# Platform - Education — company-by-company sector analysis > Platform - Education: Physicswallah Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Crizac Ltd has the fastest current growth. Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers. Data as of 2026-08-05. Not investment advice. ## Bottom line Platform - Education has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 44.7% over 52 weeks and 6.6% over 13 weeks. 0 of 1 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 0 of 0 beat the sector itself. Physicswallah Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,899 crore, based on 3 of 3 comparable companies through Mar 2026. ## Sector relative strength Platform - Education has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 44.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 6.6%. 0 of 1 covered company currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is broad. Readings are as of 2026-07-19. 13-week sector return versus NIFTY 500: 6.6% 52-week sector return versus NIFTY 500: -45% Stocks leading NIFTY: 0/1 Stocks leading sector: 0/0 Central tension: The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change. Companies: 3 Combined market value: ₹40.7K Cr ## 4-Factor Sector Score An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment. 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): 78/100 — Favorable setup; evidence 75% - Growth & earnings 35.0/35 | Capital efficiency 20.0/25 | Valuation 15.0/20 | Relative strength 7.5/20 - Price stage: ASLEEP — Neither ahead of the benchmark nor yet turning up against it. - Led NIFTY 500 by 5%+ over the prior 13 weeks in 0 of 10 weeks with a reading, within the last 12 - Exact sum: 35 + 20 + 15 + 7.5 = 77.5 - Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. 2. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): 49/100 — Thin evidence · provisional; evidence 57% - Growth & earnings 7.0/35 | Capital efficiency 21.5/25 | Valuation 10.0/20 | Relative strength 10.0/20 - Price stage: TURNING — Ahead of the benchmark for one to four weeks, after a stretch of being behind. - Led NIFTY 500 by 5%+ over the prior 13 weeks in 8 of 10 weeks with a reading, within the last 12 - Exact sum: 7 + 21.5 + 10 + 10 = 48.5 - Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. 3. Physicswallah Ltd (PWL): 47/100 — Thin evidence · provisional; evidence 35% - Growth & earnings 23.3/35 | Capital efficiency 3.5/25 | Valuation 10.0/20 | Relative strength 10.0/20 - Price stage: TURNING — Ahead of the benchmark for one to four weeks, after a stretch of being behind. - Led NIFTY 500 by 5%+ over the prior 13 weeks in 10 of 10 weeks with a reading, within the last 12 - Exact sum: 23.3 + 3.5 + 10 + 10 = 46.8 - Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. ## Market action Crizac Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Platform - Education at -39.9%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at -24.4%. 0 of 1 covered company are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-31. ### Strongest one-year price performers 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): -40% ### Strongest relative strength versus NIFTY 500 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): -24% ## Revenue Scale & Growth Durability What the numbers say: Physicswallah Ltd is the scale leader at ₹3,899 crore, 273.8% ahead of Crizac Ltd. Crizac Ltd's growth is 22.7% from a ₹1,043 crore base, with 12 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale. Investor read: Physicswallah Ltd is the scale benchmark; Crizac Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns. This conclusion weakens if: Physicswallah Ltd's growth falls below Crizac Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses. Evidence: Physicswallah Ltd · ₹3,899 crore | 273.8% versus #2 · Crizac Ltd | 3/3 recent comparable periods | 3/3 companies · 27 observations Definition: Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress. ### Revenue — largest 1. Physicswallah Ltd (PWL): ₹3.9K Cr 2. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): ₹1.0K Cr 3. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): ₹274 Cr ### Revenue growth — fastest growers 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): 23% 2. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): 8.7% ### 16-quarter Revenue history - PWL: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 ₹832 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹810 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹610 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹847 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹1.1K Cr | Dec 2025 ₹1.1K Cr | Mar 2026 ₹919 Cr - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 ₹82 Cr | Sep 2023 ₹82 Cr | Dec 2023 ₹183 Cr | Mar 2024 ₹183 Cr | Jun 2024 ₹161 Cr | Sep 2024 ₹130 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹218 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹341 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹210 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹162 Cr | Dec 2025 ₹279 Cr | Mar 2026 ₹392 Cr - JARO: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 ₹61 Cr | Sep 2024 ₹74 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹43 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹74 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹61 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹80 Cr | Dec 2025 ₹60 Cr | Mar 2026 ₹73 Cr ### 16-quarter Revenue growth history - PWL: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 — | Sep 2025 26% | Dec 2025 34% | Mar 2026 51% - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 96% | Sep 2024 59% | Dec 2024 19% | Mar 2025 86% | Jun 2025 30% | Sep 2025 25% | Dec 2025 28% | Mar 2026 15% - JARO: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 0.0% | Sep 2025 8.1% | Dec 2025 40% | Mar 2026 -1.4% ## Operating Economics & Margin Trend What the numbers say: Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd leads opm at 29%; Physicswallah Ltd leads margin change at +41.1 percentage points. Investor read: Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it. This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal. Evidence: Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd · 29% | 20.8% versus #2 · Crizac Ltd | 1/4 recent comparable periods | 3/3 companies · 27 observations Definition: Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth. ### OPM — highest 1. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): 29% 2. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): 24% 3. Physicswallah Ltd (PWL): 3.1% ### Margin change — fastest expanders 1. Physicswallah Ltd (PWL): +41.1 pp 2. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): +5.0 pp 3. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): −9.0 pp ### 16-quarter OPM history - PWL: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 16% | Dec 2024 23% | Mar 2025 -38% | Jun 2025 -9.0% | Sep 2025 17% | Dec 2025 22% | Mar 2026 3.1% - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 35% | Sep 2023 23% | Dec 2023 21% | Mar 2024 21% | Jun 2024 32% | Sep 2024 25% | Dec 2024 29% | Mar 2025 19% | Jun 2025 29% | Sep 2025 39% | Dec 2025 24% | Mar 2026 24% - JARO: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 42% | Sep 2024 40% | Dec 2024 -2.8% | Mar 2025 38% | Jun 2025 23% | Sep 2025 33% | Dec 2025 17% | Mar 2026 29% ### 16-quarter Margin change history - PWL: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 — | Sep 2025 +1.0 pp | Dec 2025 −1.0 pp | Mar 2026 +41.1 pp - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 −3.4 pp | Sep 2024 +2.2 pp | Dec 2024 +8.1 pp | Mar 2025 −1.9 pp | Jun 2025 −3.0 pp | Sep 2025 +14.0 pp | Dec 2025 −5.0 pp | Mar 2026 +5.0 pp - JARO: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 −19.0 pp | Sep 2025 −7.0 pp | Dec 2025 +19.8 pp | Mar 2026 −9.0 pp ## Profit Scale & Acceleration What the numbers say: Crizac Ltd leads with ₹219 crore of TTM profit, 313.2% above Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd. Crizac Ltd shows 41.3% growth from a ₹219 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale. Investor read: Crizac Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it. This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal. Evidence: Crizac Ltd · ₹219 crore | 313.2% versus #2 · Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd | 6/8 recent comparable periods | 3/3 companies · 27 observations Definition: Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank. ### Net profit — largest 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): ₹219 Cr 2. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): ₹53 Cr 3. Physicswallah Ltd (PWL): ₹-24 Cr ### Profit growth — fastest growers 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): 41% 2. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): 3.9% ### 16-quarter Net profit history - PWL: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 ₹41 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹77 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹-289 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹-127 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹70 Cr | Dec 2025 ₹102 Cr | Mar 2026 ₹-69 Cr - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 ₹44 Cr | Sep 2023 ₹44 Cr | Dec 2023 ₹15 Cr | Mar 2024 ₹15 Cr | Jun 2024 ₹42 Cr | Sep 2024 ₹20 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹43 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹50 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹46 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹48 Cr | Dec 2025 ₹51 Cr | Mar 2026 ₹74 Cr - JARO: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 ₹17 Cr | Sep 2024 ₹20 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹-4 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹18 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹8 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹17 Cr | Dec 2025 ₹7 Cr | Mar 2026 ₹21 Cr ### 16-quarter Profit growth history - PWL: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 — | Sep 2025 71% | Dec 2025 32% | Mar 2026 — - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 -4.6% | Sep 2024 -55% | Dec 2024 187% | Mar 2025 233% | Jun 2025 9.5% | Sep 2025 140% | Dec 2025 19% | Mar 2026 48% - JARO: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 -53% | Sep 2025 -15% | Dec 2025 — | Mar 2026 17% ## Return On Capital Employed What the numbers say: Crizac Ltd leads ROCE at 52.3%, 30.2 percentage points above Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd. Crizac Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +8.3 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability. Investor read: Crizac Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it. This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal. Evidence: Crizac Ltd · 52.3% | 136.7% versus #2 · Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd | 2/4 recent comparable periods | 3/3 companies · 15 observations Definition: ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability. ### ROCE — highest 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): 52% 2. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): 22% 3. Physicswallah Ltd (PWL): 4.0% ### ROCE change — fastest improvers 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): +8.3 pp 2. Physicswallah Ltd (PWL): +7.0 pp 3. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): −21.6 pp ### 16-quarter ROCE history - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 8.7% | Sep 2023 17% | Dec 2023 26% | Mar 2024 37% | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 36% | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 33% | Jun 2025 48% | Sep 2025 34% | Dec 2025 50% | Mar 2026 42% - JARO: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 38% | Jun 2025 31% | Sep 2025 15% | Dec 2025 18% | Mar 2026 16% ### 16-quarter ROCE change history - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 +18.5 pp | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 −3.3 pp | Jun 2025 — | Sep 2025 −2.2 pp | Dec 2025 — | Mar 2026 +8.3 pp - JARO: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 — | Sep 2025 — | Dec 2025 — | Mar 2026 −21.6 pp ## Valuation Against Growth & Quality What the numbers say: Crizac Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.32×. Only 1 of 3 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree. Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy. This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal. Evidence: Crizac Ltd · 0.32× | Not enough peers | 0/3 recent comparable periods | 1/3 companies · 2 observations Definition: PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing. ### PEG — lowest PEG 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): 0.3 ### P/E — lowest P/E 1. Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC): 15.6 2. Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO): 23.7 ### 16-quarter PEG history - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 — | Sep 2025 — | Dec 2025 1.7 | Mar 2026 0.3 ### 16-quarter P/E history - CRIZAC: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 — | Sep 2025 33.8 | Dec 2025 26.5 | Mar 2026 15.9 - JARO: Mar 2020 — | Mar 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 — | Sep 2025 29.1 | Dec 2025 18.2 | Mar 2026 16.4 ## What can make this comparison misleading? - A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason. - A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment. - The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed. - An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion. - 1 company draws at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; it is marked unverified wherever that figure appears. - 1 company is missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business. - Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings. ## Every company - Physicswallah Ltd (PWL) — market value ₹36.2K Cr; latest fundamentals Mar 2026; second-feed figures WITHHELD - Crizac Ltd (CRIZAC) — market value ₹3.4K Cr; latest fundamentals Mar 2026 - Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd (JARO) — market value ₹1.0K Cr; latest fundamentals Mar 2026; includes UNVERIFIED second-feed figures ## Source standing of each company Cross-checked: 1. Unverified: 1. Withheld: 1. Graded companies: 3. 1 of 3 companies draws at least one figure from a second data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source, because the two do not share enough reported history to compare. Those figures are marked unverified wherever they appear. 1 of 3 companies has a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: Physicswallah Ltd (PWL) — its two data sources disagree by up to 18% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. - WITHHELD | PWL | Physicswallah Ltd | diff_gt_2pct | disagreement up to 18.38% over 7 comparable periods - UNVERIFIED | JARO | Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd | too little overlapping reported history to cross-check the second feed ## Methodology and freshness Fundamentals through Mar 2026; prices through 2026-07-31. Up to 16 quarters per company. Reported history is normalized to Indian rupees crore. Missing values are not interpolated. Derived metrics are calculated only when their inputs are comparable. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is the Platform - Education sector outperforming NIFTY 500? Platform - Education has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 44.7% over 52 weeks and 6.6% over 13 weeks. 0 of 1 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 0 of 0 beat the sector itself. ### Which Platform - Education company is largest by revenue? Physicswallah Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,899 crore, based on 3 of 3 comparable companies through Mar 2026. ### Which Platform - Education company is growing fastest? Crizac Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 22.7%, across 2 of 3 comparable companies. ### Which Platform - Education company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score? Crizac Ltd ranks first at 77.5/100 with 75% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation. ### Which Platform - Education company has the lowest comparable PEG? Crizac Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.32, among 1 of 3 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything. ### How much history does this Platform - Education comparison include? The page compares up to 16 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Mar 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated. ### How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated? The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral. ### What is the Nifty Platform - Education index? The Nifty Platform - Education index tracks India's listed Platform - Education companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 3 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Platform - Education sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Mar 2026. ### Which are the best Platform - Education stocks in India? Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Crizac Ltd places first among 3 listed Platform - Education companies, followed by Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Mar 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser. ### How many Platform - Education stocks are listed in India? This comparison covers 3 listed Platform - Education companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Mar 2026. ### Which Platform - Education company is the biggest? Physicswallah Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹3,899 crore, ahead of Crizac Ltd at ₹1,043 crore. That covers 3 of 3 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026. ### Which Platform - Education company has the best profit margins? Jaro Institute of Technol. Mgt. and Research Ltd has the highest operating margin at 29%, from 3 of 3 comparable companies. Physicswallah Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +41.1 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking. ### Which Platform - Education company makes the most profit? Crizac Ltd earns the most, at ₹219 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 3 of 3 comparable companies. Crizac Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 41.3%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed. ### Which Platform - Education company earns the highest return on capital? Crizac Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 52.3%, across 3 of 3 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year. ### Which Platform - Education stock is the cheapest? On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Crizac Ltd screens cheapest at 0.32×. Only 1 of 3 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own. ### Is the Platform - Education sector beating the market? Platform - Education has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 44.7% over the last 52 weeks and 6.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 0 of 1 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it. ### Which Platform - Education stock has the strongest price momentum? Crizac Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all. ### Which Platform - Education company scores highest for research priority? Crizac Ltd scores 77.5 out of 100 with 75% evidence confidence, from 35 points on growth and earnings, 20 on capital efficiency, 15 on valuation and 7.5 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research. ### How many Platform - Education companies does this comparison cover, and over what period? It compares 3 listed companies over up to 16 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Mar 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data. ### What is the total market cap of the Platform - Education sector? The 3 Platform - Education companies on this page carry ₹40,685 crore of combined market value. Physicswallah Ltd is the largest at ₹36,229 crore, about 89% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-05. ### How is the Platform - Education sector performing? 0 of the 1 covered Platform - Education companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 44.7% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-05. ### Why are some values on this page blank? A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad. ### Is this investment advice? No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.