Satia Industries share price today

Satia Industries Ltd's share price was ₹66.25 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been moving sideways for 4 weeks. That is 2.1% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹54 and ₹75, and at that close it sat 60% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Satia Industries Ltd is in stage 1. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 16 weeks in a row.

Over the last 11 years the share price moved +2,372% while the NIFTY 500 moved +241%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

One change stood out: operating margin down 3 points on a year earlier.

1. Operating margin down 3 points on a year earlier

   14% in the June 2026 quarter, from 17%.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), Satia Industries reported revenue of ₹362 crore, down 2.4% from ₹371 crore a year earlier, and a loss of ₹17.0 crore, down 153.1% from ₹32.0 crore.

Satia Industries results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Satia Industries closed at ₹66.25 on 4 November 2026, down 11.2% from ₹74.62 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and down 28.6% over five years. Its highest weekly close since March 2016 was ₹152.75 on 28 October 2022.

Satia Industries share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices, adjusted for splits and bonuses so every price is on today’s share count. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

500 weekly closes from 15 March 2016 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: Satia Industries closed at ₹66.25, up 3.7% on the week and down 3.2% on the month. 23 Sep 2026: ex-date for a dividend of ₹0.40 a share.

Earlier

• Results for April to June 2026: Revenue down 2.4% and profit down 153.1% on a year earlier.

Satia Industries paid ₹0.40 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 5 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 0.60% at the ₹66.25 close on 4 November 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹0.40 a share, ex-date 23 September 2026.

Satia Industries dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date.

Not in its latest year. Satia Industries Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in FY26. It did pay a dividend in 10 of its last 13 reported years, so there is a history but no current dividend.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

Satia Industries is on 2 of our India lists: Momentum stocks and Penny stocks.

Satia Industries Ltd posted a net loss of ₹17.0 Cr in the Jun 2026 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹41.0 Cr. Over 10 years profit has grown 12.2% a year on average. That loss is 4.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹32.0 Cr. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

Jun 2026 profit was −₹17.0 Cr, −153.1% on a year earlier. For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹41.0 Cr (−65.5% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed −2.4% on a year earlier and the margin moved −3.0 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −126.1% and revenue −2.9%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Satia Industries Ltd reported ₹362 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, −2.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 10 years it has grown 12.9% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,452 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,443 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY26 revenue was ₹1,452 Cr, −4.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew −2.9% on average, against 12.9% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew −2.8%, against −6.2% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating).

Satia Industries Ltd's operating margin was 14.0% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 3.0 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 years it has been between 9.0% and 24.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −3.0 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −3.4 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 237% of Satia Industries Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹233 Cr of operating cash against ₹41.0 Cr of profit.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

After ₹236 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹3.0 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 237% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 37 days shorter between FY21 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner.

What to look at next: no single use of cash stands out. The next section checks both the cash tied up in daily operations and the spending on assets.

Satia Industries Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 86 days in FY26, down from 123 days in FY21. It spent ₹552 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 32 days to pay, and stock sits for 85 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹1,452 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹4.0 Cr, so roughly ₹342 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 32 days to pay and stock sat for 85 days, about 2.8 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 86 days, shorter than FY21's 123.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 85 days. Customers pay about 32 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 31 days. Together that makes the 86-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹552 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹447 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building a little beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹257 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: neither the daily cycle nor new spending is soaking up the cash, so the picture is fairly clean.

Satia Industries Ltd's P/E is 15.6×, near the high end of its own history: higher than 92% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 7.6×, over 10 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −65.5% while the price moved −11.2%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 5 years the price moved −6.5% a year; about −3.8% a year came from earnings growth and about −2.7 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less); over 10 years the price moved +35.8% a year; about +7.9% a year came from earnings growth and about +27.9 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying more). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is high against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Satia Industries Ltd's business is getting worse. Revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking: revenue growth is −2.8% in the latest quarter, against +33.8% at its best in 12 quarters, with ROCE falling at 4.0%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.