Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-17
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Pre-Engineering Buildings Stocks in India

Pre-Engineering Buildings: Pennar Industries Ltd owns the largest revenue base; EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the fastest current growth.

The 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies listed in India are Interarch Building Solutions Ltd (₹2.9K Cr, the largest), EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd, Pennar Industries Ltd and 2 more. 0 of 4 covered companies beat NIFTY 500 on relative strength. Readings are as of 17 Sep 2026.

All 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings Stocks in India (Sep 2026) — ranked by 4-Factor score

  1. 1Interarch Building Solutions Ltd₹2.9K Cr67.6/100Favorable setup · strongest on ROCE and PEG
  2. 2EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd₹2.4K Cr61.0/100Mixed-positive evidence · strongest on PEG and revenue growth
  3. 3Pennar Industries Ltd₹2.4K Cr46.5/100Mixed-negative evidence · strongest on PEG and financial resilience
  4. 4M & B Engineering Ltd₹1.5K Cr43.7/100Mixed-negative evidence · strongest on ROCE and revenue growth
  5. 5Everest Industries Ltd₹647 Cr37.4/100Mixed-negative evidence · strongest on profit growth and margin improvement

Ranked by the 4-Factor Sector Score (growth & earnings 35, capital efficiency 25, valuation 20, relative strength 20). Prices as of 11 Sep 2026. Not investment advice.

01 · the index people search for

Nifty Pre-Engineering Buildings Index — Constituents & Performance

All 5 listed Indian Pre-Engineering Buildings companies are named here, largest first — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Pre-Engineering Buildings index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date. One large constituent cannot set the reading.

  1. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd₹2.9K Cr
  2. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd₹2.4K Cr
  3. Pennar Industries Ltd₹2.4K Cr
  4. M & B Engineering Ltd₹1.5K Cr
  5. Everest Industries Ltd₹647 Cr
02 · the sector itself · before any single company

How has Pre-Engineering Buildings moved against NIFTY 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 1% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 18% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 5 weeks running.

BREAKING OUT · ahead 5w✓Moving with the index2 of 5 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑5w · 2/5 >200d (+0) · 2/5 lead (+0) · EPS 4/5↑

200500100020262025202420232022 845303 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100114Jun 24Dec 24Jun 25Dec 25Jun 26Mar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · up 32.8% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 24.9% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 105, against 100 at the start · down 22.2% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · down 39.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · up 12.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 15.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · up 21.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 23.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · up 12.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · up 14.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two110No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
200500100020262025202420232022 845303 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100114Jun 24Jun 25Jun 26Mar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · up 32.8% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 24.9% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 105, against 100 at the start · down 22.2% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · down 39.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · up 12.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 15.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · up 21.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 23.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · up 12.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · up 14.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two110No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
Pre-Engineering Buildings, equal-weighted, based at 200 NIFTY 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 5 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

03 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Pre-Engineering Buildings outperforming NIFTY 500?

Pre-Engineering Buildings has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 9.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 6.4%. 0 of 4 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +19.6%.

+6.4%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
-9.7%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
0/4Stocks leading NIFTY 500
1/3Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Pre-Engineering Buildings has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 9.7% over 52 weeks and 6.4% over 13 weeks. 0 of 4 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 3 beat the sector itself. Pennar Industries Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,645 crore, based on 5 of 5 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
5
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹9.8K Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd
Revenue growing
4/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
0/4
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 5
04 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 84% evidence confidence.
Pennar Industries Ltd looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Interarch Building Solutions LtdINTERARCH 67.6/100Favorable setup84% evidence BASING 24.9/35 Revenue 29.1% · PAT 15.5% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 15.7/25 ROCE 23.7% · OPM 9% 100% evidence 15.0/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG 0.64 50% evidence 12.0/20 RS sector 19.6% · RS bench -11.4% · 1Y -18%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.9 + 15.7 + 15 + 12 = 67.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2EPack Prefab Technologies LtdEPACKPEB 61.0/100Mixed-positive evidence70% evidence FADING 21.8/35 Revenue 37.6% · PAT 51.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 21.7% · OPM 9% 100% evidence 15.0/20 P/E 25.5× · PEG 0.43 50% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y 23.8%9 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 21.8 + 14.2 + 15 + 10 = 61 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Pennar Industries LtdPENIND 46.5/100Mixed-negative evidence91% evidence TURNING 15.7/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 13.6% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 15.3% · OPM 11% 100% evidence 13.0/20 P/E 16.7× · PEG 0.91 85% evidence 4.2/20 RS sector -5.5% · RS bench -2.5% · 1Y -29%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.7 + 13.6 + 13 + 4.2 = 46.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
4M & B Engineering LtdMBEL 43.7/100Mixed-negative evidence62% evidence BASING 9.3/35 Revenue 20.9% · PAT 7.9% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence 16.9/25 ROCE 22.9% · OPM 11% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 0% evidence 7.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench -23.2% · 1Y -38.6%1 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 9.3 + 16.9 + 10 + 7.5 = 43.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Everest Industries LtdEVERESTIND 37.4/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.7/35 Revenue -20.6% · PAT 94.1% · OPM change 6.7 pp 95% evidence 3.7/25 ROCE -8.5% · OPM 10% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -10.1% · RS bench -11.3% · 1Y -38.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.7 + 3.7 + 10 + 6 = 37.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
05 · what price has already done

Market action

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Pre-Engineering Buildings at +23.8%. Pennar Industries Ltd leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at -2.5%. 0 of 4 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-09-11.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

06 · the story behind the numbers

Pre-Engineering Buildings — the story behind the numbers

This is the written read behind the Pre-Engineering Buildings figures above — what is actually happening in the sector, in words, with the evidence each claim rests on. It is dated 17 Apr 2026, so the words are older than the numbers. 3 themes are live here, 1 of them rated high severity.

The Pre-Engineering Buildings sector is in a defensive crouch. With collapsing revenues, operating losses of ₹32.99 crore, and mounting regulatory costs, constituents like EVERESTIND are forced to rely on asset sales to maintain liquidity. Until demand normalizes and commodity or geopolitical pressures ease, the sector remains highly vulnerable.

The Pre-Engineering Buildings sector is currently experiencing a sharp downturn, as evidenced by EVERESTIND's Q3 FY26 performance. The demand environment is WEAK. EVERESTIND reported a consolidated revenue of ₹282.95 crore, marking a 23.74% YoY decline. The bottom line was heavily impacted, with a net loss of ₹37.98 crore, a 145.35% YoY drop.

How old this read is: STALE — this read comes from our Pre-Engineering Buildings sector brief dated 17 Apr 2026, about 5 months ago. The page says so rather than dressing it up, and a fresh sector dive replaces it the day it runs.

What is live in this sector right now

Live themeSeverityEvidence on file
Implementation of new Labour Codes led to a one-time gratuity provision of ₹16.34 crore.Named for EVERESTINDhighPartially offset by ₹3.05 crore profit from Mumbai office sale.
Regional instability in the Middle East affects export growth strategy and UAE-based trading subsidiaries.Named for EVERESTINDmediumNo further detail is on file for this theme.
Heavy reliance on imported Chrysotile Asbestos Fiber and Wood Pulp makes the company vulnerable to price spikes.Named for EVERESTINDmediumNo further detail is on file for this theme.

Sources: our Pre-Engineering Buildings sector brief, 17 Apr 2026.

07 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Pennar Industries Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at ₹3,645 crore. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is next at ₹1,978 crore. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 37.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Pennar Industries Ltd is the scale leader at ₹3,645 crore, 84.3% ahead of Interarch Building Solutions Ltd. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd's growth is 37.6% from a ₹1,596 crore base, with 9 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderPennar Industries Ltd · ₹3,645 crore
Gap84.3% versus #2 · Interarch Building Solutions Ltd
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 66 observations

Investor read: Pennar Industries Ltd is the scale benchmark; EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Pennar Industries Ltd's growth falls below EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND₹3.6K Cr
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH₹2.0K Cr
3EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB₹1.6K Cr
4Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified₹1.4K Cr
5M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified₹1.3K Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB38%
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH29%
3M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified21%
4Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND9.1%
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified-21%
Revenue · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND₹870 Cr2.8%Jun 2026
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH₹460 Cr21%Jun 2026
Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified₹436 Cr-13%Jun 2026
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB₹366 Cr24%Jun 2026
M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified₹291 Cr22%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹269 Cr
₹268 Cr
₹266 Cr
₹331 Cr
₹295 Cr
₹434 Cr
₹325 Cr
₹471 Cr
₹366 Cr

Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
₹392 Cr
₹446 Cr
₹484 Cr
₹308 Cr
₹352 Cr
₹432 Cr
₹522 Cr
₹377 Cr
₹371 Cr
₹453 Cr
₹501 Cr
₹306 Cr
₹283 Cr
₹327 Cr
₹436 Cr

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹294 Cr
₹298 Cr
₹316 Cr
₹385 Cr
₹303 Cr
₹323 Cr
₹364 Cr
₹464 Cr
₹381 Cr
₹491 Cr
₹523 Cr
₹504 Cr
₹460 Cr

M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹140 Cr
₹207 Cr
₹328 Cr
₹314 Cr
₹238 Cr
₹307 Cr
₹352 Cr
₹364 Cr
₹291 Cr

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

₹552 Cr
₹533 Cr
₹693 Cr
₹700 Cr
₹834 Cr
₹692 Cr
₹668 Cr
₹749 Cr
₹814 Cr
₹745 Cr
₹823 Cr
₹733 Cr
₹748 Cr
₹840 Cr
₹906 Cr
₹846 Cr
₹907 Cr
₹943 Cr
₹925 Cr
₹870 Cr

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.7%
62%
22%
42%
24%

Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-10%
-3.1%
7.9%
22%
5.4%
4.9%
-4.0%
-19%
-24%
-28%
-13%

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.1%
8.4%
15%
21%
26%
52%
44%
8.6%
21%

M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
70%
48%
7.3%
16%
22%

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

—
—
—
43%
51%
30%
-3.6%
7.0%
-2.4%
7.7%
23%
-2.1%
-8.1%
13%
10%
15%
21%
12%
2.1%
2.8%
08 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

M & B Engineering Ltd has the highest OPM among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at 11%. Everest Industries Ltd has the highest Margin change at +6.7 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: M & B Engineering Ltd leads opm at 11%; Everest Industries Ltd leads margin change at +6.7 percentage points.

LeaderM & B Engineering Ltd · 11%
Gap0% versus #2 · Pennar Industries Ltd
Persistence2/5 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 71 observations

Investor read: M & B Engineering Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified11%
2Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND11%
3Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified10%
4EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB9.0%
5Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH9.0%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified+6.7 pp
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH+1.0 pp
3Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND+1.0 pp
4EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB−1.0 pp
5M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified−1.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND11%+1.0 ppJun 2026
M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified11%−1.0 ppJun 2026
Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified10%+6.7 ppJun 2026
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH9.0%+1.0 ppJun 2026
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB9.0%−1.0 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10%
10%
10%
11%
10%
12%
10%
10%
9.0%

Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified

3.3%
4.6%
2.3%
7.5%
1.8%
5.0%
2.0%
4.2%
-0.6%
2.2%
3.4%
5.0%
-0.5%
-1.5%
2.3%
3.3%
-2.9%
-7.0%
-8.0%
10%

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.0%
6.0%
9.0%
10%
9.0%
8.0%
10%
11%
8.0%
8.0%
10%
10%
9.0%

M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10%
19%
10%
13%
12%
11%
11%
10%
11%

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

7.3%
8.0%
7.3%
6.4%
5.5%
8.0%
10%
8.0%
9.0%
10%
8.0%
10%
10%
9.0%
10%
10%
9.0%
9.0%
11%
11%

Margin change · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.0 pp
+2.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp

Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified

−8.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−5.7 pp
−2.4 pp
−1.5 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
−3.3 pp
−2.4 pp
−2.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.1 pp
−3.7 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.7 pp
−2.4 pp
−5.5 pp
−10.3 pp
+6.7 pp

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.0 pp

M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+2.0 pp
−8.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−1.0 pp

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

−0.5 pp
0.0 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.8 pp
+0.0 pp
+2.7 pp
+1.6 pp
+3.5 pp
+2.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Pennar Industries Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at ₹142 crore. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is next at ₹134 crore. Everest Industries Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 94.1%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Pennar Industries Ltd leads with ₹142 crore of TTM profit, 6% above Interarch Building Solutions Ltd. Everest Industries Ltd shows 94.1% growth from a ₹1 crore net cash profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderPennar Industries Ltd · ₹142 crore
Gap6% versus #2 · Interarch Building Solutions Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 66 observations

Investor read: Pennar Industries Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND₹142 Cr
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH₹134 Cr
3M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified₹96 Cr
4EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB₹94 Cr
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified₹-1 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified94%
2EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB52%
3Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH16%
4Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND14%
5M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified7.9%
Net profit · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified₹102 Cr5,000%Jun 2026
Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND₹35 Cr9.4%Jun 2026
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH₹28 Cr0.0%Jun 2026
M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified₹22 Cr22%Jun 2026
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB₹18 Cr13%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹13 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹18 Cr

Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
₹5 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹-6 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹-12 Cr
₹-15 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹-18 Cr
₹-38 Cr
₹-47 Cr
₹102 Cr

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹19 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹28 Cr

M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹7 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹22 Cr

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

₹8 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹26 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹41 Cr
₹35 Cr

Profit growth · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
23%
107%
42%
50%
13%

Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-80%
-62%
-11%
—
-1,600%
60%
-88%
—
—
-688%
5,000%

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5.3%
40%
27%
30%
40%
52%
32%
-5.1%
0.0%

M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
157%
-8.3%
39%
-6.9%
22%

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

—
—
—
133%
113%
91%
41%
57%
29%
19%
21%
18%
23%
20%
24%
23%
19%
13%
14%
9.4%
10 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at 23.7%. M & B Engineering Ltd is next at 22.9%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +1.5 percentage points. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Interarch Building Solutions Ltd leads ROCE at 23.7%, 0.8 percentage points above M & B Engineering Ltd. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +1.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderInterarch Building Solutions Ltd · 23.7%
Gap3.5% versus #2 · M & B Engineering Ltd
Persistence4/6 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 52 observations

Investor read: Interarch Building Solutions Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH24%
2M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified23%
3EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB22%
4Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND15%
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified-8.5%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH+1.5 pp
2EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB−2.3 pp
3Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND−2.3 pp
4Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified−10.3 pp
5M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified−11.7 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified19%−11.7 ppJun 2026
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH18%+1.5 ppJun 2026
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB18%−2.3 ppJun 2026
Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND17%−2.3 ppJun 2026
Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified-11%−10.3 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15%
—
20%
22%
16%
25%
18%
—

Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified

12%
—
7.5%
—
6.0%
—
5.4%
—
2.2%
7.5%
1.3%
5.0%
1.7%
1.4%
-1.1%
-0.1%
-3.6%
-4.6%
-11%
—

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.8%
—
23%
26%
17%
25%
17%
26%
18%
25%
18%
—

M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
22%
31%
37%
20%
29%
19%
—

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

12%
—
13%
—
14%
—
17%
—
20%
25%
19%
25%
19%
25%
20%
25%
19%
24%
17%
—

ROCE change · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+1.8 pp
—
−2.3 pp
—

Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
−5.8 pp
—
−2.1 pp
—
−3.8 pp
—
−4.1 pp
—
−0.5 pp
−6.1 pp
−2.4 pp
−5.1 pp
−5.3 pp
−6.0 pp
−10.3 pp
—

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+6.8 pp
—
−6.7 pp
−0.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.5 pp
—

M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+7.4 pp
−11.7 pp
—

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

—
—
—
—
+1.7 pp
—
+3.2 pp
—
+6.4 pp
—
+2.8 pp
—
−1.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
0.0 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−2.3 pp
—
11 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at 0.43×. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is next at 0.64×. M & B Engineering Ltd has the lowest P/E at 14.9×, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.43×, 32.8% below Interarch Building Solutions Ltd. Only 3 of 5 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderEPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · 0.43×
Gap32.8% versus #2 · Interarch Building Solutions Ltd
Persistence0/3 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/5 companies · 20 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB0.4
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH0.6
3Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND0.9
P/Elowest P/E
1M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified14.9
2Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND16.7
3Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH21.2
4EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB25.5
Valuation · company comparison
3/5 level · 4/5 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND0.915.8Jun 2026
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH0.623.5Jun 2026
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB0.426.5Jun 2026
M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified—18.5Jun 2026
Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified—-49.4Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.2
0.4
—

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.7
3.0
2.3
1.8
0.7
1.0
0.5
0.6

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.9
0.7
0.9
1.2
0.9
1.3
1.2
1.0
0.9
—

P/E · reported quarter history

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30.2
14.3
26.5

Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified

12.4
17.7
22.6
18.3
24.6
32.7
33.5
34.7
52.5
90.7
83.2
152.2
123.2
149.3
128.6
-49.4
—
—
—
—

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
23.5
30.4
24.9
35.9
30.3
30.6
20.7
23.5

M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
21.8
22.9
12.7
18.5

Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND

14.3
14.2
11.7
11.7
12.0
13.6
14.2
13.9
18.2
18.9
19.2
23.1
22.4
25.0
22.6
26.1
25.4
20.6
13.8
15.8
12 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Pre-Engineering Buildings comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 5 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 2 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
13 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-09-11. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-11 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing3 cross-checked · 2 unverified · 0 withheld, of 5 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.

14 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Pre-Engineering Buildings company comparison FAQs

These 23 answers restate the Pre-Engineering Buildings comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 5 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-11. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Pre-Engineering Buildings sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

Pre-Engineering Buildings has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 9.7% over 52 weeks and 6.4% over 13 weeks. 0 of 4 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 3 beat the sector itself.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company is largest by revenue?

Pennar Industries Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,645 crore, based on 5 of 5 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company is growing fastest?

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 37.6%, across 5 of 5 comparable companies.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd ranks first at 67.6/100 with 84% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company has the lowest comparable PEG?

EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.43, among 3 of 5 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Pre-Engineering Buildings comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Is there a Nifty Pre-Engineering Buildings index?

NSE India maintains Nifty indices for several broad sector categories — Nifty Bank, Nifty IT, Nifty Pharma and others — but not for every sub-sector grouping on this site. Whether or not an official Nifty index covers Pre-Engineering Buildings, this page builds its own equal-weight basket of 5 listed Pre-Engineering Buildings companies — one company, one vote, regardless of market value — so no single large company dominates the reading. Figures are as of Jun 2026.

Which are the best Pre-Engineering Buildings stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Interarch Building Solutions Ltd places first among 5 listed Pre-Engineering Buildings companies, followed by EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Pre-Engineering Buildings stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 5 listed Pre-Engineering Buildings companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company is the biggest?

Pennar Industries Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹3,645 crore, ahead of Interarch Building Solutions Ltd at ₹1,978 crore. That covers 5 of 5 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company has the best profit margins?

M & B Engineering Ltd has the highest operating margin at 11%, from 5 of 5 comparable companies. Everest Industries Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +6.7 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company makes the most profit?

Pennar Industries Ltd earns the most, at ₹142 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 5 of 5 comparable companies. Everest Industries Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 94.1%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company earns the highest return on capital?

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 23.7%, across 5 of 5 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd screens cheapest at 0.43×. Only 3 of 5 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Pre-Engineering Buildings sector beating the market?

Pre-Engineering Buildings has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 9.7% over the last 52 weeks and 6.4% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 0 of 4 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings stock has the strongest price momentum?

Pennar Industries Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company scores highest for research priority?

Interarch Building Solutions Ltd scores 67.6 out of 100 with 84% evidence confidence, from 24.9 points on growth and earnings, 15.7 on capital efficiency, 15 on valuation and 12 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Pre-Engineering Buildings companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 5 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Pre-Engineering Buildings sector?

The 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies on this page carry ₹9,804 crore of combined market value. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is the largest at ₹2,906 crore, about 30% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-17.

How is the Pre-Engineering Buildings sector performing?

0 of the 4 covered Pre-Engineering Buildings companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 9.7% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-17.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

About

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI