Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-21
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-21

NeoVolta Inc.

NEOV
Industrials · Electrical Equipment & Parts

NeoVolta Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.

The price is between stages. Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.

Price
$3.4
−40.3% 1Y
Revenue (Mar 26)
$0.0 B
Profit (Mar 26)
$0.0 B
ROE
−88%
FY25
ROIC
−40.1%
vs WACC 2.4% → −42.5 pp
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

NeoVolta Inc. trades at $3.4, between stages. That is +7.6% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 41% of a 52-week range of $2 to $6. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 7 straight weeks.

Today the stock is between stages. At $3.4 it trades +7.6% versus its 200-day average and sits at 41% of its 52-week range ($2–$6).

Sep 26: $3.4 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
+7.6% versus the 200-day line, week — of stage —
Price50-day avg200-day avg
$6.1$5.0$3.8$2.6$1.5$$3$3Jul 25Oct 25Feb 26May 26Sep 26
$6.1$5.0$3.8$2.6$1.5$$3$3Jul 25Feb 26Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2025 Each cell is one week from 2025 to now (63 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 25Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.2 years the stock moved −25% while the S&P 500 moved +22% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 7 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

P/E does not price NeoVolta Inc. — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. A P/E returns here the first period the bottom line turns positive.

With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.

P/E
earnings negative
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read.

NeoVolta Inc. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
1.2%0.6%0.0%−0.6%−1.2%%0%Jun 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Mar 26
1.2%0.6%0.0%−0.6%−1.2%%0%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 0.0% · span 0.0%–0.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

42.1/100 — rank 17 of 30 in Electrical Equipment & Parts · 55% evidence confidence

NeoVolta Inc. scores 42.1 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Electrical Equipment & Parts, ranking 17. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 19.8 + 4.2 + 10 + 8.1 = 42.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

NeoVolta Inc. reported $0.0 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.0 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.0 B. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

FY25 revenue came in at $0.0 B (null on the year). The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.0 B, null year on year.

FY25 revenue $0.0 B (null YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Revenue
0.0110.0080.0050.0030.000$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.0110.0080.0050.0030.000$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.0 B (null YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)
0.0110.0080.0050.0030.000$ B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.0110.0080.0050.0030.000$ B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

A clean operating margin is not in our numbers for NeoVolta Inc. — its accounts do not report the operating-profit line this section reads, which is common for lenders and holding companies. The sections above and below carry the readings this company's filings do support.

This company's accounts do not report the operating-profit line this section reads — common for lenders and holding companies classified outside the financial bucket. The revenue and net-profit sections are the cleaner reads for NeoVolta Inc..

Why: the numbers show the operating margin move clearly, but the cost lines behind it sit below what we hold — so we state the move without inventing its driver.

FY25: 0.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 1-year window.
within a 0.0–0.0% band over 1 years
operating margin
1.2%0.6%0.0%−0.6%−1.2%%0%FY25
1.2%0.6%0.0%−0.6%−1.2%%0%FY25
Mar 26: null% operating margin (null pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating margin
1.2%0.6%0.0%−0.6%−1.2%%0%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.2%0.6%0.0%−0.6%−1.2%%0%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

NeoVolta Inc. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.01 B. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was $0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.0 B (null).

FY25 profit $−0.0 B (null YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profit
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.0 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

NeoVolta Inc.'s cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY25 that was $0.0 B of operating cash against $−0.0 B of profit. After null of capital spending, $0.0 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

FY25: operating cash of $0.0 B against reported profit of $−0.0 B, leaving free cash of $0.0 B after null of capital spending.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $0.0 B vs profit $−0.0 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0B$0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.001−0.002−0.005−0.008−0.011$ B$0B$0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: operating cash $0.0 B Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)100%
1.2101.2%0.6100.6%0.0100.0%−0.699.4%−1.298.8%$ B%$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.2101.2%0.6100.6%0.0100.0%−0.699.4%−1.298.8%$ B%$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

NeoVolta Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day-counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

NeoVolta Inc. earns a ROE of 0% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −42.5 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses.

FY23 ROE is 0%.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −40.1% − 2.4% = a −42.5 pp spread. The 2.4% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY23: ROE 0% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 1-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 2.4% cost of capital used on this page.
the full ladder
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
8.0%−12%−32%−52%−73%%0%−67%FY23
8.0%−12%−32%−52%−73%%0%−67%FY23
Mar 26: ROIC −130.6% (TTM) vs WACC 2.4% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
29%−69%−167%−265%−363%%−130.6%−23.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
29%−69%−167%−265%−363%%−130.6%−23.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend

NeoVolta Inc. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

NeoVolta Inc. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

NeoVolta Inc. carries total debt of $0.0 B against shareholder equity of $0.0 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.00 — effectively unlevered. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of $0.0 B against shareholder equity of $0.0 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY25: debt $0.0 B at null× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
1.21.2×0.60.6×0.00.0×−0.6−0.6×−1.2−1.2×$ B×$0B0.00×FY21FY23FY25
1.21.2×0.60.6×0.00.0×−0.6−0.6×−1.2−1.2×$ B×$0B0.00×FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $0.0 B, debt-to-equity 0.00 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
1.21.2×0.60.6×0.00.0×−0.6−0.6×−1.2−1.2×$ B×$0B0.00×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.21.2×0.60.6×0.00.0×−0.6−0.6×−1.2−1.2×$ B×$0B0.00×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

9.5% of NeoVolta Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 2.3 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 9.5% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 2.3 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
9.5%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
2.3
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

NeoVolta Inc.: the Z-score reads 22.09. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 22.09 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 22.09.

15 · Related companies · Electrical Equipment & Parts
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.ESP 66.2/100Favorable setup75% evidence FADING 19.4/35 Revenue -8.7% · PAT 37.5% · OPM change 9.1 pp 83% evidence 15.6/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 26.1% 76% evidence 16.0/20 P/E 14.5× · PEG 0.34 65% evidence 15.2/20 RS sector 16.6% · RS bench 10.9% · 1Y 40.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.4 + 15.6 + 16 + 15.2 = 66.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2nVent Electric plcNVT 63.9/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 22.2/35 Revenue 46.2% · PAT 1.9% · OPM change 3.9 pp 95% evidence 19.3/25 ROCE 14% · OPM 20.5% 76% evidence 5.2/20 P/E 45.8× · PEG 4.29 65% evidence 17.2/20 RS sector 18.5% · RS bench 12.6% · 1Y 59.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.2 + 19.3 + 5.2 + 17.2 = 63.9 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
3Bloom Energy CorporationBE 62.1/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence ASLEEP 25.5/35 Revenue 91.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 18 pp 71% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 17.1% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 403.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.8/20 RS sector 49% · RS bench 39.7% · 1Y 212.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.5 + 13.3 + 8.5 + 14.8 = 62.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Preformed Line Products CompanyPLPC 60.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 45% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 7.8% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 46.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.0/20 RS sector 36.3% · RS bench 29.5% · 1Y 104.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.5 + 13.9 + 9.5 + 19 = 60.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Vertiv Holdings CoVRT 60.8/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 24.5/35 Revenue 26.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2.7 pp 95% evidence 16.4/25 ROCE 8.3% · OPM 19.5% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 75.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.9/20 RS sector 1.3% · RS bench -4.1% · 1Y 73.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.5 + 16.4 + 9 + 10.9 = 60.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Atkore Inc.ATKR 57.9/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.1/35 Revenue -3.4% · PAT -162.5% · OPM change 8.8 pp 62% evidence 9.7/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 1.4% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.9/20 RS sector 27.2% · RS bench 21.8% · 1Y 56.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.1 + 9.7 + 10.2 + 18.9 = 57.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7Acuity Inc.AYI 57.2/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 20.0/35 Revenue 10.5% · PAT 17.7% · OPM change 4.2 pp 95% evidence 15.0/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 16.1% 76% evidence 12.7/20 P/E 20.2× · PEG 1.07 65% evidence 9.5/20 RS sector -10.5% · RS bench -13.7% · 1Y -10%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 15 + 12.7 + 9.5 = 57.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.AEIS 57.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 25.7/35 Revenue 22.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5.8 pp 83% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 13.4% 76% evidence 12.1/20 P/E 67.9× · PEG 0.94 65% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -8.2% · RS bench -12.9% · 1Y 50.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.7 + 13.3 + 12.1 + 6 = 57.1 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -8.2% and the one-year return is 50.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
9Energizer Holdings, Inc.ENR 51.9/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence ASLEEP 18.5/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.5 pp 83% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 2.4% · OPM 13.5% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 6× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.3/20 RS sector -1.3% · RS bench -4.8% · 1Y -25.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.5 + 11.8 + 11.3 + 10.3 = 51.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Hayward Holdings, Inc.HAYW 50.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 45% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 16.6% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.5/20 RS sector -17.8% · RS bench -20.9% · 1Y -12.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 13.6 + 10.7 + 8.5 = 50.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11EnerSysENS 49.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 10.7/35 Revenue 3.7% · PAT -19.8% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 12.5% 76% evidence 14.7/20 P/E 22.6× · PEG 0.49 65% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector -0.3% · RS bench -5.4% · 1Y 61.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.7 + 13.9 + 14.7 + 10 = 49.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
12Kimball Electronics, Inc.KE 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence BASING 15.9/35 Revenue -6.3% · PAT 50% · OPM change 0.2 pp 83% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 3.3% 76% evidence 14.6/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG 0.49 65% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -10.6% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y -22%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 10.7 + 14.6 + 6.6 = 47.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Hubbell IncorporatedHUBB 45.2/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 11.1/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT 8.2% · OPM change -1.2 pp 95% evidence 18.8/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 21.7% 76% evidence 6.0/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG 3.29 65% evidence 9.3/20 RS sector -9.2% · RS bench -13% · 1Y 1.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.1 + 18.8 + 6 + 9.3 = 45.2 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
14Electrovaya Inc.ELVA 44.1/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence BASING 20.5/35 Revenue 50% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2.8 pp 83% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 12.1% 76% evidence 7.2/20 P/E 71.1× · PEG 2.27 65% evidence 5.5/20 RS sector -19.2% · RS bench -23.5% · 1Y -5.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.5 + 10.9 + 7.2 + 5.5 = 44.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.EOSE 43.8/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence BASING 26.0/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 367 pp 62% evidence 5.0/25 ROCE -18.7% · OPM -139.2% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 6.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.6/20 RS sector -59.4% · RS bench -60.5% · 1Y -59.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26 + 5 + 11.2 + 1.6 = 43.8 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -59.4% and the one-year return is -59.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
16Amprius Technologies, Inc.AMPX 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence ASLEEP 24.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 62.3 pp 62% evidence 5.9/25 ROCE -6.1% · OPM -23.4% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 2.9/20 RS sector -29% · RS bench -32.7% · 1Y -19.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.3 + 5.9 + 10 + 2.9 = 43.1 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -29% and the one-year return is -19.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
17NeoVolta Inc.this pageNEOV 42.1/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -61.6 pp 62% evidence 4.2/25 ROCE -19.4% · OPM -129.7% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 8.1/20 RS sector -6.2% · RS bench -8.8% · 1Y -40.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 4.2 + 10 + 8.1 = 42.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Plug Power Inc.PLUG 40.9/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence BASING 19.3/35 Revenue 15.3% · PAT — · OPM change 66.5 pp 62% evidence 6.2/25 ROCE -4.7% · OPM -67% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.4/20 RS sector -19.1% · RS bench -23% · 1Y -4.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.3 + 6.2 + 10 + 5.4 = 40.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19FuelCell Energy, Inc.FCEL 39.8/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 11.2/35 Revenue 31% · PAT — · OPM change -123.2 pp 71% evidence 4.7/25 ROCE -8.9% · OPM -218.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.9/20 RS sector 43.4% · RS bench 34.7% · 1Y 116.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.2 + 4.7 + 10 + 13.9 = 39.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 34.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
20Powell Industries, Inc.POWL 38.5/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 9.7/35 Revenue 4.5% · PAT 7.5% · OPM change -1.7 pp 83% evidence 16.3/25 ROCE 8.9% · OPM 19.4% 76% evidence 4.8/20 P/E 35.3× · PEG 4.52 65% evidence 7.7/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench -7.1% · 1Y 85.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.7 + 16.3 + 4.8 + 7.7 = 38.5 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
21T1 Energy Inc.TE 37.8/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence ASLEEP 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 35.2 pp 39% evidence 7.8/25 ROCE -2.5% · OPM -12.7% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 1.1/20 RS sector -30.1% · RS bench -34.1% · 1Y 113.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.9 + 7.8 + 10 + 1.1 = 37.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22GrafTech International Ltd.EAF 31.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 10.3/35 Revenue 0.6% · PAT — · OPM change -8.2 pp 62% evidence 7.4/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -24.5% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 76.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -25.4% · RS bench -27.5% · 1Y -38.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.3 + 7.4 + 8.8 + 5.2 = 31.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23Forgent Power Solutions, Inc.FPS 45.9/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence ASLEEP 16.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.6 pp 45% evidence 11.1/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 10.4% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 250.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —3 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.1 + 11.1 + 8.7 + 10 = 45.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24Arxis, Inc.ARXS 45.4/100Thin evidence · provisional28% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -14.2 pp 26% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 6.5% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —10 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 14.7 + 10.7 + 10 + 10 = 45.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25ADS-TEC Energy PLCADSE 44.0/100Thin evidence · provisional32% evidence ASLEEP 16.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 7.3/25 ROCE -30.3% · OPM — 46% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 0.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.2/20 RS sector -3.2% · RS bench -7% · 1Y 24.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16 + 7.3 + 11.5 + 9.2 = 44 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26X-Energy, Inc.XE 42.1/100Thin evidence · provisional28% evidence ASLEEP 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -25.8 pp 26% evidence 4.5/25 ROCE -11.9% · OPM -152.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 8 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 17.6 + 4.5 + 10 + 10 = 42.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
27Factorial Energy Inc.FAC 41.3/100Thin evidence · provisional18% evidence ASLEEP 16.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 8% evidence 5.2/25 ROCE -34.9% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -37.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.1 + 5.2 + 10 + 10 = 41.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28Ballard Power Systems Inc.BLDP 41.1/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence BASING 20.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 118.5 pp 45% evidence 6.6/25 ROCE -2.7% · OPM -70.3% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 4.5/20 RS sector -29.9% · RS bench -33.6% · 1Y -20.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 6.6 + 10 + 4.5 = 41.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29Lightbridge CorporationLTBR 41.0/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence ASLEEP 20.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 7.3/25 ROCE -5.6% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.7/20 RS sector -53.5% · RS bench -54.9% · 1Y -64.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 7.3 + 10 + 3.7 = 41 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30Enovix CorporationENVX 39.5/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence ASLEEP 20.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8 pp 45% evidence 5.3/25 ROCE -7.2% · OPM -577.6% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.4/20 RS sector -58% · RS bench -59.5% · 1Y -70.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.8 + 5.3 + 10 + 3.4 = 39.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is NeoVolta Inc.'s stock price today?

NeoVolta Inc. trades at $3.4, −40.3% over the past year. The company is valued at $0.0 B. The stock sits at 41% of its 52-week range of $2–$6, +7.6% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 7 weeks. — as of 21 September 2026.

What were NeoVolta Inc.'s latest quarterly results?

NeoVolta Inc. reported revenue of $0.0 B and net profit of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. — as of 21 September 2026.

What is NeoVolta Inc.'s revenue?

NeoVolta Inc. reported revenue of $0.0 B in the Mar 26 quarter. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.0 B. — as of 21 September 2026.

What is NeoVolta Inc.'s profit?

NeoVolta Inc. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.0 B. — as of 21 September 2026.

What is NeoVolta Inc.'s market cap?

NeoVolta Inc.'s market capitalisation is $0.0 B at a stock price of $3.4. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 21 September 2026.

Does NeoVolta Inc. pay a dividend?

No — NeoVolta Inc. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 21 September 2026.

How is NeoVolta Inc. performing?

NeoVolta Inc.'s latest readings are below. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 7 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 21 September 2026.

Is NeoVolta Inc. beating the market?

On recent form, yes — NeoVolta Inc. has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 7 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.2 years the stock moved −25% against the S&P 500's +22% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 21 September 2026.

Will NeoVolta Inc.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for NeoVolta Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $3.4. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 21 September 2026.

Is the market betting against NeoVolta Inc.?

Somewhat — short interest is 9.5% of NeoVolta Inc.'s tradable float, about 2.3 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 21 September 2026.

Does NeoVolta Inc. have too much debt?

No — NeoVolta Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 0.07. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 21 September 2026.

What is NeoVolta Inc.'s cash flow?

NeoVolta Inc. generated $0.0 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.0 B of free cash flow after null of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.0 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 21 September 2026.

How financially safe is NeoVolta Inc.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 22.09 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 21 September 2026.

Where is NeoVolta Inc. in its business cycle?

NeoVolta Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 0.0%, against a 1-year band of 0.0%–0.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 21 September 2026.

What could break the NeoVolta Inc. story?

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 21 September 2026.

Is NeoVolta Inc. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: NeoVolta Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 21 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-21. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI