Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd
GARUDAGaruda Construction and Engineering Ltd is coiled. The quarters are improving, yet the P/E sits at the 4th percentile of its own 1-year range — the business is moving before the market.
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −19% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (5 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 4th percentile of its own 1-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +50.0% year on year, and −19% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd trades at ₹182, in a confirmed uptrend and 5 weeks into that stage. That is +3.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 39% of a 52-week range of ₹144 to ₹242. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 5 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹182 it trades +3.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 39% of its 52-week range (₹144–₹242).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.9 years the stock moved +73% while the NIFTY 500 moved +0% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd trades at 12.4× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 4% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 17.5×, measured across 1.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 12.4× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 4% of the time, against a long-run median of 17.5× measured over 1.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +146.2% against a −10.6% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.
Solved at its 13 June 2026 price, Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd was paying for profit growth of about 4.3% a year. Profit itself has compounded 144.0% a year over the past 1 years. Today the market pays 12.4× P/E, the 4th percentile of its own 1-year range.
What the two numbers say together. The multiple is low against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is below what this company has actually delivered.
How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 13 June 2026, not a running figure — every other number on this page, the multiple included, is read off the live quote as of 11 September 2026. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 5 quarters across 0 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +135.0% | — | — | — |
| Profit | +144.0% | — | — | — |
| EPS | +146.2% | — | — | — |
| Share price | −10.6% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
76.9/100 — rank 1 of 12 in Construction & Contracting · 80% evidence confidence
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd scores 76.9 out of 100 against the 12 companies it is compared with in Construction & Contracting, ranking 1. Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 30.6 + 19.5 + 10.6 + 16.2 = 76.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd reported ₹175 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +40.0% year on year. That is the 5th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 1 years it has compounded at 135.0% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹531 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹580 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹531 Cr (+135.0% on the year), capping 1 years at 135.0% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹175 Cr, +40.0% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +98.6% growth against the decade's 135.0% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's operating margin is 32.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +3.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 32.0%, +3.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 2 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 29.0%–31.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +2.9 pp year on year while gross margin went +1.5 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd earned ₹42.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +50.0% year on year. It is the 5th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹122 Cr. The 1-year compound rate is 144.0%. That is 24.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹28.0 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹42.0 Cr, +50.0% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹122 Cr (+144.0%), and the 1-year compound rate is 144.0%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +40.0% and the margin +3.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +115.7% vs revenue +98.6%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 2 fiscal years −19% of Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹78.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹122 Cr of profit. After ₹114 Cr of capital spending, ₹−36.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹78.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹122 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−36.0 Cr after ₹114 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is −19% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why conversion sits at −19%: the cash cycle tightened 283 days between FY25 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −8 days in FY26, down from 275 days in FY25. Capital spending ran ₹114 Cr over the last 1 years. At FY26 sales of ₹531 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.5 Cr, so roughly ₹−12.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 102 days, inventory at 13 days — roughly 0.4 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −8 days, tighter than FY25's 275.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 13 days to sell; customers pay about 102 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 123 days — netting out to the −8-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹531 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.5 Cr — so the −8-day loop keeps roughly ₹−12.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹114 Cr over the last 1 fiscal years. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹2.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd earns a ROCE of 42% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +18.8 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 23.0% net margin on 0.82× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 42%.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 23.0% net margin × 0.82× asset turns × 1.42× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 26.8% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 30.8% − 12.0% = a +18.8 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd carries total debt of ₹12.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹454 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.03 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.00 in FY25 to 0.03 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹12.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹454 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.03. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.00 (FY25) to 0.03 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Foreign institutions cut 4.0 points of Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd over 6 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 2.6% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −1.2 points over the same window, to 0.2%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −4.0 points over 6 quarters to 2.6%; Domestic institutions: −1.2 points over 6 quarters to 0.2%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 6 quarters to 67.6%.
🚨 Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (−4.0 points), alongside domestic institutions (−1.2 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltdthis pageGARUDA | 76.9/100Favorable setup80% evidence | TURNING | 30.6/35 Revenue 83.5% · PAT 97.1% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 19.5/25 ROCE 41.8% · OPM 32% 95% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 12.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.2/20 RS sector 12.7% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y -10.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.6 + 19.5 + 10.6 + 16.2 = 76.9 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Modis Navnirman LtdMODIS | 71.0/100Favorable setup87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.5/35 Revenue 50.8% · PAT 55% · OPM change -3 pp 95% evidence | 18.5/25 ROCE 25.8% · OPM 19.2% 95% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 23.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 20.1% · RS bench 8.1% · 1Y 33.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.5 + 18.5 + 13.8 + 15.2 = 71 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 3Man Infraconstruction LtdMANINFRA | 58.5/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | TURNING | 11.4/35 Revenue -29.8% · PAT -24.5% · OPM change 11 pp 95% evidence | 16.0/25 ROCE 13.2% · OPM 33% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 23.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 23.1% · RS bench 9.3% · 1Y -20.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.4 + 16 + 11.1 + 20 = 58.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 9.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 4Mahindra Lifespace Developers LtdMAHLIFE | 56.5/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 30.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 182 pp 100% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 10% 100% evidence | 4.7/20 P/E 24.2× · PEG 6.53 65% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 9.4% · RS bench -2.1% · 1Y -2.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.5 + 7 + 4.7 + 14.3 = 56.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5PSP Projects LtdPSPPROJECT | 55.8/100Mixed-positive evidence84% evidence | FADING | 19.3/35 Revenue 44.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.2 pp 74% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 7.9% · OPM 6% 100% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 45.7× · PEG 0.65 65% evidence | 11.9/20 RS sector 14.1% · RS bench 2.5% · 1Y 19.9%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 10.8 + 13.8 + 11.9 = 55.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6NCC LtdNCC | 45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence76% evidence | BASING | 11.2/35 Revenue -1.8% · PAT -12.1% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 16.8% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 12.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -11.3% · 1Y -31.8%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.2 + 15.6 + 11.7 + 6.9 = 45.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Ashoka Buildcon LtdASHOKA | 45.2/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | BASING | 9.1/35 Revenue -24.6% · PAT 37.3% · OPM change -15 pp 95% evidence | 18.4/25 ROCE 26.4% · OPM 17% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 4.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -10.1% · RS bench -20.7% · 1Y -38.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.1 + 18.4 + 11.5 + 6.2 = 45.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Consolidated Construction Consortium LtdCCCL | 43.2/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.4/35 Revenue 77.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change 34 pp 95% evidence | 5.6/25 ROCE -1.9% · OPM -8.3% 95% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -3.2% · RS bench -19.6% · 1Y -32.1%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 5.6 + 11.2 + 8 = 43.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9RDB Infrastructure and Power Ltd533285 | 42.4/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | 22.8/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.4 pp 83% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 3.1% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 38.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.1/20 RS sector -46.5% · RS bench -52.3% · 1Y -41.6%0 of 1 week ahead to 2026-06-28 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 9.4 + 9.1 + 1.1 = 42.4 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -46.5% and the one-year return is -41.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 10BEML Land Assets LtdBLAL | 40.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE -193% · OPM 67.3% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 294× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -3.5% · RS bench -14% · 1Y -28.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 7.4 + 8.5 + 5.2 = 40.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Vascon Engineers LtdVASCONEQ | 29.6/100Adverse evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 8.3/35 Revenue -20.2% · PAT -80% · OPM change -2.5 pp 95% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 3.3% 95% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 24.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -20.9% · RS bench -27.7% · 1Y -46.4%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.3 + 8.1 + 9.4 + 3.8 = 29.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Jaiprakash Associates LtdJPASSOCIAT | 30.9/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | 11.8/35 Revenue -50.3% · PAT 49.8% · OPM change -11 pp 40% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -11% 71% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -12.2% · RS bench -24% · 1Y -33%3 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-22 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 4.4 + 10 + 4.7 = 30.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's share price today?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd trades at ₹182, −10.6% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹1,692 Cr. The stock sits at 39% of its 52-week range of ₹144–₹242, +3.7% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 5 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.
What were Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd reported revenue of ₹175 Cr and net profit of ₹42.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 40.0% and profit rose 50.0% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹4.46. The operating margin was 32.0%, 3.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's revenue?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd reported revenue of ₹175 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +40.0% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹531 Cr (+135.0%). Over the last 1 years revenue compounded at 135.0% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's profit?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd earned ₹42.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +50.0% year on year — the 5th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹122 Cr. The operating margin ran 32.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's market cap?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹1,692 Cr at a share price of ₹182. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's P/E ratio?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd trades at a P/E of 12.4×, at the 4th percentile of its own 1-year range, against a long-run median of 17.5×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 2 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd looks cheap: its P/E of 12.4× has been cheaper only 4% of the time in 1 years (long-run median 17.5×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd growing?
Yes — Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +40.0% year on year, profit +50.0%, and the margin +3.0 pp at 32.0%. The 1-year compound rates are 135.0% (revenue) and 144.0% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 11 September 2026.
How is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd performing?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 5 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 40.0% and profit rose 50.0% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 5 of stage 2), trading +3.7% versus its 200-day average and at 39% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.9 years the stock moved +73% against the NIFTY 500's +0% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.
Will Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹182, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 5 weeks in. Its P/E of 12.4× sits at the 4th percentile of its own 1-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.
Who owns Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd?
Promoters hold 67.6% of Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd, foreign institutions 2.6%, domestic institutions 0.2% and the public 29.6% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions cut 4.0 points over 6 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd have too much debt?
No — Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.03, and operating profit covers the interest bill 55×. FY26 borrowings were ₹12.0 Cr against equity of ₹455 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's capex?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd spent ₹114 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 1 fiscal year, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹114 Cr, with ₹2.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's cash flow?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd generated ₹78.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−36.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹114 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹122 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's profit real cash?
No — operating cash was negative over the last 2 fiscal years: Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd consumed cash while reporting profit. In FY26, operating cash was ₹78.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹122 Cr. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.
Where is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd in its business cycle?
Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 31.0%, against a 2-year band of 29.0%–31.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 32.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.
What growth does Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's price assume?
At its price on 13 June 2026, Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 4.3% a year. Profit itself has compounded 144.0% a year over the past 1 years. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 11 September 2026.
What could break the Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −19% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd is coiled. The quarters are improving, yet the P/E sits at the 4th percentile of its own 1-year range — the business is moving before the market. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!