Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Construction & Contracting Stocks in India

Construction & Contracting: NCC Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the fastest current growth.

01 · the index people search for

Nifty Construction & Contracting Index — Constituents & Performance

The Construction & Contracting companies below are the listed Indian Construction & Contracting universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Construction & Contracting index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.

02 · the sector itself · before any single company

How has Construction & Contracting moved against NIFTY 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 5% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 49% on average over the last four reported quarters.

ASLEEP · 1y −8.9%~Moving with the index2 of 12 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more

RS — · 3/12 >200d (−1) · 2/12 lead (−6) · EPS 7/12↑

200500100020262025202420232022 852333 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100132Sep 22Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Sep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reporting · thin coverageMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 77, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reporting · thin coverageSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 9.2% on a year ago · 7 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 96, against 100 at the start · down 41.3% on a year ago · 6 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 72, against 100 at the start · down 6.8% on a year ago · 7 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 67, against 100 at the start · up 91.4% on a year ago · 6 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 68, against 100 at the start · up 6.9% on a year ago · 7 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 85, against 100 at the start · up 8.0% on a year ago · 6 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · up 4.5% on a year ago · 7 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 132, against 100 at the start · down 2.8% on a year ago · 7 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · up 15.8% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 92, against 100 at the start · down 13.8% on a year ago · 7 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 76, against 100 at the start · down 8.0% on a year ago · 6 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two76 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
200500100020262025202420232022 852333 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100132Sep 22Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Sep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reporting · thin coverageMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 77, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reporting · thin coverageSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 9.2% on a year ago · 7 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 96, against 100 at the start · down 41.3% on a year ago · 6 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 72, against 100 at the start · down 6.8% on a year ago · 7 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 67, against 100 at the start · up 91.4% on a year ago · 6 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 68, against 100 at the start · up 6.9% on a year ago · 7 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 85, against 100 at the start · up 8.0% on a year ago · 6 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · up 4.5% on a year ago · 7 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 132, against 100 at the start · down 2.8% on a year ago · 7 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · up 15.8% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 92, against 100 at the start · down 13.8% on a year ago · 7 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 76, against 100 at the start · down 8.0% on a year ago · 6 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two76No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Construction & Contracting, equal-weighted, based at 200 NIFTY 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 12 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

03 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Construction & Contracting outperforming NIFTY 500?

Construction & Contracting has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 16.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 7.2%. 3 of 12 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. PSP Projects Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +32.8%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.

-7.2%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
-16.6%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
3/12Stocks leading NIFTY 500
4/12Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: 20.1 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Construction & Contracting has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 16.6% over 52 weeks and 7.2% over 13 weeks. 3 of 12 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 12 beat the sector itself. NCC Ltd leads with revenue of ₹20,823 crore, based on 12 of 12 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
12
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹34.1K Cr
NCC Ltd
Revenue growing
6/11
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
3/12
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 12
04 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 75.8% evidence confidence.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Garuda Construction and Engineering LtdGARUDA 75.5/100Favorable setup76% evidence FADING 29.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 83% evidence 22.6/25 ROCE 41.8% · OPM 32% 95% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 13.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.6/20 RS sector 3.9% · RS bench -7.9% · 1Y 1.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 29.7 + 22.6 + 10.6 + 12.6 = 75.5 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Modis Navnirman LtdMODIS 65.8/100Favorable setup79% evidence FADING 21.5/35 Revenue 30.6% · PAT 29.9% · OPM change -6.4 pp 71% evidence 16.8/25 ROCE 25.8% · OPM 9.3% 95% evidence 13.5/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 14.0/20 RS sector 30.8% · RS bench 17% · 1Y 41%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 16.8 + 13.5 + 14 = 65.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3PSP Projects LtdPSPPROJECT 64.4/100Mixed-positive evidence84% evidence LEADER 20.2/35 Revenue 44.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.2 pp 74% evidence 10.4/25 ROCE 7.9% · OPM 6% 100% evidence 13.8/20 P/E 52.8× · PEG 0.65 65% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 32.8% · RS bench 18.5% · 1Y 20.8%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.2 + 10.4 + 13.8 + 20 = 64.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Mahindra Lifespace Developers LtdMAHLIFE 57.2/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence TURNING 29.9/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 182 pp 100% evidence 7.3/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 10% 100% evidence 4.7/20 P/E 27× · PEG 6.53 65% evidence 15.3/20 RS sector 12.2% · RS bench 6.6% · 1Y 6.1%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 29.9 + 7.3 + 4.7 + 15.3 = 57.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Ashoka Buildcon LtdASHOKA 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 11.1/35 Revenue -25.1% · PAT 48.6% · OPM change -16 pp 83% evidence 18.4/25 ROCE 26.5% · OPM 13% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 4.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.2/20 RS sector -11.5% · RS bench -22.2% · 1Y -39.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.1 + 18.4 + 11.5 + 8.2 = 49.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6NCC LtdNCC 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence ASLEEP 12.4/35 Revenue -6.2% · PAT -16.7% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence 15.6/25 ROCE 16.8% · OPM 9% 76% evidence 11.7/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG — 50% evidence 7.1/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -17.6% · 1Y -35.4%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.4 + 15.6 + 11.7 + 7.1 = 46.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7BEML Land Assets LtdBLAL 43.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE -193% · OPM 67.3% 95% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 314× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.6/20 RS sector -1.9% · RS bench -12.9% · 1Y -18.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 7 + 8.5 + 8.6 = 43.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Consolidated Construction Consortium LtdCCCL 42.9/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 18.0/35 Revenue 77.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change 34 pp 95% evidence 5.2/25 ROCE -1.9% · OPM -8.3% 95% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.5/20 RS sector -3.2% · RS bench -14.8% · 1Y -7.4%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 5.2 + 11.2 + 8.5 = 42.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd533285 41.3/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence 22.8/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.4 pp 83% evidence 9.4/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 3.1% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 38.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.0/20 RS sector -47.5% · RS bench -52.3% · 1Y -55.3%0 of 7 weeks ahead to 2026-06-28 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.8 + 9.4 + 9.1 + 0 = 41.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -47.5% and the one-year return is -55.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
10Man Infraconstruction LtdMANINFRA 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence ASLEEP 7.1/35 Revenue -43% · PAT -32.4% · OPM change -23 pp 83% evidence 15.1/25 ROCE 13.2% · OPM 13% 76% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 21.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 4.7/20 RS sector -21.2% · RS bench -21.1% · 1Y -44%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 7.1 + 15.1 + 11.4 + 4.7 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Vascon Engineers LtdVASCONEQ 31.6/100Adverse evidence70% evidence ASLEEP 10.1/35 Revenue -11.9% · PAT -62.5% · OPM change -5.5 pp 83% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 4.2% 95% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 29.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.4/20 RS sector -20.9% · RS bench -29.3% · 1Y -39.6%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.1 + 7.7 + 9.4 + 4.4 = 31.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Jaiprakash Associates LtdJPASSOCIAT 31.6/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence 12.0/35 Revenue -50.3% · PAT 49.8% · OPM change -11 pp 40% evidence 4.4/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -11% 71% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -12.2% · RS bench -24% · 1Y -23.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-22 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12 + 4.4 + 10 + 5.2 = 31.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 12 companies
05 · what price has already done

Market action

Modis Navnirman Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Construction & Contracting at +41%. PSP Projects Ltd leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +18.5%. 3 of 12 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-31.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

06 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

NCC Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at ₹20,823 crore. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd is next at ₹7,519 crore. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: NCC Ltd is the scale leader at ₹20,823 crore, 176.9% ahead of Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 134.5% from a ₹530 crore base, with 8 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderNCC Ltd · ₹20,823 crore
Gap176.9% versus #2 · Ashoka Buildcon Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/12 companies · 174 observations

Investor read: NCC Ltd is the scale benchmark; Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: NCC Ltd's growth falls below Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1NCC Ltd NCC₹20.8K Cr
2Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA₹7.5K Cr
3PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT₹3.5K Cr
4Jaiprakash Associates Ltd JPASSOCIAT · older report₹3.2K Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified100%
4PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT45%
5Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified31%
Revenue · company comparison
12/12 level · 11/12 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
NCC Ltd NCC₹6.2K Cr1.7%Mar 2026
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA₹2.0K Cr-27%Mar 2026
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE₹962 Cr2,906%Jun 2026
PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT₹853 Cr65%Jun 2026
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd JPASSOCIAT₹726 Cr-51%Dec 2025
Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified₹253 Cr-35%Mar 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified₹149 Cr82%Mar 2026
Man Infraconstruction Ltd MANINFRA₹146 Cr-50%Mar 2026
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified₹120 Cr134%Jun 2026
Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified₹51 Cr158%Mar 2026
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 533285₹22 Cr7.7%Mar 2026
BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified₹1 CrJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA

₹2.0K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.7K Cr
₹3.1K Cr
₹2.5K Cr
₹2.5K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹2.7K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹2.0K Cr

BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified

₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹1 Cr

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified

₹30 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹57 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹45 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹66 Cr
₹74 Cr
₹103 Cr
₹120 Cr

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified

₹35 Cr
₹47 Cr
₹62 Cr
₹82 Cr
₹125 Cr
₹116 Cr
₹140 Cr
₹149 Cr

Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT

₹1.9K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹2.0K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.5K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹672 Cr
₹685 Cr
₹726 Cr

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

₹24 Cr
₹162 Cr
₹95 Cr
₹70 Cr
₹187 Cr
₹255 Cr
₹98 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹82 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹188 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹167 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹459 Cr
₹670 Cr
₹962 Cr

Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA

₹457 Cr
₹680 Cr
₹510 Cr
₹215 Cr
₹242 Cr
₹297 Cr
₹342 Cr
₹230 Cr
₹242 Cr
₹294 Cr
₹183 Cr
₹149 Cr
₹153 Cr
₹146 Cr

Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified

₹3 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹38 Cr
₹54 Cr
₹51 Cr

NCC Ltd · NCC

₹3.9K Cr
₹4.9K Cr
₹4.4K Cr
₹4.7K Cr
₹5.3K Cr
₹6.5K Cr
₹5.5K Cr
₹5.2K Cr
₹5.3K Cr
₹6.1K Cr
₹5.2K Cr
₹4.5K Cr
₹4.9K Cr
₹6.2K Cr

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

₹486 Cr
₹555 Cr
₹348 Cr
₹360 Cr
₹500 Cr
₹730 Cr
₹514 Cr
₹620 Cr
₹705 Cr
₹668 Cr
₹623 Cr
₹586 Cr
₹630 Cr
₹673 Cr
₹518 Cr
₹703 Cr
₹813 Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹853 Cr

RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285

₹15 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹68 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹22 Cr

Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified

₹254 Cr
₹327 Cr
₹204 Cr
₹159 Cr
₹207 Cr
₹234 Cr
₹196 Cr
₹200 Cr
₹295 Cr
₹387 Cr
₹221 Cr
₹226 Cr
₹249 Cr
₹253 Cr

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA

36%
25%
27%
16%
-10%
-12%
-23%
-26%
-23%
-27%

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified

46%
-16%
27%
62%
20%
51%
82%
17%
42%
130%
134%

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified

257%
147%
126%
82%

Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT

-12%
3.4%
17%
-28%
-11%
-42%
-60%
-50%
-51%

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

-36%
19%
679%
57%
3.2%
-74%
-56%
-95%
92%
-56%
104%
-36%
-83%
125%
175%
7,344%
2,906%

Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA

-47%
-56%
-33%
7.0%
0.0%
-1.0%
-46%
-35%
-37%
-50%

Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified

238%
565%
29%
43%
51%
-39%
3.8%
70%
158%

NCC Ltd · NCC

35%
31%
26%
10%
1.6%
-5.5%
-6.3%
-13%
-8.9%
1.7%

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

9.8%
-7.7%
2.9%
32%
48%
72%
41%
-8.5%
21%
-5.5%
-11%
0.8%
-17%
20%
29%
66%
65%

RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285

70%
111%
69%
-19%
41%
-50%
-9.5%
192%
43%
49%
-67%
120%
-43%
-18%
7.7%

Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified

-19%
-29%
-4.0%
25%
43%
66%
13%
13%
-15%
-35%
07 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

BEML Land Assets Ltd has the highest OPM among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at 67.3%. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd is next at 32%. Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd has the highest Margin change at +182 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: BEML Land Assets Ltd leads opm at 67.3%; Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd leads margin change at +182 percentage points.

LeaderBEML Land Assets Ltd · 67.3%
Gap110.3% versus #2 · Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage12/12 companies · 187 observations

Investor read: BEML Land Assets Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified67%
Margin changefastest expanders
2Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified+34.0 pp
3Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified+2.0 pp
4PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT+1.2 pp
5NCC Ltd NCC0.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
12/12 level · 11/12 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified67%Jun 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified32%+2.0 ppMar 2026
Man Infraconstruction Ltd MANINFRA13%−23.0 ppMar 2026
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA13%−16.0 ppMar 2026
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE10%+182.0 ppJun 2026
Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified9.3%−6.4 ppMar 2026
NCC Ltd NCC9.0%0.0 ppMar 2026
PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT6.0%+1.2 ppJun 2026
Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified4.2%−5.5 ppMar 2026
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 5332853.1%−1.4 ppMar 2026
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified-8.3%+34.0 ppJun 2026
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd JPASSOCIAT-11%−11.0 ppDec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA

28%
28%
26%
24%
25%
23%
24%
25%
22%
21%
24%
36%
27%
29%
32%
32%
24%
13%

BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified

83%
67%

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified

-21%
-163%
-34%
-13%
-51%
-2.8%
-21%
-1.7%
-160%
-15%
-24%
-55%
-17%
-42%
-5.9%
1.3%
-8.0%
-8.3%

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified

33%
32%
32%
33%
29%
28%
30%
29%
30%
32%
32%

Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT

2.7%
-16%
4.4%
1.9%
7.0%
13%
5.0%
5.0%
2.0%
4.0%
8.0%
-3.0%
0.0%
-17%
-3.0%
-6.0%
-11%

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

-159%
-22%
-34%
-56%
-6.0%
-11%
-44%
-196%
-48%
-379%
-22%
-627%
-15%
-597%
-172%
-299%
6.0%
-7.0%
10%

Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA

15%
21%
19%
23%
28%
18%
21%
30%
42%
17%
24%
12%
25%
36%
22%
25%
21%
13%

Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified

93%
24%
11%
14%
15%
14%
24%
16%
15%
27%
9.3%

NCC Ltd · NCC

9.2%
7.7%
9.3%
9.2%
10%
9.0%
9.0%
6.0%
10%
8.0%
9.0%
9.0%
8.0%
9.0%
9.0%
9.0%
9.0%
9.0%

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

16%
16%
14%
11%
12%
11%
13%
12%
10%
8.0%
12%
6.0%
6.0%
4.8%
4.8%
7.0%
7.0%
5.0%
6.0%

RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285

6.6%
9.7%
22%
18%
17%
12%
73%
27%
47%
28%
4.0%
8.9%
5.5%
4.5%
3.7%
4.1%
-2.0%
3.1%

Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified

-3.5%
8.4%
7.9%
5.1%
8.3%
15%
7.1%
4.6%
9.8%
8.6%
8.0%
7.2%
6.7%
9.7%
5.8%
6.9%
5.2%
4.2%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA

−4.2 pp
+0.8 pp
−5.2 pp
−8.6 pp
−2.7 pp
−5.5 pp
−1.8 pp
+1.5 pp
−3.0 pp
−2.0 pp
0.0 pp
+11.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+8.0 pp
+8.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−16.0 pp

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified

−15.5 pp
−120.1 pp
−19.8 pp
−5.1 pp
−29.9 pp
+160.5 pp
+12.3 pp
+11.7 pp
−1,321.0 pp
−156.9 pp
+6.5 pp
−22.3 pp
+1,317.6 pp
+142.9 pp
−27.5 pp
+18.1 pp
+55.9 pp
+8.8 pp
+34.0 pp

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified

−4.1 pp
−4.3 pp
−1.9 pp
−4.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+2.0 pp

Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT

−2.4 pp
−43.8 pp
−0.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.3 pp
+29.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+3.1 pp
−5.0 pp
−9.0 pp
+3.0 pp
−8.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−21.0 pp
−11.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−11.0 pp

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

−131.1 pp
+44.2 pp
−17.5 pp
−71.9 pp
+153.4 pp
+11.1 pp
−10.2 pp
−139.6 pp
−42.0 pp
−368.0 pp
+22.0 pp
−431.0 pp
+33.0 pp
−218.0 pp
−150.0 pp
+328.0 pp
+21.0 pp
+590.0 pp
+182.0 pp

Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA

−4.4 pp
+2.0 pp
−26.2 pp
−7.5 pp
+13.0 pp
−3.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+6.6 pp
+14.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+3.0 pp
−18.0 pp
−17.0 pp
+19.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+13.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−23.0 pp

Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified

+66.1 pp
−81.9 pp
−10.3 pp
+3.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+3.0 pp
−6.4 pp

NCC Ltd · NCC

−2.9 pp
−3.1 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−3.2 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
+3.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

+4.2 pp
+3.3 pp
+1.3 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.7 pp
−4.9 pp
−0.8 pp
+1.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−6.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−3.2 pp
−7.2 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.2 pp

RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285

−5.7 pp
+0.9 pp
+5.6 pp
−8.9 pp
+10.6 pp
+2.6 pp
+50.4 pp
+8.2 pp
+30.0 pp
+15.8 pp
−69.0 pp
−17.6 pp
−41.6 pp
−23.5 pp
−0.3 pp
−4.9 pp
−7.5 pp
−1.4 pp

Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified

−11.5 pp
+3.8 pp
+9.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+11.8 pp
+6.8 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.5 pp
−6.6 pp
+0.9 pp
+2.6 pp
−3.1 pp
+1.1 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.5 pp
−5.5 pp
08 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Ashoka Buildcon Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at ₹2,576 crore. NCC Ltd is next at ₹724 crore. RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Ashoka Buildcon Ltd leads with ₹2,576 crore of TTM profit, 255.8% above NCC Ltd. RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (124.9% uncapped) growth from a ₹12 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderAshoka Buildcon Ltd · ₹2,576 crore
Gap255.8% versus #2 · NCC Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/12 companies · 174 observations

Investor read: Ashoka Buildcon Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA₹2.6K Cr
2NCC Ltd NCC₹724 Cr
4Man Infraconstruction Ltd MANINFRA₹211 Cr
5Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified₹122 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 533285100%
2Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified100%
5Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified30%
Net profit · company comparison
12/12 level · 9/12 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
NCC Ltd NCC₹217 Cr-18%Mar 2026
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA₹147 Cr-67%Mar 2026
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE₹86 Cr69%Jun 2026
Man Infraconstruction Ltd MANINFRA₹41 Cr-58%Mar 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified₹34 Cr89%Mar 2026
PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT₹18 Cr250%Jun 2026
Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified₹6 Cr-84%Mar 2026
Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified₹4 Cr192%Mar 2026
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 533285₹4 Cr273%Mar 2026
BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified₹-0 CrJun 2026
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified₹-5 Cr-107%Jun 2026
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd JPASSOCIAT₹-693 CrDec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA

₹138 Cr
₹-45 Cr
₹72 Cr
₹119 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹254 Cr
₹158 Cr
₹462 Cr
₹662 Cr
₹452 Cr
₹227 Cr
₹91 Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹147 Cr

BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified

₹-0 Cr
₹-0 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹-0 Cr
₹-0 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹-0 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹-0 Cr

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified

₹-35 Cr
₹-21 Cr
₹-25 Cr
₹-20 Cr
₹-618 Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹-12 Cr
₹56 Cr
₹78 Cr
₹-0 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-5 Cr

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified

₹9 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹34 Cr

Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT

₹-315 Cr
₹-316 Cr
₹-183 Cr
₹-248 Cr
₹-476 Cr
₹-431 Cr
₹-1.0K Cr
₹-298 Cr
₹-768 Cr
₹-731 Cr
₹232 Cr
₹-75 Cr
₹-693 Cr

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

₹25 Cr
₹137 Cr
₹75 Cr
₹-8 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹-4 Cr
₹-19 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹-14 Cr
₹-22 Cr
₹85 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹109 Cr
₹90 Cr
₹86 Cr

Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA

₹91 Cr
₹92 Cr
₹87 Cr
₹65 Cr
₹87 Cr
₹65 Cr
₹84 Cr
₹47 Cr
₹84 Cr
₹97 Cr
₹58 Cr
₹60 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹41 Cr

Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified

₹2 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹4 Cr

NCC Ltd · NCC

₹168 Cr
₹203 Cr
₹184 Cr
₹86 Cr
₹231 Cr
₹239 Cr
₹223 Cr
₹175 Cr
₹206 Cr
₹265 Cr
₹205 Cr
₹167 Cr
₹135 Cr
₹217 Cr

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

₹50 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹38 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹6 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹18 Cr

RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285

₹2 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹4 Cr

Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified

₹16 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹76 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹6 Cr

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA

-28%
119%
288%
569%
78%
44%
-80%
219%
-67%

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified

-96%
-101%
-104%
-107%

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified

211%
170%
154%
89%

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

-214%
36%
-99%
-105%
47%
7,000%
-144%
20%
292%
5.9%
69%

Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA

-4.4%
-29%
-3.5%
-28%
-3.5%
49%
-31%
28%
-38%
-58%

Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified

21%
-2.1%
34%
60%
-61%
10%
82%
192%

NCC Ltd · NCC

38%
18%
21%
103%
-11%
11%
-8.1%
-4.6%
-34%
-18%

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

16%
-39%
-30%
-16%
31%
77%
-11%
-65%
-7.9%
-74%
-84%
-63%
-100%
60%
260%
250%

RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285

114%
89%
5,877%
113%
-13%
-42%
54%
-70%
-46%
-26%
-90%
186%
79%
36%
273%

Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified

14%
-66%
-19%
-50%
307%
107%
134%
11%
-88%
-84%
09 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at 41.8%. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd is next at 26.5%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +15.9 percentage points. 12 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd leads ROCE at 41.8%, 15.3 percentage points above Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +15.9 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderGaruda Construction and Engineering Ltd · 41.8%
Gap57.7% versus #2 · Ashoka Buildcon Ltd
Persistence3/3 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/12 companies · 89 observations

Investor read: Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
3Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified26%
4NCC Ltd NCC17%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified+15.9 pp
2BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified+14.2 pp
3Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified+5.6 pp
5RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 533285+2.0 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
12/12 level · 12/12 change

Withheld from this chart: NCC Ltd (NCC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 9.5% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Man Infraconstruction Ltd (MANINFRA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 20% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Ashoka Buildcon Ltd (ASHOKA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 15% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified36%+15.9 ppMar 2026
Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified26%+5.6 ppMar 2026
PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT7.9%−1.1 ppJun 2026
Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified3.6%−3.3 ppMar 2026
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE-4.0%+2.8 ppJun 2026
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified-7.6%+1.2 ppJun 2026
BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified-16%+14.2 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified

-2.8%
-4.6%
-29%
-40%
-35%
-33%
-36%
-30%
-31%
-35%
-32%
-32%
-16%

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified

15%
15%
6.6%
4.1%
-664%
747%
-446%
984%
-8.8%
124%
-12%
69%
-7.6%

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified

3.8%
21%
20%
40%
29%
55%
36%

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

-4.1%
-7.2%
-6.1%
-6.7%
0.3%
-7.3%
3.7%
-8.0%
3.0%
-6.8%
4.7%
-6.3%
11%
-4.0%

Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified

-2.6%
4.8%
14%
25%
22%
23%
19%
18%
9.6%
9.9%
9.7%
11%
20%
26%

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

32%
29%
23%
26%
25%
21%
25%
13%
13%
9.0%
6.9%
5.7%
8.0%
7.9%

Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified

2.9%
5.1%
11%
10%
12%
8.6%
8.7%
4.5%
15%
6.9%
16%
6.5%
9.1%
3.6%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified

−37.3 pp
−29.9 pp
−3.8 pp
+3.7 pp
+4.7 pp
−2.2 pp
+4.5 pp
−1.7 pp
+14.2 pp

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified

−8.7 pp
−10.5 pp
−670.6 pp
+742.8 pp
+1,648.0 pp
−623.3 pp
+434.0 pp
−915.2 pp
+1.2 pp

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified

+16.3 pp
+7.6 pp
+15.9 pp

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

−2.0 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.2 pp
+10.4 pp
−8.3 pp
+10.3 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+7.7 pp
+2.8 pp

Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified

+24.2 pp
+18.3 pp
+4.8 pp
−6.7 pp
−12.0 pp
−13.2 pp
−8.6 pp
+1.2 pp
+5.6 pp

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

−9.6 pp
−2.9 pp
−2.1 pp
−1.5 pp
−11.9 pp
−7.1 pp
−17.7 pp
−7.4 pp
−5.4 pp
−1.1 pp

Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified

+7.9 pp
+5.1 pp
−2.2 pp
−1.5 pp
−7.4 pp
+5.9 pp
+7.7 pp
+2.0 pp
−5.4 pp
−3.3 pp
10 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

PSP Projects Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at 0.65×. Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd is next at 6.53×. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd has the lowest P/E at 4.22×, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: PSP Projects Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.65×, 90% below Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd. Only 2 of 12 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderPSP Projects Ltd · 0.65×
Gap90% versus #2 · Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/12 companies · 6 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT0.7
P/Elowest P/E
3NCC Ltd NCC12.7
4Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified13.1
Valuation · company comparison
2/12 level · 11/12 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE6.527.9Jun 2026
PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT0.769.7Jun 2026
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 53328530.3Mar 2026
NCC Ltd NCC11.5Mar 2026
Man Infraconstruction Ltd MANINFRA14.4Mar 2026
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA2.9Mar 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified12.6Mar 2026
Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified25.6Mar 2026
Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified8.8Mar 2026
BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified-200.0Jun 2026
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified5.7Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

2.0
6.5

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

0.7
0.2
0.9
0.7

P/E · reported quarter history

Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA

7.2
6.3
4.2
4.1
4.8
3.7
8.3
16.9
15.5
20.7
13.7
11.9
9.3
3.7
3.5
3.0
3.2
2.9

BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified

-200.0

Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified

0.1
1.4
7.3
5.2
5.7

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified

35.2
19.3
23.4
24.3
21.3
12.6

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE

-391.8
39.7
122.8
75.3
65.7
81.5
233.8
303.6
309.0
421.3
118.9
92.2
76.9
122.7
122.9
76.9
51.7
24.4
27.9

Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA

21.9
19.9
13.1
14.9
16.8
11.8
16.4
18.7
25.3
24.0
24.2
24.9
35.1
20.5
24.4
21.5
18.2
14.4

Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified

107.2
35.2
40.7
54.2
50.3
48.5
73.4
69.7
203.7
188.7
207.2
28.4
28.8
25.6

NCC Ltd · NCC

12.7
10.7
10.4
11.1
11.9
12.8
12.4
14.7
17.2
21.7
27.2
24.7
20.5
15.9
17.6
15.8
12.5
11.5

PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT

13.2
12.5
11.5
13.5
16.2
17.1
19.5
20.4
17.5
16.1
20.1
20.1
27.7
37.4
53.1
126.3
121.9
59.1
69.7

RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285

10.9
12.5
9.2
11.2
9.7
7.1
5.9
5.0
8.1
12.3
13.2
33.1
47.0
52.2
44.7
41.3
53.6
30.3

Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified

117.7
19.4
12.4
11.2
10.0
8.9
9.6
12.7
15.7
13.7
25.5
23.6
24.3
18.0
18.5
16.7
12.7
8.8
11 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Construction & Contracting comparison names 8 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 12 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. 5 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
  • 5 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
  • 3 companies are missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
  • Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
12 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 12 Construction & Contracting companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-31. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-31 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing2 cross-checked · 7 unverified · 3 withheld, of 12 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.

13 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Construction & Contracting company comparison FAQs

These 24 answers restate the Construction & Contracting comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 12 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-31. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Construction & Contracting sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

Construction & Contracting has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 16.6% over 52 weeks and 7.2% over 13 weeks. 3 of 12 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 12 beat the sector itself.

Which Construction & Contracting company is largest by revenue?

NCC Ltd leads with revenue of ₹20,823 crore, based on 12 of 12 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Construction & Contracting company is growing fastest?

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 11 of 12 comparable companies.

Which Construction & Contracting company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd ranks first at 75.5/100 with 75.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Construction & Contracting company has the lowest comparable PEG?

PSP Projects Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.65, among 2 of 12 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Construction & Contracting comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

What is the Nifty Construction & Contracting index?

The Nifty Construction & Contracting index tracks India's listed Construction & Contracting companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 12 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Construction & Contracting sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.

Which are the best Construction & Contracting stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd places first among 12 listed Construction & Contracting companies, followed by Modis Navnirman Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Construction & Contracting stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 12 listed Construction & Contracting companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.

Which Construction & Contracting company is the biggest?

NCC Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹20,823 crore, ahead of Ashoka Buildcon Ltd at ₹7,519 crore. That covers 12 of 12 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Construction & Contracting company has the best profit margins?

BEML Land Assets Ltd has the highest operating margin at 67.3%, from 12 of 12 comparable companies. Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +182 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Construction & Contracting company makes the most profit?

Ashoka Buildcon Ltd earns the most, at ₹2,576 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 12 of 12 comparable companies. RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Construction & Contracting company earns the highest return on capital?

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 41.8%, across 12 of 12 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Construction & Contracting stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — PSP Projects Ltd screens cheapest at 0.65×. Only 2 of 12 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Construction & Contracting sector beating the market?

Construction & Contracting has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 16.6% over the last 52 weeks and 7.2% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 3 of 12 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Construction & Contracting stock has the strongest price momentum?

PSP Projects Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Construction & Contracting company scores highest for research priority?

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd scores 75.5 out of 100 with 75.8% evidence confidence, from 29.7 points on growth and earnings, 22.6 on capital efficiency, 10.6 on valuation and 12.6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Construction & Contracting companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 12 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Construction & Contracting sector?

The 12 Construction & Contracting companies on this page carry ₹34,078 crore of combined market value. NCC Ltd is the largest at ₹8,858 crore, about 26% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-05.

What is the Construction & Contracting sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 12 Construction & Contracting companies on this page is 26.4×, measured on the 11 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-05.

How is the Construction & Contracting sector performing?

3 of the 12 covered Construction & Contracting companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 16.6% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-05.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI