Ingevity Corporation
NGVTIngevity Corporation's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is building a base (1 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +200.0% year on year, and 182% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Ingevity Corporation trades at $68.2, building a base and 1 weeks into that stage. That is −1.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 67% of a 52-week range of $48 to $78. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (2 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is building a base — week 1 of stage 1. At $68.2 it trades −1.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 67% of its 52-week range ($48–$78).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +87% while the S&P 500 moved +255% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (2 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Ingevity Corporation trades at 45.2× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 45.2× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Improving Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Ingevity Corporation reads as improving on its fundamental arc. Improving — profit growth bottomed 6 quarters ago at −100.0% and has held its recovery at +200.0% (single-quarter readings), ROCE holding at 4.6%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: a sustained climb off the trough is the setup this page is built to catch — the question moves to what you pay for it.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −2.5% | −11.2% | — | — |
| Stock price | +21.1% | +10.4% | −1.0% | +4.0% |
4-Factor Sector Score
50.6/100 — rank 11 of 29 in Specialty Chemicals · 58% evidence confidence
Ingevity Corporation scores 50.6 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Specialty Chemicals, ranking 11. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 22 + 12 + 8.9 + 7.7 = 50.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Ingevity Corporation reported $0.3 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +4.0% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at −4.2% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.2 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.2 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $1.2 B (−2.5% on the year), capping 4 years at −4.2% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.3 B, +4.0% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −0.3% growth against the decade's −4.2% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −0.8% over the last 4 quarters against −13.8%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Ingevity Corporation's operating margin is 26.9% in the Mar 26 quarter, +2.9 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −3.4% to 20.9%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 26.9%, +2.9 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −3.4%–20.9%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +2.9 pp year on year while gross margin went +2.2 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Ingevity Corporation earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +200.0% year on year. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.2 B. That is 23.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B. 6 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $0.1 B, +200.0% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.2 B (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 2 fiscal years 182% of Ingevity Corporation's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.3 B of operating cash against $−0.2 B of profit. After $0.1 B of capital spending, $0.3 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.3 B against reported profit of $−0.2 B, leaving free cash of $0.3 B after $0.1 B of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 182% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Ingevity Corporation does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Ingevity Corporation earns a ROE of −567% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +7.7 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is −14.5% net margin on 0.71× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is −567%.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −14.5% net margin × 0.71× asset turns × 55.00× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −566.2% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 16.0% − 8.3% = a +7.7 pp spread. The 8.3% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.
Dividend
Ingevity Corporation pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Ingevity Corporation does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Ingevity Corporation carries total debt of $1.2 B against shareholder equity of $0.1 B as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 24.80. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.97 in FY21 to 41.33 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Jun 26: total debt of $1.2 B against shareholder equity of $0.1 B — a debt-to-equity of 24.80. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.97 (FY21) to 41.33 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
3.9% of Ingevity Corporation's tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 5.6 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 3.9% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 5.6 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Ingevity Corporation: the Z-score reads 2.87. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.87 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 2.87.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1NewMarket CorporationNEU | 62.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.4 pp 45% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 21.4% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 17× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.2/20 RS sector 11.2% · RS bench 12.1% · 1Y 9.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 15.7 + 11.4 + 19.2 = 62.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.SQM | 62.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 29.0/35 Revenue 18.3% · PAT 48.4% · OPM change 17.4 pp 83% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 41% 76% evidence | 13.7/20 P/E 28.4× · PEG 0.81 65% evidence | 4.4/20 RS sector -8.8% · RS bench -9.3% · 1Y 58%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 29 + 15.3 + 13.7 + 4.4 = 62.4 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -8.8% and the one-year return is 58%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 3Sensient Technologies CorporationSXT | 61.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.7 pp 45% evidence | 12.1/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 15.3% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 33.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 13.6% · RS bench 13.9% · 1Y 24.6%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 12.1 + 9.7 + 19.4 = 61.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Avient CorporationAVNT | 58.0/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.6/35 Revenue 1.3% · PAT 56.9% · OPM change 11.2 pp 62% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 11.3% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.6/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench 6.3% · 1Y 16.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 8.9 + 10.9 + 17.6 = 58 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.IFF | 56.6/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.0/35 Revenue -5.6% · PAT — · OPM change 41.8 pp 62% evidence | 6.9/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 10% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 22.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.1/20 RS sector 7.7% · RS bench 7.8% · 1Y 32.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 6.9 + 10.6 + 18.1 = 56.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6PPG Industries, Inc.PPG | 55.0/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.6/35 Revenue 5% · PAT 52.2% · OPM change -1.2 pp 95% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 15.8/20 P/E 17.2× · PEG 0.29 65% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -10.5% · RS bench -10.4% · 1Y -4.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 15.9 + 15.8 + 4.7 = 55 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Quaker Chemical CorporationKWR | 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 21.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp 45% evidence | 8.0/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 7% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 28.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.8/20 RS sector -1.1% · RS bench -0.7% · 1Y 10.9%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 8 + 10.5 + 12.8 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Ashland Inc.ASH | 51.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.5 pp 45% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 8.1% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 57.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.3/20 RS sector 10.5% · RS bench 10.7% · 1Y 41.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 6.7 + 8.8 + 17.3 = 51.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Balchem CorporationBCPC | 51.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.1 pp 45% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 20.5% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 33.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -4.7% · RS bench -4.5% · 1Y 7.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 13.9 + 9.8 + 9.4 = 51.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10WD-40 CompanyWDFC | 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence | 16.7/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 16.3% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 30.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.7/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -17.1% · 1Y -9.8%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 16.7 + 10.2 + 2.7 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Ingevity Corporationthis pageNGVT | 50.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 45% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 26.6% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 53.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.7/20 RS sector -3.2% · RS bench -3.5% · 1Y 21.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22 + 12 + 8.9 + 7.7 = 50.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Linde plcLIN | 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.3/35 Revenue 6.6% · PAT 7.7% · OPM change -0.2 pp 95% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 13.8% · OPM 28.1% 76% evidence | 5.9/20 P/E 33.1× · PEG 3.28 65% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -8.9% · RS bench -8.8% · 1Y -3.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 19.1 + 5.9 + 6 = 50.3 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 13The Sherwin-Williams CompanySHW | 49.1/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.7/35 Revenue 5.8% · PAT 15.5% · OPM change 0.7 pp 95% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 7.1% · OPM 18.1% 76% evidence | 5.0/20 P/E 31.7× · PEG 4.15 65% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -10.7% · RS bench -10.2% · 1Y -7.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 15.9 + 5 + 7.5 = 49.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.AXTA | 49.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.3 pp 45% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 11.6% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.2/20 RS sector -1.2% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y 10%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.5 + 11.5 + 10.8 + 11.2 = 49 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15H.B. Fuller CompanyFUL | 48.7/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.2/35 Revenue -0.6% · PAT 80.6% · OPM change 1.2 pp 95% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 12.3% 76% evidence | 15.1/20 P/E 19× · PEG 0.5 65% evidence | 1.6/20 RS sector -20.6% · RS bench -20.2% · 1Y -16.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 10.8 + 15.1 + 1.6 = 48.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Ecolab Inc.ECL | 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | FADING | 15.4/35 Revenue 7.1% · PAT -1% · OPM change -0.4 pp 95% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 17.2% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 37.4× · PEG 1.4 65% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -6.3% · RS bench -5.9% · 1Y 3.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.4 + 13.1 + 9.9 + 9.4 = 47.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Eastman Chemical CompanyEMN | 47.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.6 pp 45% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 8.6% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 17.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -11.8% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y -0.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.5 + 12.8 + 11.2 + 5 = 47.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18RPM International Inc.RPM | 47.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp 45% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 5% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 20.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -13.5% · RS bench -13% · 1Y -18.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 12.2 + 11 + 5.9 = 47.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Cabot CorporationCBT | 44.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 8.7/35 Revenue -8.5% · PAT -31.2% · OPM change -3 pp 83% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 14.3% 76% evidence | 16.5/20 P/E 14.2× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y 1.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.7 + 12.7 + 16.5 + 6.8 = 44.7 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 20LyondellBasell Industries N.V.LYB | 44.6/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | TURNING | 12.8/35 Revenue -9.4% · PAT -164.8% · OPM change 1.8 pp 83% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 3.3% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 76.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 4.8% · RS bench 4.2% · 1Y 24.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 17 = 44.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 4.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 21Calumet, Inc.CLMT | 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 8.9/35 Revenue -0.1% · PAT — · OPM change -11.7 pp 62% evidence | 3.1/25 ROCE -9.1% · OPM -16.6% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 81.6% · RS bench 79.8% · 1Y 213.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.9 + 3.1 + 10.3 + 20 = 42.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 79.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 22Element Solutions IncESI | 40.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.3 pp 45% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 13.3% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 64.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.4/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench -9.9% · 1Y 21.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 10.4 + 8.7 + 3.4 = 40.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23DuPont de Nemours, Inc.DD | 39.5/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.4/35 Revenue 4% · PAT 40.7% · OPM change 5.2 pp 83% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 11.1% 76% evidence | 4.7/20 P/E 45.4× · PEG 4.12 65% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -19.9% · RS bench -19.1% · 1Y -45.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 7.2 + 4.7 + 6.2 = 39.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Perimeter Solutions, Inc.PRM | 38.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -50 pp 45% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE -7.6% · OPM 58% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 53.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector 5.1% · RS bench 5.3% · 1Y 45.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.1 + 7.4 + 9 + 12.3 = 38.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Albemarle CorporationALB | 38.0/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 14.5 pp 32% evidence | 8.8/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 16.3% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 47.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.1/20 RS sector -29% · RS bench -29.3% · 1Y 33.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 8.8 + 9.1 + 0.1 = 38 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Hawkins, Inc.HWKN | 37.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.2 pp 45% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM 8.8% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 41.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -21.8% · RS bench -21.4% · 1Y -29.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 11.9 + 9.4 + 1.4 = 37.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.APD | 35.8/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 6.3/35 Revenue 4.5% · PAT -99.8% · OPM change -92.5 pp 95% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE -5.8% · OPM -66.3% 76% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG 0.82 65% evidence | 10.9/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y -1.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.3 + 5.7 + 12.9 + 10.9 = 35.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Westlake CorporationWLK | 27.0/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | BASING | 9.8/35 Revenue -8.6% · PAT -473.1% · OPM change -5.4 pp 62% evidence | 4.8/25 ROCE -1% · OPM -6.5% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 33.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -21.9% · RS bench -22.2% · 1Y -14.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.8 + 4.8 + 9.6 + 2.8 = 27 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc.SOLS | 45.4/100Thin evidence · provisional36% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.5 pp 39% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM 16.5% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 67.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.5 + 14.3 + 8.6 + 10 = 45.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Ingevity Corporation's stock price today?
Ingevity Corporation trades at $68.2, +21.1% over the past year. The company is valued at $2.0 B. The stock sits at 67% of its 52-week range of $48–$78, −1.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 1 weeks in. — as of 17 September 2026.
What were Ingevity Corporation's latest quarterly results?
Ingevity Corporation reported revenue of $0.3 B and net profit of $0.1 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 4.0% and profit rose 200.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $1.66. The operating margin was 26.9%, 2.9 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Ingevity Corporation's revenue?
Ingevity Corporation reported revenue of $0.3 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +4.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $1.2 B (−2.5%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −4.2% a year. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Ingevity Corporation's profit?
Ingevity Corporation earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +200.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.2 B. The operating margin ran 26.9% in the latest quarter. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Ingevity Corporation's market cap?
Ingevity Corporation's market capitalisation is $2.0 B at a stock price of $68.2. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 17 September 2026.
Does Ingevity Corporation pay a dividend?
No — Ingevity Corporation has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Ingevity Corporation growing?
Yes — Ingevity Corporation is growing: latest-quarter revenue +4.0% year on year, profit +200.0%, and the margin +2.9 pp at 26.9%. The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 17 September 2026.
How is Ingevity Corporation performing?
Ingevity Corporation is building a base, 1 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 4.0% and profit rose 200.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 17 September 2026.
What stage is Ingevity Corporation in?
Improving — profit growth bottomed 6 quarters ago at −100.0% and has held its recovery at +200.0% (single-quarter readings), ROCE holding at 4.6%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −0.8% latest, profit growth +200.0% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Ingevity Corporation in an uptrend?
No — the price is building a base (week 1 of stage 1), trading −1.5% versus its 200-day average and at 67% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Ingevity Corporation beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Ingevity Corporation is currently behind the S&P 500 (2 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +87% against the S&P 500's +255% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 17 September 2026.
Will Ingevity Corporation's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Ingevity Corporation. What it measures instead: the stock price is $68.2, the price is building a base 1 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is the market betting against Ingevity Corporation?
Somewhat — short interest is 3.9% of Ingevity Corporation's tradable float, about 5.6 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 17 September 2026.
Does Ingevity Corporation have too much debt?
It carries real leverage — Ingevity Corporation's debt-to-equity is 26.36. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Ingevity Corporation's capex?
Ingevity Corporation spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.1 B. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Ingevity Corporation's cash flow?
Ingevity Corporation generated $0.3 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.3 B of free cash flow after $0.1 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.2 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Ingevity Corporation's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 2 fiscal years, 182% of Ingevity Corporation's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at -194% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY25, operating cash was $0.3 B against reported profit of $−0.2 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 17 September 2026.
How financially safe is Ingevity Corporation?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 2.87 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 17 September 2026.
Where is Ingevity Corporation in its business cycle?
Ingevity Corporation's FY25 operating margin was −3.4%, against a 5-year band of −3.4%–20.9%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 26.9%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 17 September 2026.
What could break the Ingevity Corporation story?
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Ingevity Corporation a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Ingevity Corporation's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 17 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!