Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
₹82 Cr
₹82 Cr
₹183 Cr
₹183 Cr
₹161 Cr
₹130 Cr
₹218 Cr
₹341 Cr
₹210 Cr
₹162 Cr
₹279 Cr
₹392 Cr
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Platform - Education Stocks in India
Platform - Education: Physicswallah Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Crizac Ltd has the fastest current growth.
01 · the index people search for
Nifty Platform - Education Index — Constituents & Performance
The Platform - Education companies below are the listed Indian Platform - Education universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Platform - Education index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Platform - Education outperforming NIFTY 500?
Platform - Education has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 44.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 6.6%. 0 of 1 covered company currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is broad. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
+6.6%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
-44.7%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
0/1Stocks leading NIFTY 500
0/0Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: 23.6 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Platform - Education has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 44.7% over 52 weeks and 6.6% over 13 weeks. 0 of 1 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 0 of 0 beat the sector itself. Physicswallah Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,899 crore, based on 3 of 3 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Companies
3
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹40.7K Cr
Physicswallah Ltd
Revenue growing
2/2
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
0/1
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 3 of 3
03 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Crizac Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 75% evidence confidence.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Crizac LtdCRIZAC | 77.5/100Favorable setup75% evidence | ASLEEP | 35.0/35 Revenue 22.7% · PAT 41.3% · OPM change 5 pp 100% evidence | 20.0/25 ROCE 52.3% · OPM 24% 100% evidence | 15.0/20 P/E 15.6× · PEG 0.32 50% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench -24.4% · 1Y -39.9%0 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 35 + 20 + 15 + 7.5 = 77.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research LtdJARO | 48.5/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence | TURNING | 7.0/35 Revenue 8.7% · PAT 3.9% · OPM change -9 pp 95% evidence | 21.5/25 ROCE 22.1% · OPM 29% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 23.7× · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7 + 21.5 + 10 + 10 = 48.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Physicswallah LtdPWL | 46.8/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence | TURNING | 23.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 41.1 pp 45% evidence | 3.5/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 3.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —10 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.3 + 3.5 + 10 + 10 = 46.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
04 · what price has already done
Market action
Crizac Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Platform - Education at -39.9%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at -24.4%. 0 of 1 covered company are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-31.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Platform - Education itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Physicswallah Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 3 Platform - Education companies compared here, at ₹3,899 crore. Crizac Ltd is next at ₹1,043 crore. Crizac Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 22.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Physicswallah Ltd is the scale leader at ₹3,899 crore, 273.8% ahead of Crizac Ltd. Crizac Ltd's growth is 22.7% from a ₹1,043 crore base, with 12 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderPhysicswallah Ltd · ₹3,899 crore
Gap273.8% versus #2 · Crizac Ltd
Persistence3/3 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/3 companies · 27 observations
Investor read: Physicswallah Ltd is the scale benchmark; Crizac Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Physicswallah Ltd's growth falls below Crizac Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
3/3 level · 2/3 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physicswallah Ltd PWL | ₹919 Cr | 51% | Mar 2026 |
| Crizac Ltd CRIZAC | ₹392 Cr | 15% | Mar 2026 |
| Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd JARO⚠ unverified | ₹73 Cr | -1.4% | Mar 2026 |
Full 16-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · JARO⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹61 Cr
₹74 Cr
₹43 Cr
₹74 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹80 Cr
₹60 Cr
₹73 Cr
Physicswallah Ltd · PWL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹832 Cr
₹810 Cr
₹610 Cr
₹847 Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹919 Cr
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
96%
59%
19%
86%
30%
25%
28%
15%
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · JARO⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.0%
8.1%
40%
-1.4%
Physicswallah Ltd · PWL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
26%
34%
51%
06 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd has the highest OPM among the 3 Platform - Education companies compared here, at 29%. Crizac Ltd is next at 24%. Physicswallah Ltd has the highest Margin change at +41.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 8 reported observations across the 16-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd leads opm at 29%; Physicswallah Ltd leads margin change at +41.1 percentage points.
LeaderJaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · 29%
Gap20.8% versus #2 · Crizac Ltd
Persistence1/4 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/3 companies · 27 observations
Investor read: Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
Margin changefastest expanders
Operating margin · company comparison
3/3 level · 3/3 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd JARO⚠ unverified | 29% | −9.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Crizac Ltd CRIZAC | 24% | +5.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Physicswallah Ltd PWL | 3.1% | +41.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 16-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
35%
23%
21%
21%
32%
25%
29%
19%
29%
39%
24%
24%
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · JARO⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
42%
40%
-2.8%
38%
23%
33%
17%
29%
Physicswallah Ltd · PWL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16%
23%
-38%
-9.0%
17%
22%
3.1%
Margin change · reported quarter history
Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
−3.4 pp
+2.2 pp
+8.1 pp
−1.9 pp
−3.0 pp
+14.0 pp
−5.0 pp
+5.0 pp
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · JARO⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
−19.0 pp
−7.0 pp
+19.8 pp
−9.0 pp
Physicswallah Ltd · PWL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+41.1 pp
07 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Crizac Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 3 Platform - Education companies compared here, at ₹219 crore. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd is next at ₹53 crore. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at 41.3%. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Crizac Ltd leads with ₹219 crore of TTM profit, 313.2% above Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd. Crizac Ltd shows 41.3% growth from a ₹219 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderCrizac Ltd · ₹219 crore
Gap313.2% versus #2 · Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/3 companies · 27 observations
Investor read: Crizac Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
3/3 level · 2/3 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crizac Ltd CRIZAC | ₹74 Cr | 48% | Mar 2026 |
| Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd JARO⚠ unverified | ₹21 Cr | 17% | Mar 2026 |
| Physicswallah Ltd PWL | ₹-69 Cr | 32% | Mar 2026 |
Full 16-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
₹44 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹42 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹43 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹74 Cr
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · JARO⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹17 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹-4 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹21 Cr
Physicswallah Ltd · PWL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹41 Cr
₹77 Cr
₹-289 Cr
₹-127 Cr
₹70 Cr
₹102 Cr
₹-69 Cr
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-4.6%
-55%
187%
233%
9.5%
140%
19%
48%
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · JARO⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-53%
-15%
—
17%
Physicswallah Ltd · PWL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
71%
32%
—
08 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
Crizac Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 3 Platform - Education companies compared here, at 52.3%. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd is next at 22.1%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +8.3 percentage points. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Crizac Ltd leads ROCE at 52.3%, 30.2 percentage points above Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd. Crizac Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +8.3 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderCrizac Ltd · 52.3%
Gap136.7% versus #2 · Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd
Persistence2/4 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/3 companies · 15 observations
Investor read: Crizac Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
ROCE changefastest improvers
Return on capital · company comparison
3/3 level · 3/3 change
Withheld from this chart: Physicswallah Ltd (PWL) — its two data sources disagree by up to 18% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crizac Ltd CRIZAC | 42% | +8.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd JARO⚠ unverified | 16% | −21.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 16-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
8.7%
17%
26%
37%
—
36%
—
33%
48%
34%
50%
42%
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · JARO⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
38%
31%
15%
18%
16%
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+18.5 pp
—
−3.3 pp
—
−2.2 pp
—
+8.3 pp
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · JARO⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
−21.6 pp
09 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Crizac Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 3 Platform - Education companies compared here, at 0.32×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 15.6×. 1 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026. PEG asks what price is being paid for growth; P/E keeps that answer anchored to the actual earnings multiple.
What the numbers say: Crizac Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.32×. Only 1 of 3 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderCrizac Ltd · 0.32×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/3 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/3 companies · 2 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
Valuation · company comparison
1/3 level · 2/3 change
Withheld from this chart: Physicswallah Ltd (PWL) — its two data sources disagree by up to 18% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crizac Ltd CRIZAC | 0.3 | 15.9 | Mar 2026 |
| Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd JARO⚠ unverified | — | 16.4 | Mar 2026 |
Full 16-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.7
0.3
P/E · reported quarter history
Crizac Ltd · CRIZAC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33.8
26.5
15.9
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · JARO⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
29.1
18.2
16.4
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Platform - Education comparison names 7 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 3 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 draws at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. 1 has second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 1 company draws at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; it is marked unverified wherever that figure appears.
- 1 company is missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 3 Platform - Education companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 16 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Mar 2026 and market data through 2026-07-31. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Mar 2026 · up to 16 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-31 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing1 cross-checked · 1 unverified · 1 withheld, of 3 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Platform - Education company comparison FAQs
These 23 answers restate the Platform - Education comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 3 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Mar 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-31. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Platform - Education sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
Platform - Education has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 44.7% over 52 weeks and 6.6% over 13 weeks. 0 of 1 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 0 of 0 beat the sector itself.
Which Platform - Education company is largest by revenue?
Physicswallah Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,899 crore, based on 3 of 3 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Platform - Education company is growing fastest?
Crizac Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 22.7%, across 2 of 3 comparable companies.
Which Platform - Education company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Crizac Ltd ranks first at 77.5/100 with 75% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Platform - Education company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Crizac Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.32, among 1 of 3 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Platform - Education comparison include?
The page compares up to 16 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Mar 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
What is the Nifty Platform - Education index?
The Nifty Platform - Education index tracks India's listed Platform - Education companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 3 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Platform - Education sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Mar 2026.
Which are the best Platform - Education stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Crizac Ltd places first among 3 listed Platform - Education companies, followed by Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Mar 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Platform - Education stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 3 listed Platform - Education companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Mar 2026.
Which Platform - Education company is the biggest?
Physicswallah Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹3,899 crore, ahead of Crizac Ltd at ₹1,043 crore. That covers 3 of 3 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Platform - Education company has the best profit margins?
Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd has the highest operating margin at 29%, from 3 of 3 comparable companies. Physicswallah Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +41.1 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Platform - Education company makes the most profit?
Crizac Ltd earns the most, at ₹219 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 3 of 3 comparable companies. Crizac Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 41.3%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Platform - Education company earns the highest return on capital?
Crizac Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 52.3%, across 3 of 3 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Platform - Education stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Crizac Ltd screens cheapest at 0.32×. Only 1 of 3 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Platform - Education sector beating the market?
Platform - Education has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 44.7% over the last 52 weeks and 6.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 0 of 1 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Platform - Education stock has the strongest price momentum?
Crizac Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Platform - Education company scores highest for research priority?
Crizac Ltd scores 77.5 out of 100 with 75% evidence confidence, from 35 points on growth and earnings, 20 on capital efficiency, 15 on valuation and 7.5 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Platform - Education companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 3 listed companies over up to 16 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Mar 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Platform - Education sector?
The 3 Platform - Education companies on this page carry ₹40,685 crore of combined market value. Physicswallah Ltd is the largest at ₹36,229 crore, about 89% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-05.
How is the Platform - Education sector performing?
0 of the 1 covered Platform - Education companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 44.7% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-05.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.