Onward Technologies Ltd (ONWARDTEC) — share price & stock analysis
Profits are up 29% in two years, the share price is running behind the results, and it still trades cheap against its own history.
Onward Technologies Ltd (ONWARDTEC) trades at ₹289 as of 1 July 2026, down 14% over the past year — trailing NIFTY 500 for 23 weeks. The machine reads this as steady growth, cheap vs history: profits are up 29% in two years, the share price is running behind the results, and it still trades cheap against its own history. It trades at a P/E of 13.8× (the 18th percentile of its own range); the price is in Stage 4 — declining, 40 weeks in; the business cycle reads DEEP CYCLICAL / EXPANSION. Fundamentals-momentum score: 56/100 (mixed).
Data as of 1 July 2026 · every number traces to its Screener source column · not investment advice.
- Market cap
- ₹643 Cr
- P/E
- 13.8×
- ROE
- 19.5%
- vs own 10-yr valuation
- 18th pctile
- Book value / share
- ₹111
- EPS (TTM)
- ₹20.5
- 10-yr median P/E
- 27.1×
- Revenue (FY26)
- ₹544 Cr
- Profit after tax (FY26)
- ₹44 Cr
- Weinstein stage
- Stage 4 (40 weeks)
- Data as of
- 1 July 2026
Profits swing violently in this business — margins swinging 9 points peak to trough. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.net_profit
Where the clock stands now: earnings sit at 100% of their historical range, margins are the best ever printed, and the market pays the cheap end of its range (18th percentile). That reads as EXPANSION — the comfortable middle — but the records are already on the table; from here the bet is that they keep coming.net_profit
One tension to hold: the margins are the best this company has ever printed while the market still prices the stock at the cheap end of its own history. Either the market is late — or it remembers how cycles in this industry end. That disagreement is the actual bet.
3 of the 6 things we track are currently moving the right way — most of the dashboard is turning up.
Where the levels actually stand: ROCE 23% — a high-quality engine; effectively no debt; margins at an all-time high. Momentum says which way things are moving; these say where they are.
Read this number for what it is: it measures the DIRECTION of change, not the quality of the business. A mediocre business getting better scores high here; a great one having a soft quarter scores low. Profit, sales and margins count double.
The business grew faster than the stock
Since Mar 2016, earnings per share grew 836% while the stock is up 319%. The business has outrun its own share price.pricettm_eps
When profits grow faster than the price, the stock quietly gets cheaper while doing better — the market hasn’t fully caught up.
Today’s P/E of 13.8× sits near the bottom of its own range — it has been cheaper than this only 18% of the time against its own 10-year history.pe_ratio
And the sharper caveat: today’s margins are the best this company has ever printed. The cheap multiple is only real if they hold — earnings at record profitability flatter every valuation ratio.operating_profit
Data: Price, EPS and valuation (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | EPS (TTM) (₹) | P/E (×) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16 | 66.7 | – | 20.7 |
| May 16 | 69.7 | 2.2 | 31.8 |
| Jul 16 | 70.8 | 1.4 | 51.3 |
| Sep 16 | 66.4 | – | 166.0 |
| Dec 16 | 59.4 | – | 148.4 |
| Feb 17 | 68.7 | – | 156.1 |
| Apr 17 | 75.8 | – | 24.9 |
| Jun 17 | 86.2 | – | 28.4 |
| Aug 17 | 91.7 | 3.6 | 25.8 |
| Oct 17 | 159 | 5.2 | 44.8 |
| Dec 17 | 137 | 5.2 | 26.4 |
| Feb 18 | 96.3 | 4.1 | 23.6 |
| Apr 18 | 93.0 | 4.1 | 22.8 |
| Jun 18 | 80.5 | 4.4 | 18.4 |
| Aug 18 | 68.7 | 4.4 | 15.7 |
| Oct 18 | 56.5 | – | 15.6 |
| Dec 18 | 58.6 | – | 16.2 |
| Mar 19 | 59.8 | 5.2 | 11.6 |
| May 19 | 52.0 | 5.2 | 10.1 |
| Jul 19 | 67.3 | 6.4 | 10.5 |
| Sep 19 | 60.0 | 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Nov 19 | 66.0 | 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Jan 20 | 64.0 | – | 8.1 |
| Mar 20 | 56.3 | – | 7.2 |
| May 20 | 40.5 | 3.9 | 10.3 |
| Jul 20 | 58.2 | 2.1 | 28.4 |
| Sep 20 | 63.9 | 2.1 | 31.1 |
| Nov 20 | 64.0 | – | 38.3 |
| Jan 21 | 86.8 | – | 65.2 |
| Mar 21 | 112 | – | 84.2 |
| May 21 | 191 | 4.5 | 42.3 |
| Jul 21 | 251 | 9.9 | 25.3 |
| Oct 21 | 227 | 9.9 | 22.9 |
| Dec 21 | 267 | 11.6 | 23.0 |
| Feb 22 | 389 | – | 31.3 |
| Apr 22 | 398 | – | 32.0 |
| Jun 22 | 303 | – | 24.1 |
| Aug 22 | 253 | 7.5 | 33.9 |
| Oct 22 | 260 | 7.5 | 34.9 |
| Dec 22 | 318 | – | 70.0 |
| Feb 23 | 303 | – | 89.6 |
| Apr 23 | 327 | – | 96.8 |
| Jun 23 | 480 | 5.0 | 93.0 |
| Aug 23 | 554 | 9.5 | 58.4 |
| Oct 23 | 503 | 13.5 | 37.3 |
| Dec 23 | 625 | 13.5 | 46.4 |
| Mar 24 | 537 | 15.4 | 34.9 |
| May 24 | 452 | 15.4 | 29.4 |
| Jul 24 | 418 | 15.0 | 27.9 |
| Sep 24 | 416 | 13.4 | 31.0 |
| Nov 24 | 337 | 10.7 | 31.5 |
| Jan 25 | 312 | 10.7 | 29.1 |
| Mar 25 | 264 | 10.4 | 25.5 |
| May 25 | 313 | 12.0 | 26.2 |
| Jul 25 | 365 | 14.4 | 25.3 |
| Sep 25 | 316 | 14.4 | 21.9 |
| Nov 25 | 282 | 18.1 | 15.6 |
| Jan 26 | 301 | 20.9 | 14.4 |
| Mar 26 | 225 | 20.9 | 10.8 |
| May 26 | 265 | 20.5 | 12.9 |
| Jul 26 | 289 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
Price is the weekly close (₹). EPS is trailing-twelve-month profit per share, anchored on Screener's own snapshots; between snapshots it is filled from price ÷ P/E (an exact identity), and any fill straying more than 18% from the neighbouring snapshots is dropped rather than shown. The lower panel is the P/E — what the market pays per rupee of profit; the dotted line is its long-run median (27.1×).
The price is in a downtrend — fighting it is expensive
STAGE 4 · DECLINING · 40 WEEKSPrice trends have a life cycle: they base (1), advance (2), top out (3) and decline (4). This chart is in Stage 4: declining — 40 weeks so far, confirmed.stage
The price is below its falling 200-day average — history says most of the damage in stocks happens here. Cheap can get cheaper in Stage 4.dma_200
Trailing NIFTY 500 for 23 weeks — relative strength is the market’s live opinion, and right now it is against it.rs_mansfield
What would end it: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the house exit rule — mechanical, no debates.dma_200
Data: Weekly price, moving averages and stage (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | 200-DMA (₹) | 50-DMA (₹) | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16 | 69.5 | 74.0 | 75.7 | 4 |
| Jun 16 | 67.3 | 72.8 | 71.5 | 4 |
| Aug 16 | 72.3 | 71.7 | 70.4 | 4 |
| Nov 16 | 61.2 | 69.9 | 66.9 | 4 |
| Feb 17 | 67.0 | 68.2 | 67.5 | 4 |
| May 17 | 84.7 | 72.4 | 79.8 | 2 |
| Jul 17 | 100 | 79.7 | 90.6 | 2 |
| Oct 17 | 141 | 97.4 | 125 | 2 |
| Jan 18 | 128 | 114 | 133 | 2 |
| Apr 18 | 93.5 | 108 | 100 | 4 |
| Jun 18 | 72.2 | 97.3 | 84.0 | 4 |
| Sep 18 | 67.2 | 85.9 | 71.4 | 4 |
| Dec 18 | 57.0 | 73.3 | 57.1 | 4 |
| Mar 19 | 60.9 | 67.9 | 60.3 | 4 |
| May 19 | 60.8 | 64.1 | 58.4 | 4 |
| Aug 19 | 59.1 | 64.6 | 63.7 | 1 |
| Nov 19 | 69.3 | 64.4 | 65.0 | 1 |
| Feb 20 | 67.8 | 65.0 | 65.0 | 2 |
| Apr 20 | 41.5 | 58.6 | 48.5 | 4 |
| Jul 20 | 66.3 | 55.5 | 54.5 | 4 |
| Oct 20 | 64.3 | 59.3 | 63.3 | 2 |
| Jan 21 | 107 | 66.8 | 81.5 | 2 |
| Apr 21 | 124 | 83.4 | 107 | 2 |
| Jun 21 | 197 | 114 | 162 | 2 |
| Sep 21 | 228 | 167 | 228 | 2 |
| Dec 21 | 277 | 198 | 243 | 2 |
| Mar 22 | 286 | 252 | 315 | 2 |
| May 22 | 289 | 289 | 325 | 2 |
| Aug 22 | 266 | 282 | 274 | 4 |
| Nov 22 | 263 | 271 | 262 | 4 |
| Feb 23 | 300 | 290 | 307 | 2 |
| Apr 23 | 328 | 295 | 309 | 2 |
| Jul 23 | 561 | 376 | 487 | 2 |
| Oct 23 | 559 | 460 | 559 | 2 |
| Jan 24 | 615 | 515 | 599 | 2 |
| Mar 24 | 443 | 523 | 515 | 4 |
| Jun 24 | 407 | 484 | 428 | 4 |
| Sep 24 | 420 | 458 | 424 | 4 |
| Dec 24 | 342 | 416 | 356 | 4 |
| Feb 25 | 285 | 365 | 299 | 4 |
| May 25 | 296 | 321 | 267 | 4 |
| Aug 25 | 315 | 324 | 325 | 2 |
| Nov 25 | 296 | 319 | 311 | 4 |
| Feb 26 | 348 | 308 | 300 | 4 |
| May 26 | 276 | 284 | 254 | 4 |
| Jul 26 | 289 | 278 | 262 | 4 |
Profits are at an all-time high
Over 12 years, sales went from ₹167 Cr to ₹544 Cr (about 10% a year), and profit from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹44.0 Cr.revenuenet_profit
Margins widened 7.8 points along the way — growth with improving economics.operating_profit
Data: Revenue by year
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 167 |
| FY15 | 189 |
| FY16 | 198 |
| FY17 | 224 |
| FY18 | 244 |
| FY19 | 261 |
| FY20 | 272 |
| FY21 | 240 |
| FY22 | 307 |
| FY23 | 441 |
| FY24 | 472 |
| FY25 | 491 |
| FY26 | 544 |
Data: Profit by year
| Period | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 0 |
| FY15 | 3 |
| FY16 | 3 |
| FY17 | 4 |
| FY18 | 7 |
| FY19 | 10 |
| FY20 | 6 |
| FY21 | 7 |
| FY22 | 24 |
| FY23 | 11 |
| FY24 | 34 |
| FY25 | 27 |
| FY26 | 44 |
Data: OPM % by year
| Period | OPM % (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 5.4 |
| FY15 | 6.9 |
| FY16 | 7.1 |
| FY17 | 4.9 |
| FY18 | 4.5 |
| FY19 | 8.4 |
| FY20 | 8.5 |
| FY21 | 7.1 |
| FY22 | 7.2 |
| FY23 | 6.1 |
| FY24 | 11.0 |
| FY25 | 9.2 |
| FY26 | 13.2 |
Sales have gone quiet — growth has stalled
Mar 26 sales were ₹137 Cr, up 8% on the same quarter last year.revenue
That makes 7 quarters of growth in a row — this is a trend, not a blip.revenue
Data: Quarterly sales
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 120 | – |
| Sep 23 | 120 | – |
| Dec 23 | 114 | – |
| Mar 24 | 118 | – |
| Jun 24 | 118 | -1.7 |
| Sep 24 | 123 | 2.3 |
| Dec 24 | 123 | 8.2 |
| Mar 25 | 127 | 7.5 |
| Jun 25 | 133 | 13.2 |
| Sep 25 | 139 | 12.9 |
| Dec 25 | 135 | 9.1 |
| Mar 26 | 137 | 7.7 |
Margins have been rebuilt — 6.1% in FY23 to 13.2% now
Of every ₹100 of sales, the company keeps ₹11.2 as operating profit (a year ago it kept ₹10.9).opm_pct
Zoom out and this is the page's quiet hero: annual operating margin bottomed at 6.1% in FY23 and has been rebuilt to 13.2% — that recovery, not sales alone, is what powers the profit growth elsewhere on this page.operating_profit
Data: Three margins, quarterly
| Period | Gross (%) | Operating (%) | Net (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 100 | 13.9 | 9.1 |
| Sep 23 | 100 | 12.6 | 8.0 |
| Dec 23 | 100 | 9.4 | 6.0 |
| Mar 24 | 100 | 8.2 | 5.6 |
| Jun 24 | 100 | 10.0 | 6.0 |
| Sep 24 | 100 | 6.5 | 2.9 |
| Dec 24 | 100 | 9.1 | 4.9 |
| Mar 25 | 100 | 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Jun 25 | 100 | 12.9 | 9.6 |
| Sep 25 | 100 | 14.3 | 8.6 |
| Dec 25 | 100 | 14.5 | 9.2 |
| Mar 26 | 100 | 11.2 | 7.0 |
Profit declined 8% last quarter
Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹9.6 Cr, down 8% year on year.net_profit
Data: Quarterly profit after tax
| Period | PAT (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 11.0 | – |
| Sep 23 | 10.0 | – |
| Dec 23 | 7.0 | – |
| Mar 24 | 7.0 | – |
| Jun 24 | 7.0 | -34.8 |
| Sep 24 | 4.0 | -63.0 |
| Dec 24 | 6.0 | -11.0 |
| Mar 25 | 10.0 | 55.8 |
| Jun 25 | 13.0 | 79.5 |
| Sep 25 | 12.0 | 237.3 |
| Dec 25 | 10.0 | 67.2 |
| Mar 26 | 10.0 | -8.3 |
The single biggest driver was selling more — working against the move, not for it.
Data: Where the profit change came from (Mar 25 → Mar 26)
| Component | Effect (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| PAT Mar 25 | 10 |
| More sales | +1 |
| Fatter margins | +0 |
| Other income | −1 |
| Depreciation | −1 |
| Interest | −0 |
| Tax | −0 |
| PAT Mar 26 | 10 |
The profits are real — they turn into cash
Over the last 5 profitable years, the business reported ₹140 Cr of profit and collected ₹161 Cr of operating cash — about 115% conversion.operating_cash_flownet_profit
When cash tracks profit this closely, the earnings need no asterisk.
Data: Cash collected vs profit reported (annual)
| Period | Operating cash flow (₹ Cr) | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 3.0 | 0.0 |
| FY15 | 15.0 | 3.0 |
| FY16 | 10.0 | 3.0 |
| FY17 | 14.0 | 4.0 |
| FY18 | 16.0 | 7.0 |
| FY19 | 11.0 | 10.0 |
| FY20 | 29.0 | 6.0 |
| FY21 | 33.0 | 7.0 |
| FY22 | -4.0 | 24.0 |
| FY23 | 6.0 | 11.0 |
| FY24 | 62.0 | 34.0 |
| FY25 | 32.0 | 27.0 |
| FY26 | 65.0 | 44.0 |
The cash cycle is stable
One rupee now takes about 81 days to go out the door as materials and come back as collected cash.cash_conversion_cycle
Data: Days of cash locked up (annual)
| Period | Customers owe (debtor days) (days) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 86.0 |
| FY15 | 75.0 |
| FY16 | 71.0 |
| FY17 | 79.0 |
| FY18 | 68.0 |
| FY19 | 68.0 |
| FY20 | 67.0 |
| FY21 | 62.0 |
| FY22 | 79.0 |
| FY23 | 91.0 |
| FY24 | 78.0 |
| FY25 | 81.0 |
| FY26 | 81.0 |
The asset base keeps compounding — this company builds
The productive asset base has gone from ₹12.0 Cr (FY14) to ₹89.0 Cr.fixed_assetscwip
The build is self-funded: the last 3 years' investing outflow (₹100 Cr) fits inside the operating cash the business generated (₹159 Cr).investing_cash_flowoperating_cash_flow
Data: Assets in place vs under construction (annual)
| Period | Fixed assets (₹ Cr) | Under construction (CWIP) (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 12.0 | 0.0 |
| FY15 | 12.0 | 0.0 |
| FY16 | 11.0 | 0.0 |
| FY17 | 18.0 | 0.0 |
| FY18 | 16.0 | 0.0 |
| FY19 | 15.0 | 0.0 |
| FY20 | 28.0 | 0.0 |
| FY21 | 30.0 | 0.0 |
| FY22 | 57.0 | 0.0 |
| FY23 | 54.0 | 0.0 |
| FY24 | 63.0 | 1.0 |
| FY25 | 65.0 | 2.0 |
| FY26 | 89.0 | 0.0 |
Almost no debt — this company cannot be killed by a bad year
For every ₹100 shareholders have put in (and left in), the company has borrowed ₹16.borrowings
Data: Total borrowings (annual)
| Period | Borrowings (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 37.0 |
| FY15 | 29.0 |
| FY16 | 23.0 |
| FY17 | 25.0 |
| FY18 | 23.0 |
| FY19 | 18.0 |
| FY20 | 35.0 |
| FY21 | 25.0 |
| FY22 | 19.0 |
| FY23 | 17.0 |
| FY24 | 28.0 |
| FY25 | 32.0 |
| FY26 | 40.0 |
Data: Debt vs shareholders’ money (annual)
| Period | Debt ÷ equity (x) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 1.4 |
| FY15 | 0.9 |
| FY16 | 0.6 |
| FY17 | 0.6 |
| FY18 | 0.5 |
| FY19 | 0.3 |
| FY20 | 0.5 |
| FY21 | 0.3 |
| FY22 | 0.1 |
| FY23 | 0.1 |
| FY24 | 0.1 |
| FY25 | 0.1 |
| FY26 | 0.2 |
Every ₹100 kept in the business now earns ₹23 — and the number is rising
Return on capital employed is 23.0% (a year ago: 16.0%). This is the single best test of business quality: what the company earns on the money it keeps.roce_pct
Rising returns on capital while growing is the rarest combination in investing — it means the new projects earn more than the old ones.roce_pct
Data: Returns on capital (annual)
| Period | ROCE (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 10.0 |
| FY15 | 14.0 |
| FY16 | 19.0 |
| FY17 | 15.0 |
| FY18 | 15.0 |
| FY19 | 24.0 |
| FY20 | 14.0 |
| FY21 | 12.0 |
| FY22 | 23.0 |
| FY23 | 10.0 |
| FY24 | 22.0 |
| FY25 | 16.0 |
| FY26 | 23.0 |
Institutions bought the story, then started backing away
Promoters hold 40.0% (up 2.1 points over 8 quarters). Foreign funds own 9.3%, domestic funds 1.8%.promoters_pctfiis_pctdiis_pct
Data: Who holds the shares, quarterly
| Period | Promoters (%) | Foreign funds (%) | Domestic funds (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23 | 45.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| Dec 23 | 38.2 | 2.1 | 6.2 |
| Mar 24 | 38.1 | 2.5 | 7.7 |
| Jun 24 | 38.0 | 1.6 | 7.6 |
| Sep 24 | 37.9 | 9.0 | 7.4 |
| Dec 24 | 37.9 | 9.2 | 6.4 |
| Mar 25 | 38.7 | 9.3 | 3.9 |
| Jun 25 | 39.0 | 9.3 | 3.7 |
| Sep 25 | 39.0 | 9.2 | 4.0 |
| Dec 25 | 39.1 | 9.4 | 2.9 |
| Mar 26 | 39.1 | 9.8 | 3.5 |
| Jun 26 | 40.0 | 9.3 | 1.8 |
- There is no debt story here. Borrowings are ₹16 per ₹100 of shareholders’ money — too small to matter, in either direction.borrowings
- Foreign funds have neither piled in nor fled — their stake has held near 9.3% for 8 quarters. No smart-money signal, in either direction.fiis_pct
A good business — the question is the price
The numbers are genuinely mixed, and the price hasn’t fully caught up with the improvement.
Best thing in the data: free cash flow rising (₹15.0 Cr → ₹44.0 Cr).operating_cash_flow
Biggest worry: domestic-fund holding falling (3.7% → 1.8%).diis_pct
Machine-written research from Screener data — every number traces to its source column. Sector Alpha is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser; nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell. Not investment advice.
Straight answers from the data
What does Onward Technologies Ltd do?
Incorporated in 1991, Onward Technologies is a software and technology services outsourcing company specializing in digital, embedded, mechanical engineering for global original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in Industrial Equipment, Heavy Machinery, Power Generation, Renewables, Hydro Energy, Construction, Agricultural and Mining Equipment, Automotive, Rail Transportation Healthcare and Life Sciences.[1]. It is listed in the IT - ER&D sector with a market capitalisation of ₹643 Cr.
What is Onward Technologies Ltd's share price?
As of 1 July 2026, Onward Technologies Ltd trades at ₹289, down 14% over the past year, with a market capitalisation of ₹643 Cr. Trailing NIFTY 500 for 23 weeks. Prices are weekly closes from Screener data; this page refreshes with each weekly update.
What is Onward Technologies Ltd's share price target?
Sector Alpha does not publish broker-style price targets. Our discounted-cash-flow model estimates Onward Technologies Ltd's intrinsic value at ₹844 per share under base assumptions (bear ₹308, bull ₹870), against the current price of ₹289 — a 234% margin of safety. The current price already implies roughly 5% annual earnings growth. These are model estimates, not forecasts — treat them as one input alongside the valuation history below, not as a target.
Is Onward Technologies Ltd stock overvalued or undervalued?
Onward Technologies Ltd trades at a P/E of 13.8× — the 18th percentile of its own 10.3-year trading range (median 27.1×), which is cheap against its own history. The business grew faster than the stock. Since Mar 2016, earnings per share grew 836% while the stock is up 319%. The business has outrun its own share price. One caveat: margins are currently above their own all-time band, so the earnings behind that multiple may themselves be at a cyclical high — the stock is cheaper than its history partly because the E is fatter than usual.
What did Onward Technologies Ltd report in its latest quarterly results?
In its most recent reported quarter (Q4 FY26, quarter ended March 2026): Mar 26 sales were ₹137 Cr, up 8% on the same quarter last year. Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹9.6 Cr, down 8% year on year. Figures are from Screener-scraped quarterly filings; the page updates when the next quarter is filed.
Is Onward Technologies Ltd growing?
Sales have gone quiet — growth has stalled. Mar 26 sales were ₹137 Cr, up 8% on the same quarter last year.
Are Onward Technologies Ltd's profits growing?
Profit declined 8% last quarter. Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹9.6 Cr, down 8% year on year.
What are Onward Technologies Ltd's operating margins?
Margins have been rebuilt — 6.1% in FY23 to 13.2% now. In the most recent quarter, of every ₹100 of sales, the company keeps ₹11.2 as operating profit (a year ago it kept ₹10.9).
What is Onward Technologies Ltd's long-term growth record?
Revenue grew from ₹167 Cr in FY14 to ₹544 Cr in FY26 — a 10.3% compound annual growth rate over 12 years.
Is Onward Technologies Ltd stock in an uptrend?
The price is in a downtrend — fighting it is expensive. Onward Technologies Ltd is in Stage 4 — declining, 40 weeks in (confirmed). Stages follow Stan Weinstein's four-phase read of weekly price against the 200-day average: basing (1), advancing (2), topping (3), declining (4).
Why is Onward Technologies Ltd stock falling?
The price is down 14% over the past year and the chart is in Weinstein Stage 4 (declining) — trading below its 200-day average, with the P/E at the 18th percentile of its own range. Since Mar 2016, earnings per share grew 836% while the stock is up 319%. The business has outrun its own share price.
Is Onward Technologies Ltd beating the NIFTY 500?
No — trailing NIFTY 500 for 23 weeks, as of 1 July 2026. Relative strength is measured weekly against the NIFTY 500 (Mansfield RS): a positive reading means the stock has outperformed the index over the trailing window, week after week.
Where is Onward Technologies Ltd in its business cycle?
The data reads Onward Technologies Ltd as a deep cyclical business currently in its expansion phase — earnings at an all-time high for this company, valuation at the 18th percentile. Profits swing violently in this business — margins swinging 9 points peak to trough. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.
Who owns Onward Technologies Ltd — what is the promoter holding?
Promoters hold 40.0% (up 2.1 points over 8 quarters). Foreign funds own 9.3%, domestic funds 1.8%. Shareholding is from Screener's quarterly filings data.
Does Onward Technologies Ltd have too much debt?
Almost no debt — this company cannot be killed by a bad year. For every ₹100 shareholders have put in (and left in), the company has borrowed ₹16.
What is the bull case for Onward Technologies Ltd?
Profits are up 29% in two years, the share price is running behind the results, and it still trades cheap against its own history. Best thing in the data: free cash flow rising (₹15.0 Cr → ₹44.0 Cr). Sales have gone quiet — growth has stalled.
What is the bear case for Onward Technologies Ltd — what could break the story?
Biggest worry: domestic-fund holding falling (3.7% → 1.8%). Two quarters of returns on capital reversing would kill this story. This falsification condition is stated up front so the thesis can be checked against incoming quarters, not defended after the fact.
Is Onward Technologies Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
Sector Alpha does not publish buy or sell recommendations — this is a research read, not advice. What the data says: a good business — the question is the price. The numbers are genuinely mixed, and the price hasn’t fully caught up with the improvement. Across the 7-model scorecard the composite research signal is on watch at 67% confidence. This is machine-written research compiled from Screener data — every number traces to its source — and it is not investment advice. Do your own diligence.