Garuda Construction and Engineering share price today

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's share price was ₹155.15 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 1 week. That is 9.9% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 5 weeks running.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹136 and ₹242, and at that close it sat 18% of the way up from that low.

Over the last 2 years the share price moved +48% while the NIFTY 500 moved −4%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 1 October 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Three changes stood out: revenue up on a year earlier for 8 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare), indian funds and insurers (DIIs) cut their stake for 4 quarters in a row and profit up on a year earlier for 6 quarters in a row.

1. Revenue up on a year earlier for 8 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare)

   In the June 2026 quarter revenue was ₹175 crore, +40% on a year earlier.

2. Indian funds and insurers (DIIs) cut their stake for 4 quarters in a row

   From 1.1% to 0.2% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

3. Profit up on a year earlier for 6 quarters in a row

   In the June 2026 quarter profit was ₹42 crore, +50% on a year earlier.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), Garuda Construction and Engineering reported revenue of ₹175 crore, up 40.0% from ₹125 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹42.0 crore, up 50.0% from ₹28.0 crore.

Garuda Construction and Engineering results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Garuda Construction and Engineering closed at ₹155.15 on 4 November 2026, down 36.0% from ₹242.37 a year earlier (7 November 2025). Its highest weekly close since October 2024 was ₹242.37 on 7 November 2025.

Garuda Construction and Engineering share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

113 weekly closes from 18 October 2024 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: Garuda Construction and Engineering closed at ₹155.15, up 14.2% on the week and down 9.9% on the month. 23 Oct 2026: ex-date for an interim dividend of ₹0.03 a share.

Earlier

• Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 40.0% and profit up 50.0% on a year earlier.

Garuda Construction and Engineering paid ₹0.03 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 5 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 0.02% at the ₹155.15 close on 4 November 2026. The last was an interim dividend of ₹0.03 a share, ex-date 23 October 2026.

Garuda Construction and Engineering dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

No. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 7 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

Garuda Construction and Engineering is on one of our India lists: 52 week high & low.

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd earned ₹42.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +50.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 6th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹123 Cr. Over 6 years profit has grown 123.0% a year on average. That is 24.0% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹28.0 Cr.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹123 Cr (+146.0% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +40.0% on a year earlier and the margin moved +3.0 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +115.7% and revenue +99.2%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd reported ₹175 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +40.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 8th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 6 years it has grown 27.4% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹531 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹580 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹531 Cr, +136.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +99.2% on average, against 27.4% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +84.1%, against +82.6% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising); profit over the last 12 months grew +97.1%, against +79.9% a year (accelerating).

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's operating margin was 32.0% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 3.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 years it has been between 3.4% and 35.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +2.9 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +9.8 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's operations used more cash than they brought in, so cash conversion was −37%, a gap worth watching. In FY26 it brought in ₹41.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹123 Cr of profit.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

After ₹59.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹18.0 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's customer, stock and supplier day counts come out in the thousands of days on sales this small (₹531 Cr in FY26), so no cash-cycle chart is drawn and this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent ₹68.0 Cr on assets over the last 3 years.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Averaged over those years that is 4.3% of FY26 revenue a year.

Spending on assets: ₹68.0 Cr over the last 3 years. Work still in progress is ₹2.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's P/E is 10.6×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 22.2×, over 2 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +146.2% while the price moved −36.0%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd's business is giving mixed signals. Growth is slowing from a very fast pace: revenue growth has eased from +100.0% at its peak to +40.0% (from single-quarter figures), but the business is still expanding, with ROCE rising at 47.6%. This is based on 9 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: when the lines disagree, each line above matters more than any single label.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd earned a ROCE of 42% in FY26. That is up from a low of 30% in FY25. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 17.6 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 23.2% net margin and 0.83× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 23.2% net margin × 0.83× asset turnover × 1.41× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 27.2% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 29.6% − 12.0% = +17.6 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each rupee put back into the business creates more than a rupee of value.

The 29.6% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 32.1%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd has total debt of ₹12.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹454 Cr as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.03× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.00 in FY25 to 0.03 in FY26. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Foreign institutions cut their stake in Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd by 4.4 percentage points over 7 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Foreign institutions now own 2.2% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −1.3 points over the same period, to 0.2%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Foreign institutions: −4.4 points over 7 quarters, to 2.2%; Domestic institutions: −1.3 points over 7 quarters, to 0.2%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 7 quarters, to 67.6%.

Why the owners changed: foreign institutions drove it (−4.4 points), together with domestic institutions (−1.3 points). They reduced their stake.

For Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

63.7 out of 100, rank 2 of 12 in Construction & Contracting, with 79% of the evidence available.

Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd scores 63.7 out of 100 against the 12 companies it is compared with in Construction & Contracting, ranking 2. Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is -6.3% and the one-year return is -37.3%.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 28.8 + 20.5 + 11.2 + 3.2 = 63.7. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Garuda Construction and Engineering ranks 2 of 12 Construction & Contracting companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 63.7 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Construction & Contracting, all 12 compared on one page.

Garuda Construction and Engineering is the 6th largest of 12 Construction & Contracting companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Man Infraconstruction, PSP Projects and Ashoka Buildcon. Just below it: Modis Navnirman, Vascon Engineers and BEML Land Assets.

Construction & Contracting companies close in size

3. Man Infraconstruction Ltd ₹4,311 crore
4. PSP Projects Ltd ₹2,741 crore
5. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd ₹2,706 crore
6. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd ₹1,264 crore
7. Modis Navnirman Ltd ₹769 crore
8. Vascon Engineers Ltd ₹690 crore
9. BEML Land Assets Ltd ₹667 crore

All 12 Construction & Contracting companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1463. IFGL Refractories Ltd ₹1,265 crore · Refractories
1464. TGV Sraac Ltd ₹1,265 crore · Chemicals - Inorganic - Caustic Soda/Soda Ash
1465. Garuda Construction and Engineering Ltd ₹1,264 crore
1466. India Motor Parts & Accessories Ltd ₹1,256 crore · Auto Ancillaries - Spare Parts Accessories
1467. Bharat Parenterals Ltd ₹1,253 crore · Pharma - Formulators

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.