Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-11
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11

Jupiter Wagons Ltd

JWL
Railways

Jupiter Wagons Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −28.8% in a year against EPS −55.6% — the market is paying now for delivery later.

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −28.8% in a year while annual EPS moved −55.6% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.

The price is in a downtrend (85 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 69th percentile of its own 4-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −16.1% year on year, and 11% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.

Stage
Deteriorating
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
₹240
−28.8% 1Y
P/E
57.5×
69th pctile
of its own 4-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹671 Cr
+46.2% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹26.0 Cr
−16.1% YoY
Operating margin
10.0%
−3.0 pp YoY
ROCE
9%
FY26
ROIC
6.0%
vs WACC 12.0% → −6.0 pp
Cash conversion
11%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Jupiter Wagons Ltd trades at ₹240, in a downtrend and 85 weeks into that stage. That is −14.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 0% of a 52-week range of ₹240 to ₹348. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (16 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 85 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹240 it trades −14.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 0% of its 52-week range (₹240–₹348).

Sep 26: ₹240 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−14.5% versus the 200-day line, week 85 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4₹775₹611₹447₹283₹119₹240₹280Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Dec 25Sep 26
S2S4₹775₹611₹447₹283₹119₹240₹280Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (552 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 16Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +1,261% while the NIFTY 500 moved +267% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (16 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-12) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Jupiter Wagons Ltd trades at 57.5× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (69th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 47.6×, measured across 4.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 57.5× is mid-range by its own standards (69th percentile), against a long-run median of 47.6× measured over 4.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 57.5× vs a 47.6× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 4.3-year window; loss-period spikes above 85× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
mid-range by its own standards (69th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
90.6×₹9.968.8×₹7.447.0×₹5.025.2×₹2.53.4×₹0.0×57.50×₹4Jun 22Jul 23Aug 24Sep 25Sep 26
90.6×₹9.968.8×₹7.447.0×₹5.025.2×₹2.53.4×₹0.0×57.50×₹4Jun 22Aug 24Sep 26
PEG 3.16 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 10 quarters.
above 1.0, the multiple already banks the growth
PEGPEG = 1.0
4.1×3.1×2.1×1.2×0.2××3.16×Q3 FY24Q1 FY25Q3 FY25Q1 FY26Q4 FY26
4.1×3.1×2.1×1.2×0.2××3.16×Q3 FY24Q3 FY25Q4 FY26
P/E
57.5×
69th percentile of 4y
PEG
2.07
as reported

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −55.6% against a −28.8% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the −14.1%/yr price move, ~−1.5%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−12.6 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Deteriorating

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Jupiter Wagons Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −11.7% latest against +76.2% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 10.1%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −26.4% in FY26, profit −56.3% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
84%192%55%125%25%59%−4.9%−8.0%−35%−75%%%−26.4%−56.3%FY21FY23FY26
84%192%55%125%25%59%−4.9%−8.0%−35%−75%%%−26.4%−56.3%FY21FY23FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising, profit rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
84%192%55%125%25%59%−4.9%−8.3%−35%−75%%%−11.7%−49.8%−48.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
84%192%55%125%25%59%−4.9%−8.3%−35%−75%%%−11.7%−49.8%−48.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
48%38%28%18%7.3%%10.1%Sep 23Mar 24Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
48%38%28%18%7.3%%10.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
Revenue growth
Recovering
latest −11.7% · span −26.5% to +76.2%
Profit growth
Falling
latest −49.8% · span −56.6% to +173.6%
EPS growth
Falling
latest −48.7% · span −55.7% to +162.1%
ROCE
Falling
latest 10.1% · span 10.1%–45.6%

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−26.4%+12.1%+24.0%
Profit−56.3%+11.1%+25.7%
EPS−55.6%+8.6%−7.7%
Share price−28.8%−14.1%+46.0%+32.6%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+46.2%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
−16.1%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
24.0%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

24.4/100 — rank 9 of 9 in Railways · 94% evidence confidence

Jupiter Wagons Ltd scores 24.4 out of 100 against the 9 companies it is compared with in Railways, ranking 9. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 3.5 + 6.8 + 1.6 + 12.5 = 24.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Jupiter Wagons Ltd reported ₹671 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +46.2% year on year. Over 5 years it has compounded at 24.0% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,916 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹3,127 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,916 Cr (−26.4% on the year), capping 5 years at 24.0% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹671 Cr, +46.2% year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹2,916 Cr (−26.4% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 6-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
24.0% a year over 5 years
RevenueYoY growth
4.3k84%3.2k55%2.1k25%1.1k−4.9%0−35%₹ Cr%₹2,916−26.4%FY21FY23FY26
4.3k84%3.2k55%2.1k25%1.1k−4.9%0−35%₹ Cr%₹2,916−26.4%FY21FY23FY26
Jun 26: ₹671 Cr (+46.2% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
1.2k123%90377%60232%301−14%0−60%₹ Cr%₹67146.2%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
1.2k123%90377%60232%301−14%0−60%₹ Cr%₹67146.2%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −3.7% growth against the decade's 24.0% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −11.7% over the last 4 quarters against −8.9%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −49.8% vs −33.3%/yr — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Jupiter Wagons Ltd's operating margin is 10.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, −3.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 10.0% to 14.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 10.0%, −3.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 10.0%–14.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −3.2 pp year on year while gross margin went −8.7 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY26: 12.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 6-year window.
within a 10.0–14.0% band over 6 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
14%2.3%13%1.2%12%0.0%11%−1.2%9.7%−2.3%%%12%−2%FY21FY23FY26
14%2.3%13%1.2%12%0.0%11%−1.2%9.7%−2.3%%%12%−2%FY21FY23FY26
Jun 26: 10.0% operating margin (−3.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
16%3.6%15%1.5%13%−0.5%11%−2.5%9.5%−4.6%%%10%−3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
16%3.6%15%1.5%13%−0.5%11%−2.5%9.5%−4.6%%%10%−3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Jupiter Wagons Ltd earned ₹26.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −16.1% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹166 Cr. The 5-year compound rate is 25.7%. That is 3.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹31.0 Cr.

Jun 26 profit was ₹26.0 Cr, −16.1% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹166 Cr (−56.3%), and the 5-year compound rate is 25.7%.

FY26 profit ₹166 Cr (−56.3% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 6-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
25.7% a year over 5 years
Net profitYoY growth
410192%308125%20559%103−8.0%0−75%₹ Cr%₹166−56.3%FY21FY23FY26
410192%308125%20559%103−8.0%0−75%₹ Cr%₹166−56.3%FY21FY23FY26
Jun 26: ₹26.0 Cr (−16.1% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
113267%85175%5784%28−7.5%0−99%₹ Cr%₹26−16.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
113267%85175%5784%28−7.5%0−99%₹ Cr%₹26−16.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +46.2% and the margin −3.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −43.7% vs revenue −3.7%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 11% of Jupiter Wagons Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹9.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹166 Cr of profit. After ₹414 Cr of capital spending, ₹−405 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹9.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹166 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−405 Cr after ₹414 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 11% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹9.0 Cr vs profit ₹166 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 6-year window, annual resolution.
11% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
446208−31−269−507₹ Cr₹9₹166₹−405FY21FY23FY26
446208−31−269−507₹ Cr₹9₹166₹−405FY21FY23FY26
FY26: CFO = 5% of profit (three-year rate 11%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
137%98%60%22%−17%%5%FY21FY23FY26
137%98%60%22%−17%%5%FY21FY23FY26

🚨 Why conversion sits at 11%: the cash cycle stretched 136 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 136 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Jupiter Wagons Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 213 days in FY26, up from 77 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹1,043 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,916 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹8.0 Cr, so roughly ₹1,702 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 95 days, inventory at 188 days — roughly 6.2 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 213 days, looser than FY21's 77.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 188 days to sell; customers pay about 95 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 69 days — netting out to the 213-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,916 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹8.0 Cr — so the 213-day loop keeps roughly ₹1,702 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 213-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 6-year window.
+136 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
228173118627days213d188d95d69dFY21FY22FY23FY24FY26
228173118627days213d188d95d69dFY21FY23FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹1,043 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹149 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹266 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹414 Cr, work-in-progress ₹266 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
4563422281140₹ Cr₹414₹266FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
4563422281140₹ Cr₹414₹266FY22FY24FY26

The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Jupiter Wagons Ltd earns a ROCE of 9% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −6.0 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 5.7% net margin on 0.62× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 9%.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 5.7% net margin × 0.62× asset turns × 1.58× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 5.6% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 6.0% − 12.0% = a −6.0 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE 9% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the full ladder
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
33%26%19%12%4.6%%9%6.6%FY22FY24FY26
33%26%19%12%4.6%%9%6.6%FY22FY24FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE 8.8% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
36%26%17%7.9%−1.4%%8.8%2.5%Q1 FY24Q2 FY25Q4 FY26
36%26%17%7.9%−1.4%%8.8%2.5%Q1 FY24Q2 FY25Q4 FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Jupiter Wagons Ltd carries total debt of ₹996 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹2,987 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.33. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.20 in FY22 to 0.33 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹996 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹2,987 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.33. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.20 (FY22) to 0.33 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY26: debt ₹996 Cr at 0.33× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
1.1k0.37×8070.32×5380.27×2690.22×00.17×₹ Cr×₹9960.33×FY22FY24FY26
1.1k0.37×8070.32×5380.27×2690.22×00.17×₹ Cr×₹9960.33×FY22FY24FY26
Mar 26: debt ₹996 Cr, debt-to-equity 0.33 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
1.1k0.37×8070.32×5380.27×2690.22×00.17×₹ Cr×₹9960.33×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.1k0.37×8070.32×5380.27×2690.22×00.17×₹ Cr×₹9960.33×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters cut 1.8 points of Jupiter Wagons Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 68.3% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −0.7 points over the same window, to 3.5%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: −1.8 points over 8 quarters to 68.3%; Foreign institutions: −0.7 points over 8 quarters to 3.5%; Domestic institutions: −0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.8%.

🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−1.8 points), alongside foreign institutions (−0.7 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters −1.8 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
76%56%35%15%−4.8%%68.3%4.2%0.8%26.7%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
76%56%35%15%−4.8%%68.3%4.2%0.8%26.7%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Promoters cut 1.8 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
78%57%36%15%−5.5%%68.3%3.5%0.8%27.4%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
78%57%36%15%−5.5%%68.3%3.5%0.8%27.4%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Jupiter Wagons Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Railways
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Cosmic CRF Ltd543928 66.5/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence LEADER 23.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 48% evidence 13.2/25 ROCE 13.6% · OPM 10% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 25.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 27.5% · RS bench 23.6% · 1Y 4.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.7 + 13.2 + 9.6 + 20 = 66.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2Railtel Corporation of India LtdRAILTEL 65.5/100Favorable setup94% evidence BASING 21.2/35 Revenue 20.8% · PAT 9.2% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence 19.6/25 ROCE 22.8% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 14.8/20 P/E 22.5× · PEG 1.55 100% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench -18.4% · 1Y -24.6%2 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.2 + 19.6 + 14.8 + 9.9 = 65.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Oriental Rail Infrastructure LtdORIRAIL 51.7/100Mixed-positive evidence69% evidence 23.6/35 Revenue -0.7% · PAT 65.5% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence 11.6/25 ROCE 12% · OPM 15% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 17.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.4/20 RS sector -8.9% · RS bench -9.4% · 1Y -22.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.6 + 11.6 + 11.1 + 5.4 = 51.7 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -8.9% and the one-year return is -22.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
4Texmaco Rail & Engineering LtdTEXRAIL 49.0/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence TURNING 10.5/35 Revenue -14.3% · PAT -1.8% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM 8% 100% evidence 15.5/20 P/E 22.1× · PEG 0.81 65% evidence 14.1/20 RS sector 5.8% · RS bench 2.5% · 1Y -15%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.5 + 8.9 + 15.5 + 14.1 = 49 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 2.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
5Titagarh Rail Systems LtdTITAGARH 47.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 18.2/35 Revenue -10.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE 10.6% · OPM 12% 100% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 58.4× · PEG 1.69 100% evidence 12.2/20 RS sector 8.6% · RS bench 5.5% · 1Y 0.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.2 + 8.3 + 8.9 + 12.2 = 47.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Rites LtdRITES 47.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence BREAKING OUT 16.0/35 Revenue 11.3% · PAT 9% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence 18.9/25 ROCE 23% · OPM 22% 100% evidence 4.7/20 P/E 24.1× · PEG 3.7 100% evidence 8.0/20 RS sector -2.4% · RS bench -5.2% · 1Y -20.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16 + 18.9 + 4.7 + 8 = 47.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
7Indian Railway Finance Corporation LtdIRFC 45.6/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence BASING 17.3/35 Revenue 4.9% · PAT 7.8% · OPM change 0.2 pp 74% evidence 7.2/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 99.5% 100% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 14.7× · PEG 2.24 100% evidence 9.8/20 RS sector 8.2% · RS bench -22.3% · 1Y -34.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 7.2 + 11.3 + 9.8 = 45.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corporation LtdIRCTC 36.7/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence BASING 11.5/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 4% · OPM change -6 pp 100% evidence 19.4/25 ROCE 46.1% · OPM 28% 100% evidence 4.3/20 P/E 26.8× · PEG 3.88 65% evidence 1.5/20 RS sector -17.9% · RS bench -20.4% · 1Y -35.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.5 + 19.4 + 4.3 + 1.5 = 36.7 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
9Jupiter Wagons Ltdthis pageJWL 24.4/100Adverse evidence94% evidence ASLEEP 3.5/35 Revenue -11.7% · PAT -49.8% · OPM change -3 pp 100% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE 9.2% · OPM 10% 100% evidence 1.6/20 P/E 57.5× · PEG 3.78 100% evidence 12.5/20 RS sector 9.6% · RS bench -14.9% · 1Y -25.9%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 3.5 + 6.8 + 1.6 + 12.5 = 24.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Jupiter Wagons Ltd's share price today?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd trades at ₹240, −28.8% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹10,239 Cr. The stock sits at the very bottom of its 52-week range (₹240–₹348), −14.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 85 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.

What were Jupiter Wagons Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd reported revenue of ₹671 Cr and net profit of ₹26.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 46.2% and profit fell 16.1% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹0.66. The operating margin was 10.0%, 3.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Jupiter Wagons Ltd's revenue?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd reported revenue of ₹671 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +46.2% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹2,916 Cr (−26.4%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 24.0% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Jupiter Wagons Ltd's profit?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd earned ₹26.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −16.1% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹166 Cr. The operating margin ran 10.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Jupiter Wagons Ltd's market cap?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹10,239 Cr at a share price of ₹240. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Jupiter Wagons Ltd's P/E ratio?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd trades at a P/E of 57.5×, at the 69th percentile of its own 4-year range, against a long-run median of 47.6×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Jupiter Wagons Ltd pay a dividend?

Yes — Jupiter Wagons Ltd's dividend payout was 25% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in 4 of its last 6 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Jupiter Wagons Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Jupiter Wagons Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 57.5× sits at the 69th percentile of its 4-year range (long-run median 47.6×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Jupiter Wagons Ltd growing?

Not right now — Jupiter Wagons Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue +46.2% year on year, profit −16.1%, and the margin −3.0 pp at 10.0%. The 5-year compound rates are 24.0% (revenue) and 25.7% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 11 September 2026.

How is Jupiter Wagons Ltd performing?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd is in a downtrend, 85 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 46.2% and profit fell 16.1% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 16 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.

What stage is Jupiter Wagons Ltd in?

Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −11.7% latest against +76.2% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 10.1%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −11.7% latest, profit growth −49.8% latest, eps growth −48.7% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Jupiter Wagons Ltd in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 85 of stage 4), trading −14.5% versus its 200-day average and at the very bottom of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Jupiter Wagons Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Jupiter Wagons Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (16 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-12), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +1,261% against the NIFTY 500's +267% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.

Will Jupiter Wagons Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Jupiter Wagons Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹240, the price is in a downtrend 85 weeks in. Its P/E of 57.5× sits at the 69th percentile of its own 4-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.

Who owns Jupiter Wagons Ltd?

Promoters hold 68.3% of Jupiter Wagons Ltd, foreign institutions 3.5%, domestic institutions 0.8% and the public 27.4% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 1.8 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Jupiter Wagons Ltd have too much debt?

It is moderate — Jupiter Wagons Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.33, and operating profit covers the interest bill 5×. FY26 borrowings were ₹996 Cr against equity of ₹2,978 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Jupiter Wagons Ltd's capex?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd spent ₹1,043 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹414 Cr, with ₹266 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Jupiter Wagons Ltd's cash flow?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd generated ₹9.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−405 Cr of free cash flow after ₹414 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹166 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Jupiter Wagons Ltd's profit real cash?

Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, 11% of Jupiter Wagons Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹9.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹166 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into the working-capital cycle. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.

Where is Jupiter Wagons Ltd in its business cycle?

Jupiter Wagons Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 12.0%, against a 6-year band of 10.0%–14.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 10.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.

What could break the Jupiter Wagons Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −28.8% in a year while annual EPS moved −55.6% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Jupiter Wagons Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Jupiter Wagons Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −28.8% in a year against EPS −55.6% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI