Solar: Canadian Solar Inc. owns the largest revenue base; Tigo Energy, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
01 · the industry itself · before any single company
How has Solar moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 5% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 6% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat.
FADING · −1 in 4w✓Moving with the index3 of 10 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months
Solar, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Solar, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Solar, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 10 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Solar outperforming S&P 500?
Solar has outperformed S&P 500 by 32.9% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 20.5%. 1 of 10 covered companies currently beats the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +20.8%.
-20.5%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+32.9%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
1/10Stocks leading S&P 500
4/10Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Solar has outperformed S&P 500 by 32.9% over 52 weeks and 20.5% over 13 weeks. 1 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 10 beat the sector itself. Canadian Solar Inc. leads with revenue of $5,476 million, based on 6 of 10 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Companies
10
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$56.2B
First Solar, Inc.
Revenue growing
5/6
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
1/10
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 10
03 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
First Solar, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 55.5% evidence confidence.
Enphase Energy, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Exact sum: 13.5 + 9.9 + 9.2 + 5 = 37.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
04 · what price has already done
Market action
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Solar at +95.5%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +6.4%. 1 of 10 covered companies is above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Solar itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Canadian Solar Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 10 Solar companies compared here, at $5,476 million. Sunrun Inc. is next at $3,175 million. Tigo Energy, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 74.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Canadian Solar Inc. is the scale leader at $5,476 million, 72.5% ahead of Sunrun Inc.. Tigo Energy, Inc.'s growth is 74.6% from a $110 million base, with 16 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderCanadian Solar Inc. · $5,476 million
Gap72.5% versus #2 · Sunrun Inc.
Persistence1/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/10 companies · 164 observations
Investor read: Canadian Solar Inc. is the scale benchmark; Tigo Energy, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Canadian Solar Inc.'s growth falls below Tigo Energy, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
First Solar, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 10 Solar companies compared here, at 33.1%. Nextpower Inc. is next at 17.4%. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. has the highest Margin change at +29.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 9 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: First Solar, Inc. leads opm at 33.1%; SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. leads margin change at +29.1 percentage points.
LeaderFirst Solar, Inc. · 33.1%
Gap90.2% versus #2 · Nextpower Inc.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage9/10 companies · 159 observations
Investor read: First Solar, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 10 Solar companies compared here, at $34 million. Tigo Energy, Inc. is next at $4 million. 6 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. Its Net profit series carries 18 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. leads net profit at $34 million; the second comparison lacks enough current evidence.
LeaderShoals Technologies Group, Inc. · $34 million
Gap750% versus #2 · Tigo Energy, Inc.
Persistence1/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/10 companies · 167 observations
Investor read: Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Nextpower Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 10 Solar companies compared here, at 6.9%. First Solar, Inc. is next at 4.2%. Canadian Solar Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +1.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.
What the numbers say: Nextpower Inc. leads ROCE at 6.9%, 2.7 percentage points above First Solar, Inc.. Canadian Solar Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +1.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderNextpower Inc. · 6.9%
Gap64.3% versus #2 · First Solar, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage10/10 companies · 175 observations
Investor read: Nextpower Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 10 Solar companies compared here, at 1.27×. TOYO Co., Ltd. has the lowest P/E at 5.19×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.27×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderShoals Technologies Group, Inc. · 1.27×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/10 companies · 10 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
This Solar comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 7 of the 10 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
7 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 10 Solar companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Sep 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Solar company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Solar comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 10 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Solar sector outperforming S&P 500?
Solar has outperformed S&P 500 by 32.9% over 52 weeks and 20.5% over 13 weeks. 1 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 10 beat the sector itself.
Which Solar company is largest by revenue?
Canadian Solar Inc. leads with revenue of $5,476 million, based on 6 of 10 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Solar company is growing fastest?
Tigo Energy, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 74.6%, across 6 of 10 comparable companies.
Which Solar company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
First Solar, Inc. ranks first at 60.8/100 with 55.5% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Solar company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.27, among 1 of 10 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Solar comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Solar company is the biggest?
Canadian Solar Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $5,476 million, ahead of Sunrun Inc. at $3,175 million. That covers 6 of 10 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Solar company has the best profit margins?
First Solar, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 33.1%, from 9 of 10 comparable companies. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +29.1 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Solar company makes the most profit?
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. earns the most, at $34 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 6 of 10 comparable companies.
Which Solar company earns the highest return on capital?
Nextpower Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 6.9%, across 10 of 10 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Solar stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. screens cheapest at 1.27×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Solar sector beating the market?
Solar has outperformed S&P 500 by 32.9% over the last 52 weeks and 20.5% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 1 of 10 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Solar stock has the strongest price momentum?
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Solar company scores highest for research priority?
First Solar, Inc. scores 60.8 out of 100 with 55.5% evidence confidence, from 19.5 points on growth and earnings, 16.1 on capital efficiency, 10.8 on valuation and 14.4 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Solar companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 10 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Solar sector?
The 10 Solar companies on this page carry $56,211 million of combined market value. First Solar, Inc. is the largest at $26,183 million, about 47% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Solar sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 10 Solar companies on this page is 32.9×, measured on the 10 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Solar sector performing?
1 of the 10 covered Solar companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 32.9% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Solar stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 10 listed Solar companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.