Seagate Technology Holdings plc
STXSeagate Technology Holdings plc's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +446.0% in a year while annual EPS moved +328.5% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (60 weeks in). But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc trades at $845, in a confirmed uptrend and 60 weeks into that stage. That is +61.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 75% of a 52-week range of $154 to $1,070. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 67 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 60 of stage 2. At $845 it trades +61.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 75% of its 52-week range ($154–$1,070).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +3,420% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 67 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc trades at 59.8× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 59.8× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +328.5% against a +446.0% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +133.0%/yr price move, ~+55.4%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+77.6 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Seagate Technology Holdings plc reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +38.9% | −7.9% | — | — |
| Profit | +332.4% | −3.8% | — | — |
| EPS | +328.5% | −2.7% | — | — |
| Stock price | +446.0% | +133.0% | +55.8% | +38.7% |
4-Factor Sector Score
63.6/100 — rank 3 of 29 in Computer Hardware · 56% evidence confidence
Seagate Technology Holdings plc scores 63.6 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Computer Hardware, ranking 3. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 21.5 + 20.1 + 8.9 + 13.1 = 63.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc reported $3.1 B of revenue in the Apr 26 quarter, +44.0% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at −3.9% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $9.1 B. The last four reported quarters add to $11.0 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $9.1 B (+38.9% on the year), capping 4 years at −3.9% compound. The latest quarter (Apr 26) printed $3.1 B, +44.0% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +31.4% growth against the decade's −3.9% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +28.8% over the last 4 quarters against +32.6%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's operating margin is 32.2% in the Apr 26 quarter, +12.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −4.6% to 20.8%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 32.2%, +12.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −4.6%–20.8%, and FY25's 20.8% is the top of that band — a record year.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +12.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +11.4 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc earned $0.8 B of net profit in the Apr 26 quarter, +120.6% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $1.5 B. The 4-year compound rate is 2.9%. That is 24.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.3 B. 3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Apr 26 profit was $0.8 B, +120.6% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $1.5 B (+332.4%), and the 4-year compound rate is 2.9%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +44.0% and the margin +12.3 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +66.7% vs revenue +31.4%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 106% of Seagate Technology Holdings plc's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $1.1 B of operating cash against $1.5 B of profit. After $0.3 B of capital spending, $0.8 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $1.1 B against reported profit of $1.5 B, leaving free cash of $0.8 B after $0.3 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 106% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Seagate Technology Holdings plc does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $1.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 3.7% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $1.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc earns a ROE of −327% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +73.9 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 16.2% net margin on 1.13× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is −327%.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 16.2% net margin × 1.13× asset turns × −17.82× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −326.2% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 89.4% − 15.5% = a +73.9 pp spread. The 15.5% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc paid $2.92 per share over the last four reported quarters, up 2.8% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $0.74 for Apr 26. Against the current price of $845 that is a trailing yield of 0.35%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc paid $2.92 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $0.74 for Apr 26. That is up 2.8% against the same quarter a year earlier. Against the current price of $845 the trailing twelve months work out to 0.35% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc carries total debt of $3.6 B against shareholder equity of $2.2 B as of Jul 26, a debt-to-equity of 1.64. On the annual view that ratio went from 8.16 in FY21 to 1.64 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Jul 26: total debt of $3.6 B against shareholder equity of $2.2 B — a debt-to-equity of 1.64. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 8.16 (FY21) to 1.64 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
3.2% of Seagate Technology Holdings plc's tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.4 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 3.2% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 1.4 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc: the Z-score reads 5.32. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 5.32 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 5.32.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Dell Technologies Inc.DELL | 78.2/100Favorable setup81% evidence | LEADER | 27.9/35 Revenue 38.6% · PAT 84.8% · OPM change 3.3 pp 83% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 9.5% · OPM 8.3% 76% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 16.7× · PEG 0.36 65% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 76% · RS bench 106.8% · 1Y 239.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.9 + 15.1 + 15.2 + 20 = 78.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Sandisk CorporationSNDK | 64.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 68.2 pp 39% evidence | 19.9/25 ROCE 30.7% · OPM 69.1% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 24.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector 64.8% · RS bench 82.3% · 1Y 3119.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 19.9 + 9.4 + 13.3 = 64.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Seagate Technology Holdings plcthis pageSTX | 63.6/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 21.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8.9 pp 39% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 25.5% · OPM 32.1% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 59× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 42.8% · RS bench 65.5% · 1Y 461.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 20.1 + 8.9 + 13.1 = 63.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Western Digital CorporationWDC | 59.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | LEADER | 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 9.6 pp 39% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 11% · OPM 35.7% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 17.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 48% · RS bench 70.9% · 1Y 631.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 15.9 + 9.8 + 13.2 = 59.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Arista Networks, Inc.ANET | 54.0/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | TURNING | 19.2/35 Revenue 30.6% · PAT 22.9% · OPM change -0.1 pp 53% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 8.7% · OPM 42.7% 57% evidence | 6.9/20 P/E 42× · PEG 1.77 65% evidence | 12.6/20 RS sector -5.5% · RS bench 17.6% · 1Y 36.9%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.2 + 15.3 + 6.9 + 12.6 = 54 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Logitech International S.A.LOGI | 53.1/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 39% evidence | 16.0/25 ROCE 9.9% · OPM 12.5% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 17.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -24.8% · RS bench -5.2% · 1Y 10.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 16 + 10 + 7.5 = 53.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Super Micro Computer, Inc.SMCI | 51.8/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.4/35 Revenue 56.2% · PAT 9.3% · OPM change 2.9 pp 53% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 6.1% 57% evidence | 11.6/20 P/E 12× · PEG 1.02 65% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -36.1% · RS bench -18.6% · 1Y -28.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 13.1 + 11.6 + 6.7 = 51.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8AstroNova, Inc.ALOT | 50.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 14.7/35 Revenue -2.6% · PAT — · OPM change 2.5 pp 62% evidence | 9.7/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 4% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 24.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 66.9% · RS bench 99.5% · 1Y 151.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.7 + 9.7 + 9.6 + 16.6 = 50.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9HP Inc.HPQ | 50.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 10.7/35 Revenue 5.7% · PAT 1.4% · OPM change -0.7 pp 83% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 4.2% 76% evidence | 14.9/20 P/E 7.7× · PEG 0.5 65% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector -13.5% · RS bench 9.6% · 1Y 10.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.7 + 12.4 + 14.9 + 12.5 = 50.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 10Everpure, Inc.P | 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | FADING | 20.2/35 Revenue 21% · PAT 76.6% · OPM change 5.9 pp 62% evidence | 9.9/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 1.9% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 105.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.9/20 RS sector -19.9% · RS bench 0.7% · 1Y 43.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 9.9 + 8.5 + 9.9 = 48.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Cricut, Inc.CRCT | 47.7/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence | TURNING | 13.5/35 Revenue -0.4% · PAT 9% · OPM change -3.6 pp 53% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 14.4% 57% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 10.7× · PEG 0.83 65% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -30% · RS bench -10.6% · 1Y -15.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 14.1 + 13.5 + 6.6 = 47.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Unusual Machines, Inc.UMAC | 55.7/100Thin evidence · provisional42% evidence | LEADER | 22.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 70.3 pp 40% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE -4.1% · OPM -89.7% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 33% · RS bench 60.1% · 1Y 164.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 8.1 + 10 + 15.2 = 55.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13One Stop Systems, Inc.OSS | 52.9/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | FADING | 19.9/35 Revenue 12.8% · PAT — · OPM change 36.9 pp 40% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE -1.8% · OPM -8.3% 57% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.7/20 RS sector 15.2% · RS bench 36.6% · 1Y 160.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 9 + 9.3 + 14.7 = 52.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 143D Systems CorporationDDD | 51.7/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | LEADER | 17.5/35 Revenue -10.2% · PAT — · OPM change 31.9 pp 40% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE -1.6% · OPM -7% 57% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 7.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.1/20 RS sector 5.2% · RS bench 29.8% · 1Y 100%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 9 + 11.1 + 14.1 = 51.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15Corsair Gaming, Inc.CRSR | 51.3/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.6/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT — · OPM change 4.5 pp 40% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 3.9% 57% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 69.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.6/20 RS sector 11% · RS bench 38.5% · 1Y 25.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 10.4 + 8.7 + 14.6 = 51.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Virtuix Holdings Inc.VTIX | 50.0/100Thin evidence · provisional0% evidence | 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE — · OPM — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-10 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 12.5 + 10 + 10 = 50 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Braiin LimitedBRAI | 46.1/100Thin evidence · provisional20% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 24% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 11.1% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —1 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 12.7 + 10 + 10 = 46.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Quantum CorporationQMCO | 46.0/100Thin evidence · provisional42% evidence | LEADER | 14.6/35 Revenue 2.2% · PAT — · OPM change 15.6 pp 40% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM -3.3% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector -1% · RS bench 22% · 1Y 46.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 9.6 + 10 + 11.8 = 46 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Velo3D, Inc.VELO | 45.9/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | FADING | 21.4/35 Revenue 27.5% · PAT — · OPM change 73.3 pp 40% evidence | 6.9/25 ROCE -9.9% · OPM -50.3% 57% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 16.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -22.3% · RS bench -8.7% · 1Y 85%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 6.9 + 10.4 + 7.2 = 45.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Bgin Blockchain LimitedBGIN | 44.9/100Thin evidence · provisional15% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 8.5/25 ROCE -43.3% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —1 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 8.5 + 10 + 10 = 44.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21AMC Robotics CorporationAMCI | 44.5/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.9 pp 15% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 7.2% · OPM 22.8% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.4/20 RS sector -54.5% · RS bench -43.5% · 1Y -59.9%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18 + 13.1 + 10 + 3.4 = 44.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Quantum Computing Inc.QUBT | 43.7/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 20689.4 pp 29% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE -2.2% · OPM -556.8% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -45% · RS bench -29.2% · 1Y -42.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 8.2 + 10 + 6 = 43.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23IonQ, Inc.IONQ | 41.6/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 580.5 pp 40% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE -7.4% · OPM -419.8% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 2.7/20 RS sector -37% · RS bench -21.2% · 1Y -0.3%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.6 + 7.3 + 10 + 2.7 = 41.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Rigetti Computing, Inc.RGTI | 41.1/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.1/35 Revenue 25% · PAT — · OPM change 879.8 pp 40% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE -6.1% · OPM -589.8% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 2.5/20 RS sector -44.4% · RS bench -29.8% · 1Y 13%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 7.5 + 10 + 2.5 = 41.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Nano Dimension Ltd.NNDM | 41.0/100Thin evidence · provisional42% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 73.9 pp 40% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE -9.5% · OPM -217% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -31.3% · RS bench -13.6% · 1Y 18.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.2 + 6.8 + 10 + 6 = 41 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Stratasys Ltd.SSYS | 38.0/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | BASING | 12.2/35 Revenue -2.8% · PAT — · OPM change -10.9 pp 40% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE -3% · OPM -20% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -34.2% · RS bench -16.6% · 1Y -20.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 8.2 + 10 + 7.6 = 38 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Draganfly Inc.DPRO | 37.7/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.3/35 Revenue 0% · PAT — · OPM change -96.6 pp 40% evidence | 6.2/25 ROCE -16% · OPM -329.3% 57% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 1.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.7/20 RS sector -52.9% · RS bench -40.7% · 1Y -11.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 6.2 + 11.5 + 3.7 = 37.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28Canaan Inc.CAN | 36.6/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.1/35 Revenue 60.1% · PAT — · OPM change -41.1 pp 40% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE -15.5% · OPM -86.6% 57% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 5.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -79.8% · RS bench -73.6% · 1Y -72.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 7.2 + 11.3 + 3 = 36.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29D-Wave Quantum Inc.QBTS | 35.0/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | FADING | 11.8/35 Revenue -38.1% · PAT — · OPM change -1839.6 pp 40% evidence | 8.0/25 ROCE -7.4% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -31.2% · RS bench -14.1% · 1Y 29.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 8 + 10 + 5.2 = 35 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Seagate Technology Holdings plc's stock price today?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc trades at $845, +446.0% over the past year. The company is valued at $192 B. The stock sits at 75% of its 52-week range of $154–$1,070, +61.1% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 60 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Seagate Technology Holdings plc's latest quarterly results?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc reported revenue of $3.1 B and net profit of $0.8 B for the Apr 26 quarter. Revenue rose 44.0% and profit rose 120.6% year on year. Earnings per share were $3.27. The operating margin was 32.2%, 12.3 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Seagate Technology Holdings plc's revenue?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc reported revenue of $3.1 B in the Apr 26 quarter, +44.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $9.1 B (+38.9%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −3.9% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Seagate Technology Holdings plc's profit?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc earned $0.8 B of net profit in the Apr 26 quarter, +120.6% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $1.5 B. The operating margin ran 32.2% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Seagate Technology Holdings plc's market cap?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's market capitalisation is $192 B at a stock price of $845. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Seagate Technology Holdings plc pay a dividend?
Yes — Seagate Technology Holdings plc declared $0.74 per share for Apr 26, and $2.92 per share across the last four reported quarters. The latest quarter is up 2.8% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Seagate Technology Holdings plc's dividend per share?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's most recently declared dividend is $0.74 per share for Apr 26, giving $2.92 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Seagate Technology Holdings plc's dividend yield?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's trailing dividend yield is 0.35%: $2.92 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $845. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Seagate Technology Holdings plc growing?
Yes — Seagate Technology Holdings plc is growing: latest-quarter revenue +44.0% year on year, profit +120.6%, and the margin +12.3 pp at 32.2%. The 4-year compound rates are −3.9% (revenue) and 2.9% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Seagate Technology Holdings plc performing?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc is in a confirmed uptrend, 60 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 44.0% and profit rose 120.6% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 67 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Seagate Technology Holdings plc in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 60 of stage 2), trading +61.1% versus its 200-day average and at 75% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Seagate Technology Holdings plc beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Seagate Technology Holdings plc has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 67 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +3,420% against the S&P 500's +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Seagate Technology Holdings plc's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Seagate Technology Holdings plc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $845, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 60 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Seagate Technology Holdings plc?
Somewhat — short interest is 3.2% of Seagate Technology Holdings plc's tradable float, about 1.4 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Seagate Technology Holdings plc have too much debt?
It carries real leverage — Seagate Technology Holdings plc's debt-to-equity is 1.65. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Seagate Technology Holdings plc's capex?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc spent $1.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.3 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Seagate Technology Holdings plc's cash flow?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc generated $1.1 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.8 B of free cash flow after $0.3 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $1.5 B, so operating cash ran behind profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Seagate Technology Holdings plc's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 106% of Seagate Technology Holdings plc's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $1.1 B against reported profit of $1.5 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Seagate Technology Holdings plc?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 5.32 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Seagate Technology Holdings plc in its business cycle?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's FY25 operating margin was 20.8%, against a 5-year band of −4.6%–20.8%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 32.2%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Seagate Technology Holdings plc story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +446.0% in a year while annual EPS moved +328.5% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Seagate Technology Holdings plc a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Seagate Technology Holdings plc's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.