Modis Navnirman share price today

Modis Navnirman Ltd's share price was ₹390.45 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been rising for 70 weeks. That is 9.4% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹299 and ₹404, and at that close it sat 87% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Modis Navnirman Ltd is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 18 weeks in a row.

Over the last 4.3 years the share price moved +684% while the NIFTY 500 moved +60%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Three changes stood out: number of shareholders up 244% in a year, revenue up on a year earlier for 5 quarters in a row and profit up on a year earlier for 5 quarters in a row.

1. Number of shareholders up 244% in a year

   3,456 shareholders in the September 2026 quarter, against 1,005 a year earlier.

2. Revenue up on a year earlier for 5 quarters in a row

   In the September 2026 quarter revenue was ₹69 crore, +81.6% on a year earlier.

   Why: Revenue rose because sales were strong at the Signature project and early bookings came in at Icon and Avenue.

   Next results: check whether the second-half project contribution turns into revenue by the fiscal year-end.

   From the earnings call on 26 Oct 2026.

3. Profit up on a year earlier for 5 quarters in a row

   In the September 2026 quarter profit was ₹10 crore, +100% on a year earlier.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), Modis Navnirman reported revenue of ₹69.0 crore, up 81.6% from ₹38.0 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹10.0 crore, up 100.0% from ₹5.00 crore.

Modis Navnirman results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

Modis Navnirman's management discussed these results on a call held on 26 October 2026; what it said is further down this page.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Modis Navnirman closed at ₹390.45 on 4 November 2026, up 15.8% from ₹337.30 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and up 127.0% over three years. Its highest weekly close since July 2022 was ₹403.80 on 16 October 2026.

Modis Navnirman share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

234 weekly closes from 8 July 2022 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: Modis Navnirman closed at ₹390.45, down 0.4% on the week and up 5.3% on the month. 26 Oct 2026: Modis Navnirman held its results call for July to September 2026. Management guided: October to December 2026 expected to be strong as festive traction improved after Navratri.

Earlier

• Results for July to September 2026: Revenue up 81.6% and profit up 100.0% on a year earlier.

Modis Navnirman has paid no dividend on the NSE since its first NSE close in our records (8 July 2022), the start of the period we checked.

Not in its latest year. Modis Navnirman Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in FY26. It did pay a dividend in 1 of its last 8 reported years, so there is a history but no current dividend.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for July to September 2026, held on 26 October 2026, Modis Navnirman's management guided: October to December 2026 expected to be strong as festive traction improved after Navratri.

“The five projects have a GDV of around 900 crores, and we will not require any debt for them.”Mahek Modi, on the call for July to September 2026

What management guided

• Rashmi Square OC application planned for December; Signature completion planned by March 31 with collections mainly in January to March 2027; three major projects expected to contribute around ₹200 crore in H2.
• Operating profit expected above the current level, with margins improving as projects near completion and sale per square foot rises.
• Current pipeline GDV around ₹900 crore and Monolith/Heights completion costs to be self-funded; annual procurement goal at least ₹500 crore GDV, with debt possible for large land purchases.
• Rashmi Paradise launch planned for October 30 at ₹27,000-30,000 per sq ft; remaining development agreements expected after Diwali.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for July to September 2026, 26 October 2026.

The changes showing up in Modis Navnirman's own numbers are a bigger order book. It is too early to say whether they last.

We check 16 kinds of change in every company, such as costs spread over more sales, higher-value products, new orders, new regions or falling debt, against its reported numbers and what management said on its calls. Only changes the numbers back are shown.

Checked against results and calls up to April to June 2026, 10 October 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

If Square and Signature receive possession approvals and generate additional recognized revenue but operating cash generation remains negative without a reconciled collection schedule, the proposed completion-to-cash mechanism has failed.

Each change stops working if

• Completion-linked sales conversion: Possession approvals slip again or completion visibility fails to improve reconciled bookings and collections.
• Selective redevelopment mandates: Tender opportunities fail to become signed, approved projects or feasibility deteriorates before mobilization.
• Society partnership economics: Society obligations, construction advances or collection delays require increasing external funding.
• Icon and Avenue recognition runway: Construction or sales progress misses the recognition window, or new project costs offset the recognized revenue.

The main risks

• Earnings without operating cash: Working-capital absorption remains unresolved despite improving annual operating cash generation. ⚠ estimate
• Repeated delivery resets and inconsistent disclosure: Signature's handover schedule has moved again, and its booking descriptions remain unreconciled. ✓ fact
• Input-cost pressure and margin variability: Revenue growth is not translating proportionately into operating profit, and cost recovery remains unquantified. ⚠ estimate
• Recognition and regulatory gates: Construction thresholds, society awards and government restrictions can move the earnings contribution beyond the current forecast. ✓ fact

Our read after the latest results, written 10 October 2026.

When Modis Navnirman reports October to December 2026, these are the 5 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Rashmi Square and Rashmi Signature get their occupation certificates in the Oct–Dec 2026 quarter as promised, and that quarter's revenue beats ₹54.43 crore (Dec 2025) with operating profit above ₹14.69 crore.

Modis Navnirman is on 2 of our India lists: Multibagger study list and Momentum stocks.

Modis Navnirman Ltd earned ₹10.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, +100.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 5th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹29.0 Cr. That is 14.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹5.0 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹29.0 Cr (+26.1% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +81.6% on a year earlier and the margin moved +6.0 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +78.6% and revenue +82.9%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

FY26-Q4. A low comparison base magnifies growth while operating margin compresses

Why-sources: our stock research file (10 October 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.

Modis Navnirman Ltd reported ₹69.0 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +81.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 5th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 7 years it has grown 80.7% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹189 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Why this happened. The Value Chain Climb is a conditional framework here: entering another micro-market does not itself prove higher retained margins. Neel Kiran is a reported addition, while other opportunities depend on society selection and approvals. The company controls feasibility and bid selection; societies control award decisions. No incremental profit is assigned to unsigned mandates, and higher realised prices cannot be assumed to survive higher redevelopment obligations or construction costs.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹232 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹189 Cr, +83.5% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +82.9% on average, against 80.7% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +70.6%, against +41.3% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +71.4%, against +59.8% a year (accelerating).

FY26-Q4. A low comparison base magnifies growth while operating margin compresses

Why-sources: our stock research file (10 October 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.

Modis Navnirman Ltd's operating margin was 21.0% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 6.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 years it has been between −7.0% and 100.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why this happened. Management explicitly links completion-stage inventory to sales conversion. Square and Signature have advanced, but the revised possession window is a forecast after an earlier delay. Customers respond to delivery certainty; the developer retains the benefit only after construction costs, society obligations and collections are reconciled. Possession and booking conversion are one dependent mechanism, so they are not counted as separate profit engines. Pricing is described as stable, and no competitive response or collection bridge is quantified.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +5.9 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +4.6 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

FY26-Q4. A low comparison base magnifies growth while operating margin compresses

Why-sources: our stock research file (10 October 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.

Over the last 3 years Modis Navnirman Ltd's operations used more cash than they brought in, so cash conversion was −100%, a gap worth watching. In FY26 its operations used ₹2.0 Cr of cash, against ₹29.0 Cr of profit. After ₹0.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹2.0 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Modis Navnirman Ltd's customer, stock and supplier day counts come out in the thousands of days on sales this small (₹189 Cr in FY26), so no cash-cycle chart is drawn and this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent ₹1.0 Cr on assets over the last 3 years.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Averaged over those years that is 0.2% of FY26 revenue a year.

Spending on assets: ₹1.0 Cr over the last 3 years. Work still in progress is ₹0.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Modis Navnirman Ltd's P/E is 21.1×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 96.0×, over 3.9 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +26.4% while the price moved +15.8%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +31.4% a year; about +617.8% a year came from earnings growth and about −586.4 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source has, is not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 427% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Worked out from its price on 11 October 2026, Modis Navnirman Ltd's share price assumed profit growth of about 14.5% a year. Today its P/E is 21.1×, lower than 100% of its own last 3.9 years.

This works the share price backwards. It asks one question: what yearly profit growth does the price already assume? The answer is the growth rate at which eleven years of profit (six years of growth, then five years of slowing) add up to that day's market value, after each year is discounted at 11%.

This is a one-day reading, taken on 11 October 2026. Every other number on this page, the multiple included, uses the latest price as of 4 November 2026. A higher price assumes more growth and a lower price less, so it changes whenever the price changes, and this page does not update it between measurements.

Modis Navnirman Ltd's business is growing steadily. Revenue and profit growth have stayed positive throughout, and ROCE is steady at 26.0%. This is based on 8 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: steady growth with healthy returns is how a business compounds over time.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Modis Navnirman Ltd's story is not scored yet against the checks our research set on 10 October 2026. Where it sits in its own cycle: MID EXPANSION.

NOT YET CHECKED

From the price. Price stage 2, week 70, above its 200-day line, relative strength rising.

Where they disagree. The weekly cycle history's 185.9 peak and 42.3 historical trough use a different series from the deterministic curve's 205.7 peak and 25.4…

What is not proven yet. If Square and Signature receive possession approvals and generate additional recognized revenue but operating cash generation remains negative without a reconciled collection schedule, the proposed completion-to-cash mechanism has failed.

What would change our mind. If Square and Signature receive possession approvals and generate additional recognized revenue but operating cash generation remains negative without a reconciled collection schedule, the proposed completion-to-cash mechanism has failed.

The test written in advance. If Square and Signature receive possession approvals and generate additional recognized revenue but operating cash generation remains negative without a reconciled collection schedule, the proposed completion-to-cash mechanism has failed. Measured by: the thesis as written as stated by the next result.

The test written in advance. Earnings without operating cash. Measured by: Earnings without operating cash by the next result.

The test written in advance. Repeated delivery resets and inconsistent disclosure. Measured by: Repeated delivery resets and inconsistent disclosure by the next result.

What the company does. Construction progress and completion-linked demand support continued revenue recognition, with the latest quarter growing against its comparable period. The case depends on possession, bookings and collections arriving together; continued accounting growth without cash would break it.

The key numbers to watch, and the level that would change the picture

Everything further down this page is evidence for or against these.

What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: Higher revenue and profit suggest accelerating execution. The research reads it further: Operating profit increased less than revenue, with lower operating margin; the lower tax rate helped reported profit growth. The dominant mechanism is recognized project revenue rather than demonstrated margin leverage.

What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: A large profit increase could be read as an operating inflection. The research reads it further: Revenue rose from a low comparison base while operating margin fell. Interest increased and depreciation fell; the screening ledger additionally identifies non-operating income support. Reported profit therefore cannot be attributed solely to construction leverage.

• 1 · Operating leveragebuilding
• 2 · Value-added mixbuilding
• 3 · Management changequiet
• 4 · Paying down debtquiet
• 5 · Regulatory approvalquiet
• 6 · Order-book winsbuilding
• 7 · Consolidationquiet
• 8 · Demerger or value unlockquiet
• 9 · Buybackquiet
• 10 · New geographiesquiet
• 11 · More business from existing customersquiet
• 12 · New product launchquiet
• 13 · Mandatory normsquiet
• 14 · A bigger market to servequiet
• 15 · Market-share gainsquiet
• 16 · Asset qualityquiet

Lever 1 · Operating leverage: building. Advanced construction can reduce customers' perceived delivery risk and convert remaining inventory into bookings. What proves it keeps working: Completion-linked sales conversion. It stops working if Possession approvals slip again or completion visibility fails to improve reconciled bookings and collections.

Lever 6 · Order-book wins: building. The Santacruz addition demonstrates geographic execution; the remaining tender pipeline is still conditional. What proves it keeps working: Selective redevelopment mandates. It stops working if Tender opportunities fail to become signed, approved projects or feasibility deteriorates before mobilization.

Lever 2 · Value-added mix: building. Redevelopment partnerships reduce land-bank requirements, but construction funding remains the binding constraint. What proves it keeps working: Society partnership economics. It stops working if Society obligations, construction advances or collection delays require increasing external funding.

Sources: our stock research file (10 October 2026) · quarterly results through Sep 2026 · the company’s own earnings calls. The story check is re-scored every results season; the record below never changes.

The whole page in one table. Each row links to its section.

What Modis Navnirman Ltd's management promised, against what actually happened: 4 promises on the record. Read straight from the company’s own earnings calls. A promise that slipped stays on this page after it is met.

Rashmi Signature Completion Goal Slipped · 26 October 2026. In May 2026, management planned handing over Rashmi Signature in the first quarter of FY27. In Oct 2026, management moved the goal to March next year, implying a material multi-quarter delay, but the latest call did not explain the change.

Rashmi Signature handover goal moved later · 10 August 2026. In May 2026, management explicitly planned handover of Rashmi Signature in Q1 FY27. In Aug 2026, after the company was already reporting Q1 FY27, management said both Signature and Square would probably be handed over in the third quarter, indicating a material delay with no explanation for the revised timeline.

War-related margin impact was materially recharacterized · 10 August 2026. In May 2026, management described the war-related raw material impact as minor and attributed margin moderation primarily to project mix, execution and construction expenses. In Aug 2026, management instead said the major impact was because of the war, materially increasing the stated importance of the factor without reconciling the changed explanation.

Near-term expansion scope narrowed without explanation · 10 August 2026. Earlier calls described active interest in expanding beyond the core western suburbs, including southern Bombay and a potential township outside Bombay. In Aug 2026, management said it was not looking at any other city outside Maharashtra and would remain around Bombay for now, a meaningful narrowing of the previously discussed expansion opportunity set.

Every quote above is taken word for word from the company’s own earnings calls.

Modis Navnirman Ltd earned a ROCE of 26% in FY26. That is up from a low of 1% in FY23. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a 15.3% net margin and 0.62× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 15.3% net margin × 0.62× asset turnover × 1.94× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 18.4% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing is a big part of it.

The quarterly return lines and the return-on-capital-used (ROIC) line, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 427% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Modis Navnirman Ltd had ₹6.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹157 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 0.04× its equity. Its operating profit is 18 times its interest bill. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1.0 Cr to ₹6.0 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹1.0 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

Part of the spending on assets is being paid for with borrowed money.

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 427% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Foreign institutions raised their stake in Modis Navnirman Ltd by 7.4 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Foreign institutions now own 12.3% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +1.4 points over the same period, to 1.4%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Foreign institutions: +7.4 points over 8 quarters, to 12.3%; Domestic institutions: +1.4 points over 8 quarters, to 1.4%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters, to 63.8%.

Why the owners changed: foreign institutions drove it (+7.4 points), together with domestic institutions (+1.4 points). They raised their stake step by step.

For Modis Navnirman Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

73.0 out of 100, rank 1 of 12 in Construction & Contracting, with 75% of the evidence available.

Modis Navnirman Ltd scores 73.0 out of 100 against the 12 companies it is compared with in Construction & Contracting, ranking 1. Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 25.3 + 19.4 + 10.2 + 18.1 = 73. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Modis Navnirman ranks 1 of 12 Construction & Contracting companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 73.0 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Construction & Contracting, all 12 compared on one page.

Modis Navnirman is the 7th largest of 12 Construction & Contracting companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: PSP Projects, Ashoka Buildcon and Garuda Construction and Engineering. Just below it: Vascon Engineers, BEML Land Assets and Jaiprakash Associates.

Construction & Contracting companies close in size

4. PSP Projects Ltd ₹2,741 crore
5. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ₹2,706 crore
6. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd ₹1,264 crore
7. Modis Navnirman Ltd ₹769 crore
8. Vascon Engineers Ltd ₹690 crore
9. BEML Land Assets Ltd ₹667 crore
10. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd ₹594 crore

All 12 Construction & Contracting companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1762. Gaudium IVF and Women Health Ltd ₹771 crore · Hospitals/Medical Services
1763. Eldeco Housing & Industries Ltd ₹769 crore · Realty - Construction & Contracting
1764. Modis Navnirman Ltd ₹769 crore
1765. IFB Agro Industries Ltd ₹767 crore · Alcoholic Beverages
1766. Bharat Global Developers Ltd ₹764 crore · Diversified

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.