Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV Stocks in India

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV: Tata Motors Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Craftsman Automation Ltd has the fastest current growth.

01 · the index people search for

Nifty Auto & Auto Ancl - CV Index — Constituents & Performance

The Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies below are the listed Indian Auto & Auto Ancl - CV universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Auto & Auto Ancl - CV index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading.

02 · the sector itself · before any single company

How has Auto & Auto Ancl - CV moved against NIFTY 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 27% ahead of NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 6% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 6 weeks running.

FADING · −1 in 4w✓Price up, without the fundamentals confirming4 of 6 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑6w · 4/6 >200d (−1) · 4/6 lead (−1) · EPS 5/5↑

20050020262025202420232022 495333 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100151Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 132, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 151, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 135, against 100 at the start · up 58.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 37.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 131, against 100 at the start · up 15.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 129, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 130, against 100 at the start · up 6.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 123, against 100 at the start · down 16.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · down 11.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 124, against 100 at the start · down 6.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · down 3.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 122, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 129, against 100 at the start · up 13.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 145, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two145 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
20050020262025202420232022 495333 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100151Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 132, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 151, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 135, against 100 at the start · up 58.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 37.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 131, against 100 at the start · up 15.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 129, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 130, against 100 at the start · up 6.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 123, against 100 at the start · down 16.9% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · down 11.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 124, against 100 at the start · down 6.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · down 3.2% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 122, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 129, against 100 at the start · up 13.4% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 145, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 5 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two145No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Auto & Auto Ancl - CV, equal-weighted, based at 200 NIFTY 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 6 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

03 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Auto & Auto Ancl - CV outperforming NIFTY 500?

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 31.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 10.3%. 4 of 6 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. GNA Axles Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +23.3%.

+10.3%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
+31.6%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
4/6Stocks leading NIFTY 500
3/6Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: 22.2 as of 2026-07-19 · LEADERS · rising.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 31.6% over 52 weeks and 10.3% over 13 weeks. 4 of 6 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 6 beat the sector itself. Tata Motors Ltd leads with revenue of ₹83,854 crore, based on 7 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
7
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹2.9 L Cr
Tata Motors Ltd
Revenue growing
5/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
4/6
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 7
04 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 95.6% evidence confidence.
Automotive Axles Ltd looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
GNA Axles Ltd has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Jamna Auto Industries LtdJAMNAAUTO 67.3/100Favorable setup96% evidence BREAKING OUT 25.7/35 Revenue 15.1% · PAT 28.3% · OPM change 3 pp 88% evidence 19.7/25 ROCE 27.5% · OPM 16% 100% evidence 15.9/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG 0.86 100% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -5.8% · RS bench 8.7% · 1Y 40.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.7 + 19.7 + 15.9 + 6 = 67.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -5.8% and the one-year return is 40.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
2Craftsman Automation LtdCRAFTSMAN 65.1/100Favorable setup82% evidence LEADER 27.3/35 Revenue 37.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 13.9% · OPM 16% 76% evidence 6.8/20 P/E 55.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 18.2/20 RS sector 10% · RS bench 27.3% · 1Y 57.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27.3 + 12.8 + 6.8 + 18.2 = 65.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3GNA Axles LtdGNA 56.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.8/35 Revenue 8% · PAT 29.4% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 14.3% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 8.0/20 P/E 17.4× · PEG 1.7 100% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 23.3% · RS bench 41.7% · 1Y 70.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.8 + 13.9 + 8 + 20 = 56.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 41.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
4Ashok Leyland LtdASHOKLEY 49.1/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence TURNING 14.9/35 Revenue 16.1% · PAT 10% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence 12.5/25 ROCE 13.6% · OPM 19% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 26.9× · PEG — 50% evidence 12.2/20 RS sector 5.6% · RS bench 1.9% · 1Y 36.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 12.5 + 9.5 + 12.2 = 49.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Automotive Axles LtdAUTOAXLES 44.3/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence ASLEEP 10.5/35 Revenue 4.8% · PAT 5.8% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence 15.1/25 ROCE 21.6% · OPM 12% 100% evidence 13.2/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG 1.98 100% evidence 5.5/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench -0.9% · 1Y -5%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.5 + 15.1 + 13.2 + 5.5 = 44.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
6Tata Motors LtdTMCV 55.0/100Thin evidence · provisional30% evidence TURNING 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 24% evidence 17.0/25 ROCE 35.9% · OPM 13% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 40.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —1 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 18.9 + 17 + 9.1 + 10 = 55 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Premier LtdPREMIER 37.1/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence 19.1/35 Revenue — · PAT 15.9% · OPM change — 18% evidence 5.0/25 ROCE -43.5% · OPM — 60% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench -7.6% · 1Y -30.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.1 + 5 + 10 + 3 = 37.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
05 · what price has already done

Market action

GNA Axles Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Auto & Auto Ancl - CV at +70.9%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +41.7%. 4 of 6 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-31.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

06 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Tata Motors Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at ₹83,854 crore. Ashok Leyland Ltd is next at ₹56,362 crore. Craftsman Automation Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 37.9%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Revenue series carries 7 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Tata Motors Ltd is the scale leader at ₹83,854 crore, 48.8% ahead of Ashok Leyland Ltd. Craftsman Automation Ltd's growth is 37.9% from a ₹8,717 crore base, with 15 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderTata Motors Ltd · ₹83,854 crore
Gap48.8% versus #2 · Ashok Leyland Ltd
Persistence3/3 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 108 observations

Investor read: Tata Motors Ltd is the scale benchmark; Craftsman Automation Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Tata Motors Ltd's growth falls below Craftsman Automation Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹83.9K Cr
2Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹56.4K Cr
3Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹8.7K Cr
4Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹2.6K Cr
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹2.2K Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN38%
2Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY16%
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO15%
4GNA Axles Ltd GNA8.0%
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES4.8%
Revenue · company comparison
7/7 level · 5/7 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹26.1K Cr19%Mar 2026
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹17.2K Cr17%Mar 2026
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹2.4K Cr36%Jun 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹840 Cr32%Mar 2026
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹664 Cr19%Mar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA₹470 Cr37%Jun 2026
Premier Ltd PREMIER₹0 Cr—Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
₹8.3K Cr
₹10.4K Cr
₹13.2K Cr
₹9.7K Cr
₹11.4K Cr
₹11.1K Cr
₹13.5K Cr
₹10.7K Cr
₹11.1K Cr
₹12.0K Cr
₹14.7K Cr
₹11.7K Cr
₹12.6K Cr
₹14.8K Cr
₹17.2K Cr
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

₹309 Cr
₹374 Cr
₹552 Cr
₹500 Cr
₹475 Cr
₹656 Cr
₹693 Cr
₹532 Cr
₹584 Cr
₹541 Cr
₹572 Cr
₹492 Cr
₹495 Cr
₹531 Cr
₹560 Cr
₹489 Cr
₹462 Cr
₹562 Cr
₹664 Cr
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

—
—
—
—
—
₹749 Cr
₹980 Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹2.0K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.4K Cr

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

₹340 Cr
₹301 Cr
₹281 Cr
₹375 Cr
₹420 Cr
₹404 Cr
₹384 Cr
₹374 Cr
₹404 Cr
₹357 Cr
₹371 Cr
₹400 Cr
₹388 Cr
₹375 Cr
₹378 Cr
₹344 Cr
₹348 Cr
₹375 Cr
₹411 Cr
₹470 Cr

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

₹352 Cr
₹445 Cr
₹626 Cr
₹548 Cr
₹553 Cr
₹591 Cr
₹634 Cr
₹575 Cr
₹607 Cr
₹604 Cr
₹640 Cr
₹557 Cr
₹513 Cr
₹562 Cr
₹638 Cr
₹573 Cr
₹531 Cr
₹668 Cr
₹840 Cr
—

Premier Ltd · PREMIER

—
—
—
—
—
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
—
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹17.5K Cr
₹18.8K Cr
₹21.9K Cr
₹17.3K Cr
₹18.6K Cr
₹21.8K Cr
₹26.1K Cr
—

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
38%
6.7%
2.6%
11%
-2.5%
8.1%
8.5%
9.2%
13%
24%
17%
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

—
—
—
96%
54%
75%
26%
6.4%
23%
-18%
-17%
-7.5%
-15%
-1.9%
-2.1%
-0.6%
-6.7%
5.8%
19%
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
51%
13%
11%
3.0%
39%
58%
55%
65%
31%
27%
36%

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

—
—
—
14%
24%
34%
37%
-0.3%
-3.8%
-12%
-3.4%
7.0%
-4.0%
5.0%
1.9%
-14%
-10%
0.0%
8.7%
37%

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

—
—
—
86%
57%
33%
1.3%
4.9%
9.8%
2.2%
1.0%
-3.1%
-15%
-7.0%
-0.3%
2.9%
3.5%
19%
32%
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6.0%
16%
19%
—
07 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Ashok Leyland Ltd has the highest OPM among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at 19%. Craftsman Automation Ltd is next at 16%. Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the highest Margin change at +3 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Ashok Leyland Ltd leads opm at 19%; Jamna Auto Industries Ltd leads margin change at +3 percentage points.

LeaderAshok Leyland Ltd · 19%
Gap18.8% versus #2 · Craftsman Automation Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/7 companies · 104 observations

Investor read: Ashok Leyland Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY19%
2Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN16%
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO16%
4GNA Axles Ltd GNA15%
5Tata Motors Ltd TMCV13%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO+3.0 pp
2Tata Motors Ltd TMCV+2.0 pp
3Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES+1.0 pp
4Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN+1.0 pp
5GNA Axles Ltd GNA0.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
6/7 level · 6/7 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY19%−1.0 ppMar 2026
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN16%+1.0 ppJun 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO16%+3.0 ppMar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA15%0.0 ppJun 2026
Tata Motors Ltd TMCV13%+2.0 ppMar 2026
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES12%+1.0 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

10%
9.9%
12%
9.1%
6.0%
13%
15%
16%
16%
18%
19%
17%
18%
19%
20%
19%
19%
19%
19%
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

7.2%
9.3%
11%
10%
11%
12%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
10%
10%
11%
11%
10%
10%
11%
12%
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

25%
23%
24%
24%
22%
21%
19%
21%
20%
19%
19%
17%
16%
13%
14%
15%
15%
15%
16%
16%

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

14%
13%
13%
13%
14%
16%
15%
16%
14%
13%
10%
14%
14%
14%
13%
15%
18%
18%
14%
15%

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

13%
13%
14%
11%
10%
11%
13%
13%
13%
14%
14%
13%
13%
14%
13%
13%
13%
17%
16%
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10%
11%
11%
12%
11%
12%
13%
—

Margin change · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

−4.7 pp
−2.7 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.9 pp
−4.4 pp
+3.1 pp
+3.0 pp
+6.9 pp
+10.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

+1.6 pp
−0.0 pp
+0.7 pp
+4.2 pp
+3.5 pp
+2.7 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

−2.2 pp
−5.9 pp
−4.5 pp
−0.4 pp
−3.0 pp
−2.1 pp
−4.6 pp
−3.3 pp
−2.2 pp
−2.0 pp
0.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−6.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

−4.5 pp
−4.7 pp
−2.4 pp
−3.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+3.2 pp
+1.8 pp
+2.5 pp
−0.3 pp
−3.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−2.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

+3.7 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.4 pp
−0.9 pp
+2.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
—
08 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Ashok Leyland Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at ₹3,721 crore. Tata Motors Ltd is next at ₹3,028 crore. Craftsman Automation Ltd has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Ashok Leyland Ltd leads with ₹3,721 crore of TTM profit, 22.9% above Tata Motors Ltd. Craftsman Automation Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (119.3% uncapped) growth from a ₹465 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderAshok Leyland Ltd · ₹3,721 crore
Gap22.9% versus #2 · Tata Motors Ltd
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 108 observations

Investor read: Ashok Leyland Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹3.7K Cr
2Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹3.0K Cr
3Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹465 Cr
4Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹231 Cr
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹165 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN100%
2GNA Axles Ltd GNA29%
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO28%
4Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY10.0%
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES5.8%
Net profit · company comparison
7/7 level · 5/7 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Tata Motors Ltd TMCV₹1.8K Cr34%Mar 2026
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY₹1.4K Cr11%Mar 2026
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN₹151 Cr116%Jun 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO₹87 Cr74%Mar 2026
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES₹54 Cr17%Mar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA₹38 Cr65%Jun 2026
Premier Ltd PREMIER₹-2 Cr—Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
₹199 Cr
₹351 Cr
₹803 Cr
₹584 Cr
₹569 Cr
₹609 Cr
₹934 Cr
₹551 Cr
₹767 Cr
₹820 Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹658 Cr
₹820 Cr
₹862 Cr
₹1.4K Cr
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

₹10 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹38 Cr
₹45 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹54 Cr
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

—
—
—
—
—
₹52 Cr
₹80 Cr
₹81 Cr
₹104 Cr
₹81 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹62 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹70 Cr
₹91 Cr
₹107 Cr
₹116 Cr
₹151 Cr

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

₹25 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹38 Cr

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

₹27 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹57 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹41 Cr
₹52 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹58 Cr
₹87 Cr
—

Premier Ltd · PREMIER

—
—
—
—
—
₹-3 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹-3 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹-0 Cr
₹-2 Cr
—
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹498 Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹-867 Cr
₹705 Cr
₹1.8K Cr
—

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
186%
74%
16%
-5.7%
35%
35%
33%
19%
6.9%
5.1%
11%
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

—
—
—
400%
200%
155%
31%
27%
50%
-24%
-14%
-11%
-20%
2.6%
4.6%
5.9%
0.0%
-2.5%
17%
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
56%
-11%
-27%
-40%
-84%
-5.6%
19%
47%
723%
73%
116%

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

—
—
—
-6.9%
32%
112%
89%
22%
-15%
-39%
-50%
-15%
3.6%
14%
47%
-18%
6.9%
28%
24%
65%

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

—
—
—
95%
37%
11%
-8.8%
24%
35%
34%
5.8%
0.0%
-20%
-20%
-9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
32%
74%
—

Tata Motors Ltd · TMCV

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-274%
-48%
34%
—
09 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Tata Motors Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at 35.9%. Jamna Auto Industries Ltd is next at 27.5%. Premier Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +56.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Tata Motors Ltd leads ROCE at 35.9%, 8.4 percentage points above Jamna Auto Industries Ltd. Premier Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +56.4 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderTata Motors Ltd · 35.9%
Gap30.5% versus #2 · Jamna Auto Industries Ltd
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage7/7 companies · 46 observations

Investor read: Tata Motors Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Tata Motors Ltd TMCV36%
2Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO28%
3Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES22%
4GNA Axles Ltd GNA14%
5Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN14%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Premier Ltd PREMIER · older report+56.4 pp
2Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO+3.2 pp
3Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN+2.0 pp
4Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY0.0 pp
5Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES−0.7 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
7/7 level · 6/7 change

Withheld from this chart: Tata Motors Ltd (TMCV) — its two data sources disagree by up to 86% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Ashok Leyland Ltd (ASHOKLEY) — its two data sources disagree by up to 17% on reported income across 15 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Craftsman Automation Ltd (CRAFTSMAN) — its two data sources disagree by up to 12% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO28%+3.2 ppMar 2026
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES18%−0.7 ppMar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA14%−0.9 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

12%
—
15%
—
23%
—
28%
—
29%
31%
23%
26%
20%
24%
19%
23%
18%
22%
18%
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

24%
—
20%
—
19%
—
25%
—
23%
23%
18%
18%
15%
17%
15%
17%
14%
17%
14%
—

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

26%
—
26%
—
30%
—
28%
32%
29%
34%
30%
33%
28%
29%
25%
26%
24%
28%
28%
—

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

—
—
—
—
+10.5 pp
—
+12.3 pp
—
+6.5 pp
—
−4.1 pp
—
−9.2 pp
−7.1 pp
−4.7 pp
−3.7 pp
−2.5 pp
−2.6 pp
−0.7 pp
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

—
—
—
—
−4.8 pp
—
+4.8 pp
—
+3.6 pp
—
−6.9 pp
—
−7.6 pp
−5.8 pp
−3.0 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.6 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.9 pp
—

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

—
—
—
—
+4.3 pp
—
+1.6 pp
—
−0.8 pp
—
+2.7 pp
+1.3 pp
−1.1 pp
−5.4 pp
−5.3 pp
−6.6 pp
−4.0 pp
−0.8 pp
+3.2 pp
—
10 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies compared here, at 0.86×. GNA Axles Ltd is next at 1.7×. Automotive Axles Ltd has the lowest P/E at 16.1×, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.86×, 49.4% below GNA Axles Ltd. Only 3 of 7 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderJamna Auto Industries Ltd · 0.86×
Gap49.4% versus #2 · GNA Axles Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/7 companies · 22 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO0.9
2GNA Axles Ltd GNA1.7
3Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES2.0
P/Elowest P/E
1Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES16.1
2GNA Axles Ltd GNA17.4
3Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO21.9
4Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY26.9
5Tata Motors Ltd TMCV40.6
Valuation · company comparison
3/7 level · 6/7 change

Withheld from this chart: Tata Motors Ltd (TMCV) — its two data sources disagree by up to 86% on reported income across 7 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Automotive Axles Ltd AUTOAXLES2.014.5Mar 2026
GNA Axles Ltd GNA1.716.1Jun 2026
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd JAMNAAUTO0.923.1Mar 2026
Ashok Leyland Ltd ASHOKLEY—26.6Mar 2026
Craftsman Automation Ltd CRAFTSMAN—57.7Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

—
0.9
0.8
—
—
—
0.8
—
0.4
0.3
1.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.0
—

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
0.6
—
—
—
—
—
1.4
0.3
—
1.4
0.5
0.7
1.7

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

—
—
1.6
—
0.6
0.7
—
1.2
4.4
2.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
—
—

P/E · reported quarter history

Ashok Leyland Ltd · ASHOKLEY

—
—
—
—
—
—
55.2
41.2
30.0
25.1
21.3
28.1
28.2
25.1
21.5
23.7
26.1
30.7
26.6
—

Automotive Axles Ltd · AUTOAXLES

36.0
42.8
37.8
32.0
29.7
25.1
23.8
20.7
19.7
17.6
15.4
18.2
17.8
17.8
15.8
17.7
16.8
17.4
14.5
—

Craftsman Automation Ltd · CRAFTSMAN

46.1
28.6
27.9
28.6
29.9
35.5
31.0
34.3
36.8
38.3
28.5
38.5
48.8
48.2
57.0
61.7
70.0
67.6
47.0
57.7

GNA Axles Ltd · GNA

18.4
14.4
11.1
12.6
15.9
15.1
14.8
13.1
14.9
14.6
13.9
16.9
20.1
18.3
14.9
13.2
13.1
12.9
14.6
16.1

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd · JAMNAAUTO

34.3
33.2
30.1
31.4
28.6
24.7
23.0
24.2
26.4
23.5
26.0
24.0
23.4
19.6
16.3
21.0
22.9
28.0
23.1
—
11 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Auto & Auto Ancl - CV comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 7 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. 3 have second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
  • 3 companies are missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
12 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-31.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-31 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing3 cross-checked · 1 unverified · 3 withheld, of 7 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.

13 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company comparison FAQs

These 24 answers restate the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 7 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-31. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 31.6% over 52 weeks and 10.3% over 13 weeks. 4 of 6 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 3 of 6 beat the sector itself.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company is largest by revenue?

Tata Motors Ltd leads with revenue of ₹83,854 crore, based on 7 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company is growing fastest?

Craftsman Automation Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 37.9%, across 5 of 7 comparable companies.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd ranks first at 67.3/100 with 95.6% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.86, among 3 of 7 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Auto & Auto Ancl - CV comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

What is the Nifty Auto & Auto Ancl - CV index?

The Nifty Auto & Auto Ancl - CV index tracks India's listed Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 7 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.

Which are the best Auto & Auto Ancl - CV stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Jamna Auto Industries Ltd places first among 7 listed Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies, followed by Craftsman Automation Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Auto & Auto Ancl - CV stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 7 listed Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company is the biggest?

Tata Motors Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹83,854 crore, ahead of Ashok Leyland Ltd at ₹56,362 crore. That covers 7 of 7 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company has the best profit margins?

Ashok Leyland Ltd has the highest operating margin at 19%, from 6 of 7 comparable companies. Jamna Auto Industries Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +3 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company makes the most profit?

Ashok Leyland Ltd earns the most, at ₹3,721 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 7 of 7 comparable companies. Craftsman Automation Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company earns the highest return on capital?

Tata Motors Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 35.9%, across 7 of 7 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Jamna Auto Industries Ltd screens cheapest at 0.86×. Only 3 of 7 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector beating the market?

Auto & Auto Ancl - CV has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 31.6% over the last 52 weeks and 10.3% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 4 of 6 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV stock has the strongest price momentum?

GNA Axles Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Auto & Auto Ancl - CV company scores highest for research priority?

Jamna Auto Industries Ltd scores 67.3 out of 100 with 95.6% evidence confidence, from 25.7 points on growth and earnings, 19.7 on capital efficiency, 15.9 on valuation and 6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 7 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector?

The 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies on this page carry ₹2,94,573 crore of combined market value. Tata Motors Ltd is the largest at ₹1,60,860 crore, about 55% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-05.

What is the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 7 Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies on this page is 26.9×, measured on the 6 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-05.

How is the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector performing?

4 of the 6 covered Auto & Auto Ancl - CV companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 31.6% ahead of NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-05.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI