Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-11
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11

Scoda Tubes Ltd

SCODATUBES
Steel - Tubes/Pipes

Scoda Tubes Ltd is cheap for a reason. The P/E sits at the 35th percentile of its own range, and the quarters are still getting worse.

The sharpest disagreement: the P/E sits at the 35th percentile of its own range, but the engine is deteriorating — cheap for a reason until the quarters turn.

The price is in a downtrend (40 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 35th percentile of its own 1-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −25.8% year on year, and 7% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the quarters turn before the discount closes.

Price
₹130
−26.4% 1Y
P/E
21.0×
35th pctile
of its own 1-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹124 Cr
+27.6% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹5.3 Cr
−25.8% YoY
Operating margin
12.8%
−1.7 pp YoY
ROCE
17%
FY26
ROIC
10.4%
vs WACC 12.0% → −1.6 pp
Cash conversion
7%
of profit, last 3 FY
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified. PEG is the exception: the quarterly curve is not drawn at all. PEG asks what is being paid for growth — both sides of that division come from the source that could not be checked, so it is withheld instead of marked.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Scoda Tubes Ltd trades at ₹130, in a downtrend and 40 weeks into that stage. That is −9.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 21% of a 52-week range of ₹119 to ₹171. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (3 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 40 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹130 it trades −9.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 21% of its 52-week range (₹119–₹171).

Sep 26: ₹130 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
−9.3% versus the 200-day line, week 40 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4₹220₹193₹166₹139₹112₹130₹143Jun 25Oct 25Feb 26Jun 26Sep 26
S2S4₹220₹193₹166₹139₹112₹130₹143Jun 25Feb 26Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2025 Each cell is one week from 2025 to now (70 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Jun 25Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.3 years the stock moved −15% while the NIFTY 500 moved −2% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-21) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Scoda Tubes Ltd trades at 21.0× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 35% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 21.7×, measured across 1.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 21.0× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 35% of the time, against a long-run median of 21.7× measured over 1.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 21.0× vs a 21.7× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 1.0-year window; loss-period spikes above 24× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 35% of the time
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
24.7×₹7.822.5×₹5.820.4×₹3.918.3×₹1.916.1×₹0.0×21.00×₹6Sep 25Dec 25Mar 26Jun 26Sep 26
24.7×₹7.822.5×₹5.820.4×₹3.918.3×₹1.916.1×₹0.0×21.00×₹6Sep 25Mar 26Sep 26
P/E
21.0×
35th percentile of 1y

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −9.7% against a −26.4% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

03 · What the price assumes

What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.

Solved at its 13 June 2026 price, Scoda Tubes Ltd was paying for profit growth of about 10.5% a year. Profit itself has compounded 110.1% a year over the past 4 years. Today the market pays 21.0× P/E, the 35th percentile of its own 1-year range.

What the two numbers say together. The multiple is low against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is below what this company has actually delivered.

How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 13 June 2026, not a running figure — every other number on this page, the multiple included, is read off the live quote as of 11 September 2026. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements.

04 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Scoda Tubes Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 6 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +7.0% in FY26, profit +21.9% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
61%325%47%235%32%145%18%55%3.0%−34%%%7%21.9%FY22FY24FY26
61%325%47%235%32%145%18%55%3.0%−34%%%7%21.9%FY22FY24FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
RevenueProfit
30%144%22%98%13%53%4.9%7.2%−3.4%−38%%%27.6%−25.8%Mar 24Mar 25Jun 26
30%144%22%98%13%53%4.9%7.2%−3.4%−38%%%27.6%−25.8%Mar 24Mar 25Jun 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
20%19%18%17%16%%17%FY23FY24FY26
20%19%18%17%16%%17%FY23FY24FY26
ROCE
Steady high
latest 17.0% · span 16.0%–20.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+7.0%+19.4%
Profit+21.9%+57.4%
EPS−9.7%
Share price−26.4%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+27.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
−25.8%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
27.9%
long-run compound pace
05 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

45.0/100 — rank 10 of 15 in Steel - Tubes/Pipes · 65% evidence confidence

Scoda Tubes Ltd scores 45.0 out of 100 against the 15 companies it is compared with in Steel - Tubes/Pipes, ranking 10. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 9.6 + 16.8 + 10.4 + 8.2 = 45. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

06 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Scoda Tubes Ltd reported ₹124 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +27.6% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 27.9% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹519 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹546 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹519 Cr (+7.0% on the year), capping 4 years at 27.9% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹124 Cr, +27.6% year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹519 Cr (+7.0% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
27.9% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
56161%42047%28032%14018%03.0%₹ Cr%₹5197%FY22FY24FY26
56161%42047%28032%14018%03.0%₹ Cr%₹5197%FY22FY24FY26
Jun 26: ₹124 Cr (+27.6% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
16530%12322%8213%414.9%0−3.4%₹ Cr%₹12427.6%Mar 24Mar 25Jun 26
16530%12322%8213%414.9%0−3.4%₹ Cr%₹12427.6%Mar 24Mar 25Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +12.3% growth against the decade's 27.9% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

07 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Scoda Tubes Ltd's operating margin is 12.8% in the Jun 26 quarter, −1.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 5.0% to 16.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 12.8%, −1.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 5.0%–16.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −1.7 pp year on year while gross margin went +2.8 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY26: 15.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a 5.0–16.0% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
17%6.6%14%4.5%11%2.5%7.3%0.5%4.1%−1.6%%%15%−1%FY22FY24FY26
17%6.6%14%4.5%11%2.5%7.3%0.5%4.1%−1.6%%%15%−1%FY22FY24FY26
Jun 26: 12.8% operating margin (−1.7 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
18%1.3%17%0.2%15%−0.9%14%−1.9%12%−3.0%%%12.8%−1.7%Mar 24Mar 25Jun 26
18%1.3%17%0.2%15%−0.9%14%−1.9%12%−3.0%%%12.8%−1.7%Mar 24Mar 25Jun 26
08 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Scoda Tubes Ltd earned ₹5.3 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −25.8% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹39.0 Cr. The 4-year compound rate is 110.1%. That is 4.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹7.1 Cr.

Jun 26 profit was ₹5.3 Cr, −25.8% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹39.0 Cr (+21.9%), and the 4-year compound rate is 110.1%.

FY26 profit ₹39.0 Cr (+21.9% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
110.1% a year over 4 years
Net profitYoY growth
42430%32321%21211%11101%0−8.3%₹ Cr%₹3921.9%FY22FY24FY26
42430%32321%21211%11101%0−8.3%₹ Cr%₹3921.9%FY22FY24FY26
Jun 26: ₹5.3 Cr (−25.8% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
15144%1198%853%47.2%0−38%₹ Cr%₹5−25.8%Mar 24Mar 25Jun 26
15144%1198%853%47.2%0−38%₹ Cr%₹5−25.8%Mar 24Mar 25Jun 26

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +27.6% and the margin −1.7 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +4.7% vs revenue +12.3%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

09 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 7% of Scoda Tubes Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹−14.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹39.0 Cr of profit. After ₹99.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−113 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹−14.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹39.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−113 Cr after ₹99.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 7% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹−14.0 Cr vs profit ₹39.0 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
7% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
517−37−81−125₹ Cr₹−14₹39₹−113FY22FY24FY26
517−37−81−125₹ Cr₹−14₹39₹−113FY22FY24FY26
FY26: CFO = −36% of profit (three-year rate 7%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
404%−336%−1,075%−1,815%−2,554%%−36%FY22FY24FY26
404%−336%−1,075%−1,815%−2,554%%−36%FY22FY24FY26

🚨 Why conversion sits at 7%: the cash cycle stretched 22 days between FY22 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 22 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.

10 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Scoda Tubes Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 211 days in FY26, up from 189 days in FY22. Capital spending ran ₹175 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹519 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.4 Cr, so roughly ₹300 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 97 days, inventory at 217 days — roughly 7.1 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 211 days, looser than FY22's 189.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 217 days to sell; customers pay about 97 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 103 days — netting out to the 211-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹519 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.4 Cr — so the 211-day loop keeps roughly ₹300 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 211-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 5-year window.
+22 days vs FY22
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
233176119614days211d217d97d103dFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
233176119614days211d217d97d103dFY22FY24FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹175 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹43.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹9.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹99.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹9.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
1078053270₹ Cr₹99₹9FY23FY24FY26
1078053270₹ Cr₹99₹9FY23FY24FY26

The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.

11 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

Scoda Tubes Ltd earns a ROCE of 17% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 16% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −1.6 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 7.5% net margin on 0.75× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 17%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 16% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 7.5% net margin × 0.75× asset turns × 1.76× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 9.9% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 10.4% − 12.0% = a −1.6 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE 17% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 4-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY23's 16%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
21%18%15%12%9.4%%17%11.6%FY23FY24FY26
21%18%15%12%9.4%%17%11.6%FY23FY24FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE 15.3% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 7 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
32%26%20%14%8.5%%15.3%13.3%Q4 FY24Q1 FY26Q4 FY26
32%26%20%14%8.5%%15.3%13.3%Q4 FY24Q1 FY26Q4 FY26
12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

Scoda Tubes Ltd carries total debt of ₹187 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹390 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.48. On the annual view that ratio went from 3.17 in FY24 to 0.48 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹187 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹390 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.48. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 3.17 (FY24) to 0.48 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY26: debt ₹187 Cr at 0.48× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 3-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
2283.4×1712.6×1141.8×571.0×00.3×₹ Cr×₹1870.48×FY24FY25FY26
2283.4×1712.6×1141.8×571.0×00.3×₹ Cr×₹1870.48×FY24FY25FY26
Mar 26: debt ₹187 Cr, debt-to-equity 0.48 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 7 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
2283.4×1712.6×1141.8×571.0×00.3×₹ Cr×₹1870.48×Mar 24Jun 25Mar 26
2283.4×1712.6×1141.8×571.0×00.3×₹ Cr×₹1870.48×Mar 24Jun 25Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Domestic institutions cut 4.3 points of Scoda Tubes Ltd over 4 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 3.6% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +0.3 points over the same window, to 8.4%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −4.3 points over 4 quarters to 3.6%; Foreign institutions: +0.3 points over 4 quarters to 8.4%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 4 quarters to 66.4%.

🚨 Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (−4.3 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Domestic institutions cut 4.3 points over 4 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 5 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
71%53%35%17%−1.4%%66.4%8.4%3.6%21.6%Jun 25Sep 25Dec 25Mar 26Jun 26
71%53%35%17%−1.4%%66.4%8.4%3.6%21.6%Jun 25Dec 25Jun 26
14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Scoda Tubes Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

15 · Related companies · Steel - Tubes/Pipes
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Man Industries (India) LtdMANINDS 68.9/100Favorable setup100% evidence BREAKING OUT 23.0/35 Revenue 10.8% · PAT 25.9% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence 14.5/25 ROCE 16.2% · OPM 14% 100% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 31.8× · PEG 0.2 100% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 58.9% · RS bench 82.2% · 1Y 104.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23 + 14.5 + 11.4 + 20 = 68.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Sambhv Steel Tubes LtdSAMBHV 67.3/100Favorable setup77% evidence BREAKING OUT 28.2/35 Revenue 48.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 16.2/25 ROCE 19.4% · OPM 13% 100% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 23.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.7/20 RS sector 5.4% · RS bench 22.1% · 1Y 7.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 28.2 + 16.2 + 10.2 + 12.7 = 67.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3APL Apollo Tubes LtdAPLAPOLLO 67.2/100Favorable setup100% evidence BREAKING OUT 24.1/35 Revenue 10.4% · PAT 53.4% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 18.6/25 ROCE 31.8% · OPM 7% 100% evidence 13.4/20 P/E 48.6× · PEG 0.7 100% evidence 11.1/20 RS sector -2.9% · RS bench 13.4% · 1Y 29.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.1 + 18.6 + 13.4 + 11.1 = 67.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
4DEE Development Engineers LtdDEEDEV 62.5/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence FADING 27.8/35 Revenue 40.1% · PAT 50% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 8.0/25 ROCE 10.7% · OPM 17% 100% evidence 13.0/20 P/E 58.7× · PEG 0.62 65% evidence 13.7/20 RS sector 44.8% · RS bench 62.8% · 1Y 133.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27.8 + 8 + 13 + 13.7 = 62.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Gandhi Special Tubes LtdGANDHITUBE 61.0/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence TURNING 22.0/35 Revenue 11.1% · PAT 13.6% · OPM change 4 pp 95% evidence 19.3/25 ROCE 28.4% · OPM 47% 95% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 14.3× · PEG — 50% evidence 8.4/20 RS sector -7.8% · RS bench 7% · 1Y -11.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22 + 19.3 + 11.3 + 8.4 = 61 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Venus Pipes & Tubes LtdVENUSPIPES 60.9/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence LEADER 16.1/35 Revenue 21.9% · PAT 14.3% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 19.6/25 ROCE 21.3% · OPM 16% 100% evidence 6.9/20 P/E 40.3× · PEG 3.93 100% evidence 18.3/20 RS sector 32.6% · RS bench 52.7% · 1Y 53.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.1 + 19.6 + 6.9 + 18.3 = 60.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 52.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
7JTL Industries LtdJTLIND 60.6/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence BREAKING OUT 25.3/35 Revenue 19% · PAT 42.4% · OPM change 3.7 pp 100% evidence 5.5/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM 8% 100% evidence 13.6/20 P/E 29.5× · PEG 1.27 100% evidence 16.2/20 RS sector 12.2% · RS bench 29.7% · 1Y 11.2%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.3 + 5.5 + 13.6 + 16.2 = 60.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Maharashtra Seamless LtdMAHSEAMLES 51.3/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence TURNING 9.7/35 Revenue -12.2% · PAT -16.1% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 14.3% · OPM 16% 76% evidence 12.7/20 P/E 13.2× · PEG — 50% evidence 15.6/20 RS sector 7.6% · RS bench 24.9% · 1Y 15%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.7 + 13.3 + 12.7 + 15.6 = 51.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 24.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
9Welspun Specialty Solutions LtdWELSPLSOL 47.7/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence LEADER 20.0/35 Revenue 15.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.3 pp 74% evidence 5.8/25 ROCE 9.9% · OPM 5.4% 100% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 129× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 14.9% · RS bench 32.5% · 1Y 78.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 5.8 + 8.5 + 13.4 = 47.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Scoda Tubes Ltdthis pageSCODATUBES 45.0/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence TURNING 9.6/35 Revenue 11.2% · PAT 8.7% · OPM change -1.7 pp 95% evidence 16.8/25 ROCE 16.5% · OPM 12.8% 95% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 21× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench -10.1% · 1Y -27.7%3 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 9.6 + 16.8 + 10.4 + 8.2 = 45 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Hariom Pipe Industries LtdHARIOMPIPE 44.5/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 12.0/35 Revenue 10.8% · PAT 1.5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence 15.8/25 ROCE 15.7% · OPM 12% 95% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 16.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.8/20 RS sector -14.3% · RS bench -4.7% · 1Y -26%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12 + 15.8 + 10.9 + 5.8 = 44.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Goodluck India LtdGOODLUCK 41.5/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence BASING 20.4/35 Revenue 9.9% · PAT 23.5% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 11.1/25 ROCE 14.4% · OPM 10% 100% evidence 6.2/20 P/E 25.2× · PEG 1.68 100% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -57% · RS bench 26.1% · 1Y -58%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.4 + 11.1 + 6.2 + 3.8 = 41.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Hi-Tech Pipes LtdHITECH 32.6/100Adverse evidence87% evidence ASLEEP 14.8/35 Revenue 61.2% · PAT -1.3% · OPM change -1.5 pp 95% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE 9.8% · OPM 3.5% 95% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 20.6× · PEG — 50% evidence 2.2/20 RS sector -26.9% · RS bench -14.8% · 1Y -15.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.8 + 5.4 + 10.2 + 2.2 = 32.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Surya Roshni LtdSURYAROSNI 31.6/100Adverse evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 13.3/35 Revenue 11.7% · PAT 8.3% · OPM change 0.7 pp 100% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 15.6% · OPM 5% 100% evidence 5.0/20 P/E 15× · PEG 4.08 100% evidence 2.5/20 RS sector -25.5% · RS bench -13.1% · 1Y -27.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.3 + 10.8 + 5 + 2.5 = 31.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Rama Steel Tubes LtdRAMASTEEL 23.0/100Adverse evidence87% evidence ASLEEP 8.7/35 Revenue -1.8% · PAT -44.1% · OPM change 2.1 pp 95% evidence 4.7/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 2.7% 95% evidence 7.4/20 P/E 49.6× · PEG — 50% evidence 2.2/20 RS sector -51.6% · RS bench -42.6% · 1Y -62%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 8.7 + 4.7 + 7.4 + 2.2 = 23 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Scoda Tubes Ltd's share price today?

Scoda Tubes Ltd trades at ₹130, −26.4% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹778 Cr. The stock sits at 21% of its 52-week range of ₹119–₹171, −9.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 40 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.

What were Scoda Tubes Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Scoda Tubes Ltd reported revenue of ₹124 Cr and net profit of ₹5.3 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 27.6% and profit fell 25.8% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹0.88. The operating margin was 12.8%, 1.7 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Scoda Tubes Ltd's revenue?

Scoda Tubes Ltd reported revenue of ₹124 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +27.6% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹519 Cr (+7.0%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 27.9% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Scoda Tubes Ltd's profit?

Scoda Tubes Ltd earned ₹5.3 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −25.8% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹39.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 12.8% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Scoda Tubes Ltd's market cap?

Scoda Tubes Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹778 Cr at a share price of ₹130. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Scoda Tubes Ltd's P/E ratio?

Scoda Tubes Ltd trades at a P/E of 21.0×, at the 35th percentile of its own 1-year range, against a long-run median of 21.7×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Scoda Tubes Ltd pay a dividend?

No — Scoda Tubes Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 5 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Scoda Tubes Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Scoda Tubes Ltd looks cheap: its P/E of 21.0× has been cheaper only 35% of the time in 1 years (long-run median 21.7×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Scoda Tubes Ltd growing?

Not right now — Scoda Tubes Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue +27.6% year on year, profit −25.8%, and the margin −1.7 pp at 12.8%. The 4-year compound rates are 27.9% (revenue) and 110.1% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 11 September 2026.

How is Scoda Tubes Ltd performing?

Scoda Tubes Ltd is in a downtrend, 40 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 27.6% and profit fell 25.8% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 3 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Scoda Tubes Ltd in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 40 of stage 4), trading −9.3% versus its 200-day average and at 21% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Scoda Tubes Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Scoda Tubes Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-21), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.3 years the stock moved −15% against the NIFTY 500's −2% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.

Will Scoda Tubes Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Scoda Tubes Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹130, the price is in a downtrend 40 weeks in. Its P/E of 21.0× sits at the 35th percentile of its own 1-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.

Who owns Scoda Tubes Ltd?

Promoters hold 66.4% of Scoda Tubes Ltd, foreign institutions 8.4%, domestic institutions 3.6% and the public 21.6% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions cut 4.3 points over 4 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Scoda Tubes Ltd have too much debt?

It is moderate — Scoda Tubes Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.48, and operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. FY26 borrowings were ₹187 Cr against equity of ₹390 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Scoda Tubes Ltd's capex?

Scoda Tubes Ltd spent ₹175 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹99.0 Cr, with ₹9.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Scoda Tubes Ltd's cash flow?

Scoda Tubes Ltd consumed ₹14.0 Cr of operating cash in FY26 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: ₹−113 Cr). Operating cash was negative while the company reported a profit of ₹39.0 Cr. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Scoda Tubes Ltd's profit real cash?

Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, 7% of Scoda Tubes Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−14.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹39.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into the working-capital cycle. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.

Where is Scoda Tubes Ltd in its business cycle?

Scoda Tubes Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 15.0%, against a 5-year band of 5.0%–16.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 12.8%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.

What growth does Scoda Tubes Ltd's price assume?

At its price on 13 June 2026, Scoda Tubes Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 10.5% a year. Profit itself has compounded 110.1% a year over the past 4 years. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 11 September 2026.

What could break the Scoda Tubes Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: the P/E sits at the 35th percentile of its own range, but the engine is deteriorating — cheap for a reason until the quarters turn. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Scoda Tubes Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Scoda Tubes Ltd is cheap for a reason. The P/E sits at the 35th percentile of its own range, and the quarters are still getting worse. The sharpest open question: whether the quarters turn before the discount closes. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI