SAP SE
SAPSAP SE's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +130.2% in a year against a −30.9% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +130.2% against a −30.9% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.
The price is in a downtrend (25 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +8.3% year on year, and 146% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
SAP SE trades at $195, in a downtrend and 25 weeks into that stage. That is −3.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 33% of a 52-week range of $155 to $278. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 25 of stage 4. At $195 it trades −3.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 33% of its 52-week range ($155–$278).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +155% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 2 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
SAP SE trades at 25.0× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 25.0× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +130.2% against a −30.9% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +13.7%/yr price move, ~+16.4%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−2.7 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
SAP SE reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: profit growth has eased from +157.2% at its peak to +32.4% but is still expanding, ROCE holding at 19.0%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +7.7% | +7.6% | — | — |
| Profit | +132.7% | +33.7% | — | — |
| EPS | +130.2% | +46.5% | — | — |
| Stock price | −30.9% | +13.7% | +6.0% | +8.5% |
4-Factor Sector Score
52.9/100 — rank 10 of 30 in Software - Application · 58% evidence confidence
SAP SE scores 52.9 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Software - Application, ranking 10. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18.7 + 14.2 + 10.5 + 9.5 = 52.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
SAP SE reported $9.6 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +6.0% year on year. That is the 12th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 8.1% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $36.8 B. The last four reported quarters add to $37.3 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $36.8 B (+7.7% on the year), capping 4 years at 8.1% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $9.6 B, +6.0% year on year — the 12th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +6.3% growth against the decade's 8.1% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +6.2% over the last 4 quarters against +8.4%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +32.4% vs +79.7%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
SAP SE's operating margin is 28.7% in the Mar 26 quarter, +2.8 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 13.7% to 26.1%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 28.7%, +2.8 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 13.7%–26.1%, and FY25's 26.1% is the top of that band — a record year.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +2.8 pp year on year while gross margin went −0.4 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
SAP SE earned $1.9 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +8.3% year on year. It is the 4th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $7.3 B. The 4-year compound rate is 1.8%. That is 20.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $1.8 B.
Mar 26 profit was $1.9 B, +8.3% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed $7.3 B (+132.7%), and the 4-year compound rate is 1.8%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +6.0% and the margin +2.8 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +39.6% vs revenue +6.3%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 146% of SAP SE's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $9.2 B of operating cash against $7.3 B of profit. After $0.7 B of capital spending, $8.4 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $9.2 B against reported profit of $7.3 B, leaving free cash of $8.4 B after $0.7 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 146% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
SAP SE does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $2.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 1.8% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $2.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
SAP SE earns a ROE of 16% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 7% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +10.1 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 19.9% net margin on 0.52× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 16%, recovered from a FY24 trough of 7% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 19.9% net margin × 0.52× asset turns × 1.56× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 16.1% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 18.2% − 8.1% = a +10.1 pp spread. The 8.1% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
SAP SE has 3 quarters of declared dividends on file — too few for a trailing-twelve-month figure. The most recent declaration was $2.50 for Dec 25.
SAP SE has declared a dividend in 3 of the last 12 reported quarters, most recently $2.50 for Dec 25. That is fewer than four quarters, so no trailing-twelve-month total is shown rather than one built from a partial year.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
SAP SE carries total debt of $10.5 B against shareholder equity of $45.3 B as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.23 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.38 in FY21 to 0.18 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Jun 26: total debt of $10.5 B against shareholder equity of $45.3 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.23. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.38 (FY21) to 0.18 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
No ownership or positioning reading is held for SAP SE, so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 4.0 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
SAP SE: the Z-score reads 6.46. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 6.46 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 6.46.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Zoom Communications, Inc.ZM | 63.9/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.4/35 Revenue 5% · PAT 97.5% · OPM change 4.5 pp 95% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 25.1% 76% evidence | 16.1/20 P/E 14.3× · PEG 0.55 65% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector 15.8% · RS bench 5.3% · 1Y 42.7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 13.1 + 16.1 + 13.3 = 63.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Autodesk, Inc.ADSK | 62.7/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BASING | 29.4/35 Revenue 18.3% · PAT 44.6% · OPM change 13.7 pp 95% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 8.8% · OPM 28% 76% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 34.5× · PEG 0.74 65% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -8.5% · RS bench -19.5% · 1Y -18.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.4 + 15.9 + 12.9 + 4.5 = 62.7 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -8.5% and the one-year return is -18.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 3Automatic Data Processing, Inc.ADP | 60.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.7 pp 45% evidence | 16.8/25 ROCE 10% · OPM 30.1% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 20.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 10.8% · RS bench -2% · 1Y -11.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 16.8 + 10.1 + 17 = 60.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Paychex, Inc.PAYX | 59.9/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.9/35 Revenue 16.9% · PAT 6.3% · OPM change 7.5 pp 95% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 37.7% 76% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG 2.83 65% evidence | 16.5/20 RS sector 10% · RS bench -2.8% · 1Y -16%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 15.9 + 6.6 + 16.5 = 59.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Snowflake Inc.SNOW | 59.0/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 25.3/35 Revenue 31.1% · PAT — · OPM change 19.5 pp 71% evidence | 4.0/25 ROCE -6.6% · OPM -23.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 19.7/20 RS sector 49% · RS bench 32.7% · 1Y 65.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.3 + 4 + 10 + 19.7 = 59 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Workday, Inc.WDAY | 57.6/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.3/35 Revenue 13.3% · PAT 73.9% · OPM change 11.6 pp 95% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 13.3% 76% evidence | 7.7/20 P/E 38.3× · PEG 2.14 65% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector -0.1% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y -22.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.3 + 10.3 + 7.7 + 13.3 = 57.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Fair Isaac CorporationFICO | 57.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8.9 pp 45% evidence | 21.5/25 ROCE 30.4% · OPM 58.2% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 34.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -23.9% · RS bench -33.2% · 1Y -20.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.5 + 21.5 + 9.8 + 1.4 = 57.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.SSNC | 55.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 18.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.6 pp 45% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 24.2% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 17.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector 5% · RS bench -6.9% · 1Y -6.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.2 + 12.6 + 10.7 + 13.6 = 55.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Guidewire Software, Inc.GWRE | 53.1/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 27.3/35 Revenue 25% · PAT 100% · OPM change 6.7 pp 95% evidence | 7.1/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 8.2% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 74.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -5.9% · RS bench -18.7% · 1Y -24.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.3 + 7.1 + 8.9 + 9.8 = 53.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10SAP SEthis pageSAP | 52.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 18.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.8 pp 45% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 28.7% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.5/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -33.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.7 + 14.2 + 10.5 + 9.5 = 52.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Cadence Design Systems, Inc.CDNS | 52.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 45% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 29.3% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 74.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench -7.4% · 1Y -3.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 14.8 + 9 + 9.1 = 52.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Intuit Inc.INTU | 52.5/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BASING | 19.6/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 32.2% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 18.1/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 47% 76% evidence | 13.6/20 P/E 23.5× · PEG 0.69 65% evidence | 1.2/20 RS sector -32.9% · RS bench -42.6% · 1Y -56.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 18.1 + 13.6 + 1.2 = 52.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Salesforce, Inc.CRM | 52.2/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | TURNING | 19.1/35 Revenue 11% · PAT 29.3% · OPM change 1.3 pp 95% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 21.1% 76% evidence | 14.8/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG 0.58 65% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -8.2% · RS bench -19.4% · 1Y -20.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 11.9 + 14.8 + 6.4 = 52.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Roper Technologies, Inc.ROP | 51.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 27.2% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 14× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.5/20 RS sector -1.8% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y -26.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 12.2 + 11.2 + 11.5 = 51.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15Adobe Inc.ADBE | 50.8/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BASING | 15.9/35 Revenue 11.5% · PAT 5.2% · OPM change -2.1 pp 95% evidence | 17.7/25 ROCE 12.1% · OPM 33.8% 76% evidence | 12.1/20 P/E 14.8× · PEG 1.25 65% evidence | 5.1/20 RS sector -9.2% · RS bench -20.6% · 1Y -24.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 17.7 + 12.1 + 5.1 = 50.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16PTC Inc.PTC | 46.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.1 pp 45% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 38.2% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 11× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.4/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench -22.3% · 1Y -31%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 13.9 + 11.4 + 3.4 = 46.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Datadog, Inc.DDOG | 43.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | LEADER | 18.3/35 Revenue 29.5% · PAT -18% · OPM change 2.3 pp 83% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 0.7% 76% evidence | 3.6/20 P/E 302.7× · PEG 4.93 65% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 71.9% · RS bench 58.3% · 1Y 120.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 6.3 + 3.6 + 15.7 = 43.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Dynatrace, Inc.DT | 43.8/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.3/35 Revenue 18.9% · PAT -66.5% · OPM change -2.6 pp 83% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 7% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 68.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 7.8% · RS bench -4.3% · 1Y -1.1%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.3 + 9.3 + 9.2 + 13 = 43.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -4.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 19Shopify Inc.SHOP | 42.9/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | TURNING | 22.8/35 Revenue 31.9% · PAT 56% · OPM change 3.5 pp 62% evidence | 9.9/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 12.1% 76% evidence | 4.2/20 P/E 117.4× · PEG 4.21 65% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -7.5% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -17.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 9.9 + 4.2 + 6 = 42.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -7.5% and the one-year return is -17.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 20Uber Technologies, Inc.UBER | 42.9/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.7/35 Revenue 18.3% · PAT -29.8% · OPM change 4 pp 83% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 14.6% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 17.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench -20.6% · 1Y -19.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 11.3 + 10.6 + 3.3 = 42.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21ServiceNow, Inc.NOW | 42.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.3 pp 45% evidence | 9.9/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 13.3% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 62× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -9% · RS bench -21.7% · 1Y -32.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14 + 9.9 + 9.3 + 8.8 = 42 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Fiserv, Inc.FISV | 41.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BASING | 8.7/35 Revenue 1.9% · PAT -20.1% · OPM change -8.9 pp 83% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 18.3% 76% evidence | 15.6/20 P/E 9.5× · PEG 0.6 65% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -22.2% · RS bench -33.8% · 1Y -58.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.7 + 11.5 + 15.6 + 6 = 41.8 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 23Tyler Technologies, Inc.TYL | 40.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 16.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.5 pp 45% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 16.3% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 38.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -20.2% · RS bench -30.8% · 1Y -47.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 11.7 + 9.4 + 2.8 = 40.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Atlassian CorporationTEAM | 39.9/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.5/35 Revenue 24% · PAT — · OPM change -2.2 pp 62% evidence | 4.8/25 ROCE -2.2% · OPM -3.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector -2.9% · RS bench -17.2% · 1Y -34.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 4.8 + 10 + 11.6 = 39.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Grab Holdings LimitedGRAB | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.9/35 Revenue 21.8% · PAT — · OPM change 5 pp 62% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 2.3% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 366× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -15.7% · RS bench -26.4% · 1Y -23.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 5.7 + 8.5 + 3.2 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Unity Software Inc.U | 37.8/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 8.7/35 Revenue 7.5% · PAT — · OPM change -39.7 pp 62% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -6.5% · OPM -69.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 15.0/20 RS sector 10.4% · RS bench -4.2% · 1Y 5.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.7 + 4.1 + 10 + 15 = 37.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -4.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 27Figma, Inc.FIG | 31.9/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.3/35 Revenue 41.4% · PAT — · OPM change -58.6 pp 62% evidence | 3.9/25 ROCE -9.3% · OPM -41.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -16.3% · RS bench -30.2% · 1Y -65.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 3.9 + 10 + 4.7 = 31.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28Strategy IncMSTR | 26.0/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -6310.1 pp 45% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -14.3% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.2/20 RS sector -45% · RS bench -53.6% · 1Y -75.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.8 + 5.2 + 10.8 + 0.2 = 26 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Bending Spoons S.p.A.BSP | 51.0/100Thin evidence · provisional24% evidence | 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 13.5 pp 13% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 38.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 13.2 + 10 + 10 = 51 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Quantinuum Inc.QNT | 41.6/100Thin evidence · provisional20% evidence | 16.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1316.6 pp 13% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE -9% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 5.5 + 10 + 10 = 41.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is SAP SE's stock price today?
SAP SE trades at $195, −30.9% over the past year. The company is valued at $222 B. The stock sits at 33% of its 52-week range of $155–$278, −3.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 25 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were SAP SE's latest quarterly results?
SAP SE reported revenue of $9.6 B and net profit of $1.9 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 6.0% and profit rose 8.3% year on year. Earnings per share were $1.65. The operating margin was 28.7%, 2.8 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is SAP SE's revenue?
SAP SE reported revenue of $9.6 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +6.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $36.8 B (+7.7%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 8.1% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is SAP SE's profit?
SAP SE earned $1.9 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +8.3% year on year — the 4th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $7.3 B. The operating margin ran 28.7% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is SAP SE's market cap?
SAP SE's market capitalisation is $222 B at a stock price of $195. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does SAP SE pay a dividend?
Yes — SAP SE declared $2.50 per share for Dec 25 (3 quarters on file, too few for a trailing-twelve-month total). The latest quarter is up 6.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is SAP SE's dividend per share?
SAP SE's most recently declared dividend is $2.50 per share for Dec 25. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is SAP SE growing?
Yes — SAP SE is growing: latest-quarter revenue +6.0% year on year, profit +8.3%, and the margin +2.8 pp at 28.7%. The 4-year compound rates are 8.1% (revenue) and 1.8% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.
How is SAP SE performing?
SAP SE is in a downtrend, 25 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 6.0% and profit rose 8.3% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is SAP SE in?
Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: profit growth has eased from +157.2% at its peak to +32.4% but is still expanding, ROCE holding at 19.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +6.2% latest, profit growth +32.4% latest, eps growth +31.1% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is SAP SE in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 25 of stage 4), trading −3.3% versus its 200-day average and at 33% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is SAP SE beating the market?
On recent form, yes — SAP SE has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +155% against the S&P 500's +263% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will SAP SE's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for SAP SE. What it measures instead: the stock price is $195, the price is in a downtrend 25 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does SAP SE have too much debt?
No — SAP SE's debt-to-equity is 0.22. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 5 August 2026.
What is SAP SE's capex?
SAP SE spent $2.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.7 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is SAP SE's cash flow?
SAP SE generated $9.2 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $8.4 B of free cash flow after $0.7 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $7.3 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is SAP SE's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 146% of SAP SE's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $9.2 B against reported profit of $7.3 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is SAP SE?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 6.46 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is SAP SE in its business cycle?
SAP SE's FY25 operating margin was 26.1%, against a 5-year band of 13.7%–26.1%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 28.7%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the SAP SE story?
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +130.2% against a −30.9% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is SAP SE a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: SAP SE's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +130.2% in a year against a −30.9% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.