TBO Tek Ltd
TBOTEKTBO Tek Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: Foreign institutions moved −13.9 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (7 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 39th percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +31.7% year on year, and 73% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
TBO Tek Ltd trades at ₹1,680, in a confirmed uptrend and 7 weeks into that stage. That is +14.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 95% of a 52-week range of ₹1,068 to ₹1,710. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 18 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 7 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹1,680 it trades +14.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 95% of its 52-week range (₹1,068–₹1,710).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 2.3 years the stock moved +15% while the NIFTY 500 moved +8% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 18 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Story check
TBO Tek Ltd's story is not scored yet against the markers our research file set on 22 August 2026. Where it sits in its own cycle: Not stated in the research file. Our fortnightly research layers last read it on 22 August 2026.
Our read, 22 August 2026. Asset-light B2B travel platform connecting 150,000+ agencies to global hotel and flight inventory; the fixed-cost base is deployed and operating leverage is loading, but four management credibility reversals in nine months and Middle East disruption cloud the timing of the earnings step-up.
From the numbers. PE at 35th percentile of a 10-year history that began at 107x and has compressed to 68.5x over nine quarters — entirely earnings-driven (EPS grew from the IPO base while the multiple contracted). The cycle is in the…
From the price. Price stage 2, week 7 — above its 200-day line, relative strength rising.
From the research. Asset-light B2B travel platform connecting 150,000+ agencies to global hotel and flight inventory; the fixed-cost base is deployed and operating leverage is loading, but four management credibility reversals in nine…
🚨 Where they disagree. PE at 35th percentile of a 10-year history that began at 107x and has compressed to 68.5x over nine quarters — entirely earnings-driven (EPS grew from the IPO base while the multiple contracted). The cycle is in the EXPANSION_STARTED segment: below-median PE (current 65.9x vs median 74x), with quarterly momentum improving. The stock sits 11% off its 52-week peak. Two cycle bonuses fire: earnings-driven breakout and the first stage-2 grace period. The cycle-position score is 8 but halved in weight because the absolute PE of 68.5x is not cheap — the cheapness is relative to the stock's own history, not to the market.
What is proven. Asset-light B2B travel platform connecting 150,000+ agencies to global hotel and flight inventory; the fixed-cost base is deployed and operating leverage is loading, but four management credibility reversals in nine months and Middle East disruption cloud the timing of the earnings step-up.
What is not proven yet. If the Classic Vacations platform migration is not complete by March 2027 — one quarter beyond the stated December 2026 target — or if GP-to-EBITDA conversion declines sequentially for two quarters despite management guidance of improvement, the integration thesis stalls and the PE premium above 55x is unsupported. A fifth management commitment reversal on any forward guidance line would also be terminal for conviction — the pattern, not any single miss, is the kill switch.
🚨 What would change our mind. If the Classic Vacations platform migration is not complete by March 2027 — one quarter beyond the stated December 2026 target — or if GP-to-EBITDA conversion declines sequentially for two quarters despite management guidance of improvement, the integration thesis stalls and the PE premium above 55x is unsupported. A fifth management commitment reversal on any forward guidance line would also be terminal for conviction — the pattern, not any single miss, is the kill switch.
Layer 1 read, 22 August 2026 — KEEP. Cheap versus its own history and the price has not run — but the growth was bought with debt, and cash went negative. TBO's revenue nearly tripled over three years to Rs926 crore a quarter while earnings per share rose only 42% to Rs7.68, because management's own disclosure is that organic growth was just 15% in constant currency and the rest is the Classic Vacations acquisition, a business earning about 2.5% of bookings against the platform's own 10-11% and paid for with borrowings that went from Rs214 crore to Rs756 crore. The genuine positive is that the cost base is now built and stops growing — running costs rose 4% while gross profit grew in double digits, and gross-profit-to-operating-profit conversion is at 26% and improving. The two things that hold me back are that last year's operating cash flow…
What would change Layer 1’s mind. Half-year FY27 operating cash flow still negative, or full-year cash-to-profit tracking below 0.7, while gross-profit-to-operating-profit conversion fails to hold above 26% — that combination would mean the FY26 cash reversal was structural rather than the timing effect management described, and the operating-leverage step-up the whole valuation rests on is not arriving. The timeline names a fifth commitment reversal as its kill switch; I would treat the cash line as the earlier and harder…
Layer 2 read, 22 August 2026 — BENCH. TBO's sector is improving, but acquisition-heavy growth and weak cash do not clear admission. TBO's organic business grew 15% and Europe grew 24%, while operating leverage reached 26% conversion. The external sector turn helps, but the sector also records no Middle East recovery timetable and broad management credibility weakness. FY26 operating cash flow of minus Rs21 crore and four reversals make BENCH the safer P2 verdict.
What would change Layer 2’s mind. Promote BENCH to ADVANCE if the next result shows Middle East constant-currency growth above zero, organic growth at least matching the current 15%, and positive operating cash flow with a disclosed working-capital bridge.
🚨 What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: Operating cash flow negative in FY26 = business consuming cash from operations; quality concern The research reads it further: Working capital absorbed 351 crore in FY26 as the absolute receivable base grew with revenue (+54% YoY), even though debtor days improved from 853 to 724. The cash decomposition shows four specific temporary items: Brazil payment anticipation wind-down (receivables collecting through Q2 FY27), Middle East war-related trade receivable delays, year-end performance bonus accruals, and Eid holiday timing. Management has explicitly enumerated these on the May 2026 call and committed to normalization above 100% CFO-to-PAT by end-FY27. The three-year aggregate of 0.73 confirms the model generates cash in normal years.
🚨 What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: ROCE at 18% falling from 53% = business deteriorating operationally The research reads it further: Operating profit grew from 189 crore (FY23) to 378 crore (FY26) — doubling over the period. Capital employed (borrowings + equity = total assets minus current liabilities) expanded approximately 5-6x from the Classic acquisition and IPO proceeds sitting in treasury. The ROCE collapse is denominator-driven, not numerator-driven. ROCE in FY22 was also 18% when capital employed was small before scale built — the pattern is repeated IPO-to-scale transitions.
Sources: our stock research file (22 August 2026) · quarterly results through Jun 26 · the company’s own earnings calls. The story check is re-scored every results season; the record below never changes.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
TBO Tek Ltd reported ₹926 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +81.2% year on year. That is the 10th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 8 years it has compounded at 29.3% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,677 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹3,092 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,677 Cr (+54.1% on the year), capping 8 years at 29.3% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹926 Cr, +81.2% year on year — the 10th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +68.8% growth against the decade's 29.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +69.0% over the last 4 quarters against +45.2%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +14.2% vs +11.3%/yr — stabilising.
FY26-Q4. revenue ₹814 Cr and profit ₹60 Cr as reported.
FY27-Q1. revenue ₹926 Cr and profit ₹83 Cr as reported.
Why-sources: our stock research file (22 August 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
TBO Tek Ltd's operating margin is 15.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 9 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −15.0% to 19.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
Why this happened. The operating-leverage catapult applies here: fixed infrastructure costs (technology platform, CRM, business services) were built during the investment phase; the incremental volume now drops to margin at a high rate. GP-to-EBITDA conversion was 26.0% in Q1 FY27 and management confirmed improvement ahead because SG&A grows slower than gross profit. Organic SG&A grew approximately 4.0% year-on-year in constant currency in Q1 FY27 — the gap to double-digit GP growth is the margin channel. Hosting and bandwidth costs fell 14% after infrastructure insourcing and management described this as a permanent new baseline. This model captures operating leverage even as the Middle East headwind…
The latest quarter's operating margin is 15.0%, +1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 9 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −15.0%–19.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +0.4 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
FY26-Q4. revenue ₹814 Cr and profit ₹60 Cr as reported.
FY27-Q1. revenue ₹926 Cr and profit ₹83 Cr as reported.
Why-sources: our stock research file (22 August 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
TBO Tek Ltd earned ₹83.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +31.7% year on year. It is the 6th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹244 Cr. The 8-year compound rate is 27.0%. That is 9.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹63.0 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹83.0 Cr, +31.7% year on year — the 6th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹244 Cr (+6.1%), and the 8-year compound rate is 27.0%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +81.2% and the margin +1.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +13.7% vs revenue +68.8%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
FY26-Q4. revenue ₹814 Cr and profit ₹60 Cr as reported.
FY27-Q1. revenue ₹926 Cr and profit ₹83 Cr as reported.
Why-sources: our stock research file (22 August 2026) and the company’s own results for those quarters.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 73% of TBO Tek Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — most of the profit is real cash. In FY26 that was ₹−21.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹244 Cr of profit. After ₹1,335 Cr of capital spending, ₹−1,356 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹−21.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹244 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−1,356 Cr after ₹1,335 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 73% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 73%: the cash cycle stretched 415 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.
Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 415 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
TBO Tek Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 724 days in FY26, up from 309 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹1,671 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,677 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹7.3 Cr, so roughly ₹5,310 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 724 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 724 days, looser than FY21's 309.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,677 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹7.3 Cr — so the 724-day loop keeps roughly ₹5,310 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹1,671 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹174 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹14.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
TBO Tek Ltd earns a ROCE of 18% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 1% in FY21. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +19.1 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 9.1% net margin on 0.29× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 18%, recovered from a FY21 trough of 1% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 9.1% net margin × 0.29× asset turns × 6.00× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 15.8% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 31.1% − 12.0% = a +19.1 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
TBO Tek Ltd carries total debt of ₹756 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,551 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.49. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.27 in FY22 to 0.49 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Why this happened. Classic Vacations, acquired October 2025, extended the platform into North American luxury travel. North America is now almost a quarter of hotel GTV. The integration has three sequential workstreams: sales coverage expansion (described as mostly complete as of Q1 FY27), CRM and back-office automation (underway), and platform migration (targeted by end of calendar year 2026). Reverse cross-sell from Classic advisors to TBO inventory cannot begin until migration completes — management now expects contribution in early 2027, reversing the prior guidance that cross-sell would begin before migration. Classic's full-year EBITDA margin is approximately 2.5% versus TBO's organic 25-26%…
Mar 26: total debt of ₹756 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,551 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.49. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.27 (FY22) to 0.49 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions added 14.5 points of TBO Tek Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 21.1% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −13.9 points over the same window, to 28.9%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: +14.5 points over 8 quarters to 21.1%; Foreign institutions: −13.9 points over 8 quarters to 28.9%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 44.4%.
Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −13.9 points against domestic institutions +14.5 points over 8 quarters, with promoters holding steady — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
TBO Tek Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
TBO Tek Ltd trades at 67.8× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (39th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 72.9×, measured across 2.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 67.8× is mid-range by its own standards (39th percentile), against a long-run median of 72.9× measured over 2.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +6.3% against a +8.0% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.
Solved at its 25 August 2026 price, TBO Tek Ltd was paying for profit growth of about 32.6% a year. Profit itself has compounded 27.0% a year over the past 8 years. Today the market pays 67.8× P/E, the 39th percentile of its own 2-year range.
What the two numbers say together. The multiple is unremarkable against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is above what this company has actually delivered.
How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 25 August 2026, not a running figure — every other number on this page, the multiple included, is read off the live quote as of 11 September 2026. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements.
Stage: Consistent Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
TBO Tek Ltd reads as consistent on its fundamental arc. Consistent — revenue and profit growth have stayed positive through the window, with ROCE at 18.6% and holding. The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: steady curves with healthy returns are the compounding setup — the risk is the price, not the business.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +54.1% | +36.0% | +79.9% | — |
| Profit | +6.1% | +18.1% | — | — |
| EPS | +6.3% | +17.6% | — | — |
| Share price | +8.0% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
45.9/100 — rank 10 of 13 in E-Commerce - Platform - Utility · 87% evidence confidence
TBO Tek Ltd scores 45.9 out of 100 against the 13 companies it is compared with in E-Commerce - Platform - Utility, ranking 10. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17 + 14.1 + 4.3 + 10.5 = 45.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Said versus delivered
What TBO Tek Ltd's management promised, set against what actually arrived — 4 tracked promises on the record. Read straight from the company’s own earnings calls. A promise that slipped stays on this page after it is met.
🚨 Classic Vacations Cross-Sell Timeline Reversed · 30 July 2026. In February 2026, management said cross-sell between the two platforms would begin before the two-to-three-quarter platform migration was complete. In July 2026, management said the Classic-to-TBO flow had not started and could not begin until migration, with contribution only expected probably early next year, representing an unexplained reversal in sequencing and a material delay to the acquisition synergy timeline.
🚨 AI Advisory Product Confidence Downgraded · 30 July 2026. In February 2026, management described the AI advisory tool as having come out well and as an important adjacency that could support complex itinerary growth. In July 2026, management characterized the tool as very experimental, with only a few bookings and no frontline impact, without explaining the material reduction in confidence or strategic importance.
Abandonment of Accounting Standardization · 11 February 2026. In the November 2025 call, management explicitly stated they were working to convert Classic Vacations' reporting from a 'time of travel' basis to TBO's standard 'time of booking' basis for upcoming quarters. In the February 2026 call, they completely reversed this position, stating that aligning the standards is 'simply not possible' due to business complexity and they will continue running Classic on an 'as-is' basis. Earlier call (Nov 2025): “We are working on to arrive the numbers that we would be reporting in the subsequent quarters based on our accounting policy... There would be some change in the way that historically Classic has been reporting the numbers.” Later call (Feb 2026): “Pratik, we tried that, but it is simply not possible... We will continue to run the business on an as-is basis rather than trying to force-fit it into our business model.”
Contradiction on Hedging Policy · 11 February 2026. During the November 2025 call, management described their hedging policy as an existing, active process covering 70-75% of exposure where payables and receivables differ. However, in the February 2026 call, management claimed that 'material hedging' was a practice only started *after* Q4, implying the previous protection mechanisms were either insignificant or not yet implemented despite the prior assurance. Earlier call (Nov 2025): “Regarding hedging, where we have differences in payments and collections in currencies like INR, Euro, or GBP, we try to hedge 70-75% of that amount.” Later call (Feb 2026): “Any material hedging, especially for our international business, is a practice we started after Q4.”
Every quote above is taken word for word from the company’s own earnings calls.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Creative Newtech LtdCNL | 70.7/100Favorable setup87% evidence | LEADER | 28.2/35 Revenue 49.2% · PAT 37% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 5% 95% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 29.6% · RS bench 51.2% · 1Y 75.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28.2 + 12.2 + 10.3 + 20 = 70.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2MPS LtdMPSLTD | 64.5/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.7/35 Revenue 10% · PAT 19% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence | 22.0/25 ROCE 38.7% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 24.4× · PEG 0.43 100% evidence | 8.9/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench 31.1% · 1Y 16.1%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 22 + 12.9 + 8.9 = 64.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3MSTC LtdMSTCLTD | 58.3/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.8/35 Revenue 21% · PAT -42.9% · OPM change 5 pp 95% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 30.3% · OPM 61% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 22.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench 42.9% · 1Y 47.5%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 20.1 + 9.1 + 10.3 = 58.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4RNFI Services LtdRNFI | 58.3/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | TURNING | 19.7/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT 34.1% · OPM change -0.8 pp 95% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 27.3% · OPM 3.9% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector 2.6% · RS bench 14.8% · 1Y 12.4%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 16.1 + 10.1 + 12.4 = 58.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Macfos Ltd543787 | 56.8/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | FADING | 16.8/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT 43.1% · OPM change -1.9 pp 95% evidence | 18.5/25 ROCE 34.2% · OPM 10.6% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 43.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector 5.2% · RS bench 24.6% · 1Y 64.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 18.5 + 9.9 + 11.6 = 56.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Indiamart Intermesh LtdINDIAMART | 55.4/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.9/35 Revenue 12.7% · PAT -16.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 19.8/25 ROCE 28% · OPM 32% 100% evidence | 18.7/20 P/E 20.7× · PEG 0.68 100% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -30.9% · RS bench -18.6% · 1Y -33.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 19.8 + 18.7 + 0 = 55.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Pine Labs LtdPINELABS | 55.4/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 28.9/35 Revenue 19.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 6 pp 100% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 13% 100% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 180× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —4 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28.9 + 7.7 + 8.8 + 10 = 55.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8One 97 Communications LtdPAYTM | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.1/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 4.2 pp 100% evidence | 5.1/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 8% 100% evidence | 6.3/20 P/E 143× · PEG 2.42 65% evidence | 16.1/20 RS sector 12.8% · RS bench 47% · 1Y 44.1%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.1 + 5.1 + 6.3 + 16.1 = 53.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Info Edge (India) LtdNAUKRI | 50.7/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.7/35 Revenue 13.8% · PAT 37.1% · OPM change 6 pp 95% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 39% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 55× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.6/20 RS sector -8.1% · RS bench 7.2% · 1Y -7.1%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 9.8 + 9.6 + 9.6 = 50.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10TBO Tek Ltdthis pageTBOTEK | 45.9/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.0/35 Revenue 69% · PAT 14.2% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 4.3/20 P/E 67.8× · PEG 6.18 65% evidence | 10.5/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench 17.1% · 1Y 8.9%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 14.1 + 4.3 + 10.5 = 45.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Just Dial LtdJUSTDIAL | 33.9/100Adverse evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 6.6/35 Revenue 7.3% · PAT -16.6% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 10.5/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 27% 100% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 10.9× · PEG 1.83 65% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -20.6% · RS bench 3.5% · 1Y -18.9%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.6 + 10.5 + 11.1 + 5.7 = 33.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12One Mobikwik Systems LtdMOBIKWIK | 31.8/100Adverse evidence66% evidence | TURNING | 16.1/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT 92% · OPM change 18.1 pp 71% evidence | 2.2/25 ROCE -2.3% · OPM 2.9% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 562× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -13.8% · RS bench -2% · 1Y -28.6%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 2.2 + 8.5 + 5 = 31.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Urban Company LtdURBANCO | 28.8/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 7.3/35 Revenue 39.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -14.4 pp 100% evidence | 0.5/25 ROCE -7.8% · OPM -18% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench 23.9% · 1Y -9.7%5 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.3 + 0.5 + 10 + 11 = 28.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is TBO Tek Ltd's share price today?
TBO Tek Ltd trades at ₹1,680, +8.0% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹18,237 Cr. The stock sits at 95% of its 52-week range of ₹1,068–₹1,710, +14.8% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 7 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.
What were TBO Tek Ltd's latest quarterly results?
TBO Tek Ltd reported revenue of ₹926 Cr and net profit of ₹83.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 81.2% and profit rose 31.7% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹7.68. The operating margin was 15.0%, 1.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is TBO Tek Ltd's revenue?
TBO Tek Ltd reported revenue of ₹926 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +81.2% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹2,677 Cr (+54.1%). Over the last 8 years revenue compounded at 29.3% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is TBO Tek Ltd's profit?
TBO Tek Ltd earned ₹83.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +31.7% year on year — the 6th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹244 Cr. The operating margin ran 15.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is TBO Tek Ltd's market cap?
TBO Tek Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹18,237 Cr at a share price of ₹1,680. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is TBO Tek Ltd's P/E ratio?
TBO Tek Ltd trades at a P/E of 67.8×, at the 39th percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 72.9×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.
Does TBO Tek Ltd pay a dividend?
No — TBO Tek Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 9 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is TBO Tek Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, TBO Tek Ltd looks mid-range: its P/E of 67.8× sits at the 39th percentile of its 2-year range (long-run median 72.9×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is TBO Tek Ltd growing?
Yes — TBO Tek Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +81.2% year on year, profit +31.7%, and the margin +1.0 pp at 15.0%. The 8-year compound rates are 29.3% (revenue) and 27.0% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 11 September 2026.
How is TBO Tek Ltd performing?
TBO Tek Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 7 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 81.2% and profit rose 31.7% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 18 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.
What stage is TBO Tek Ltd in?
Consistent — revenue and profit growth have stayed positive through the window, with ROCE at 18.6% and holding. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +81.2% latest, profit growth +31.7% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 11 September 2026.
Is TBO Tek Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 7 of stage 2), trading +14.8% versus its 200-day average and at 95% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.
Is TBO Tek Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — TBO Tek Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 18 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 2.3 years the stock moved +15% against the NIFTY 500's +8% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.
Will TBO Tek Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for TBO Tek Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹1,680, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 7 weeks in. Its P/E of 67.8× sits at the 39th percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.
Who owns TBO Tek Ltd?
Promoters hold 44.4% of TBO Tek Ltd, foreign institutions 28.9%, domestic institutions 21.1% and the public 4.0% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions added 14.5 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.
Does TBO Tek Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — TBO Tek Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.49, and operating profit covers the interest bill 7×. FY26 borrowings were ₹756 Cr against equity of ₹1,551 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.
What is TBO Tek Ltd's capex?
TBO Tek Ltd spent ₹1,671 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹1,335 Cr, with ₹14.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is TBO Tek Ltd's cash flow?
TBO Tek Ltd consumed ₹21.0 Cr of operating cash in FY26 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: ₹−1,356 Cr). Operating cash was negative while the company reported a profit of ₹244 Cr. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is TBO Tek Ltd's profit real cash?
Mostly — over the last 3 fiscal years, 73% of TBO Tek Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−21.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹244 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into the working-capital cycle. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.
Where is TBO Tek Ltd in its business cycle?
TBO Tek Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 14.0%, against a 9-year band of −15.0%–19.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 15.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.
What growth does TBO Tek Ltd's price assume?
At its price on 25 August 2026, TBO Tek Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 32.6% a year. Profit itself has compounded 27.0% a year over the past 8 years. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 11 September 2026.
What could break the TBO Tek Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: Foreign institutions moved −13.9 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.
Is TBO Tek Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: TBO Tek Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!