Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-19
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-19

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.

SPCX
Industrials · Aerospace & Defense

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.

The price is between stages. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.

Price
$153
Revenue (Jun 26)
$7.8 B
+91.9% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
$−0.5 B
Operating margin
−1.8%
+17.4 pp YoY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. trades at $153, between stages. It sits at 58% of a 52-week range of $108 to $185. On relative strength it has no relative-strength read yet.

Today the stock is between stages. At $153 it trades near its long-run average and sits at 58% of its 52-week range ($108–$185).

Sep 26: $153 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
week — of stage —
Price50-day avg
$191$169$147$124$102$$153Jun 26Jul 26Jul 26Aug 26Sep 26
$191$169$147$124$102$$153Jun 26Jul 26Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 4 months the stock moved −17% while the S&P 500 moved +2% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: no trailing-13-week read yet — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

P/E does not price Space Exploration Technologies Corp. — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. On sales the market values Space Exploration Technologies Corp. at 111.0× its FY25 revenue of $18.7 B.

With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.

P/E
earnings negative
PEG
0.37
as reported

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read.

Growth, year by year: revenue +33.2% in FY25 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoY
35.0%34.5%34.0%33.6%33.1%%33.2%FY23FY24FY25
35.0%34.5%34.0%33.6%33.1%%33.2%FY23FY24FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
Revenue
98%76%54%31%9.1%%91.9%Mar 25Sep 25Jun 26
98%76%54%31%9.1%%91.9%Mar 25Sep 25Jun 26
ROE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROE
1.1%−2.4%−5.9%−9.5%−13%%−12%FY24FY25
1.1%−2.4%−5.9%−9.5%−13%%−12%FY24FY25

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+33.2%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+91.9%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
34.0%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

40.0/100 — rank 30 of 30 in Aerospace & Defense · 33% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. scores 40.0 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Aerospace & Defense, ranking 30. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 16.6 + 3.4 + 10 + 10 = 40. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. reported $7.8 B of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +91.9% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 2 years it has compounded at 34.0% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $18.7 B. The last four reported quarters add to $23.0 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $18.7 B (+33.2% on the year), capping 2 years at 34.0% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed $7.8 B, +91.9% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $18.7 B (+33.2% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 3-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
34.0% a year over 2 years
RevenueYoY growth
2035.0%1534.5%1034.0%5.033.6%0.033.1%$ B%$19B33.2%FY23FY24FY25
2035.0%1534.5%1034.0%5.033.6%0.033.1%$ B%$19B33.2%FY23FY24FY25
Jun 26: $7.8 B (+91.9% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
2nd straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
8.498%6.376%4.254%2.131%0.09.1%$ B%$8B91.9%Mar 25Sep 25Jun 26
8.498%6.376%4.254%2.131%0.09.1%$ B%$8B91.9%Mar 25Sep 25Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +53.6% growth against the decade's 34.0% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s operating margin is −1.8% in the Jun 26 quarter, +17.4 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −11.0% to 5.3%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −1.8%, +17.4 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −11.0%–5.3%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +17.4 pp year on year while gross margin went +11.3 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY25: −11.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 3-year window.
within a −11.0–5.3% band over 3 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
6.6%1.7%1.9%−3.1%−2.9%−7.9%−7.6%−13%−12%−18%%%−11%−16.3%FY23FY24FY25
6.6%1.7%1.9%−3.1%−2.9%−7.9%−7.6%−13%−12%−18%%%−11%−16.3%FY23FY24FY25
Jun 26: −1.8% operating margin (+17.4 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
4.9%22%−7.6%4.7%−20%−13%−33%−30%−45%−48%%%−1.8%17.4%Mar 25Sep 25Jun 26
4.9%22%−7.6%4.7%−20%−13%−33%−30%−45%−48%%%−1.8%17.4%Mar 25Sep 25Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. posted a net loss of $0.5 B in the Jun 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $4.9 B. That loss is 6.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $1.0 B.

Jun 26 profit was $−0.5 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−4.9 B (null).

FY25 profit $−4.9 B (null YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 3-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profit
0.4−1.0−2.5−3.9−5.3$ B$−5BFY23FY24FY25
0.4−1.0−2.5−3.9−5.3$ B$−5BFY23FY24FY25
Jun 26: $−0.5 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)
0.4−1.0−2.5−3.9−5.3$ B$−1BMar 25Sep 25Jun 26
0.4−1.0−2.5−3.9−5.3$ B$−1BMar 25Sep 25Jun 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY25 that was $6.8 B of operating cash against $−4.9 B of profit. After $20.9 B of capital spending, $−14.1 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

FY25: operating cash of $6.8 B against reported profit of $−4.9 B, leaving free cash of $−14.1 B after $20.9 B of capital spending.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $6.8 B vs profit $−4.9 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 3-year window, annual resolution.
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
8.52.4−3.7−9.7−16$ B$7B$−5B$−14BFY23FY24FY25
8.52.4−3.7−9.7−16$ B$7B$−5B$−14BFY23FY24FY25
Jun 26: operating cash $2.4 B Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 6 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)100%
3.5101.2%2.5100.6%1.4100.0%0.499.4%−0.798.8%$ B%$2BMar 25Sep 25Jun 26
3.5101.2%2.5100.6%1.4100.0%0.499.4%−0.798.8%$ B%$2BMar 25Sep 25Jun 26

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $36.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 64.3% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $36.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $20.9 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
2317115.60.0$ B$21BFY23FY24FY25
2317115.60.0$ B$21BFY23FY24FY25
Jun 26: capex $18.4 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 6 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
20−2.215−5.99.9−9.65.0−130.0−17$ B$ B$18B$−16BMar 25Sep 25Jun 26
20−2.215−5.99.9−9.65.0−130.0−17$ B$ B$18B$−16BMar 25Sep 25Jun 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. earns a ROE of −12% in FY25. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is −26.5% net margin on 0.20× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is −12%.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −26.5% net margin × 0.20× asset turns × 2.23× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −11.8% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

FY25: ROE −12% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line). 2-year window, dips included.
the full ladder
ROE
1.1%−2.4%−5.9%−9.5%−13%%−12%FY24FY25
1.1%−2.4%−5.9%−9.5%−13%%−12%FY24FY25
Dec 25: ROIC −2.5% (TTM) Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %. Last 4 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)
0.8%−2.1%−5.1%−8.1%−11%%−2.5%−10.2%Sep 24Dec 24Dec 25
0.8%−2.1%−5.1%−8.1%−11%%−2.5%−10.2%Sep 24Dec 24Dec 25
11 · Dividend

Dividend

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. pays no dividend. Across the last 6 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 6 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. carries total debt of $39.7 B against shareholder equity of $127 B as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.31. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.60 in FY24 to 0.59 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Jun 26: total debt of $39.7 B against shareholder equity of $127 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.31. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.60 (FY24) to 0.59 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY25: debt $24.4 B at 0.59× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 2-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
260.601×200.598×130.595×6.60.592×0.00.589×$ B×$24B0.59×FY24FY25
260.601×200.598×130.595×6.60.592×0.00.589×$ B×$24B0.59×FY24FY25
Jun 26: debt $39.7 B, debt-to-equity 0.31 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 7 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
430.8×320.6×210.5×110.4×0.00.3×$ B×$40B0.31×Sep 24Sep 25Jun 26
430.8×320.6×210.5×110.4×0.00.3×$ B×$40B0.31×Sep 24Sep 25Jun 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

9.1% of Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.6 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 9.1% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 1.6 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
9.1%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
1.6
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.: the Z-score reads 20.77. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 20.77 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 20.77.

15 · Related companies · Aerospace & Defense
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Lockheed Martin CorporationLMT 72.1/100Favorable setup81% evidence TURNING 25.8/35 Revenue 7.2% · PAT 49.5% · OPM change 8.3 pp 83% evidence 14.6/25 ROCE 6.8% · OPM 12.4% 76% evidence 16.1/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG 0.35 65% evidence 15.6/20 RS sector 5.3% · RS bench -9.6% · 1Y 12.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.8 + 14.6 + 16.1 + 15.6 = 72.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2RTX CorporationRTX 65.6/100Favorable setup81% evidence FADING 21.7/35 Revenue 11.8% · PAT 26.1% · OPM change 1.2 pp 83% evidence 15.3/25 ROCE 10.4% · OPM 12.7% 76% evidence 12.1/20 P/E 33× · PEG 1.33 65% evidence 16.5/20 RS sector 10% · RS bench -5.1% · 1Y 22.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 15.3 + 12.1 + 16.5 = 65.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Elbit Systems Ltd.ESLT 60.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 22.7/35 Revenue 13.7% · PAT 60.2% · OPM change 1.6 pp 83% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 9.6% 76% evidence 11.6/20 P/E 57.2× · PEG 1.13 65% evidence 15.0/20 RS sector 13.9% · RS bench -2.2% · 1Y 52.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.7 + 11.5 + 11.6 + 15 = 60.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Howmet Aerospace Inc.HWM 60.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 24.9/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT 33.9% · OPM change 2.5 pp 83% evidence 16.3/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 27.9% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 57.9× · PEG 1.62 65% evidence 10.3/20 RS sector 4.3% · RS bench -9.9% · 1Y 20.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.9 + 16.3 + 8.9 + 10.3 = 60.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5HEICO CorporationHEI 60.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 24.6/35 Revenue 18.8% · PAT 30.2% · OPM change 2.9 pp 83% evidence 14.4/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 25.5% 76% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 48.2× · PEG 1.56 65% evidence 11.1/20 RS sector -0.4% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y -6.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.6 + 14.4 + 10.3 + 11.1 = 60.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Embraer S.A.EMBJ 58.4/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence BREAKING OUT 16.6/35 Revenue 20% · PAT -22.2% · OPM change 1 pp 53% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 5.6% 57% evidence 14.1/20 P/E 54.9× · PEG 0.51 65% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 23.6% · RS bench 6.8% · 1Y 29.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 7.7 + 14.1 + 20 = 58.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 6.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
7General Dynamics CorporationGD 56.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 16.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.1 pp 45% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 10.4% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.9/20 RS sector 7.4% · RS bench -7.1% · 1Y 8.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.9 + 12.3 + 11 + 15.9 = 56.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8GE AerospaceGE 55.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 19.5/35 Revenue 21.7% · PAT 16.2% · OPM change -0.3 pp 83% evidence 16.4/25 ROCE 11.7% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence 7.2/20 P/E 43.5× · PEG 2.38 65% evidence 12.2/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench -8.3% · 1Y 4.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.5 + 16.4 + 7.2 + 12.2 = 55.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Hexcel CorporationHXL 54.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence FADING 20.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 39% evidence 10.6/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 11.5% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 50.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.7/20 RS sector 11.4% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y 42.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.8 + 10.6 + 9.9 + 12.7 = 54 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Curtiss-Wright CorporationCW 53.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 21.9/35 Revenue 10.5% · PAT 20% · OPM change 1.5 pp 83% evidence 19.6/25 ROCE 17.4% · OPM 19.4% 76% evidence 7.3/20 P/E 51.7× · PEG 2.28 65% evidence 4.5/20 RS sector -5.9% · RS bench -19% · 1Y 10.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.9 + 19.6 + 7.3 + 4.5 = 53.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Woodward, Inc.WWD 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 20.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 39% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 14.7% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 50.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.6/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench -12.5% · 1Y 35.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 14.1 + 9.8 + 8.6 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Leonardo DRS, Inc.DRS 49.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 20.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.7 pp 39% evidence 11.6/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 35.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.3/20 RS sector -3% · RS bench -16.5% · 1Y -10.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 11.6 + 10.7 + 7.3 = 49.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Textron Inc.TXT 45.6/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 15.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.8 pp 39% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 6.3% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 17.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.3/20 RS sector -3.4% · RS bench -16.8% · 1Y -4.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 9.1 + 11.3 + 9.3 = 45.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Northrop Grumman CorporationNOC 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BASING 10.3/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 14% · OPM change -3.7 pp 83% evidence 10.6/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 10.1% 76% evidence 14.5/20 P/E 16.2× · PEG 1.01 65% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector -5.4% · RS bench -18.8% · 1Y -8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.3 + 10.6 + 14.5 + 10.1 = 45.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
15The Boeing CompanyBA 44.0/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 19.9/35 Revenue 24.8% · PAT — · OPM change 1.4 pp 62% evidence 4.2/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 0.6% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 93.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.9/20 RS sector -2.3% · RS bench -15.8% · 1Y -8.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.9 + 4.2 + 9 + 10.9 = 44 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16CAE Inc.CAE 43.9/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence ASLEEP 10.8/35 Revenue 4.4% · PAT -22.4% · OPM change -7.6 pp 53% evidence 10.6/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 12.9% 57% evidence 14.7/20 P/E 37.3× · PEG 0.68 65% evidence 7.8/20 RS sector -7.6% · RS bench -20.5% · 1Y -15.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.8 + 10.6 + 14.7 + 7.8 = 43.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
17Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.HII 43.4/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BASING 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.9 pp 39% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 5% 76% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 16.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -12.8% · RS bench -25.3% · 1Y -0.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 9.1 + 11.4 + 6.4 = 43.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Axon Enterprise, Inc.AXON 43.0/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence FADING 20.0/35 Revenue 34.6% · PAT -39% · OPM change 5.4 pp 83% evidence 6.4/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 5.2% 76% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 232.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.0/20 RS sector -9.7% · RS bench -21.8% · 1Y -42.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 6.4 + 8.6 + 8 = 43 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19TransDigm Group IncorporatedTDG 42.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 15.5/35 Revenue 16.6% · PAT 10.3% · OPM change -1.6 pp 83% evidence 15.9/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 44.8% 76% evidence 5.3/20 P/E 40.2× · PEG 4.28 65% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -20.9% · 1Y -15.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.5 + 15.9 + 5.3 + 5.9 = 42.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20StandardAero, Inc.SARO 41.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 18.4/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.2 pp 53% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 8.8% 57% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 29.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -13% · RS bench -25.1% · 1Y -19.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 9.1 + 10.9 + 3.5 = 41.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21Rocket Lab CorporationRKLB 41.8/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence ASLEEP 25.2/35 Revenue 52.6% · PAT — · OPM change 16.7 pp 62% evidence 3.2/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -24.6% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.4/20 RS sector -7.4% · RS bench -20.2% · 1Y 35.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.2 + 3.2 + 10 + 3.4 = 41.8 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -7.4% and the one-year return is 35.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
22L3Harris Technologies, Inc.LHX 39.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.6 pp 45% evidence 10.0/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 11.1% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 96× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -13.5% · RS bench -25.8% · 1Y -12.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 10 + 8.9 + 3.5 = 39.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23FTAI Aviation Ltd.FTAI 39.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 12.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9.6 pp 39% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 20.5% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 58.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.7/20 RS sector -6.9% · RS bench -20.3% · 1Y 6.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 13.3 + 9.1 + 3.7 = 39 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24AeroVironment, Inc.AVAV 38.0/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence BASING 17.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -702.3% · OPM change 3.9 pp 83% evidence 6.1/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 8.9% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 97.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.6/20 RS sector -26.3% · RS bench -36.7% · 1Y -42.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.6 + 6.1 + 8.7 + 5.6 = 38 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.KTOS 37.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 18.4/35 Revenue 21.9% · PAT 50% · OPM change -0.9 pp 53% evidence 6.5/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 1.3% 57% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 423.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.4/20 RS sector -29.8% · RS bench -40.1% · 1Y -41.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 6.5 + 8.5 + 4.4 = 37.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26BWX Technologies, Inc.BWXT 34.4/100Adverse evidence66% evidence ASLEEP 16.7/35 Revenue 21.4% · PAT 19% · OPM change -1.8 pp 53% evidence 11.1/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 9.9% 57% evidence 5.2/20 P/E 54.7× · PEG 2.86 65% evidence 1.4/20 RS sector -17% · RS bench -28.7% · 1Y -15.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.7 + 11.1 + 5.2 + 1.4 = 34.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
27Moog Inc.MOG-B 52.9/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence FADING 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1 pp 32% evidence 12.9/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM 10.8% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 36.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y 84.3%9 of 11 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 19.5 + 12.9 + 10.5 + 10 = 52.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28DPC Holdings PLCDPC 46.9/100Thin evidence · provisional16% evidence 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 6% evidence 10.4/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 8.4% 57% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 10.4 + 10 + 10 = 46.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29Honeywell Aerospace Inc.HONA 42.9/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence ASLEEP 7.3/35 Revenue 10.1% · PAT -32.7% · OPM change -10.5 pp 83% evidence 15.6/25 ROCE 8.9% · OPM 12.8% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 1 week ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 7.3 + 15.6 + 10 + 10 = 42.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30Space Exploration Technologies Corp.this pageSPCX 40.0/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence ASLEEP 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17.2 pp 39% evidence 3.4/25 ROCE -1.6% · OPM -1.8% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 1 week ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 3.4 + 10 + 10 = 40 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s stock price today?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. trades at $153. The company is valued at $2,073 B. The stock sits at 58% of its 52-week range of $108–$185. — as of 19 September 2026.

What were Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s latest quarterly results?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. reported revenue of $7.8 B and a net loss of $0.5 B for the Jun 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $−0.09. The operating margin was −1.8%, 17.4 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 19 September 2026.

What is Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s revenue?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. reported revenue of $7.8 B in the Jun 26 quarter, +91.9% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $18.7 B (+33.2%). Over the last 2 years revenue compounded at 34.0% a year. — as of 19 September 2026.

What is Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s profit?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. earned $−0.5 B of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−4.9 B. The operating margin ran −1.8% in the latest quarter. — as of 19 September 2026.

What is Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s market cap?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s market capitalisation is $2,073 B at a stock price of $153. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 19 September 2026.

Does Space Exploration Technologies Corp. pay a dividend?

No — Space Exploration Technologies Corp. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 6 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 19 September 2026.

How is Space Exploration Technologies Corp. performing?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s latest readings are below. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 19 September 2026.

Will Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Space Exploration Technologies Corp. What it measures instead: the stock price is $153. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 19 September 2026.

Is the market betting against Space Exploration Technologies Corp.?

Somewhat — short interest is 9.1% of Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s tradable float, about 1.6 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 19 September 2026.

Does Space Exploration Technologies Corp. have too much debt?

It is moderate — Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s debt-to-equity is 0.31. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 19 September 2026.

What is Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s capex?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. spent $36.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $20.9 B. — as of 19 September 2026.

What is Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s cash flow?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. generated $6.8 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−14.1 B of free cash flow after $20.9 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−4.9 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 19 September 2026.

How financially safe is Space Exploration Technologies Corp.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 20.77 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 19 September 2026.

Where is Space Exploration Technologies Corp. in its business cycle?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s FY25 operating margin was −11.0%, against a 3-year band of −11.0%–5.3%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran −1.8%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 19 September 2026.

What could break the Space Exploration Technologies Corp. story?

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 19 September 2026.

Is Space Exploration Technologies Corp. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Space Exploration Technologies Corp.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 19 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-19. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI