Restaurant Brands Asia share price today

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd's share price was ₹94.27 at the close on 5 November 2026. It has been rising for 18 weeks. That is 16.1% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹58 and ₹104, and at that close it sat 78% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 15 weeks in a row.

Over the last 5.9 years the share price moved −40% while the NIFTY 500 moved +95%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

5 points in one quarter and revenue up on a year earlier for 12 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare).

1. Foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 4 quarters in a row

   From 20.6% to 8.4% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

2. Promoters raised their stake by 32.5 points in one quarter

   From 9.2% to 41.7% in the September 2026 quarter.

3. Revenue up on a year earlier for 12 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare)

   In the September 2026 quarter revenue was ₹845 crore, +20.2% on a year earlier.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), Restaurant Brands Asia reported revenue of ₹845 crore, up 20.2% from ₹703 crore a year earlier, and a loss of ₹24.0 crore.

Restaurant Brands Asia results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

Restaurant Brands Asia's management discussed these results on a call held on 29 October 2026; what it said is further down this page.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Restaurant Brands Asia closed at ₹94.27 on 5 November 2026, up 43.0% from ₹65.93 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and down 41.8% over five years. Its highest weekly close since December 2020 was ₹180.90 on 24 December 2020.

Restaurant Brands Asia share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 5 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

312 weekly closes from 18 December 2020 to 5 November 2026.

5 Nov 2026: Restaurant Brands Asia closed at ₹94.27, up 7.4% on the week and up 3.5% on the month. 29 Oct 2026: Restaurant Brands Asia held its results call for July to September 2026. Management guided: 80-100 India restaurants per year on linear 6-8 quarter pipeline with payback discipline.

Earlier

• Results for July to September 2026: Revenue up 20.2% on a year earlier.

Restaurant Brands Asia has paid no dividend on the NSE since 1 April 2021, the start of the period we checked.

No. Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 6 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for July to September 2026, held on 29 October 2026, Restaurant Brands Asia's management guided: 80-100 India restaurants per year on linear 6-8 quarter pipeline with payback discipline.

“We will continue to improve, but you will now start seeing EBITDA hovering above 13% and, as you said, moving toward 15% through volume growth as we begin to build volumes.”Raj, on the call for July to September 2026

What management guided

• Restaurant operating profit above 13% toward 15% on Families-led volume with new stores dilutive near term.
• Gross margin recent dip to recede as chicken headwinds normalise with cluster and scale benefits building.
• Avengers pre-booking 30 Oct with all-store launch 3 Nov plus December kids and premium family products.
• Indonesia self-ordering kiosks complete by March with profitability alignment by end-November and January-March quarter; asset upgrades over next 6 months.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for July to September 2026, 29 October 2026.

When Restaurant Brands Asia reports October to December 2026, these are the 3 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Families traction through kids layer as volume lever - traffic versus ticket split and premium mix follow-through.

Restaurant Brands Asia is on one of our India lists: Penny stocks.

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd posted a net loss of ₹24.0 Cr in the Sep 2026 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹204 Cr. That loss is 2.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹63.0 Cr. 12 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd reported ₹845 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +20.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 12th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 5 years it has grown 23.0% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,823 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹3,090 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹2,823 Cr, +10.7% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +15.4% on average, against 23.0% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +15.6%, against +11.6% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating).

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd's operating margin was 13.0% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 3.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Its latest full-year margin is the highest it has ever reported. Across 6 years it has been between 2.5% and 12.0%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +2.9 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +2.0 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

When margins are at a record, every ratio built on profit looks better than usual, so watch whether they hold.

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd's cash-flow history is too short to judge how much of its profit turns into cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹303 Cr of operating cash against −₹204 Cr of profit. After ₹594 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹291 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 1.8× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was −111 days in FY26, up from −205 days in FY21. It spent ₹1,970 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 6 days to pay, and stock sits for 15 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹2,823 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹7.7 Cr, so roughly −₹859 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 6 days to pay and stock sat for 15 days, about 0.5 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of −111 days, longer than FY21's −205.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 15 days. Customers pay about 6 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 132 days. Together that makes the −111-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹1,970 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹1,116 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹41.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd has no P/E right now, because its earnings are negative. The revenue and margin sections are where a turn would show first. Measured against sales instead, the market values Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd at 2.4× its FY26 revenue of ₹2,823 Cr. The P/E comes back here once profit turns positive.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 9 quarters of 2 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd earned a ROCE of 0% in FY26. That is up from a low of −8% in FY22. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a −7.2% net margin and 0.83× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a −7.2% net margin × 0.83× asset turnover × 4.69× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ −28.0% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The quarterly return lines and the return-on-capital-used (ROIC) line, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 13% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd had ₹1,967 Cr of borrowings against ₹721 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 2.73× its equity. Its operating profit is 2 times its interest bill. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹901 Cr to ₹1,967 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹1,970 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

Part of the spending on assets is being paid for with borrowed money.

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 13% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Promoters raised their stake in Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd by 28.6 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Promoters now own 41.7% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −11.1 points over the same period, to 26.7%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Promoters: +28.6 points over 8 quarters, to 41.7%; Domestic institutions: −11.1 points over 8 quarters, to 26.7%; Foreign institutions: −9.1 points over 8 quarters, to 8.4%.

Why the owners changed: promoters drove it (+28.6 points), with the other side taken by domestic institutions (−11.1 points). They raised their stake step by step.

For Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

49.5 out of 100, rank 8 of 8 in Quick Service Restaurant - QSR, with 49% of the evidence available. It is provisional, so it is ranked below companies with full evidence.

Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd scores 49.5 out of 100 against the 8 companies it is compared with in Quick Service Restaurant - QSR, ranking 8. Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 23.4 + 4.1 + 10 + 12 = 49.5. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Restaurant Brands Asia ranks 8 of 8 Quick Service Restaurant - QSR companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 49.5 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Quick Service Restaurant - QSR, all 8 compared on one page.

Restaurant Brands Asia is the 4th largest of 8 Quick Service Restaurant - QSR companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Jubilant Foodworks, Devyani International and Westlife Foodworld. Just below it: Sapphire Foods India, United Foodbrands and Speciality Restaurants.

Quick Service Restaurant - QSR companies close in size

1. Jubilant Foodworks Ltd ₹27,839 crore
2. Devyani International Ltd ₹14,845 crore
3. Westlife Foodworld Ltd ₹10,053 crore
4. Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd ₹6,714 crore
5. Sapphire Foods India Ltd ₹6,397 crore
6. United Foodbrands Ltd ₹2,484 crore
7. Speciality Restaurants Ltd ₹652 crore

All 8 Quick Service Restaurant - QSR companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

729. Transport Corporation of India Ltd ₹6,745 crore · Logistics
730. Ceigall India Ltd ₹6,741 crore · Construction - Civil/Turnkey
731. Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd ₹6,714 crore
732. JK Paper Ltd ₹6,711 crore · Paper
733. Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd ₹6,709 crore · Telecom Services

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 5 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.