One Mobikwik Systems Ltd
MOBIKWIKOne Mobikwik Systems Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: Domestic institutions moved −5.3 points over 6 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.
The price is in a downtrend (79 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd trades at ₹205, in a downtrend and 79 weeks into that stage. That is −7.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 28% of a 52-week range of ₹169 to ₹298. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 4 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 79 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹205 it trades −7.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 28% of its 52-week range (₹169–₹298).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.6 years the stock moved −58% while the NIFTY 500 moved +5% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 4 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd trades at 1,072.0× P/E, against too little history to rank. Its long-run median P/E is 1,072.0×, measured across 0.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 1,072.0× is against too little history to rank, against a long-run median of 1,072.0× measured over 0.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 7 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −4.4% | +27.6% | +31.1% | — |
| Share price | −12.4% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
31.5/100 — rank 12 of 13 in E-Commerce - Platform - Utility · 59% evidence confidence
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd scores 31.5 out of 100 against the 13 companies it is compared with in E-Commerce - Platform - Utility, ranking 12. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 15.6 + 2 + 10 + 3.9 = 31.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd reported ₹289 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +7.8% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 5 years it has compounded at 31.1% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,119 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,119 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,119 Cr (−4.4% on the year), capping 5 years at 31.1% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹289 Cr, +7.8% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −3.2% growth against the decade's 31.1% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's operating margin is 3.5% in the Mar 26 quarter, +24.6 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −40.0% to 2.5%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 3.5%, +24.6 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −40.0%–2.5%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +24.6 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd earned ₹4.4 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹62.0 Cr. That is 1.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹56.0 Cr. 7 of the last 11 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was ₹4.4 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−62.0 Cr (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY26 that was ₹−78.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−62.0 Cr of profit. After ₹12.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−90.0 Cr was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.
FY26: operating cash of ₹−78.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−62.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−90.0 Cr after ₹12.0 Cr of capital spending.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 24 days in FY26, down from 48 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹39.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,119 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹3.1 Cr, so roughly ₹74.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 24 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 24 days, tighter than FY21's 48.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,119 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹3.1 Cr — so the 24-day loop keeps roughly ₹74.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹39.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹31.0 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd earns a ROCE of −2% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −57% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +65.7 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is −5.5% net margin on 0.79× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is −2%, recovered from a FY22 trough of −57% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −5.5% net margin × 0.79× asset turns × 2.61× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −11.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 77.7% − 12.0% = a +65.7 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd carries total debt of ₹276 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹539 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.51. On the annual view that ratio went from −3.05 in FY21 to 0.51 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹276 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹539 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.51. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from −3.05 (FY21) to 0.51 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions cut 5.3 points of One Mobikwik Systems Ltd over 6 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 3.5% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −0.3 points over the same window, to 4.5%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −5.3 points over 6 quarters to 3.5%; Foreign institutions: −0.3 points over 6 quarters to 4.5%; Promoters: −0.1 points over 6 quarters to 25.1%.
🚨 Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (−5.3 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Creative Newtech LtdCNL | 70.0/100Favorable setup83% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.5/35 Revenue 52.3% · PAT 32.1% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 4% 95% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 39.7% · RS bench 43.2% · 1Y 51.1%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.5 + 13.2 + 12.3 + 20 = 70 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2MPS LtdMPSLTD | 63.5/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | TURNING | 19.0/35 Revenue 10% · PAT 19% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence | 22.0/25 ROCE 39.3% · OPM 34% 100% evidence | 13.6/20 P/E 25.2× · PEG 0.43 100% evidence | 8.9/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench 36.1% · 1Y 12.1%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 22 + 13.6 + 8.9 = 63.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Indiamart Intermesh LtdINDIAMART | 63.2/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.3/35 Revenue 12.7% · PAT -16.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 19.8/25 ROCE 28% · OPM 32% 100% evidence | 18.2/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 0.68 100% evidence | 9.9/20 RS sector 3.9% · RS bench -19.7% · 1Y -29.7%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.3 + 19.8 + 18.2 + 9.9 = 63.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 4Macfos Ltd543787 | 60.5/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | LEADER | 19.1/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT 43.1% · OPM change 3.3 pp 83% evidence | 18.9/25 ROCE 33.8% · OPM 13.6% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 44.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.8/20 RS sector 23.3% · RS bench 28.1% · 1Y 47.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 18.9 + 9.7 + 12.8 = 60.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5RNFI Services LtdRNFI | 58.3/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.4 pp 45% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 27.3% · OPM 6.7% 95% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 24.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.6/20 RS sector 2.6% · RS bench -8% · 1Y 12.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 16.4 + 10.6 + 9.6 = 58.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6MSTC LtdMSTCLTD | 56.7/100Mixed-positive evidence72% evidence | TURNING | 17.3/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT -46.4% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 30.3% · OPM 64% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 19.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench 22.1% · 1Y 23.3%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 20.1 + 9.9 + 9.4 = 56.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Pine Labs LtdPINELABS | 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | ASLEEP | 28.2/35 Revenue 19.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 6 pp 100% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 13% 100% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 124× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28.2 + 6.8 + 8.5 + 10 = 53.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8One 97 Communications LtdPAYTM | 52.8/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 25.2/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 4.2 pp 100% evidence | 4.8/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 8% 100% evidence | 8.3/20 P/E 106× · PEG 1.85 65% evidence | 14.5/20 RS sector 12.8% · RS bench 10.7% · 1Y 25.8%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.2 + 4.8 + 8.3 + 14.5 = 52.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Info Edge (India) LtdNAUKRI | 50.4/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence | TURNING | 22.4/35 Revenue 15.2% · PAT 34.7% · OPM change 7 pp 83% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 5.4% · OPM 38% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 55.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench 1.7% · 1Y -14.6%4 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 11.7 + 9.4 + 6.9 = 50.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10TBO Tek LtdTBOTEK | 45.0/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 16.2/35 Revenue 69% · PAT 14.2% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 18% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 5.1/20 P/E 61.8× · PEG 6.18 65% evidence | 10.1/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 11.7%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 13.6 + 5.1 + 10.1 = 45 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Just Dial LtdJUSTDIAL | 39.5/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 19.3/35 Revenue 23.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.6 pp 100% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 23.5% 100% evidence | 5.0/20 P/E 43.7× · PEG 7.47 65% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -20.6% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y -15.8%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 9.1 + 5 + 6.1 = 39.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12One Mobikwik Systems Ltdthis pageMOBIKWIK | 31.5/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.6/35 Revenue -4.3% · PAT 48.9% · OPM change 24.6 pp 62% evidence | 2.0/25 ROCE -2.2% · OPM 3.5% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -13.8% · RS bench -9.2% · 1Y -20%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 2 + 10 + 3.9 = 31.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Urban Company LtdURBANCO | 27.5/100Adverse evidence60% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.2/35 Revenue 39.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -14.4 pp 100% evidence | 0.3/25 ROCE -7.8% · OPM -18% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —3 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.2 + 0.3 + 10 + 10 = 27.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's share price today?
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd trades at ₹205, −12.4% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹1,616 Cr. The stock sits at 28% of its 52-week range of ₹169–₹298, −7.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 79 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's latest quarterly results?
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd reported revenue of ₹289 Cr and net profit of ₹4.4 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹0.56. The operating margin was 3.5%, 24.6 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's revenue?
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd reported revenue of ₹289 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +7.8% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹1,119 Cr (−4.4%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 31.1% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's profit?
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd earned ₹4.4 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−62.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 3.5% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's market cap?
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹1,616 Cr at a share price of ₹205. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does One Mobikwik Systems Ltd pay a dividend?
No — One Mobikwik Systems Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 6 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.
How is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd performing?
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd is in a downtrend, 79 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 4 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 79 of stage 4), trading −7.5% versus its 200-day average and at 28% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — One Mobikwik Systems Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 4 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.6 years the stock moved −58% against the NIFTY 500's +5% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for One Mobikwik Systems Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹205, the price is in a downtrend 79 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns One Mobikwik Systems Ltd?
Promoters hold 25.1% of One Mobikwik Systems Ltd, foreign institutions 4.5%, domestic institutions 3.5% and the public 66.9% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions cut 5.3 points over 6 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does One Mobikwik Systems Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.51, and operating profit covers the interest bill −2×. FY26 borrowings were ₹276 Cr against equity of ₹539 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.
What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's capex?
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd spent ₹39.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹12.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's cash flow?
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd generated ₹−78.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−90.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹12.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−62.0 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd in its business cycle?
One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's FY26 operating margin was −3.6%, against a 6-year band of −40.0%–2.5%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 3.5%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the One Mobikwik Systems Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: Domestic institutions moved −5.3 points over 6 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is One Mobikwik Systems Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: One Mobikwik Systems Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.