Bank of Maharashtra (MAHABANK) — share price & stock analysis
Bad loans have fallen from 2.3% to 1.4%, profits are compounding — and the price has started to notice.
Bank of Maharashtra (MAHABANK) trades at ₹91.2 as of 1 July 2026, up 59% over the past year — beating NIFTY 500 for 47 weeks. The machine reads this as turnaround, richly priced: bad loans have fallen from 2.3% to 1.4%, profits are compounding — and the price has started to notice. It trades at a P/BV of 2.1× (the 90th percentile of its own range); the price is in Stage 2 — advancing, 53 weeks in; the business cycle reads DEEP CYCLICAL / AT PEAK. Fundamentals-momentum score: 81/100 (mostly improving).
Data as of 1 July 2026 · every number traces to its Screener source column · not investment advice.
- Market cap
- ₹70,147 Cr
- P/BV
- 2.11×
- ROE
- 22.6%
- vs own 10-yr valuation
- 90th pctile
- Book value / share
- ₹43.2
- EPS (TTM)
- ₹9.12
- 10-yr median P/BV
- 0.9×
- Revenue (FY26)
- ₹29,282 Cr
- Profit after tax (FY26)
- ₹7,017 Cr
- Weinstein stage
- Stage 2 (53 weeks)
- Data as of
- 1 July 2026
Profits swing violently in this business — real losses in FY17 and FY18 and FY19. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.net_profit
Where the clock stands now: earnings sit at 100% of their historical range, margins are near the top of their band, and the market pays the expensive end of its range (90th percentile). That reads as AT PEAK — everything looks great at once — record earnings, top-of-band margins, a full price. That is exactly when cycles turn, and no one rings a bell.net_profit
4 of the 5 things we track are currently moving the right way — nearly everything is pulling in the same direction.
Where the levels actually stand: ROE 23% — a genuinely good bank; GNPA 1.4% — clean book; the spread is near its 13-year high. Momentum says which way things are moving; these say where they are.
Read this number for what it is: it measures the DIRECTION of change, not the quality of the business. A mediocre business getting better scores high here; a great one having a soft quarter scores low. Profit, lending and bad loans count double, and a quarter of the score comes from our earnings-recovery lens (is the profit cycle turning up off its trough?).
The business grew faster than the stock
Since May 2016, earnings per share grew 840% while the stock is up 214%. The business has outrun its own share price.pricettm_eps
When profits grow faster than the price, the stock quietly gets cheaper while doing better — the market hasn’t fully caught up.
Today’s P/BV of 2.1× means the market is paying up — this is the expensive end of its own 10-year history (90th percentile).pb_ratio
Data: Price, EPS and valuation (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | EPS (TTM) (₹) | P/BV (×) |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16 | 29.7 | – | 0.4 |
| Jul 16 | 34.2 | – | 0.5 |
| Sep 16 | 32.7 | – | 0.4 |
| Nov 16 | 30.4 | – | 0.4 |
| Jan 17 | 29.4 | – | 0.4 |
| Mar 17 | 32.5 | – | 0.4 |
| May 17 | 33.0 | – | 0.4 |
| Jul 17 | 28.4 | – | 0.4 |
| Sep 17 | 25.9 | – | 0.4 |
| Nov 17 | 26.6 | – | 0.4 |
| Jan 18 | 20.6 | – | 0.3 |
| Mar 18 | 13.6 | – | 0.2 |
| Jun 18 | 13.3 | – | 0.2 |
| Aug 18 | 13.3 | – | – |
| Oct 18 | 11.2 | – | – |
| Dec 18 | 12.6 | – | – |
| Feb 19 | 13.5 | – | 0.7 |
| Apr 19 | 14.4 | – | 0.4 |
| Jun 19 | 15.9 | -17.3 | 0.4 |
| Aug 19 | 11.9 | – | 0.7 |
| Oct 19 | 9.8 | -13.8 | 0.5 |
| Dec 19 | 11.8 | – | 0.6 |
| Feb 20 | 11.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
| Apr 20 | 9.7 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| Jun 20 | 11.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| Aug 20 | 14.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Oct 20 | 11.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| Jan 21 | 13.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Mar 21 | 21.9 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| May 21 | 24.4 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| Jul 21 | 24.3 | 0.9 | 1.3 |
| Sep 21 | 18.2 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| Nov 21 | 20.9 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Jan 22 | 20.9 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Mar 22 | 17.9 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
| May 22 | 16.1 | 1.7 | 0.8 |
| Jul 22 | 17.2 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Sep 22 | 18.1 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Nov 22 | 27.4 | 2.5 | 1.2 |
| Jan 23 | 27.8 | 3.2 | 1.2 |
| Mar 23 | 24.8 | 3.1 | 1.2 |
| Jun 23 | 31.6 | 3.9 | 1.3 |
| Aug 23 | 33.9 | 4.5 | 1.4 |
| Oct 23 | 48.5 | 4.5 | 1.9 |
| Dec 23 | 46.2 | 5.0 | 1.8 |
| Feb 24 | 61.5 | 5.3 | 2.2 |
| Apr 24 | 63.6 | 5.3 | 2.6 |
| Jun 24 | 66.3 | 5.8 | 2.4 |
| Aug 24 | 61.2 | 6.3 | 2.0 |
| Oct 24 | 54.3 | 6.9 | 1.7 |
| Dec 24 | 54.7 | 6.9 | 1.7 |
| Feb 25 | 49.7 | 7.3 | 1.4 |
| Apr 25 | 50.0 | 7.5 | 1.7 |
| Jun 25 | 54.3 | 7.2 | 1.4 |
| Aug 25 | 52.0 | 7.6 | 1.4 |
| Oct 25 | 59.0 | 7.9 | 1.4 |
| Jan 26 | 63.9 | 7.9 | 1.5 |
| Feb 26 | 68.8 | 8.4 | 1.6 |
| Apr 26 | 72.7 | 9.1 | 1.9 |
| Jun 26 | 79.2 | 9.1 | 2.1 |
| Jul 26 | 91.2 | 9.1 | 2.1 |
Price is the weekly close (₹). EPS is trailing-twelve-month profit per share, anchored on Screener's own snapshots; between snapshots it is filled from price ÷ P/E (an exact identity), and any fill straying more than 18% from the neighbouring snapshots is dropped rather than shown. The lower panel is the P/BV — what the market pays per rupee of book value; the dotted line is its long-run median (0.9×).
Stage 2: the trend is up, and has been for 53 weeks
STAGE 2 · ADVANCING · 53 WEEKSPrice trends have a life cycle: they base (1), advance (2), top out (3) and decline (4). This chart is in Stage 2: advancing — 53 weeks so far, confirmed.stage
The price sits above its rising 200-day average (₹70 today) — trends like this persist more often than they reverse, which is why the system rides them instead of guessing the top.dma_200
Beating NIFTY 500 for 47 weeks — relative strength is the market’s live opinion, and right now it is on this stock’s side.rs_mansfield
What would end it: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the house exit rule — mechanical, no debates.dma_200
Data: Weekly price, moving averages and stage (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | 200-DMA (₹) | 50-DMA (₹) | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16 | 28.4 | 33.6 | 30.1 | 4 |
| May 16 | 28.0 | 31.8 | 29.4 | 4 |
| Aug 16 | 31.6 | 31.8 | 32.0 | 4 |
| Nov 16 | 29.1 | 31.4 | 30.8 | 4 |
| Jan 17 | 29.8 | 30.5 | 29.5 | 4 |
| Apr 17 | 33.9 | 31.9 | 33.5 | 2 |
| Jul 17 | 28.9 | 31.5 | 30.3 | 4 |
| Oct 17 | 25.3 | 29.4 | 26.6 | 4 |
| Dec 17 | 22.9 | 27.7 | 25.0 | 4 |
| Mar 18 | 13.7 | 23.6 | 17.6 | 4 |
| Jun 18 | 13.6 | 19.3 | 14.0 | 4 |
| Sep 18 | 12.8 | 16.4 | 12.9 | 4 |
| Nov 18 | 13.0 | 14.8 | 12.9 | 4 |
| Feb 19 | 12.7 | 14.4 | 13.6 | 4 |
| May 19 | 14.2 | 14.5 | 14.9 | 4 |
| Aug 19 | 12.2 | 14.7 | 14.5 | 2 |
| Nov 19 | 12.4 | 13.3 | 11.6 | 4 |
| Jan 20 | 13.3 | 13.0 | 12.6 | 4 |
| Apr 20 | 9.4 | 11.9 | 10.1 | 4 |
| Jul 20 | 11.6 | 11.1 | 10.5 | 4 |
| Oct 20 | 11.2 | 11.6 | 12.0 | 2 |
| Dec 20 | 13.3 | 11.9 | 12.7 | 2 |
| Mar 21 | 18.9 | 14.7 | 19.1 | 2 |
| Jun 21 | 26.6 | 18.8 | 24.3 | 2 |
| Sep 21 | 18.1 | 20.1 | 20.9 | 2 |
| Nov 21 | 19.9 | 20.1 | 20.5 | 4 |
| Feb 22 | 18.9 | 20.1 | 20.1 | 3 |
| May 22 | 15.7 | 19.1 | 17.8 | 4 |
| Aug 22 | 17.3 | 17.9 | 16.7 | 4 |
| Oct 22 | 20.8 | 18.1 | 18.5 | 1 |
| Jan 23 | 31.3 | 22.9 | 29.0 | 2 |
| Apr 23 | 27.6 | 24.4 | 26.4 | 2 |
| Jul 23 | 32.0 | 26.7 | 29.2 | 2 |
| Sep 23 | 47.6 | 32.2 | 40.4 | 2 |
| Dec 23 | 45.6 | 37.8 | 44.8 | 2 |
| Mar 24 | 59.4 | 45.9 | 56.9 | 2 |
| Jun 24 | 66.7 | 54.1 | 65.0 | 2 |
| Aug 24 | 62.6 | 58.5 | 63.8 | 2 |
| Nov 24 | 52.9 | 57.2 | 55.2 | 4 |
| Feb 25 | 47.7 | 54.9 | 51.4 | 4 |
| May 25 | 48.3 | 52.1 | 48.9 | 4 |
| Aug 25 | 54.3 | 53.5 | 55.2 | 2 |
| Oct 25 | 58.9 | 54.4 | 56.3 | 2 |
| Jan 26 | 66.5 | 56.7 | 60.1 | 2 |
| Apr 26 | 70.6 | 60.9 | 65.9 | 2 |
| Jun 26 | 87.3 | 67.3 | 77.5 | 2 |
| Jul 26 | 91.2 | 69.9 | 82.3 | 2 |
Losses, then a rebuild: profits are at an all-time high
Over 12 years, income went from ₹11,957 Cr to ₹29,282 Cr (about 8% a year), and profit from ₹399 Cr to ₹7,017 Cr.revenuenet_profit
The books show real losses in FY17 and FY18 and FY19 (worst: ₹−4,763 Cr). Everything about today’s cheap-looking numbers must be read against that history — the recovery is what you are buying.net_profit
Data: Revenue by year
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 11,957 |
| FY15 | 12,665 |
| FY16 | 13,053 |
| FY17 | 12,062 |
| FY18 | 11,096 |
| FY19 | 10,850 |
| FY20 | 11,496 |
| FY21 | 11,869 |
| FY22 | 13,019 |
| FY23 | 15,899 |
| FY24 | 20,495 |
| FY25 | 24,948 |
| FY26 | 29,282 |
Data: Profit by year
| Period | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 399 |
| FY15 | 465 |
| FY16 | 118 |
| FY17 | -1,356 |
| FY18 | -1,112 |
| FY19 | -4,763 |
| FY20 | 399 |
| FY21 | 571 |
| FY22 | 1,153 |
| FY23 | 2,605 |
| FY24 | 4,072 |
| FY25 | 5,542 |
| FY26 | 7,017 |
Data: Spread % by year
| Period | Spread % (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 29.4 |
| FY15 | 30.6 |
| FY16 | 29.7 |
| FY17 | 26.3 |
| FY18 | 30.6 |
| FY19 | 34.4 |
| FY20 | 37.2 |
| FY21 | 41.3 |
| FY22 | 46.4 |
| FY23 | 48.7 |
| FY24 | 47.9 |
| FY25 | 46.8 |
| FY26 | 46.7 |
The loan book is working — interest income grew 15%
Mar 26 income was ₹7,755 Cr, up 15% on a year ago. A bank grows by lending more and charging well — this line is both together.revenue
Data: Quarterly interest + fee income
| Period | Income (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 4,789 | – |
| Sep 23 | 5,068 | – |
| Dec 23 | 5,172 | – |
| Mar 24 | 5,467 | – |
| Jun 24 | 5,875 | 22.7 |
| Sep 24 | 6,017 | 18.7 |
| Dec 24 | 6,325 | 22.3 |
| Mar 25 | 6,731 | 23.1 |
| Jun 25 | 7,054 | 20.1 |
| Sep 25 | 7,128 | 18.5 |
| Dec 25 | 7,344 | 16.1 |
| Mar 26 | 7,755 | 15.2 |
The squeeze is easing — the spread bottomed at 46% and is mending
Of every ₹100 of interest the bank earns, ₹52 goes straight out as interest on deposits and borrowings. It keeps ₹48 — up 1 point from a year ago.revenueinterest_expense
The visible arc: squeezed from 49% down to 46% (Sep 25) as deposits repriced faster than loans, and recovering since. The direction matters more than the level now.interest_expense
Data: Share of interest income kept, quarterly
| Period | Spread kept (%) |
|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 48.9 |
| Sep 23 | 48.0 |
| Dec 23 | 47.7 |
| Mar 24 | 47.3 |
| Jun 24 | 47.7 |
| Sep 24 | 46.7 |
| Dec 24 | 46.5 |
| Mar 25 | 46.3 |
| Jun 25 | 46.7 |
| Sep 25 | 45.6 |
| Dec 25 | 46.6 |
| Mar 26 | 47.7 |
Bad loans are healing — from a worst of 2.3% (Jun 23) to 1.4%
₹1.4 of every ₹100 lent is currently stuck with borrowers who’ve stopped paying — down from ₹2.3 at the Jun 23 worst. After the money already set aside, the true exposure is 0.1%.gross_npa_pctnet_npa_pct
Falling bad loans do double duty: less money set aside for losses flows straight back into profit — and the profit bridge this year shows exactly that. The tailwind eventually runs out; the loan book has to take over.gross_npa_pctnet_profit
Data: Bad loans as % of the book, quarterly
| Period | Gross NPA (%) | Net NPA (after provisions) (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 2.3 | 0.2 |
| Sep 23 | 2.2 | 0.2 |
| Dec 23 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
| Mar 24 | 1.9 | 0.2 |
| Jun 24 | 1.9 | 0.2 |
| Sep 24 | 1.8 | 0.2 |
| Dec 24 | 1.8 | 0.2 |
| Mar 25 | 1.7 | 0.2 |
| Jun 25 | 1.7 | 0.2 |
| Sep 25 | 1.7 | 0.2 |
| Dec 25 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| Mar 26 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
Profit jumped 36% year on year
Mar 26 profit was ₹2,045 Cr, up 36% on last year — earnings per share of ₹2.66.net_profiteps
Data: Quarterly profit after tax
| Period | PAT (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 884 | – |
| Sep 23 | 920 | – |
| Dec 23 | 1,038 | – |
| Mar 24 | 1,230 | – |
| Jun 24 | 1,295 | 46.5 |
| Sep 24 | 1,333 | 44.9 |
| Dec 24 | 1,412 | 36.0 |
| Mar 25 | 1,502 | 22.1 |
| Jun 25 | 1,504 | 16.1 |
| Sep 25 | 1,669 | 25.2 |
| Dec 25 | 1,799 | 27.4 |
| Mar 26 | 2,045 | 36.2 |
The biggest force in the bridge: lending more.
Data: Where the profit change came from (Mar 25 → Mar 26)
| Component | Effect (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| PAT Mar 25 | 1,502 |
| More interest income | +1,024 |
| Costlier deposits | −438 |
| Running costs & provisions | +249 |
| Fees & other income | −43 |
| Tax | −250 |
| Provisions & everything else | +1 |
| PAT Mar 26 | 2,045 |
You are paying near the top of its own range
Today you pay ₹2.11 for every ₹1 of book value, against a long-run median of ₹0.90. It has traded cheaper than this only 90% of the time since 2016.pb_ratio
Data: Price-to-book over time (weekly) (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | P/BV (x) |
|---|---|
| Feb 16 | 0.4 |
| Apr 16 | 0.4 |
| Jul 16 | 0.5 |
| Sept 16 | 0.4 |
| Nov 16 | 0.4 |
| Feb 17 | 0.5 |
| Apr 17 | 0.5 |
| Jun 17 | 0.5 |
| Sept 17 | 0.4 |
| Nov 17 | 0.4 |
| Jan 18 | 0.3 |
| Mar 18 | 0.2 |
| Jun 18 | 0.2 |
| Feb 19 | 0.6 |
| Apr 19 | 0.5 |
| Jul 19 | 0.4 |
| Sept 19 | 0.7 |
| Nov 19 | 0.7 |
| Feb 20 | 0.7 |
| Apr 20 | 0.3 |
| Jun 20 | 0.3 |
| Aug 20 | 0.8 |
| Nov 20 | 0.6 |
| Jan 21 | 0.8 |
| Mar 21 | 1.1 |
| Jun 21 | 1.6 |
| Aug 21 | 1.1 |
| Oct 21 | 1.1 |
| Dec 21 | 1.0 |
| Mar 22 | 0.9 |
| May 22 | 0.8 |
| Jul 22 | 0.8 |
| Oct 22 | 0.8 |
| Dec 22 | 1.4 |
| Feb 23 | 1.1 |
| May 23 | 1.5 |
| Jul 23 | 1.2 |
| Sept 23 | 1.9 |
| Dec 23 | 1.7 |
| Feb 24 | 2.2 |
| Apr 24 | 2.6 |
| Jun 24 | 2.3 |
| Sept 24 | 2.0 |
| Nov 24 | 1.6 |
| Jan 25 | 1.4 |
| Apr 25 | 1.6 |
| Jun 25 | 1.5 |
| Aug 25 | 1.5 |
| Oct 25 | 1.4 |
| Jan 26 | 1.4 |
| Mar 26 | 1.6 |
| Apr 26 | 2.1 |
| Jun 26 | 2.1 |
| Jul 26 | 2.1 |
Promoters have trimmed their stake — 12.9 points over 8 quarters
Promoters hold 73.6% (down 12.9 points over 8 quarters). Foreign funds own 5.5%, domestic funds 13.9%.promoters_pctfiis_pctdiis_pct
Domestic funds tell the real story: they sold from 6.4% down to 4.5% (Sep 24), and have been buying back since — now 13.9%. A completed round trip like that usually means the doubts got answered.diis_pct
Data: Who holds the shares, quarterly
| Period | Promoters (%) | Foreign funds (%) | Domestic funds (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 86.5 | 0.7 | 6.4 |
| Sep 23 | 86.5 | 0.6 | 5.2 |
| Dec 23 | 86.5 | 0.5 | 4.7 |
| Mar 24 | 86.5 | 1.0 | 4.7 |
| Jun 24 | 86.5 | 1.2 | 4.6 |
| Sep 24 | 86.5 | 1.3 | 4.5 |
| Dec 24 | 79.6 | 1.5 | 10.9 |
| Mar 25 | 79.6 | 1.7 | 10.7 |
| Jun 25 | 79.6 | 1.9 | 10.4 |
| Sep 25 | 79.6 | 2.4 | 10.1 |
| Dec 25 | 73.6 | 4.9 | 13.5 |
| Mar 26 | 73.6 | 5.6 | 13.9 |
- There is no new bad-loan cycle forming — GNPA is at or near its 8-quarter low of 1.45%.gross_npa_pct
- Funding costs are not blowing up — interest paid has stayed near 52% of income all through.interest_expense
Strong on the data — worth the deeper look if the story keeps its promises
The numbers lean positive, and the price hasn’t fully caught up with the improvement.
Best thing in the data: profit rising (₹1,502 Cr → ₹2,045 Cr).net_profit
Biggest worry: promoter holding falling (79.6% → 73.6%).promoters_pct
Machine-written research from Screener data — every number traces to its source column. Sector Alpha is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser; nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell. Not investment advice.
Straight answers from the data
What does Bank of Maharashtra do?
Bank of Maharashtra is engaged in providing banking services. The Bank's segments include Treasury, Corporate/Wholesale Banking, Retail Banking and Other banking operations.[1]. It is listed in the Banks - PSU sector with a market capitalisation of ₹70,147 Cr.
What is Bank of Maharashtra's share price?
As of 1 July 2026, Bank of Maharashtra trades at ₹91.2, up 59% over the past year, with a market capitalisation of ₹70,147 Cr. Beating NIFTY 500 for 47 weeks. Prices are weekly closes from Screener data; this page refreshes with each weekly update.
What is Bank of Maharashtra's share price target?
Sector Alpha does not publish broker-style price targets. Our discounted-cash-flow model estimates Bank of Maharashtra's intrinsic value at ₹151 per share under base assumptions (bear ₹86.0, bull ₹151), against the current price of ₹91.2 — a 70% margin of safety. The current price already implies roughly 3% annual earnings growth. These are model estimates, not forecasts — treat them as one input alongside the valuation history below, not as a target.
Is Bank of Maharashtra stock overvalued or undervalued?
Bank of Maharashtra trades at a P/BV of 2.1× — the 90th percentile of its own 10.2-year trading range (median 0.9×), which is near the top of its own historical range. The business grew faster than the stock. Since May 2016, earnings per share grew 840% while the stock is up 214%. The business has outrun its own share price.
What did Bank of Maharashtra report in its latest quarterly results?
In its most recent reported quarter (Q4 FY26, quarter ended March 2026): Mar 26 income was ₹7,755 Cr, up 15% on a year ago. A bank grows by lending more and charging well — this line is both together. Mar 26 profit was ₹2,045 Cr, up 36% on last year — earnings per share of ₹2.66. Figures are from Screener-scraped quarterly filings; the page updates when the next quarter is filed.
Is Bank of Maharashtra growing?
The loan book is working — interest income grew 15%. Mar 26 income was ₹7,755 Cr, up 15% on a year ago. A bank grows by lending more and charging well — this line is both together.
Are Bank of Maharashtra's profits growing?
Profit jumped 36% year on year. Mar 26 profit was ₹2,045 Cr, up 36% on last year — earnings per share of ₹2.66.
How much of its interest income does Bank of Maharashtra keep?
The squeeze is easing — the spread bottomed at 46% and is mending. Of every ₹100 of interest the bank earns, ₹52 goes straight out as interest on deposits and borrowings. It keeps ₹48 — up 1 point from a year ago.
What is Bank of Maharashtra's long-term growth record?
Revenue grew from ₹11,957 Cr in FY14 to ₹29,282 Cr in FY26 — a 7.7% compound annual growth rate over 12 years. Profit after tax compounded at 27.0% over the same period (₹399 Cr → ₹7,017 Cr).
Is Bank of Maharashtra stock in an uptrend?
Stage 2: the trend is up, and has been for 53 weeks. Bank of Maharashtra is in Stage 2 — advancing, 53 weeks in (confirmed). Stages follow Stan Weinstein's four-phase read of weekly price against the 200-day average: basing (1), advancing (2), topping (3), declining (4).
Why is Bank of Maharashtra stock rising?
The price is up 59% over the past year, in a confirmed Stage 2 uptrend (53 weeks), and has beaten NIFTY 500 for 47 weeks. Since 2016, the price is up 214% while earnings per share moved 840%.
Is Bank of Maharashtra beating the NIFTY 500?
Yes — beating NIFTY 500 for 47 weeks, as of 1 July 2026. Relative strength is measured weekly against the NIFTY 500 (Mansfield RS): a positive reading means the stock has outperformed the index over the trailing window, week after week.
Where is Bank of Maharashtra in its business cycle?
The data reads Bank of Maharashtra as a deep cyclical business currently in its at peak phase — earnings at an all-time high for this company, valuation at the 90th percentile. Profits swing violently in this business — real losses in FY17 and FY18 and FY19. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.
Who owns Bank of Maharashtra — what is the promoter holding?
Promoters hold 73.6% (down 12.9 points over 8 quarters). Foreign funds own 5.5%, domestic funds 13.9%. Domestic funds tell the real story: they sold from 6.4% down to 4.5% (Sep 24), and have been buying back since — now 13.9%. A completed round trip like that usually means the doubts got answered. Shareholding is from Screener's quarterly filings data.
How is Bank of Maharashtra's asset quality?
Bad loans are healing — from a worst of 2.3% (Jun 23) to 1.4%. ₹1.4 of every ₹100 lent is currently stuck with borrowers who’ve stopped paying — down from ₹2.3 at the Jun 23 worst. After the money already set aside, the true exposure is 0.1%.
What is the bull case for Bank of Maharashtra?
Bad loans have fallen from 2.3% to 1.4%, profits are compounding — and the price has started to notice. Best thing in the data: profit rising (₹1,502 Cr → ₹2,045 Cr). The loan book is working — interest income grew 15%.
What is the bear case for Bank of Maharashtra — what could break the story?
Biggest worry: promoter holding falling (79.6% → 73.6%). Two quarters of profit reversing would kill this story. The nearest-term thing to watch: a single quarter of GNPA rising again would put this story on watch. This falsification condition is stated up front so the thesis can be checked against incoming quarters, not defended after the fact.
Is Bank of Maharashtra a stock worth studying right now?
Sector Alpha does not publish buy or sell recommendations — this is a research read, not advice. What the data says: strong on the data — worth the deeper look if the story keeps its promises. The numbers lean positive, and the price hasn’t fully caught up with the improvement. Across the 7-model scorecard the composite research signal is study deeper at 90% confidence. This is machine-written research compiled from Screener data — every number traces to its source — and it is not investment advice. Do your own diligence.