American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
$1.8B
$1.8B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$1.7B
$1.8B
$2.2B
$2.1B
$1.9B
$1.9B
$2.4B
$2.1B
$1.9B
$1.9B
$2.3B
$2.1B
$1.9B
—
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Insurance - Property & Casualty Stocks
Insurance - Property & Casualty: The Progressive Corporation owns the largest revenue base; White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. has the fastest current growth.
01 · the industry itself · before any single company
How has Insurance - Property & Casualty moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 15% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 34% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 13 weeks running.
BREAKING OUT · ahead 13w✓Price and the fundamentals both up27 of 44 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months4 are 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
RS ↑13w · 34/44 >200d (−2) · 27/44 lead (+1) · EPS 39/44↑
Insurance - Property & Casualty, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Insurance - Property & Casualty, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Insurance - Property & Casualty, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 44 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Insurance - Property & Casualty outperforming S&P 500?
Insurance - Property & Casualty has underperformed S&P 500 by 0.2% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 10.5%. 13 of 30 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Porch Group, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +28.3%.
+10.5%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-0.2%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
13/30Stocks leading S&P 500
11/30Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Insurance - Property & Casualty has underperformed S&P 500 by 0.2% over 52 weeks and 10.5% over 13 weeks. 13 of 30 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 11 of 30 beat the sector itself. The Progressive Corporation leads with income of $91,055 million, based on 21 of 30 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Companies
30
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$615.9B
Chubb Limited
Revenue growing
20/21
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
13/30
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 30
03 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 60.2% evidence confidence.
W. R. Berkley Corporation looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Hagerty, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. Financial companies use P/BV÷ROE and asset quality; PEG, industrial OPM and ROCE are excluded. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.SLDE | 73.5/100Favorable setup60% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.7/35 Income — · PAT — 26% evidence | 19.8/25 ROA 4.2% · ROE 13.1% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 13.3/20 P/BV 1.87× · P/BV÷ROE 0.14 70% evidence | 19.7/20 RS sector 27% · RS bench 30.6% · 1Y 74.4%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 19.8 + 13.3 + 19.7 = 73.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2The Allstate CorporationALL | 69.8/100Favorable setup80% evidence | LEADER | 24.8/35 Income 5.9% · PAT 100% 81% evidence | 17.3/25 ROA 2.8% · ROE 11.3% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 12.7/20 P/BV 1.79× · P/BV÷ROE 0.16 70% evidence | 15.0/20 RS sector 5.7% · RS bench 8.7% · 1Y 23.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.8 + 17.3 + 12.7 + 15 = 69.8 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 3The Travelers Companies, Inc.TRV | 61.2/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.1/35 Income 2.4% · PAT 58.3% 81% evidence | 14.8/25 ROA 1.6% · ROE 7% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 7.5/20 P/BV 2.08× · P/BV÷ROE 0.3 70% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 11.8% · RS bench 15% · 1Y 36.8%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 14.8 + 7.5 + 17.8 = 61.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4HCI Group, Inc.HCI | 59.2/100Mixed-positive evidence62% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.9/35 Income 22.1% · PAT 100% 55% evidence | 13.6/25 ROA — · ROE 9.9% · GNPA — 34% evidence | 11.5/20 P/BV 1.83× · P/BV÷ROE 0.18 70% evidence | 11.2/20 RS sector -2.2% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y 2.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.9 + 13.6 + 11.5 + 11.2 = 59.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5United Fire Group, Inc.UFCS | 57.4/100Mixed-positive evidence70% evidence | LEADER | 23.8/35 Income 10.6% · PAT 97% 71% evidence | 9.3/25 ROA 0.9% · ROE 3.4% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 7.9/20 P/BV 1× · P/BV÷ROE 0.29 70% evidence | 16.4/20 RS sector 20.2% · RS bench 23.8% · 1Y 75.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.8 + 9.3 + 7.9 + 16.4 = 57.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Cincinnati Financial CorporationCINF | 57.0/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | ASLEEP | 29.1/35 Income 19.6% · PAT 82.8% 81% evidence | 14.9/25 ROA 2.1% · ROE 6.9% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 8.6/20 P/BV 1.72× · P/BV÷ROE 0.25 70% evidence | 4.4/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench -3.8% · 1Y 9.4%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.1 + 14.9 + 8.6 + 4.4 = 57 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -6.5% and the one-year return is 9.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 7Mercury General CorporationMCY | 55.1/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.4/35 Income 9.7% · PAT 100% 45% evidence | 15.1/25 ROA 2.1% · ROE 8.6% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 9.8/20 P/BV 1.89× · P/BV÷ROE 0.22 70% evidence | 7.8/20 RS sector -1.9% · RS bench 1% · 1Y 28.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 15.1 + 9.8 + 7.8 = 55.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.THG | 54.3/100Mixed-positive evidence60% evidence | LEADER | 18.1/35 Income — · PAT — 26% evidence | 13.5/25 ROA 1.6% · ROE 5.6% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 5.9/20 P/BV 2.03× · P/BV÷ROE 0.36 70% evidence | 16.8/20 RS sector 10.8% · RS bench 13.9% · 1Y 32.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 13.5 + 5.9 + 16.8 = 54.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.SKWD | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | LEADER | 20.4/35 Income 28.9% · PAT 43.5% 71% evidence | 11.6/25 ROA 1.1% · ROE 4.8% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 6.6/20 P/BV 1.59× · P/BV÷ROE 0.33 70% evidence | 15.0/20 RS sector 5.1% · RS bench 7.9% · 1Y 20.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 11.6 + 6.6 + 15 = 53.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Palomar Holdings, Inc.PLMR | 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence62% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.0/35 Income 60.4% · PAT 47% 55% evidence | 11.8/25 ROA — · ROE 4.9% · GNPA — 34% evidence | 3.3/20 P/BV 3.3× · P/BV÷ROE 0.67 70% evidence | 15.9/20 RS sector 2.9% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 21.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22 + 11.8 + 3.3 + 15.9 = 53 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Assurant, Inc.AIZ | 52.7/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | LEADER | 22.6/35 Income 9% · PAT 49% 71% evidence | 10.8/25 ROA 0.8% · ROE 4.9% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 5.7/20 P/BV 1.84× · P/BV÷ROE 0.38 70% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector 6.5% · RS bench 9.6% · 1Y 35.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.6 + 10.8 + 5.7 + 13.6 = 52.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12RLI Corp.RLI | 52.6/100Mixed-positive evidence60% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.0/35 Income — · PAT — 26% evidence | 17.1/25 ROA 2.7% · ROE 9.6% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 6.5/20 P/BV 3.09× · P/BV÷ROE 0.32 70% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -7.9% · RS bench -5.5% · 1Y -6.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 17.1 + 6.5 + 8 = 52.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 13W. R. Berkley CorporationWRB | 51.6/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | TURNING | 12.8/35 Income 4.3% · PAT 9.5% 81% evidence | 20.8/25 ROA 3.6% · ROE 21.2% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 13.5/20 P/BV 2.79× · P/BV÷ROE 0.13 70% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -9.4% · RS bench -6.9% · 1Y -4.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 20.8 + 13.5 + 4.5 = 51.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 14Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.KNSL | 48.6/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.0/35 Income — · PAT — 26% evidence | 18.0/25 ROA 3% · ROE 9.4% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 4.9/20 P/BV 3.69× · P/BV÷ROE 0.39 70% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -11.3% · RS bench -9% · 1Y -15.9%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 18 + 4.9 + 6.7 = 48.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 15Markel Group Inc.MKL | 45.7/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | BASING | 20.8/35 Income — · PAT — 26% evidence | 14.6/25 ROA 1.8% · ROE 6.3% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 8.6/20 P/BV 1.28× · P/BV÷ROE 0.2 70% evidence | 1.7/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -14.5% · 1Y -7.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.8 + 14.6 + 8.6 + 1.7 = 45.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Hagerty, Inc.HGTY | 44.9/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.5/35 Income 15.4% · PAT 12.4% 71% evidence | 4.9/25 ROA -0.6% · ROE -2.2% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 9.1/20 P/BV 4.87× · P/BV÷ROE — 10% evidence | 17.4/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench 8.8% · 1Y 9.3%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 4.9 + 9.1 + 17.4 = 44.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 8.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 17The Progressive CorporationPGR | 43.5/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | FADING | 13.1/35 Income 10.5% · PAT 12.1% 81% evidence | 17.9/25 ROA 2.8% · ROE 9.9% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 5.2/20 P/BV 3.7× · P/BV÷ROE 0.37 70% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -7.6% · RS bench -5% · 1Y -10.5%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 17.9 + 5.2 + 7.3 = 43.5 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 18Old Republic International CorporationORI | 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.5/35 Income — · PAT — 26% evidence | 11.8/25 ROA 1.1% · ROE 5.3% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 7.3/20 P/BV 1.64× · P/BV÷ROE 0.31 70% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -10.5% · RS bench -8% · 1Y 2.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 11.8 + 7.3 + 3.5 = 43.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Safety Insurance Group, Inc.SAFT | 41.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 10.1/35 Income 10.8% · PAT -13.7% 71% evidence | 5.8/25 ROA -0.6% · ROE -1.7% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 9.8/20 P/BV 1.25× · P/BV÷ROE — 10% evidence | 16.1/20 RS sector 19.2% · RS bench 22.4% · 1Y 44.6%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.1 + 5.8 + 9.8 + 16.1 = 41.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.WTM | 39.9/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | TURNING | 21.5/35 Income 69.3% · PAT 100% 71% evidence | 5.8/25 ROA 0% · ROE -0.5% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 9.8/20 P/BV 1.01× · P/BV÷ROE — 10% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench -7.5% · 1Y 16.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 5.8 + 9.8 + 2.8 = 39.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Selective Insurance Group, Inc.SIGI | 39.5/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.1/35 Income 7% · PAT 29.4% 81% evidence | 10.5/25 ROA 0.9% · ROE 3.7% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 5.1/20 P/BV 1.58× · P/BV÷ROE 0.43 70% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -5.4% · RS bench -2.7% · 1Y 14.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 10.5 + 5.1 + 4.8 = 39.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22Chubb LimitedCB | 38.8/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.6/35 Income 8% · PAT 21.5% 81% evidence | 11.7/25 ROA 1.1% · ROE 3.7% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 4.6/20 P/BV 1.74× · P/BV÷ROE 0.47 70% evidence | 7.9/20 RS sector -2.8% · RS bench 0% · 1Y 24.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 11.7 + 4.6 + 7.9 = 38.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Horace Mann Educators CorporationHMN | 37.1/100Mixed-negative evidence76% evidence | FADING | 17.5/35 Income 5.5% · PAT 43.9% 71% evidence | 7.5/25 ROA 0.3% · ROE 2.9% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 5.3/20 P/BV 1.17× · P/BV÷ROE 0.4 70% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -3.2% · RS bench -0.4% · 1Y 7.7%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 7.5 + 5.3 + 6.8 = 37.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Stewart Information Services CorporationSTC | 36.9/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.5/35 Income — · PAT — 26% evidence | 12.5/25 ROA 1.6% · ROE 2.7% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 4.8/20 P/BV 1.21× · P/BV÷ROE 0.45 70% evidence | 2.1/20 RS sector -13.1% · RS bench -10.7% · 1Y -12.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 12.5 + 4.8 + 2.1 = 36.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25American Financial Group, Inc.AFG | 33.8/100Adverse evidence76% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.0/35 Income -1.2% · PAT 10% 71% evidence | 9.8/25 ROA 0.6% · ROE 4.2% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 4.1/20 P/BV 2.27× · P/BV÷ROE 0.54 70% evidence | 7.9/20 RS sector -4.2% · RS bench -1.5% · 1Y 1.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 9.8 + 4.1 + 7.9 = 33.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26CNA Financial CorporationCNA | 32.7/100Adverse evidence76% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.4/35 Income 4% · PAT 35.8% 71% evidence | 7.7/25 ROA 0.3% · ROE 2% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 4.2/20 P/BV 1.14× · P/BV÷ROE 0.57 70% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -7.5% · RS bench -4.9% · 1Y 5.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 7.7 + 4.2 + 6.4 = 32.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Loews CorporationL | 29.8/100Adverse evidence76% evidence | TURNING | 14.8/35 Income 4.2% · PAT 23.8% 71% evidence | 7.8/25 ROA 0.5% · ROE 1.9% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 4.0/20 P/BV 1.17× · P/BV÷ROE 0.62 70% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -8% · RS bench -5.3% · 1Y 12.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 7.8 + 4 + 3.2 = 29.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Kemper CorporationKMPR | 25.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 6.2/35 Income 0.3% · PAT -90.6% 71% evidence | 5.7/25 ROA 0% · ROE -0.2% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 9.8/20 P/BV 0.68× · P/BV÷ROE — 10% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -27.3% · RS bench -25.4% · 1Y -47.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.2 + 5.7 + 9.8 + 3.3 = 25 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Porch Group, Inc.PRCH | 47.5/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.2/35 Income — · PAT — 26% evidence | 4.6/25 ROA -0.5% · ROE -164.7% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 9.8/20 P/BV -143.74× · P/BV÷ROE — 10% evidence | 19.9/20 RS sector 28.3% · RS bench 31.6% · 1Y -15.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.2 + 4.6 + 9.8 + 19.9 = 47.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Lemonade, Inc.LMND | 30.5/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.4/35 Income — · PAT — 26% evidence | 4.1/25 ROA -2.2% · ROE -8.5% · GNPA — 68% evidence | 9.0/20 P/BV 10× · P/BV÷ROE — 10% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -29.6% · RS bench -27.7% · 1Y -20.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 4.1 + 9 + 0 = 30.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Showing 10 of 30 companies
04 · what price has already done
Market action
United Fire Group, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Insurance - Property & Casualty at +75.2%. Porch Group, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +31.6%. 13 of 30 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-09-16.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Insurance - Property & Casualty itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Income Scale & Growth Durability
The Progressive Corporation has the highest Income among the 30 Insurance - Property & Casualty companies compared here, at $91,055 million. The Allstate Corporation is next at $70,137 million. White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. has the highest Income growth at 69.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Income series carries 20 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: The Progressive Corporation is the scale leader at $91,055 million, 29.8% ahead of The Allstate Corporation. White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.'s growth is 69.3% from a $3,675 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderThe Progressive Corporation · $91,055 million
Gap29.8% versus #2 · The Allstate Corporation
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/30 companies · 571 observations
Investor read: The Progressive Corporation is the scale benchmark; White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: The Progressive Corporation's growth falls below White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
For lenders, reported income is used instead of industrial-company sales. Growth is compared year-on-year.
Incomelargest
Income growthfastest growers
Income · company comparison
21/30 level · 21/30 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Income · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
$2.6B
$2.6B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.7B
$2.6B
$2.7B
$2.8B
$3.0B
$2.9B
$2.9B
$3.0B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.2B
$3.2B
$3.4B
$3.4B
—
Chubb Limited · CB
$10.8B
$10.5B
$9.6B
$9.9B
$12.1B
$11.4B
$11.1B
$11.8B
$13.9B
$13.0B
$12.9B
$13.8B
$14.8B
$14.2B
$13.4B
$14.8B
$16.1B
$15.1B
$14.8B
$15.8B
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
$1.8B
$3.3B
$1.2B
$820M
$1.4B
$3.1B
$2.2B
$2.6B
$1.8B
$3.4B
$2.9B
$2.5B
$3.3B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$3.2B
$3.7B
$3.1B
$2.9B
$4.3B
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
$3.0B
$3.1B
$2.9B
$2.9B
$3.0B
$3.1B
$3.2B
$3.3B
$3.3B
$3.5B
$3.4B
$3.5B
$3.6B
$3.7B
$3.6B
$3.7B
$3.8B
$3.8B
$3.7B
—
Loews Corporation · L
$3.4B
$3.7B
$3.4B
$3.4B
$3.5B
$3.8B
$3.8B
$3.9B
$3.9B
$4.3B
$4.2B
$4.3B
$4.5B
$4.5B
$4.5B
$4.6B
$4.7B
$4.7B
$4.6B
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
$2.7B
$3.8B
$2.6B
$1.8B
$3.1B
$4.2B
$3.6B
$4.1B
$3.4B
$4.6B
$4.5B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.5B
$4.6B
$3.9B
$4.0B
$3.6B
—
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
$2.0B
$2.7B
$2.2B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$2.3B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$2.3B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.2B
$2.4B
$2.4B
$2.4B
—
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
$12.5B
$13.0B
$12.3B
$12.2B
$13.2B
$13.6B
$13.8B
$14.0B
$14.5B
$14.8B
$15.3B
$15.7B
$16.6B
$16.5B
$16.5B
$16.6B
$17.3B
$17.3B
$16.9B
$18.6B
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
$11.9B
$12.5B
$11.8B
$11.5B
$12.8B
$13.5B
$14.3B
$15.4B
$15.6B
$16.9B
$17.2B
$18.1B
$19.7B
$20.3B
$20.4B
$22.0B
$22.5B
$22.7B
$22.2B
$23.6B
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
$8.8B
$9.0B
$8.8B
$9.1B
$9.3B
$9.6B
$9.7B
$10.1B
$10.6B
$10.9B
$11.2B
$11.3B
$11.9B
$12.0B
$11.8B
$12.1B
$12.5B
$12.4B
$11.9B
$12.2B
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
$2.4B
$2.6B
$2.9B
$2.5B
$2.7B
$3.0B
$2.9B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.2B
$3.3B
$3.3B
$3.4B
$3.7B
$3.5B
$3.7B
$3.8B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.7B
Income growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
—
—
—
0.5%
13%
9.7%
9.6%
20%
9.1%
8.0%
9.5%
3.3%
9.5%
3.2%
-2.6%
1.3%
-1.6%
-4.0%
-0.1%
—
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
—
—
—
-1.3%
-3.4%
3.0%
6.4%
8.8%
8.9%
12%
9.0%
7.1%
7.0%
4.1%
6.7%
8.0%
8.9%
7.9%
11%
—
Chubb Limited · CB
—
—
—
2.5%
12%
9.2%
15%
20%
14%
14%
17%
17%
7.2%
9.1%
3.6%
7.2%
8.8%
6.3%
11%
6.6%
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
—
—
—
-64%
-21%
-6.3%
84%
218%
28%
7.7%
31%
-2.3%
83%
-24%
-13%
28%
12%
22%
12%
32%
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
—
—
—
-3.4%
-0.1%
1.9%
9.3%
13%
13%
13%
9.3%
6.5%
8.5%
5.2%
5.3%
5.6%
5.5%
3.8%
1.4%
—
Loews Corporation · L
—
—
—
-15%
2.7%
3.6%
11%
16%
13%
12%
12%
8.5%
14%
6.8%
6.2%
6.8%
4.6%
4.1%
1.4%
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
—
—
—
-49%
14%
12%
40%
131%
10%
10%
23%
-11%
9.5%
-20%
-21%
24%
6.5%
7.6%
0.1%
—
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
—
—
—
-20%
-14%
-14%
-20%
-0.7%
2.3%
-17%
15%
4.1%
33%
3.1%
4.9%
18%
3.5%
19%
13%
—
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
—
—
—
-3.4%
5.8%
4.8%
12%
14%
9.8%
8.7%
11%
12%
15%
11%
7.8%
5.9%
3.8%
5.1%
3.0%
12%
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
—
—
—
-3.3%
7.8%
7.8%
21%
33%
22%
25%
21%
18%
27%
20%
18%
21%
14%
12%
8.7%
7.3%
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
—
—
—
5.2%
5.7%
6.9%
10%
11%
14%
13%
16%
12%
12%
9.9%
5.2%
7.4%
4.8%
3.5%
1.0%
0.3%
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
—
—
—
9.5%
12%
17%
-0.7%
19%
11%
6.9%
13%
11%
12%
14%
8.9%
11%
11%
1.4%
4.0%
1.2%
06 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
The Allstate Corporation has the highest Net profit among the 30 Insurance - Property & Casualty companies compared here, at $13,300 million. The Progressive Corporation is next at $11,695 million. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 21 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: The Allstate Corporation leads with $13,300 million of TTM profit, 13.7% above The Progressive Corporation. The Allstate Corporation shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (131.3% uncapped) growth from a $13,300 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderThe Allstate Corporation · $13,300 million
Gap13.7% versus #2 · The Progressive Corporation
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/30 companies · 571 observations
Investor read: The Allstate Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is ranked only where the comparison base is economically meaningful. Loss-to-profit flips are shown but do not win the growth table.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
21/30 level · 20/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
$219M
$355M
$290M
$167M
$165M
$276M
$212M
$200M
$177M
$263M
$242M
$209M
$181M
$255M
$154M
$174M
$215M
$299M
$191M
—
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
$880M
$121M
$149M
$52M
$7M
$68M
$114M
$156M
$190M
$183M
$236M
$189M
$134M
$201M
$147M
$235M
$266M
$225M
$274M
—
Chubb Limited · CB
$1.8B
$2.1B
$2.0B
$1.2B
$792M
$1.3B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$2.0B
$3.3B
$2.3B
$2.2B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$1.3B
$3.0B
$3.1B
$3.2B
$2.3B
$2.9B
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
$153M
$1.5B
$-266M
$-818M
$-416M
$1.0B
$225M
$534M
$-99M
$1.2B
$755M
$312M
$820M
$405M
$-90M
$685M
$1.1B
$676M
$274M
$1.3B
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
$256M
$248M
$295M
$190M
$-42M
$239M
$297M
$283M
$258M
$367M
$338M
$317M
$283M
$21M
$274M
$299M
$403M
$302M
$211M
—
Loews Corporation · L
$246M
$353M
$352M
$187M
$-27M
$379M
$404M
$388M
$276M
$477M
$485M
$395M
$425M
$189M
$392M
$416M
$536M
$428M
$354M
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
$190M
$873M
$-49M
$-883M
$117M
$712M
$538M
$716M
$53M
$794M
$1.0B
$290M
$947M
$561M
$129M
$677M
$764M
$582M
$-204M
—
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
$89M
$627M
$306M
$-40M
$-92M
$512M
$200M
$156M
$53M
$191M
$317M
$92M
$339M
$105M
$246M
$208M
$280M
$207M
$330M
—
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
$531M
$806M
$650M
$-1.0B
$-674M
$-296M
$-321M
$-1.4B
$-4M
$1.5B
$1.2B
$347M
$1.2B
$1.9B
$596M
$2.1B
$3.7B
$3.8B
$2.5B
$3.3B
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
$119M
$962M
$314M
$-543M
$124M
$827M
$448M
$345M
$1.1B
$2.0B
$2.3B
$1.5B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.6B
$3.2B
$2.6B
$3.0B
$2.8B
$3.3B
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
$662M
$1.3B
$1.0B
$551M
$454M
$819M
$975M
$-14M
$404M
$1.6B
$1.1B
$534M
$1.3B
$2.1B
$395M
$1.5B
$1.9B
$2.5B
$1.7B
$2.2B
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
$261M
$294M
$591M
$179M
$229M
$382M
$294M
$356M
$334M
$397M
$442M
$372M
$366M
$576M
$418M
$401M
$511M
$450M
$515M
$452M
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
—
—
—
-30%
-25%
-22%
-27%
20%
7.3%
-4.7%
14%
4.5%
2.3%
-3.0%
-36%
-17%
19%
17%
24%
—
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
—
—
—
-75%
-99%
-44%
-23%
200%
2,614%
169%
107%
21%
-29%
9.8%
-38%
24%
99%
12%
86%
—
Chubb Limited · CB
—
—
—
-47%
-57%
-39%
-3.1%
51%
158%
151%
21%
24%
22%
-20%
-41%
35%
25%
20%
75%
-3.9%
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
—
—
—
-216%
-372%
-31%
—
—
—
17%
236%
-42%
—
-66%
-112%
120%
37%
67%
—
83%
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
—
—
—
-48%
-116%
-3.6%
0.7%
49%
—
54%
14%
12%
9.7%
-94%
-19%
-5.7%
42%
1,338%
-23%
—
Loews Corporation · L
—
—
—
-76%
-111%
7.4%
15%
107%
—
26%
20%
1.8%
54%
-60%
-19%
5.3%
26%
126%
-9.7%
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
—
—
—
-210%
-38%
-18%
—
—
-55%
12%
95%
-60%
1,687%
-29%
-88%
133%
-19%
3.7%
-258%
—
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
—
—
—
-113%
-203%
-18%
-35%
—
—
-63%
59%
-41%
540%
-45%
-22%
126%
-17%
97%
34%
—
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
—
—
—
-163%
-227%
-137%
-149%
—
—
—
—
—
—
27%
-50%
505%
222%
102%
312%
56%
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
—
—
—
-169%
4.2%
-14%
43%
—
804%
140%
420%
323%
108%
19%
10%
118%
12%
25%
9.8%
4.3%
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
—
—
—
-41%
-31%
-39%
-4.2%
-103%
-11%
99%
15%
—
212%
28%
-65%
183%
50%
20%
333%
46%
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
—
—
—
-25%
-12%
30%
-50%
99%
46%
3.9%
50%
4.5%
9.6%
45%
-5.4%
7.8%
40%
-22%
23%
13%
07 · compare level, then change
Funding Base & Its Composition
No company in this Insurance - Property & Casualty comparison reports a funding base figure this section can compare, so the Deposits rank is empty. On Borrowings, Loews Corporation is highest at $8,934 million, across 11 of 30 companies with a usable reading.
What the numbers say: There is not enough comparable evidence to name a reliable deposits leader.
LeaderNo comparable leader
GapNot enough peers
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage0/30 companies · 0 observations
Investor read: The current leader sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current borrowings signal.
For banks, debt is operating funding rather than industrial leverage. Deposits and borrowings are therefore shown as funding-base levels; asset quality, funding cost and liquidity determine whether that funding is attractive.
Depositslargest deposit bases
—Not enough comparable data—
Borrowingslargest borrowings
Funding base · company comparison
0/30 level · 11/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Deposits | Borrowings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| W. R. Berkley Corporation WRB | — | $3.1B | Jun 2026 |
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation CINF | — | $876M | Jun 2026 |
| Loews Corporation L | — | $8.9B | Mar 2026 |
| Mercury General Corporation MCY | — | $13M | Mar 2026 |
| Hagerty, Inc. HGTY | — | $0M | Mar 2026 |
| Palomar Holdings, Inc. PLMR | — | $297M | Mar 2026 |
| Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. SLDE | — | $9M | Jun 2026 |
| HCI Group, Inc. HCI | — | $32M | Mar 2026 |
| Stewart Information Services Corporation STC | — | $124M | Jun 2026 |
| Porch Group, Inc. PRCH | — | $397M | Jun 2026 |
| Safety Insurance Group, Inc. SAFT | — | $11M | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
No consistent historical series is available for deposits.
Borrowings · reported quarter history
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
$904M
$897M
$890M
$885M
$887M
$891M
$895M
$867M
$869M
$874M
$873M
$874M
$874M
$875M
$878M
$884M
$883M
$886M
$884M
$876M
Hagerty, Inc. · HGTY
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$81M
$79M
$77M
$52M
$50M
$49M
$47M
$45M
$0M
$42M
$41M
$41M
$0M
$0M
—
HCI Group, Inc. · HCI
$78M
$46M
$45M
$212M
$212M
$212M
$196M
$208M
$208M
$208M
$185M
$185M
$185M
$185M
$185M
$16M
$32M
$32M
$32M
—
Loews Corporation · L
$9.1B
$9.1B
$9.3B
$9.3B
$9.3B
$9.0B
$9.1B
$9.1B
$9.2B
$1.1B
$10.1B
$8.6B
$9.5B
$8.9B
$8.9B
$8.9B
$9.4B
$9.5B
$8.9B
—
Mercury General Corporation · MCY
$37M
$35M
$32M
$166M
$26M
$22M
$19M
$20M
$19M
$14M
$14M
$14M
$14M
$14M
$18M
$16M
$14M
$12M
$13M
—
Palomar Holdings, Inc. · PLMR
$0M
$0M
$15M
$23M
$26M
$36M
$71M
$71M
$53M
$53M
$43M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$297M
—
Porch Group, Inc. · PRCH
$418M
$417M
$417M
$420M
$434M
$442M
$438M
$435M
$435M
$436M
$432M
$437M
$399M
$404M
$409M
$394M
$387M
$385M
$391M
$397M
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. · SAFT
$27M
$27M
$27M
$25M
$24M
$23M
$22M
$22M
$21M
$20M
$19M
$18M
$17M
$16M
$15M
$14M
$13M
$12M
$11M
—
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. · SLDE
—
—
—
—
$8M
$8M
—
—
$7M
$7M
$7M
$7M
$7M
$9M
$9M
$8M
$10M
$10M
$9M
$9M
Stewart Information Services Corporation · STC
$129M
$149M
$155M
$150M
$146M
$148M
$148M
$147M
$142M
$136M
$133M
$127M
$123M
$119M
$114M
$130M
$125M
$122M
$124M
$124M
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
$3.5B
$3.5B
$3.1B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.1B
08 · compare level, then change
Return On Assets
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. has the highest ROA among the 30 Insurance - Property & Casualty companies compared here, at 4.2%. W. R. Berkley Corporation is next at 3.6%. Mercury General Corporation has the highest ROA change at +3.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its ROA series carries 14 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. leads roa at 4.2%; Mercury General Corporation leads roa change at +3.4 percentage points.
LeaderSlide Insurance Holdings, Inc. · 4.2%
Gap16.7% versus #2 · W. R. Berkley Corporation
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage28/30 companies · 540 observations
Investor read: Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roa change signal.
ROA is the cleanest first comparison for lenders because the balance sheet is the operating asset.
ROAhighest
ROA changefastest improvers
Return on assets · company comparison
28/30 level · 28/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROA · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
0.4%
0.7%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
1.0%
0.7%
0.7%
0.6%
0.9%
0.8%
0.7%
0.6%
0.8%
0.5%
0.6%
0.6%
0.9%
0.6%
—
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
0.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.2%
0.1%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
0.6%
0.8%
0.6%
0.5%
0.6%
0.5%
0.7%
0.8%
0.7%
0.8%
—
Chubb Limited · CB
0.7%
0.8%
1.1%
0.7%
0.5%
0.8%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.4%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
0.8%
0.6%
1.3%
1.3%
0.9%
0.9%
1.1%
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
—
1.7%
15%
-2.7%
-8.7%
-4.9%
11%
2.3%
5.5%
-1.1%
12%
7.3%
2.9%
7.3%
3.3%
-0.8%
5.7%
9.0%
5.2%
2.1%
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
0.4%
0.4%
0.5%
0.3%
0.0%
0.4%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.6%
0.6%
0.5%
0.5%
0.1%
0.5%
0.5%
0.6%
0.5%
0.3%
—
Loews Corporation · L
0.4%
0.5%
0.5%
0.3%
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.4%
0.7%
0.7%
0.6%
0.6%
0.4%
0.6%
0.6%
0.7%
0.6%
0.5%
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
0.4%
2.0%
-0.1%
-2.0%
0.1%
1.7%
1.2%
1.5%
0.1%
1.7%
1.9%
0.6%
1.9%
0.8%
0.4%
1.4%
1.2%
1.0%
-0.3%
1.8%
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
0.4%
2.6%
1.3%
-0.2%
-0.4%
2.0%
0.8%
0.6%
0.2%
0.7%
1.2%
0.3%
1.2%
0.4%
0.9%
0.7%
0.9%
0.7%
1.1%
1.1%
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
0.2%
1.1%
0.6%
-0.8%
-0.5%
-0.2%
-0.3%
-1.3%
0.0%
1.6%
1.2%
0.4%
1.2%
1.8%
0.6%
1.3%
2.8%
3.4%
2.1%
2.8%
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
0.2%
1.5%
0.5%
-0.7%
0.2%
1.2%
0.6%
0.5%
1.5%
2.5%
2.7%
1.7%
2.5%
2.5%
2.6%
3.0%
2.4%
2.6%
2.5%
2.8%
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
0.6%
1.2%
0.9%
0.5%
0.5%
0.8%
0.9%
0.0%
0.4%
1.4%
1.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.7%
0.4%
1.2%
1.4%
1.9%
1.3%
1.6%
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
—
2.9%
3.0%
5.9%
1.7%
2.1%
4.1%
3.1%
3.6%
3.0%
3.9%
3.9%
3.3%
3.3%
4.4%
3.6%
3.6%
3.9%
3.5%
3.6%
ROA change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
—
—
—
—
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
—
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
—
—
—
—
−0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
0.0 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
—
Chubb Limited · CB
—
—
—
—
−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.2 pp
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
—
—
—
—
—
−6.6 pp
−4.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+14.2 pp
+3.8 pp
+0.6 pp
+5.0 pp
−2.6 pp
+8.4 pp
−8.5 pp
−8.1 pp
+2.8 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.9 pp
+2.9 pp
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
—
—
—
—
−0.4 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
—
Loews Corporation · L
—
—
—
—
−0.4 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
—
—
—
—
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.3 pp
+3.5 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.9 pp
+1.8 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.5 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.4 pp
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
—
—
—
—
−0.8 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.6 pp
−1.3 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
—
—
—
—
−0.7 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.5 pp
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
—
—
—
—
0.0 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.3 pp
+1.3 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
—
—
—
—
−0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
0.0 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.4 pp
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
—
—
—
—
—
−0.8 pp
+1.1 pp
−2.8 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.9 pp
0.0 pp
09 · compare level, then change
ROE — Leaders & Improvers
W. R. Berkley Corporation has the highest ROE among the 30 Insurance - Property & Casualty companies compared here, at 21.2%. Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. is next at 13.1%. Mercury General Corporation has the highest ROE change at +14.9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its ROE series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: W. R. Berkley Corporation leads roe at 21.2%; Mercury General Corporation leads roe change at +14.9 percentage points.
LeaderW. R. Berkley Corporation · 21.2%
Gap61.8% versus #2 · Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 578 observations
Investor read: W. R. Berkley Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roe change signal.
ROE shows the return to shareholders, but should be read with asset quality and leverage.
ROEhighest
ROE changefastest improvers
Return on equity · company comparison
30/30 level · 30/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROE · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
3.8%
6.0%
5.0%
3.5%
3.6%
6.1%
4.8%
5.0%
4.5%
6.3%
5.9%
5.0%
4.2%
5.8%
3.6%
3.9%
4.6%
6.4%
4.2%
—
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
15%
2.1%
2.7%
1.0%
0.1%
1.4%
2.4%
3.5%
4.4%
4.0%
5.1%
4.0%
2.7%
4.1%
2.9%
4.5%
4.8%
4.1%
4.9%
—
Chubb Limited · CB
3.2%
3.6%
3.4%
2.1%
1.5%
2.4%
3.4%
3.4%
3.9%
5.8%
3.9%
3.8%
3.9%
4.0%
2.0%
4.3%
4.2%
4.3%
3.1%
3.7%
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
—
5.2%
47%
-8.4%
-29%
-17%
41%
8.4%
20%
-3.7%
42%
24%
9.8%
25%
12%
-2.6%
20%
30%
17%
6.9%
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
2.1%
1.9%
2.6%
1.7%
-0.4%
2.2%
3.0%
3.1%
3.1%
4.0%
3.7%
3.4%
2.9%
0.2%
2.7%
2.9%
3.7%
2.7%
2.0%
—
Loews Corporation · L
1.3%
1.8%
1.9%
1.1%
-0.2%
2.2%
2.4%
2.4%
1.9%
3.0%
3.0%
2.4%
2.5%
1.1%
2.2%
2.3%
2.9%
2.3%
1.9%
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
1.4%
6.2%
-0.3%
-6.4%
0.9%
4.9%
3.7%
5.1%
0.4%
5.4%
6.9%
1.9%
5.9%
3.4%
0.8%
3.9%
4.2%
3.2%
-1.1%
6.3%
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
1.4%
9.6%
4.6%
-0.6%
-1.5%
7.8%
3.1%
2.5%
0.9%
3.0%
5.0%
1.5%
5.5%
1.7%
4.0%
3.4%
4.3%
3.6%
5.6%
5.3%
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
2.0%
2.9%
2.6%
-4.2%
-3.0%
-1.4%
-1.6%
-7.8%
0.0%
8.5%
6.7%
2.0%
6.6%
9.7%
2.9%
9.9%
16%
15%
9.2%
11%
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
0.6%
5.5%
1.8%
-3.2%
0.7%
4.8%
2.6%
2.1%
7.0%
11%
12%
7.3%
11%
10%
10%
11%
8.4%
11%
9.2%
9.9%
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
2.4%
4.6%
3.8%
2.1%
1.9%
3.2%
4.0%
-0.1%
2.0%
7.0%
4.7%
2.3%
5.3%
7.9%
1.5%
5.5%
6.4%
8.2%
5.7%
7.0%
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
—
16%
18%
35%
11%
14%
23%
17%
21%
19%
22%
23%
19%
18%
27%
19%
18%
21%
19%
21%
ROE change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
—
—
—
—
−0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.5 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.1 pp
0.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.5 pp
−2.3 pp
−1.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.6 pp
—
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
—
—
—
—
−15.0 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.3 pp
+2.5 pp
+4.3 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.7 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.7 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.2 pp
+0.5 pp
+2.1 pp
0.0 pp
+2.0 pp
—
Chubb Limited · CB
—
—
—
—
−1.7 pp
−1.2 pp
0.0 pp
+1.3 pp
+2.4 pp
+3.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.4 pp
0.0 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.9 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.6 pp
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
—
—
—
—
—
−21.9 pp
−6.6 pp
+16.8 pp
+48.5 pp
+13.0 pp
+1.2 pp
+16.0 pp
−9.8 pp
+28.4 pp
−30.0 pp
−27.0 pp
+9.8 pp
+5.5 pp
+5.6 pp
+9.5 pp
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
—
—
—
—
−2.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.4 pp
+3.5 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.2 pp
−3.8 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.8 pp
+2.5 pp
−0.7 pp
—
Loews Corporation · L
—
—
—
—
−1.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.3 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.6 pp
0.0 pp
+0.6 pp
−1.9 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.3 pp
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
—
—
—
—
−0.5 pp
−1.3 pp
+4.0 pp
+11.5 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+3.2 pp
−3.2 pp
+5.5 pp
−2.0 pp
−6.1 pp
+2.0 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.9 pp
+2.4 pp
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
—
—
—
—
−2.9 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.5 pp
+3.1 pp
+2.4 pp
−4.8 pp
+1.9 pp
−1.0 pp
+4.6 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.9 pp
−1.2 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.9 pp
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
—
—
—
—
−5.0 pp
−4.3 pp
−4.2 pp
−3.6 pp
+3.0 pp
+9.9 pp
+8.3 pp
+9.8 pp
+6.6 pp
+1.2 pp
−3.8 pp
+7.9 pp
+8.9 pp
+5.0 pp
+6.3 pp
+1.4 pp
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
—
—
—
—
+0.1 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.8 pp
+5.3 pp
+6.3 pp
+6.2 pp
+9.5 pp
+5.2 pp
+3.5 pp
−0.7 pp
−2.0 pp
+4.1 pp
−2.1 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.5 pp
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
—
—
—
—
−0.5 pp
−1.4 pp
+0.2 pp
−2.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+3.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+2.4 pp
+3.3 pp
+0.9 pp
−3.2 pp
+3.2 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+4.2 pp
+1.5 pp
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
—
—
—
—
—
−1.8 pp
+5.6 pp
−17.8 pp
+9.8 pp
+5.0 pp
−1.1 pp
+6.0 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.3 pp
+5.1 pp
−3.9 pp
−1.5 pp
+3.4 pp
−8.7 pp
+1.9 pp
10 · not available
Gross NPA — Leaders & Improvers
No company in this Insurance - Property & Casualty comparison reports gross NPA on a comparable basis, so there is nothing to rank here — 0 of 30 companies have a usable current reading. The section is shown rather than removed so an unavailable metric is not mistaken for one that was quietly left out.
Lower gross NPA is better. Improvement means the ratio is falling, so ranks are intentionally inverted.
11 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
W. R. Berkley Corporation has the lowest P/BV ÷ ROE among the 30 Insurance - Property & Casualty companies compared here, at 0.13×. Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. is next at 0.14×. Porch Group, Inc. has the lowest P/BV at -143.7×, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: W. R. Berkley Corporation has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.13×, 7.1% below Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.. Only 24 of 30 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderW. R. Berkley Corporation · 0.13×
Gap7.1% versus #2 · Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage24/30 companies · 451 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
Banks are compared on P/BV and P/BV÷ROE, not PEG. Lower is better only if asset quality and return durability hold; cheap book value with weakening NPAs is not automatically attractive.
P/BV ÷ ROElowest return-adjusted price
P/BVlowest P/BV
Valuation · company comparison
24/30 level · 30/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
P/BV ÷ ROE · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.5
—
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
0.1
0.8
0.7
2.1
18.7
1.1
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
—
Chubb Limited · CB
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.8
1.1
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.5
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
—
0.3
0.0
—
—
—
0.0
0.2
0.1
—
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
—
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.8
—
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
6.3
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.6
—
Loews Corporation · L
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.9
—
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.6
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
0.8
0.2
—
—
1.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
3.5
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.4
1.7
0.4
0.3
0.5
—
0.2
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
0.8
0.1
0.3
—
—
0.2
0.4
0.5
1.4
0.4
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.9
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
0.7
0.5
0.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2
0.4
1.1
0.4
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
4.8
0.6
2.2
—
6.6
1.0
1.9
2.2
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.8
1.0
0.6
0.4
—
0.9
0.3
0.5
0.8
0.4
0.3
1.4
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
—
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
P/BV · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
American Financial Group, Inc. · AFG
2.0
2.3
2.6
2.9
2.7
2.9
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.7
2.4
2.4
2.6
2.5
2.3
2.6
2.4
2.3
—
Assurant, Inc. · AIZ
1.6
1.6
2.0
2.1
1.9
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.8
2.0
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.9
2.0
1.8
—
Chubb Limited · CB
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
Cincinnati Financial Corporation · CINF
1.6
1.4
1.8
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
CNA Financial Corporation · CNA
0.9
0.9
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
—
Loews Corporation · L
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
—
Markel Group Inc. · MKL
1.2
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.3
Old Republic International Corporation · ORI
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.9
1.6
1.6
The Allstate Corporation · ALL
1.4
1.3
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.0
1.7
1.8
2.0
2.1
2.5
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.2
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.8
The Progressive Corporation · PGR
2.9
3.3
3.9
4.3
4.6
4.8
5.0
4.6
4.7
4.6
5.6
5.2
5.5
5.5
5.7
4.8
4.1
4.4
3.6
3.7
The Travelers Companies, Inc. · TRV
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.8
1.8
2.0
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.7
2.1
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
2.1
W. R. Berkley Corporation · WRB
2.0
2.3
2.7
2.9
2.8
3.0
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.0
2.7
2.7
2.8
3.2
3.1
3.1
2.9
2.7
2.8
12 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Insurance - Property & Casualty comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 30 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 of the 7 ranked sections have fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROE can be manufactured with leverage. Read it beside ROA and asset quality.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- Banks and lenders are not forced through operating-margin or ROCE comparisons; missing lender-specific fields remain visibly missing.
- Thin comparisons: Funding base, Asset quality have fewer than three usable current readings.
13 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 30 Insurance - Property & Casualty companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-09-16.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-16 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
14 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Insurance - Property & Casualty company comparison FAQs
These 21 answers restate the Insurance - Property & Casualty comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 30 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-16. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Insurance - Property & Casualty sector outperforming S&P 500?
Insurance - Property & Casualty has underperformed S&P 500 by 0.2% over 52 weeks and 10.5% over 13 weeks. 13 of 30 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 11 of 30 beat the sector itself.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty company is largest by income?
The Progressive Corporation leads with income of $91,055 million, based on 21 of 30 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty company is growing fastest?
White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. has the fastest current income growth at 69.3%, across 21 of 30 comparable companies.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. ranks first at 73.5/100 with 60.2% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty company has the lowest comparable P/BV-to-ROE?
W. R. Berkley Corporation has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.13, among 24 of 30 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Insurance - Property & Casualty comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty company is the biggest?
The Progressive Corporation is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month income of $91,055 million, ahead of The Allstate Corporation at $70,137 million. That covers 21 of 30 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty company makes the most profit?
The Allstate Corporation earns the most, at $13,300 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 21 of 30 comparable companies. The Allstate Corporation has the fastest profit growth at the ≥100% scoring cap, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty company earns the highest return on capital?
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. leads on return on assets at 4.2%, across 28 of 30 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty stock is the cheapest?
On price-to-book divided by return on equity — where a LOWER number is cheaper — W. R. Berkley Corporation screens cheapest at 0.13×. Only 24 of 30 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Insurance - Property & Casualty sector beating the market?
Insurance - Property & Casualty has underperformed S&P 500 by 0.2% over the last 52 weeks and 10.5% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 13 of 30 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty stock has the strongest price momentum?
Porch Group, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Insurance - Property & Casualty company scores highest for research priority?
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. scores 73.5 out of 100 with 60.2% evidence confidence, from 20.7 points on growth and earnings, 19.8 on capital efficiency, 13.3 on valuation and 19.7 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Insurance - Property & Casualty companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 30 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Insurance - Property & Casualty sector?
The 30 Insurance - Property & Casualty companies on this page carry $615,902 million of combined market value. Chubb Limited is the largest at $131,762 million, about 21% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-16.
What is the Insurance - Property & Casualty sector's P/B ratio?
The median price-to-book ratio across the 30 Insurance - Property & Casualty companies on this page is 1.8×, measured on the 29 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-09-16.
How is the Insurance - Property & Casualty sector performing?
13 of the 30 covered Insurance - Property & Casualty companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 0.2% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-16.
How many Insurance - Property & Casualty stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 30 listed Insurance - Property & Casualty companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!