Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd

MOBIKWIK
E-Commerce - Platform - Utility

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: Domestic institutions moved −5.3 points over 6 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.

The price is in a downtrend (79 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.

Price
₹205
−12.4% 1Y
P/E
1,072.0×
of its own 0-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
₹289 Cr
+7.8% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
₹4.4 Cr
Operating margin
3.5%
+24.6 pp YoY
ROCE
−2%
FY26
ROIC
77.7%
vs WACC 12.0% → +65.7 pp
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd trades at ₹205, in a downtrend and 79 weeks into that stage. That is −7.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 28% of a 52-week range of ₹169 to ₹298. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 4 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 79 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹205 it trades −7.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 28% of its 52-week range (₹169–₹298).

Jul 26: ₹205 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 2-year window.
−7.5% versus the 200-day line, week 79 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S4₹664₹532₹399₹266₹133₹205₹222Dec 24May 25Oct 25Mar 26Jul 26
S4₹664₹532₹399₹266₹133₹205₹222Dec 24Oct 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2024 Each cell is one week from 2024 to now (88 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Dec 24Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.6 years the stock moved −58% while the NIFTY 500 moved +5% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 4 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd trades at 1,072.0× P/E, against too little history to rank. Its long-run median P/E is 1,072.0×, measured across 0.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 1,072.0× is against too little history to rank, against a long-run median of 1,072.0× measured over 0.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 1,072.0× vs a 1,072.0× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 0.0-year window. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
against too little history to rank
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
1,141.1×₹0.61,068.6×₹0.5996.2×₹0.3923.8×₹0.2851.3×₹0.0×1,072.00×₹1Dec 24Dec 24Jan 25
1,141.1×₹0.61,068.6×₹0.5996.2×₹0.3923.8×₹0.2851.3×₹0.0×1,072.00×₹1Dec 24Dec 24Jan 25
P/E
1,072.0×
too little history to rank

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 7 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −4.4% in FY26 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
89%−298.8%64%−299.4%39%−300.0%14%−300.6%−11%−301.2%%%−4.4%−300%FY21FY23FY26
89%−298.8%64%−299.4%39%−300.0%14%−300.6%−11%−301.2%%%−4.4%−300%FY21FY23FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
RevenueProfitEPS
48%−158%30%−196%11%−234%−7.3%−272%−26%−311%%%7.8%−300%−300%Sep 23Dec 24Mar 26
48%−158%30%−196%11%−234%−7.3%−272%−26%−311%%%7.8%−300%−300%Sep 23Dec 24Mar 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
11%3.5%−4.0%−12%−19%%−2%FY23FY24FY26
11%3.5%−4.0%−12%−19%%−2%FY23FY24FY26
ROCE
Rising
latest −2.0% · span −17.0%–9.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−4.4%+27.6%+31.1%
Share price−12.4%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+7.8%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
31.1%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

31.5/100 — rank 12 of 13 in E-Commerce - Platform - Utility · 59% evidence confidence

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd scores 31.5 out of 100 against the 13 companies it is compared with in E-Commerce - Platform - Utility, ranking 12. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 15.6 + 2 + 10 + 3.9 = 31.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd reported ₹289 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +7.8% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 5 years it has compounded at 31.1% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,119 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,119 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,119 Cr (−4.4% on the year), capping 5 years at 31.1% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹289 Cr, +7.8% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue ₹1,119 Cr (−4.4% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 6-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
31.1% a year over 5 years
RevenueYoY growth
1.3k89%94864%63239%31614%0−11%₹ Cr%₹1,119−4.4%FY21FY23FY26
1.3k89%94864%63239%31614%0−11%₹ Cr%₹1,119−4.4%FY21FY23FY26
Mar 26: ₹289 Cr (+7.8% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
2nd straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
37048%27730%18511%92−7.3%0−26%₹ Cr%₹2897.8%Sep 23Dec 24Mar 26
37048%27730%18511%92−7.3%0−26%₹ Cr%₹2897.8%Sep 23Dec 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −3.2% growth against the decade's 31.1% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's operating margin is 3.5% in the Mar 26 quarter, +24.6 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −40.0% to 2.5%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 3.5%, +24.6 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −40.0%–2.5%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +24.6 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: −3.6% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 6-year window.
within a −40.0–2.5% band over 6 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
5.9%19%−6.4%11%−19%2.5%−31%−5.6%−43%−14%%%−3.6%5.4%FY21FY23FY26
5.9%19%−6.4%11%−19%2.5%−31%−5.6%−43%−14%%%−3.6%5.4%FY21FY23FY26
Mar 26: 3.5% operating margin (+24.6 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
5.6%28%−1.5%15%−8.7%1.6%−16%−12%−23%−25%%%3.5%24.6%Sep 23Dec 24Mar 26
5.6%28%−1.5%15%−8.7%1.6%−16%−12%−23%−25%%%3.5%24.6%Sep 23Dec 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd earned ₹4.4 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹62.0 Cr. That is 1.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹56.0 Cr. 7 of the last 11 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was ₹4.4 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−62.0 Cr (null).

FY26 profit ₹−62.0 Cr (null YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 6-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
25−970.2%−16−970.8%−57−971.4%−98−972.0%−139−972.6%₹ Cr%₹−62−971.4%FY21FY23FY26
25−970.2%−16−970.8%−57−971.4%−98−972.0%−139−972.6%₹ Cr%₹−62−971.4%FY21FY23FY26
Mar 26: ₹4.4 Cr (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
10−90%−8−374%−25−659%−43−943%−61−1,227%₹ Cr%₹4−1,149%Sep 23Dec 24Mar 26
10−90%−8−374%−25−659%−43−943%−61−1,227%₹ Cr%₹4−1,149%Sep 23Dec 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY26 that was ₹−78.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−62.0 Cr of profit. After ₹12.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−90.0 Cr was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

FY26: operating cash of ₹−78.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−62.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−90.0 Cr after ₹12.0 Cr of capital spending.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹−78.0 Cr vs profit ₹−62.0 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 6-year window, annual resolution.
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
56−48−152−256−360₹ Cr₹−78₹−62₹−90FY21FY23FY26
56−48−152−256−360₹ Cr₹−78₹−62₹−90FY21FY23FY26
FY26: CFO = −157% of profit Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
121%46%−29%−103%−178%%−157%FY21FY23FY26
121%46%−29%−103%−178%%−157%FY21FY23FY26

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 24 days in FY26, down from 48 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹39.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,119 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹3.1 Cr, so roughly ₹74.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 24 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 24 days, tighter than FY21's 48.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,119 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹3.1 Cr — so the 24-day loop keeps roughly ₹74.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 24-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 6-year window.
−24 days vs FY21
Cash cycleDebtor days
5444342414days24d24dFY21FY22FY23FY24FY26
5444342414days24d24dFY21FY23FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹39.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹31.0 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹12.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹0.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
steady investment
CapexWork-in-progress
24181260₹ Cr₹12₹0FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
24181260₹ Cr₹12₹0FY22FY24FY26

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd earns a ROCE of −2% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −57% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +65.7 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is −5.5% net margin on 0.79× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is −2%, recovered from a FY22 trough of −57% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −5.5% net margin × 0.79× asset turns × 2.61× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −11.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 77.7% − 12.0% = a +65.7 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.

FY26: ROCE −2% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY22's −57%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
136%76%15%−45%−105%%−2%77.7%FY22FY24FY26
136%76%15%−45%−105%%−2%77.7%FY22FY24FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE 16.7% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
560%308%56%−196%−447%%16.7%490.3%Q1 FY24Q2 FY25Q4 FY26
560%308%56%−196%−447%%16.7%490.3%Q1 FY24Q2 FY25Q4 FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd carries total debt of ₹276 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹539 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.51. On the annual view that ratio went from −3.05 in FY21 to 0.51 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹276 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹539 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.51. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from −3.05 (FY21) to 0.51 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY26: debt ₹276 Cr at 0.51× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
3151.7×2370.4×158−0.8×79−2.1×0−3.4×₹ Cr×₹2760.51×FY21FY24FY26
3151.7×2370.4×158−0.8×79−2.1×0−3.4×₹ Cr×₹2760.51×FY21FY24FY26
Mar 26: debt ₹276 Cr, debt-to-equity 0.51 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
3681.6×2761.3×1841.0×920.7×00.4×₹ Cr×₹2760.51×Mar 22Sep 24Mar 26
3681.6×2761.3×1841.0×920.7×00.4×₹ Cr×₹2760.51×Mar 22Sep 24Mar 26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Domestic institutions cut 5.3 points of One Mobikwik Systems Ltd over 6 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 3.5% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −0.3 points over the same window, to 4.5%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −5.3 points over 6 quarters to 3.5%; Foreign institutions: −0.3 points over 6 quarters to 4.5%; Promoters: −0.1 points over 6 quarters to 25.1%.

🚨 Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (−5.3 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters −0.1 pts from Mar 25 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 2 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
72%53%35%17%−1.1%%25.1%4.2%4.1%66.6%Mar 25Mar 26
72%53%35%17%−1.1%%25.1%4.2%4.1%66.6%Mar 25Mar 26
Domestic institutions cut 5.3 points over 6 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 7 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
72%54%35%17%−1.9%%25.1%4.5%3.5%66.9%Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
72%54%35%17%−1.9%%25.1%4.5%3.5%66.9%Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · E-Commerce - Platform - Utility
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Creative Newtech LtdCNL 70.0/100Favorable setup83% evidence BREAKING OUT 24.5/35 Revenue 52.3% · PAT 32.1% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence 13.2/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 4% 95% evidence 12.3/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 50% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 39.7% · RS bench 43.2% · 1Y 51.1%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.5 + 13.2 + 12.3 + 20 = 70 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2MPS LtdMPSLTD 63.5/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence TURNING 19.0/35 Revenue 10% · PAT 19% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence 22.0/25 ROCE 39.3% · OPM 34% 100% evidence 13.6/20 P/E 25.2× · PEG 0.43 100% evidence 8.9/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench 36.1% · 1Y 12.1%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 22 + 13.6 + 8.9 = 63.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Indiamart Intermesh LtdINDIAMART 63.2/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence ASLEEP 15.3/35 Revenue 12.7% · PAT -16.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 19.8/25 ROCE 28% · OPM 32% 100% evidence 18.2/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 0.68 100% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector 3.9% · RS bench -19.7% · 1Y -29.7%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.3 + 19.8 + 18.2 + 9.9 = 63.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
4Macfos Ltd543787 60.5/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence LEADER 19.1/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT 43.1% · OPM change 3.3 pp 83% evidence 18.9/25 ROCE 33.8% · OPM 13.6% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 44.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.8/20 RS sector 23.3% · RS bench 28.1% · 1Y 47.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.1 + 18.9 + 9.7 + 12.8 = 60.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5RNFI Services LtdRNFI 58.3/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence ASLEEP 21.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.4 pp 45% evidence 16.4/25 ROCE 27.3% · OPM 6.7% 95% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 24.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.6/20 RS sector 2.6% · RS bench -8% · 1Y 12.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 16.4 + 10.6 + 9.6 = 58.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6MSTC LtdMSTCLTD 56.7/100Mixed-positive evidence72% evidence TURNING 17.3/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT -46.4% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence 20.1/25 ROCE 30.3% · OPM 64% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 19.9× · PEG — 50% evidence 9.4/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench 22.1% · 1Y 23.3%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 20.1 + 9.9 + 9.4 = 56.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7Pine Labs LtdPINELABS 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence ASLEEP 28.2/35 Revenue 19.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 6 pp 100% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 13% 100% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 124× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 28.2 + 6.8 + 8.5 + 10 = 53.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8One 97 Communications LtdPAYTM 52.8/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence TURNING 25.2/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 4.2 pp 100% evidence 4.8/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 8% 100% evidence 8.3/20 P/E 106× · PEG 1.85 65% evidence 14.5/20 RS sector 12.8% · RS bench 10.7% · 1Y 25.8%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 25.2 + 4.8 + 8.3 + 14.5 = 52.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Info Edge (India) LtdNAUKRI 50.4/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence TURNING 22.4/35 Revenue 15.2% · PAT 34.7% · OPM change 7 pp 83% evidence 11.7/25 ROCE 5.4% · OPM 38% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 55.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.9/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench 1.7% · 1Y -14.6%4 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 22.4 + 11.7 + 9.4 + 6.9 = 50.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10TBO Tek LtdTBOTEK 45.0/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence TURNING 16.2/35 Revenue 69% · PAT 14.2% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 18% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 5.1/20 P/E 61.8× · PEG 6.18 65% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 11.7%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.2 + 13.6 + 5.1 + 10.1 = 45 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Just Dial LtdJUSTDIAL 39.5/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence TURNING 19.3/35 Revenue 23.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.6 pp 100% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 23.5% 100% evidence 5.0/20 P/E 43.7× · PEG 7.47 65% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -20.6% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y -15.8%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.3 + 9.1 + 5 + 6.1 = 39.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12One Mobikwik Systems Ltdthis pageMOBIKWIK 31.5/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence ASLEEP 15.6/35 Revenue -4.3% · PAT 48.9% · OPM change 24.6 pp 62% evidence 2.0/25 ROCE -2.2% · OPM 3.5% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -13.8% · RS bench -9.2% · 1Y -20%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.6 + 2 + 10 + 3.9 = 31.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Urban Company LtdURBANCO 27.5/100Adverse evidence60% evidence ASLEEP 7.2/35 Revenue 39.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -14.4 pp 100% evidence 0.3/25 ROCE -7.8% · OPM -18% 100% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —3 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 7.2 + 0.3 + 10 + 10 = 27.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's share price today?

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd trades at ₹205, −12.4% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹1,616 Cr. The stock sits at 28% of its 52-week range of ₹169–₹298, −7.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 79 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's latest quarterly results?

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd reported revenue of ₹289 Cr and net profit of ₹4.4 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹0.56. The operating margin was 3.5%, 24.6 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's revenue?

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd reported revenue of ₹289 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +7.8% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹1,119 Cr (−4.4%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 31.1% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's profit?

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd earned ₹4.4 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−62.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 3.5% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's market cap?

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹1,616 Cr at a share price of ₹205. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does One Mobikwik Systems Ltd pay a dividend?

No — One Mobikwik Systems Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 6 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.

How is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd performing?

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd is in a downtrend, 79 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 4 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 79 of stage 4), trading −7.5% versus its 200-day average and at 28% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd beating the market?

On recent form, yes — One Mobikwik Systems Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 4 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.6 years the stock moved −58% against the NIFTY 500's +5% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.

Will One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for One Mobikwik Systems Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹205, the price is in a downtrend 79 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns One Mobikwik Systems Ltd?

Promoters hold 25.1% of One Mobikwik Systems Ltd, foreign institutions 4.5%, domestic institutions 3.5% and the public 66.9% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions cut 5.3 points over 6 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does One Mobikwik Systems Ltd have too much debt?

It is moderate — One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.51, and operating profit covers the interest bill −2×. FY26 borrowings were ₹276 Cr against equity of ₹539 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.

What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's capex?

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd spent ₹39.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹12.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's cash flow?

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd generated ₹−78.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−90.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹12.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−62.0 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd in its business cycle?

One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's FY26 operating margin was −3.6%, against a 6-year band of −40.0%–2.5%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 3.5%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the One Mobikwik Systems Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: Domestic institutions moved −5.3 points over 6 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI