Jamna Auto Industries Ltd (JAMNAAUTO) — share price & stock analysis
Profits have been broadly flat for two years, most of that is already in the price.
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd (JAMNAAUTO) trades at ₹135 as of 1 July 2026, up 42% over the past year — beating NIFTY 500 for 39 weeks. The machine reads this as steady growth, fairly priced: profits have been broadly flat for two years, most of that is already in the price. It trades at a P/E of 22.5× (the 45th percentile of its own range); the price is in Stage 2 — advancing, 44 weeks in; the business cycle reads DEEP CYCLICAL / EXPANSION. Fundamentals-momentum score: 100/100 (all improving).
Data as of 1 July 2026 · every number traces to its Screener source column · not investment advice.
- Market cap
- ₹5,383 Cr
- P/E
- 22.5×
- ROE
- 22.4%
- vs own 10-yr valuation
- 45th pctile
- Book value / share
- ₹28.7
- EPS (TTM)
- ₹5.06
- 10-yr median P/E
- 23.3×
- Revenue (FY26)
- ₹2,612 Cr
- Profit after tax (FY26)
- ₹231 Cr
- Weinstein stage
- Stage 2 (44 weeks)
- Data as of
- 1 July 2026
Profits swing violently in this business — margins swinging 10 points peak to trough. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.net_profit
Where the clock stands now: earnings sit at 100% of their historical range, margins are near the top of their band, and the market pays mid-range (45th percentile). That reads as EXPANSION — the comfortable middle — but the records are already on the table; from here the bet is that they keep coming.net_profit
6 of the 6 things we track are currently moving the right way — nearly everything is pulling in the same direction.
Where the levels actually stand: ROCE 27% — a high-quality engine; effectively no debt; margins near the top of their band. Momentum says which way things are moving; these say where they are.
Read this number for what it is: it measures the DIRECTION of change, not the quality of the business. A mediocre business getting better scores high here; a great one having a soft quarter scores low. Profit, sales and margins count double.
Most of this rally is re-rating, not earnings
Since Mar 2016, the stock is up 371% while earnings per share grew 150%. The difference is re-rating — investors paying more for the same rupee of profit.pricettm_eps
That works until it doesn’t: from here, earnings have to do the lifting, because the multiple has already done its part.
Today’s P/E of 22.5× is the middle of its own range against its own 10-year history (45th percentile) — neither a bargain nor a stretch, by its own standards.pe_ratio
Data: Price, EPS and valuation (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | EPS (TTM) (₹) | P/E (×) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16 | 28.3 | – | 19.1 |
| Jun 16 | 32.1 | 1.8 | 17.8 |
| Aug 16 | 40.8 | 2.2 | 18.9 |
| Oct 16 | 44.8 | 2.3 | 19.3 |
| Dec 16 | 34.0 | 2.5 | 14.7 |
| Mar 17 | 41.6 | 2.5 | 16.9 |
| May 17 | 45.3 | 2.6 | 17.2 |
| Jul 17 | 51.1 | 2.4 | 21.4 |
| Oct 17 | 62.1 | 2.4 | 26.0 |
| Dec 17 | 69.7 | 2.6 | 26.9 |
| Feb 18 | 79.3 | 2.9 | 27.8 |
| May 18 | 99.8 | 2.9 | 35.0 |
| Jul 18 | 89.9 | 3.1 | 28.6 |
| Sep 18 | 79.7 | 3.7 | 21.5 |
| Nov 18 | 69.0 | 3.9 | 17.9 |
| Feb 19 | 53.1 | 3.8 | 14.1 |
| Apr 19 | 59.8 | 3.8 | 15.8 |
| Jun 19 | 52.8 | 3.5 | 15.3 |
| Sep 19 | 36.1 | 3.0 | 12.2 |
| Nov 19 | 45.5 | 2.2 | 20.4 |
| Jan 20 | 45.0 | – | 20.2 |
| Apr 20 | 23.1 | 1.8 | 13.2 |
| Jun 20 | 29.4 | 1.2 | 24.5 |
| Aug 20 | 43.8 | – | – |
| Oct 20 | 40.3 | – | – |
| Jan 21 | 63.4 | – | – |
| Mar 21 | 69.3 | – | 75.4 |
| May 21 | 83.0 | 1.8 | 90.2 |
| Aug 21 | 88.0 | – | 48.1 |
| Oct 21 | 98.9 | 2.6 | 37.5 |
| Dec 21 | 101 | 3.1 | 32.3 |
| Mar 22 | 99.5 | 3.3 | 30.2 |
| May 22 | 106 | 3.3 | 32.2 |
| Jul 22 | 126 | 3.5 | 35.5 |
| Sep 22 | 114 | 4.0 | 28.6 |
| Dec 22 | 108 | 4.2 | 25.5 |
| Feb 23 | 105 | 4.3 | 24.2 |
| Apr 23 | 105 | 4.3 | 24.2 |
| Jul 23 | 112 | 4.2 | 26.6 |
| Sep 23 | 122 | 4.4 | 27.6 |
| Nov 23 | 114 | 4.8 | 24.0 |
| Feb 24 | 119 | 4.8 | 24.9 |
| Apr 24 | 136 | 5.1 | 26.6 |
| Jun 24 | 129 | 5.2 | 25.1 |
| Aug 24 | 126 | 5.2 | 24.3 |
| Nov 24 | 111 | 5.2 | 21.4 |
| Jan 25 | 90.9 | 4.9 | 18.5 |
| Mar 25 | 75.4 | 4.6 | 16.3 |
| Jun 25 | 88.8 | 4.5 | 19.6 |
| Aug 25 | 90.6 | 4.5 | 20.1 |
| Oct 25 | 94.4 | 4.5 | 21.0 |
| Jan 26 | 133 | 4.5 | 29.5 |
| Feb 26 | 147 | 5.1 | 29.1 |
| Apr 26 | 122 | 5.1 | 24.0 |
| Jun 26 | 132 | – | 22.1 |
| Jul 26 | 135 | – | 22.5 |
Price is the weekly close (₹). EPS is trailing-twelve-month profit per share, anchored on Screener's own snapshots; between snapshots it is filled from price ÷ P/E (an exact identity), and any fill straying more than 18% from the neighbouring snapshots is dropped rather than shown. The lower panel is the P/E — what the market pays per rupee of profit; the dotted line is its long-run median (23.3×).
Stage 2: the trend is up, and has been for 44 weeks
STAGE 2 · ADVANCING · 44 WEEKSPrice trends have a life cycle: they base (1), advance (2), top out (3) and decline (4). This chart is in Stage 2: advancing — 44 weeks so far, confirmed.stage
The price sits above its rising 200-day average (₹119 today) — trends like this persist more often than they reverse, which is why the system rides them instead of guessing the top.dma_200
Beating NIFTY 500 for 39 weeks — relative strength is the market’s live opinion, and right now it is on this stock’s side.rs_mansfield
What would end it: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the house exit rule — mechanical, no debates.dma_200
Data: Weekly price, moving averages and stage (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | 200-DMA (₹) | 50-DMA (₹) | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16 | 24.3 | 23.5 | 26.4 | 4 |
| May 16 | 28.8 | 25.5 | 28.2 | 2 |
| Aug 16 | 40.8 | 29.6 | 35.3 | 2 |
| Nov 16 | 42.1 | 35.7 | 43.2 | 2 |
| Jan 17 | 37.7 | 35.8 | 36.6 | 3 |
| Apr 17 | 49.0 | 38.6 | 42.8 | 2 |
| Jul 17 | 51.9 | 43.7 | 50.2 | 2 |
| Oct 17 | 62.1 | 47.1 | 51.8 | 2 |
| Dec 17 | 81.0 | 55.3 | 66.7 | 2 |
| Mar 18 | 78.0 | 65.4 | 77.2 | 2 |
| Jun 18 | 91.0 | 76.7 | 90.4 | 2 |
| Sep 18 | 79.2 | 80.1 | 84.0 | 2 |
| Nov 18 | 69.0 | 77.2 | 73.7 | 4 |
| Feb 19 | 53.0 | 68.9 | 57.8 | 4 |
| May 19 | 50.5 | 64.0 | 56.2 | 4 |
| Aug 19 | 37.1 | 57.4 | 47.1 | 4 |
| Nov 19 | 45.0 | 49.2 | 39.8 | 4 |
| Jan 20 | 45.0 | 47.1 | 44.2 | 4 |
| Apr 20 | 27.2 | 40.9 | 31.1 | 4 |
| Jul 20 | 31.9 | 35.4 | 30.0 | 4 |
| Oct 20 | 44.5 | 37.6 | 41.8 | 2 |
| Dec 20 | 58.3 | 43.3 | 51.9 | 2 |
| Mar 21 | 69.3 | 53.7 | 66.6 | 2 |
| Jun 21 | 85.9 | 62.0 | 75.0 | 2 |
| Sep 21 | 86.0 | 72.5 | 84.8 | 2 |
| Nov 21 | 106 | 83.2 | 98.8 | 2 |
| Feb 22 | 103 | 93.5 | 106 | 2 |
| May 22 | 106 | 98.0 | 106 | 2 |
| Aug 22 | 122 | 108 | 121 | 2 |
| Oct 22 | 109 | 111 | 114 | 2 |
| Jan 23 | 104 | 109 | 107 | 4 |
| Apr 23 | 102 | 106 | 102 | 4 |
| Jul 23 | 112 | 104 | 102 | 4 |
| Sep 23 | 117 | 109 | 115 | 2 |
| Dec 23 | 108 | 110 | 111 | 2 |
| Mar 24 | 122 | 113 | 119 | 2 |
| Jun 24 | 123 | 121 | 128 | 2 |
| Aug 24 | 126 | 124 | 129 | 2 |
| Nov 24 | 99.8 | 120 | 113 | 4 |
| Feb 25 | 83.8 | 109 | 93.9 | 4 |
| May 25 | 83.0 | 95.7 | 80.3 | 4 |
| Aug 25 | 90.7 | 94.1 | 91.9 | 4 |
| Oct 25 | 94.4 | 96.8 | 98.9 | 2 |
| Jan 26 | 128 | 106 | 121 | 2 |
| Apr 26 | 125 | 115 | 124 | 2 |
| Jun 26 | 122 | 117 | 122 | 2 |
| Jul 26 | 135 | 119 | 125 | 2 |
Up in 10 of 12 years — the long arc of a compounder
Over 12 years, sales went from ₹833 Cr to ₹2,612 Cr (about 10% a year), and profit from ₹14.0 Cr to ₹231 Cr.revenuenet_profit
Margins widened 9.3 points along the way — growth with improving economics.operating_profit
Data: Revenue by year
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 833 |
| FY15 | 1,095 |
| FY16 | 1,256 |
| FY17 | 1,292 |
| FY18 | 1,738 |
| FY19 | 2,135 |
| FY20 | 1,129 |
| FY21 | 1,079 |
| FY22 | 1,718 |
| FY23 | 2,325 |
| FY24 | 2,427 |
| FY25 | 2,270 |
| FY26 | 2,612 |
Data: Profit by year
| Period | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 14 |
| FY15 | 29 |
| FY16 | 72 |
| FY17 | 105 |
| FY18 | 125 |
| FY19 | 137 |
| FY20 | 48 |
| FY21 | 73 |
| FY22 | 141 |
| FY23 | 168 |
| FY24 | 205 |
| FY25 | 180 |
| FY26 | 231 |
Data: OPM % by year
| Period | OPM % (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 5.9 |
| FY15 | 8.7 |
| FY16 | 13.1 |
| FY17 | 15.6 |
| FY18 | 13.8 |
| FY19 | 13.1 |
| FY20 | 10.3 |
| FY21 | 12.4 |
| FY22 | 13.2 |
| FY23 | 11.3 |
| FY24 | 13.6 |
| FY25 | 13.4 |
| FY26 | 15.2 |
Sales jumped 32% last quarter — the 4th straight quarter of growth
Mar 26 sales were ₹840 Cr, up 32% on the same quarter last year.revenue
That makes 4 quarters of growth in a row — this is a trend, not a blip.revenue
Data: Quarterly sales
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 575 | – |
| Sep 23 | 607 | – |
| Dec 23 | 604 | – |
| Mar 24 | 640 | – |
| Jun 24 | 557 | -3.1 |
| Sep 24 | 513 | -15.5 |
| Dec 24 | 562 | -7.0 |
| Mar 25 | 638 | -0.3 |
| Jun 25 | 573 | 2.9 |
| Sep 25 | 531 | 3.5 |
| Dec 25 | 668 | 18.9 |
| Mar 26 | 840 | 31.7 |
Margins are widening — 13% → 16% in a year
Of every ₹100 of sales, the company keeps ₹16.3 as operating profit (a year ago it kept ₹13.1).opm_pct
Zoom out and this is the page's quiet hero: annual operating margin bottomed at 11.3% in FY23 and has been rebuilt to 15.2% — that recovery, not sales alone, is what powers the profit growth elsewhere on this page.operating_profit
The gross margin moved the same way (36% → 37%), so this is about input costs and pricing power — the raw-material equation improved.gpm_pctopm_pct
Data: Three margins, quarterly
| Period | Gross (%) | Operating (%) | Net (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 35.1 | 12.7 | 7.9 |
| Sep 23 | 36.0 | 13.0 | 8.3 |
| Dec 23 | 37.9 | 14.3 | 9.1 |
| Mar 24 | 35.7 | 13.9 | 8.6 |
| Jun 24 | 37.3 | 13.4 | 8.3 |
| Sep 24 | 37.4 | 12.9 | 7.8 |
| Dec 24 | 39.2 | 13.7 | 7.8 |
| Mar 25 | 36.0 | 13.1 | 7.9 |
| Jun 25 | 37.6 | 13.3 | 8.0 |
| Sep 25 | 37.4 | 13.0 | 7.5 |
| Dec 25 | 39.9 | 17.1 | 9.9 |
| Mar 26 | 36.7 | 16.3 | 10.4 |
Profit exploded 74% — mostly from selling more
Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹87.0 Cr, up 74% year on year.net_profit
Data: Quarterly profit after tax
| Period | PAT (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 46.0 | – |
| Sep 23 | 50.0 | – |
| Dec 23 | 55.0 | – |
| Mar 24 | 55.0 | – |
| Jun 24 | 46.0 | 0.0 |
| Sep 24 | 40.0 | -20.0 |
| Dec 24 | 44.0 | -20.0 |
| Mar 25 | 50.0 | -9.1 |
| Jun 25 | 46.0 | 0.0 |
| Sep 25 | 40.0 | 0.0 |
| Dec 25 | 58.0 | 31.8 |
| Mar 26 | 87.0 | 74.0 |
The single biggest driver was selling more.
Data: Where the profit change came from (Mar 25 → Mar 26)
| Component | Effect (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| PAT Mar 25 | 50 |
| More sales | +27 |
| Fatter margins | +26 |
| Other income | −1 |
| Depreciation | −6 |
| Interest | −3 |
| Tax | −7 |
| Everything else | +1 |
| PAT Mar 26 | 87 |
The profits are real — they turn into cash
Over the last 5 profitable years, the business reported ₹925 Cr of profit and collected ₹1,264 Cr of operating cash — about 137% conversion.operating_cash_flownet_profit
One asterisk on that strength: suppliers are being paid 29 days later than a year ago (19 → 48 days). Cash flattered by stretching payables is real cash — but it is borrowed timing, not extra earning power.payable_days
Data: Cash collected vs profit reported (annual)
| Period | Operating cash flow (₹ Cr) | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 45.0 | 14.0 |
| FY15 | 98.0 | 29.0 |
| FY16 | 138 | 72.0 |
| FY17 | 81.0 | 105 |
| FY18 | 126 | 125 |
| FY19 | 281 | 137 |
| FY20 | -1.0 | 48.0 |
| FY21 | 100 | 73.0 |
| FY22 | 1.0 | 141 |
| FY23 | 374 | 168 |
| FY24 | 90.0 | 205 |
| FY25 | 289 | 180 |
| FY26 | 510 | 231 |
The cash cycle looks tighter — but it is supplier credit doing the work
One rupee now takes about 37 days to go out the door as materials and come back as collected cash — down from 88 days the year before.cash_conversion_cycle
Look inside the improvement, though: suppliers are being paid 29 days later (19 → 48 days). Supplier credit is funding the cycle — useful, but not the same thing as customers paying faster.payable_daysinventory_days
Data: Days of cash locked up (annual)
| Period | Customers owe (debtor days) (days) | Stock on shelf (inventory days) (days) | We owe suppliers (payable days) (days) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 47.0 | 65.0 | 124 |
| FY15 | 19.0 | 54.0 | 91.0 |
| FY16 | 11.0 | 49.0 | 61.0 |
| FY17 | 10.0 | 53.0 | 37.0 |
| FY18 | 40.0 | 53.0 | 68.0 |
| FY19 | 52.0 | 61.0 | 117 |
| FY20 | 26.0 | 67.0 | 19.0 |
| FY21 | 58.0 | 116 | 102 |
| FY22 | 61.0 | 102 | 66.0 |
| FY23 | 10.0 | 77.0 | 15.0 |
| FY24 | 28.0 | 84.0 | 15.0 |
| FY25 | 25.0 | 82.0 | 19.0 |
| FY26 | 11.0 | 74.0 | 48.0 |
The asset base keeps compounding — this company builds
The productive asset base has gone from ₹259 Cr (FY14) to ₹849 Cr, with another ₹108 Cr of capacity under construction right now.fixed_assetscwip
The build is self-funded: the last 3 years' investing outflow (₹594 Cr) fits inside the operating cash the business generated (₹889 Cr).investing_cash_flowoperating_cash_flow
Data: Assets in place vs under construction (annual)
| Period | Fixed assets (₹ Cr) | Under construction (CWIP) (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 259 | 2.0 |
| FY15 | 242 | 8.0 |
| FY16 | 211 | 65.0 |
| FY17 | 281 | 20.0 |
| FY18 | 301 | 31.0 |
| FY19 | 373 | 40.0 |
| FY20 | 369 | 132 |
| FY21 | 351 | 134 |
| FY22 | 436 | 53.0 |
| FY23 | 434 | 56.0 |
| FY24 | 468 | 121 |
| FY25 | 504 | 275 |
| FY26 | 849 | 108 |
Almost no debt — this company cannot be killed by a bad year
For every ₹100 shareholders have put in (and left in), the company has borrowed ₹1 — total borrowings have shrunk from ₹127 Cr to ₹12.0 Cr over the window.borrowings
Data: Total borrowings (annual)
| Period | Borrowings (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 127 |
| FY15 | 64.0 |
| FY16 | 16.0 |
| FY17 | 73.0 |
| FY18 | 63.0 |
| FY19 | 4.0 |
| FY20 | 152 |
| FY21 | 125 |
| FY22 | 191 |
| FY23 | 30.0 |
| FY24 | 293 |
| FY25 | 358 |
| FY26 | 12.0 |
Data: Debt vs shareholders’ money (annual)
| Period | Debt ÷ equity (x) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 0.7 |
| FY15 | 0.3 |
| FY16 | 0.1 |
| FY17 | 0.2 |
| FY18 | 0.2 |
| FY19 | 0.0 |
| FY20 | 0.3 |
| FY21 | 0.2 |
| FY22 | 0.3 |
| FY23 | 0.0 |
| FY24 | 0.3 |
| FY25 | 0.4 |
| FY26 | 0.0 |
Every ₹100 kept in the business now earns ₹27 — and the number is rising
Return on capital employed is 27.0% (a year ago: 21.0%). This is the single best test of business quality: what the company earns on the money it keeps.roce_pct
Rising returns on capital while growing is the rarest combination in investing — it means the new projects earn more than the old ones.roce_pct
Data: Returns on capital (annual)
| Period | ROCE (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 8.0 |
| FY15 | 23.0 |
| FY16 | 49.0 |
| FY17 | 48.0 |
| FY18 | 46.0 |
| FY19 | 49.0 |
| FY20 | 15.0 |
| FY21 | 16.0 |
| FY22 | 25.0 |
| FY23 | 28.0 |
| FY24 | 29.0 |
| FY25 | 21.0 |
| FY26 | 27.0 |
The owners aren’t moving
Promoters hold 49.9%, essentially unchanged. Foreign funds own 9.3%, domestic funds 4.8%.promoters_pctfiis_pctdiis_pct
Meanwhile domestic funds have been the sellers — from 14.6% to 4.8% over the window. Someone on the other side of the table disagrees; both sides count.diis_pct
Data: Who holds the shares, quarterly
| Period | Promoters (%) | Foreign funds (%) | Domestic funds (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 50.0 | 3.3 | 14.6 |
| Sep 23 | 50.0 | 5.8 | 12.3 |
| Dec 23 | 50.0 | 5.7 | 10.8 |
| Mar 24 | 49.9 | 7.7 | 7.1 |
| Jun 24 | 49.9 | 9.0 | 6.3 |
| Sep 24 | 49.9 | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Dec 24 | 49.9 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Mar 25 | 49.9 | 2.8 | 5.6 |
| Jun 25 | 49.9 | 2.0 | 6.3 |
| Sep 25 | 49.9 | 2.4 | 7.0 |
| Dec 25 | 49.9 | 5.2 | 8.1 |
| Mar 26 | 49.9 | 9.3 | 4.8 |
- Promoters are not selling. Their stake has moved 0.1 points or less in 8 quarters — it sits at 49.9%.promoters_pct
Strong on the data — worth the deeper look if the story keeps its promises
The numbers lean positive, and the price already assumes the good news continues.
Best thing in the data: free cash flow rising (₹100 Cr → ₹265 Cr).operating_cash_flow
Machine-written research from Screener data — every number traces to its source column. Sector Alpha is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser; nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell. Not investment advice.
Straight answers from the data
What does Jamna Auto Industries Ltd do?
Incorporated in 1965, Jamna Auto Industries Limited manufactures conventional leaf springs, parabolic leaf springs, air suspensions and lift axles, predominantly for Commercial Vehicles.[1]. It is listed in the Auto & Auto Ancl - CV sector with a market capitalisation of ₹5,383 Cr.
What is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd's share price?
As of 1 July 2026, Jamna Auto Industries Ltd trades at ₹135, up 42% over the past year, with a market capitalisation of ₹5,383 Cr. Beating NIFTY 500 for 39 weeks. Prices are weekly closes from Screener data; this page refreshes with each weekly update.
What is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd's share price target?
Sector Alpha does not publish broker-style price targets. Our discounted-cash-flow model estimates Jamna Auto Industries Ltd's intrinsic value at ₹165 per share under base assumptions (bear ₹71.0, bull ₹194), against the current price of ₹135 — a 39% margin of safety. The current price already implies roughly 11% annual earnings growth. These are model estimates, not forecasts — treat them as one input alongside the valuation history below, not as a target.
Is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd stock overvalued or undervalued?
Jamna Auto Industries Ltd trades at a P/E of 22.5× — the 45th percentile of its own 10.3-year trading range (median 23.3×), which is below the middle of its own historical range. Most of this rally is re-rating, not earnings. Since Mar 2016, the stock is up 371% while earnings per share grew 150%. The difference is re-rating — investors paying more for the same rupee of profit. One caveat: margins are currently at the top of their own historical band, so the earnings behind that multiple may themselves be at a cyclical high — the stock is cheaper than its history partly because the E is fatter than usual.
What did Jamna Auto Industries Ltd report in its latest quarterly results?
In its most recent reported quarter (Q4 FY26, quarter ended March 2026): Mar 26 sales were ₹840 Cr, up 32% on the same quarter last year. Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹87.0 Cr, up 74% year on year. Figures are from Screener-scraped quarterly filings; the page updates when the next quarter is filed.
Is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd growing?
Sales jumped 32% last quarter — the 4th straight quarter of growth. Mar 26 sales were ₹840 Cr, up 32% on the same quarter last year.
Are Jamna Auto Industries Ltd's profits growing?
Profit exploded 74% — mostly from selling more. Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹87.0 Cr, up 74% year on year.
What are Jamna Auto Industries Ltd's operating margins?
Margins are widening — 13% → 16% in a year. In the most recent quarter, of every ₹100 of sales, the company keeps ₹16.3 as operating profit (a year ago it kept ₹13.1).
What is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd's long-term growth record?
Revenue grew from ₹833 Cr in FY14 to ₹2,612 Cr in FY26 — a 10.0% compound annual growth rate over 12 years. Profit after tax compounded at 26.3% over the same period (₹14 Cr → ₹231 Cr).
Is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd stock in an uptrend?
Stage 2: the trend is up, and has been for 44 weeks. Jamna Auto Industries Ltd is in Stage 2 — advancing, 44 weeks in (confirmed). Stages follow Stan Weinstein's four-phase read of weekly price against the 200-day average: basing (1), advancing (2), topping (3), declining (4).
Why is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd stock rising?
The price is up 42% over the past year, in a confirmed Stage 2 uptrend (44 weeks), and has beaten NIFTY 500 for 39 weeks. Since 2016, the price is up 371% while earnings per share moved 150%.
Is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd beating the NIFTY 500?
Yes — beating NIFTY 500 for 39 weeks, as of 1 July 2026. Relative strength is measured weekly against the NIFTY 500 (Mansfield RS): a positive reading means the stock has outperformed the index over the trailing window, week after week.
Where is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd in its business cycle?
The data reads Jamna Auto Industries Ltd as a deep cyclical business currently in its expansion phase — earnings at an all-time high for this company, valuation at the 45th percentile. Profits swing violently in this business — margins swinging 10 points peak to trough. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.
Who owns Jamna Auto Industries Ltd — what is the promoter holding?
Promoters hold 49.9%, essentially unchanged. Foreign funds own 9.3%, domestic funds 4.8%. Meanwhile domestic funds have been the sellers — from 14.6% to 4.8% over the window. Someone on the other side of the table disagrees; both sides count. Shareholding is from Screener's quarterly filings data.
Does Jamna Auto Industries Ltd have too much debt?
Almost no debt — this company cannot be killed by a bad year. For every ₹100 shareholders have put in (and left in), the company has borrowed ₹1 — total borrowings have shrunk from ₹127 Cr to ₹12.0 Cr over the window.
What is the bull case for Jamna Auto Industries Ltd?
Profits have been broadly flat for two years, most of that is already in the price. Best thing in the data: free cash flow rising (₹100 Cr → ₹265 Cr). Sales jumped 32% last quarter — the 4th straight quarter of growth.
What is the bear case for Jamna Auto Industries Ltd — what could break the story?
Two quarters of margins reversing would kill this story. The nearest-term thing to watch: if quarterly growth slips below 16%, the story weakens. This falsification condition is stated up front so the thesis can be checked against incoming quarters, not defended after the fact.
Is Jamna Auto Industries Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
Sector Alpha does not publish buy or sell recommendations — this is a research read, not advice. What the data says: strong on the data — worth the deeper look if the story keeps its promises. The numbers lean positive, and the price already assumes the good news continues. Across the 7-model scorecard the composite research signal is study deeper at 83% confidence. This is machine-written research compiled from Screener data — every number traces to its source — and it is not investment advice. Do your own diligence.