RattanIndia Power Ltd
RTNPOWERRattanIndia Power Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −32.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −75.6% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a downtrend (44 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 43rd percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed, and 23% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
RattanIndia Power Ltd trades at ₹8.7, in a downtrend and 44 weeks into that stage. That is −9.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 17% of a 52-week range of ₹8 to ₹12. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (8 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 44 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹8.7 it trades −9.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 17% of its 52-week range (₹8–₹12).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved −14% while the NIFTY 500 moved +268% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (8 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-19) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
RattanIndia Power Ltd trades at 42.0× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (43rd percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 50.2×, measured across 1.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 42.0× is mid-range by its own standards (43rd percentile), against a long-run median of 50.2× measured over 1.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −75.6% against a −32.1% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
RattanIndia Power Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −8.9% | −2.5% | +13.9% | +1.4% |
| Profit | −76.6% | — | — | — |
| EPS | −75.6% | — | — | — |
| Share price | −32.1% | +21.6% | +6.0% | −2.7% |
4-Factor Sector Score
31.0/100 — rank 20 of 20 in Power - Generation/Distribution · 75% evidence confidence
RattanIndia Power Ltd scores 31.0 out of 100 against the 20 companies it is compared with in Power - Generation/Distribution, ranking 20. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 12 + 5.5 + 8.1 + 5.4 = 31. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
RattanIndia Power Ltd reported ₹799 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, −2.8% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 1.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,991 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,969 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,991 Cr (−8.9% on the year), capping 10 years at 1.4% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹799 Cr, −2.8% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −5.9% growth against the decade's 1.4% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −6.4% over the last 4 quarters against −7.2%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −4.3% vs −89.2%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
RattanIndia Power Ltd's operating margin is 16.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +4.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 4.1% to 51.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 16.0%, +4.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 4.1%–51.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +3.9 pp year on year while gross margin went +3.0 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
RattanIndia Power Ltd earned ₹46.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹52.0 Cr. That is 5.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹13.0 Cr. 5 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 26 profit was ₹46.0 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹52.0 Cr (−76.6%).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 23% of RattanIndia Power Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹372 Cr of operating cash against ₹52.0 Cr of profit. After ₹52.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹320 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹372 Cr against reported profit of ₹52.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹320 Cr after ₹52.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 23% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why conversion sits at 23%: the cash cycle tightened 121 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
RattanIndia Power Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 336 days in FY26, down from 457 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹−7,168 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,991 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹8.2 Cr, so roughly ₹2,753 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 336 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 336 days, tighter than FY21's 457.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,991 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹8.2 Cr — so the 336-day loop keeps roughly ₹2,753 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹−7,168 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹869 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹21.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
RattanIndia Power Ltd earns a ROCE of 6% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −1% in FY15. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −10.6 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 1.7% net margin on 0.31× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 6%, recovered from a FY15 trough of −1% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 1.7% net margin × 0.31× asset turns × 2.07× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 1.1% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 1.4% − 12.0% = a −10.6 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
RattanIndia Power Ltd carries total debt of ₹3,711 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹4,638 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.80. On the annual view that ratio went from −4.34 in FY22 to 0.80 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹3,711 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹4,638 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.80. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from −4.34 (FY22) to 0.80 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Foreign institutions added 1.6 points of RattanIndia Power Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 5.3% of the company. Promoters moved +0.0 points over the same window, to 44.1%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +1.6 points over 8 quarters to 5.3%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 44.1%; Domestic institutions: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 6.6%.
Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (+1.6 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
RattanIndia Power Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1NLC India LtdNLCINDIA | 62.1/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence | FADING | 23.7/35 Revenue 14.5% · PAT 38.9% · OPM change 13 pp 83% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 10.4% · OPM 35% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 11.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.8/20 RS sector 12.4% · RS bench 6.5% · 1Y 24.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.7 + 13.1 + 10.5 + 14.8 = 62.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Mac Charles (India) Ltd507836 | 60.8/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | 25.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -8.4% · OPM change 547 pp 62% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 5.4% · OPM 76% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 17.7/20 RS sector 7.4% · RS bench 4.9% · 1Y 16.5%6 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-05 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 25.8 + 7.3 + 10 + 17.7 = 60.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3JSW Energy LtdJSWENERGY | 60.4/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | FADING | 21.9/35 Revenue 35.4% · PAT 7.7% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 8.2% · OPM 55% 76% evidence | 7.0/20 P/E 50.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.9/20 RS sector 11% · RS bench 5.1% · 1Y 7.1%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 13.6 + 7 + 17.9 = 60.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Adani Green Energy LtdADANIGREEN | 58.5/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 16.4/35 Revenue 11% · PAT -2.3% · OPM change 10 pp 95% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 7.4% · OPM 90% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 117× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.5/20 RS sector 29.8% · RS bench 22.8% · 1Y 41.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 13.9 + 8.7 + 19.5 = 58.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 22.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 5KPI Green Energy LtdKPIGREEN | 58.4/100Mixed-positive evidence72% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.5/35 Revenue 55.4% · PAT 56.6% · OPM change 9 pp 83% evidence | 17.0/25 ROCE 13.8% · OPM 37% 76% evidence | 13.2/20 P/E 15.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -5% · RS bench -15.3% · 1Y -28%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 17 + 13.2 + 5.7 = 58.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Adani Power LtdADANIPOWER | 57.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | FADING | 15.7/35 Revenue 6.6% · PAT 19.7% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 16.7/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 42% 100% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 28.6× · PEG 0.65 100% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 30.9% · RS bench 24% · 1Y 85.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 16.7 + 11.3 + 14 = 57.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 24%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7BF Utilities LtdBFUTILITIE | 56.5/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | TURNING | 18.9/35 Revenue -0.6% · PAT 16.8% · OPM change 3 pp 36% evidence | 18.9/25 ROCE 29.9% · OPM 76% 57% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 14.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -34% · RS bench -9.4% · 1Y -25.6%8 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 18.9 + 14.2 + 4.5 = 56.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Gujarat Industries Power Co LtdGIPCL | 55.0/100Mixed-positive evidence90% evidence | TURNING | 26.7/35 Revenue 18.7% · PAT 89.6% · OPM change 11 pp 88% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 46% 100% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 6.2× · PEG 2.48 100% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -15.4% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y -18.9%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.7 + 9.6 + 11.7 + 7 = 55 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9CESC LtdCESC | 52.7/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT 13.1% · OPM change -3 pp 83% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 10.6% · OPM 18% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 14.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector 3.5% · RS bench -1.9% · 1Y -4.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 14.3 + 10.6 + 11.3 = 52.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10NTPC LtdNTPC | 48.4/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.1/35 Revenue 2.4% · PAT 15.4% · OPM change 5 pp 95% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 8.3% · OPM 32% 76% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 12.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.4/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench -3.4% · 1Y 4.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 13.2 + 11.7 + 8.4 = 48.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11SJVN LtdSJVN | 45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue 60.5% · PAT -7.3% · OPM change -16 pp 95% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 61% 95% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 42.2× · PEG 0.29 65% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -9.2% · RS bench -14.1% · 1Y -27.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 8.3 + 14.2 + 6.4 = 45.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12NHPC LtdNHPC | 42.7/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.1/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT 23.7% · OPM change -28 pp 88% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 23% 100% evidence | 4.9/20 P/E 21× · PEG 3.32 100% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 2.8% · RS bench -2.5% · 1Y -5.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 7.5 + 4.9 + 13.2 = 42.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -2.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 13Torrent Power LtdTORNTPOWER | 42.5/100Mixed-negative evidence78% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.5/35 Revenue -0.7% · PAT -19.2% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 13.7% · OPM 18% 76% evidence | 6.4/20 P/E 31.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.0/20 RS sector 5.7% · RS bench 0.4% · 1Y 6.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.5 + 15.6 + 6.4 + 11 = 42.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Jaiprakash Power Ventures LtdJPPOWER | 41.5/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.2/35 Revenue 8.8% · PAT -13.7% · OPM change 5 pp 100% evidence | 8.7/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 43% 100% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.0/20 RS sector -0.2% · RS bench 2.2% · 1Y -9.1%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.2 + 8.7 + 10.6 + 11 = 41.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Orient Green Power Company LtdGREENPOWER | 38.7/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.8/35 Revenue 0.7% · PAT 15.5% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 7.2% · OPM 68% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 21.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench -15.5% · 1Y -29%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 11.5 + 10.1 + 4.3 = 38.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Tata Power Company LtdTATAPOWER | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.0/35 Revenue -4.2% · PAT 8.4% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 5.2/20 P/E 31.1× · PEG 4.63 100% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector 1.3% · RS bench -4% · 1Y -3.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 13.1 + 5.2 + 8 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17India Power Corporation LtdDPSCLTD | 36.8/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.9/35 Revenue 10.1% · PAT 82.4% · OPM change 65.3 pp 62% evidence | 3.9/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM -1.8% 95% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 55.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -26.4% · RS bench -26% · 1Y -43.3%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 3.9 + 11.2 + 3.8 = 36.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18NTPC Green Energy LtdNTPCGREEN | 36.2/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.4/35 Revenue 42.1% · PAT 8.8% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 89% 100% evidence | 3.5/20 P/E 125× · PEG 4.9 65% evidence | 4.4/20 RS sector -4.3% · RS bench -9.4% · 1Y -14.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.4 + 8.9 + 3.5 + 4.4 = 36.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Reliance Power LtdRPOWER | 33.2/100Adverse evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.4/35 Revenue 0.5% · PAT -80% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence | 8.8/25 ROCE 6.1% · OPM 31% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -40.9% · RS bench -30.4% · 1Y -58.8%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.4 + 8.8 + 10 + 3 = 33.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20RattanIndia Power Ltdthis pageRTNPOWER | 31.0/100Adverse evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.0/35 Revenue -6.4% · PAT -4.3% · OPM change 4 pp 74% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE 6.2% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 42× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -13.9% · RS bench -12.6% · 1Y -34.7%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 5.5 + 8.1 + 5.4 = 31 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is RattanIndia Power Ltd's share price today?
RattanIndia Power Ltd trades at ₹8.7, −32.1% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹4,677 Cr. The stock sits at 17% of its 52-week range of ₹8–₹12, −9.1% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 44 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were RattanIndia Power Ltd's latest quarterly results?
RattanIndia Power Ltd reported revenue of ₹799 Cr and net profit of ₹46.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹0.09. The operating margin was 16.0%, 4.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is RattanIndia Power Ltd's revenue?
RattanIndia Power Ltd reported revenue of ₹799 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, −2.8% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹2,991 Cr (−8.9%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 1.4% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is RattanIndia Power Ltd's profit?
RattanIndia Power Ltd earned ₹46.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹52.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 16.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is RattanIndia Power Ltd's market cap?
RattanIndia Power Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹4,677 Cr at a share price of ₹8.7. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is RattanIndia Power Ltd's P/E ratio?
RattanIndia Power Ltd trades at a P/E of 42.0×, at the 43rd percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 50.2×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does RattanIndia Power Ltd pay a dividend?
No — RattanIndia Power Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is RattanIndia Power Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, RattanIndia Power Ltd looks mid-range against its own history: its P/E of 42.0× sits at the 43rd percentile of its 2-year range (long-run median 50.2×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
How is RattanIndia Power Ltd performing?
RattanIndia Power Ltd is in a downtrend, 44 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 8 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is RattanIndia Power Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 44 of stage 4), trading −9.1% versus its 200-day average and at 17% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is RattanIndia Power Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view RattanIndia Power Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (8 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-19), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved −14% against the NIFTY 500's +268% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will RattanIndia Power Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for RattanIndia Power Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹8.7, the price is in a downtrend 44 weeks in. Its P/E of 42.0× sits at the 43rd percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns RattanIndia Power Ltd?
Promoters hold 44.1% of RattanIndia Power Ltd, foreign institutions 5.3%, domestic institutions 6.6% and the public 44.1% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions added 1.6 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does RattanIndia Power Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — RattanIndia Power Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.80, and operating profit covers the interest bill 1×. FY26 borrowings were ₹3,711 Cr against equity of ₹4,638 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.
What is RattanIndia Power Ltd's capex?
RattanIndia Power Ltd spent ₹−7,168 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹52.0 Cr, with ₹21.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is RattanIndia Power Ltd's cash flow?
RattanIndia Power Ltd generated ₹372 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹320 Cr of free cash flow after ₹52.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹52.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is RattanIndia Power Ltd's profit real cash?
Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, 23% of RattanIndia Power Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹372 Cr against reported profit of ₹52.0 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is RattanIndia Power Ltd in its business cycle?
RattanIndia Power Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 14.0%, against a 13-year band of 4.1%–51.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 16.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the RattanIndia Power Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −32.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −75.6% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is RattanIndia Power Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: RattanIndia Power Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.