Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

Cyient Ltd

CYIENT
IT - ER&D

Cyient Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: Foreign institutions moved −13.9 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.

The price is in a downtrend (79 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 72nd percentile of its own 10-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit −30.6% year on year, and 127% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.

Stage
Deteriorating
partial read
Price
₹848
−28.3% 1Y
P/E
23.1×
72nd pctile
of its own 10-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹2,076 Cr
+21.3% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹109 Cr
−30.6% YoY
Operating margin
13.0%
flat YoY
ROCE
12%
FY26
Cash conversion
127%
of profit, last 3 FY
Withheld from this page: Part of this page is deliberately not drawn: its two data sources disagree by up to 16% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so nothing from the second source is placed here — the PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, the quarterly return curves, the annual return-on-invested-capital overlay, the total-debt and debt-to-equity series and the F-score and the return-on-invested-capital reading are absent for that reason. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data. The quarterly history also begins where the primary source begins: 6 earlier quarters the second source carries are not spliced in front of it. Extending a reported profit series is stricter than showing a ratio chart — it needs a source that has been checked.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Cyient Ltd trades at ₹848, in a downtrend and 79 weeks into that stage. That is −14.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 14% of a 52-week range of ₹785 to ₹1,242. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (6 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 79 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹848 it trades −14.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 14% of its 52-week range (₹785–₹1,242).

Jul 26: ₹848 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−14.5% versus the 200-day line, week 79 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S2S4₹2,516₹2,051₹1,586₹1,121₹656₹848₹991Jul 23May 24Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
S2S2S4₹2,516₹2,051₹1,586₹1,121₹656₹848₹991Jul 23Feb 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (546 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 16Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +110% while the NIFTY 500 moved +276% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-25) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Cyient Ltd trades at 23.1× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (72nd percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 18.9×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 23.1× is at the pricey end of its own range (72nd percentile), against a long-run median of 18.9× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 23.1× vs a 18.9× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 10.4-year window; loss-period spikes above 33× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
at the pricey end of its own range (72nd percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
34.9×₹70.926.9×₹53.118.9×₹35.410.9×₹17.72.9×₹0.0×23.10×₹37Mar 16Oct 18Jun 21Jan 24Jul 26
34.9×₹70.926.9×₹53.118.9×₹35.410.9×₹17.72.9×₹0.0×23.10×₹37Mar 16Jun 21Jul 26
P/E
23.1×
72nd percentile of 10y

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −30.6% against a −28.3% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the −3.0%/yr price move, ~+0.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−3.3 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +5.6%/yr price move, ~+2.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+3.3 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 16% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

03 · Stage: Deteriorating

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Cyient Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −36.9% latest against +1.9% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 12.0%. The read is built from 8 quarters across 4 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −1.2% in FY26, profit −28.5% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
36%49%24%28%13%6.4%1.6%−15%−9.9%−37%%%−1.2%−28.5%FY16FY21FY26
36%49%24%28%13%6.4%1.6%−15%−9.9%−37%%%−1.2%−28.5%FY16FY21FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising, profit rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
6.0%5.2%4.1%−6.8%2.1%−19%0.2%−31%−1.7%−43%%%3.2%−36.9%−39.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
6.0%5.2%4.1%−6.8%2.1%−19%0.2%−31%−1.7%−43%%%3.2%−36.9%−39.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
23%20%17%14%11%%12%FY23FY24FY26
23%20%17%14%11%%12%FY23FY24FY26
Revenue growth
Recovering
latest +3.2% · span −1.2% to +5.5%
Profit growth
Falling
latest −36.9% · span −36.9% to +1.9%
EPS growth
Falling
latest −39.6% · span −39.6% to −1.2%
ROCE
Falling
latest 12.0% · span 12.0%–22.0%

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−1.2%+6.5%+12.0%+8.9%
Profit−28.5%−3.4%+4.9%+3.8%
EPS−30.6%−6.1%+3.1%+2.9%
Share price−28.3%−16.6%−3.0%+5.6%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+21.3%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
−30.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
8.9%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

32.3/100 — rank 7 of 7 in IT - ER&D · 76% evidence confidence

Cyient Ltd scores 32.3 out of 100 against the 7 companies it is compared with in IT - ER&D, ranking 7. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 8.7 + 7.9 + 9.7 + 6 = 32.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Cyient Ltd reported ₹2,076 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +21.3% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 8.9% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹7,268 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹7,632 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹7,268 Cr (−1.2% on the year), capping 10 years at 8.9% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹2,076 Cr, +21.3% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue ₹7,268 Cr (−1.2% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
8.9% a year over 10 years
RevenueYoY growth
7.9k36%6.0k24%4.0k13%2.0k1.6%0−9.9%₹ Cr%₹7,268−1.2%FY16FY21FY26
7.9k36%6.0k24%4.0k13%2.0k1.6%0−9.9%₹ Cr%₹7,268−1.2%FY16FY21FY26
Jun 26: ₹2,076 Cr (+21.3% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
2nd straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
2.2k23%1.7k16%1.1k8.7%5611.3%0−6.0%₹ Cr%₹2,07621.3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
2.2k23%1.7k16%1.1k8.7%5611.3%0−6.0%₹ Cr%₹2,07621.3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +3.6% growth against the decade's 8.9% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +3.2% over the last 4 quarters against +3.4%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −36.9% vs −22.0%/yr — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Cyient Ltd's operating margin is 13.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +0.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 12.0% to 19.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 13.0%, +0.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 12.0%–19.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −0.7 pp year on year while gross margin went −4.6 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY26: 12.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 13-year window.
within a 12.0–19.0% band over 13 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
20%4.6%18%2.3%16%0.0%13%−2.3%11%−4.6%%%12%−3%FY14FY20FY26
20%4.6%18%2.3%16%0.0%13%−2.3%11%−4.6%%%12%−3%FY14FY20FY26
Jun 26: 13.0% operating margin (+0.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
18%0.3%17%−0.8%15%−2.0%13%−3.2%12%−4.3%%%13%0%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
18%0.3%17%−0.8%15%−2.0%13%−3.2%12%−4.3%%%13%0%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Cyient Ltd earned ₹109 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −30.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹463 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 3.8%. That is 5.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹157 Cr.

Jun 26 profit was ₹109 Cr, −30.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹463 Cr (−28.5%), and the 10-year compound rate is 3.8%.

FY26 profit ₹463 Cr (−28.5% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
3.8% a year over 10 years
Net profitYoY growth
75949%56928%3807.5%190−13%0−34%₹ Cr%₹463−28.5%FY16FY21FY26
75949%56928%3807.5%190−13%0−34%₹ Cr%₹463−28.5%FY16FY21FY26
Jun 26: ₹109 Cr (−30.6% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
21328%1603.0%106−22%53−47%0−71%₹ Cr%₹109−30.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
21328%1603.0%106−22%53−47%0−71%₹ Cr%₹109−30.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +21.3% and the margin +0.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −35.7% vs revenue +3.6%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 127% of Cyient Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹787 Cr of operating cash against ₹463 Cr of profit. After ₹359 Cr of capital spending, ₹428 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹787 Cr against reported profit of ₹463 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹428 Cr after ₹359 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 127% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹787 Cr vs profit ₹463 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution.
127% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
1.0k421−179−779−1.4k₹ Cr₹787₹463₹428FY16FY21FY26
1.0k421−179−779−1.4k₹ Cr₹787₹463₹428FY16FY21FY26
FY26: CFO = 170% of profit (three-year rate 127%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
248%201%154%107%60%%170%FY16FY21FY26
248%201%154%107%60%%170%FY16FY21FY26

Why conversion sits at 127%: the cash cycle stretched 252 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Cyient Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 119 days in FY26, up from −133 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹1,032 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹7,268 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹19.9 Cr, so roughly ₹2,370 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 66 days, inventory at 303 days — roughly 10.0 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 119 days, looser than FY21's −133.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 303 days to sell; customers pay about 66 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 249 days — netting out to the 119-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹7,268 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹19.9 Cr — so the 119-day loop keeps roughly ₹2,370 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 119-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 13-year window.
+252 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
674402131−140−412days119d303d66d249dFY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
674402131−140−412days119d303d66d249dFY14FY20FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹1,032 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹812 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹5.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹359 Cr, work-in-progress ₹5.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
steady investment
CapexWork-in-progress
1.9k1.4k863337−188₹ Cr₹359₹5FY16FY18FY21FY23FY26
1.9k1.4k863337−188₹ Cr₹359₹5FY16FY21FY26

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Cyient Ltd earns a ROCE of 12% in FY26. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 6.4% net margin on 0.88× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 12%.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 6.4% net margin × 0.88× asset turns × 1.45× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 8.2% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

FY26: ROCE 12% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line). 13-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the full ladder
ROCEWACC
26%22%19%15%11%%12%FY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
26%22%19%15%11%%12%FY14FY20FY26

The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 16% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Cyient Ltd carries ₹431 Cr of borrowings against ₹5,682 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.08. Operating profit covers the interest bill 15×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹577 Cr to ₹431 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹1,032 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹431 Cr against equity of ₹5,682 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.08. Operating profit covers the interest bill 15×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹577 Cr to ₹431 Cr while capital spending ran ₹1,032 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

FY26: borrowings ₹431 Cr at 0.08× equity Borrowings by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 13-year window. Quarterly balance-sheet history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
debt is falling while the business grows
BorrowingsDebt-to-equity
1.3k0.4×9870.3×6580.2×3290.1×00.0×₹ Cr×₹4310.08×FY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
1.3k0.4×9870.3×6580.2×3290.1×00.0×₹ Cr×₹4310.08×FY14FY20FY26

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 16% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions cut 13.9 points of Cyient Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 14.5% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +7.8 points over the same window, to 37.5%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −13.9 points over 8 quarters to 14.5%; Domestic institutions: +7.8 points over 8 quarters to 37.5%; Promoters: +1.6 points over 8 quarters to 24.7%.

Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −13.9 points against domestic institutions +7.8 points over 8 quarters, with promoters +1.6 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +0.1 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
43%36%28%21%13%%23.3%15.3%41.0%19.8%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
43%36%28%21%13%%23.3%15.3%41.0%19.8%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Foreign institutions cut 13.9 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
43%35%28%20%12%%24.7%14.5%37.5%22.7%Sep 23Mar 25Jul 26
43%35%28%20%12%%24.7%14.5%37.5%22.7%Sep 23Mar 25Jul 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Cyient Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · IT - ER&D
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Persistent Systems LtdPERSISTENT 71.2/100Favorable setup90% evidence TURNING 29.2/35 Revenue 23.6% · PAT 33.1% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence 17.6/25 ROCE 34.4% · OPM 19% 100% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 45.4× · PEG 1.23 100% evidence 15.2/20 RS sector 16.4% · RS bench 0.7% · 1Y 7.7%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 29.2 + 17.6 + 9.2 + 15.2 = 71.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Onward Technologies LtdONWARDTEC 58.8/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence TURNING 21.9/35 Revenue 10.7% · PAT 30.3% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 22.9% · OPM 12% 95% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 14.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.4/20 RS sector 0.6% · RS bench 0.9% · 1Y -13.4%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.9 + 14 + 11.5 + 11.4 = 58.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3L&T Technology Services LtdLTTS 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence ASLEEP 19.9/35 Revenue 10.1% · PAT 4.4% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence 16.3/25 ROCE 26.7% · OPM 19% 100% evidence 6.5/20 P/E 28.1× · PEG 3.84 100% evidence 10.9/20 RS sector 2.4% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y -15.8%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.9 + 16.3 + 6.5 + 10.9 = 53.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
4Tata Elxsi LtdTATAELXSI 48.3/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence BASING 19.0/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT 41.1% · OPM change 0.2 pp 95% evidence 19.3/25 ROCE 60% · OPM 21.1% 95% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 224× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.5/20 RS sector -15% · RS bench -24.9% · 1Y -39.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 19.3 + 8.5 + 1.5 = 48.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Tata Technologies LtdTATATECH 44.2/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence TURNING 13.0/35 Revenue 15.2% · PAT -18.5% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 11.2/25 ROCE 20.9% · OPM 16% 100% evidence 4.0/20 P/E 46.6× · PEG 4.06 100% evidence 16.0/20 RS sector 6.7% · RS bench 11.7% · 1Y 5.5%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13 + 11.2 + 4 + 16 = 44.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 11.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
6KPIT Technologies LtdKPITTECH 33.5/100Adverse evidence94% evidence ASLEEP 6.2/35 Revenue 9.6% · PAT -28.1% · OPM change -4 pp 100% evidence 15.6/25 ROCE 26.3% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 26.3× · PEG 6.64 100% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -23.3% · RS bench -37.9% · 1Y -51.2%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 6.2 + 15.6 + 8.7 + 3 = 33.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7Cyient Ltdthis pageCYIENT 32.3/100Adverse evidence76% evidence ASLEEP 8.7/35 Revenue 3.2% · PAT -36.9% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence 7.9/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 13% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 23.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -9.7% · RS bench -18.4% · 1Y -31.8%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 8.7 + 7.9 + 9.7 + 6 = 32.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Cyient Ltd's share price today?

Cyient Ltd trades at ₹848, −28.3% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹9,421 Cr. The stock sits at 14% of its 52-week range of ₹785–₹1,242, −14.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 79 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were Cyient Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Cyient Ltd reported revenue of ₹2,076 Cr and net profit of ₹109 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 21.3% and profit fell 30.6% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹9.37. The operating margin was 13.0%, 0.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient Ltd's revenue?

Cyient Ltd reported revenue of ₹2,076 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +21.3% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹7,268 Cr (−1.2%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 8.9% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient Ltd's profit?

Cyient Ltd earned ₹109 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −30.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹463 Cr. The operating margin ran 13.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient Ltd's market cap?

Cyient Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹9,421 Cr at a share price of ₹848. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient Ltd's P/E ratio?

Cyient Ltd trades at a P/E of 23.1×, at the 72nd percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 18.9×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Cyient Ltd pay a dividend?

Yes — Cyient Ltd's dividend payout was 42% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Cyient Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 23.1× sits at the 72nd percentile of its 10-year range (long-run median 18.9×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient Ltd growing?

Yes — Cyient Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +21.3% year on year, profit −30.6%, and the margin +0.0 pp at 13.0%. The 10-year compound rates are 8.9% (revenue) and 3.8% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.

How is Cyient Ltd performing?

Cyient Ltd is in a downtrend, 79 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 21.3% and profit fell 30.6% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 6 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

What stage is Cyient Ltd in?

Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −36.9% latest against +1.9% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 12.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +3.2% latest, profit growth −36.9% latest, eps growth −39.6% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient Ltd in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 79 of stage 4), trading −14.5% versus its 200-day average and at 14% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Cyient Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-25), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +110% against the NIFTY 500's +276% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.

Will Cyient Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Cyient Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹848, the price is in a downtrend 79 weeks in. Its P/E of 23.1× sits at the 72nd percentile of its own 10-year range. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns Cyient Ltd?

Promoters hold 24.7% of Cyient Ltd, foreign institutions 14.5%, domestic institutions 37.5% and the public 22.7% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions cut 13.9 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Cyient Ltd have too much debt?

No — Cyient Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.08, and operating profit covers the interest bill 15×. FY26 borrowings were ₹431 Cr against equity of ₹5,682 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient Ltd's capex?

Cyient Ltd spent ₹1,032 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹359 Cr, with ₹5.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient Ltd's cash flow?

Cyient Ltd generated ₹787 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹428 Cr of free cash flow after ₹359 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹463 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient Ltd's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 127% of Cyient Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹787 Cr against reported profit of ₹463 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is Cyient Ltd in its business cycle?

Cyient Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 12.0%, against a 13-year band of 12.0%–19.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 13.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the Cyient Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: Foreign institutions moved −13.9 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Cyient Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI