Ceigall India share price today

Ceigall India Ltd's share price was ₹386.85 at the close on 5 November 2026. It has been rising for 37 weeks. That is 13.9% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹233 and ₹392, and at that close it sat 97% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Ceigall India Ltd is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 7 weeks in a row.

Over the last 2.2 years the share price moved −3% while the NIFTY 500 moved −3%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

One change stood out: revenue up on a year earlier for 9 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare).

1. Revenue up on a year earlier for 9 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare)

   In the June 2026 quarter revenue was ₹970 crore, +15.8% on a year earlier.

   Why: Revenue rose because the company got more work done on its projects.

   Next results: check whether the highway projects VRK 11/12 and Southern Ludhiana get past land issues and start adding to reported revenue.

   From the earnings call on 10 Aug 2026.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), Ceigall India reported revenue of ₹1,022 crore, up 26.6% from ₹807 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹92.0 crore, up 64.3% from ₹56.0 crore.

Ceigall India results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

The newest call in our records is from 10 August 2026, about April to June 2026; a call about these results is not in our records yet.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Ceigall India closed at ₹386.85 on 5 November 2026, up 55.5% from ₹248.80 a year earlier (7 November 2025). Its highest weekly close since August 2024 was ₹400.95 on 23 August 2024.

Ceigall India share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 5 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

124 weekly closes from 9 August 2024 to 5 November 2026.

5 Nov 2026: Ceigall India closed at ₹386.85, down 0.9% on the week and up 4.8% on the month. Our read, 10 Oct 2026: Project starts are translating order visibility into earnings, but cash collection and HAM sale receipts determine whether the expansion can finance itself.

Earlier

• Results for July to September 2026: Revenue up 26.6% and profit up 64.3% on a year earlier.
• 11 Sep 2026: ex-date for a dividend of ₹0.50 a share.
• 10 Aug 2026: Ceigall India held its results call for April to June 2026. Management guided: FY27 revenue growth at minimum 15%.

Our read of the business

April to June 2026: New project starts support growth; payment conditions still matter.

Our read after the April to June 2026 results, written 10 October 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

Ceigall India paid ₹0.50 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 5 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 0.13% at the ₹386.85 close on 5 November 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹0.50 a share, ex-date 11 September 2026.

Ceigall India dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Not in its latest year. Ceigall India Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in FY26. It did pay a dividend in 1 of its last 7 reported years, so there is a history but no current dividend.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for April to June 2026, held on 10 August 2026, Ceigall India's management guided: FY27 revenue growth at minimum 15%.

“Our projects that are going to be completed will be sold; we are very clear about that.”Ramnik Sehgal, on the call for April to June 2026

What management guided

• FY27 operating margin maintained at 11-12.5%.
• FY27 order inflow of ₹6,000 crore; remaining inflow achievable during the year after close to ₹600 crore received.
• FY27 VRK 11/12 execution planned at 20-25%; Bihar AD expected in Q3, Punjab by Q4, with work starting within 2-3 months after FC.
• Ludhiana FY27 execution planned at least 15% because only 62% land is available.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for April to June 2026, 10 August 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

The changes showing up in Ceigall India's own numbers are a bigger order book. It is too early to say whether they last.

We check 16 kinds of change in every company, such as costs spread over more sales, higher-value products, new orders, new regions or falling debt, against its reported numbers and what management said on its calls. Only changes the numbers back are shown.

Checked against results and calls up to April to June 2026, 10 October 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

Land or financial-close prerequisites prevent mobilisation after appointed dates, or execution fails to become billable.

Each change stops working if

• Appointed-date conversion: Land or financial-close prerequisites prevent mobilisation after appointed dates, or execution fails to become billable.
• Solar execution broadens revenue: Transmission or project readiness blocks mobilisation, or renewable execution displaces road work without adding attributable earnings.
• HAM capital recycling: Disposal receipts arrive after equity commitments fall due or disposal economics fail to release usable capital.

The main risks

• Debt-funded earnings: Accounting growth has not established operating cash generation. ⚠ estimate
• External prerequisites delay conversion: Land, appointed dates and transmission can delay revenue despite orders. ⚠ estimate
• Equity commitments outrun recycling: New project equity may fall due before disposal cash arrives. ⚠ estimate
• Moving goals and unresolved baselines: Execution progress coexists with changed goals and inconsistent explanations. ⚠ estimate

Our read after the April to June 2026 results, written 10 October 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

When Ceigall India reports October to December 2026, these are the 5 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Revenue for Sep 2026 grows at least 15% over Sep 2025 (807) with operating margin at or above 14%, and FY27 half-year orders move clearly past ₹600 crore toward the ₹6,000 crore goal.

Ceigall India is on 3 of our India lists: Multibagger study list, Momentum stocks and 52 week high & low.

Ceigall India Ltd earned ₹92.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, +64.3% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 4th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹309 Cr. Over 6 years profit has grown 23.1% a year on average. That is 9.0% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹56.0 Cr.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹309 Cr (+7.7% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +26.6% on a year earlier and the margin moved +3.0 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +42.6% and revenue +24.7%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

Ceigall India Ltd reported ₹1,022 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +26.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 10th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 6 years it has grown 31.1% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹4,022 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Why this happened. The latest summary identifies Maharashtra solar starts and progress on other solar projects. This broadens the revenue pool, but transmission remains a condition for further mobilisation. The Value Chain Climb is not established: management guides renewable margins at parity, so the model assumes additional execution rather than a separate margin premium.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹4,370 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹4,022 Cr, +17.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +24.7% on average, against 31.1% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +25.3%, against +16.3% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +42.8%, against +4.0% a year (accelerating).

Ceigall India Ltd's operating margin was 17.0% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 3.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 years it has been between 14.0% and 18.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +2.9 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +2.6 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years Ceigall India Ltd's operations used more cash than they brought in, so cash conversion was −91%, a gap worth watching. In FY26 its operations used ₹91.0 Cr of cash, against ₹309 Cr of profit. After ₹45.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹136 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Why this happened. Receipts could reduce the need for new borrowing and allow scheduled equity deployment. Sale proceeds must not be confused with recurring operating cash or added again as an independent earnings contribution.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why −91% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 448 days shorter between FY21 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 1.5× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Ceigall India Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was −459 days in FY26, down from −11 days in FY21. It spent ₹267 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 58 days to pay, and stock sits for 37 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹4,022 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹11.0 Cr, so roughly −₹5,058 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 58 days to pay and stock sat for 37 days, about 1.2 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of −459 days, shorter than FY21's −11.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 37 days. Customers pay about 58 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 554 days. Together that makes the −459-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹267 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹173 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹4.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Ceigall India Ltd's P/E is 19.0×, in the middle of its own history: higher than 59% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 18.4×, over 2.2 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +6.0% while the price moved +55.5%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range.

In short: the multiple is about average against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source has, is not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 3.4% on reported income across 13 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Worked out from its price on 11 October 2026, Ceigall India Ltd's share price assumed profit growth of about 11.7% a year. Over the past 6 years its profit actually grew 23.1% a year. Today its P/E is 19.0×, higher than 59% of its own last 2.2 years.

This works the share price backwards. It asks one question: what yearly profit growth does the price already assume? The answer is the growth rate at which eleven years of profit (six years of growth, then five years of slowing) add up to that day's market value, after each year is discounted at 11%.

This is a one-day reading, taken on 11 October 2026. Every other number on this page, the multiple included, uses the latest price as of 5 November 2026. A higher price assumes more growth and a lower price less, so it changes whenever the price changes, and this page does not update it between measurements.

Ceigall India Ltd's business is turning around. Profit growth has swung from −33.3% at its low to +64.3%, rising from a low 5 quarters ago (from single-quarter figures), with ROCE falling at 17.0%. This is based on 10 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: a turn in growth is often where a bigger change starts. The lines say a turn is forming, so the question is whether the next quarters confirm it.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Ceigall India Ltd's story is not scored yet against the checks our research set on 10 October 2026. Where it sits in its own cycle: EARLY EXPANSION.

NOT YET CHECKED

Our read, 10 October 2026. Project starts are translating order visibility into earnings, but cash collection and HAM sale receipts determine whether the expansion can finance itself.

From the numbers. The normalization…

From the price. Price stage 2, week 37, above its 200-day line, relative strength rising.

From the research. Project starts are translating order visibility into earnings, but cash collection and HAM sale receipts determine whether the expansion can finance itself.

Where they disagree. The normalization verdict is NA SHORT MARGIN HISTORY.

What is proven. Project starts are translating order visibility into earnings, but cash collection and HAM sale receipts determine whether the expansion can finance itself.

What is not proven yet. The thesis breaks if newly started projects continue recording earnings while operating cash stays negative and HAM sale receipts fail to fund the promised equity deployment, forcing additional borrowing to sustain execution. Conversely, reconciled positive operating cash and verified disposal receipts covering scheduled equity deployment would remove the principal funding objection.

What would change our mind. The thesis breaks if newly started projects continue recording earnings while operating cash stays negative and HAM sale receipts fail to fund the promised equity deployment, forcing additional borrowing to sustain execution. Conversely, reconciled positive operating cash and verified disposal receipts covering scheduled equity deployment would remove the principal funding objection.

The test written in advance. Debt-funded earnings. Measured by: Debt-funded earnings Reported profit rises while operating cash remains negative and consolidated borrowing increases. by the next result.

The test written in advance. External prerequisites delay conversion. Measured by: External prerequisites delay conversion Guided execution fails to appear after prerequisite clearance, or additional projects remain unable to mobilise. by the next result.

The key numbers to watch, and the level that would change the picture

Everything further down this page is evidence for or against these.

What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: Higher revenue and profit suggest continued recovery. The research reads it further: Operating profit increased faster than revenue as margin improved; higher interest and tax limited net-profit conversion.

What the surface reading misses. The surface reading is: Profit growth exceeds revenue growth. The research reads it further: The operating-profit increase and higher operating margin explain the direction, while tax and financing absorb part of the benefit.

Sources: our stock research file (10 October 2026) · quarterly results through Sep 2026 · the company’s own earnings calls. The story check is re-scored every results season; the record below never changes.

The whole page in one table. Each row links to its section.

What Ceigall India Ltd's management promised, against what actually happened: 4 promises on the record. Read straight from the company’s own earnings calls. A promise that slipped stays on this page after it is met.

Order Inflow Guidance Raised Without Explanation · 10 August 2026. In May 2026, management guided for a minimum order inflow of INR5,500 crores for Financial Year '27. In the Aug 2026 call, management stated a INR6,000 crore goal, approximately 9% higher, without explaining the change in the annual guidance.

Billing and Payment Mechanics Changed Without Clarification · 10 August 2026. In May 2026, management said a government notification enabled monthly payments, supporting the expectation of improved cash flow and working capital. In Aug 2026, management attributed delayed payment on Northern Ayodhya to failure to achieve project milestones, stating that payment could only be made after milestone achievement, without clarifying whether this project is exempt from the monthly-payment mechanism.

Solar Equity Requirement Revision · 9 February 2026. Management previously indicated in the November 2025 call that total equity for the renewable energy and BESS sectors combined would be less than 600 crores. However, in the February 2026 call, the requirement was revised significantly upward to 810 crores for the solar projects alone, marking a substantial increase in committed capital for the new segment. Earlier call (Nov 2025): “Exact figures can be shared with you. It”. Later call (Feb 2026): “For the new projects, it is 395 crores and for solar, it is close to 810 crores.”

VRK 12 Project Delay · 9 February 2026. In the November 2025 call, management stated they expected to achieve the Appointed Date for the VRK 12 HAM project before December 31, 2025. In the February 2026 call, the timeline has slipped by several months, with management now guiding for an Appointed Date one or two months after the VRK 11 milestone, which itself is now planned for March 2026. Earlier call (Nov 2025): “VRK 12, we are expecting any time before 31st December 2025.” Later call (Feb 2026): “For VRK 11, we expect a final meeting regarding forest clearance tomorrow or the day after. before March 31. Regarding VRK 12, we should have that about a month or two after VRK 11.”

Every quote above is taken word for word from the company’s own earnings calls.

Ceigall India Ltd earned a ROCE of 17% in FY26. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a 7.7% net margin and 0.73× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 7.7% net margin × 0.73× asset turnover × 2.58× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 14.5% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The quarterly return lines and the return-on-capital-used (ROIC) line, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 3.4% on reported income across 13 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Ceigall India Ltd had ₹1,311 Cr of borrowings against ₹2,138 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 0.61× its equity. Its operating profit is 4 times its interest bill. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹30.0 Cr to ₹1,311 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹267 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

Why this happened. Monthly billing eligibility and commercial paper offer possible collection and interest-cost improvements. The latest milestone-payment explanation shows that eligibility is not equivalent to immediate collection. Commercial paper pricing is a goal rather than a delivered saving. Neither benefit is included as a quantified profit uplift.

Part of the spending on assets is being paid for with borrowed money.

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 3.4% on reported income across 13 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Domestic institutions cut their stake in Ceigall India Ltd by 1.6 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Domestic institutions now own 5.3% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +0.5 points over the same period, to 3.5%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Domestic institutions: −1.6 points over 8 quarters, to 5.3%; Foreign institutions: +0.5 points over 8 quarters, to 3.5%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters, to 82.0%.

Why the owners changed: domestic institutions drove it (−1.6 points), with the other side taken by foreign institutions (+0.5 points). They reduced their stake.

For Ceigall India Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

63.6 out of 100, rank 2 of 16 in Construction - Civil/Turnkey, with 75% of the evidence available.

Ceigall India Ltd scores 63.6 out of 100 against the 16 companies it is compared with in Construction - Civil/Turnkey, ranking 2. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 20.7 + 14.3 + 9.9 + 18.7 = 63.6. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Ceigall India ranks 2 of 16 Construction - Civil/Turnkey companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 63.6 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Construction - Civil/Turnkey, all 16 compared on one page.

Ceigall India is the 3rd largest of 16 Construction - Civil/Turnkey companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Interise Trust and Afcons Infrastructure. Just below it: GHV Infra Projects, Rajesh Power Services, B.L.Kashyap & Sons and SRM Contractors.

Construction - Civil/Turnkey companies close in size

1. Interise Trust ₹11,659 crore
2. Afcons Infrastructure Ltd ₹7,578 crore
3. Ceigall India Ltd ₹6,741 crore
4. GHV Infra Projects Ltd ₹2,027 crore
5. Rajesh Power Services Ltd ₹1,495 crore
6. B.L.Kashyap & Sons Ltd ₹1,175 crore
7. SRM Contractors Ltd ₹932 crore

All 16 Construction - Civil/Turnkey companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

728. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd ₹6,758 crore · Aerospace & Defence - Equipments
729. Transport Corporation of India Ltd ₹6,745 crore · Logistics
730. Ceigall India Ltd ₹6,741 crore
731. Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd ₹6,714 crore · Quick Service Restaurant - QSR
732. JK Paper Ltd ₹6,711 crore · Paper

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 5 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.