Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.

HTZ
Industrials · Rental & Leasing Services

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.

The price is between stages. But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.

Stage
Deteriorating
partial read
Price
$1.5
−74.8% 1Y
Revenue (Mar 26)
$2.0 B
+10.5% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
$−0.3 B
Operating margin
−4.0%
+9.3 pp YoY
ROIC
1.1%
vs WACC 4.4% → −3.3 pp
Cash conversion
224%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. trades at $1.5, between stages. That is −68.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 0% of a 52-week range of $2 to $7. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (7 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is between stages. At $1.5 it trades −68.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 0% of its 52-week range ($2–$7).

Aug 26: $1.5 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
−68.7% versus the 200-day line, week — of stage —
Price50-day avg200-day avg
$8.0$6.3$4.5$2.8$1.0$$2$5Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26May 26Aug 26
$8.0$6.3$4.5$2.8$1.0$$2$5Jul 25Jan 26Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2025 Each cell is one week from 2025 to now (57 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 25Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved −80% while the S&P 500 moved +24% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (7 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-18) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

P/E does not price Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. A P/E returns here the first period the bottom line turns positive.

With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.

P/E
earnings negative
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Deteriorating

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue and profit growth are shrinking (revenue growth −0.9% latest against +8.4% at its 12-quarter best). The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −6.1% in FY25 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
20%348%13%174%6.2%0.0%−1.0%−174%−8.1%−348%%%−6.1%−300%FY21FY23FY25
20%348%13%174%6.2%0.0%−1.0%−174%−8.1%−348%%%−6.1%−300%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising
RevenueProfitEPS
9.7%80%5.1%−22%0.5%−124%−4.1%−226%−8.7%−328%%%−0.9%−300%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
9.7%80%5.1%−22%0.5%−124%−4.1%−226%−8.7%−328%%%−0.9%−300%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Recovering
latest −0.9% · span −7.4% to +8.4%
Profit growth
Falling
latest −1,452.2% · span −1,452.2% to −35.5%

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−6.1%−0.7%
Stock price−74.8%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+10.5%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
3.7%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

38.5/100 — rank 14 of 18 in Rental & Leasing Services · 58% evidence confidence

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. scores 38.5 out of 100 against the 18 companies it is compared with in Rental & Leasing Services, ranking 14. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 19.3 + 4.9 + 11.3 + 3 = 38.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. reported $2.0 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +10.5% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 3.7% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $8.5 B. The last four reported quarters add to $8.7 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $8.5 B (−6.1% on the year), capping 4 years at 3.7% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $2.0 B, +10.5% year on year.

FY25 revenue $8.5 B (−6.1% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
3.7% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
1020%7.613%5.16.2%2.5−1.0%0.0−8.1%$ B%$9B−6.1%FY21FY23FY25
1020%7.613%5.16.2%2.5−1.0%0.0−8.1%$ B%$9B−6.1%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $2.0 B (+10.5% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
2.912%2.25.6%1.5−1.3%0.7−8.1%0.0−15%$ B%$2B10.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
2.912%2.25.6%1.5−1.3%0.7−8.1%0.0−15%$ B%$2B10.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −0.2% growth against the decade's 3.7% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −0.9% over the last 4 quarters against −3.8%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s operating margin is −4.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +9.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −28.2% to 23.9%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −4.0%, +9.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −28.2%–23.9%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +9.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +9.0 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY25: −3.6% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a −28.2–23.9% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
28%29%13%12%−2.1%−5.0%−17%−22%−32%−39%%%−3.6%24.6%FY21FY23FY25
28%29%13%12%−2.1%−5.0%−17%−22%−32%−39%%%−3.6%24.6%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: −4.0% operating margin (+9.3 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
28%68%6.1%31%−16%−6.5%−38%−44%−60%−81%%%−4%9.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
28%68%6.1%31%−16%−6.5%−38%−44%−60%−81%%%−4%9.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. posted a net loss of $0.3 B in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.8 B. That loss is 16.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.4 B. 9 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was $−0.3 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.8 B (null).

FY25 profit $−0.8 B (null YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
2.5555%1.0255%−0.4−45%−1.8−344%−3.3−644%$ B%$−1B−561.3%FY21FY23FY25
2.5555%1.0255%−0.4−45%−1.8−344%−3.3−644%$ B%$−1B−561.3%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $−0.3 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
0.866%0.2−143%−0.4−353%−0.9−562%−1.5−772%$ B%$−0B−311.1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.866%0.2−143%−0.4−353%−0.9−562%−1.5−772%$ B%$−0B−311.1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 224% of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $1.6 B of operating cash against $−0.8 B of profit. After $10.3 B of capital spending, $−8.7 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $1.6 B against reported profit of $−0.8 B, leaving free cash of $−8.7 B after $10.3 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 224% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $1.6 B vs profit $−0.8 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution. FY22/FY25 reflects an acquisition year — point shown clipped.
224% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
3.40.2−2.9−6.1−9.3$ B$2B$−1B$−8BFY21FY23FY25
3.40.2−2.9−6.1−9.3$ B$2B$−1B$−8BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: operating cash $0.0 B Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
1.0490%0.7385%0.5281%0.2176%0.071%$ B%$0B461%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.0490%0.7385%0.5281%0.2176%0.071%$ B%$0B461%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $31.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 121.6% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $31.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $10.3 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
128.75.82.90.0$ B$10BFY21FY23FY25
128.75.82.90.0$ B$10BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: capex $3.6 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
4.1−0.43.1−1.32.1−2.11.0−3.00.0−3.8$ B$ B$4B$−4BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
4.1−0.43.1−1.32.1−2.11.0−3.00.0−3.8$ B$ B$4B$−4BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. earns a ROE of 163% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −1,907% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −3.3 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −8.8% net margin on 0.38× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is 163%, recovered from a FY24 trough of −1,907% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −8.8% net margin × 0.38× asset turns × −48.50× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 162.2% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 1.1% − 4.4% = a −3.3 pp spread. The 4.4% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY25: ROE 163% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 4.4% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY24's −1,907%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
329%−272%−872%−1,472%−2,072%%163%−1.5%FY21FY23FY25
329%−272%−872%−1,472%−2,072%%163%−1.5%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: ROIC −0.7% (TTM) vs WACC 4.4% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
285%163%41%−82%−204%%−0.7%251%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
285%163%41%−82%−204%%−0.7%251%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from 4.17 in FY21 to −42.02 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of $20.6 B against shareholder equity of $−0.8 B — a debt-to-equity of −26.06. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 4.17 (FY21) to −42.02 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY25: debt $19.3 B at −42.02× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
21135.9×1688.1×1040.4×5.2−7.4×0.0−55.2×$ B×$19B−42.02×FY21FY23FY25
21135.9×1688.1×1040.4×5.2−7.4×0.0−55.2×$ B×$19B−42.02×FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $20.6 B, debt-to-equity −26.06 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
22138.4×1781.7×1125.0×5.6−31.7×0.0−88.3×$ B×$21B−26.06×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
22138.4×1781.7×1125.0×5.6−31.7×0.0−88.3×$ B×$21B−26.06×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

75.5% of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — a large bloc is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 3.3 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 75.5% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 3.3 days to buy those positions back. A large bloc is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
75.5%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
3.3
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.: the Z-score reads 0.18. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of 0.18 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 0.18.

15 · Related companies · Rental & Leasing Services
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Willis Lease Finance CorporationWLFC 64.7/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence ASLEEP 21.1/35 Revenue 26.1% · PAT 15.2% · OPM change — 45% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence 15.6/20 P/E 10.3× · PEG 0.81 65% evidence 14.6/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench 12.1% · 1Y 41.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 13.4 + 15.6 + 14.6 = 64.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2United Rentals, Inc.URI 60.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 45% evidence 17.1/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM 21.8% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 27.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.0/20 RS sector 3.5% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 33.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.1 + 17.1 + 9.6 + 15 = 60.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3PROG Holdings, Inc.PRG 60.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence 14.9/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM 8.8% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.9/20 RS sector 11.5% · RS bench 21.2% · 1Y 46.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.2 + 14.9 + 10.8 + 17.9 = 60.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Ryder System, Inc.R 53.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.8 pp 45% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 7.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 21.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.0/20 RS sector 5.5% · RS bench 14.5% · 1Y 51.3%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.1 + 12.8 + 10 + 14 = 53.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Herc Holdings Inc.HRI 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.8 pp 45% evidence 9.6/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 9% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 97.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.3/20 RS sector 2.4% · RS bench 12% · 1Y 54.6%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.6 + 9.6 + 9.1 + 14.3 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Vestis CorporationVSTS 53.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence LEADER 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence 7.8/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 4.1% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 192× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.7/20 RS sector 43.7% · RS bench 54% · 1Y 193.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 7.8 + 8.9 + 19.7 = 53.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Custom Truck One Source, Inc.CTOS 51.6/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence TURNING 20.7/35 Revenue 9.4% · PAT — · OPM change 3.9 pp 62% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 6.8% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 58.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 23.3% · RS bench 33.1% · 1Y 93.3%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.7 + 8.1 + 9.4 + 13.4 = 51.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8McGrath RentCorpMGRC 47.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 14.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.4 pp 45% evidence 16.2/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 21.9% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.8/20 RS sector -12.7% · RS bench -4.5% · 1Y 2.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.8 + 16.2 + 10.2 + 5.8 = 47 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9U-Haul Holding CompanyUHAL 46.5/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence BREAKING OUT 13.9/35 Revenue 3.6% · PAT -77.4% · OPM change -2.8 pp 62% evidence 5.7/25 ROCE -0.5% · OPM -5.8% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 199.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.2/20 RS sector 9.2% · RS bench 19.2% · 1Y 29.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.9 + 5.7 + 8.7 + 18.2 = 46.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 19.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
10GATX CorporationGATX 45.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.6 pp 45% evidence 14.6/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 53.8% 76% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 17.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.5/20 RS sector -14.7% · RS bench -6.7% · 1Y 20.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 14.6 + 10.4 + 1.5 = 45.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11Avis Budget Group, Inc.CAR 39.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 20.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 14.7 pp 45% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM -8.9% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 8× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.3/20 RS sector -24.6% · RS bench -18.2% · 1Y -8.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.5 + 6.7 + 11.1 + 1.3 = 39.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Sunbelt Rentals Holdings, Inc.SUNB 38.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence TURNING 7.9/35 Revenue 3.4% · PAT -12.8% · OPM change -5.5 pp 95% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 14.9% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 24.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.4/20 RS sector -7.5% · RS bench 1.1% · 1Y 18.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 7.9 + 13.4 + 9.8 + 7.4 = 38.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13WillScot Holdings CorporationWSC 38.5/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 7.2/35 Revenue -4.1% · PAT -553.3% · OPM change -3.7 pp 83% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 17.6% 76% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 17.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.4/20 RS sector -1.3% · RS bench 7.4% · 1Y 9.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 7.2 + 12.3 + 10.6 + 8.4 = 38.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.this pageHTZ 38.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 19.3/35 Revenue -1% · PAT — · OPM change 9.4 pp 62% evidence 4.9/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM -4.1% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 7.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -75.4% · RS bench -72.8% · 1Y -72.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.3 + 4.9 + 11.3 + 3 = 38.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15Alta Equipment Group Inc.ALTG 31.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 9.8/35 Revenue -1.8% · PAT — · OPM change -1.6 pp 62% evidence 3.8/25 ROCE -0.7% · OPM -1.4% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 68.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.5/20 RS sector -4.2% · RS bench 4.3% · 1Y -3.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.8 + 3.8 + 9.3 + 8.5 = 31.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16Neutron Holdings, Inc.LIME 51.2/100Thin evidence · provisional24% evidence 16.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.3 pp 13% evidence 14.4/25 ROCE 35.6% · OPM -17.1% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.8 + 14.4 + 10 + 10 = 51.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17AerCap Holdings N.V.AER 48.3/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence ASLEEP 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 7% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -7.5% · RS bench 1.2% · 1Y 40.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 13.4 + 11.5 + 5.3 = 48.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18EquipmentShare.com Inc.EQPT 46.9/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 22.4/35 Revenue 23.6% · PAT — · OPM change 1.5 pp 62% evidence 6.0/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 0.1% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 226.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —1 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 22.4 + 6 + 8.5 + 10 = 46.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s stock price today?

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. trades at $1.5, −74.8% over the past year. The company is valued at $0.0 B. The stock sits at 0% of its 52-week range of $2–$7, −68.7% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 7 weeks. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. reported revenue of $2.0 B and a net loss of $0.3 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $−1.06. The operating margin was −4.0%, 9.3 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s revenue?

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. reported revenue of $2.0 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +10.5% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $8.5 B (−6.1%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 3.7% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s profit?

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. earned $−0.3 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.8 B. The operating margin ran −4.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s market cap?

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $0.0 B at a stock price of $1.5. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. pay a dividend?

No — Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.

How is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. performing?

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s latest readings are below. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 7 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

What stage is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. in?

Deteriorating — revenue and profit growth are shrinking (revenue growth −0.9% latest against +8.4% at its 12-quarter best). The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −0.9% latest, profit growth −1,452.2% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (7 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-18), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved −80% against the S&P 500's +24% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $1.5. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is the market betting against Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.?

Yes — short interest is 75.5% of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s tradable float, about 3.3 days to cover at typical volumes. A crowded short: a large bloc is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s capex?

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. spent $31.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $10.3 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s cash flow?

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. generated $1.6 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−8.7 B of free cash flow after $10.3 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.8 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 224% of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $1.6 B against reported profit of $−0.8 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 0.18 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. in its business cycle?

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was −3.6%, against a 5-year band of −28.2%–23.9%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran −4.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. story?

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI