Banks - PSU: State Bank of India owns the largest revenue base; Bank of Maharashtra has the fastest current growth.
01 · the index people search for
Nifty Banks - PSU Index — Constituents & Performance
The Banks - PSU companies below are the listed Indian Banks - PSU universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Banks - PSU index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
02 · the sector itself · before any single company
How has Banks - PSU moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 15% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 14% on average over the last four reported quarters.
FADING · −3 in 4w✓Fundamentals up, price down1 of 13 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
Banks - PSU, equal-weighted, based at 200NIFTY 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Banks - PSU, equal-weighted, based at 200NIFTY 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Banks - PSU, equal-weighted, based at 200NIFTY 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 13 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
03 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Banks - PSU outperforming NIFTY 500?
Banks - PSU has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 3.7%. 3 of 13 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Bank of Maharashtra is the strongest against the sector itself at +20.6%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
-3.7%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
+7.0%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
3/13Stocks leading NIFTY 500
7/13Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: 7.8 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Banks - PSU has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 7% over 52 weeks and 3.7% over 13 weeks. 3 of 13 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 13 beat the sector itself. State Bank of India leads with income of ₹5,15,235 crore, based on 13 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Companies
13
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹19.2 L Cr
State Bank of India
Revenue growing
12/13
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
3/13
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 13
04 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Bank of Maharashtra has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 100% evidence confidence.
Union Bank of India looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Union Bank of India has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. Financial companies use P/BV÷ROE and asset quality; PEG, industrial OPM and ROCE are excluded. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Exact sum: 31.5 + 17 + 12.7 + 5.1 = 66.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -11.8% and the one-year return is -11.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Exact sum: 11.6 + 17.4 + 13.5 + 18.1 = 60.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 4.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
Exact sum: 20.8 + 17.4 + 10.1 + 10.6 = 58.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Exact sum: 21.9 + 10.2 + 15.1 + 9.1 = 56.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Exact sum: 20.1 + 12.1 + 14.3 + 8.4 = 54.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Exact sum: 13.2 + 13.9 + 10.2 + 12.2 = 49.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Exact sum: 24.4 + 8.5 + 10.1 + 5.5 = 48.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -11.7% and the one-year return is -22.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Exact sum: 17.7 + 7.2 + 11.7 + 9 = 45.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Exact sum: 10.6 + 17.3 + 12.3 + 3.8 = 44 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Exact sum: 9.7 + 6.2 + 17.7 + 4.5 = 38.1 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
Showing 10 of 13 companies
05 · what price has already done
Market action
Bank of Maharashtra has the strongest one-year price move in Banks - PSU at +39.9%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +16.2%. 3 of 13 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-31.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Banks - PSU itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
06 · compare level, then change
Income Scale & Growth Durability
State Bank of India has the highest Income among the 13 Banks - PSU companies compared here, at ₹5,15,235 crore. Bank of Baroda is next at ₹1,36,547 crore. Bank of Maharashtra has the highest Income growth at 15.8%, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: State Bank of India is the scale leader at ₹5,15,235 crore, 277.3% ahead of Bank of Baroda. Bank of Maharashtra's growth is 15.8% from a ₹30,262 crore base, with 20 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderState Bank of India · ₹5,15,235 crore
Gap277.3% versus #2 · Bank of Baroda
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/13 companies · 253 observations
Investor read: State Bank of India is the scale benchmark; Bank of Maharashtra is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: State Bank of India's growth falls below Bank of Maharashtra's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
For lenders, reported income is used instead of industrial-company sales. Growth is compared year-on-year.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
State Bank of India has the highest Net profit among the 13 Banks - PSU companies compared here, at ₹86,666 crore. Punjab National Bank is next at ₹22,135 crore. Indian Overseas Bank has the highest Profit growth at 51.8%, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: State Bank of India leads with ₹86,666 crore of TTM profit, 291.5% above Punjab National Bank. Indian Overseas Bank shows 51.8% growth from a ₹5,958 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderState Bank of India · ₹86,666 crore
Gap291.5% versus #2 · Punjab National Bank
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/13 companies · 253 observations
Investor read: State Bank of India sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is ranked only where the comparison base is economically meaningful. Loss-to-profit flips are shown but do not win the growth table.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Punjab National Bank has the highest Deposits among the 13 Banks - PSU companies compared here, at ₹17,38,908 crore. Bank of Baroda is next at ₹16,61,941 crore. State Bank of India has the highest Borrowings at ₹7,77,302 crore, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Punjab National Bank leads deposits at ₹17,38,908 crore; State Bank of India leads borrowings at ₹7,77,302 crore.
LeaderPunjab National Bank · ₹17,38,908 crore
Gap4.6% versus #2 · Bank of Baroda
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/13 companies · 224 observations
Investor read: Punjab National Bank sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current borrowings signal.
For banks, debt is operating funding rather than industrial leverage. Deposits and borrowings are therefore shown as funding-base levels; asset quality, funding cost and liquidity determine whether that funding is attractive.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Bank of Maharashtra has the highest ROA among the 13 Banks - PSU companies compared here, at 2%. IDBI Bank Ltd is next at 1.8%. Indian Overseas Bank has the highest ROA change at +0.3 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Bank of Maharashtra leads roa at 2%; Indian Overseas Bank leads roa change at +0.3 percentage points.
LeaderBank of Maharashtra · 2%
Gap11.1% versus #2 · IDBI Bank Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/13 companies · 220 observations
Investor read: Bank of Maharashtra sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roa change signal.
ROA is the cleanest first comparison for lenders because the balance sheet is the operating asset.
Withheld from this chart: State Bank of India (SBIN) — its two data sources disagree by up to 40% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Bank of Maharashtra has the highest ROE among the 13 Banks - PSU companies compared here, at 22.6%. Canara Bank is next at 16.1%. The same company also holds the highest ROE change, at +3.3 percentage points. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Bank of Maharashtra leads both roe at 22.6% and roe change at +3.3 percentage points.
LeaderBank of Maharashtra · 22.6%
Gap40.4% versus #2 · Canara Bank
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/13 companies · 228 observations
Investor read: Bank of Maharashtra sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roe change signal.
ROE shows the return to shareholders, but should be read with asset quality and leverage.
Withheld from this chart: State Bank of India (SBIN) — its two data sources disagree by up to 40% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Bank of Maharashtra has the lowest Gross NPA among the 13 Banks - PSU companies compared here, at 1.4%. Canara Bank is next at 1.6%. Bank of India has the lowest GNPA change at -1.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Bank of Maharashtra leads gross npa at 1.4%; Bank of India leads gnpa change at -1.4 percentage points.
LeaderBank of Maharashtra · 1.4%
Gap7.6% versus #2 · Canara Bank
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/13 companies · 169 observations
Investor read: Bank of Maharashtra sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current gnpa change signal.
Lower gross NPA is better. Improvement means the ratio is falling, so ranks are intentionally inverted.
Bank of Baroda has the lowest P/BV ÷ ROE among the 13 Banks - PSU companies compared here, at 0.06×. Bank of India has the lowest P/BV at 0.69×, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Bank of Baroda has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.06×, 0% below Bank of India. Only 13 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderBank of Baroda · 0.06×
Gap0% versus #2 · Bank of India
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/13 companies · 228 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
Banks are compared on P/BV and P/BV÷ROE, not PEG. Lower is better only if asset quality and return durability hold; cheap book value with weakening NPAs is not automatically attractive.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
This Banks - PSU comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 13 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 has second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROE can be manufactured with leverage. Read it beside ROA and asset quality.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
Banks and lenders are not forced through operating-margin or ROCE comparisons; missing lender-specific fields remain visibly missing.
1 company is missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
14 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 13 Banks - PSU companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-31. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-31 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.
15 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Banks - PSU company comparison FAQs
These 26 answers restate the Banks - PSU comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 13 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-31. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Banks - PSU sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
Banks - PSU has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 7% over 52 weeks and 3.7% over 13 weeks. 3 of 13 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 13 beat the sector itself.
Which Banks - PSU company is largest by income?
State Bank of India leads with income of ₹5,15,235 crore, based on 13 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Banks - PSU company is growing fastest?
Bank of Maharashtra has the fastest current income growth at 15.8%, across 13 of 13 comparable companies.
Which Banks - PSU company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Bank of Maharashtra ranks first at 77.5/100 with 100% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Banks - PSU company has the largest deposit base?
Punjab National Bank has the largest reported deposit base at ₹17,38,908 crore. Bank borrowings are operating funding, not industrial leverage.
Which Banks - PSU company has the lowest comparable P/BV-to-ROE?
Bank of Baroda has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.06, among 13 of 13 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Banks - PSU comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
What is the Nifty Banks - PSU index?
The Nifty Banks - PSU index tracks India's listed Banks - PSU companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 13 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Banks - PSU sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best Banks - PSU stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Bank of Maharashtra places first among 13 listed Banks - PSU companies, followed by Indian Overseas Bank. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Banks - PSU stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 13 listed Banks - PSU companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which Banks - PSU company is the biggest?
State Bank of India is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month income of ₹5,15,235 crore, ahead of Bank of Baroda at ₹1,36,547 crore. That covers 13 of 13 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Banks - PSU company makes the most profit?
State Bank of India earns the most, at ₹86,666 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 13 of 13 comparable companies. Indian Overseas Bank has the fastest profit growth at 51.8%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Banks - PSU lender has the best asset quality?
Bank of Maharashtra reports the lowest gross NPA ratio at 1.4% — lower is better — across 6 of 13 lenders. Read the direction as well as the level: a rising NPA ratio off a low base can matter more than a high but falling one.
Which Banks - PSU company earns the highest return on capital?
Bank of Maharashtra leads on return on assets at 2%, across 13 of 13 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Banks - PSU stock is the cheapest?
On price-to-book divided by return on equity — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Bank of Baroda screens cheapest at 0.06×. Only 13 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Banks - PSU lender has the largest funding base?
Punjab National Bank has the largest reported deposit base at ₹17,38,908 crore. For lenders, deposits and borrowings are operating inputs rather than leverage, so they are read against asset quality and returns instead of as debt.
Is the Banks - PSU sector beating the market?
Banks - PSU has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 7% over the last 52 weeks and 3.7% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 3 of 13 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Banks - PSU stock has the strongest price momentum?
Bank of Maharashtra has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Banks - PSU company scores highest for research priority?
Bank of Maharashtra scores 77.5 out of 100 with 100% evidence confidence, from 29.3 points on growth and earnings, 24.3 on capital efficiency, 9.9 on valuation and 14 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Banks - PSU companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 13 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Banks - PSU sector?
The 13 Banks - PSU companies on this page carry ₹19,16,560 crore of combined market value. State Bank of India is the largest at ₹9,48,354 crore, about 49% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-05.
What is the Banks - PSU sector's P/B ratio?
The median price-to-book ratio across the 13 Banks - PSU companies on this page is 1.1×, measured on the 13 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-05.
How is the Banks - PSU sector performing?
3 of the 13 covered Banks - PSU companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 7% ahead of NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-05.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.