Crizac share price today

Crizac Ltd's share price was ₹157.02 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 51 weeks. That is 22.7% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹138 and ₹307, and at that close it sat 11% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Crizac Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 22 weeks running.

Over the last 1 year the share price moved −53% while the NIFTY 500 moved −7%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 19 June 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Two changes stood out: foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 4 quarters in a row and operating margin down 4 points on a year earlier.

1. Foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 4 quarters in a row

   From 3.7% to 1.2% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

2. Operating margin down 4 points on a year earlier

   35% in the September 2026 quarter, from 39%.

Crizac paid ₹8 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 5 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 5.09% at the ₹157.02 close on 4 November 2026. The last was an interim dividend of ₹8 a share, ex-date 4 February 2026. Next: ₹4 a share, ex-date 6 November 2026.

Crizac dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Yes. Crizac Ltd paid out 64% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 1 of its last 6 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), Crizac reported revenue of ₹103 crore, down 36.4% from ₹162 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹36.0 crore, down 25.0% from ₹48.0 crore.

Crizac results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

The newest call in our records is from 28 September 2026, about April to June 2026; a call about these results is not in our records yet.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Crizac closed at ₹157.02 on 4 November 2026, down 48.8% from ₹306.90 a year earlier (7 November 2025). Its highest weekly close since July 2025 was ₹366.95 on 5 September 2025.

Crizac share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

73 weekly closes from 11 July 2025 to 4 November 2026.

6 Nov 2026: Coming up: ex-date for an interim dividend of ₹4 a share. 4 Nov 2026: Crizac closed at ₹157.02, up 13.3% on the week and down 5.9% on the month.

Earlier

• Results for July to September 2026: Revenue down 36.4% and profit down 25.0% on a year earlier.
• 28 Sep 2026: Crizac held its results call for April to June 2026. Management guided: FY27 operating revenue broadly flat versus FY26, reflecting a consolidation and capability-building year.
• 4 Feb 2026: ex-date for an interim dividend of ₹8 a share.

On the call for April to June 2026, held on 28 September 2026, Crizac's management guided: FY27 operating revenue broadly flat versus FY26, reflecting a consolidation and capability-building year.

“We are ready to handle twice the number of applications that we process today, and we can very quickly increase our capacity to process all the students.”Prabhat Agrawal, on the call for April to June 2026

What management guided

• Following FY27's consolidation year, normal revenue growth of 20-25%; operating profit and profit described as derived from revenue delivery.
• Operating margin and profit margin to remain approximately at historically maintained levels.
• Each acquisition or diversification requires 1-1.5 years to streamline and generate actual revenue.
• Non-UK markets expected to grow exponentially once global turmoil eases; US contracts and relationships already in place.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for April to June 2026, 28 September 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

When Crizac reports October to December 2026, these are the 4 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Q2 operating performance versus the broadly flat FY27 framework - check whether deferred intakes recover through later cycles.

Crizac is on 2 of our India lists: 52 week high & low and Dividend stocks.

Crizac Ltd earned ₹36.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, −25.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹219 Cr. Over 5 years profit has grown 59.8% a year on average. That is 35.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹48.0 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹219 Cr (+41.3% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed −36.4% on a year earlier and the margin moved −4.0 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +10.4% and revenue +0.6%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

Crizac Ltd reported ₹103 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, −36.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 5 years it has grown 56.5% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,042 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹975 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY26 revenue was ₹1,042 Cr, +22.7% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +0.6% on average, against 56.5% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Crizac Ltd's operating margin was 35.0% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 4.0 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 years it has been between 23.0% and 34.0%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −4.5 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +0.0 points. So the drop came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales.

Over the last 3 years, 90% of Crizac Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹144 Cr of operating cash against ₹219 Cr of profit. After ₹54.0 Cr of spending on assets, ₹90.0 Cr was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 90% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 44 days shorter between FY21 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 2.1× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Crizac Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 84 days in FY26, down from 128 days in FY21. It spent ₹180 Cr on assets over the last 3 years.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹1,042 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹2.9 Cr, so roughly ₹240 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

Spending on assets: ₹180 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹86.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹0.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Crizac Ltd's P/E is 13.1×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 3% of the time. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 20.9×, over 1 year of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +41.3% while the price moved −48.8%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Crizac Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 7 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Crizac Ltd earned a ROCE of 52% in FY26. That is up from a low of 49% in FY25. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 27.8 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 21.0% net margin and 1.19× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 21.0% net margin × 1.19× asset turnover × 1.50× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 37.5% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 39.8% − 12.0% = +27.8 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each rupee put back into the business creates more than a rupee of value.

The 39.8% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 85.2%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

Crizac Ltd has total debt of ₹1.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹675 Cr as of Sep 2026, so its debt is 0.00× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.00 in FY24 to 0.00 in FY26. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Domestic institutions cut their stake in Crizac Ltd by 4.1 percentage points over 5 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Domestic institutions now own 2.9% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −1.8 points over the same period, to 1.2%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Domestic institutions: −4.1 points over 5 quarters, to 2.9%; Foreign institutions: −1.8 points over 5 quarters, to 1.2%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 5 quarters, to 79.9%.

Why the owners changed: domestic institutions drove it (−4.1 points), together with foreign institutions (−1.8 points). They reduced their stake.

For Crizac Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

57.4 out of 100, rank 1 of 3 in Platform - Education, with 75% of the evidence available.

Crizac Ltd scores 57.4 out of 100 against the 3 companies it is compared with in Platform - Education, ranking 1. The valuation scores well, but earnings are not improving yet, so the business does not back up the low multiple so far.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 12.9 + 22 + 15 + 7.5 = 57.4. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Crizac ranks 1 of 3 Platform - Education companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 57.4 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Platform - Education, all 3 compared on one page.

Crizac is the 2nd largest of 3 Platform - Education companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Physicswallah. Just below it: Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research.

Platform - Education companies close in size

1. Physicswallah Ltd ₹37,519 crore
2. Crizac Ltd ₹2,425 crore
3. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd ₹726 crore

All 3 Platform - Education companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1142. Kabra Extrusion Technik Ltd ₹2,431 crore · Capital Goods - Engineering Heavy
1143. Flair Writing Industries Ltd ₹2,430 crore · Printing & Stationery
1144. Crizac Ltd ₹2,425 crore
1145. Rishabh Instruments Ltd ₹2,424 crore · Capital Goods - Electric General
1146. KMC Speciality Hospitals (India) Ltd ₹2,420 crore · Hospitals

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.