Construction & Contracting Stocks in India
Construction & Contracting: NCC Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the fastest current growth.
Nifty Construction & Contracting Index — Constituents & Performance
The Construction & Contracting companies below are the listed Indian Construction & Contracting universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Construction & Contracting index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
How has Construction & Contracting moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 5% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 49% on average over the last four reported quarters.
RS — · 3/12 >200d (−1) · 2/12 lead (−6) · EPS 7/12↑
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 12 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Is Construction & Contracting outperforming NIFTY 500?
Construction & Contracting has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 16.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 7.2%. 3 of 12 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. PSP Projects Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +32.8%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
Sector metric: 20.1 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Construction & Contracting has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 16.6% over 52 weeks and 7.2% over 13 weeks. 3 of 12 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 12 beat the sector itself. NCC Ltd leads with revenue of ₹20,823 crore, based on 12 of 12 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Garuda Construction and Engineering LtdGARUDA | 75.5/100Favorable setup76% evidence | FADING | 29.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 83% evidence | 22.6/25 ROCE 41.8% · OPM 32% 95% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 13.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.6/20 RS sector 3.9% · RS bench -7.9% · 1Y 1.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.7 + 22.6 + 10.6 + 12.6 = 75.5 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Modis Navnirman LtdMODIS | 65.8/100Favorable setup79% evidence | FADING | 21.5/35 Revenue 30.6% · PAT 29.9% · OPM change -6.4 pp 71% evidence | 16.8/25 ROCE 25.8% · OPM 9.3% 95% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 30.8% · RS bench 17% · 1Y 41%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 16.8 + 13.5 + 14 = 65.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3PSP Projects LtdPSPPROJECT | 64.4/100Mixed-positive evidence84% evidence | LEADER | 20.2/35 Revenue 44.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.2 pp 74% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 7.9% · OPM 6% 100% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 52.8× · PEG 0.65 65% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 32.8% · RS bench 18.5% · 1Y 20.8%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 10.4 + 13.8 + 20 = 64.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Mahindra Lifespace Developers LtdMAHLIFE | 57.2/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 29.9/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 182 pp 100% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 10% 100% evidence | 4.7/20 P/E 27× · PEG 6.53 65% evidence | 15.3/20 RS sector 12.2% · RS bench 6.6% · 1Y 6.1%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.9 + 7.3 + 4.7 + 15.3 = 57.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Ashoka Buildcon LtdASHOKA | 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.1/35 Revenue -25.1% · PAT 48.6% · OPM change -16 pp 83% evidence | 18.4/25 ROCE 26.5% · OPM 13% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 4.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -11.5% · RS bench -22.2% · 1Y -39.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.1 + 18.4 + 11.5 + 8.2 = 49.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6NCC LtdNCC | 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.4/35 Revenue -6.2% · PAT -16.7% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 16.8% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 7.1/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -17.6% · 1Y -35.4%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.4 + 15.6 + 11.7 + 7.1 = 46.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7BEML Land Assets LtdBLAL | 43.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE -193% · OPM 67.3% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 314× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.6/20 RS sector -1.9% · RS bench -12.9% · 1Y -18.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 7 + 8.5 + 8.6 = 43.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Consolidated Construction Consortium LtdCCCL | 42.9/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.0/35 Revenue 77.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change 34 pp 95% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -1.9% · OPM -8.3% 95% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -3.2% · RS bench -14.8% · 1Y -7.4%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 5.2 + 11.2 + 8.5 = 42.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd533285 | 41.3/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | 22.8/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.4 pp 83% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 3.1% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 38.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -47.5% · RS bench -52.3% · 1Y -55.3%0 of 7 weeks ahead to 2026-06-28 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 9.4 + 9.1 + 0 = 41.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -47.5% and the one-year return is -55.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 10Man Infraconstruction LtdMANINFRA | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.1/35 Revenue -43% · PAT -32.4% · OPM change -23 pp 83% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 13.2% · OPM 13% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 21.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -21.2% · RS bench -21.1% · 1Y -44%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.1 + 15.1 + 11.4 + 4.7 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Vascon Engineers LtdVASCONEQ | 31.6/100Adverse evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.1/35 Revenue -11.9% · PAT -62.5% · OPM change -5.5 pp 83% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 4.2% 95% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 29.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.4/20 RS sector -20.9% · RS bench -29.3% · 1Y -39.6%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.1 + 7.7 + 9.4 + 4.4 = 31.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Jaiprakash Associates LtdJPASSOCIAT | 31.6/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | 12.0/35 Revenue -50.3% · PAT 49.8% · OPM change -11 pp 40% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -11% 71% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -12.2% · RS bench -24% · 1Y -23.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-22 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 12 + 4.4 + 10 + 5.2 = 31.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Market action
Modis Navnirman Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Construction & Contracting at +41%. PSP Projects Ltd leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +18.5%. 3 of 12 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-31.
Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Construction & Contracting itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
NCC Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at ₹20,823 crore. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd is next at ₹7,519 crore. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: NCC Ltd is the scale leader at ₹20,823 crore, 176.9% ahead of Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 134.5% from a ₹530 crore base, with 8 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: NCC Ltd is the scale benchmark; Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: NCC Ltd's growth falls below Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCC Ltd NCC | ₹6.2K Cr | 1.7% | Mar 2026 |
| Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA | ₹2.0K Cr | -27% | Mar 2026 |
| Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE | ₹962 Cr | 2,906% | Jun 2026 |
| PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT | ₹853 Cr | 65% | Jun 2026 |
| Jaiprakash Associates Ltd JPASSOCIAT | ₹726 Cr | -51% | Dec 2025 |
| Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified | ₹253 Cr | -35% | Mar 2026 |
| Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified | ₹149 Cr | 82% | Mar 2026 |
| Man Infraconstruction Ltd MANINFRA | ₹146 Cr | -50% | Mar 2026 |
| Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified | ₹120 Cr | 134% | Jun 2026 |
| Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified | ₹51 Cr | 158% | Mar 2026 |
| RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 533285 | ₹22 Cr | 7.7% | Mar 2026 |
| BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified | ₹1 Cr | — | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA
Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified
NCC Ltd · NCC
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285
Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA
Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified
NCC Ltd · NCC
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285
Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
BEML Land Assets Ltd has the highest OPM among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at 67.3%. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd is next at 32%. Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd has the highest Margin change at +182 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: BEML Land Assets Ltd leads opm at 67.3%; Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd leads margin change at +182 percentage points.
Investor read: BEML Land Assets Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified | 67% | — | Jun 2026 |
| Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified | 32% | +2.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Man Infraconstruction Ltd MANINFRA | 13% | −23.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA | 13% | −16.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE | 10% | +182.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified | 9.3% | −6.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| NCC Ltd NCC | 9.0% | 0.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT | 6.0% | +1.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified | 4.2% | −5.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 533285 | 3.1% | −1.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified | -8.3% | +34.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Jaiprakash Associates Ltd JPASSOCIAT | -11% | −11.0 pp | Dec 2025 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA
BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA
Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified
NCC Ltd · NCC
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285
Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified
Margin change · reported quarter history
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA
Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified
NCC Ltd · NCC
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285
Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at ₹2,576 crore. NCC Ltd is next at ₹724 crore. RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Ashoka Buildcon Ltd leads with ₹2,576 crore of TTM profit, 255.8% above NCC Ltd. RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (124.9% uncapped) growth from a ₹12 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: Ashoka Buildcon Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCC Ltd NCC | ₹217 Cr | -18% | Mar 2026 |
| Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA | ₹147 Cr | -67% | Mar 2026 |
| Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE | ₹86 Cr | 69% | Jun 2026 |
| Man Infraconstruction Ltd MANINFRA | ₹41 Cr | -58% | Mar 2026 |
| Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified | ₹34 Cr | 89% | Mar 2026 |
| PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT | ₹18 Cr | 250% | Jun 2026 |
| Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified | ₹6 Cr | -84% | Mar 2026 |
| Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified | ₹4 Cr | 192% | Mar 2026 |
| RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 533285 | ₹4 Cr | 273% | Mar 2026 |
| BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified | ₹-0 Cr | — | Jun 2026 |
| Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified | ₹-5 Cr | -107% | Jun 2026 |
| Jaiprakash Associates Ltd JPASSOCIAT | ₹-693 Cr | — | Dec 2025 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA
BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd · JPASSOCIAT
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA
Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified
NCC Ltd · NCC
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285
Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA
Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified
NCC Ltd · NCC
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285
Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified
Return On Capital Employed
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at 41.8%. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd is next at 26.5%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +15.9 percentage points. 12 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd leads ROCE at 41.8%, 15.3 percentage points above Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +15.9 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
Investor read: Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
Withheld from this chart: NCC Ltd (NCC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 9.5% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Man Infraconstruction Ltd (MANINFRA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 20% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Ashoka Buildcon Ltd (ASHOKA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 15% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified | 36% | +15.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified | 26% | +5.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT | 7.9% | −1.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified | 3.6% | −3.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE | -4.0% | +2.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified | -7.6% | +1.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified | -16% | +14.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified
ROCE change · reported quarter history
BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
PSP Projects Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 12 Construction & Contracting companies compared here, at 0.65×. Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd is next at 6.53×. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd has the lowest P/E at 4.22×, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 12 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: PSP Projects Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.65×, 90% below Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd. Only 2 of 12 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd MAHLIFE | 6.5 | 27.9 | Jun 2026 |
| PSP Projects Ltd PSPPROJECT | 0.7 | 69.7 | Jun 2026 |
| RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd 533285 | — | 30.3 | Mar 2026 |
| NCC Ltd NCC | — | 11.5 | Mar 2026 |
| Man Infraconstruction Ltd MANINFRA | — | 14.4 | Mar 2026 |
| Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ASHOKA | — | 2.9 | Mar 2026 |
| Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd GARUDA⚠ unverified | — | 12.6 | Mar 2026 |
| Modis Navnirman Ltd MODIS⚠ unverified | — | 25.6 | Mar 2026 |
| Vascon Engineers Ltd VASCONEQ⚠ unverified | — | 8.8 | Mar 2026 |
| BEML Land Assets Ltd BLAL⚠ unverified | — | -200.0 | Jun 2026 |
| Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd CCCL⚠ unverified | — | 5.7 | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
P/E · reported quarter history
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd · ASHOKA
BEML Land Assets Ltd · BLAL⚠ unverified
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd · CCCL⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd · GARUDA⚠ unverified
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd · MAHLIFE
Man Infraconstruction Ltd · MANINFRA
Modis Navnirman Ltd · MODIS⚠ unverified
NCC Ltd · NCC
PSP Projects Ltd · PSPPROJECT
RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd · 533285
Vascon Engineers Ltd · VASCONEQ⚠ unverified
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Construction & Contracting comparison names 8 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 12 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. 5 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
- 5 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
- 3 companies are missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 12 Construction & Contracting companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-31. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.
Construction & Contracting company comparison FAQs
These 24 answers restate the Construction & Contracting comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 12 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-31. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Construction & Contracting sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
Construction & Contracting has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 16.6% over 52 weeks and 7.2% over 13 weeks. 3 of 12 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 12 beat the sector itself.
Which Construction & Contracting company is largest by revenue?
NCC Ltd leads with revenue of ₹20,823 crore, based on 12 of 12 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Construction & Contracting company is growing fastest?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 11 of 12 comparable companies.
Which Construction & Contracting company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd ranks first at 75.5/100 with 75.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Construction & Contracting company has the lowest comparable PEG?
PSP Projects Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.65, among 2 of 12 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Construction & Contracting comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
What is the Nifty Construction & Contracting index?
The Nifty Construction & Contracting index tracks India's listed Construction & Contracting companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 12 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Construction & Contracting sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best Construction & Contracting stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd places first among 12 listed Construction & Contracting companies, followed by Modis Navnirman Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Construction & Contracting stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 12 listed Construction & Contracting companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which Construction & Contracting company is the biggest?
NCC Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹20,823 crore, ahead of Ashoka Buildcon Ltd at ₹7,519 crore. That covers 12 of 12 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Construction & Contracting company has the best profit margins?
BEML Land Assets Ltd has the highest operating margin at 67.3%, from 12 of 12 comparable companies. Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +182 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Construction & Contracting company makes the most profit?
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd earns the most, at ₹2,576 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 12 of 12 comparable companies. RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Construction & Contracting company earns the highest return on capital?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 41.8%, across 12 of 12 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Construction & Contracting stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — PSP Projects Ltd screens cheapest at 0.65×. Only 2 of 12 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Construction & Contracting sector beating the market?
Construction & Contracting has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 16.6% over the last 52 weeks and 7.2% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 3 of 12 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Construction & Contracting stock has the strongest price momentum?
PSP Projects Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Construction & Contracting company scores highest for research priority?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd scores 75.5 out of 100 with 75.8% evidence confidence, from 29.7 points on growth and earnings, 22.6 on capital efficiency, 10.6 on valuation and 12.6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Construction & Contracting companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 12 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Construction & Contracting sector?
The 12 Construction & Contracting companies on this page carry ₹34,078 crore of combined market value. NCC Ltd is the largest at ₹8,858 crore, about 26% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-05.
What is the Construction & Contracting sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 12 Construction & Contracting companies on this page is 26.4×, measured on the 11 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-05.
How is the Construction & Contracting sector performing?
3 of the 12 covered Construction & Contracting companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 16.6% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-05.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.