Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-16
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery Stocks

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery: Caterpillar Inc. owns the largest revenue base; Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 0% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 22% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 7 weeks running.

FADING · −5 in 4wMoving with the index6 of the 19 companies with a long enough price record ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months2 are 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more

RS ↑7w · 6/19 >200d (−7) · 6/19 lead (−5) · EPS 5/19↑

20020262025202420232022 388347 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100179Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 13 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 113, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 125, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 143, against 100 at the start · up 43.2% on a year ago · 15 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 154, against 100 at the start · up 44.4% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 164, against 100 at the start · up 37.4% on a year ago · 15 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 173, against 100 at the start · up 40.8% on a year ago · 15 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 179, against 100 at the start · up 35.5% on a year ago · 15 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 164, against 100 at the start · up 7.0% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 145, against 100 at the start · down 8.1% on a year ago · 15 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 137, against 100 at the start · down 15.4% on a year ago · 16 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 138, against 100 at the start · down 34.6% on a year ago · 16 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 142, against 100 at the start · down 37.8% on a year ago · 16 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 137, against 100 at the start · down 6.3% on a year ago · 16 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · down 21.2% on a year ago · 16 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · down 21.4% on a year ago · 16 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or twoNOT REPORTED YET103 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20020262025202420232022 388347 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100179Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 13 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 113, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 125, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 143, against 100 at the start · up 43.2% on a year ago · 15 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 154, against 100 at the start · up 44.4% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 164, against 100 at the start · up 37.4% on a year ago · 15 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 173, against 100 at the start · up 40.8% on a year ago · 15 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 179, against 100 at the start · up 35.5% on a year ago · 15 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 164, against 100 at the start · up 7.0% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 145, against 100 at the start · down 8.1% on a year ago · 15 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 137, against 100 at the start · down 15.4% on a year ago · 16 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 138, against 100 at the start · down 34.6% on a year ago · 16 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 142, against 100 at the start · down 37.8% on a year ago · 16 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 137, against 100 at the start · down 6.3% on a year ago · 16 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · down 21.2% on a year ago · 16 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · down 21.4% on a year ago · 16 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two103No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of 19 of its 21 companies — the 2 with too short a price record are ranked in the scorecard but cannot sit in this line. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery outperforming S&P 500?

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery has underperformed S&P 500 by 4% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 1.9%. 6 of 20 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. The Manitowoc Company, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +46.3%.

+1.9%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-4.0%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
6/20Stocks leading S&P 500
6/20Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery has underperformed S&P 500 by 4% over 52 weeks and 1.9% over 13 weeks. 6 of 20 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 6 of 20 beat the sector itself. Caterpillar Inc. leads with revenue of $74,729 million, based on 13 of 21 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
21
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$660.6B
Caterpillar Inc.
Revenue growing
7/12
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
6/20
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 21
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Deere & Company has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 85.3% evidence confidence.
CNH Industrial N.V. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
CNH Industrial N.V. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Deere & CompanyDE 66.4/100Favorable setup85% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.8/35 Revenue 8.3% · PAT -6.4% · OPM change -1.7 pp 95% evidence 15.9/25 ROCE 9.1% · OPM 13.4% 76% evidence 12.5/20 P/E 32.8× · PEG 1 65% evidence 18.2/20 RS sector 13.8% · RS bench 13.1% · 1Y 42.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 15.9 + 12.5 + 18.2 = 66.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Caterpillar Inc.CAT 63.6/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 27.5/35 Revenue 18.4% · PAT 14.9% · OPM change 4.5 pp 83% evidence 21.2/25 ROCE 22.2% · OPM 22.2% 76% evidence 5.4/20 P/E 45.2× · PEG 2.48 65% evidence 9.5/20 RS sector 0.8% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y 67.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27.5 + 21.2 + 5.4 + 9.5 = 63.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
3CNH Industrial N.V.CNH 58.9/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.4/35 Revenue -4% · PAT -62.5% · OPM change -3.8 pp 53% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 9.9% 57% evidence 14.2/20 P/E 35.5× · PEG 0.46 65% evidence 19.5/20 RS sector 17.7% · RS bench 16.8% · 1Y 23.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.4 + 10.8 + 14.2 + 19.5 = 58.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 16.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
4The Manitowoc Company, Inc.MTW 56.3/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.5/35 Revenue 5.2% · PAT -82.6% · OPM change -0.5 pp 40% evidence 7.8/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 0.6% 57% evidence 14.0/20 P/E 58.3× · PEG 0.14 65% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 46.3% · RS bench 45.2% · 1Y 109.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 7.8 + 14 + 17 = 56.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Blue Bird CorporationBLBD 54.9/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence ASLEEP 19.3/35 Revenue 10.1% · PAT 21.1% · OPM change 1.7 pp 53% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 10.4% · OPM 11.1% 57% evidence 15.3/20 P/E 13.5× · PEG 0.52 65% evidence 6.7/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench -4.1% · 1Y 3.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.3 + 13.6 + 15.3 + 6.7 = 54.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Federal Signal CorporationFSS 53.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 21.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.7 pp 39% evidence 15.6/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 15.9% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 27.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -6.1% · RS bench -6.6% · 1Y -7.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.3 + 15.6 + 9.9 + 6.4 = 53.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7AGCO CorporationAGCO 52.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence TURNING 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1 pp 39% evidence 9.7/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.6/20 RS sector -1% · RS bench -1.7% · 1Y 9.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 9.7 + 11 + 12.6 = 52.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Gencor Industries, Inc.GENC 51.5/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence BREAKING OUT 13.3/35 Revenue -10.3% · PAT -7.1% · OPM change -4.5 pp 53% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 12.5% 57% evidence 11.6/20 P/E 17× · PEG 1.32 65% evidence 15.1/20 RS sector 8.7% · RS bench 8.1% · 1Y 13%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.3 + 11.5 + 11.6 + 15.1 = 51.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Oshkosh CorporationOSK 48.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence FADING 16.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.1 pp 39% evidence 13.2/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 3.5% 76% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.7/20 RS sector -4.2% · RS bench -5% · 1Y 8.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.2 + 13.2 + 10.6 + 8.7 = 48.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Alamo Group Inc.ALG 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence FADING 16.6/35 Revenue 2.3% · PAT -12.2% · OPM change -1.3 pp 53% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 10.1% 57% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 19.7× · PEG 1.36 65% evidence 7.5/20 RS sector -8.5% · RS bench -9.2% · 1Y -15.1%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 13.3 + 10.8 + 7.5 = 48.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11PACCAR IncPCAR 45.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence FADING 16.2/35 Revenue -10.6% · PAT -18.5% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence 13.2/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 11.7% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 25.2× · PEG 1.48 65% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -4.2% · RS bench -4.8% · 1Y 18.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.2 + 13.2 + 9.6 + 6.6 = 45.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Astec Industries, Inc.ASTE 41.1/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence ASLEEP 18.1/35 Revenue 11.5% · PAT 73.3% · OPM change -3.9 pp 53% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 2.3% 57% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 48.1× · PEG 1.01 65% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -23.7% · RS bench -24.2% · 1Y -14.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 8.1 + 11.4 + 3.5 = 41.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Terex CorporationTEX 40.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 15.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -10.3 pp 39% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM -4.7% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 36.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.7/20 RS sector -6.4% · RS bench -7.1% · 1Y 13.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.6 + 10.8 + 9.4 + 4.7 = 40.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Lindsay CorporationLNN 39.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 12.5/35 Revenue -7.1% · PAT -27.3% · OPM change -2.5 pp 83% evidence 13.0/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 11.5% 76% evidence 7.7/20 P/E 21× · PEG 2.04 65% evidence 6.3/20 RS sector -6.7% · RS bench -7.3% · 1Y -14.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.5 + 13 + 7.7 + 6.3 = 39.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15SunScout Holding LimitedSNSC 55.7/100Thin evidence · provisional11% evidence 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence 18.2/25 ROCE 30.5% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 18.2 + 10 + 10 = 55.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16Wabash National CorporationWNC 44.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence FADING 12.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -99.9 pp 39% evidence 5.0/25 ROCE -2.7% · OPM -17.3% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 1.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.6/20 RS sector 11.6% · RS bench 10.5% · 1Y 8.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 5 + 11.3 + 15.6 = 44 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Aebi Schmidt Holding AGAEBI 38.9/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 15.6/35 Revenue 61.2% · PAT -60.9% · OPM change -2.4 pp 53% evidence 10.1/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 3.4% 57% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 80.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.4/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench -10.2% · 1Y -4.1%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.6 + 10.1 + 8.8 + 4.4 = 38.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Titan International, Inc.TWI 38.4/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.1 pp 39% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM -2.7% 76% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 16.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.0/20 RS sector -16.4% · RS bench -17.2% · 1Y -13.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.7 + 6.8 + 10.9 + 4 = 38.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19Columbus McKinnon CorporationCMCO 34.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -37 pp 39% evidence 6.0/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM -35% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 82.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.7/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -9.1% · 1Y 7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.1 + 6 + 8.7 + 5.7 = 34.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20Hyster-Yale, Inc.HY 29.3/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 8.9/35 Revenue -12.2% · PAT -175.7% · OPM change -5.8 pp 53% evidence 6.3/25 ROCE -2.8% · OPM -3.5% 57% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 263.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.6/20 RS sector -8.5% · RS bench -9% · 1Y -8.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 8.9 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 5.6 = 29.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21CEA Industries Inc.BNC 28.2/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence 10.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2254.1 pp 39% evidence 3.0/25 ROCE -43.5% · OPM -992.9% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 1.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -63.7% · RS bench -65.3% · 1Y -85.3%0 of 6 weeks ahead to 2026-08-07 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.7 + 3 + 11.5 + 3 = 28.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 21 companies
04 · what price has already done

Market action

The Manitowoc Company, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery at +109.2%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +45.2%. 6 of 20 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-09-16.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Caterpillar Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 21 Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies compared here, at $74,729 million. Deere & Company is next at $47,926 million. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has the highest Revenue growth at 61.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Caterpillar Inc. is the scale leader at $74,729 million, 55.9% ahead of Deere & Company. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's growth is 61.2% from a $1,733 million base, with 9 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderCaterpillar Inc. · $74,729 million
Gap55.9% versus #2 · Deere & Company
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/21 companies · 354 observations

Investor read: Caterpillar Inc. is the scale benchmark; Aebi Schmidt Holding AG is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Caterpillar Inc.'s growth falls below Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Caterpillar Inc. CAT$74.7B
2Deere & Company DE$47.9B
3PACCAR Inc PCAR$27.8B
4CNH Industrial N.V. CNH · older report$18.1B
5Hyster-Yale, Inc. HY · older report$3.7B
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Aebi Schmidt Holding AG AEBI · older report61%
3Astec Industries, Inc. ASTE · older report12%
4Blue Bird Corporation BLBD · older report10%
Revenue · company comparison
13/21 level · 12/21 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Caterpillar Inc. CAT$20.5B24%Jun 2026
Deere & Company DE$12.6B4.9%Sep 2026
PACCAR Inc PCAR$7.5B0.5%Jun 2026
CNH Industrial N.V. CNH$3.8B-0.1%Mar 2026
AGCO Corporation AGCO$2.3B14%Jun 2026
Oshkosh Corporation OSK$2.3B0.2%Jun 2026
Terex Corporation TEX$1.7B41%Jun 2026
Hyster-Yale, Inc. HY$795M-13%Mar 2026
Federal Signal Corporation FSS$626M35%Jun 2026
Titan International, Inc. TWI$505M2.9%Jun 2026
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. MTW$495M5.1%Mar 2026
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG AEBI$456M83%Mar 2026
Columbus McKinnon Corporation CMCO$438M77%Jun 2026
Alamo Group Inc. ALG$417M6.7%Mar 2026
Astec Industries, Inc. ASTE$396M20%Mar 2026
Blue Bird Corporation BLBD$353M-1.7%Mar 2026
Wabash National Corporation WNC$303M-20%Jun 2026
Lindsay Corporation LNN$161M-4.7%Jun 2026
Gencor Industries, Inc. GENC$34M-11%Mar 2026
CEA Industries Inc. BNC$7M0.0%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

$3.2B
$2.7B
$2.9B
$3.1B
$3.9B
$3.3B
$3.8B
$3.5B
$3.8B
$2.9B
$3.2B
$2.6B
$2.9B
$2.1B
$2.6B
$2.5B
$2.9B
$2.3B

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

$337M
$362M
$396M
$369M
$387M
$412M
$441M
$420M
$418M
$426M
$416M
$401M
$385M
$391M
$419M
$420M
$374M
$417M

Astec Industries, Inc. · ASTE

$267M
$291M
$318M
$315M
$350M
$348M
$350M
$303M
$337M
$309M
$346M
$291M
$359M
$329M
$330M
$350M
$401M
$396M

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

$192M
$129M
$208M
$206M
$258M
$300M
$294M
$318M
$346M
$333M
$350M
$314M
$359M
$398M
$409M
$333M
$353M

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

$13.8B
$13.6B
$14.2B
$15.0B
$16.6B
$15.9B
$17.3B
$16.8B
$17.1B
$15.8B
$16.7B
$16.1B
$16.2B
$14.2B
$16.6B
$17.6B
$19.1B
$17.4B
$20.5B

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

$5.5B
$4.6B
$6.1B
$5.9B
$6.9B
$5.3B
$6.6B
$6.0B
$6.8B
$4.8B
$5.5B
$4.7B
$4.9B
$3.8B
$4.7B
$4.4B
$5.2B
$3.8B

Deere & Company · DE

$11.3B
$9.6B
$13.4B
$14.1B
$15.5B
$12.7B
$17.4B
$15.8B
$15.4B
$12.2B
$15.2B
$13.2B
$11.0B
$8.5B
$12.8B
$12.0B
$12.3B
$9.6B
$13.4B
$12.6B

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

$301M
$330M
$367M
$346M
$392M
$386M
$442M
$446M
$448M
$425M
$490M
$474M
$472M
$464M
$565M
$555M
$597M
$626M

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

$166M
$200M
$214M
$190M
$176M
$166M
$165M
$167M
$161M
$152M
$139M
$155M
$166M
$187M
$169M
$154M
$156M
$158M
$161M

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

$1.8B
$1.9B
$2.1B
$2.1B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.8B
$2.7B
$2.6B
$2.3B
$2.7B
$2.7B
$2.7B
$2.3B

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

$6.7B
$6.5B
$7.2B
$7.1B
$8.1B
$8.5B
$8.9B
$8.7B
$9.1B
$8.7B
$8.8B
$8.2B
$7.9B
$7.4B
$7.5B
$6.7B
$6.8B
$6.8B
$7.5B

Terex Corporation · TEX

$990M
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.7B

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

2.3%
15%
24%
24%
30%
11%
-2.5%
-12%
-15%
-25%
-24%
-30%
-19%
-4.7%
1.1%
14%

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

14%
9.2%
15%
14%
11%
14%
8.0%
3.4%
-5.7%
-4.5%
-7.9%
-8.2%
0.7%
4.7%
-2.9%
6.7%

Astec Industries, Inc. · ASTE

14%
18%
31%
20%
10%
-3.8%
-3.7%
-11%
-1.1%
-4.0%
6.5%
6.5%
-4.6%
20%
12%
20%

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

4.6%
34%
44%
43%
23%
11%
19%
-1.3%
3.8%
20%
17%
6.1%
-1.7%

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

11%
21%
20%
17%
22%
12%
2.9%
-0.4%
-3.6%
-4.2%
-5.0%
-9.8%
-0.7%
9.5%
18%
22%
24%

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

18%
24%
27%
15%
8.0%
1.8%
-2.2%
-9.8%
-16%
-22%
-28%
-21%
-14%
-5.5%
5.8%
-0.1%

Deere & Company · DE

22%
37%
32%
30%
12%
-0.9%
-3.7%
-12%
-17%
-29%
-30%
-16%
-8.6%
13%
13%
4.8%
4.9%

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

9.6%
16%
30%
17%
20%
29%
14%
10%
11%
6.3%
5.4%
9.2%
15%
17%
26%
35%

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

23%
6.0%
-17%
-23%
-12%
-8.5%
-8.4%
-16%
-7.2%
3.1%
23%
22%
-0.7%
-6.0%
-16%
-4.7%

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

-6.5%
0.2%
23%
17%
17%
21%
12%
12%
18%
9.2%
5.3%
-9.1%
-4.0%
-1.9%
3.5%
0.2%

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

23%
37%
22%
31%
24%
23%
12%
3.2%
-1.2%
-5.2%
-13%
-15%
-14%
-19%
-14%
-8.9%
0.5%

Terex Corporation · TEX

3.7%
13%
23%
23%
30%
15%
0.4%
4.5%
-1.5%
-6.1%
1.5%
-4.9%
7.6%
14%
6.2%
41%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Caterpillar Inc. has the highest OPM among the 21 Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies compared here, at 22.2%. Federal Signal Corporation is next at 15.9%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +4.5 percentage points. 20 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Caterpillar Inc. leads both opm at 22.2% and margin change at +4.5 percentage points.

LeaderCaterpillar Inc. · 22.2%
Gap39.6% versus #2 · Federal Signal Corporation
Persistence1/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage20/21 companies · 352 observations

Investor read: Caterpillar Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
4Gencor Industries, Inc. GENC · older report13%
5PACCAR Inc PCAR12%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Caterpillar Inc. CAT+4.5 pp
2Blue Bird Corporation BLBD · older report+1.7 pp
4AGCO Corporation AGCO+1.0 pp
5PACCAR Inc PCAR+0.5 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
20/21 level · 20/21 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Caterpillar Inc. CAT22%+4.5 ppJun 2026
Federal Signal Corporation FSS16%+1.7 ppJun 2026
Deere & Company DE13%−1.7 ppSep 2026
Gencor Industries, Inc. GENC13%−4.5 ppMar 2026
PACCAR Inc PCAR12%+0.5 ppJun 2026
Lindsay Corporation LNN12%−2.5 ppJun 2026
Blue Bird Corporation BLBD11%+1.7 ppMar 2026
Alamo Group Inc. ALG10%−1.3 ppMar 2026
CNH Industrial N.V. CNH9.9%−3.8 ppMar 2026
Oshkosh Corporation OSK3.5%−4.1 ppJun 2026
AGCO Corporation AGCO3.4%+1.0 ppJun 2026
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG AEBI3.4%−2.4 ppMar 2026
Astec Industries, Inc. ASTE2.3%−3.9 ppMar 2026
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. MTW0.6%−0.5 ppMar 2026
Titan International, Inc. TWI-2.7%−5.1 ppJun 2026
Hyster-Yale, Inc. HY-3.5%−5.8 ppMar 2026
Terex Corporation TEX-4.7%−10.3 ppJun 2026
Wabash National Corporation WNC-17%−99.9 ppJun 2026
Columbus McKinnon Corporation CMCO-35%−37.0 ppJun 2026
CEA Industries Inc. BNC-993%−2,254.1 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

8.4%
7.6%
8.9%
11%
12%
12%
13%
12%
10%
9.3%
-7.4%
4.4%
-9.3%
2.4%
6.2%
6.1%
7.9%
3.4%

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

8.3%
8.0%
10%
9.7%
11%
12%
12%
12%
11%
11%
10%
10%
8.9%
11%
11%
8.9%
6.0%
10%

Astec Industries, Inc. · ASTE

-2.3%
1.4%
-0.5%
0.6%
0.9%
5.1%
4.9%
-1.7%
5.6%
2.0%
-3.1%
-2.5%
9.7%
6.2%
6.5%
0.3%
5.7%
2.3%

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

-1.3%
-1.6%
-8.0%
0.5%
-8.9%
4.2%
6.6%
12%
10%
12%
7.3%
11%
9.4%
13%
12%
11%
11%

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

18%
14%
14%
17%
20%
21%
21%
20%
19%
22%
22%
20%
19%
18%
18%
18%
16%
18%
22%

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

8.3%
13%
15%
16%
14%
17%
18%
17%
14%
17%
16%
16%
14%
14%
14%
9.8%
10%
9.9%

Deere & Company · DE

13%
13%
20%
19%
22%
20%
23%
24%
20%
19%
21%
19%
12%
11%
19%
15%
12%
9.3%
18%
13%

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

10%
8.6%
13%
11%
12%
10%
13%
14%
14%
13%
17%
16%
15%
14%
17%
17%
14%
16%

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

8.0%
9.2%
16%
15%
14%
16%
16%
14%
13%
15%
14%
8.7%
13%
17%
14%
7.4%
13%
8.3%
12%

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

2.3%
1.6%
3.7%
5.7%
6.7%
5.8%
9.7%
10%
8.7%
10%
9.2%
9.7%
8.6%
7.6%
11%
9.7%
7.9%
3.5%

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

9.4%
12%
13%
13%
14%
17%
17%
17%
17%
16%
15%
14%
13%
12%
11%
9.5%
8.8%
10%
12%

Terex Corporation · TEX

7.0%
7.4%
9.6%
11%
9.9%
12%
15%
13%
9.5%
12%
14%
10%
4.3%
5.6%
8.7%
10%
10%
-4.7%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

−1.2 pp
+1.4 pp
+3.5 pp
+4.0 pp
+4.1 pp
+1.7 pp
−1.6 pp
−2.3 pp
−20.4 pp
−7.9 pp
−19.6 pp
−6.9 pp
+13.6 pp
+1.7 pp
+17.2 pp
+1.0 pp

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

+0.6 pp
+0.8 pp
+2.7 pp
+3.9 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.2 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.8 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
−1.1 pp
−2.9 pp
−1.3 pp

Astec Industries, Inc. · ASTE

−4.2 pp
−1.8 pp
+3.2 pp
+3.7 pp
+5.4 pp
−2.3 pp
+4.7 pp
−3.1 pp
−8.0 pp
−0.8 pp
+4.1 pp
+4.2 pp
+9.6 pp
+2.8 pp
−4.0 pp
−3.9 pp

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

−3.6 pp
−7.6 pp
+12.2 pp
+6.1 pp
+20.8 pp
+7.7 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.7 pp
+5.0 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.7 pp

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

+0.3 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.5 pp
+6.5 pp
+6.8 pp
+3.7 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.4 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
−3.8 pp
−4.7 pp
−2.2 pp
−3.2 pp
−0.2 pp
+4.5 pp

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

+2.3 pp
+1.9 pp
+5.7 pp
+3.6 pp
+2.7 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.8 pp
−2.8 pp
−2.4 pp
−6.1 pp
−3.6 pp
−3.8 pp

Deere & Company · DE

−2.1 pp
+8.9 pp
+7.2 pp
+3.7 pp
+5.0 pp
−2.5 pp
−1.5 pp
−2.5 pp
−4.8 pp
−7.4 pp
−7.2 pp
−2.2 pp
−3.8 pp
0.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.7 pp

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

+1.1 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.8 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.6 pp
+3.1 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.9 pp
+1.7 pp

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

+8.5 pp
+6.0 pp
+7.2 pp
0.0 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.8 pp
−2.1 pp
−5.3 pp
−0.5 pp
+2.6 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.3 pp
0.0 pp
−8.9 pp
−2.5 pp

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

−5.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+4.4 pp
+4.2 pp
+6.0 pp
+4.5 pp
+2.0 pp
+4.4 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
−2.6 pp
+1.5 pp
0.0 pp
−0.7 pp
−4.1 pp

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

+1.9 pp
+3.9 pp
+4.4 pp
+5.6 pp
+4.3 pp
+4.1 pp
+2.9 pp
−0.8 pp
−1.5 pp
−3.6 pp
−4.0 pp
−4.4 pp
−4.1 pp
−4.1 pp
−3.9 pp
−1.9 pp
+0.5 pp

Terex Corporation · TEX

−2.2 pp
+3.3 pp
+2.9 pp
+4.6 pp
+5.4 pp
+1.8 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.0 pp
−2.5 pp
−5.2 pp
−6.6 pp
−5.3 pp
0.0 pp
+6.1 pp
−10.3 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Caterpillar Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 21 Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies compared here, at $10,844 million. Deere & Company is next at $4,873 million. Astec Industries, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at 73.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Caterpillar Inc. leads with $10,844 million of TTM profit, 122.5% above Deere & Company. Astec Industries, Inc. shows 73.3% growth from a $26 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderCaterpillar Inc. · $10,844 million
Gap122.5% versus #2 · Deere & Company
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/21 companies · 354 observations

Investor read: Caterpillar Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Caterpillar Inc. CAT$10.8B
3PACCAR Inc PCAR$2.5B
4CNH Industrial N.V. CNH · older report$383M
5Blue Bird Corporation BLBD · older report$132M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Astec Industries, Inc. ASTE · older report73%
2Blue Bird Corporation BLBD · older report21%
5Gencor Industries, Inc. GENC · older report-7.1%
Net profit · company comparison
13/21 level · 11/21 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Caterpillar Inc. CAT$3.6B65%Jun 2026
Deere & Company DE$1.4B7.0%Sep 2026
PACCAR Inc PCAR$752M3.9%Jun 2026
Federal Signal Corporation FSS$70M52%Jun 2026
AGCO Corporation AGCO$52M478%Jun 2026
Oshkosh Corporation OSK$44M-61%Jun 2026
Alamo Group Inc. ALG$29M-9.4%Mar 2026
Blue Bird Corporation BLBD$29M12%Mar 2026
Lindsay Corporation LNN$16M-20%Jun 2026
CNH Industrial N.V. CNH$10M-92%Mar 2026
Gencor Industries, Inc. GENC$4M-33%Mar 2026
Astec Industries, Inc. ASTE$1M-93%Mar 2026
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG AEBI$1M-50%Mar 2026
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. MTW$-6M-88%Mar 2026
Titan International, Inc. TWI$-24M-5,600%Jun 2026
Hyster-Yale, Inc. HY$-30M-433%Mar 2026
Wabash National Corporation WNC$-45M-119%Jun 2026
CEA Industries Inc. BNC$-56M-10,800%Jun 2026
Terex Corporation TEX$-93M-543%Jun 2026
Columbus McKinnon Corporation CMCO$-238M50%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

$283M
$137M
$178M
$238M
$322M
$233M
$319M
$281M
$263M
$168M
$-369M
$29M
$-314M
$9M
$314M
$303M
$93M
$52M

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

$19M
$18M
$28M
$26M
$29M
$33M
$36M
$35M
$32M
$32M
$28M
$27M
$28M
$32M
$31M
$25M
$16M
$29M

Astec Industries, Inc. · ASTE

$-10M
$4M
$-4M
$1M
$-1M
$12M
$13M
$-7M
$15M
$3M
$-14M
$-6M
$21M
$14M
$17M
$-4M
$12M
$1M

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

$-2M
$-4M
$-12M
$-6M
$-23M
$7M
$9M
$26M
$26M
$29M
$25M
$29M
$26M
$36M
$36M
$31M
$29M

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

$2.1B
$1.5B
$1.7B
$2.0B
$1.5B
$1.9B
$2.9B
$2.8B
$2.7B
$2.9B
$2.7B
$2.5B
$2.8B
$2.0B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.5B
$3.6B

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

$307M
$336M
$552M
$559M
$592M
$486M
$710M
$540M
$583M
$369M
$404M
$310M
$176M
$132M
$217M
$67M
$89M
$10M

Deere & Company · DE

$1.3B
$903M
$2.1B
$1.9B
$2.2B
$2.0B
$2.9B
$3.0B
$2.4B
$1.8B
$2.4B
$1.7B
$1.2B
$869M
$1.8B
$1.3B
$1.1B
$656M
$1.8B
$1.4B

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

$20M
$21M
$34M
$32M
$35M
$27M
$40M
$43M
$46M
$50M
$61M
$54M
$50M
$46M
$71M
$68M
$61M
$70M

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

$8M
$15M
$25M
$18M
$18M
$18M
$17M
$19M
$15M
$18M
$20M
$13M
$17M
$27M
$20M
$11M
$17M
$12M
$16M

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

$23M
$1M
$34M
$67M
$76M
$95M
$175M
$186M
$151M
$182M
$176M
$182M
$154M
$114M
$206M
$197M
$134M
$44M

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

$519M
$601M
$720M
$769M
$921M
$734M
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$972M
$872M
$505M
$724M
$590M
$557M
$605M
$752M

Terex Corporation · TEX

$58M
$65M
$93M
$108M
$108M
$135M
$196M
$148M
$102M
$147M
$174M
$112M
$12M
$21M
$89M
$98M
$97M
$-93M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

-37%
31%
14%
70%
79%
18%
-18%
-28%
-216%
-90%
-219%
-95%
945%
478%

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

7.7%
44%
53%
83%
29%
35%
10%
-3.0%
-22%
-23%
-13%
0.0%
11%
-7.4%
-43%
-9.4%

Astec Industries, Inc. · ASTE

-150%
-89%
200%
-800%
-75%
-208%
40%
367%
-43%
-93%

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

-250%
314%
178%
12%
0.0%
24%
44%
6.9%
12%

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

20%
43%
-31%
26%
75%
37%
84%
47%
-8.3%
-12%
4.3%
-30%
-19%
-6.7%
-14%
27%
65%

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

-2.5%
70%
93%
45%
29%
-3.4%
-1.5%
-24%
-43%
-43%
-70%
-64%
-46%
-78%
-49%
-92%

Deere & Company · DE

13%
75%
117%
36%
58%
5.5%
-11%
-17%
-42%
-47%
-50%
-24%
-26%
-14%
-25%
-1.7%
7.0%

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

13%
10%
75%
29%
18%
34%
31%
85%
53%
26%
8.7%
-8.0%
16%
26%
22%
52%

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

200%
125%
20%
-32%
5.6%
-17%
0.0%
18%
-32%
13%
50%
0.0%
-15%
0.0%
-56%
-20%

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

-84%
-25%
230%
9,400%
415%
178%
99%
92%
0.6%
-2.2%
2.0%
-37%
17%
8.2%
-13%
-61%

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

45%
102%
77%
22%
70%
60%
54%
63%
-8.0%
-21%
-38%
-58%
-36%
-39%
-36%
20%
3.9%

Terex Corporation · TEX

8.1%
71%
86%
108%
111%
37%
-5.6%
8.9%
-11%
-24%
-88%
-86%
-49%
-13%
708%
-543%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

SunScout Holding Limited has the highest ROCE among the 21 Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies compared here, at 30.5%. Caterpillar Inc. is next at 22.2%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +14.6 percentage points. 21 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: SunScout Holding Limited leads ROCE at 30.5%, 8.3 percentage points above Caterpillar Inc.. SunScout Holding Limited has the strongest latest improvement at +14.6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderSunScout Holding Limited · 30.5%
Gap37.4% versus #2 · Caterpillar Inc.
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage21/21 companies · 360 observations

Investor read: SunScout Holding Limited sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
3Blue Bird Corporation BLBD · older report10%
ROCE changefastest improvers
2Caterpillar Inc. CAT+0.8 pp
4Deere & Company DE+0.1 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
21/21 level · 21/21 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Caterpillar Inc. CAT22%+0.8 ppJun 2026
Blue Bird Corporation BLBD10%−1.8 ppMar 2026
Deere & Company DE9.1%+0.1 ppSep 2026
Federal Signal Corporation FSS6.3%+0.1 ppJun 2026
Oshkosh Corporation OSK3.4%−0.9 ppJun 2026
Alamo Group Inc. ALG3.0%−0.4 ppMar 2026
Terex Corporation TEX2.8%−0.6 ppJun 2026
PACCAR Inc PCAR2.7%0.0 ppJun 2026
Lindsay Corporation LNN2.7%−0.9 ppJun 2026
Gencor Industries, Inc. GENC2.0%−1.2 ppMar 2026
AGCO Corporation AGCO1.7%−0.1 ppJun 2026
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG AEBI1.3%−2.1 ppMar 2026
Titan International, Inc. TWI1.1%+0.3 ppJun 2026
CNH Industrial N.V. CNH1.0%−0.3 ppMar 2026
Astec Industries, Inc. ASTE1.0%−1.6 ppMar 2026
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. MTW0.2%−0.2 ppMar 2026
Columbus McKinnon Corporation CMCO-0.6%−1.0 ppJun 2026
Wabash National Corporation WNC-2.7%−2.2 ppJun 2026
Hyster-Yale, Inc. HY-2.8%−5.0 ppMar 2026
CEA Industries Inc. BNC-44%−43.5 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

4.9%
3.6%
4.6%
5.7%
7.9%
5.8%
7.4%
6.3%
6.0%
3.4%
-3.0%
1.4%
-3.7%
0.6%
1.8%
1.7%
3.0%
1.0%
1.7%

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

2.8%
2.7%
3.8%
3.3%
4.0%
4.1%
4.6%
4.2%
3.9%
3.7%
3.4%
3.2%
2.8%
3.4%
3.6%
2.8%
1.7%
3.0%

Astec Industries, Inc. · ASTE

-0.9%
0.6%
-0.2%
0.3%
0.5%
2.5%
2.4%
-0.7%
2.5%
0.8%
-1.4%
-0.9%
4.5%
2.6%
2.7%
0.1%
2.5%
1.0%

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

-1.1%
-0.9%
-8.0%
0.5%
-11%
6.3%
8.7%
19%
18%
18%
11%
12%
12%
16%
15%
11%
10%

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

16%
16%
16%
18%
19%
21%
25%
26%
26%
27%
28%
25%
24%
24%
21%
20%
19%
21%
22%

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

1.1%
1.8%
2.7%
2.6%
2.5%
2.7%
3.4%
2.8%
2.6%
2.0%
2.2%
1.8%
1.6%
1.3%
1.6%
1.0%
1.3%
1.0%

Deere & Company · DE

14%
13%
14%
15%
17%
19%
21%
21%
21%
20%
18%
16%
13%
12%
10%
9.0%
9.3%
9.4%
9.1%
9.1%

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

2.7%
2.4%
3.9%
3.2%
3.7%
3.0%
4.4%
4.6%
4.6%
3.8%
5.5%
5.1%
4.8%
4.3%
6.2%
5.9%
4.6%
5.3%
6.3%

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

2.7%
3.7%
6.8%
5.3%
4.6%
5.0%
4.8%
4.0%
3.6%
3.6%
3.3%
2.2%
3.3%
4.9%
3.6%
1.7%
3.0%
1.9%
2.7%

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

0.9%
0.7%
1.7%
2.4%
2.9%
2.6%
4.6%
4.9%
3.8%
4.5%
4.4%
4.4%
3.6%
2.7%
4.3%
3.8%
3.1%
1.2%
3.4%

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

3.0%
3.5%
4.2%
4.3%
5.0%
6.3%
6.2%
6.1%
6.0%
5.3%
4.8%
3.9%
3.5%
3.0%
2.7%
2.0%
1.9%
2.1%
2.7%

Terex Corporation · TEX

3.3%
3.6%
5.0%
5.8%
5.9%
6.9%
9.6%
7.4%
5.0%
6.5%
7.7%
4.7%
1.5%
1.9%
3.4%
3.6%
2.9%
-1.2%
2.8%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

+3.0 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.8 pp
+0.6 pp
−1.9 pp
−2.4 pp
−10.4 pp
−4.9 pp
−9.7 pp
−2.8 pp
+4.8 pp
+0.3 pp
+6.7 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.1 pp

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

+1.2 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.2 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.4 pp

Astec Industries, Inc. · ASTE

+1.4 pp
+1.9 pp
+2.6 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
−1.7 pp
−3.8 pp
−0.2 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.8 pp
+4.1 pp
+1.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.6 pp

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

−9.6 pp
+14.3 pp
+8.2 pp
+29.2 pp
+11.6 pp
+2.0 pp
−6.5 pp
−5.7 pp
−1.7 pp
+4.2 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.8 pp

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

+3.8 pp
+5.8 pp
+9.5 pp
+7.8 pp
+6.5 pp
+5.6 pp
+2.7 pp
−0.1 pp
−1.5 pp
−2.8 pp
−6.7 pp
−5.0 pp
−5.5 pp
−3.6 pp
+0.8 pp

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

+1.4 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.2 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp

Deere & Company · DE

+3.4 pp
+5.4 pp
+6.8 pp
+6.7 pp
+3.7 pp
+1.3 pp
−2.2 pp
−5.3 pp
−7.7 pp
−8.5 pp
−8.1 pp
−7.0 pp
−4.1 pp
−2.2 pp
−1.2 pp
+0.1 pp

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

+1.0 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.1 pp

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

+1.9 pp
+1.3 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.3 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
−3.0 pp
−0.9 pp

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

+2.0 pp
+1.9 pp
+2.9 pp
+2.5 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.9 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.5 pp
−0.9 pp

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

+2.0 pp
+2.8 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.4 pp
−2.2 pp
−2.5 pp
−2.3 pp
−2.1 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.6 pp
−0.9 pp
0.0 pp

Terex Corporation · TEX

+2.6 pp
+3.3 pp
+4.6 pp
+1.6 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.9 pp
−2.7 pp
−3.5 pp
−4.6 pp
−4.3 pp
−1.1 pp
+1.4 pp
−3.1 pp
−0.6 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

The Manitowoc Company, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 21 Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies compared here, at 0.14×. CNH Industrial N.V. is next at 0.46×. CEA Industries Inc. has the lowest P/E at 1.23×, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 21 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: The Manitowoc Company, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.14×, 69.6% below CNH Industrial N.V.. Only 10 of 21 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderThe Manitowoc Company, Inc. · 0.14×
Gap69.6% versus #2 · CNH Industrial N.V.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage10/21 companies · 70 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1The Manitowoc Company, Inc. MTW · older report0.1
2CNH Industrial N.V. CNH · older report0.5
3Blue Bird Corporation BLBD · older report0.5
5Astec Industries, Inc. ASTE · older report1.0
P/Elowest P/E
3Blue Bird Corporation BLBD · older report13.5
Valuation · company comparison
10/21 level · 20/21 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Columbus McKinnon Corporation CMCO4.182.1Jun 2026
Caterpillar Inc. CAT2.545.2Jun 2026
Lindsay Corporation LNN2.021.0Jun 2026
PACCAR Inc PCAR1.525.2Jun 2026
Alamo Group Inc. ALG1.419.7Mar 2026
Gencor Industries, Inc. GENC1.317.1Mar 2026
Deere & Company DE1.032.8Sep 2026
Federal Signal Corporation FSS0.927.7Jun 2026
Oshkosh Corporation OSK0.717.6Jun 2026
Terex Corporation TEX0.736.9Jun 2026
AGCO Corporation AGCO0.616.6Jun 2026
Hyster-Yale, Inc. HY0.6263.3Mar 2026
Blue Bird Corporation BLBD0.513.5Mar 2026
CNH Industrial N.V. CNH0.535.5Mar 2026
Titan International, Inc. TWI0.416.8Jun 2026
Wabash National Corporation WNC0.21.7Jun 2026
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. MTW0.158.3Mar 2026
Astec Industries, Inc. ASTE48.1Mar 2026
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG AEBI80.9Mar 2026
CEA Industries Inc. BNC1.2Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 17 companies with a series here. The remaining 5 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

1.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.6

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

0.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
1.4

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

0.2
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.5

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

1.2
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.8
1.7
2.5

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5

Deere & Company · DE

0.2
0.2
0.4
1.0

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

0.9
0.9
0.6
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.7
1.4
3.3
2.8
1.9
0.9

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

0.6
1.9
1.6
3.6
1.6
2.0

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

0.3
0.7

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
1.5

Terex Corporation · TEX

0.2
0.7

The Manitowoc Company, Inc. · MTW

0.1

P/E · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

AGCO Corporation · AGCO

9.8
12.3
9.4
8.5
11.7
10.5
8.9
7.7
7.8
8.3
17.5
43.3
77.0
21.3
10.7
11.2
16.6

Alamo Group Inc. · ALG

21.8
21.1
16.6
15.8
16.6
18.8
17.7
15.5
18.5
20.3
16.4
18.1
19.3
18.6
22.2
19.8
19.5
19.7

Astec Industries, Inc. · ASTE

100.4
87.8
117.9
41.3
60.4
25.3
40.1
176.8
52.2
21.0
23.1
25.8
48.1

Blue Bird Corporation · BLBD

28.9
14.2
15.5
17.8
15.3
12.2
10.2
12.3
14.9
12.8
13.5

Caterpillar Inc. · CAT

17.2
18.4
14.1
11.8
18.6
16.6
15.2
15.3
14.6
16.3
14.8
17.8
16.2
15.9
19.4
24.1
30.2
35.0
45.2

CNH Industrial N.V. · CNH

15.3
14.3
10.5
8.8
10.8
9.6
8.4
7.1
7.2
7.9
7.0
8.6
12.7
15.4
19.9
23.1
23.6
35.5

Deere & Company · DE

17.8
20.4
19.5
17.0
16.8
15.2
12.5
12.5
10.2
11.1
11.6
13.0
15.7
21.0
22.1
26.9
24.8
29.7
32.6
32.8

Federal Signal Corporation · FSS

26.6
21.1
21.3
21.7
23.6
25.9
29.1
25.0
30.0
28.7
25.4
27.1
26.4
21.5
29.6
31.1
27.1
24.6
27.7

Lindsay Corporation · LNN

36.9
31.4
26.0
27.0
25.7
21.0
18.3
19.0
19.1
19.0
17.4
20.6
21.3
18.8
20.0
20.2
17.0
24.7
21.0

Oshkosh Corporation · OSK

16.9
21.0
38.0
38.0
33.5
20.9
14.0
12.0
11.9
11.9
10.5
9.7
9.2
10.1
11.4
12.7
12.5
16.4
17.6

PACCAR Inc · PCAR

16.5
15.4
13.0
11.2
11.5
12.2
12.0
10.9
11.2
12.9
10.9
11.7
13.2
16.0
17.8
19.2
24.3
24.6
25.2

Terex Corporation · TEX

14.1
10.9
8.3
7.7
9.9
9.2
9.2
8.1
7.6
8.5
7.5
7.7
9.3
10.3
17.4
21.8
16.0
28.3
36.9
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 8 of the 21 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 8 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 21 Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 2026-09-16.

FundamentalsThrough Sep 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-16 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 21 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-16. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery sector outperforming S&P 500?

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery has underperformed S&P 500 by 4% over 52 weeks and 1.9% over 13 weeks. 6 of 20 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 6 of 20 beat the sector itself.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company is largest by revenue?

Caterpillar Inc. leads with revenue of $74,729 million, based on 13 of 21 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company is growing fastest?

Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has the fastest current revenue growth at 61.2%, across 12 of 21 comparable companies.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Deere & Company ranks first at 66.4/100 with 85.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company has the lowest comparable PEG?

The Manitowoc Company, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.14, among 10 of 21 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company is the biggest?

Caterpillar Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $74,729 million, ahead of Deere & Company at $47,926 million. That covers 13 of 21 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company has the best profit margins?

Caterpillar Inc. has the highest operating margin at 22.2%, from 20 of 21 comparable companies. Caterpillar Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +4.5 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company makes the most profit?

Caterpillar Inc. earns the most, at $10,844 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 13 of 21 comparable companies. Astec Industries, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 73.3%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company earns the highest return on capital?

SunScout Holding Limited leads on return on capital employed at 30.5%, across 21 of 21 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — The Manitowoc Company, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.14×. Only 10 of 21 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery sector beating the market?

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery has underperformed S&P 500 by 4% over the last 52 weeks and 1.9% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 6 of 20 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery stock has the strongest price momentum?

The Manitowoc Company, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company scores highest for research priority?

Deere & Company scores 66.4 out of 100 with 85.3% evidence confidence, from 19.8 points on growth and earnings, 15.9 on capital efficiency, 12.5 on valuation and 18.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 21 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery sector?

The 21 Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies on this page carry $660,632 million of combined market value. Caterpillar Inc. is the largest at $359,797 million, about 54% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-16.

What is the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 21 Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies on this page is 27.7×, measured on the 20 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-09-16.

How is the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery sector performing?

6 of the 20 covered Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 4% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-16.

How many Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 21 listed Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI