Rolex Rings share price today

Rolex Rings Ltd's share price was ₹201.17 at the close on 6 November 2026. It has been rising for 24 weeks. That is 29.2% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹102 and ₹206, and at that close it sat 96% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Rolex Rings Ltd is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 15 weeks in a row.

Over the last 5.2 years the share price moved +75% while the NIFTY 500 moved +55%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Three changes stood out: best operating margin in 8 quarters, promoters raised their stake by 2 points in one quarter and highest quarterly profit in 15 quarters.

1. Best operating margin in 8 quarters

   Operating margin was 23% in the June 2026 quarter, against 21% a year earlier.

   Why: Margins rose because the company sold more valuable products and kept raw material and plant costs tight, even while production was held back.

   Next results: check whether freight cost reimbursement or pass-through protects the margin while ocean freight stays high.

   From the earnings call on 6 Aug 2026.

2. Promoters raised their stake by 2 points in one quarter

   From 52.2% to 54.2% in the September 2026 quarter.

3. Highest quarterly profit in 15 quarters

   Profit of ₹60 crore in the June 2026 quarter is the highest of the last 15 quarters.

   Why: Profit hit a record because a better product mix and tight cost control lifted the profit margin, even though production was held back.

   Next results: check whether output and auto component export orders keep growing as staff attendance settles.

   From the earnings call on 6 Aug 2026.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), Rolex Rings reported revenue of ₹389 crore, up 43.5% from ₹271 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹74.0 crore, up 68.2% from ₹44.0 crore.

Rolex Rings results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

The newest call in our records is from 6 August 2026, about April to June 2026; a call about these results is not in our records yet.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Rolex Rings closed at ₹201.17 on 6 November 2026, up 76.2% from ₹114.17 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and up 70.0% over five years. Its highest weekly close since August 2021 was ₹265.04 on 27 September 2024.

Rolex Rings share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices, adjusted for splits and bonuses so every price is on today’s share count. Each change is the move from that price to the 6 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

280 weekly closes from 13 August 2021 to 6 November 2026.

6 Nov 2026: Rolex Rings closed at ₹201.17, up 23.8% on the week and up 18.9% on the month. Results for July to September 2026: Revenue up 43.5% and profit up 68.2% on a year earlier.

Earlier

• 6 Aug 2026: Rolex Rings held its results call for April to June 2026. Management guided: FY27 revenue growth in the mid-teens.
• 17 Oct 2025: Share split: face value cut from ₹10 to ₹1 a share (ex-date).

Rolex Rings has paid no dividend on the NSE since its first NSE close in our records (13 August 2021), the start of the period we checked.

No. Rolex Rings Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 11 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 7 November 2026.

On the call for April to June 2026, held on 6 August 2026, Rolex Rings' management guided: FY27 revenue growth in the mid-teens.

“Although this is below our guided growth, our order book throughout the quarter was healthy, and the constraint we faced was not demand but execution.”Hiren Doshi, on the call for April to June 2026

What management guided

• FY28 revenue growth perhaps above the mid-teens, approaching 20%.
• FY27 core operating margin 21-22%, excluding other income; FY28 core margin 50 basis points above FY27.
• Capacity utilization approximately 70-72% by FY27 year-end.
• Annual capital spending ₹30-40 crore in each of FY27 and FY28.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for April to June 2026, 6 August 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

When Rolex Rings reports October to December 2026, these are the 4 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Q2 output and auto-component export ramps - check sustained labor normalization and customer programs converting into revenue.

Rolex Rings is on one of our India lists: Momentum stocks.

Rolex Rings Ltd earned ₹74.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, +68.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 2nd quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹141 Cr. Over 10 years profit has grown 18.9% a year on average. That is 19.0% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹44.0 Cr.

Why profit moved: revenue changed +43.5% on a year earlier and the margin moved +4.0 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +32.6% and revenue +15.3%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

Rolex Rings Ltd reported ₹389 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +43.5% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 4th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 10 years it has grown 6.7% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,144 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,274 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹1,144 Cr, −1.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +15.3% on average, against 6.7% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +15.1%, against +3.0% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +8.3%, against +6.7% a year (stabilising).

Rolex Rings Ltd's operating margin was 24.0% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 4.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 years it has been between 18.0% and 23.0%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +4.0 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +8.2 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 135% of Rolex Rings Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹190 Cr of operating cash against ₹141 Cr of profit. After ₹45.0 Cr of spending on assets, ₹145 Cr was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 135% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 12 days shorter between FY21 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner.

What to look at next: no single use of cash stands out. The next section checks both the cash tied up in daily operations and the spending on assets.

Rolex Rings Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 164 days in FY26, down from 176 days in FY21. It spent ₹159 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 70 days to pay, and stock sits for 155 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹1,144 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹3.1 Cr, so roughly ₹514 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 70 days to pay and stock sat for 155 days, about 5.1 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 164 days, shorter than FY21's 176.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 155 days. Customers pay about 70 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 61 days. Together that makes the 164-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹159 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹110 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building a little beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹39.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: neither the daily cycle nor new spending is soaking up the cash, so the picture is fairly clean.

Rolex Rings Ltd's P/E is 23.6×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 32% of the time. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 28.3×, over 5.2 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

The P/E here, and its history, use a profit figure that can leave out one-off items, so it can differ from a P/E worked out on the quarterly results. Those results' earnings per share for the four quarters to Sep 2026 add up to ₹6.77.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −18.9% while the price moved +76.2%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 5 years the price moved +11.2% a year; about +21.7% a year came from earnings growth and about −10.5 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Rolex Rings Ltd's business is getting better. Profit growth hit its low 8 quarters ago at −19.6% and has recovered to +8.3%, with ROCE steady at 20.0%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: a lasting rise from a low is what this page is built to show.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Rolex Rings Ltd earned a ROCE of 21% in FY26. That is up from a low of 15% in FY21. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 9.0 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 12.3% net margin and 0.83× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 12.3% net margin × 0.83× asset turnover × 1.13× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 11.5% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 21.0% − 12.0% = +9.0 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each rupee put back into the business creates more than a rupee of value.

The 21.0% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 17.9%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

Rolex Rings Ltd has total debt of ₹0.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,166 Cr as of Dec 2025, so its debt is 0.00× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.41 in FY22 to 0.01 in FY25. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Domestic institutions cut their stake in Rolex Rings Ltd by 6.1 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Domestic institutions now own 25.7% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −1.5 points over the same period, to 6.4%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Domestic institutions: −6.1 points over 8 quarters, to 25.7%; Foreign institutions: −1.5 points over 8 quarters, to 6.4%; Promoters: +0.9 points over 8 quarters, to 54.2%.

Why the owners changed: domestic institutions drove it (−6.1 points), together with foreign institutions (−1.5 points). They reduced their stake.

For Rolex Rings Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

65.2 out of 100, rank 2 of 8 in Bearings, with 100% of the evidence available.

Rolex Rings Ltd scores 65.2 out of 100 against the 8 companies it is compared with in Bearings, ranking 2. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 22.5 + 17.8 + 7.9 + 17 = 65.2. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Rolex Rings ranks 2 of 8 Bearings companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 65.2 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Bearings, all 8 compared on one page.

Rolex Rings is the 5th largest of 8 Bearings companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Timken India, SKF India (Industrial) and SKF India. Just below it: NRB Bearings, Harsha Engineers International and Menon Bearings.

Bearings companies close in size

2. Timken India Ltd ₹21,452 crore
3. SKF India (Industrial) Ltd ₹11,709 crore
4. SKF India Ltd ₹6,895 crore
5. Rolex Rings Ltd ₹5,403 crore
6. NRB Bearings Ltd ₹4,340 crore
7. Harsha Engineers International Ltd ₹4,271 crore
8. Menon Bearings Ltd ₹1,958 crore

All 8 Bearings companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

810. Man Industries (India) Ltd ₹5,443 crore · Steel - Tubes/Pipes
811. Lohia Corp Ltd ₹5,419 crore · Textile machinery
812. Rolex Rings Ltd ₹5,403 crore
813. L G Balakrishnan & Bros Ltd ₹5,388 crore · Auto Ancillaries - 2 Wheelers
814. Vadilal Industries Ltd ₹5,387 crore · FMCG - Dairy Products

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 6 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.