays on this page after it is met.
🚨 Nestr Dubai and NestAway Resale Growth Commitments Silently Abandoned · 27 April 2026. In the Oct 2025 call, management explicitly named Nestr Dubai as one of three key H2 FY26 growth levers, committing it would deliver 'substantial quantum of revenue in the next 2 quarters' (i.e., by Q4 FY26), while NestAway's resale platform was simultaneously reported to have achieved '4x growth in monthly revenue run rate.' Neither the Jan 2026 Q3 call nor the Apr 2026 Q4 call makes any reference to Dubai revenue contribution or NestAway resale progress, and management offered no explanation for why these two specifically highlighted initiatives failed to materialise as projected within the stated timeframe. Later call (Apr 2026): “The rental business maintained its stability and resilience, adding to the overall profitability of the platform. In Q4, the average occupancy across the HelloWorld portfolio stood at approximately 92%, up from 90% in the previous quarter.”
Ecosystem Revenue Formal Tracking Pledge Reversed One Quarter Later · 27 April 2026. In the Jan 2026 Q3 call, CEO Ashish Deora publicly committed that ecosystem/cross-sell revenue would be 'the next measurable metric from our side' to be formally tracked 'over at least the next 12 quarters,' with detailed metrics promised in forthcoming quarters. In the very next earnings call (Apr 2026), he acknowledged cross-sell revenues remain 'in single digit' and described building an ecosystem revenue tracking framework as a FY27 goal — directly contradicting the formal commitment made just one quarter prior, without any explanation for why it was not executed in Q4 FY26. Later call (Apr 2026): “we have not been able to do justice to the ecosystem revenue that we call ourselves...Those numbers are still in single digit. And that is one focus that we have this year to start evaluating internally that how much of the revenue is coming as a cross-sell revenue.”
🚨 Rental Segment Growth Drops Below Guided 30-40% Range Without Acknowledgment · 27 April 2026. In the Oct 2025 call, management guided for 30-40% Y-o-Y rental segment growth, characterising it as consistent historical performance that would continue. By Q3 FY26 (Jan 2026), rental growth was already tracking at only 24% Y-o-Y, and the full year FY26 rental segment (continuing operations) delivered 27.4% — below the stated 30% floor. The Apr 2026 call contains no acknowledgment of the guidance miss and no explanation for the shortfall despite two consecutive quarters of sub-range performance. Later call (Apr 2026): “For the full year ended March 31st 2026, rental segment revenue from continuing operations INR 200.71 crore, compared to INR 157.54 crore in previous year, an increase of 27.4%.”
🚨 Rental Revenue Growth Guidance Miss · 21 January 2026. In the October 2025 call, management explicitly guided for 30-40% year-over-year growth for the rental segment in H2. However, the January 2026 call reported only 24% growth, missing the lower end of their own range established just one quarter prior without explaining the deceleration. Earlier call (Oct 2025): “The rental segment overall will grow between 30%-40% on a Y-o-Y basis, which has been our consistent performance so far as well.” Later call (Jan 2026): “The rental business sustained its growth momentum with 55 crores in revenue, up 24% year-over-year.”
Every quote above is taken word for word from the company’s own earnings calls.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1eClerx Services LtdECLERX | 75.3/100Favorable setup100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.0/35 Revenue 23.2% · PAT 27.4% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 19.5/25 ROCE 34.4% · OPM 23% 100% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 24.5× · PEG 0.58 100% evidence | 18.0/20 RS sector 8.7% · RS bench 3.3% · 1Y -11.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26 + 19.5 + 11.8 + 18 = 75.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Alldigi Tech LtdALLDIGI | 64.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 19.7/35 Revenue 8% · PAT 30.3% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 22.0/25 ROCE 27.9% · OPM 28% 95% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 13.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector 5.2% · RS bench -3% · 1Y -15.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 22 + 10.4 + 12.3 = 64.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Aurum Proptech Ltdthis pageAURUM | 61.6/100Mixed-positive evidence72% evidence | LEADER | 27.0/35 Revenue 64.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9 pp 71% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 26% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 1719× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 25.9% · RS bench 20.9% · 1Y 27.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27 + 6.7 + 8.5 + 19.4 = 61.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Firstsource Solutions LtdFSL | 57.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | FADING | 22.4/35 Revenue 19.7% · PAT 6.8% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 16.3/25 ROCE 16.8% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 12.7/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 0.85 100% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench -11.3% · 1Y -29.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 16.3 + 12.7 + 6.3 = 57.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Happiest Minds Technologies LtdHAPPSTMNDS | 57.4/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.5/35 Revenue 11.5% · PAT 16.8% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 13.3% · OPM 19% 100% evidence | 12.8/20 P/E 21.6× · PEG 1.4 100% evidence | 7.9/20 RS sector -1.4% · RS bench -19.8% · 1Y -41.5%3 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 14.2 + 12.8 + 7.9 = 57.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6One Point One Solutions LtdONEPOINT | 57.3/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.6/35 Revenue 52.3% · PAT 32.4% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 10.9% · OPM 23% 95% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 32.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 12.7% · RS bench 8% · 1Y 27.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 11.3 + 9.2 + 13.2 = 57.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Latent View Analytics LtdLATENTVIEW | 49.3/100Mixed-negative evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.3/35 Revenue 22.9% · PAT 7% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 15.8% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 26.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -16.7% · RS bench -28.8% · 1Y -41.2%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 15.8 + 10.7 + 3.5 = 49.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Route Mobile LtdROUTE | 45.0/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.5/35 Revenue -0.3% · PAT -14.2% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 14.6/25 ROCE 17.4% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 14.7/20 P/E 8.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench -14.9% · 1Y -42.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.5 + 14.6 + 14.7 + 6.2 = 45 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 9IRIS Regtech Solutions LtdIRIS | 43.0/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 15.1/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change -6.1 pp 95% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 10.6% · OPM -5.1% 95% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 39.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.6/20 RS sector -4.2% · RS bench -8.8% · 1Y -29.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 7.5 + 10.8 + 9.6 = 43 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10RPSG Ventures LtdRPSGVENT | 42.8/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.7/35 Revenue 18.5% · PAT -80% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 8.6/25 ROCE 10.6% · OPM 21% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.5/20 RS sector 6.5% · RS bench 1.9% · 1Y -5.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.7 + 8.6 + 10 + 11.5 = 42.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Protean eGov Technologies LtdPROTEAN | 40.2/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.1/35 Revenue 21.4% · PAT -13.3% · OPM change -2.8 pp 100% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE 12.7% · OPM 5% 100% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 23.3× · PEG 1.9 100% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -25.8% · RS bench -23.9% · 1Y -44.1%4 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 9.5 + 12.3 + 3.3 = 40.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Hinduja Global Solutions LtdHGS | 19.9/100Adverse evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 2.9/35 Revenue -1.5% · PAT -43.1% · OPM change -6 pp 95% evidence | 2.3/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM -3.3% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -5.8% · RS bench -10.3% · 1Y -26.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 2.9 + 2.3 + 10 + 4.7 = 19.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Aurum Proptech Ltd's share price today?
Aurum Proptech Ltd trades at ₹224, +31.1% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹1,615 Cr. The stock sits at 80% of its 52-week range of ₹164–₹239, +12.1% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 13 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.
What were Aurum Proptech Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Aurum Proptech Ltd reported revenue of ₹112 Cr and net profit of ₹45.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹6.33. The operating margin was 26.0%, 9.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Aurum Proptech Ltd's revenue?
Aurum Proptech Ltd reported revenue of ₹112 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +72.3% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹381 Cr (+50.6%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at −6.6% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Aurum Proptech Ltd's profit?
Aurum Proptech Ltd earned ₹45.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−12.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 26.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Aurum Proptech Ltd's market cap?
Aurum Proptech Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹1,615 Cr at a share price of ₹224. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Aurum Proptech Ltd's P/E ratio?
Aurum Proptech Ltd trades at a P/E of 1,719.0×, at the 97th percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 88.3×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Aurum Proptech Ltd pay a dividend?
Not in its latest year — Aurum Proptech Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 4 of its last 12 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Aurum Proptech Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Aurum Proptech Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 1,719.0× sits at the 97th percentile of its 10-year range (long-run median 88.3×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. One caveat: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. — as of 11 September 2026.
How is Aurum Proptech Ltd performing?
Aurum Proptech Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 13 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 21 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Aurum Proptech Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 13 of stage 2), trading +12.1% versus its 200-day average and at 80% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Aurum Proptech Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Aurum Proptech Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 21 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved −32% against the NIFTY 500's +273% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.
Will Aurum Proptech Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Aurum Proptech Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹224, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 13 weeks in. Its P/E of 1,719.0× sits at the 97th percentile of its own 10-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.
Who owns Aurum Proptech Ltd?
Promoters hold 47.9% of Aurum Proptech Ltd, foreign institutions 0.4%, domestic institutions null% and the public 51.7% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 2.1 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Aurum Proptech Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Aurum Proptech Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.44, and operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. FY26 borrowings were ₹225 Cr against equity of ₹506 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Aurum Proptech Ltd's capex?
Aurum Proptech Ltd spent ₹539 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹192 Cr, with ₹7.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Aurum Proptech Ltd's cash flow?
Aurum Proptech Ltd generated ₹63.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−129 Cr of free cash flow after ₹192 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−12.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Aurum Proptech Ltd's profit real cash?
No — operating cash was negative over the last 3 fiscal years: Aurum Proptech Ltd consumed cash while reporting profit. In FY26, operating cash was ₹63.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−12.0 Cr. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.
Where is Aurum Proptech Ltd in its business cycle?
Aurum Proptech Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 22.0%, against a 11-year band of −120.0%–22.0%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 26.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.
What growth does Aurum Proptech Ltd's price assume?
At its price on 26 August 2026, Aurum Proptech Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 20.5% a year. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 11 September 2026.
What could break the Aurum Proptech Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −24% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Aurum Proptech Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Aurum Proptech Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 97th percentile of its own range says the market knows. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!