Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd
KECLKirloskar Electric Company Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +125.0% in a year against a +11.8% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +125.0% against a +11.8% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (11 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 87th percentile of its own 7-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 377% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd trades at ₹138, in a confirmed uptrend and 11 weeks into that stage. That is +21.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 98% of a 52-week range of ₹77 to ₹139. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 11 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹138 it trades +21.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 98% of its 52-week range (₹77–₹139).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +477% while the NIFTY 500 moved +282% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 2 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd trades at 105.0× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (87th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 32.8×, measured across 6.7 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 105.0× is at the pricey end of its own range (87th percentile), against a long-run median of 32.8× measured over 6.7 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +125.0% against a +11.8% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +5.2%/yr price move, ~−29.1%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+34.3 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — profit growth swung from −73.4% at the trough to +270.9%, a 3-quarter improving streak, ROCE holding at 15.0%. The read is built from 8 quarters across 4 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +8.3% | +7.5% | +16.2% | +0.7% |
| Profit | +100.0% | −36.3% | — | — |
| EPS | +125.0% | −35.4% | — | — |
| Share price | +11.8% | +5.2% | +48.7% | +10.6% |
4-Factor Sector Score
58.2/100 — rank 6 of 19 in Capital Goods - Electric General · 68% evidence confidence
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd scores 58.2 out of 100 against the 19 companies it is compared with in Capital Goods - Electric General, ranking 6. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 21.3 + 12.5 + 8.7 + 15.7 = 58.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd reported ₹164 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +26.7% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 0.7% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹589 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹589 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹589 Cr (+8.3% on the year), capping 10 years at 0.7% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹164 Cr, +26.7% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +10.0% growth against the decade's 0.7% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +8.4% over the last 4 quarters against +2.8%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +270.9% vs −0.7%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's operating margin is 3.9% in the Mar 26 quarter, +3.4 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −15.0% to 8.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 3.9%, +3.4 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −15.0%–8.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +3.4 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.5 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd posted a net loss of ₹0.6 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹8.0 Cr. That loss is 0.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹3.9 Cr. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was ₹−0.6 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹8.0 Cr (+100.0%).
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +212.4% vs revenue +10.0%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 377% of Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹25.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹8.0 Cr of profit. After ₹−5.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹30.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹25.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹8.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹30.0 Cr after ₹−5.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 377% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 377%: the cash cycle stretched 51 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −63 days in FY26, up from −114 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹11.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹589 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.6 Cr, so roughly ₹−102 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 52 days, inventory at 49 days — roughly 1.6 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −63 days, looser than FY21's −114.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 49 days to sell; customers pay about 52 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 164 days — netting out to the −63-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹589 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.6 Cr — so the −63-day loop keeps roughly ₹−102 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹11.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹14.0 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd earns a ROCE of 15% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −27% in FY15. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +8.1 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 1.4% net margin on 0.93× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 15%, recovered from a FY15 trough of −27% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 1.4% net margin × 0.93× asset turns × 4.84× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 6.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 20.1% − 12.0% = a +8.1 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd carries total debt of ₹100 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹132 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.76. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.87 in FY22 to 0.76 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹100 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹132 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.76. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.87 (FY22) to 0.76 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Promoters moved +0.2 points over the same window, to 49.7%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −0.4 points over 8 quarters to 1.3%; Promoters: +0.2 points over 8 quarters to 49.7%; Foreign institutions: −0.1 points over 8 quarters to 4.1%.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Modison LtdMODISONLTD | 79.1/100Favorable setup83% evidence | LEADER | 29.2/35 Revenue 45.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13 pp 83% evidence | 18.5/25 ROCE 31% · OPM 25% 95% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 18.5/20 RS sector 32.5% · RS bench 47.4% · 1Y 49.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29.2 + 18.5 + 12.9 + 18.5 = 79.1 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Rishabh Instruments LtdRISHABH | 68.6/100Favorable setup86% evidence | LEADER | 25.7/35 Revenue 7.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 7 pp 88% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 14.5% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 29× · PEG — 50% evidence | 15.4/20 RS sector 19.1% · RS bench 34.3% · 1Y 114.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.7 + 16.4 + 11.1 + 15.4 = 68.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 3Modern Insulators LtdMODINSULAT | 66.8/100Favorable setup78% evidence | LEADER | 28.0/35 Revenue 42.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 19.4% · OPM 16% 76% evidence | 7.0/20 P/E 28× · PEG — 50% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 62.8% · RS bench 81.2% · 1Y 404.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28 + 17.8 + 7 + 14 = 66.8 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 4Ravindra Energy LtdRELTD | 65.9/100Favorable setup83% evidence | TURNING | 28.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8 pp 88% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 15.9% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 8.2/20 P/E 41.4× · PEG 1.97 65% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 6.9% · RS bench 12% · 1Y 19.3%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28.3 + 15.7 + 8.2 + 13.7 = 65.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Spectrum Electrical Industries LtdSPECTRUM | 64.7/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.4/35 Revenue 52% · PAT 92.3% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 16.8% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 4.3/20 P/E 83.6× · PEG 9.09 100% evidence | 19.5/20 RS sector 43% · RS bench 61.5% · 1Y 51%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.4 + 17.5 + 4.3 + 19.5 = 64.7 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 6Kirloskar Electric Company Ltdthis pageKECL | 58.2/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence | TURNING | 21.3/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.4 pp 62% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 3.9% 95% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 105× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 10.9% · RS bench 25.3% · 1Y 4.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.3 + 12.5 + 8.7 + 15.7 = 58.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Insolation Energy LtdINA | 57.9/100Mixed-positive evidence90% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.4/35 Revenue 62.7% · PAT 61% · OPM change 0 pp 88% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 22.2% · OPM 14% 100% evidence | 19.6/20 P/E 12.3× · PEG 0.23 100% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -39.8% · RS bench -22.8% · 1Y -52.1%7 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 16.9 + 19.6 + 3 = 57.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Alpex Solar LtdALPEXSOLAR | 53.7/100Mixed-positive evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -3 pp 83% evidence | 18.3/25 ROCE 43.5% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 10.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -2.9% · RS bench -17.7% · 1Y -33.8%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 18.3 + 11.5 + 6.6 = 53.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9IKIO Technologies LtdIKIO | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.1/35 Revenue 22.4% · PAT 31.3% · OPM change 10 pp 62% evidence | 9.7/25 ROCE 9.5% · OPM 16% 95% evidence | 8.4/20 P/E 37.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.4/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench 12.1% · 1Y -3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 9.7 + 8.4 + 13.4 = 53.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Siemens LtdSIEMENS | 48.6/100Mixed-negative evidence78% evidence | FADING | 15.9/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT -40.3% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence | 17.3/25 ROCE 21.4% · OPM 10% 76% evidence | 7.3/20 P/E 47.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.1/20 RS sector -1.8% · RS bench 11.6% · 1Y 23.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 17.3 + 7.3 + 8.1 = 48.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Swelect Energy Systems LtdSWELECTES | 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.8/35 Revenue 5.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 19× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -4.4% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y -11.8%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.8 + 9.1 + 11 + 6.3 = 48.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12V-Guard Industries LtdVGUARD | 48.1/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BASING | 19.0/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT 26.4% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 18.4% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 36.2× · PEG 2.51 100% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench -6.9% · 1Y -21.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 15 + 9.6 + 4.5 = 48.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Exicom Tele-Systems LtdEXICOM | 43.2/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.4/35 Revenue 32.7% · PAT -80% · OPM change 6.1 pp 65% evidence | 0.3/25 ROCE -14.7% · OPM 0.1% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.5/20 RS sector 9.4% · RS bench 22.7% · 1Y -3.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 0.3 + 10 + 16.5 = 43.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 22.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 14HPL Electric & Power LtdHPL | 39.4/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.0/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT -3.2% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 13.5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 22.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -22.8% · RS bench -15.3% · 1Y -40.2%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11 + 14.1 + 10.4 + 3.9 = 39.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Servotech Renewable Power System LtdSERVOTECH | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.6/35 Revenue 7.4% · PAT 7.5% · OPM change 1.9 pp 95% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM 9.5% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 51.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -21.6% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y -37.9%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.6 + 11.4 + 11.5 + 2.8 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Honda India Power Products LtdHONDAPOWER | 38.0/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.2/35 Revenue 11.8% · PAT -9.6% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 7.6/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 8% 95% evidence | 7.6/20 P/E 29× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -4% · RS bench -12.6% · 1Y -26.5%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 7.6 + 7.6 + 6.6 = 38 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Salzer Electronics LtdSALZERELEC | 37.5/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.2/35 Revenue 24% · PAT -22.1% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence | 8.7/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 7% 95% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 19.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -19.7% · RS bench -16.5% · 1Y -28.6%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.2 + 8.7 + 9.9 + 4.7 = 37.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Focus Lighting & Fixtures LtdFOCUS | 31.6/100Adverse evidence61% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.0/35 Revenue 2.4% · PAT -66.6% · OPM change 0.9 pp 83% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 10.2% 95% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 93.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench -13.2% · 1Y —0 of 3 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7 + 7.5 + 8.9 + 8.2 = 31.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Igarashi Motors India LtdIGARASHI | 30.9/100Adverse evidence70% evidence | TURNING | 7.8/35 Revenue 3.3% · PAT -49.8% · OPM change -1.9 pp 83% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE 4.6% · OPM 8.5% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 117× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -19.7% · RS bench 3.6% · 1Y -25.3%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.8 + 7.4 + 8.5 + 7.2 = 30.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's share price today?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd trades at ₹138, +11.8% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹915 Cr. The stock sits at 98% of its 52-week range of ₹77–₹139, +21.4% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 11 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd reported revenue of ₹164 Cr and a net loss of ₹0.6 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−0.09. The operating margin was 3.9%, 3.4 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's revenue?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd reported revenue of ₹164 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +26.7% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹589 Cr (+8.3%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 0.7% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's profit?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd earned ₹−0.6 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹8.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 3.9% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's market cap?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹915 Cr at a share price of ₹138. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's P/E ratio?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd trades at a P/E of 105.0×, at the 87th percentile of its own 7-year range, against a long-run median of 32.8×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 105.0× sits at the 87th percentile of its 7-year range (long-run median 32.8×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
How is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd performing?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 11 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
What stage is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd in?
Turning around — profit growth swung from −73.4% at the trough to +270.9%, a 3-quarter improving streak, ROCE holding at 15.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +8.4% latest, profit growth +270.9% latest, eps growth +266.7% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 11 of stage 2), trading +21.4% versus its 200-day average and at 98% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +477% against the NIFTY 500's +282% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹138, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 11 weeks in. Its P/E of 105.0× sits at the 87th percentile of its own 7-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd?
Promoters hold 49.7% of Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd, foreign institutions 4.1%, domestic institutions 1.3% and the public 44.9% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.76, and operating profit covers the interest bill 1×. FY26 borrowings were ₹100 Cr against equity of ₹131 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's capex?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd spent ₹11.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹−5.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's cash flow?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd generated ₹25.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹30.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹−5.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹8.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 377% of Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹25.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹8.0 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd in its business cycle?
Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 6.0%, against a 13-year band of −15.0%–8.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 3.9%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +125.0% against a +11.8% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +125.0% in a year against a +11.8% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.