Rent the Runway, Inc.
RENTRent the Runway, Inc.'s balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is between stages. But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Rent the Runway, Inc. trades at $3.6, between stages. That is −28.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 11% of a 52-week range of $3 to $9. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (23 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is between stages. At $3.6 it trades −28.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 11% of its 52-week range ($3–$9).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved −27% while the S&P 500 moved +24% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (23 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-02-27) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Rent the Runway, Inc. trades at 2.4× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 2.4× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Rent the Runway, Inc. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +6.5% | +3.2% | — | — |
| Stock price | −20.3% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
36.2/100 — rank 21 of 25 in Apparel Retail · 58% evidence confidence
Rent the Runway, Inc. scores 36.2 out of 100 against the 25 companies it is compared with in Apparel Retail, ranking 21. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18.6 + 3.1 + 11.5 + 3 = 36.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Rent the Runway, Inc. reported $0.1 B of revenue in the Apr 26 quarter, +28.6% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 13.3% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at $0.3 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.3 B.
FY26 revenue came in at $0.3 B (+6.5% on the year), capping 4 years at 13.3% compound. The latest quarter (Apr 26) printed $0.1 B, +28.6% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +13.4% growth against the decade's 13.3% — the current year is running in line with its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +12.9% over the last 4 quarters against +8.0%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Rent the Runway, Inc.'s operating margin is −22.2% in the Apr 26 quarter, +6.4 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −65.0% to −16.1%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is −22.2%, +6.4 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −65.0%–−16.1%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +6.4 pp year on year while gross margin went +6.4 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Rent the Runway, Inc. posted a net loss of $0.02 B in the Apr 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was $0.0 B. That loss is 22.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.03 B. 10 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Apr 26 profit was $−0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed $0.0 B (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Rent the Runway, Inc.'s cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY26 that was $0.0 B of operating cash against $0.0 B of profit. After $0.1 B of capital spending, $−0.1 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.
FY26: operating cash of $0.0 B against reported profit of $0.0 B, leaving free cash of $−0.1 B after $0.1 B of capital spending.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Rent the Runway, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY26 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Rent the Runway, Inc. earns a ROE of −50% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −300% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −43.4 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 6.1% net margin on 1.50× asset turns.
FY26 ROE is −50%, recovered from a FY22 trough of −300% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 6.1% net margin × 1.50× asset turns × −5.50× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −50.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −35.7% − 7.7% = a −43.4 pp spread. The 7.7% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Dividend
Rent the Runway, Inc. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Rent the Runway, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Rent the Runway, Inc.'s net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from 4.43 in FY22 to −5.00 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Apr 26: total debt of $0.2 B against shareholder equity of $−0.1 B — a debt-to-equity of −4.00. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 4.43 (FY22) to −5.00 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
5.6% of Rent the Runway, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 11.6 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 5.6% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 11.6 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Rent the Runway, Inc.: the Z-score reads −6.40. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of −6.40 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads −6.40.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Victoria's Secret & Co.VSXY | 65.8/100Favorable setup81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 25.3/35 Revenue 8.7% · PAT 39.7% · OPM change 3.4 pp 83% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 4.9% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 28.3× · PEG 1.29 65% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 48.2% · RS bench 56.9% · 1Y 322.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.3 + 9.3 + 11.2 + 20 = 65.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Ross Stores, Inc.ROST | 58.0/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 22.4/35 Revenue 11.8% · PAT 11.2% · OPM change 1.2 pp 83% evidence | 17.0/25 ROCE 7.8% · OPM 13.4% 76% evidence | 5.7/20 P/E 32× · PEG 2.44 65% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector 8.9% · RS bench 16.2% · 1Y 72.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 17 + 5.7 + 12.9 = 58 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 3Citi Trends, Inc.CTRN | 56.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.4/35 Revenue 10.4% · PAT — · OPM change 3 pp 62% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 3.2% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 34× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.2/20 RS sector 37% · RS bench 46% · 1Y 130.2%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 8.9 + 8.9 + 16.2 = 56.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Burlington Stores, Inc.BURL | 55.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 20.1/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT 18.4% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 5.8% 76% evidence | 8.3/20 P/E 32.7× · PEG 1.69 65% evidence | 15.3/20 RS sector 2.3% · RS bench 9.3% · 1Y 35.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 11.8 + 8.3 + 15.3 = 55.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5The Buckle, Inc.BKE | 55.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 23.4/35 Revenue 7.2% · PAT 13.8% · OPM change 4.6 pp 83% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence | 13.2/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG 1.05 65% evidence | 1.5/20 RS sector -27.1% · RS bench -21.8% · 1Y -13.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.4 + 17.1 + 13.2 + 1.5 = 55.2 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -27.1% and the one-year return is -13.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 6Abercrombie & Fitch Co.ANF | 55.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 12.2/35 Revenue 5.2% · PAT -7.4% · OPM change -1.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 8% 76% evidence | 16.0/20 P/E 8.1× · PEG 0.78 65% evidence | 15.1/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench 8.4% · 1Y 6.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 11.9 + 16 + 15.1 = 55.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 8.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7The TJX Companies, Inc.TJX | 54.6/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.8/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT 19.9% · OPM change 1.8 pp 83% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 11.8% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 30.5× · PEG 1.44 65% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -13% · RS bench -6.9% · 1Y 19.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 16.4 + 10.1 + 5.3 = 54.6 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -13% and the one-year return is 19.9%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 8Tilly's, Inc.TLYS | 51.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.3/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT — · OPM change 14.6 pp 62% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE -3.8% · OPM -6.5% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 27.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.9/20 RS sector 32.8% · RS bench 40.9% · 1Y 208%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.3 + 4.5 + 9.7 + 15.9 = 51.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Urban Outfitters, Inc.URBN | 50.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 17.2/35 Revenue 11.2% · PAT 5.4% · OPM change -0.2 pp 83% evidence | 13.5/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 9.4% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 13.5× · PEG 1.5 65% evidence | 9.5/20 RS sector -6.8% · RS bench -0.1% · 1Y 3.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.2 + 13.5 + 10.5 + 9.5 = 50.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Genesco Inc.GCO | 49.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 18.6/35 Revenue 4.6% · PAT — · OPM change 2.7 pp 62% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE -1.4% · OPM -3.2% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 20.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.7/20 RS sector 5.4% · RS bench 12.8% · 1Y 65.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 6.7 + 9.9 + 14.7 = 49.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11The Gap, Inc.GAP | 49.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BASING | 19.9/35 Revenue 1.6% · PAT 9.4% · OPM change 5.2 pp 83% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 12.7% 76% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 9.7× · PEG 0.98 65% evidence | 1.5/20 RS sector -27.3% · RS bench -22.3% · 1Y 4.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 13.7 + 14.2 + 1.5 = 49.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.BOOT | 45.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | BASING | 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.4 pp 39% evidence | 14.7/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 10.6% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 22.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -21.7% · RS bench -16.1% · 1Y -1.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 14.7 + 9.8 + 4.7 = 45.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Caleres, Inc.CAL | 44.4/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | TURNING | 15.3/35 Revenue 5% · PAT -102.5% · OPM change 1.7 pp 83% evidence | 10.1/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 3.6% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 17.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.9/20 RS sector -6.4% · RS bench 0.3% · 1Y 4.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.3 + 10.1 + 10.1 + 8.9 = 44.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.AEO | 44.2/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | TURNING | 24.4/35 Revenue 7.2% · PAT 8.8% · OPM change 10.2 pp 62% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 2.4% 76% evidence | 5.7/20 P/E 10.5× · PEG 3.07 65% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -20.1% · RS bench -14.9% · 1Y 45.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 9.5 + 5.7 + 4.6 = 44.2 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -20.1% and the one-year return is 45.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 15Duluth Holdings Inc.DLTH | 43.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 14.7/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT — · OPM change 2.6 pp 62% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM -9.4% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 95.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.5/20 RS sector 12.7% · RS bench 20.6% · 1Y 83.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.7 + 4.9 + 8.6 + 15.5 = 43.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16lululemon athletica inc.LULU | 43.0/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BASING | 9.2/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT -19.3% · OPM change -7.3 pp 83% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM 11.2% 76% evidence | 14.5/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG 0.95 65% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -37% · RS bench -32.4% · 1Y -35.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.2 + 14.3 + 14.5 + 5 = 43 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 17J.Jill, Inc.JILL | 42.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 7.2/35 Revenue -2.6% · PAT -38.2% · OPM change -6.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 6.1% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 9.1× · PEG 2.02 65% evidence | 14.2/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench 12.1% · 1Y 25.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.2 + 11.8 + 8.8 + 14.2 = 42 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 12.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18Torrid Holdings Inc.CURV | 41.0/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | TURNING | 5.1/35 Revenue -10.2% · PAT -220% · OPM change -2.5 pp 83% evidence | 10.5/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 3.5% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 62.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 39.2% · RS bench 49% · 1Y 25.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5.1 + 10.5 + 8.8 + 16.6 = 41 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 49%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 19Stitch Fix, Inc.SFIX | 39.7/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | TURNING | 17.9/35 Revenue 4.5% · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 62% evidence | 5.4/25 ROCE -1.5% · OPM -1.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -16% · RS bench -9.9% · 1Y -4.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 5.4 + 10 + 6.4 = 39.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Zumiez Inc.ZUMZ | 37.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.9/35 Revenue 4.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2.9 pp 62% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE -3.3% · OPM -7.9% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 29.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -25% · RS bench -19.9% · 1Y 36.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 4.9 + 9.4 + 4.9 = 37.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21Rent the Runway, Inc.this pageRENT | 36.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 18.6/35 Revenue 16.6% · PAT — · OPM change 6.4 pp 62% evidence | 3.1/25 ROCE -12.6% · OPM -21.9% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 0.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -40.3% · RS bench -36.4% · 1Y -15.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 3.1 + 11.5 + 3 = 36.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Shoe Station Group Inc.SHOE | 30.7/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | BASING | 7.7/35 Revenue -4.5% · PAT -43.9% · OPM change -6.5 pp 83% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 13.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -29.6% · RS bench -24.4% · 1Y -20.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.7 + 9 + 10.2 + 3.8 = 30.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Lands' End, Inc.LE | 28.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 7.6/35 Revenue -2% · PAT 100% · OPM change -17.6 pp 62% evidence | 3.7/25 ROCE -7.2% · OPM -18.5% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -23.5% · RS bench -17.9% · 1Y -0.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.6 + 3.7 + 11.4 + 5.3 = 28 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Carter's, Inc.CRI | 57.8/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | TURNING | 22.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 39% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 6.9% · OPM 4.2% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 7.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.4/20 RS sector -3% · RS bench 3.5% · 1Y 56.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.9 + 13.3 + 11.2 + 10.4 = 57.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.AKA | 38.3/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.5/35 Revenue 2.9% · PAT — · OPM change 1.1 pp 40% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE -1.4% · OPM -3.1% 57% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 856× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -9.5% · 1Y -8.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.5 + 7.5 + 8.5 + 6.8 = 38.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Rent the Runway, Inc.'s stock price today?
Rent the Runway, Inc. trades at $3.6, −20.3% over the past year. The company is valued at $0.0 B. The stock sits at 11% of its 52-week range of $3–$9, −28.4% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 23 weeks. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Rent the Runway, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?
Rent the Runway, Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B and a net loss of $0.0 B for the Apr 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $−0.57. The operating margin was −22.2%, 6.4 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Rent the Runway, Inc.'s revenue?
Rent the Runway, Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B in the Apr 26 quarter, +28.6% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was $0.3 B (+6.5%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 13.3% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Rent the Runway, Inc.'s profit?
Rent the Runway, Inc. earned $−0.0 B of net profit in the Apr 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was $0.0 B. The operating margin ran −22.2% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Rent the Runway, Inc.'s market cap?
Rent the Runway, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $0.0 B at a stock price of $3.6. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Rent the Runway, Inc. pay a dividend?
No — Rent the Runway, Inc. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Rent the Runway, Inc. performing?
Rent the Runway, Inc.'s latest readings are below. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 23 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Rent the Runway, Inc. beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Rent the Runway, Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (23 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-02-27), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved −27% against the S&P 500's +24% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Rent the Runway, Inc.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Rent the Runway, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $3.6. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Rent the Runway, Inc.?
Somewhat — short interest is 5.6% of Rent the Runway, Inc.'s tradable float, about 11.6 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Rent the Runway, Inc.'s capex?
Rent the Runway, Inc. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was $0.1 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Rent the Runway, Inc.'s cash flow?
Rent the Runway, Inc. generated $0.0 B of operating cash flow in FY26 and $−0.1 B of free cash flow after $0.1 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.0 B, so operating cash ran behind profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Rent the Runway, Inc.?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads −6.40 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Rent the Runway, Inc. in its business cycle?
Rent the Runway, Inc.'s FY26 operating margin was −18.2%, against a 5-year band of −65.0%–−16.1%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran −22.2%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Rent the Runway, Inc. story?
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Rent the Runway, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Rent the Runway, Inc.'s balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.