V-Guard Industries Ltd
VGUARDV-Guard Industries Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew −1.9% in a year against a −16.5% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: Foreign institutions moved −1.9 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.
The price is in a downtrend (45 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 3rd percentile of its own 8-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +75.7% year on year, and 151% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
V-Guard Industries Ltd trades at ₹315, in a downtrend and 45 weeks into that stage. That is −3.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 28% of a 52-week range of ₹291 to ₹374. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (16 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 45 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹315 it trades −3.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 28% of its 52-week range (₹291–₹374).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +430% while the NIFTY 500 moved +276% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (16 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-15) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
V-Guard Industries Ltd trades at 36.2× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 3% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 53.6×, measured across 8.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 36.2× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 3% of the time, against a long-run median of 53.6× measured over 8.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −1.9% against a −16.5% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +4.8%/yr price move, ~+11.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−6.2 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
V-Guard Industries Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at 17.0% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +7.0% | +13.1% | +17.0% | — |
| Profit | −1.9% | +17.7% | +8.8% | — |
| EPS | −1.9% | +17.2% | +8.6% | — |
| Share price | −16.5% | +3.2% | +4.8% | +10.7% |
4-Factor Sector Score
48.1/100 — rank 12 of 19 in Capital Goods - Electric General · 100% evidence confidence
V-Guard Industries Ltd scores 48.1 out of 100 against the 19 companies it is compared with in Capital Goods - Electric General, ranking 12. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 19 + 15 + 9.6 + 4.5 = 48.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
V-Guard Industries Ltd reported ₹1,811 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +23.5% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 9 years it has compounded at 12.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹5,966 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹6,311 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹5,966 Cr (+7.0% on the year), capping 9 years at 12.4% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹1,811 Cr, +23.5% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +12.9% growth against the decade's 12.4% — the current year is running in line with its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +13.4% over the last 4 quarters against +11.0%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +26.4% vs +11.7%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
V-Guard Industries Ltd's operating margin is 11.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +3.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 10 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 8.0% to 11.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 11.0%, +3.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 10 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 8.0%–11.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +2.1 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
V-Guard Industries Ltd earned ₹130 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +75.7% year on year. It is the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹308 Cr. The 9-year compound rate is 8.7%. That is 7.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹74.0 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹130 Cr, +75.7% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹308 Cr (−1.9%), and the 9-year compound rate is 8.7%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +23.5% and the margin +3.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +24.3% vs revenue +12.9%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 151% of V-Guard Industries Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹459 Cr of operating cash against ₹308 Cr of profit. After ₹230 Cr of capital spending, ₹229 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹459 Cr against reported profit of ₹308 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹229 Cr after ₹230 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 151% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 151%: the cash cycle tightened 23 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 2.0× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
V-Guard Industries Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 60 days in FY26, down from 83 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹556 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹5,966 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹16.3 Cr, so roughly ₹981 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 33 days, inventory at 98 days — roughly 3.2 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 60 days, tighter than FY21's 83.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 98 days to sell; customers pay about 33 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 71 days — netting out to the 60-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹5,966 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹16.3 Cr — so the 60-day loop keeps roughly ₹981 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹556 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹285 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹21.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
V-Guard Industries Ltd earns a ROCE of 18% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 15% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +4.0 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 5.2% net margin on 1.61× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 18%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 15% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 5.2% net margin × 1.61× asset turns × 1.56× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 13.1% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 16.0% − 12.0% = a +4.0 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
V-Guard Industries Ltd carries total debt of ₹165 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹2,373 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.07 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.05 in FY22 to 0.07 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹165 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹2,373 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.07. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.05 (FY22) to 0.07 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions added 3.1 points of V-Guard Industries Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 23.2% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −1.9 points over the same window, to 12.0%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: +3.1 points over 8 quarters to 23.2%; Foreign institutions: −1.9 points over 8 quarters to 12.0%; Promoters: −1.2 points over 8 quarters to 53.2%.
Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −1.9 points against domestic institutions +3.1 points over 8 quarters, with promoters −1.2 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
V-Guard Industries Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Modison LtdMODISONLTD | 79.1/100Favorable setup83% evidence | LEADER | 29.2/35 Revenue 45.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13 pp 83% evidence | 18.5/25 ROCE 31% · OPM 25% 95% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 18.5/20 RS sector 32.5% · RS bench 47.4% · 1Y 49.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.2 + 18.5 + 12.9 + 18.5 = 79.1 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Rishabh Instruments LtdRISHABH | 68.6/100Favorable setup86% evidence | LEADER | 25.7/35 Revenue 7.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 7 pp 88% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 14.5% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 29× · PEG — 50% evidence | 15.4/20 RS sector 19.1% · RS bench 34.3% · 1Y 114.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.7 + 16.4 + 11.1 + 15.4 = 68.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 3Modern Insulators LtdMODINSULAT | 66.8/100Favorable setup78% evidence | LEADER | 28.0/35 Revenue 42.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 19.4% · OPM 16% 76% evidence | 7.0/20 P/E 28× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 62.8% · RS bench 81.2% · 1Y 404.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28 + 17.8 + 7 + 14 = 66.8 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 4Ravindra Energy LtdRELTD | 65.9/100Favorable setup83% evidence | TURNING | 28.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8 pp 88% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 15.9% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 8.2/20 P/E 41.4× · PEG 1.97 65% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 6.9% · RS bench 12% · 1Y 19.3%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28.3 + 15.7 + 8.2 + 13.7 = 65.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Spectrum Electrical Industries LtdSPECTRUM | 64.7/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.4/35 Revenue 52% · PAT 92.3% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 16.8% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 4.3/20 P/E 83.6× · PEG 9.09 100% evidence | 19.5/20 RS sector 43% · RS bench 61.5% · 1Y 51%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.4 + 17.5 + 4.3 + 19.5 = 64.7 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 6Kirloskar Electric Company LtdKECL | 58.2/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence | TURNING | 21.3/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.4 pp 62% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 3.9% 95% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 105× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 10.9% · RS bench 25.3% · 1Y 4.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.3 + 12.5 + 8.7 + 15.7 = 58.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Insolation Energy LtdINA | 57.9/100Mixed-positive evidence90% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.4/35 Revenue 62.7% · PAT 61% · OPM change 0 pp 88% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 22.2% · OPM 14% 100% evidence | 19.6/20 P/E 12.3× · PEG 0.23 100% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -39.8% · RS bench -22.8% · 1Y -52.1%7 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 16.9 + 19.6 + 3 = 57.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Alpex Solar LtdALPEXSOLAR | 53.7/100Mixed-positive evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -3 pp 83% evidence | 18.3/25 ROCE 43.5% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 10.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -2.9% · RS bench -17.7% · 1Y -33.8%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 18.3 + 11.5 + 6.6 = 53.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9IKIO Technologies LtdIKIO | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.1/35 Revenue 22.4% · PAT 31.3% · OPM change 10 pp 62% evidence | 9.7/25 ROCE 9.5% · OPM 16% 95% evidence | 8.4/20 P/E 37.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.4/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench 12.1% · 1Y -3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 9.7 + 8.4 + 13.4 = 53.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Siemens LtdSIEMENS | 48.6/100Mixed-negative evidence78% evidence | FADING | 15.9/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT -40.3% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence | 17.3/25 ROCE 21.4% · OPM 10% 76% evidence | 7.3/20 P/E 47.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.1/20 RS sector -1.8% · RS bench 11.6% · 1Y 23.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 17.3 + 7.3 + 8.1 = 48.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Swelect Energy Systems LtdSWELECTES | 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.8/35 Revenue 5.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 19× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -4.4% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y -11.8%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.8 + 9.1 + 11 + 6.3 = 48.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12V-Guard Industries Ltdthis pageVGUARD | 48.1/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BASING | 19.0/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT 26.4% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 18.4% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 36.2× · PEG 2.51 100% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench -6.9% · 1Y -21.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 15 + 9.6 + 4.5 = 48.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Exicom Tele-Systems LtdEXICOM | 43.2/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.4/35 Revenue 32.7% · PAT -80% · OPM change 6.1 pp 65% evidence | 0.3/25 ROCE -14.7% · OPM 0.1% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.5/20 RS sector 9.4% · RS bench 22.7% · 1Y -3.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 0.3 + 10 + 16.5 = 43.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 22.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 14HPL Electric & Power LtdHPL | 39.4/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.0/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT -3.2% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 13.5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 22.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -22.8% · RS bench -15.3% · 1Y -40.2%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11 + 14.1 + 10.4 + 3.9 = 39.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Servotech Renewable Power System LtdSERVOTECH | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.6/35 Revenue 7.4% · PAT 7.5% · OPM change 1.9 pp 95% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM 9.5% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 51.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -21.6% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y -37.9%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.6 + 11.4 + 11.5 + 2.8 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Honda India Power Products LtdHONDAPOWER | 38.0/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.2/35 Revenue 11.8% · PAT -9.6% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 7.6/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 8% 95% evidence | 7.6/20 P/E 29× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -4% · RS bench -12.6% · 1Y -26.5%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 7.6 + 7.6 + 6.6 = 38 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Salzer Electronics LtdSALZERELEC | 37.5/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.2/35 Revenue 24% · PAT -22.1% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence | 8.7/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 7% 95% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 19.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -19.7% · RS bench -16.5% · 1Y -28.6%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.2 + 8.7 + 9.9 + 4.7 = 37.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Focus Lighting & Fixtures LtdFOCUS | 31.6/100Adverse evidence61% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.0/35 Revenue 2.4% · PAT -66.6% · OPM change 0.9 pp 83% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 10.2% 95% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 93.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench -13.2% · 1Y —0 of 3 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7 + 7.5 + 8.9 + 8.2 = 31.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Igarashi Motors India LtdIGARASHI | 30.9/100Adverse evidence70% evidence | TURNING | 7.8/35 Revenue 3.3% · PAT -49.8% · OPM change -1.9 pp 83% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE 4.6% · OPM 8.5% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 117× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -19.7% · RS bench 3.6% · 1Y -25.3%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.8 + 7.4 + 8.5 + 7.2 = 30.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is V-Guard Industries Ltd's share price today?
V-Guard Industries Ltd trades at ₹315, −16.5% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹13,741 Cr. The stock sits at 28% of its 52-week range of ₹291–₹374, −3.4% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 45 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were V-Guard Industries Ltd's latest quarterly results?
V-Guard Industries Ltd reported revenue of ₹1,811 Cr and net profit of ₹130 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 23.5% and profit rose 75.7% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹2.98. The operating margin was 11.0%, 3.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is V-Guard Industries Ltd's revenue?
V-Guard Industries Ltd reported revenue of ₹1,811 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +23.5% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹5,966 Cr (+7.0%). Over the last 9 years revenue compounded at 12.4% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is V-Guard Industries Ltd's profit?
V-Guard Industries Ltd earned ₹130 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +75.7% year on year — the 2nd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹308 Cr. The operating margin ran 11.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is V-Guard Industries Ltd's market cap?
V-Guard Industries Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹13,741 Cr at a share price of ₹315. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is V-Guard Industries Ltd's P/E ratio?
V-Guard Industries Ltd trades at a P/E of 36.2×, at the 3rd percentile of its own 8-year range, against a long-run median of 53.6×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does V-Guard Industries Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — V-Guard Industries Ltd's dividend payout was 21% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in each of its last 10 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is V-Guard Industries Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, V-Guard Industries Ltd looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 36.2× has been cheaper only 3% of the time in 8 years (long-run median 53.6×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is V-Guard Industries Ltd growing?
Yes — V-Guard Industries Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +23.5% year on year, profit +75.7%, and the margin +3.0 pp at 11.0%. The 9-year compound rates are 12.4% (revenue) and 8.7% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.
How is V-Guard Industries Ltd performing?
V-Guard Industries Ltd is in a downtrend, 45 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 23.5% and profit rose 75.7% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 16 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
What stage is V-Guard Industries Ltd in?
Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at 17.0% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +13.4% latest, profit growth +26.4% latest, eps growth +26.3% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.
Is V-Guard Industries Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 45 of stage 4), trading −3.4% versus its 200-day average and at 28% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is V-Guard Industries Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view V-Guard Industries Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (16 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-15), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +430% against the NIFTY 500's +276% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will V-Guard Industries Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for V-Guard Industries Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹315, the price is in a downtrend 45 weeks in. Its P/E of 36.2× sits at the 3rd percentile of its own 8-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns V-Guard Industries Ltd?
Promoters hold 53.2% of V-Guard Industries Ltd, foreign institutions 12.0%, domestic institutions 23.2% and the public 11.5% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions added 3.1 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does V-Guard Industries Ltd have too much debt?
No — V-Guard Industries Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.07, and operating profit covers the interest bill 44×. FY26 borrowings were ₹165 Cr against equity of ₹2,373 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.
What is V-Guard Industries Ltd's capex?
V-Guard Industries Ltd spent ₹556 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹230 Cr, with ₹21.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is V-Guard Industries Ltd's cash flow?
V-Guard Industries Ltd generated ₹459 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹229 Cr of free cash flow after ₹230 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹308 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is V-Guard Industries Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 151% of V-Guard Industries Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹459 Cr against reported profit of ₹308 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is V-Guard Industries Ltd in its business cycle?
V-Guard Industries Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 9.0%, against a 10-year band of 8.0%–11.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 11.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the V-Guard Industries Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: Foreign institutions moved −1.9 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is V-Guard Industries Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: V-Guard Industries Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew −1.9% in a year against a −16.5% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.