Team Lease Services Ltd
TEAMLEASETeam Lease Services Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +28.4% in a year against a −32.6% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +28.4% against a −32.6% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.
The price is in a downtrend (90 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 0th percentile of its own 11-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +36.0% year on year, and 144% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Team Lease Services Ltd trades at ₹1,235, in a downtrend and 90 weeks into that stage. That is −16.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 18% of a 52-week range of ₹1,092 to ₹1,880. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (2 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 90 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹1,235 it trades −16.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 18% of its 52-week range (₹1,092–₹1,880).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +22% while the NIFTY 500 moved +282% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (2 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-17) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Team Lease Services Ltd trades at 13.5× P/E, about the cheapest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 46.9×, measured across 10.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 13.5× is about the cheapest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 46.9× measured over 10.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +28.4% against a −32.6% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the −21.9%/yr price move, ~+12.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−34.2 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +1.7%/yr price move, ~+19.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−17.3 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 6.8% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Team Lease Services Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — eps growth is rising at +29.3% while revenue growth is decelerating from its peak at +4.5% — the curves disagree, so the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 8 quarters across 4 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +5.7% | +14.4% | +19.3% | +16.8% |
| Profit | +28.2% | +8.0% | +12.6% | +18.9% |
| EPS | +28.4% | +8.6% | +12.9% | +19.1% |
| Share price | −32.6% | −18.9% | −21.9% | +1.7% |
4-Factor Sector Score
52.7/100 — rank 4 of 8 in Services - Others · 82% evidence confidence
Team Lease Services Ltd scores 52.7 out of 100 against the 8 companies it is compared with in Services - Others, ranking 4. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 21.7 + 9.8 + 14.9 + 6.3 = 52.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Team Lease Services Ltd reported ₹3,035 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +5.0% year on year. That is the 11th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 16.8% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹11,791 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹11,982 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹11,791 Cr (+5.7% on the year), capping 10 years at 16.8% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹3,035 Cr, +5.0% year on year — the 11th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +4.5% growth against the decade's 16.8% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +4.5% over the last 4 quarters against +11.0%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit +29.3% vs +19.0%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Team Lease Services Ltd's operating margin is 1.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, −0.1 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 1.0% to 2.2%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 1.0%, −0.1 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 1.0%–2.2%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +0.0 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Team Lease Services Ltd earned ₹34.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +36.0% year on year. It is the 6th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹141 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 18.9%. That is 1.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹25.0 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹34.0 Cr, +36.0% year on year — the 6th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹141 Cr (+28.2%), and the 10-year compound rate is 18.9%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +5.0% and the margin −0.1 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +29.8% vs revenue +4.5%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 144% of Team Lease Services Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹302 Cr of operating cash against ₹141 Cr of profit. After ₹64.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹238 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹302 Cr against reported profit of ₹141 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹238 Cr after ₹64.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 144% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 144%: the cash cycle held roughly steady between FY21 and FY26 — so conversion tracks profitability rather than the cycle.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Team Lease Services Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 17 days in FY26, down from 21 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹196 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹11,791 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹32.3 Cr, so roughly ₹549 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 17 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 17 days, tighter than FY21's 21.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹11,791 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹32.3 Cr — so the 17-day loop keeps roughly ₹549 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹196 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹163 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Team Lease Services Ltd earns a ROCE of 15% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 13% in FY24. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 1.2% net margin on 4.21× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 15%, recovered from a FY24 trough of 13% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 1.2% net margin × 4.21× asset turns × 2.68× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 13.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 6.8% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Team Lease Services Ltd carries ₹116 Cr of borrowings against ₹1,044 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.11. Operating profit covers the interest bill 11×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹23.0 Cr to ₹116 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹196 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY26: borrowings of ₹116 Cr against equity of ₹1,044 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.11. Operating profit covers the interest bill 11×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹23.0 Cr to ₹116 Cr while capital spending ran ₹196 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.
The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 6.8% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Foreign institutions cut 21.8 points of Team Lease Services Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 7.0% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +16.0 points over the same window, to 47.8%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −21.8 points over 8 quarters to 7.0%; Domestic institutions: +16.0 points over 8 quarters to 47.8%; Promoters: −0.5 points over 8 quarters to 31.1%.
Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −21.8 points against domestic institutions +16.0 points over 8 quarters, with promoters −0.5 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Team Lease Services Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Kapston Services LtdKAPSTON | 65.3/100Favorable setup76% evidence | LEADER | 27.8/35 Revenue 20.4% · PAT 57.8% · OPM change 1.2 pp 83% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 6.2% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 51.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.3/20 RS sector 81.7% · RS bench 77.7% · 1Y 197.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.8 + 10.7 + 8.5 + 18.3 = 65.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2eMudhra LtdEMUDHRA | 57.5/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 25.3/35 Revenue 29.8% · PAT 25.8% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 15.7% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 33.4× · PEG 1.48 100% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -12.3% · RS bench -16.5% · 1Y -43.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.3 + 12.3 + 13.5 + 6.4 = 57.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -12.3% and the one-year return is -43.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 3BLS International Services LtdBLS | 55.0/100Mixed-positive evidence78% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.5/35 Revenue 36.7% · PAT 34.1% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence | 19.2/25 ROCE 29.3% · OPM 25% 76% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 14.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 1.8/20 RS sector -17% · RS bench -20.7% · 1Y -34.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 19.2 + 12.5 + 1.8 = 55 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Team Lease Services Ltdthis pageTEAMLEASE | 52.7/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.7/35 Revenue 4.5% · PAT 29.3% · OPM change -0.1 pp 95% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 15.4% · OPM 1% 76% evidence | 14.9/20 P/E 13.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -14.6% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -35.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 9.8 + 14.9 + 6.3 = 52.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Indegene LtdINDGN | 47.5/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | TURNING | 13.7/35 Revenue 30.4% · PAT -8% · OPM change -4 pp 100% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 8.3/20 P/E 29.8× · PEG 1.99 65% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector 2.3% · RS bench -1.8% · 1Y -7.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.7 + 15.2 + 8.3 + 10.3 = 47.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Ecos (India) Mobility & Hospitality LtdECOSMOBLTY | 45.2/100Mixed-negative evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.4/35 Revenue 23.6% · PAT -4.9% · OPM change -3 pp 83% evidence | 19.9/25 ROCE 30.3% · OPM 12% 95% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 14× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -34.5% · RS bench -28.6% · 1Y -58.6%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.4 + 19.9 + 10.9 + 3 = 45.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7PDS LtdPDSL | 44.7/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 9.9/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT -26.3% · OPM change -0.6 pp 83% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 12.5% · OPM 3.4% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 47× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.7/20 RS sector 13.8% · RS bench 9.4% · 1Y -1.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.9 + 7.2 + 8.9 + 18.7 = 44.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 9.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 8CMS Info Systems LtdCMSINFO | 40.6/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence | ASLEEP | 8.0/35 Revenue 2.6% · PAT -18.8% · OPM change -1 pp 88% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 17.6% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 14× · PEG 2.81 100% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -22.2% · 1Y -46%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8 + 15.8 + 10 + 6.8 = 40.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Team Lease Services Ltd's share price today?
Team Lease Services Ltd trades at ₹1,235, −32.6% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹2,071 Cr. The stock sits at 18% of its 52-week range of ₹1,092–₹1,880, −16.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 90 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were Team Lease Services Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Team Lease Services Ltd reported revenue of ₹3,035 Cr and net profit of ₹34.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 5.0% and profit rose 36.0% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹20.79. The operating margin was 1.0%, 0.1 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Team Lease Services Ltd's revenue?
Team Lease Services Ltd reported revenue of ₹3,035 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +5.0% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹11,791 Cr (+5.7%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 16.8% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Team Lease Services Ltd's profit?
Team Lease Services Ltd earned ₹34.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +36.0% year on year — the 6th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹141 Cr. The operating margin ran 1.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Team Lease Services Ltd's market cap?
Team Lease Services Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹2,071 Cr at a share price of ₹1,235. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Team Lease Services Ltd's P/E ratio?
Team Lease Services Ltd trades at a P/E of 13.5×, at the 0th percentile of its own 11-year range, against a long-run median of 46.9×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Team Lease Services Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Team Lease Services Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Team Lease Services Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Team Lease Services Ltd looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 13.5× has been cheaper only 0% of the time in 11 years (long-run median 46.9×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Team Lease Services Ltd growing?
Yes — Team Lease Services Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +5.0% year on year, profit +36.0%, and the margin −0.1 pp at 1.0%. The 10-year compound rates are 16.8% (revenue) and 18.9% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.
How is Team Lease Services Ltd performing?
Team Lease Services Ltd is in a downtrend, 90 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 5.0% and profit rose 36.0% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
What stage is Team Lease Services Ltd in?
Mixed — eps growth is rising at +29.3% while revenue growth is decelerating from its peak at +4.5% — the curves disagree, so the per-curve reads carry the story. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +4.5% latest, profit growth +29.3% latest, eps growth +29.3% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Team Lease Services Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 90 of stage 4), trading −16.3% versus its 200-day average and at 18% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Team Lease Services Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Team Lease Services Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (2 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-17), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +22% against the NIFTY 500's +282% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will Team Lease Services Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Team Lease Services Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹1,235, the price is in a downtrend 90 weeks in. Its P/E of 13.5× sits at the 0th percentile of its own 11-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns Team Lease Services Ltd?
Promoters hold 31.1% of Team Lease Services Ltd, foreign institutions 7.0%, domestic institutions 47.8% and the public 14.1% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions cut 21.8 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Team Lease Services Ltd have too much debt?
No — Team Lease Services Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.11, and operating profit covers the interest bill 11×. FY26 borrowings were ₹116 Cr against equity of ₹1,044 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Team Lease Services Ltd's capex?
Team Lease Services Ltd spent ₹196 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹64.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Team Lease Services Ltd's cash flow?
Team Lease Services Ltd generated ₹302 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹238 Cr of free cash flow after ₹64.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹141 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Team Lease Services Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 144% of Team Lease Services Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹302 Cr against reported profit of ₹141 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is Team Lease Services Ltd in its business cycle?
Team Lease Services Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 1.3%, against a 13-year band of 1.0%–2.2%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 1.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the Team Lease Services Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +28.4% against a −32.6% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Team Lease Services Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Team Lease Services Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +28.4% in a year against a −32.6% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.