HeartFlow, Inc.
HTFLHeartFlow, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is between stages. Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
HeartFlow, Inc. trades at $27.3, between stages. That is −6.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 39% of a 52-week range of $20 to $38. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (6 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is between stages. At $27.3 it trades −6.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 39% of its 52-week range ($20–$38).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.0 years the stock moved −12% while the S&P 500 moved +20% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-26) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
P/E does not price HeartFlow, Inc. — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. On sales the market values HeartFlow, Inc. at 11.1× its FY25 revenue of $0.2 B.
With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
HeartFlow, Inc. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 6 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +38.5% | — | — | — |
| Stock price | −12.5% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
39.7/100 — rank 21 of 29 in Health Information Services · 55% evidence confidence
HeartFlow, Inc. scores 39.7 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Health Information Services, ranking 21. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 20.1 + 4 + 10 + 5.6 = 39.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
HeartFlow, Inc. reported $0.1 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +25.0% year on year. That is the 5th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 2 years it has compounded at 41.4% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.2 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.2 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $0.2 B (+38.5% on the year), capping 2 years at 41.4% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.1 B, +25.0% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +47.9% growth against the decade's 41.4% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
HeartFlow, Inc.'s operating margin is −60.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −10.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −77.8% to −33.3%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is −60.0%, −10.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −77.8%–−33.3%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −10.0 pp year on year while gross margin went +5.0 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
HeartFlow, Inc. posted a net loss of $0.03 B in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.1 B. That loss is 60.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.03 B. 9 of the last 9 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $−0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.1 B (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
HeartFlow, Inc.'s cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY25 that was $−0.1 B of operating cash against $−0.1 B of profit. After $0.0 B of capital spending, $−0.1 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.
FY25: operating cash of $−0.1 B against reported profit of $−0.1 B, leaving free cash of $−0.1 B after $0.0 B of capital spending.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
HeartFlow, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
HeartFlow, Inc. earns a ROE of −40% in FY25. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is −66.7% net margin on 0.50× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is −40%.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −66.7% net margin × 0.50× asset turns × 1.20× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −40.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
Dividend
HeartFlow, Inc. pays no dividend. Across the last 9 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
HeartFlow, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 9 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
HeartFlow, Inc. carries total debt of $0.0 B against shareholder equity of $0.3 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.10 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from −16.00 in FY23 to 0.07 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of $0.0 B against shareholder equity of $0.3 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.10. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from −16.00 (FY23) to 0.07 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
8.9% of HeartFlow, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 2.7 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 8.9% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 2.7 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
HeartFlow, Inc.: the Z-score reads 22.30. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 22.30 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 22.30.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1HealthEquity, Inc.HQY | 67.9/100Favorable setup85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.6/35 Revenue 7.6% · PAT 89.3% · OPM change 3.9 pp 95% evidence | 15.5/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 29% 76% evidence | 12.4/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG 1.57 65% evidence | 16.4/20 RS sector 4.3% · RS bench 5.3% · 1Y 12.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 15.5 + 12.4 + 16.4 = 67.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Simulations Plus, Inc.SLP | 64.2/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | LEADER | 24.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 11.1 pp 45% evidence | 16.2/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 23.2% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 42.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 2.4% · RS bench 3.2% · 1Y 29.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 16.2 + 10.3 + 13.1 = 64.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Hinge Health, Inc.HNGE | 61.7/100Mixed-positive evidence62% evidence | LEADER | 19.9/35 Revenue 49.5% · PAT -1748.4% · OPM change 7 pp 83% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM 17.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.7/20 RS sector 35% · RS bench 35.8% · 1Y 40.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 15.1 + 10 + 16.7 = 61.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Veeva Systems Inc.VEEV | 61.5/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.5/35 Revenue 16.3% · PAT 20.5% · OPM change 0.1 pp 95% evidence | 17.7/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 30.9% 76% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 27.8× · PEG 1.47 65% evidence | 9.5/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench -13% · 1Y -24.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 17.7 + 13.8 + 9.5 = 61.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 510x Genomics, Inc.TXG | 56.9/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | LEADER | 20.1/35 Revenue 2.2% · PAT — · OPM change 14.1 pp 62% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -11.3% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 91.7% · RS bench 96.6% · 1Y 289.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 6.8 + 10 + 20 = 56.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.BTSG | 56.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 19.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.6 pp 45% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 44.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 27.5% · RS bench 31.3% · 1Y 202.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 12.7 + 10.1 + 13.7 = 56.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7HealthStream, Inc.HSTM | 55.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.0/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT 5.3% · OPM change 3.3 pp 83% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 9.3% 76% evidence | 5.6/20 P/E 30.9× · PEG 4.87 65% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 8.6% · RS bench 9.2% · 1Y 14.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 14.2 + 5.6 + 17 = 55.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Omada Health, Inc.OMDA | 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 25.2/35 Revenue 49% · PAT — · OPM change 9.2 pp 62% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE -2.9% · OPM -6.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector 1.2% · RS bench 0.6% · 1Y 6.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.2 + 7 + 10 + 11.4 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Phreesia, Inc.PHR | 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence67% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.7/35 Revenue 13.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8 pp 71% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 5.2% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 61.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -34.4% · RS bench -35.7% · 1Y -57.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.7 + 10.9 + 9.7 + 5.9 = 49.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Omnicell, Inc.OMCL | 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 9.7 pp 45% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 5.4% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 49.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -15.2% · RS bench -13.5% · 1Y 20.5%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 12.8 + 9.9 + 3.2 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11SOPHiA GENETICS SASOPH | 47.0/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.4/35 Revenue 19.1% · PAT — · OPM change 10.5 pp 62% evidence | 3.6/25 ROCE -15.1% · OPM -79.7% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 26.6% · RS bench 29.3% · 1Y 115.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 3.6 + 10 + 16 = 47 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Weave Communications, Inc.WEAV | 46.5/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.7/35 Revenue 16.4% · PAT — · OPM change 7.5 pp 62% evidence | 5.6/25 ROCE -5.1% · OPM -9.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.2/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench -2.2% · 1Y -9.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 5.6 + 10 + 9.2 = 46.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Waystar Holding Corp.WAY | 46.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 45% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 25.6% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 29.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -25.5% · RS bench -25.7% · 1Y -31.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 12.6 + 11 + 5.9 = 46.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14NRC HealthNRC | 45.7/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | FADING | 12.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9.6 pp 45% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM 16% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 86.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.6/20 RS sector 1.5% · RS bench 3.4% · 1Y 29.7%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.6 + 11.5 + 9 + 12.6 = 45.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15TruBridge, Inc.TBRG | 45.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | 10.9/35 Revenue 0% · PAT — · OPM change -5.9 pp 62% evidence | 10.0/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 3.5% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 73.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 5.2% · RS bench 11% · 1Y 18.9%8 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-10 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 10.9 + 10 + 9.2 + 15.2 = 45.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Carlsmed, Inc.CARL | 45.2/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.3/35 Revenue 75% · PAT — · OPM change -1.5 pp 62% evidence | 4.2/25 ROCE -11.7% · OPM -57.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.7/20 RS sector -2.3% · RS bench -1.5% · 1Y 5.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.3 + 4.2 + 10 + 9.7 = 45.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Privia Health Group, Inc.PRVA | 44.2/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.8/35 Revenue 24.7% · PAT 40% · OPM change 0.1 pp 83% evidence | 11.1/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 1.2% 76% evidence | 4.7/20 P/E 128.6× · PEG 3.86 65% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -10.3% · RS bench -9.2% · 1Y 15.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 11.1 + 4.7 + 5.6 = 44.2 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -10.3% and the one-year return is 15.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 18GoodRx Holdings, Inc.GDRX | 42.2/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 8.6/35 Revenue -1.3% · PAT -31% · OPM change -4.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.0/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 7.2% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 32.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.2/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench 1% · 1Y -3.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.6 + 11 + 10.4 + 12.2 = 42.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Doximity, Inc.DOCS | 40.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.6/35 Revenue 13% · PAT -11.7% · OPM change -18.1 pp 83% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 2.4% · OPM 17.1% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 23.8× · PEG 1.84 65% evidence | 1.9/20 RS sector -49.3% · RS bench -50.6% · 1Y -67.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 15.9 + 11.3 + 1.9 = 40.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Talkspace, Inc.TALK | 40.6/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.9/35 Revenue 22.7% · PAT -66.7% · OPM change -9.5 pp 62% evidence | 6.0/25 ROCE -6.2% · OPM -11.6% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 517.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 8.3% · RS bench 12% · 1Y 106%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 6 + 8.5 + 13.2 = 40.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 12%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 21HeartFlow, Inc.this pageHTFL | 39.7/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.1/35 Revenue 40.4% · PAT — · OPM change -9.1 pp 62% evidence | 4.0/25 ROCE -13.2% · OPM -56.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -18% · RS bench -17.4% · 1Y -12.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 4 + 10 + 5.6 = 39.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Schrödinger, Inc.SDGR | 37.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.8/35 Revenue 10.9% · PAT — · OPM change 2.2 pp 62% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE -9.4% · OPM -83.3% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 66.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -11.9% · RS bench -12.2% · 1Y -18.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.8 + 4.9 + 9.6 + 7.2 = 37.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23Tempus AI, Inc.TEM | 37.1/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.6 pp 45% evidence | 5.4/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM -24.3% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 2.7/20 RS sector -32.9% · RS bench -33.2% · 1Y -22.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 5.4 + 10 + 2.7 = 37.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Spok Holdings, Inc.SPOK | 36.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | BASING | 8.4/35 Revenue -1.4% · PAT -18.8% · OPM change -9.2 pp 83% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 7.4% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 18.2× · PEG 2.25 65% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -23.7% · RS bench -23.5% · 1Y -38.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.4 + 13 + 9.7 + 4.9 = 36 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Claritev CorporationCTEV | 36.0/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.1/35 Revenue 5.8% · PAT — · OPM change -3.1 pp 62% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 2.7% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -33.5% · RS bench -35.5% · 1Y -53.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 8.9 + 10 + 4 = 36 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Certara, Inc.CERT | 35.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.0/35 Revenue 6.8% · PAT — · OPM change -11.2 pp 62% evidence | 8.8/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM -4% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 174.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -14.8% · RS bench -15.5% · 1Y -28.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 8.8 + 8.7 + 6.1 = 35.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Evolent Health, Inc.EVH | 32.7/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.3/35 Revenue -21.3% · PAT — · OPM change -1.8 pp 62% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM -2.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -42.2% · RS bench -43.6% · 1Y -65.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 8.1 + 10 + 3.3 = 32.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28LifeMD, Inc.LFMD | 31.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.3/35 Revenue 36.9% · PAT — · OPM change -15.5 pp 62% evidence | 4.0/25 ROCE -53.7% · OPM -17.8% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 72.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -21.5% · RS bench -21.8% · 1Y -42.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.3 + 4 + 9.4 + 5.3 = 31 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Teladoc Health, Inc.TDOC | 41.9/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 9.1 pp 45% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE -1.9% · OPM -10.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -14.6% · RS bench -14.6% · 1Y -3.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 6.8 + 10 + 6.5 = 41.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is HeartFlow, Inc.'s stock price today?
HeartFlow, Inc. trades at $27.3, −12.5% over the past year. The company is valued at $2.0 B. The stock sits at 39% of its 52-week range of $20–$38, −6.3% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 6 weeks. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were HeartFlow, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?
HeartFlow, Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B and a net loss of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $−0.32. The operating margin was −60.0%, 10.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is HeartFlow, Inc.'s revenue?
HeartFlow, Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +25.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.2 B (+38.5%). Over the last 2 years revenue compounded at 41.4% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is HeartFlow, Inc.'s profit?
HeartFlow, Inc. earned $−0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.1 B. The operating margin ran −60.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is HeartFlow, Inc.'s market cap?
HeartFlow, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $2.0 B at a stock price of $27.3. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does HeartFlow, Inc. pay a dividend?
No — HeartFlow, Inc. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 9 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
How is HeartFlow, Inc. performing?
HeartFlow, Inc.'s latest readings are below. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 6 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is HeartFlow, Inc. beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view HeartFlow, Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-26), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.0 years the stock moved −12% against the S&P 500's +20% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will HeartFlow, Inc.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for HeartFlow, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $27.3. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against HeartFlow, Inc.?
Somewhat — short interest is 8.9% of HeartFlow, Inc.'s tradable float, about 2.7 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does HeartFlow, Inc. have too much debt?
No — HeartFlow, Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 0.09. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 5 August 2026.
What is HeartFlow, Inc.'s capex?
HeartFlow, Inc. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.0 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is HeartFlow, Inc.'s cash flow?
HeartFlow, Inc. generated $−0.1 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.1 B of free cash flow after $0.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.1 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is HeartFlow, Inc.?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 22.30 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is HeartFlow, Inc. in its business cycle?
HeartFlow, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was −33.3%, against a 3-year band of −77.8%–−33.3%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran −60.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the HeartFlow, Inc. story?
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is HeartFlow, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: HeartFlow, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.